RE: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?
Problem seen in 2.11.41 and 42, not in 2.11.34. I didn't install or download any intervening development releases. I'd be happy to try them, but how do I get the binaries for Windows? Trevor D > -Original Message- > From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 March 2008 01:36 > To: Valentin Villenave > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bug-Lilypond > Subject: Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font > caching problem? > > > this type of stuff is tricky. The last time we > saw this, it was > > - dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + "/fonts/otf/"); > - dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + "/fonts/type1/"); > + /* Extra trailing slash suddenly breaks > fontconfig (fc-cache 2.5.0) > + on windows. */ > + dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + "/fonts/otf"); > + dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + "/fonts/type1"); > > can someone please post the exact version number > where you've started > seeing this? > > 2008/3/11, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 2008/3/11, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > Yes, definitely a regression. I've gone > back to using > > > 2.11.34 which does not suffer this bug, as > most of my > > > documentation work is fiddling with tiny > snippets, and a 1 > > > minute delay every time I make a change > makes it impossible > > > to work. > > > > > > OK. That's it. I've opened a new issue: > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=588 > > > > Trevor: perhaps you should try the workaround > described on > > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=545#c1 > > > > Cheers, > > > > Valentin > > > > > > > > ___ > > bug-lilypond mailing list > > bug-lilypond@gnu.org > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond > > > > > -- > Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen > ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?
You're going to kick yourself over this: http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/ Cheers, - Graham On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:04:06 - "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Problem seen in 2.11.41 and 42, not in 2.11.34. I didn't install or > download any intervening development releases. I'd be happy to try > them, but how do I get the binaries for Windows? > > Trevor D > > > -Original Message- > > From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 13 March 2008 01:36 > > To: Valentin Villenave > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bug-Lilypond > > Subject: Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font > > caching problem? > > > > > > this type of stuff is tricky. The last time we > > saw this, it was > > > > - dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + "/fonts/otf/"); > > - dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + "/fonts/type1/"); > > + /* Extra trailing slash suddenly breaks > > fontconfig (fc-cache 2.5.0) > > + on windows. */ > > + dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + "/fonts/otf"); > > + dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + "/fonts/type1"); > > > > can someone please post the exact version number > > where you've started > > seeing this? > > > > 2008/3/11, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > 2008/3/11, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, definitely a regression. I've gone > > back to using > > > > 2.11.34 which does not suffer this bug, as > > most of my > > > > documentation work is fiddling with tiny > > snippets, and a 1 > > > > minute delay every time I make a change > > makes it impossible > > > > to work. > > > > > > > > > OK. That's it. I've opened a new issue: > > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=588 > > > > > > Trevor: perhaps you should try the workaround > > described on > > > > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=545#c1 > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Valentin > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > bug-lilypond mailing list > > > bug-lilypond@gnu.org > > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond > > > > > > > > > -- > > Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > > http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen > > > > > > ___ > bug-lilypond mailing list > bug-lilypond@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
RE: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?
Thanks Graham :( OK - here are the results: 2.11.34-1 Compiles in 15 secs Uses .fontconfig directory 2.11.35-1 Fails with libguile2-17.dll not found Copied this in, then Fails with error about ice-9/boot-9.scm not in load path 2.11.35-2 Compiles in 15 secs, but Lots of error messages like Pango CRITICAL FT_Get_Glyph_Name() error invalid argument Glyph has no name Skipping Glyph U+ ... Century-Schl-Roma.otf Uses .fontconfig directory 2.11.36-1, 37-1, 41-1, 42-1 All compile slowly - 65 secs All use .lilypond-fonts directory Trevor D > -Original Message- > From: Graham Percival [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 March 2008 08:26 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Valentin Villenave; Bug-Lilypond > Subject: Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font > caching problem? > > > You're going to kick yourself over this: > http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/ > > Cheers, > - Graham > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:04:06 - > "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Problem seen in 2.11.41 and 42, not in 2.11.34. > I didn't install or > > download any intervening development releases. > I'd be happy to try > > them, but how do I get the binaries for Windows? > > > > Trevor D > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 13 March 2008 01:36 > > > To: Valentin Villenave > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bug-Lilypond > > > Subject: Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font > > > caching problem? > > > > > > > > > this type of stuff is tricky. The last time we > > > saw this, it was > > > > > > - dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + "/fonts/otf/"); > > > - dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + > "/fonts/type1/"); > > > + /* Extra trailing slash suddenly breaks > > > fontconfig (fc-cache 2.5.0) > > > + on windows. */ > > > + dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + "/fonts/otf"); > > > + dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + "/fonts/type1"); > > > > > > can someone please post the exact version number > > > where you've started > > > seeing this? > > > > > > 2008/3/11, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > 2008/3/11, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, definitely a regression. I've gone > > > back to using > > > > > 2.11.34 which does not suffer this bug, as > > > most of my > > > > > documentation work is fiddling with tiny > > > snippets, and a 1 > > > > > minute delay every time I make a change > > > makes it impossible > > > > > to work. > > > > > > > > > > > > OK. That's it. I've opened a new issue: > > > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=588 > > > > > > Trevor: perhaps you should try the workaround > > described on > > > > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=545#c1 > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Valentin > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > bug-lilypond mailing list > > > bug-lilypond@gnu.org > > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond > > > > > > > > > -- > > Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > > http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen > > > > > > ___ > bug-lilypond mailing list > bug-lilypond@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: regarding bug 339
2008/3/12, Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I wrote out an organ accompaniment in LilyPond (to get it onto 4 pages > instead of 13), and it illustrates this situation very well. In eight > separate places there was a major or minor second between a dotted and > undotted note, with the dotted note on a staff space - exactly the > condition that produces the bug shown in the report > (http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=339). Han-Wen: Thanks for having added this to the tracker (I was about to deal with Andrew's last three reports but I wanted to udnerstand them first :) Andrew: Looks like #339 has just been fixed; that should be OK with the next development version. Cheers, Valentin ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Issue 589 in lilypond: Odd spacing with polyphonic dotted notes
Issue 589: Odd spacing with polyphonic dotted notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=589
New issue report by v.villenave:
% When the same note appears simultaneously in two voices and the
% noteheads are different, they should appear right beside each other.
