[BlueOnyx:07822] Re: BlueOnyx vs BlueQuartz

2011-07-24 Thread Alex Jake

Thank you for your reply,

What I was after please was a list of differences in the UI between BlueQuartz 
and BlueOnyx.

Thank you

Alex

From: s...@aviaweb.com
To: blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 02:16:00 -0400
Subject: [BlueOnyx:07821] Re: BlueOnyx vs BlueQuartz



Alex, BQ is based on Centos4. BX is on Centos 5 and just coming out on 
Scientific Linux 6 (and maybe on Centos 6 to come).  Blue Onyx is based upon 
Blue Quartz but has gone much further. BQ provided a firm base and now the core 
developers have done a great job of making it all work better and better.  Hope 
that helps. -Stephanie  From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it 
[mailto:blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Alex Jake
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 1:31 AM
To: blueo...@blueonyx.it
Subject: [BlueOnyx:07819] BlueOnyx vs BlueQuartz Hi,

Could someone tell me please what are the differences between BlueOnyx and 
BlueQuartz,
i.e. what does BlueOnyx come with that BlueQuartz doesn't, for example, in the 
GUI under
"Personal Profile" there is "PHPMyAdmin" and "WebMail" with BlueOnyx, what 
other GUI
differences (options) are there please.

Thank You,

AJ.
___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx   
  ___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07821] Re: BlueOnyx vs BlueQuartz

2011-07-24 Thread Stephanie Sullivan
Alex,

 

BQ is based on Centos4. BX is on Centos 5 and just coming out on Scientific
Linux 6 (and maybe on Centos 6 to come).  Blue Onyx is based upon Blue
Quartz but has gone much further. BQ provided a firm base and now the core
developers have done a great job of making it all work better and better. 

 

Hope that helps.

 

-Stephanie 

 

From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it
[mailto:blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Alex Jake
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 1:31 AM
To: blueo...@blueonyx.it
Subject: [BlueOnyx:07819] BlueOnyx vs BlueQuartz

 

Hi,

Could someone tell me please what are the differences between BlueOnyx and
BlueQuartz,
i.e. what does BlueOnyx come with that BlueQuartz doesn't, for example, in
the GUI under
"Personal Profile" there is "PHPMyAdmin" and "WebMail" with BlueOnyx, what
other GUI
differences (options) are there please.

Thank You,

AJ.

___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07820] Re: BlueOnyx vs BlueQuartz

2011-07-24 Thread Ralf Quint
At 10:30 PM 7/24/2011, Alex Jake wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Could someone tell me please what are the differences between 
>BlueOnyx and BlueQuartz,
>i.e. what does BlueOnyx come with that BlueQuartz doesn't,

Most of all, an  active mailing list, frequent updates and a 
reasonably new Linux kernel to begin with...

For all practical purposes, BlueQuartz is dead for years now...

Ralf

___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07819] BlueOnyx vs BlueQuartz

2011-07-24 Thread Alex Jake

Hi,

Could someone tell me please what are the differences between BlueOnyx and 
BlueQuartz,
i.e. what does BlueOnyx come with that BlueQuartz doesn't, for example, in the 
GUI under
"Personal Profile" there is "PHPMyAdmin" and "WebMail" with BlueOnyx, what 
other GUI
differences (options) are there please.

Thank You,

AJ.
  ___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07818] Re: 5107R Beta - Yum Repo files in oldrepofiles folder?

