Re: [boost] stlport gcc support
Martin Wille wrote: Yes, that is why I didn't add more STLport configurations to the tests, yet. However, STLport's support for debugging is certainly an interesting feature to use for many developers. So, there would still be good use for STLport with recent gcc versions. This is exactly our situation. Our target applications actually run on an embedded coldfire board. At this point, we're constrained to a gcc-2.95 derived toolchain, no stlport, and no boost ... on the target platform. As time allows, we will be looking into the later toolchain and uClinux distributions. For now we use STLport to support our development environment, simulation, and testing. STLport assertion failures are fairly rare occurrances, but well worth the investment when they do happen. ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Re: [boost] Re: stlport gcc support
RUSSEL HILL wrote: Trey Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ps. On a related note: do people have pointers to documentation on what bugs exist in stlport 4.5.3, i.e. what gcc has fixed? FWIW... Today we managed to get our project over to gcc-3.3.1, STLport-4.5-0119, and boost 1.30.2. There appears to be a disconnect in how boost and STLport handle _PTHREAD vs. BOOST_HAS_PTHREAD. The workaround we used, for now, is to edit stlport/stl/_site_config.h and uncomment the line '#define _PTHREAD'. This seems like something that should be neccesary. Clarification: I meant to say that I thought the workaround should NOT be neccesary and that boost should build with stlport without editing _site_config.h. Teach me to post after a long day... ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Re: [boost] stlport gcc support
Martin Wille wrote: I'm currently considering adding gcc-3.3.1/stlport to the tests. Since we are using boost/stlport/gcc-3.3.1... 1) What kind of resources does it take to run the regression tests? 2) Would it be helpful if we ran them? Could the community make use of our test results? How? So far we aren't actually using a great deal of boost; threads and a shared pointer or two IIRC. ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
