Re: OpenSSH 5.2p1
Are you ignoring me? There is a new version of OpenSSH 5.2p1, and BLFS should upgrade to it. William -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: OpenSSH 5.2p1
William Immendorf wrote: > Are you ignoring me? There is a new version of OpenSSH 5.2p1, and BLFS > should upgrade to it. No, we are not ignoring the fact that there is a new OpenSSH version. Most of us have a few other things to do, like a job, and you shouldn't expect to see a response in less than 4 hours, as is the interval between your posts. If you really want to be helpful, why don't you see if the current commands work with the new package. A review of the *key* changes in your own words would be helpful. For instance, it looks like they added a capability to log errors to syslog instead of stderr with a -y option, but there don't appear to be any critical security issues. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: OpenSSH 5.2p1
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > If you really want to be helpful, why don't you see if the current commands > work > with the new package. A review of the *key* changes in your own words would be > helpful. For instance, it looks like they added a capability to log errors to > syslog instead of stderr with a -y option, but there don't appear to be any > critical security issues. I tend to be impatient, however. So keep that in mind. William. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: OpenSSH 5.2p1
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:06:01 -0600, William Immendorf wrote: > I tend to be impatient, however. So keep that in mind. And we tend to ignore impatient people who are unwilling/unable to help contribute to the books or support thereof. So keep that in mind. Honestly, William, could you not just have noticed that the new release had been made, test that the current book's instructions work with the new version and then instead of demanding the already stretched editors upgrade instantly, at least be able to say: "There's a new version of the OpenSSH package. I've tested it using the latest book's instructions and it works/doesn't work (delete/add more info as appropriate)." For bonus points, assuming the book's current instructions work as-is, providing the trivial patch against packages.ent would have gone a long way to boosting people's impressions of you. And now, given that, I hereby promise not to feed the troll anymore. Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: OpenSSH 5.2p1
> And now, given that, I hereby promise not to feed the troll anymore. I am not a troll, BTW. I am a austic guy. But I will still help. William -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