% This work properly in LilyPond except when the lower voice has a
% dotted note, in which case there is a gap between the noteheads. (I
% checked with dotted quarters and got the same result.)
\version "2.11.42"
<<
{g'4 s2. g'4 s2.} \\
{g'2 s2 g'2. s4}
% This has not been tested with latest git. If it appears to be
% fixed, I'll just close the issue -vv
Attachments:
dottedspacing.png 1.4 KB
Issue attributes:
Status: Accepted
Owner: v.villenave
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: extra space can appear before dotted notes in voice two
2008/3/12, Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This work properly in LilyPond except when the lower voice has a > dotted note, in which case there is a gap between the noteheads. (I > checked with dotted quarters and got the same result.) Nice one! Han-Wen has been working on dotted notes recently, and perhaps this has fixed your problem. However, I've added it anyway: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=589 Cheers, Valentin ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Issue 590 in lilypond: Ties can collide with augmentation dots
Issue 590: Ties can collide with augmentation dots
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=590
New issue report by v.villenave:
% Given the right note spacing and tie directions,
% ties can collide with rhythmic augmentation dots.
% In this example, if the line width is
% reduced to 52 LilyPond avoids the collision.
\version "2.11.41"
\paper {
ragged-right = ##f
line-width = 53
}
\relative c'' {
\tieDown
4.~
8
}
Issue attributes:
Status: Accepted
Owner: v.villenave
Labels: Type-Collision Priority-Low Engraving-nitpick
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: ties can collide with dots
2008/3/12, Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Given the right note spacing and tie directions, ties can collide with > rhythmic augmentation dots. In this example, if the line width is > reduced to 52 LilyPond avoids the collision. Increasing the line width > reduces the severity of the collision by reducing the initial slope of > the tie. (Bug found when writing out organ parts with two voices per > staff, I don't just sit at home trying these things randomly!) > Andrew Yes: the more you work with Lily, the more you're likely to stumble upon some bugs :) I can't say i'm really convinced by your example; however I couldn't come up with a better one myself, so I'll just add it. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=590 Cheers, Valentin ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 541 in lilypond: Hebrew lyrics diacritic not well aligned
Issue 541: Hebrew lyrics diacritic not well aligned
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=541
Han-Wen, Thank you for your attention to this issue.
Actually I do not know how exactly to set font in lily.
Looking at the generated PostScript file text-code,
I see (assuming I understand correctly) that I passively use:
%%BeginFont: DejaVuSans
%!PS-TrueTypeFont
11 dict begin
/FontName /DejaVuSans def
The manual shows example of,
...
\markup {
\override #'(font-name . "Vera Bold")
...
and
...
(make-pango-font-tree "Times New Roman"
"Nimbus Sans"
"Luxi Mono"
...
But I don't know how to use these commands to
efffectively set AharoniCLM-Book or CenturySchL-Rom .
Could you please send explicit .ly files that do it
for the small markup example you have suggested.
Then I will continue and generate the simple case so we can compare.
regards -- yotam
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:10:13 -0700
> ...
> Comment #4 by hanwenn:
> regarding the mail you sent,
>
> when I swap the sign of the X off,
> I see some differences, but not the ones your
> image shows (see image). This is with
>
> %%BeginFont: AharoniCLM-Book
> %%BeginFont: CenturySchL-Roma
>
> Can you verify that lily does the wrong thing when you use these fonts?
>
> Which font are you using?
>
> Can you prepare a simpler file, with just the chars that should change? eg.
>
> \markup {
> \column {
> כַ
> בוּ
> הַ
> אוֹֹ
> רות
> וַ
> }
> }
> ...
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Unwanted tie direction
This seems very similar to issues 440 and 434, but here there is no
forced line break. I can't really tell if it is the same exact issue
or not.
-Jay
\version "2.11.42"
\paper
{
ragged-right = ##t
}
\score
{
\new Staff \relative c''
{
b1~ | b~ | b2 r |
}
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