2011-07-24 Thread Jim Scott
Thanks Michael,

> Yeah, sorry about that. We recently released an update to 5107R only, which
> had a really negative effect on the repository files. Just move everything
> from /etc/yum.repos.d/oldrepos/ back into /etc/yum.repos.d/ and you should be
> fine again.
>
> I had hoped that the short presence of that bad update didn't affect too many
> people.
>
> If in doubt if everything is fixed again, you can do this (only on 5107R):
>
> * 5107R only!  * 5107R only!  * 5107R only! 
>
> Do a "ls -la /etc/yum.repos.d/" to check which repository files you have in
> /etc/yum.repos.d/
>
> It should look like this:
>
> [root@5107r ]# ls -la /etc/yum.repos.d/
> total 40
> drwxr-xr-x  2 root root  4096 Jul 20 17:38 .
> drwxr-xr-x 99 root root 12288 Jul 24 22:10 ..
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root   733 Jul 12 20:06 0_WARNING.txt
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root   297 Jul 24 19:40 BlueOnyx.repo
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root  1995 Feb 24 15:13 sl.repo
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root  1291 Feb 24 15:13 sl-updates.repo
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root   275 Jul 12 04:27 Solarspeed-BlueOnyx.repo
>
> If it doesn't look like this, then remove all *.repo files from it and then
> reinstall the correct YUM repository files by reinstalling the respective RPMs
> that contain them:
>
> rpm -hUv --force
> ftp://ftp2.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6/i386/os/Packages/sl-
> release-6.0-6.0.1.i686.rpm
>
> rpm -hUv --force
> http://updates.blueonyx.it/pub/BlueOnyx/5106R/CentOS6/blueonyx/i386/RPMS/blueonyx-
> yumconf-2.0.0-3.i386.rpm
>
> rpm -hUv --force
> http://updates.blueonyx.it/pub/BlueOnyx/5106R/CentOS6/blueonyx/i386/RPMS/solarspeed-
> blueonyx-repo-1.0.0-SOL3.i386.rpm
>
> IF - and only if - this is VPS created from a BlueOnyx 5107R OS template, then
> you may want to reinstall this repository as well (not needed for the 5107R CD
> install!):
>
> rpm -hUv --force
> http://blueonyx.solarspeed.net/pub/BlueOnyx/5106R/CentOS6/blueonyx/i386/RPMS/solarspeed-
> blueonyx-repo-1.0.0-SOL3.i386.rpm
>
> We didn't release this update for 5106R, so those aren't affected and they do
> use different YUM repositories anyway. So pretty please, NOBODY run the above
> commands on a 5106R box, or that will cause wrecking damage.
>

Here is what my directory had just as an FYI. I will do as you stated 
and remove and install as you suggested.

-rw-r-  1 root root  360 Jul 24 17:51 BlueOnyx.repo
-rw-r-  1 root root  431 Jul 19 15:43 sl-fastbugs.repo
-rw-r-  1 root root  390 Jul 19 15:43 sl.repo
-rw-r-  1 root root  432 Jul 19 15:43 sl-security.repo
-rw-r-  1 root root  393 Jul 19 15:43 sl-source.repo
-rw-r-  1 root root  408 Jul 19 15:43 sl-testing.repo
-rw-r-  1 root root  408 Jul 19 15:43 sl-testing-source.repo
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1291 Feb 24 12:13 sl-updates.repo
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root  275 Jul 12 01:27 Solarspeed-BlueOnyx.repo
___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07817] Re: 5107R Beta - Yum Repo files in oldrepofiles folder?

2011-07-24 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi Jim,

> I just tried to do a yum update from shell and nothing was available 
> even though Michael had indicated he updated the repository. I looked in 
> /etc/yum.repos.d/ and it was empty with a folder called oldrepofiles. 
> Looking in it I see BlueOnyx.repo and other files. I moved the 
> BlueOnyx.repo to the /etc/respos.d/ folder and then after doing a yum 
> update I can see a whole bunch of updates available.

Yeah, sorry about that. We recently released an update to 5107R only, which 
had a really negative effect on the repository files. Just move everything 
from /etc/yum.repos.d/oldrepos/ back into /etc/yum.repos.d/ and you should be 
fine again.

I had hoped that the short presence of that bad update didn't affect too many 
people. 

If in doubt if everything is fixed again, you can do this (only on 5107R):

* 5107R only!  * 5107R only!  * 5107R only! 

