Re: Issue 1770 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic causes error with \oneVoice

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #1 on issue 1770 by reinhold...@gmail.com: \displayLilyMusic causes  
error with \oneVoice

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1770

The problem seems to lie in the handling of RevertProperty.

However, I must say that the output for 2.14 is totally unhelpful for  
debugging the problem. It does not tell you where the problem occurred and  
which function call caused it. Is there any way to revert the error output  
to the output of 2.12, which is really great for debugging?



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1725 in lilypond: DynamicTextSpanner collides with DynamicText

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #2 on issue 1725 by x.sche...@gmail.com: DynamicTextSpanner  
collides with DynamicText

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1725

Thanks for the workaround Keith.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 1724 - 620 : workaround?

2011-07-20 Thread Xavier Scheuer
[Sorry for late follow-up, I was on holiday. :-) ]

Hi Neil,

I see you merged issue 1724 : DynamicTextSpanner inside Dynamics
context are shifted due to pedal  into  issue 620 : It should be
possible to specify more specific spanner bounds..

I was wondering if you (or someone else) would have maybe a workaround
I could use in order to have a fairly good output for the code attached
to #1724 ?
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1724

Issue 1724 is really annoying for me since it totally demolish the
advantages of using the Dynamics context.  Yes, we have the dynamics
correctly aligned vertically (i.e. centered between the two staves of
PianoStaff) but due to issue 1724 (620) the DynamicText and
DynamicTextSpanner are shifted left irregularly, which results in
really bad horizontal alignment (- poor output !).

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!

Cheers,
Xavier

PS : Please note that since issue 620 has no lilypond code showing the
consequences of this issue, it is difficult for a lambda user to
understand it, hence IMHO the several duplicate report of this issue.

-- 
Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 896 in lilypond: When used after \tag, \partcombine may fail to print notes

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #2 on issue 896 by reinhold...@gmail.com: When used after \tag,  
\partcombine may fail to print notes

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=896

partcombine does its job (deciding how to distribute the note events to the  
up/down/combined voices) long before the keepWithTag is run. So, to  
partcombine the music looks like:

e4 e4 f g a b r c r

Unfortunately, later on the second e4 is removed, so the decisions of the  
part-combiner are off by a quarter.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 34 in lilypond: Grace synchronization

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #14 on issue 34 by reinhold...@gmail.com: Grace synchronization
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=34

I did a little digging and the issue is that all \set commands (like the  
clef) and all other events (like KeyEvent) are treated as if they occurred  
together with the first note (and that problem lies deeper than the  
Sequential_iterator's handling of grace notes!). I.e. if you have:

Voice 1: \clef bass \grace c8 d4
Voice 2: \clef bass d4

Then in Voice 1, the clef properties (clefGlyph and the like) will be set  
at moment 0G-1/8, while in Voice 2, they will be set only at moment 0G.

Similarly, all key events will be assigned the moment of the first note...
Now, the iterators and then the engravers go through the music one moment  
at a time, so the order of things is:

-) moment 0G-1/8 : only voice 1 creates a clef and the grace note
-) moment 0 : voice 1 creates the d4, while voice 2 changes the clef and  
creates a d4.


However, in my eyes we need to distinguish the events at each moment.  
Basically, we have three different types of events:


1) events that should be processed at the very beginning of each moment  
(before grace notes are handled)
2) grace notes (i.e. notes that appear before the real content of the  
moment), possibly also including some \set command, which should not mess  
up things

3) normal notes

In other words, we need to find a way to process key/clef/barlines (in  
particular all SetEvents) etc. before all grace notes. One approach might  
be to assign a moment like 0G-inf to them, so they will be processed before  
all grace notes.


Or does anyone have a better idea where to start?

