Re: TV comedians target Cheney hunting accident

2006-02-14 Thread G. D. Akin
LOL!

- Original Message - 
From: Robert G. Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:20 PM
Subject: TV comedians target Cheney hunting accident


 Television talk shows took aim Monday at U.S. Vice-President Dick 
 Cheney's accidental weekend shooting in Texas of a hunting companion. 
 Here's a few of the jokes.
 
 Late Show with David Letterman, CBS:
 
 -Good news, ladies and gentlemen, we have finally located weapons of 
 mass destruction: It's Dick Cheney.
 
 -But here is the sad part - before the trip Donald Rumsfeld had 
 denied the guy's request for body armour.
 
 -We can't get (Osama) bin Laden, but we nailed a 78-year-old 
 attorney.
 
 -The guy who got gunned down, he is a Republican lawyer and a big 
 Republican donor and fortunately the buck shot was deflected by wads 
 of laundered cash. So he's fine. He took a little in the wallet.
 
 -
 
 The Tonight Show with Jay Leno, NBC:
 
 -Although it is beautiful here in California, the weather back East 
 has been atrocious. There was so much snow in Washington, D.C., Dick 
 Cheney accidentally shot a fat guy thinking it was a polar bear.
 
 -That's the big story over the weekend. . . . Dick Cheney 
 accidentally shot a fellow hunter, a 78-year-old lawyer. In fact, when 
 people found out he shot a lawyer, his popularity is now at 92 per 
 cent.
 
 -I think Cheney is starting to lose it. After he shot the guy he 
 screamed, 'Anyone else want to call domestic wire tapping illegal?' 
 
 -Dick Cheney is capitalizing on this for Valentine's Day. It's the 
 new Dick Cheney cologne. It's called Duck!
 
 -
 
 The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, Comedy Central:
 
 -Vice-President Dick Cheney accidentally shot a man during a quail 
 hunt . . . making 78-year-old Harry Whittington the first person shot 
 by a sitting veep since Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton, of course, (was) 
 shot in a duel with Aaron Burr over issues of honour, integrity and 
 political manoeuvring. Whittington? Mistaken for a bird.
 
 -Now, this story certainly has its humorous aspects. . . . But it 
 also raises a serious issue, one which I feel very strongly about. . . 
 . moms, dads, if you're watching right now, I can't emphasize this 
 enough: Do not let your kids go on hunting trips with the 
 vice-president. I don't care what kind of lucrative contracts they're 
 trying to land, or energy regulations they're trying to get lifted - 
 it's just not worth it.
 
 
 
 xponent
 
 The Buckshots Here Maru
 
 rob
 
 
 ___
 http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
 
 
 
 





___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Hyperion

2006-02-14 Thread Jim Sharkey

Maru Dubshinki wrote:
I never thought of putting it in per-character terms. I always broke
it down into factions- ie. you had the first timeline, in which
TechnoCore and humand warred, which sent back Mnemosyne; you had the
other timeline with the twin UIs, which dispatched one of the 
shrikes, and you had a third faction which sent back yet *another* 
shrike t fetch Weintraub's daughter (which I suspect to have been 
the Reaper faction). At least, three timelines made the most sense 
to me. I'd be interested to hear your thinking on it.

Hrm.  I think after reading the Endymion books I'd have to add a 
fourth line, wherein the Shrike is there to protect Aenea, possibly
sent by those in the Void.  Though it could be an intercepted and 
altered Shrike from the UIs, or sent by the human UI to defend its 
third part.

The other three you listed make reasonable sense; however, I will 
admit that I never considered the various Shrikes to be separate 
timelines as much as they were foci in the war to establish one
future.  That is, they were developed by one faction then co-opted by 
the various factions in their struggles.

What I found interesting about the first two books was not the SF 
portions of it nearly as much as the *human* portions.  The stories of
the pilgrims were all gripping, and that's what I liked about Hyperion
more than the future conflicts and all.  It was the people in the 
books, not the events surrounding them, that really spoke to me.  In 
fact, to some extent Simmons' insistent EYKIW's (everything you know 
is wrong) in Endymion irked me, and I felt cheapened the first two a 
little bit.  I still liked them, but for different reasons and 
certainly not as much as the Cantos.

Jim
Listening to the living Maru

___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Hyperion

2006-02-14 Thread Maru Dubshinki
On 2/14/06, Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hrm.  I think after reading the Endymion books I'd have to add a
 fourth line, wherein the Shrike is there to protect Aenea, possibly
 sent by those in the Void.  Though it could be an intercepted and
 altered Shrike from the UIs, or sent by the human UI to defend its
 third part.

