Re: FW: Possible virus detected - Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-19 Thread Bemmzim
In a message dated 1/18/2003 10:52:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Heck, I could put up with 10X the error messages if it 
 would mean Bob
 posting 10X as much.  :)You will turn my head young lady. 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-19 Thread Doug Pensinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


In a message dated 1/18/2003 11:52:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


'60s vintage TV drama.  Ben Casey was an MD.  Ever heard of 
Dr. Kildare?


Ben Casey was a neurosurgeon  
___


Oops, sorry Doc.  In my defense, I've never watched it more than a 
couple times and haven't seen it at all in...  never mind.  A long time.

Doug

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: FW: Possible virus detected - Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-19 Thread Julia Thompson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 In a message dated 1/18/2003 10:52:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
 
  Heck, I could put up with 10X the error messages if it
  would mean Bob
  posting 10X as much.

  :)You will turn my head young lady.

Oooh, when your head turns, can we watch it via MRI real-time?  :)

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-19 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/19/03 6:17:09 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 '60s vintage TV drama.  Ben Casey was an MD.  Ever heard of 
 Dr. Kildare?
 
 
 Ben Casey was a neurosurgeon  
 ___
 
 
 Oops, sorry Doc.  In my defense, I've never watched it more than a 
 couple times and haven't seen it at all in...  never mind.  A long time.
 
 Doug 

Is Doctor in the House available in US video format?  I don't give a durn 
about the dramas

The Roger Ramjet takeoffs on Dr. Kildare were pretty good though.

William Taylor
--
Man
Woman
Life
Death
Bunny Rabbit
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: FW: Possible virus detected - Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-18 Thread Nick Arnett

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of J. van Baardwijk

...

 A quick check reveals that the rejected message was sent by Bob
 Zimmerman.
 I suspect that there is some (hidden?) code in his message that
 the scanner
 on our mailserver interprets as a possible virus, probably put there by
 Bob's mailserver.

Can you identify which message?  I believe that the list server removes all
attachments, so it must be something in the message body.  I notice that his
messages include this header: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by
www.mccmedia.com id h0I2J1J07535, which is a bit unusual.

 BTW, just in case people see my mindef.nl address and the word virus in
 the error message and think I am trying to attack the list by
 attempting to
 send a virus, note that I was the intended *recipient* of the intercepted
 message, not the *sender*.

Makes sense, since you're listed in the To: header.  Could you (or anyone
else) translate the Dutch, if there's anything helpful there?

There does seem to be some sort of anti-virus triggered by Base64 encoding
in Mailman's archiving code, so it wouldn't be too surprising to see
mindef.nl's virus filter catching the same thing -- although why it does so
after the message has already passed through Mailman, I can't quite grasp.
Come to think of it, maybe that very header is suggesting to the virus
filter that there is a MIME-encoded attachment, even though it isn't really
there any more.

Hmmm...

Nick

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-18 Thread Robert Seeberger

- Original Message -
From: Ronn! Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: A new type of brain scanner


 At 09:25 PM 1/16/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 MR is the tool of choice for studying brain function. In our institution
 ADHD is a major area of research. The head of this program BJ Casey


 Okay, I'll ask:


 So, does the B stand for Ben?


The title sequence of Ben Casey is where I learned the symbols for Man,
Woman, and Infinity.

xponent
Geezer Maru
rob

You are a fluke of the universe.
You have no right to be here.
And whether you can hear it or not,
the universe is laughing behind your back.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: FW: Possible virus detected - Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-18 Thread J. van Baardwijk
At 08:10 18-01-2003 -0800, Nick Arnett wrote:


 A quick check reveals that the rejected message was sent by Bob
 Zimmerman. I suspect that there is some (hidden?) code in his message
 that the scanner on our mailserver interprets as a possible virus,
 probably put there by Bob's mailserver.

Can you identify which message?


Yes.



Could you (or anyone else) translate the Dutch, if there's anything
helpful there?


Yes.


Jeroen The Yes-man van Baardwijk


This message is copyright 2003 by J. van Baardwijk. No part of this message 
may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system (including but not limited 
to archives on the Internet), or transmitted, in any form or by any means, 
electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the 
written permission of the author. Reproduction of this message or parts 
thereof is permitted for the purpose of replying to this message, either to 
the author directly or through the Brin-L mailing list.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: FW: Possible virus detected - Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-18 Thread Robert Seeberger

- Original Message -
From: J. van Baardwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: FW: Possible virus detected - Re: A new type of brain scanner


 This message is copyright 2003 by J. van Baardwijk. No part of this
message
 may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system (including but not limited
 to archives on the Internet), or transmitted, in any form or by any means,
 electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the
 written permission of the author. Reproduction of this message or parts
 thereof is permitted for the purpose of replying to this message, either
to
 the author directly or through the Brin-L mailing list.


