Re: My .sig

2004-01-19 Thread Sonja van Baardwijk
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

snipped to avoid copyright problems


The contents of this message © 2004 by the author.  All rights 
reserved.  Any reproduction, redistribution, duplication, forwarding, 
dissemination, publication, broadcast, transmission or other use of 
the contents of this message, in whole or in part, with or without 
attribution, with or without this copyright statement, in any form by 
any means whatsoever is strictly and expressly prohibited.²
What I'm trying to say is that in actual effect I cannot quote any of 
your message to reply to since it has been copywrited. If I were 
employed in a sensitive area I would be that carefull. Maybe you'll 
agree that this is a bit over the top. So although it is understandable 
I gues that this is probably not what you intended. :O)

Sonja ;o)
GCU: You'll never be able to prevent some from inflicting malice on you 
when they really have set their hart on hurting you or your loved ones.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


My .sig

2004-01-18 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
FWIW, it occurs to me that some here may be wondering about my new .sig, 
and since the reason is related to a topic which has been brought up on 
this list, I thought I'd share it.

On another list that I'm on, there have been several incidents recently 
where someone (or perhaps more than one someone) using an assumed name has 
been deliberately copying portions of messages and forwarding them out of 
context in an attempt to get the original poster in trouble.  In one case, 
an offhand remark intended as humor¹ made about two years ago by one poster 
which was forwarded to his bosses by this snitch caused the person to be 
recently fired from the position he held for the past 35 years, with about 
two years to go before retirement.  The message below is an attempt -- in 
addition to the message from the list owner (an attorney) that all messages 
posted to the list are automatically copyrighted and are not to be 
forwarded without permission to remind whoever is doing this -- to remind 
whoever is doing this that what he is doing is illegal.

Unless anyone here is thinking of doing anything like that, don't worry 
about it.  I added it to my default .sig so it appears on all my messages, 
but will get it straightened out soon.  Everyone over there is still 
(understandably) upset over what has happened, so we are probably all 
overreacting just a bit right now.

_
¹Admittedly in poor taste, but far less offensive than many which appear 
regularly both on this list and the other list.

-- Ronn!  :)

The contents of this message © 2004 by the author.  All rights 
reserved.  Any reproduction, redistribution, duplication, forwarding, 
dissemination, publication, broadcast, transmission or other use of the 
contents of this message, in whole or in part, with or without attribution, 
with or without this copyright statement, in any form by any means 
whatsoever is strictly and expressly prohibited.²

²As one person on that list has pointed out, at least it doesn't continue 
... by Major League Baseball.



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: My .sig

2004-01-18 Thread Nick Arnett
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

Unless anyone here is thinking of doing anything like that, don't worry 
about it.  I added it to my default .sig so it appears on all my 
messages, but will get it straightened out soon.  Everyone over there is 
still (understandably) upset over what has happened, so we are probably 
all overreacting just a bit right now.
How about adding an exception for archiving mailing lists, to keep your 
list managers comfortable?

--
Nick Arnett
Phone/fax: (408) 904-7198
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: My .sig (vs fair use)

2004-01-18 Thread David Hobby
Nick Arnett wrote:
 
 Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
 
  Unless anyone here is thinking of doing anything like that, don't worry
  about it.  I added it to my default .sig so it appears on all my
  messages, but will get it straightened out soon.  Everyone over there is
  still (understandably) upset over what has happened, so we are probably
  all overreacting just a bit right now.
 
 How about adding an exception for archiving mailing lists, to keep your
 list managers comfortable?

Not that I'm a lawyer, but I don't buy that one CAN stop
their posts from being copied by copyrighting them.  The average
email is quite short--couldn't one copy the entire thing under
fair use?  (And if I just want to embarrass someone, I can make do
with just a fraction of their email.)
Now if you were to post an original novel in serialized 
form, it would probably violate copyright to take all your posts,
paste them together, and pass it on.

A reference:

http://www.bitlaw.com/copyright/fair_use.html

---David
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l