The difficulty with this is, what was that fourth Shrike doing while
the other three were messing around with the pilgrims and various
political situations? I'd suggest that this was the Reaper faction AI-
since when you think about it, what Aenea did was to upset the status
quo, rip the TechnoCore out of their comfortable dead-end evolutionary
niche (forcing them out into unsearched evolutionary fitness
landscapes, laden with Lions and Tigers, and Bears oh my!); which is
exactly what Ray's reaper functions did on a smaller scale.

 The other three you listed make reasonable sense; however, I will
 admit that I never considered the various Shrikes to be separate
 timelines as much as they were foci in the war to establish one
 future.  That is, they were developed by one faction then co-opted by
 the various factions in their struggles.

That makes sense too- one Shrike and  one set of Time Tombs, not a
couple co-valent ones phasing in and out, if that makes sense-
intermittently controlled by different factions. I'm not completely
sure because I seem to remember some incidents which had to take place
simultaneously, but since I can't remember what those were, I'll drop
this.

 What I found interesting about the first two books was not the SF
 portions of it nearly as much as the *human* portions.  The stories of
 the pilgrims were all gripping, and that's what I liked about Hyperion
 more than the future conflicts and all.  It was the people in the
 books, not the events surrounding them, that really spoke to me.  In
 fact, to some extent Simmons' insistent EYKIW's (everything you know
 is wrong) in Endymion irked me, and I felt cheapened the first two a
 little bit.  I still liked them, but for different reasons and
 certainly not as much as the Cantos.

The focus in Endymion was on Raul and Aenea, who just couldn't carry
that sort of load- it took at least 6 interesting characters from all
sorts of genres and everything Simmons could warp and borrow from
Kelly's Out of Control to make the first two, and the second two just
didn't have that sort of firepower.
Endymion still made me fairly happy because it included a decent quota
of new and interesting and farout ideas, but there were far more in
the Hyperions.

 Jim
 Listening to the living Maru

~Maru
Listening to the music of the spheres
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Fwd: Perspectives: Political Humour from John Cleese

2006-02-14 Thread Nick Arnett
In light of your failure to elect a competent President of the USA and
thus to govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of
your independence, effective immediately. Her Sovereign Majesty Queen
Elizabeth II will resume monarchical duties over all states,
commonwealths, and territories (excepting Kansas, which she does not
fancy). Your new prime minister, Tony Blair, will appoint a governor
for America without the need for further  elections. Congress and the
Senate will be disbanded. A questionnaire may be circulated next year
to determine whether any of you noticed.


To aid in the transition to a British Crown dependency, the following
rules are introduced with immediate effect: You should look up
revocation in the Oxford English Dictionary. Then look up aluminium,
and check the pronunciation guide. You will be amazed at just how
wrongly you have been pronouncing it. The letter 'U' will be
reinstated in words such as 'favour' and 'neighbour.' Likewise, you
will learn to spell 'doughnut' without skipping half the letters, and
the suffix -ize will be replaced by the suffix -ise. Generally, you
will be expected to raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels. (look
up vocabulary). Using the same twenty-seven words interspersed with
filler noises such as like and you know is an unacceptable and
inefficient form of communication. There is no such thing as US
English. We will let Microsoft know on your behalf. The Microsoft
spell-checker will be adjusted to take account of the reinstated
letter 'u' and the elimination of -ize.


You will relearn your original national anthem, God Save The Queen.
July 4th will no longer be celebrated as a holiday.


You will learn to resolve personal issues without using guns, lawyers,
or therapists. The fact that you need so many lawyers and therapists
shows that you're not adult enough to be independent. Guns should only
be handled by adults. If you're not adult enough to sort things out
without suing someone or speaking to a therapist then you're not grown
up enough to handle a gun. Therefore, you will no longer be allowed to
own or carry anything more dangerous than a vegetable peeler. A permit
will be required if you wish to carry a vegetable peeler in public.


All American cars are hereby banned. They are crap and this is for
your own good. When we show you German cars, you will understand what
we mean.  All intersections will be replaced with roundabouts, and you
will start driving on the left with immediate effect. At the same
time, you will go metric with immediate effect and without the benefit
of conversion tables. Both roundabouts and metrication will help you
understand the British sense of humour.  The Former USA will adopt UK
prices on petrol (which you have been calling gasoline) -roughly $6/US
gallon. Get used to it.


You will learn to make real chips. Those things you call French fries
are not real chips, and those things you insist on calling potato
chips are properly called crisps. Real chips are thick cut, fried in
animal fat, and dressed not with catsup but with vinegar.  The cold
tasteless stuff you insist on calling beer is not actually beer at
all. Henceforth, only proper British Bitter will be referred to as
beer, and European brews of known and accepted provenance will be
referred to as Lager. American brands will be referred to as
Near-Frozen Gnat's Urine, so that all can be sold without risk of
further confusion.


Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast English actors as good
guys. Hollywood will also be required to cast English actors to play
English characters. Watching Andie MacDowell attempt English dialogue
in Four Weddings and a Funeral was an experience akin to having one's
ears removed with a cheese grater.


You will cease playing American football. There is only one kind of
proper football; you call it soccer. Those of you brave enough will,
in time, be  allowed to play rugby which has some similarities to
American football, but does not involve stopping for a rest every
twenty seconds or wearing full kevlar body armour like a bunch of
nancies.  Further, you will stop playing baseball. It is not
reasonable to host an event called the World Series for a game which
is not played outside of America. Since only 2.1% of you are aware
that there is a world beyond your borders, your error is
understandable.


You must tell us who killed JFK. It's been driving us mad.


An internal revenue agent (i.e. tax collector) from Her Majesty's
Government will be with you shortly to ensure the acquisition of all
monies due (backdated to 1776).


Thank you for your cooperation.





--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Perspectives: Political Humour from John Cleese

2006-02-14 Thread Maru Dubshinki
On 2/14/06, Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In light of your failure to elect a competent President of the USA and
 thus to govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of
 your independence, effective immediately. Her Sovereign Majesty Queen
 Elizabeth II will resume monarchical duties over all states,
 commonwealths, and territories (excepting Kansas, which she does not
 fancy). Your new prime minister, Tony Blair, will appoint a governor
 for America without the need for further  elections. Congress and the
 Senate will be disbanded. A questionnaire may be circulated next year
 to determine whether any of you noticed.


 To aid in the transition to a British Crown dependency, the following
 rules are introduced with immediate effect: You should look up
 revocation in the Oxford English Dictionary. Then look up aluminium,
 and check the pronunciation guide. You will be amazed at just how
 wrongly you have been pronouncing it. The letter 'U' will be
 reinstated in words such as 'favour' and 'neighbour.' Likewise, you
 will learn to spell 'doughnut' without skipping half the letters, and
 the suffix -ize will be replaced by the suffix -ise. Generally, you
 will be expected to raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels. (look
 up vocabulary). Using the same twenty-seven words interspersed with
 filler noises such as like and you know is an unacceptable and
 inefficient form of communication. There is no such thing as US
 English. We will let Microsoft know on your behalf. The Microsoft
 spell-checker will be adjusted to take account of the reinstated
 letter 'u' and the elimination of -ize.


 You will relearn your original national anthem, God Save The Queen.
 July 4th will no longer be celebrated as a holiday.


 You will learn to resolve personal issues without using guns, lawyers,
 or therapists. The fact that you need so many lawyers and therapists
 shows that you're not adult enough to be independent. Guns should only
 be handled by adults. If you're not adult enough to sort things out
 without suing someone or speaking to a therapist then you're not grown
 up enough to handle a gun. Therefore, you will no longer be allowed to
 own or carry anything more dangerous than a vegetable peeler. A permit
 will be required if you wish to carry a vegetable peeler in public.


 All American cars are hereby banned. They are crap and this is for
 your own good. When we show you German cars, you will understand what
 we mean.  All intersections will be replaced with roundabouts, and you
 will start driving on the left with immediate effect. At the same
 time, you will go metric with immediate effect and without the benefit
 of conversion tables. Both roundabouts and metrication will help you
 understand the British sense of humour.  The Former USA will adopt UK
 prices on petrol (which you have been calling gasoline) -roughly $6/US
 gallon. Get used to it.


 You will learn to make real chips. Those things you call French fries
 are not real chips, and those things you insist on calling potato
 chips are properly called crisps. Real chips are thick cut, fried in
 animal fat, and dressed not with catsup but with vinegar.  The cold
 tasteless stuff you insist on calling beer is not actually beer at
 all. Henceforth, only proper British Bitter will be referred to as
 beer, and European brews of known and accepted provenance will be
 referred to as Lager. American brands will be referred to as
 Near-Frozen Gnat's Urine, so that all can be sold without risk of
 further confusion.


 Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast English actors as good
 guys. Hollywood will also be required to cast English actors to play
 English characters. Watching Andie MacDowell attempt English dialogue
 in Four Weddings and a Funeral was an experience akin to having one's
 ears removed with a cheese grater.