Do a "ls -la /etc/yum.repos.d/" to check which repository files you have in 
/etc/yum.repos.d/

It should look like this:

[root@5107r ]# ls -la /etc/yum.repos.d/
total 40
drwxr-xr-x  2 root root  4096 Jul 20 17:38 .
drwxr-xr-x 99 root root 12288 Jul 24 22:10 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 root root   733 Jul 12 20:06 0_WARNING.txt
-rw-r--r--  1 root root   297 Jul 24 19:40 BlueOnyx.repo
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  1995 Feb 24 15:13 sl.repo
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  1291 Feb 24 15:13 sl-updates.repo
-rw-r--r--  1 root root   275 Jul 12 04:27 Solarspeed-BlueOnyx.repo

If it doesn't look like this, then remove all *.repo files from it and then 
reinstall the correct YUM repository files by reinstalling the respective RPMs 
that contain them:

rpm -hUv --force 
ftp://ftp2.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6/i386/os/Packages/sl-
release-6.0-6.0.1.i686.rpm

rpm -hUv --force 
http://updates.blueonyx.it/pub/BlueOnyx/5106R/CentOS6/blueonyx/i386/RPMS/blueonyx-
yumconf-2.0.0-3.i386.rpm

rpm -hUv --force 
http://updates.blueonyx.it/pub/BlueOnyx/5106R/CentOS6/blueonyx/i386/RPMS/solarspeed-
blueonyx-repo-1.0.0-SOL3.i386.rpm

IF - and only if - this is VPS created from a BlueOnyx 5107R OS template, then 
you may want to reinstall this repository as well (not needed for the 5107R CD 
install!):

rpm -hUv --force 
http://blueonyx.solarspeed.net/pub/BlueOnyx/5106R/CentOS6/blueonyx/i386/RPMS/solarspeed-
blueonyx-repo-1.0.0-SOL3.i386.rpm

We didn't release this update for 5106R, so those aren't affected and they do 
use different YUM repositories anyway. So pretty please, NOBODY run the above 
commands on a 5106R box, or that will cause wrecking damage.

-- 
With best regards

Michael Stauber
___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07816] Re: Open cart and umask

2011-07-24 Thread Darrell D. Mobley
That's reason to celebrate!

> -Original Message-
> From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Stephanie Sullivan
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 7:22 PM
> To: 'BlueOnyx General Mailing List'
> Subject: [BlueOnyx:07813] Re: Open cart and umask
> 
> Darrell,
> 
> I went to the suphp site and it appears not at present. However, I think
> this is a reasonable feature request to them as they have a mechanism for
> setting uid/gid and several other settings on a per-vsite basis.
> 
>   Thanks,
>   -Stephanie
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> > boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Darrell D. Mobley
> > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 7:02 PM
> > To: 'BlueOnyx General Mailing List'
> > Subject: [BlueOnyx:07810] Re: Open cart and umask
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> > > boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Michael Stauber
> > > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 5:31 PM
> > > To: BlueOnyx General Mailing List
> > > Subject: [BlueOnyx:07809] Re: Open cart and umask
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > > I'll toy a bit around with su_php and will release an update
> > tonight
> > > that
> > > > should take  care of the umask issue.
> > >
> > > Ok, an update suphp RPM has been released for 5106R and 5107R. The
> > default
> > > umask is now 022.
> >
> > Stephanie's post said:
> >
> > > In /etc/suphp.conf I made the following change.
> > >
> > > ; [original] umask=0077
> > > umask=0002
> >
> > Is 022 what is correct?  Any way to have suphp.conf for individual
> > sites?
> >
> > ___
> > Blueonyx mailing list
> > Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
> > http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
> 
> ___
> Blueonyx mailing list
> Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
> http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx

___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07815] 5107R Beta - Yum Repo files in oldrepofiles folder?

2011-07-24 Thread Jim Scott
I just tried to do a yum update from shell and nothing was available 
even though Michael had indicated he updated the repository. I looked in 
/etc/yum.repos.d/ and it was empty with a folder called oldrepofiles. 
Looking in it I see BlueOnyx.repo and other files. I moved the 
BlueOnyx.repo to the /etc/respos.d/ folder and then after doing a yum 
update I can see a whole bunch of updates available.

Is this right?
___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07814] Re: Shell-Tools not working?

2011-07-24 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi Jim,

> > [root@bo2 perl]# caddvsite
> > caddvsite: unrecognized option `--quick'
> 
> Should also mention this is the 5017R Beta

Thanks for the info! I just found the problem and released a fix to the 5107R 
YUM repository.