Cheers,
Reinhold


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1770 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic causes error with \oneVoice

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: reinhold...@gmail.com

Comment #2 on issue 1770 by reinhold...@gmail.com: \displayLilyMusic causes  
error with \oneVoice

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1770

(No comment was entered for this change.)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1744 in lilypond: \once \set behavior should be documented

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #1 on issue 1744 by reinhold...@gmail.com: \once \set behavior  
should be documented

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1744

Issue 153 is a valid request, and I think that \once\set should work just  
like described there (i.e. revert to the value before the \once\set).  
Adding documentation about this limitation is just a workaround for now,  
until we fix issue 153



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 155 in lilypond: \parenthesize does not take accidentals into account

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #7 on issue 155 by reinhold...@gmail.com: \parenthesize does not  
take accidentals into account

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=155

Issue 868 has been merged into this issue.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1770 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic causes error with \oneVoice

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: Patch-new

Comment #3 on issue 1770 by reinhold...@gmail.com: \displayLilyMusic causes  
error with \oneVoice

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1770

Patch up for review:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4805043


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1732 in lilypond: occasional segfault when compiling input/regression/midi/key-initial.ly

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #6 on issue 1732 by reinhold...@gmail.com: occasional segfault when  
compiling input/regression/midi/key-initial.ly

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1732

The error message throw from within critical section. indicates that this  
is a problem somewhere in threaded GUILE (they are using critical sections  
instead of finer-grained mutexes).


In particular, a (throw ...) function was called in guile, while guile was  
in a critical section (i.e. one where no error should occur). In that case,  
guile's libguile/throw.c simply exists. Unfortunately, it does not print  
out the exception that was thrown, so it's really hard to track down where  
the problem lies...



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1752 in lilypond: redesigning G clef in our Feta font

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #20 on issue 1752 by x.sche...@gmail.com: redesigning G clef in our  
Feta font

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1752

For what it counts, I still do not see the need to change the current
treble clef.  But IMHO your last proposal is far more acceptable than
your first design.  As I said, I'm not a font specialist and I won't
vote against your work.  Count me as neutral.

If the majority prefers the new suggestion, then let's switch to it.
It won't be possible to please everybody.

Again, thanks for your work Janek.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 868 in lilypond: \parenthesize does not take dotted notes into account

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 155

Comment #2 on issue 868 by reinhold...@gmail.com: \parenthesize does not  
take dotted notes into account

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=868

(No comment was entered for this change.)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1724 - 620 : workaround?

2011-07-20 Thread Neil Puttock
On 20 July 2011 13:27, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote:

 I was wondering if you (or someone else) would have maybe a workaround
 I could use in order to have a fairly good output for the code attached
 to #1724 ?
 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1724

Let me think about it for a bit.  I have an idea using a scheme
engraver which might work.

 PS : Please note that since issue 620 has no lilypond code showing the
 consequences of this issue, it is difficult for a lambda user to
 understand it, hence IMHO the several duplicate report of this issue.

You're welcome to add snippets to it rather than relying on the links
to the merged issues (we could also mention the Dynamics context in
the issue title).

Cheers,
Neil

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1695 in lilypond: Clef change placed outside score

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-review -CD-110718 fixed_2_15_6 backport

Comment #8 on issue 1695 by n.putt...@gmail.com: Clef change placed outside  
score

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1695

bebd93c2dd0d7363f311d912ec1ed1f7dfcb36ba


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1735 in lilypond: modifying default behaviour of tremolo slashes

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #5 on issue 1735 by x.sche...@gmail.com: modifying default  
behaviour of tremolo slashes

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1735

Please keep current settings (i.e. rectangular, parallel-to-the-beam
tremolos) as default behaviour.

Joe said he took this as default because that's what most of his scores
have and according to my personal experience, the current lily settings
looks far more familiar to scores I have played than the new proposed
default.
The last score I played is Beethoven's Piano Concerto No.5 and as you
can see on IMSLP in the Violin I part (first page)
http://imslp.org/wiki/Piano_Concerto_No.5,_Op.73_%28Beethoven,_Ludwig_van%29
http://imslp.info/files/imglnks/usimg/f/f2/IMSLP19342-PMLP03875-Beethoven_Piano_Concerto_5_V1.pdf

this edition by Breitkopf  Härtel uses rectangular, parallel-to-the-beam
tremolos (just as current lily settings).

IMHO we should not blindly follow Elaine Gould.
Eventually it would be great if someone took the time to study what are
the practices of renowned publisher's editions.
Or maybe try a little survey on lilypond-user.

Maybe the new proposed constant, non-rectangular could be the default
for RhythmicStaff (but we should ask some percussionists about it)

Thanks in advance and thanks for your work Janek, it is nice to have
such a feature.

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1770 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic causes error with \oneVoice

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #4 on issue 1770 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: \displayLilyMusic causes  
error with \oneVoice

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1770

This shouldn't be Critical -- it's not a segfault.