1 Since archiving is an integral part of the mailing list software, and
since the list has been archived for several years without complaints from
anyone regarding the archiving, to keep this disclaimer valid, you must quit
the list.

Archiving is far too firmly established as a list component for your
disclaimer to have *any* legal standing in *any* part of the world.

2 Since you have willingly and knowingly participated in an archived mailing
list for several years, no court in the world is going to support you.

3 There is no number 3


xponent
Reality Check Maru
rob

You are a fluke of the universe.
You have no right to be here.
And whether you can hear it or not,
the universe is laughing behind your back.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: FW: Possible virus detected - Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-18 Thread Bemmzim
In a message dated 1/18/2003 11:10:21 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

 
 
 
  ...
 
  A quick check reveals that the rejected message was sent by Bob
  Zimmerman.
  I suspect that there is some (hidden?) code in his message that
  the scanner
  on our mailserver interprets as a possible virus, probably put there by
  Bob's mailserver.
 
So what should I do to stop this? My computer is clean as far as I can tell (I ran my 
antivurs program two days ago). I have been emailing through aol web portal and the 
messages are getting through. Each message I send produces a response that says that 
the message had been successfuly accepted
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-18 Thread Bemmzim
In a message dated 1/18/2003 12:04:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 
 At 09:25 PM 1/16/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 MR is the tool of choice for studying brain function. In our institution 
 ADHD is a major area of research. The head of this program 
 BJ Casey
 
 
 Okay, I'll ask:
 
 
 So, does the B stand for Ben?
 
 That is funny but you are seriously dating yourself. I did that for years but I 
couldn't make commitment so I broke with myself and haven't spoken to myself for 
years. 

But in fact the truth is actually funnier; BJ stands for Betty Jo. She is from Rocky 
Point North Carolina. She has come a long way since then. She is married to another 
big time Cognitive Neuroscientist who was recently features on a PBS speial hosted by 
Robert Alda. Good old girl and brilliant ambtitous scientist rolled into one 
 
 
 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-17 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 16 Jan 2003 at 21:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In a message dated 1/15/2003 10:17:24 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  The intended applications of MEG - as far as I can see from reading
  two papers on it - are in studying brain conditions rather than
  individual patients. It's a powerful research tool which may for the
  first time, for example, map the exact areas of the brain affected
  by various forms of dyslexia and autism.
 

 that detect activity in specific brain areas. So in one session
 lasting less than an hour one can obtain unbelievable functionally
 correlated anatomic maps. MEG will never be able to duplicate the
 fusion of anatomy and function (one variant of MEG is Magnetic Source
 Imaging in which MEG information is superimposed on anatomic data
 obtained from MR.)

Yes, but the MR data isn't - I believe - real time as the MEG data 
is. Is that correct?
 
Andy
Dawn Falcon

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-17 Thread Bemmzim
In a message dated 1/16/2003 9:44:31 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Yes, but the MR data isn't - I believe - real time as the 
 MEG data 
 is. Is that correct?

Functional MR data is absolutely real time. When portions of the brain are active 
there is increased blood flow to that portion of the brain. For reasons that are not 
clear the blood flow actually excedes the metabolic needs of the brain and therefore 
there is a relative increase in oxygen in the activitated areas. This oxygen is 
carried in hemoglobin. Deoxygenated blood contains deoxyhemaglobin which has different 
magnetic properties than oxyhemaglobin. Thus the tissue in active brain has different 
magnetic properties than non-active areas (this is called the BOLD effect). The 
changes in oxygenation are transient and therefore these experiments capture brain 
activiy. Not only are these effects occuring in real time but basic processing can 
occur during the experiment allowing for changes in the experiment while it occuring. 
The anatomic data and diffusion tensor data is acquired over several minutes and the 
functional data is superimposed on this. Even the anatomic data may!
 be very quickly acquired. For instance my group has a paper coming out today in the 
American Journal of Neuroradiology on alterations in brain diffusion in boxers. This 
is the first objective data to be found that might to be used to determine which 
boxers are at risk for chronic traumatic brain injury(punk drunk syndrome or dementia 
pugilistica). The data acquisition for this is less than 4 minutes and the data 
analysis takes about one minute. 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



FW: Possible virus detected - Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-17 Thread Nick Arnett
Anybody here have any idea what this indicates?