-- 
With best regards

Michael Stauber
___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07813] Re: Open cart and umask

2011-07-24 Thread Stephanie Sullivan
Darrell,

I went to the suphp site and it appears not at present. However, I think
this is a reasonable feature request to them as they have a mechanism for
setting uid/gid and several other settings on a per-vsite basis.

Thanks,
-Stephanie

> -Original Message-
> From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Darrell D. Mobley
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 7:02 PM
> To: 'BlueOnyx General Mailing List'
> Subject: [BlueOnyx:07810] Re: Open cart and umask
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> > boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Michael Stauber
> > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 5:31 PM
> > To: BlueOnyx General Mailing List
> > Subject: [BlueOnyx:07809] Re: Open cart and umask
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > > I'll toy a bit around with su_php and will release an update
> tonight
> > that
> > > should take  care of the umask issue.
> >
> > Ok, an update suphp RPM has been released for 5106R and 5107R. The
> default
> > umask is now 022.
> 
> Stephanie's post said:
> 
> > In /etc/suphp.conf I made the following change.
> >
> > ; [original] umask=0077
> > umask=0002
> 
> Is 022 what is correct?  Any way to have suphp.conf for individual
> sites?
> 
> ___
> Blueonyx mailing list
> Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
> http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx

___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07812] Re: Open cart and umask

2011-07-24 Thread Stephanie Sullivan
Michael,

You saw my rant and raised me with amazing response. This a poker game
everyone has won - thanks to you!

Thanks,
-Stephanie

> -Original Message-
> From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Michael Stauber
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 5:31 PM
> To: BlueOnyx General Mailing List
> Subject: [BlueOnyx:07809] Re: Open cart and umask
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> > I'll toy a bit around with su_php and will release an update
> tonight that
> > should take  care of the umask issue.
> 
> Ok, an update suphp RPM has been released for 5106R and 5107R. The
> default
> umask is now 022.
> 
> --
> With best regards
> 
> Michael Stauber
> ___
> Blueonyx mailing list
> Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
> http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx

___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07811] Re: Open cart and umask

2011-07-24 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi Darrel,

> Is 022 what is correct?

I suppose so. It translates to 644, which is at least what we'd need to allow 
Apache to make the new files publically accessible.

> Any way to have suphp.conf for individual sites?

That's the long term goal, yes. But as of now I don't have a viable solution 
which would work for us.

-- 
With best regards

Michael Stauber
___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx



[BlueOnyx:07810] Re: Open cart and umask

2011-07-24 Thread Darrell D. Mobley
> -Original Message-
> From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Michael Stauber
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 5:31 PM
> To: BlueOnyx General Mailing List
> Subject: [BlueOnyx:07809] Re: Open cart and umask
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> > I'll toy a bit around with su_php and will release an update tonight
> that
> > should take  care of the umask issue.
> 
> Ok, an update suphp RPM has been released for 5106R and 5107R. The default
> umask is now 022.

Stephanie's post said:

> In /etc/suphp.conf I made the following change.
> 
> ; [original] umask=0077
> umask=0002

Is 022 what is correct?  Any way to have suphp.conf for individual sites?

___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07809] Re: Open cart and umask

2011-07-24 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi all,

> I'll toy a bit around with su_php and will release an update tonight that
> should take  care of the umask issue.

Ok, an update suphp RPM has been released for 5106R and 5107R. The default 
umask is now 022.

-- 
With best regards

Michael Stauber
___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07808] Re: Open cart and umask

2011-07-24 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi Stephanie,

> Is channeling president Clinton the best direction to head an issue like
> this? ;-)

Hahaha. No idea, but let's get the stain off the dress and we'll see. I'll toy 
a bit around with su_php and will release an update tonight that should take 
care of the umask issue.