___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1695 in lilypond: Clef change placed outside score

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -backport fixed_2_14_2

Comment #9 on issue 1695 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Clef change placed  
outside score

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1695

Backported


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 1771 in lilypond: Nested reverts fail for properties which aren't set as defaults in define-grobs.scm

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Status: Accepted
Owner: 
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical Regression

New issue 1771 by n.putt...@gmail.com: Nested reverts fail for properties  
which aren't set as defaults in define-grobs.scm

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771

From the regtest property-nested-revert.ly:

\version 2.15.6

\relative c' {
  f2 \glissando c
  \override Glissando #'bound-details #'right #'Y = #4
  f2 \glissando c |
  \override Glissando #'bound-details #'left #'Y = #-6
  f2 \glissando c
  \revert Glissando #'(bound-details right Y)
  f2 \glissando c
  \revert Glissando #'(bound-details left Y)
  f2 \glissando c
}

Neither \revert restores the default behaviour unless the initial overrides  
are defined in Glissando's bound-details defaults inside define-grobs.scm.


This is directly caused by the fix for issue 1063,  
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=4ea5963dd6b5289e57454bd2702b9527c06d6001,  
but slipped through since the regression test is flawed in using  
glissandos; they have no extent, so don't show up in regtest comparisons.


Attachments:
lily-ec5de296.png  3.5 KB


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1433 in lilypond: \breakDynamicSpan breaks with \break (bounds of spanner are invalid)

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-new

Comment #4 on issue 1433 by reinhold...@gmail.com: \breakDynamicSpan breaks  
with \break (bounds of spanner are invalid)

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1433

Revised patch is up at http://codereview.appspot.com/4630070/
This new version now correctly handles the ordering of \breakDynamicSpan  
and \



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1433 in lilypond: \breakDynamicSpan breaks with \break (bounds of spanner are invalid)

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review

Comment #5 on issue 1433 by pkx1...@gmail.com: \breakDynamicSpan breaks  
with \break (bounds of spanner are invalid)

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1433

Make is fine, the same reg test that showed a difference last time now  
shows that the text 'dim...' has been replaced by hairpins, is this what is  
wanted?


See attached.

Attachments:
Issue_4630070.png  49.5 KB


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1768 in lilypond: Tremoli can collide with flags in tight spacing situations.

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-needs_work

Comment #5 on issue 1768 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Tremoli can collide with  
flags in tight spacing situations.

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1768

(No comment was entered for this change.)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1259 in lilypond: DynamicTextSpanner #'style = #'none doesn't work over \break

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review

Comment #5 on issue 1259 by pkx1...@gmail.com: DynamicTextSpanner #'style =  
#'none doesn't work over \break

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1259

Sorry I'm getting confused now. The last comment refers to a Rietveld  
twhich itself refers to Tracker issue 1433.


If this one Rietveld is for both Trackers then ok.

but see my comment

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1433#c5




___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1744 in lilypond: \once \set behavior should be documented

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #4 on issue 1744 by reinhold...@gmail.com: \once \set behavior  
should be documented

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1744

Just wait until my patch for issue 153 is pushed, then \once\set behaves  
just as expected and we don't need to document anything.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1259 in lilypond: DynamicTextSpanner #'style = #'none doesn't work over \break

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #6 on issue 1259 by reinhold...@gmail.com: DynamicTextSpanner  
#'style = #'none doesn't work over \break

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1259

That patch on Rietveld is for both issue 1433 and issue 1259. Both are  
caused by the same problem.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 34 in lilypond: Grace synchronization

2011-07-20 Thread Keith OHara
 lilypond at googlecode.com writes:

 Comment #14 on issue 34 by reinhold...@gmail.com: Grace synchronization
 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=34

 
 However, in my eyes we need to distinguish the events at each moment.  
 Basically, we have three different types of events:
 
 1) events that should be processed at the very beginning of each moment  
 (before grace notes are handled)
 2) grace notes (i.e. notes that appear before the real content of the  
 moment), possibly also including some \set command, which should not mess  
 up things
 3) normal notes
 
 In other words, we need to find a way to process key/clef/barlines (in  
 particular all SetEvents) etc. before all grace notes. One approach might  
 be to assign a moment like 0G-inf to them, so they will be processed before  
 all grace notes.