--
Nick Arnett
Phone/fax: (408) 904-7198
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Possible virus detected - Re: A new type of brain scanner



Er is mogelijk een virus gevonden in uw bericht.

Uw bericht heeft de geadresseerde niet bereikt. Verwijder s.v.p.
geïnfecteerde bijlagen en probeer het opnieuw.

*

A virus is suspected in your message.

The message you send did not reach the destination address. Please
remove any infected attachments and try again.

Subject: Re: A new type of brain scanner
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 21:25:00 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: FW: Possible virus detected - Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-17 Thread David Hobby
Nick Arnett wrote:
 
 Anybody here have any idea what this indicates?
 

That the BrinList Soap Opera goes on?  : )


 Subject: Possible virus detected - Re: A new type of brain scanner
...
 
 A virus is suspected in your message.
 
 The message you send did not reach the destination address. Please
 remove any infected attachments and try again.
 
 Subject: Re: A new type of brain scanner
 Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 21:25:00 -0500
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

One could just email a part of a virus to get this
effect.  I take it that it never got far, so who knows...

---David
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-16 Thread Bemmzim
In a message dated 1/15/2003 10:17:24 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 The intended applications of MEG - as far as I can see from reading
 two papers on it - are in studying brain conditions rather than
 individual patients. It's a powerful research tool which may for the
 first time, for example, map the exact areas of the brain 
 affected by
 various forms of dyslexia and autism.

Well as to use in individual patients the proponents of MEG do hope that will have 
direct clinical appplications in disorders where anatomic imaging is insensitive such 
as post traumatic syndromes dementia and psychosis. The problem is that these are 
precisely the areas where PET and MRI in particular have already demonstrated exciting 
new results. With a technique called diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) it possible to 
produce detailed maps of all white matter tracks in the brain and this data can be 
combined with functional MR studies that detect activity in specific brain areas. So 
in one session lasting less than an hour one can obtain unbelievable functionally 
correlated anatomic maps. MEG will never be able to duplicate the fusion of anatomy 
and function (one variant of MEG is Magnetic Source Imaging in which MEG information 
is superimposed on anatomic data obtained from MR.)

MR is the tool of choice for studying brain function. In our institution ADHD is a 
major area of research. The head of this program BJ Casey uses MR exclusively. In 
reality, the economics of imaging also strongly favor MR.The machines are expensive 
1,000,00)and are not used continuously for research. A scanner that can do routine 
clinical cases can pay for itself and in essence fund research efforts
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-15 Thread Bemmzim
In a message dated 1/14/2003 11:06:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Scientists call it M.E.G. — short for Magnetoencephalography — a
 scanner capable, unlike any before it, of showing activity 
 in the
 brain as it happens.

Lets not get carried away; MEG (Magneto-Encepholograpy) is similar to EEG - 
electroencephalograpy but it measures magnetic rather than electrical activity. This 
makes it possible obtain more accurate spacial information than with EEG. It promises 
to provide more functional information. But both PET and MR can also provide this 
information. MEG shows promise but it is unclear what its role will be. Bill Orison, a 
neuroradiolgist who is I believe chairman of Radiology at U of New Mexico is one of 
the pioneers in this in this technology
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: A new type of brain scanner

2003-01-15 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 15 Jan 2003 at 22:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In a message dated 1/14/2003 11:06:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Scientists call it M.E.G. — short for Magnetoencephalography — a
  scanner capable, unlike any before it, of showing activity in the
  brain as it happens.
 
 Lets not get carried away; MEG (Magneto-Encepholograpy) is similar to
 EEG - electroencephalograpy but it measures magnetic rather than
 electrical activity. This makes it possible obtain more accurate
 spacial information than with EEG. It promises to provide more
 functional information. But both PET and MR can also provide this
 information. MEG shows promise but it is unclear what its role will
 be. Bill Orison, a neuroradiolgist who is I believe chairman of
 Radiology at U of New Mexico is one of the pioneers in this in this
 technology ___
 http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

As you say, EEG is less accurate spatially and apparently the hopes 
are for far higher real-time resoloutions with MEG.

The intended applications of MEG - as far as I can see from reading 
two papers on it - are in studying brain conditions rather than 
individual patients. It's a powerful research tool which may for the 
first time, for example, map the exact areas of the brain affected by 
various forms of dyslexia and autism.

Andy


Dawn Falcon

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l