 You will cease playing American football. There is only one kind of
 proper football; you call it soccer. Those of you brave enough will,
 in time, be  allowed to play rugby which has some similarities to
 American football, but does not involve stopping for a rest every
 twenty seconds or wearing full kevlar body armour like a bunch of
 nancies.  Further, you will stop playing baseball. It is not
 reasonable to host an event called the World Series for a game which
 is not played outside of America. Since only 2.1% of you are aware
 that there is a world beyond your borders, your error is
 understandable.


 You must tell us who killed JFK. It's been driving us mad.


 An internal revenue agent (i.e. tax collector) from Her Majesty's
 Government will be with you shortly to ensure the acquisition of all
 monies due (backdated to 1776).


 Thank you for your cooperation.





 --
 Nick Arnett

http://www.snopes.com/politics/satire/revocation.asp

~Maru
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Hyperion

2006-02-14 Thread Bemmzim
In a message dated 2/14/2006 12:06:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 What I found interesting about the first two books was not the SF 
 portions of it nearly as much as the *human* portions.  The stories of
 the pilgrims were all gripping, and that's what I liked about Hyperion
 more than the future conflicts and all.  It was the people in the 
 books, not the events surrounding them, that really spoke to me.  In 
 fact, to some extent Simmons' insistent EYKIW's (everything you know 
 is wrong) in Endymion irked me, and I felt cheapened the first two a 
 little bit.  I still liked them, but for different reasons and 
 certainly not as much as the Cantos.
 

I agree. I thought the first two books were about the people. The story of 
Rachel was unbelievably touching and sad. At the end of Fall  I thought that 
Simmons had wrapped everything up wonderfully. I felt that in the Endemyon  
books he had jumped the shark (or to be more accurate the Shrike). I enjoyed 
these books but they were totally different in tone and style.  Much more good 
but 
not unique sf. At first I was angry but then I realized that one has to be 
realistic. Simmons is a professional writer. He had created a universe and 
characters that were of value so why not use them?



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Perspectives: Political Humour from John Cleese

2006-02-14 Thread Nick Arnett
Aw heck.  That takes all the fun out of it.

Not really.

Actually, I thought about checking snopes.com, but figured that's like a
pilot going to the flight surgeon -- nothing positive can happen.

Nick

On 2/14/06, Maru Dubshinki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 http://www.snopes.com/politics/satire/revocation.asp

 ~Maru
 ___
 http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l




--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Perspectives: Political Humour from John Cleese

2006-02-14 Thread Julia Thompson

I was going to suggest you should have checked snopes.com.  :)

And that was going around a few years ago.  I got it from a friend 
before we moved into this house, and that move was more than 3.5 years 
ago.  :)


Julia


Nick Arnett wrote:

Aw heck.  That takes all the fun out of it.

Not really.

Actually, I thought about checking snopes.com, but figured that's like a
pilot going to the flight surgeon -- nothing positive can happen.

Nick

On 2/14/06, Maru Dubshinki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




http://www.snopes.com/politics/satire/revocation.asp

~Maru
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l






--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l




___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Perspectives: Political Humour from John Cleese

2006-02-14 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 07:16 PM Tuesday 2/14/2006, Nick Arnett wrote:

Aw heck.  That takes all the fun out of it.

Not really.

Actually, I thought about checking snopes.com, but figured that's like a
pilot going to the flight surgeon -- nothing positive can happen.



Which reminds me:  a bit late for Valentine's Day, but what the heck:


Sixteen reasons why Aeroplanes are easier to live with than women:


1) Aeroplanes usually kill you quickly, a woman takes her time.

2) Aeroplanes can be turned on by a flick of a switch.

3) Aeroplanes don't get mad if you do a touch and go

4) Aeroplanes don't object to a pre-flight inspection.

5) Aeroplanes come with manuals to explain their operation.

6) Aeroplanes have strict weight and balance limitations.

7) Aeroplanes can be flown any time of the month.

8) Aeroplanes don't come with in-laws.

9) Aeroplanes don't care about how many other Aeroplanes you've flown before.

10) Aeroplanes and pilots both arrive at the same time.

11) Aeroplanes don't mind if you look at other Aeroplanes.

12) Aeroplanes don't mind if you buy Aeroplane magazines.

13) Aeroplanes expect to be tied down.

14) Aeroplanes don't comment on your piloting skills.

15) Aeroplanes don't whine unless something is really wrong.

16) However, when Aeroplanes go quiet, just like women, it's usually not good.


(This one obviously came from another English guy, but I'm certain it 
wasn't John Cleese, unless he is sending me jokes under an alias.)



--Ronn!  :)

Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our country 
and two words have been added to the pledge of Allegiance... UNDER 
GOD.  Wouldn't it be a pity if someone said that is a prayer and that 
would be eliminated from schools too?

   -- Red Skelton

(Someone asked me to change my .sig quote back, so I did.)




___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l