-- 
With best regards

Michael Stauber
___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07807] Re: Open cart and umask

2011-07-24 Thread Darrell D. Mobley
Only one way to find out. :-)

> -Original Message-
> From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Stephanie Sullivan
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 2:47 PM
> To: 'BlueOnyx General Mailing List'
> Subject: [BlueOnyx:07806] Re: Open cart and umask
> 
> Is channeling president Clinton the best direction to head an issue like
> this? ;-)
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> > boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Darrell D. Mobley
> > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 2:26 PM
> > To: 'BlueOnyx General Mailing List'
> > Subject: [BlueOnyx:07805] Re: Open cart and umask
> >
> > I feel your pain. :-)
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> > > boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Stephanie Sullivan
> > > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 1:06 PM
> > > To: 'BlueOnyx General Mailing List'
> > > Subject: [BlueOnyx:07804] Re: Open cart and umask
> > >
> > > Let me answer my own question. I'm trying to make files created
> > have
> > > default
> > > permissions allowing group write and others read. The default allow
> > rwx
> > > for
> > > the owner and nothing for anyone else. Sigh.
> > >
> > > In /etc/suphp.conf I made the following change.
> > >
> > > ; [original] umask=0077
> > > umask=0002
> > >
> > > This mask also allows execute as suphp created directories lacked
> > execute
> > > permissions locking out apache from getting php generated images
> > from the
> > > folder created by suphp. Sigh.
> > >
> > > May I suggest that files created under suphp might at least, by
> > default,
> > > allow for file creation with group read write execute, and global
> > (other)
> > > read and execute. This way suphp created directories and files
> > (like
> > > images)
> > > will be readable by apache.
> > >
> > > Now, to be clear - I like the more restrictive permissions. The
> > work fine
> > > as
> > > long as suphp is reading the files. But if access is to be from
> > apache as
> > > for an image created by suphp, no-go.
> > >
> > > One can add a chmod() php call to the code that creates the files
> > or a
> > > umask() php call to change the default. Great for code I write. I
> > like it.
> > > But much of what runs on my servers is from elsewhere - shopping
> > carts,
> > > CMS's, etc. and many of these create files and feel adding chmod()
> > to the
> > > code is an onerous requirement. I can add this in but then an
> > update comes
> > > out and undoes my fix. I'm sure you all know the cycle...
> > >
> > > So, that's my rant for today. At the risk of being a PITA - if
> > there is a
> > > way (and I haven't researched it yet) to set the suphp umask on
> > per-site
> > > basis I'll start to dance in delight.
> > >
> > > Thank you all for your attention. If you have opinions or thoughts
> > I am
> > > all
> > > ears.
> > >
> > >   Thanks,
> > >   -Stephanie
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> > > > boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Stephanie Sullivan
> > > > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 8:40 AM
> > > > To: 'BlueOnyx General Mailing List'
> > > > Subject: [BlueOnyx:07803] Open cart and umask
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone used opencart on BX? The reason I ask is I've
> > installed it
> > > > -
> > > > easy-peasy. I enabled suphp and set site ownership.
> > > >
> > > > One problem that in many mentions in their forums always gets
> > blamed
> > > > on the
> > > > hosting company. The default file creation permissions appear to
> > be
> > > > 600.
> > > > This is not ideal as an image created cannot be read by apache
> > and
> > > > give a
> > > > permissions error (more specifically it does not display the
> > image in
> > > > the
> > > > page though it's there.
> > > >
> > > > Is there a way (I could not find it at php.net) to change the
> > default
> > > > umask
> > > > for files created using suphp? I think there must be a reasonable
> > way
> > > > as all
> > > > the forum threads that ended with "go complain to your web
> > hosting
> > > > company"
> > > > stopped there. None of them had a follow-up of the web hosting
> > > > company
> > > > telling them they were nuts.
> > > >
> > > > I know there is a umask() function in php. I understand that.
> > What
> > > > I'm
> > > > looking for is a setting that will not require me to rewrite php
> > from
> > > > an
> > > > installed shopping cart I'll want my users to use.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe the answer here is obvious. I don't know.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -Stephanie
> > > >
> > > > PS - opencart seems much easier to work with than
> > > > oscommerce/oscmax/zencart
> > > > AND validates with the default theme as full XHTML strict with
> > SEO
> > > > friendly
> > > > URLs to boot!
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Blueonyx mailing list

[BlueOnyx:07806] Re: Open cart and umask

2011-07-24 Thread Stephanie Sullivan
Is channeling president Clinton the best direction to head an issue like
this? ;-)

> -Original Message-
> From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Darrell D. Mobley
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 2:26 PM
> To: 'BlueOnyx General Mailing List'
> Subject: [BlueOnyx:07805] Re: Open cart and umask
> 
> I feel your pain. :-)
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> > boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Stephanie Sullivan
> > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 1:06 PM
> > To: 'BlueOnyx General Mailing List'
> > Subject: [BlueOnyx:07804] Re: Open cart and umask
> >
> > Let me answer my own question. I'm trying to make files created
> have
> > default
> > permissions allowing group write and others read. The default allow
> rwx
> > for
> > the owner and nothing for anyone else. Sigh.
> >
> > In /etc/suphp.conf I made the following change.
> >
> > ; [original] umask=0077
> > umask=0002
> >
> > This mask also allows execute as suphp created directories lacked
> execute
> > permissions locking out apache from getting php generated images
> from the
> > folder created by suphp. Sigh.
> >
> > May I suggest that files created under suphp might at least, by
> default,
> > allow for file creation with group read write execute, and global
> (other)
> > read and execute. This way suphp created directories and files
> (like
> > images)
> > will be readable by apache.
> >
> > Now, to be clear - I like the more restrictive permissions. The
> work fine
> > as
> > long as suphp is reading the files. But if access is to be from
> apache as
> > for an image created by suphp, no-go.
> >
> > One can add a chmod() php call to the code that creates the files
> or a
> > umask() php call to change the default. Great for code I write. I
> like it.
> > But much of what runs on my servers is from elsewhere - shopping
> carts,
> > CMS's, etc. and many of these create files and feel adding chmod()
> to the
> > code is an onerous requirement. I can add this in but then an
> update comes
> > out and undoes my fix. I'm sure you all know the cycle...
> >
> > So, that's my rant for today. At the risk of being a PITA - if
> there is a
> > way (and I haven't researched it yet) to set the suphp umask on
> per-site
> > basis I'll start to dance in delight.
> >
> > Thank you all for your attention. If you have opinions or thoughts
> I am
> > all
> > ears.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Stephanie
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> > > boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Stephanie Sullivan
> > > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 8:40 AM
> > > To: 'BlueOnyx General Mailing List'
> > > Subject: [BlueOnyx:07803] Open cart and umask
> > >
> > > Has anyone used opencart on BX? The reason I ask is I've
> installed it
> > > -
> > > easy-peasy. I enabled suphp and set site ownership.
> > >
> > > One problem that in many mentions in their forums always gets
> blamed
> > > on the
> > > hosting company. The default file creation permissions appear to
> be
> > > 600.
> > > This is not ideal as an image created cannot be read by apache
> and
> > > give a
> > > permissions error (more specifically it does not display the
> image in
> > > the
> > > page though it's there.
> > >
> > > Is there a way (I could not find it at php.net) to change the
> default
> > > umask
> > > for files created using suphp? I think there must be a reasonable
> way
> > > as all
> > > the forum threads that ended with "go complain to your web
> hosting
> > > company"
> > > stopped there. None of them had a follow-up of the web hosting
> > > company
> > > telling them they were nuts.
> > >
> > > I know there is a umask() function in php. I understand that.
> What
> > > I'm
> > > looking for is a setting that will not require me to rewrite php
> from
> > > an
> > > installed shopping cart I'll want my users to use.
> > >
> > > Maybe the answer here is obvious. I don't know.
> > >
> > >   Thanks,
> > >   -Stephanie
> > >
> > > PS - opencart seems much easier to work with than
> > > oscommerce/oscmax/zencart
> > > AND validates with the default theme as full XHTML strict with
> SEO
> > > friendly
> > > URLs to boot!
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Blueonyx mailing list
> > > Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
> > > http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
> >
> > ___
> > Blueonyx mailing list
> > Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
> > http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
> 
> ___
> Blueonyx mailing list
> Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
> http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx

___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07805] Re: Open cart and umask

2011-07-24 Thread Darrell D. Mobley
I feel your pain. :-)

> -Original Message-
> From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Stephanie Sullivan
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 1:06 PM
> To: 'BlueOnyx General Mailing List'
> Subject: [BlueOnyx:07804] Re: Open cart and umask
> 
> Let me answer my own question. I'm trying to make files created have
> default
> permissions allowing group write and others read. The default allow rwx
> for
> the owner and nothing for anyone else. Sigh.
> 
> In /etc/suphp.conf I made the following change.
> 
> ; [original] umask=0077
> umask=0002
> 
> This mask also allows execute as suphp created directories lacked execute
> permissions locking out apache from getting php generated images from the
> folder created by suphp. Sigh.
> 
> May I suggest that files created under suphp might at least, by default,
> allow for file creation with group read write execute, and global (other)
> read and execute. This way suphp created directories and files (like
> images)
> will be readable by apache.
> 
> Now, to be clear - I like the more restrictive permissions. The work fine
> as
> long as suphp is reading the files. But if access is to be from apache as
> for an image created by suphp, no-go.
> 
> One can add a chmod() php call to the code that creates the files or a
> umask() php call to change the default. Great for code I write. I like it.
> But much of what runs on my servers is from elsewhere - shopping carts,
> CMS's, etc. and many of these create files and feel adding chmod() to the
> code is an onerous requirement. I can add this in but then an update comes
> out and undoes my fix. I'm sure you all know the cycle...
> 
> So, that's my rant for today. At the risk of being a PITA - if there is a
> way (and I haven't researched it yet) to set the suphp umask on per-site
> basis I'll start to dance in delight.
> 
> Thank you all for your attention. If you have opinions or thoughts I am
> all
> ears.
> 
>   Thanks,
>   -Stephanie
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> > boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Stephanie Sullivan
> > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 8:40 AM
> > To: 'BlueOnyx General Mailing List'
> > Subject: [BlueOnyx:07803] Open cart and umask
> >
> > Has anyone used opencart on BX? The reason I ask is I've installed it
> > -
> > easy-peasy. I enabled suphp and set site ownership.
> >
> > One problem that in many mentions in their forums always gets blamed
> > on the
> > hosting company. The default file creation permissions appear to be
> > 600.
> > This is not ideal as an image created cannot be read by apache and
> > give a
> > permissions error (more specifically it does not display the image in
> > the
> > page though it's there.
> >
> > Is there a way (I could not find it at php.net) to change the default
> > umask
> > for files created using suphp? I think there must be a reasonable way
> > as all
> > the forum threads that ended with "go complain to your web hosting
> > company"
> > stopped there. None of them had a follow-up of the web hosting
> > company
> > telling them they were nuts.
> >
> > I know there is a umask() function in php. I understand that. What
> > I'm
> > looking for is a setting that will not require me to rewrite php from
> > an
> > installed shopping cart I'll want my users to use.
> >
> > Maybe the answer here is obvious. I don't know.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Stephanie
> >
> > PS - opencart seems much easier to work with than
> > oscommerce/oscmax/zencart
> > AND validates with the default theme as full XHTML strict with SEO
> > friendly
> > URLs to boot!
> >
> > ___
> > Blueonyx mailing list
> > Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
> > http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
> 
> ___
> Blueonyx mailing list
> Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
> http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx

___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07804] Re: Open cart and umask

2011-07-24 Thread Stephanie Sullivan
Let me answer my own question. I'm trying to make files created have default
permissions allowing group write and others read. The default allow rwx for
the owner and nothing for anyone else. Sigh. 

In /etc/suphp.conf I made the following change.

; [original] umask=0077
umask=0002

This mask also allows execute as suphp created directories lacked execute
permissions locking out apache from getting php generated images from the
folder created by suphp. Sigh.

May I suggest that files created under suphp might at least, by default,
allow for file creation with group read write execute, and global (other)
read and execute. This way suphp created directories and files (like images)
will be readable by apache.

Now, to be clear - I like the more restrictive permissions. The work fine as
long as suphp is reading the files. But if access is to be from apache as
for an image created by suphp, no-go. 

One can add a chmod() php call to the code that creates the files or a
umask() php call to change the default. Great for code I write. I like it.
But much of what runs on my servers is from elsewhere - shopping carts,
CMS's, etc. and many of these create files and feel adding chmod() to the
code is an onerous requirement. I can add this in but then an update comes
out and undoes my fix. I'm sure you all know the cycle...