I think that is a promising approach.  I looked through the code thinking about 
this issue two days ago, and began to look for a way to default-initialize the 
grace_part_ of a Moment to something that would sort before any defined value 
of grace_part_.  I do not know enough Scheme to know if Rational grace_part_ = 
-1 / 0 is guaranteed to work as -inf.

It looks like most events should have effectively -inf for the grace_part_ of 
their timing.  

The new method would need to take over the job that create_grace_fixup_list() 
tries to do.  I am still figuring out how the list is created.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1752 in lilypond: redesigning G clef in our Feta font

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-needs_work

Comment #21 on issue 1752 by n.putt...@gmail.com: redesigning G clef in our  
Feta font

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1752

Patch set 3 needs more work: clef selection is broken for all clefs apart  
from treble if 'old style is set.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1390 in lilypond: Tied acciaccaturas should not be printed with a slur

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-review fixed_2_15_6

Comment #5 on issue 1390 by reinhold...@gmail.com: Tied acciaccaturas  
should not be printed with a slur

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1390

Pushed to git.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1507 in lilypond: weird linebreaks in song output

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review -CD-110718 Patch-needs_work

Comment #7 on issue 1507 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: weird linebreaks in song  
output

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1507

(No comment was entered for this change.)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1735 in lilypond: modifying default behaviour of tremolo slashes

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: CD-110722

Comment #6 on issue 1735 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: modifying default  
behaviour of tremolo slashes

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1735

(No comment was entered for this change.)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1727 in lilypond: Adds glissando stems to lilypond

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-needs_work

Comment #1 on issue 1727 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Adds glissando stems to  
lilypond

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1727

(No comment was entered for this change.)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1770 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic causes error with \oneVoice

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: CD-110722

Comment #7 on issue 1770 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: \displayLilyMusic causes  
error with \oneVoice

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1770

(No comment was entered for this change.)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1767 in lilypond: Feta font - change breve vertical lines

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-needs_work

Comment #11 on issue 1767 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Feta font - change  
breve vertical lines

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1767

(No comment was entered for this change.)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 153 in lilypond: \once \set fails to restore previous setting

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: reinhold...@gmail.com
Labels: Patch-new

Comment #12 on issue 153 by reinhold...@gmail.com: \once \set fails to  
restore previous setting

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=153

Patch is up for review at:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4810042

(This also fixes #1744)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1259 in lilypond: DynamicTextSpanner #'style = #'none doesn't work over \break

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-new

Comment #4 on issue 1259 by reinhold...@gmail.com: DynamicTextSpanner  
#'style = #'none doesn't work over \break

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1259

Revised patch is up at http://codereview.appspot.com/4630070/
This new version now correctly handles the ordering of \breakDynamicSpan  
and \



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1688 in lilypond: New half-closed hihat symbol for drum mode

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-needs_work

Comment #11 on issue 1688 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: New half-closed hihat  
symbol for drum mode

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1688

Neil has raised a couple of concerns.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1491 in lilypond: git-cl hangs when uploading patches due to bad mime-type

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #3 on issue 1491 by percival.music.ca: git-cl hangs when uploading  
patches due to bad mime-type

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1491

judging from
  http://codereview.appspot.com/4819041/
this is an issue for .ps files as well.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1705 in lilypond: New breve rest with ledger lines

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-review fixed_2_15_6

Comment #5 on issue 1705 by n.putt...@gmail.com: New breve rest with ledger  
lines

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1705

(No comment was entered for this change.)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1744 in lilypond: \once \set behavior should be documented

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #3 on issue 1744 by pkx1...@gmail.com: \once \set behavior should  
be documented

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1744

Is this a bug? If so we don't document bugs as a rule. If it is just a  
limitation of the feature then can someone give me some guidance on what  
they want and where and I'll get a patch up.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1770 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic causes error with \oneVoice

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Critical Priority-High

Comment #6 on issue 1770 by n.putt...@gmail.com: \displayLilyMusic causes  
error with \oneVoice

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1770

(No comment was entered for this change.)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1695 in lilypond: Clef change placed outside score

2011-07-20 Thread lilypond


Comment #10 on issue 1695 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Clef change placed  
outside score

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1695

Backported


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond