Re: [board-discuss] [VOTE] LibreOffice Online freeze-related decisions
Sorry, thought I already did answer in this vote, but there were some remarks from Emiliano, so: Still +1 also for the clarification of Emiliano throughout, because with the latest infos from Guilhem and as we then do not have another tooling / play ground in TDF for acquiring new contributors this makes sense to me. Best Lothar Am 05.02.2021 um 14:26 schrieb Emiliano Vavassori: Il 02/02/21 18:10, Daniel Armando Rodriguez ha scritto: Hi, I think it's pretty clear that several BoD members, me included, have misunderstood the implication of such vote. Especially 1b. So, my take is to vote on Guilhems proposal, detailed bellow. Which I support. "rewind branches on https://git.libreoffice.org/online and for the time being deny all write operations to the repository, be it on the git or gerrit side. It'll freeze the state of the dashboard, notification, and other clones for free, and if/when we decide to accept contributions again everything will be just one switch away." +1, but I think the proposal misses some bits. I'll try to cope with them: * branches will be rewinded to commit (or the commits before) 4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864 (last commit before changes by Collabora) * OpenGrok needs to point to the TDF git/gerrit * revert decision 1b and (if feasible) point TDF repo on GitHub on git/gerrit on TDF infra. After this bits, I think this whole votes needs another round of confirmation - to be sure that also these bits are consensual. Cheers, -- Lothar K. Becker, Member of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint mail: lot...@documentfoundation.org phone: +49 7202 9499 001 (c/o .riess applications gmbh) -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] LibreOffice Online freeze-related decisions
Hi Emiliano, On Fri, 05 Feb 2021 at 14:26:53 +0100, Emiliano Vavassori wrote: > * revert decision 1b and (if feasible) point TDF repo on GitHub on > git/gerrit on TDF infra. Other BoD members are already voting on this but I have trouble understanding what that means. From https://listarchives.tdf.io/i/gVuesWC6ZI0MUequqiqJ3nrc | 1b. to switch the https://github.com/libreoffice/online mirror to | instead mirror the Collabora repo, for the time being, and make sure we | catch pull requests there, e.g. via the mentoring alias on TDF side Before that https://github.com/libreoffice/online was a read-only mirror for https://git.libreoffice.org/online , so by “revert decision 1b” I guess you mean to make it so again? Should both this and https://listarchives.tdf.io/i/IbatXLjaK38BCbLBNiiw7Ned be approved, this would mean that the tip of the master branch on both https://git.libreoffice.org/online and https://github.com/libreoffice/online would point to 4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864^. (As was the case between the Oct 1 and the implementation of the aforementioned BoD decision.) But what do you mean by the second part of your proposal: “(if feasible) point TDF repo on GitHub on git/gerrit on TDF infra”? I can't think of an interpretation that's not already covered by “revert decision 1b”. Cheers -- Guilhem. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [board-discuss] [VOTE] LibreOffice Online freeze-related decisions
Emiliano Vavassori wrote on 05/02/2021 14:26: > +1, but I think the proposal misses some bits. I'll try to cope with them: > > * branches will be rewinded to commit (or the commits before) > 4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864 (last commit before changes by > Collabora) > * OpenGrok needs to point to the TDF git/gerrit > * revert decision 1b and (if feasible) point TDF repo on GitHub on > git/gerrit on TDF infra. Thanks for writing that down. And fine for me. We all see it as an intermediate state, and want to work on 'the future' :) Cheers, Cor -- Cor Nouws, member Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28 A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6 mobile : +31 (0)6 25 20 7001 skype : cornouws blog: cor4office-nl.blogspot.com jabber : cor4off...@jabber.org -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] LibreOffice Online freeze-related decisions
Il 10/02/21 13:08, Guilhem Moulin ha scritto: > Before that https://github.com/libreoffice/online was a read-only mirror > for https://git.libreoffice.org/online , so by “revert decision 1b” I > guess you mean to make it so again? Should both this and > https://listarchives.tdf.io/i/IbatXLjaK38BCbLBNiiw7Ned be approved, this > would mean that the tip of the master branch on both > https://git.libreoffice.org/online and https://github.com/libreoffice/online > would point to 4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864^. (As was the > case between the Oct 1 and the implementation of the aforementioned BoD > decision.) That's exactly what I propose, in a much richer and precise description. > But what do you mean by the second part of your proposal: “(if feasible) > point TDF repo on GitHub on git/gerrit on TDF infra”? I can't think of > an interpretation that's not already covered by “revert decision 1b”. Indeed. The second part of the phrase was only meant to explicitly state what is going to happen in the end (including the technical clearance to do it). "Revert decision 1b" should be quite clear by itself. As stated (elsewhere), I intend these modifications as a temporary way until a definitive and shared way will be decided by the Board. Cheers, -- Emiliano Vavassori, Member of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] LibreOffice Online freeze-related decisions
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 15:22:06 +0100, Emiliano Vavassori wrote: >> But what do you mean by the second part of your proposal: “(if feasible) >> point TDF repo on GitHub on git/gerrit on TDF infra”? I can't think of >> an interpretation that's not already covered by “revert decision 1b”. > > Indeed. The second part of the phrase was only meant to explicitly state > what is going to happen in the end (including the technical clearance to > do it). "Revert decision 1b" should be quite clear by itself. Ack, thanks for clarifying! Part of the confusion was that some of you voted in favor of 1b then in favor of reverting it, but well I guess everyone is allowed to change their opinion :-) > As stated (elsewhere), I intend these modifications as a temporary way > until a definitive and shared way will be decided by the Board. Thank you for spelling this out. -- Guilhem. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[board-discuss] [DECISION] LibreOffice Online freeze-related decisions
Hello, The Board of Directors at the time of voting consists of 7 seat holders (not including deputies). In order to be quorate, the vote needs to have 1/2 or more of the Board of Directors members, which gives 4. A total of 7 Board of Directors members have participated in the vote. The vote is quorate. A quorum could be reached with a simple majority of 4 votes. Emiliano Vavassori wrote on 05.02.21 at 14:26: "rewind branches onhttps://git.libreoffice.org/online and for the time being deny all write operations to the repository, be it on the git or gerrit side. It'll freeze the state of the dashboard, notification, and other clones for free, and if/when we decide to accept contributions again everything will be just one switch away." +1, but I think the proposal misses some bits. I'll try to cope with them: * branches will be rewinded to commit (or the commits before) 4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864 (last commit before changes by Collabora) Result of vote: 6 approvals, 1 abstain, 0 disapprovals. One deputy is in favor. Decision: The proposal has been accepted. * OpenGrok needs to point to the TDF git/gerrit Result of vote: 6 approvals, 1 abstain, 0 disapprovals. One deputy is in favor. Decision: The proposal has been accepted. * revert decision 1b and (if feasible) point TDF repo on GitHub on git/gerrit on TDF infra. Result of vote: 5 approvals, 1 abstain, 1 disapproval. One deputy is in favor. Decision: The proposal has been accepted. Florian -- Florian Effenberger, Executive Director (Geschäftsführer) Tel: +49 30 5557992-50 | Mail: flo...@documentfoundation.org The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
[board-discuss] Updated representation statement Thorsten Behrens
I, Thorsten Behrens, elected member of the Board of Directors of The Document Foundation, hereby and until further notice, nominate the following deputy to represent me during board calls and meetings: 1. Nicolas Christener All the best, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: PGP signature