So, that's my rant for today. At the risk of being a PITA - if there is a
way (and I haven't researched it yet) to set the suphp umask on per-site
basis I'll start to dance in delight.

Thank you all for your attention. If you have opinions or thoughts I am all
ears.

Thanks,
-Stephanie



> -Original Message-
> From: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it [mailto:blueonyx-
> boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] On Behalf Of Stephanie Sullivan
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 8:40 AM
> To: 'BlueOnyx General Mailing List'
> Subject: [BlueOnyx:07803] Open cart and umask
> 
> Has anyone used opencart on BX? The reason I ask is I've installed it
> -
> easy-peasy. I enabled suphp and set site ownership.
> 
> One problem that in many mentions in their forums always gets blamed
> on the
> hosting company. The default file creation permissions appear to be
> 600.
> This is not ideal as an image created cannot be read by apache and
> give a
> permissions error (more specifically it does not display the image in
> the
> page though it's there.
> 
> Is there a way (I could not find it at php.net) to change the default
> umask
> for files created using suphp? I think there must be a reasonable way
> as all
> the forum threads that ended with "go complain to your web hosting
> company"
> stopped there. None of them had a follow-up of the web hosting
> company
> telling them they were nuts.
> 
> I know there is a umask() function in php. I understand that. What
> I'm
> looking for is a setting that will not require me to rewrite php from
> an
> installed shopping cart I'll want my users to use.
> 
> Maybe the answer here is obvious. I don't know.
> 
>   Thanks,
>   -Stephanie
> 
> PS - opencart seems much easier to work with than
> oscommerce/oscmax/zencart
> AND validates with the default theme as full XHTML strict with SEO
> friendly
> URLs to boot!
> 
> ___
> Blueonyx mailing list
> Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
> http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx

___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07803] Open cart and umask

2011-07-24 Thread Stephanie Sullivan
Has anyone used opencart on BX? The reason I ask is I've installed it -
easy-peasy. I enabled suphp and set site ownership.

One problem that in many mentions in their forums always gets blamed on the
hosting company. The default file creation permissions appear to be 600.
This is not ideal as an image created cannot be read by apache and give a
permissions error (more specifically it does not display the image in the
page though it's there. 

Is there a way (I could not find it at php.net) to change the default umask
for files created using suphp? I think there must be a reasonable way as all
the forum threads that ended with "go complain to your web hosting company"
stopped there. None of them had a follow-up of the web hosting company
telling them they were nuts.

I know there is a umask() function in php. I understand that. What I'm
looking for is a setting that will not require me to rewrite php from an
installed shopping cart I'll want my users to use.

Maybe the answer here is obvious. I don't know.

Thanks,
-Stephanie

PS - opencart seems much easier to work with than oscommerce/oscmax/zencart
AND validates with the default theme as full XHTML strict with SEO friendly
URLs to boot!

___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07802] Re: Could not connect to /usr/sausalito/cced.socket:No such file or directory

2011-07-24 Thread Colin Jack


> I have started seeing this on one of my BX servers today:

> Cron  /usr/sbin/swatch -c /etc/swatch.conf

> Could not connect to /usr/sausalito/cced.socket: No such file or directory

> I have restarted cced.init - ran up no errors
> Ran swatch - no errors
> GUI all looks fine - status says everything is fine

> Anybody able to shed any light? Been fine up until now.

> Colin


A bit more info ...

I checked and /usr/cced.socket is there - I deleted it and restarted cced.init 
and it recreated cced.socket okay.

Colin
___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx


[BlueOnyx:07801] Could not connect to /usr/sausalito/cced.socket: No such file or directory

2011-07-24 Thread Colin Jack
I have started seeing this on one of my BX servers today:

Cron  /usr/sbin/swatch -c /etc/swatch.conf

Could not connect to /usr/sausalito/cced.socket: No such file or directory

I have restarted cced.init - ran up no errors
Ran swatch - no errors
GUI all looks fine - status says everything is fine

Anybody able to shed any light? Been fine up until now.

Colin





___
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx