Re: version 2.14.2, notation reference manual, section 5.1.7 hasincorrect diagrams
From: "ehzone" Sunday, July 31, 2011 6:48 AM The section has 2 examples meant to show how to place lyrics between the staves of a piano staff. The image accompanying the first example isn't correct; the lyrics should appear under the bass clef and not between the treble and bass. Actually this example should be removed and the text adjusted. Here's why: The contexts acceptable to GrandStaff (and also its alias PianoStaff) were changed in commit cf3bd5e6b7e99d68eef700b308bff798970e2bb9 on 23 Mar 2011 to accept Lyrics by default, which is why the Lyrics now appear between the staves in the example showing the default action, but changing the documentation to correspond was overlooked. my $0.02 worth. I hope this helps. It does, thanks! Trevor - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3798 - Release Date: 07/30/11 ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1 in lilypond: this is a test
Comment #11 on issue 1 by lemniska...@gmail.com: this is a test http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1 Sorry, i need to test sending comments using e-mail replies... ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1 in lilypond: this is a test
Comment #12 on issue 1 by janek.li...@gmail.com: this is a test http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1 More test, sorry. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1 in lilypond: this is a test
Comment #13 on issue 1 by lemniska...@gmail.com: this is a test http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1 Final test: see if this appears on the tracker's webpage. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1063 in lilypond: Reverting nested property fails to restore default value if preceded by override in same grob
Updates: Status: Started Labels: -Patch -fixed_2_13_30 Patch-needs_work Comment #6 on issue 1063 by d...@gnu.org: Reverting nested property fails to restore default value if preceded by override in same grob http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1063 I am shortly reverting this patch because it causes the critical regression #1771. This issue should have its status changed long ago in order to alert the ones subscribed to this issue and not following the list to the problem. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1771 in lilypond: Nested reverts fail for properties which aren't set as defaults in define-grobs.scm
Comment #1 on issue 1771 by d...@gnu.org: Nested reverts fail for properties which aren't set as defaults in define-grobs.scm http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771 Bad fix reverted in 47473646b1e98cf9cf10689c640a37f3ac6640c6 Issue 1063 has been reopenend. I am not sure how this issue and issue 1063 should in consequence be labelled or treated. Can somebody else cater to updating the respective status and/or appropriately link those issues? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: odd macport config
"Floris van Manen" wrote in message news:6e8246bd-01d3-4acc-83e3-10a8134d8...@klankschap.nl... I've got OSX Lion running I've used MacPort to install python27 When i want to install Lilypond with MacPort, it asks for an odd combination: python26 and py27-libxml2 Is there a particular reason for lilypond to insist on using python26 instead of the already installed python27 ? Thanks! Floris $ sudo port install lilypond Password: Portfile changed since last build; discarding previous state. ---> Computing dependencies for lilypond ---> Dependencies to be installed: mftrace python26 texlive texlive-basic texlive-bin gd2 xpm libzzip xmlto coreutils docbook-xml docbook-xml-4.1.2 xmlcatmgr docbook-xml-4.2 docbook-xml-4.3 docbook-xml-4.4 docbook-xml-4.5 docbook-xml-5.0 docbook-xml docbook-xsl docbook-xsl findutils fop getopt libxslt libxslt openmotif xbitmaps xorg-libXmu xorg-libXp xorg-printproto poppler gtk2 atk gtk-doc gnome-doc-utils intltool gnome-common p5-getopt-long p5-pathtools p5-scalar-list-utils p5-xml-parser iso-codes py27-libxml2 rarian gdk-pixbuf2 jasper pango cairo libpixman xorg-xcb-util shared-mime-info xorg-libXcomposite xorg-compositeproto xorg-libXfixes xorg-fixesproto xorg-libXcursor xorg-libXdamage xorg-damageproto xorg-libXinerama xorg-xineramaproto openjpeg jbigkit lcms2 poppler-data t1lib texli ve-common texlive-common texlive-documentation-base texlive-bin-extra detex latexdiff latexmk texlive-latex texlive-latex pdfjam texlive-latex-recommended pgf texlive-latex-recommended texlive-context texlive-metapost texlive-metapost texlive-xetex texlive-generic-recommended texlive-latex3 texlive-documentation-english texlive-fonts-recommended texlive-fontutils texlive-lang-czechslovak texlive-lang-dutch texlive-lang-english texlive-lang-french texlive-lang-german texlive-lang-italian texlive-lang-polish texlive-lang-portuguese texlive-lang-spanish texlive-luatex texlive-math-extra t1utils texi2html urw-fonts I'd suggest asking the question on devel - developers are the only people likely to know this, and don't always read this mailing list. -- Phil Holmes Bug Squad ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: version 2.14.2, notation reference manual, section 5.1.7 hasincorrect diagrams
"Trevor Daniels" wrote in message news:62EC5FA4701E4CA3BB7653F5392A1AD4@TrevorLaptop... From: "ehzone" Sunday, July 31, 2011 6:48 AM The section has 2 examples meant to show how to place lyrics between the staves of a piano staff. The image accompanying the first example isn't correct; the lyrics should appear under the bass clef and not between the treble and bass. Actually this example should be removed and the text adjusted. Here's why: The contexts acceptable to GrandStaff (and also its alias PianoStaff) were changed in commit cf3bd5e6b7e99d68eef700b308bff798970e2bb9 on 23 Mar 2011 to accept Lyrics by default, which is why the Lyrics now appear between the staves in the example showing the default action, but changing the documentation to correspond was overlooked. my $0.02 worth. I hope this helps. It does, thanks! Trevor http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1793 -- Phil Holmes Bug Squad ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Issue 1793 in lilypond: Doc: change how lyrics in PianoStaff is documented
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Documentation Priority-High New issue 1793 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Doc: change how lyrics in PianoStaff is documented http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1793 http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/aligning-contexts states that te lyrics should be placed differently in the 2 examples. They're not. Trevor explained this as: "The contexts acceptable to GrandStaff (and also its alias PianoStaff) were changed in commit cf3bd5e6b7e99d68eef700b308bff798970e2bb9 on 23 Mar 2011 to accept Lyrics by default, which is why the Lyrics now appear between the staves in the example showing the default action, but changing the documentation to correspond was overlooked." ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Lilypond will not launch under OSX 10.7 Lion
"Floris van Manen" wrote in message news:1b822dd7-9e12-4f7c-bf77-76157ec39...@klankschap.nl... When trying to launch Lilypond under OSX 10.7 Lion it stops. [snip] For the record: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1781 -- Phil Holmes Bug Squad ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Completion_rest_engraver fails with fractional rests
wrote in message
news:c0269a54-0fc3-4fb3-a022-aba18b67e...@apollinemike.com...
\new Voice
\with { \remove "Rest_engraver" \consists "Completion_rest_engraver" }
{ r1*6/4 r2 }
This gets me the attached output.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1772
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: lyrics with musical intro?
"Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote in message news:87vcuyw0hs@gnu.org... Ben Engbers asked me for an example on how to set lyrics with a musical intro. Do we have something like this in the documentation? I only found a reply on lilypond-user by Mats that I reworked into two smaller snippets (see below). It may be worth having? Greetings, Jan Jan, I'm replying on the bugs mail list, although this doesn't seem a particularly appropriate list. I don't fully understand what's wanted. Is it, for example, a single stave of music that starts without lyrics and then does have lyrics? If so, I believe the correct way to do this is with a \skip 1 command. -- Phil Holmes Bug Squad ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: png output with transparency and the option to have the renderingcropped to the score
"Bart Deruyter" wrote in message news:loom.20110719t173519-...@post.gmane.org... Hi, I have asked on the mailinglist how to output the lilypond file to a png with transparency and cropped to the score itself. It seems not to be possible in lilypond natively, but it would be very usefull. When creating a book with many, short pieces of music, it is handy to have high resolution png's with transparency, so they can be combined with differently colored backgrounds and images. Of course there is the option to render to svg, and edit the svg file, but that is a step too many when dealing with lot's of images. It would be great to see this feature appear in lilypond to render to png with transparency, and the option to crop to the score itself, without page background, nor margins. Thanks, Bart Deruyter I can't find whether this was ever answered, but a search of the mail lists shows that this can already be done: lilypond --png -dpixmap-format=pngalpha file.ly -- Phil Holmes Bug Squad ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Full measure rest should take more horizontal space
Hello,
In my everyday use of LilyPond I am often annoyed by the fact that
—especially in "tighter situations"— full measure rests take very
little horizontal space, hence their measure width are much more
*compressed* than neighbouring measures.
This results in IMHO poor output.
I do not know what "engraving references" say about the horizontal
_measure width_ in the case of "full measure rest" but I would have
expected a full measure rest to take as much horizontal space as the
corresponding-duration note (full measure-duration note).
Someone could confirm this?
Snippet
%% Full measure rest should take as much horizontal space as a note of
%% the same duration.
%% Currently the "whole rest" measure widths are smaller than
%% corresponding duration note and they are much more compressed in
%% "tighter situations".
%%
%% Note that the width of a full measure rest should adapt to its
%% duration, hence the solution of defining "minimum-length" is not
%% suitable for different time signatures. A full measure rest in
%% 2/4 should have a smaller width than a full measure rest in 4/4
%% because a whole takes much horizontal space than a half note.
%%
\version "2.15.7"
test = \relative c' {
c1
R1
c1
R1
\repeat unfold 2 c1
R1*2
\repeat unfold 2 c1
R1
\repeat unfold 2 c1
R1*2
\repeat unfold 2 c1
R1
c1
R1
c1
c1
}
\score {
\new Staff {
c'1^"current full bar rest width"
\test
}
}
\score {
\new Staff {
c'1^"new (expected) full bar rest width"
\test
}
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\override MultiMeasureRest #'minimum-length = #8
}
}
}
End of snippet
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1742 in lilypond: print transposed guitar chords on piano sheets
Updates: Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-review Comment #6 on issue 1742 by lemniska...@gmail.com: print transposed guitar chords on piano sheets http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1742 Interesting, nothing was wrong when i tried it previously... However, new patch from Wol fixes this - make and regtests are compiled nicely. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1663 in lilypond: Images missing on web site
Comment #19 on issue 1663 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Images missing on web site http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1663 Belay comment 17. I think I must have been looking at a page built with make docs. An update: The web index is in: file:///home/phil/lilypond-git/build/out-website/index.html Pictures are referenced as: They were: - so we have lost the ../pictures, as expected. On both the versions I'm looking at (one built from a git tree of at least a week ago, and one from yesterday) there are no actual pictures visible in the browser. Actually, that's not surprising. The only instances of "double-lily-modified3.png" are in: lilypond-git/Documentation/pictures (i.e. the source) lilypond-git/build/Documentation/pictures/out-www (the website created by make doc) lilypond-git/build/out-www/offline-root/Documentation/pictures (the final website created by make doc and with the links fixed up) If the make website-built website were to reference these, 1) we would always need to make doc before make website, which rather spoils the point of a slimmed-down make website; 2) we would need to change the links in the website-built html to something like ../Documentation/pictures/out-www, which is rather too specific and out-of-tree. I think we have 3 options (here presented in my order of preference) 1. Document the fact that make website contains no images (it also has no css, etc.) 2. Write a script that copies the relevant pictures to a out-website/pictures directory and ensure the html links are fixed up correctly. 3. Write a script that fixes the links in out-website to point at the Documentation directory and document that you must run make doc before make website. What do you think? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Full measure rest should take more horizontal space
Wow, i'm CCed! Why? 2011/7/31 Xavier Scheuer : > Hello, > > In my everyday use of LilyPond I am often annoyed by the fact that > —especially in "tighter situations"— full measure rests take very > little horizontal space, hence their measure width are much more > *compressed* than neighbouring measures. > This results in IMHO poor output. I think i agree that full measure rest should take the same amount of space as full measure note. > I do not know what "engraving references" say about the horizontal > _measure width_ in the case of "full measure rest" but I would have > expected a full measure rest to take as much horizontal space as the > corresponding-duration note (full measure-duration note). > Someone could confirm this? The only way of confirmation that comes to my mind (as i don't have any engraving books) is to go to imslp.org, click 'random page' 30 times and see what appears... It is a very brutal method. cheers, Janek ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1635 in lilypond: clean up misleading warnings in website build
Comment #46 on issue 1635 by philehol...@googlemail.com: clean up misleading warnings in website build http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1635 I think this is fixed. However, there are a number of references to "English only build" which I've clearly not tackled. I think the best way forward is to mark this fixed and start a new issue: "Improve how build system handles language variants" and look at the English-only as part of this. At present, the number of places where all the languages are defined is, um, sub-optimal. OK? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Full measure rest should take more horizontal space
- Original Message - From: "Janek Warchoł" To: "Xavier Scheuer" Cc: "lilypond-devel" ; "bug-lilypond" Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 11:52 AM Subject: Re: Full measure rest should take more horizontal space Wow, i'm CCed! Why? 2011/7/31 Xavier Scheuer : Hello, In my everyday use of LilyPond I am often annoyed by the fact that —especially in "tighter situations"— full measure rests take very little horizontal space, hence their measure width are much more *compressed* than neighbouring measures. This results in IMHO poor output. I think i agree that full measure rest should take the same amount of space as full measure note. I do not know what "engraving references" say about the horizontal _measure width_ in the case of "full measure rest" but I would have expected a full measure rest to take as much horizontal space as the corresponding-duration note (full measure-duration note). Someone could confirm this? The only way of confirmation that comes to my mind (as i don't have any engraving books) is to go to imslp.org, click 'random page' 30 times and see what appears... It is a very brutal method. cheers, Janek Gould and Read both strongly imply that a WMR should take up the same space as the equivalent note: we could discuss whether this is always a semi-breve, or whether it represents the timed length of the note in other time sigs than 4/4. Gould says "Position a rest exactly as if it were a note of equivalent duration" [except] "the semi-breve rest is placed at the visual centre of the bar". Read says "Written rests [..] are always given a time-value: that is, the rest symbols merely substitute for a written note value." -- Phil Holmes ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1781 in lilypond: Mac OS X 10.7 (Lion) cannot run LilyPond 2.14.x
Comment #5 on issue 1781 by chh...@gmail.com: Mac OS X 10.7 (Lion) cannot run LilyPond 2.14.x http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1781 I have rebuilt the Mac OS X GUI application (from macosx-lilypad branch) on 10.7. I have tested it on 10.7 and 10.6.7 (Intel only). On 10.7 the Point and click feature seems not working yet. The resulting App (without lilypond included) is attached. Also attached is a patch with some minor changes for the macosx-lilypad branch. A version for testing with an included Lilypond 2.14.2 is available here: http://www.klarinett.li/LilyPond-with-2.14.2.zip Attachments: LilyPond-lilypad.zip 4.6 MB 0001-fix-app-creation-on-Mac-OS-X-10.7.patch 2.1 KB ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1781 in lilypond: Mac OS X 10.7 (Lion) cannot run LilyPond 2.14.x
On Jul 31, 2011, at 13:04, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote: > A version for testing with an included Lilypond 2.14.2 is available here: > http://www.klarinett.li/LilyPond-with-2.14.2.zip > This works on OSX 10.7 Lion > Attachments: > LilyPond-lilypad.zip 4.6 MB > 0001-fix-app-creation-on-Mac-OS-X-10.7.patch 2.1 KB These were not attached on arrival. .F ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1781 in lilypond: Mac OS X 10.7 (Lion) cannot run LilyPond 2.14.x
Am 31.07.2011 um 14:31 schrieb Floris van Manen: >> Attachments: >> LilyPond-lilypad.zip 4.6 MB >> 0001-fix-app-creation-on-Mac-OS-X-10.7.patch 2.1 KB > These were not attached on arrival. The are attached to the bug report: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1781 Regards, Christian ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1063 in lilypond: Reverting nested property fails to restore default value if preceded by override in same grob
Updates: Owner: d...@gnu.org Comment #7 on issue 1063 by d...@gnu.org: Reverting nested property fails to restore default value if preceded by override in same grob http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1063 I am trying to tackle this. I am proceeding by making me acquainted with the code situation before the patch, and then I'll try analyzing the situation and what a fix would entail, cross-checking with this bug and the example in the regression. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1781 in lilypond: Mac OS X 10.7 (Lion) cannot run LilyPond2.14.x
"Christian Hitz" wrote in message news:e9bf70f0-90a7-4160-9a07-134087dec...@klarinett.li... Am 31.07.2011 um 14:31 schrieb Floris van Manen: Attachments: LilyPond-lilypad.zip 4.6 MB 0001-fix-app-creation-on-Mac-OS-X-10.7.patch 2.1 KB These were not attached on arrival. The are attached to the bug report: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1781 Regards, Christian Please DO NOT put large attachments on the bug tracker. Deleting attachments does not remove them from counting as part of the attachment limit. The default limit for attachments is only 50 Meg. I've just had this increased to 150 Megs, but it's not a good idea to use this as a way of passing files around - please put them on another site and put a link. -- Phil Holmes Bug Squad ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1781 in lilypond: Mac OS X 10.7 (Lion) cannot run LilyPond 2.14.x
On Jul 31, 2011, at 15:38, Christian Hitz wrote: > > Am 31.07.2011 um 14:31 schrieb Floris van Manen: >>> Attachments: >>> LilyPond-lilypad.zip 4.6 MB >>> 0001-fix-app-creation-on-Mac-OS-X-10.7.patch 2.1 KB >> These were not attached on arrival. > > The are attached to the bug report: > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1781 - '/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/python2.6/shutil.py', + '/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/python2.6/shutil.py', Maybe you could point to the internal python version in the Lilypond package rather then the system version. That might also solve the problem of conflicting libraries when trying to launch midi2ly . .F ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1635 in lilypond: clean up misleading warnings in website build
Comment #47 on issue 1635 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: clean up misleading warnings in website build http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1635 Sounds good to me, Phil. The new issue could become one of making language handling consistent across all components of the (refurbished/redesigned) build process, so it would require the refurbishment/redesign to happen first. ATM we're using make and StepMake, and there are probably other, GUB-like tools, which would be better suited. I'm in awe, by the way, of the work you've done so far to clean up the existing build: much less cluttered! ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
make doc
Hi Phil, I don't know if this is in relation with your work on extract_texi_filenames.py and don't remember if it was spitted before. Many of the calls to this script, especially each time it will process an out-www/web.texi I get something weird with "searchpath": No such file: file.itexi Search path: .:./out-www:. I'm in sync with 54b02666750062788185bd3f99e644d621e348c2 and about to push some xref-fixes on the French version. If interested, the 10 Mo of logs are available. Cheers, Jean-Charles ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1063 in lilypond: Reverting nested property fails to restore default value if preceded by override in same grob
Comment #8 on issue 1063 by d...@gnu.org: Reverting nested property fails to restore default value if preceded by override in same grob http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1063 Well, here is a first comment. Properties are a complex thing tied into various layers of contexts and possibly overriden at different levels. Property alists for nested contexts are stored with a clever Scheme via conses of the actual alist to be used, and the tail of the alist belonging to a different context. The various lists are not modified in-place but rather get stuff prepended and removed at front. If the tail gets out of sync with the respective parent, update_grob_properties resynchronizes them. In contrast, alists for nested properties are just copied around and modified accordingly. For that reason, the difference between a copied subproperty (and sibling subproperties) from an outer context and a native subproperty is not preserved. A revert of one subproperty can't determine whether its siblings originate as a (possibly outdated) copy of a parent context, or from setting it on its own. I am having problems understanding how the nesting of properties inside of properties can be simpler to resolve than the nesting of properties inside of contexts. I continue thinking about that. External insights welcome. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Lilynet down?
Hi all! Is there any problem with www.lilynet.net ? I'm landing at "Test Page for the Apache HTTP Server on Fedora" telling me: This page is used to test the proper operation of the Apache HTTP server after it has been installed. If you can read this page, it means that the web server installed at this site is working properly, but has not yet been configured. Cheers, Jean-Charles ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1732 in lilypond: occasional segfault when compiling input/regression/midi/key-initial.ly
Comment #7 on issue 1732 by mts...@gmail.com: occasional segfault when compiling input/regression/midi/key-initial.ly http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1732 Can someone who succeeds in recreating this error build a copy of guile with #include in the file where throw is defined and then put VALGRIND_PRINTF_BACKTRACE in the throw function (or some function in the chain). Then, link this against LilyPond and see if that gives more info. Cheers, MS ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1792 in lilypond: dot-notehead collision
Updates: Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review Comment #1 on issue 1792 by pkx1...@gmail.com: dot-notehead collision http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1792 Passes make and reg tests although in my case, the reg test 'before' was different - see attached: Not sure why this was, maybe Keith had something else on his tree? Anyway, the 'after' is the same as Keith's. Attachments: Screenshot.png 60.4 KB ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Issue 1794 in lilypond: Adds longas, maximas and non-standard tweaks to MultiMeasureRest
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Patch-review New issue 1794 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Adds longas, maximas and non-standard tweaks to MultiMeasureRest http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1794 http://codereview.appspot.com/4536068/ Passes make and there is a difference in the reg test but I am not sure if this is incorrect. There have already been a lot of reviewers, but I added this because it evidently isn't a trivial change. So at least we have a track for the reg test difference. James Attachments: Screenshot.png 99 KB ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1063 in lilypond: Reverting nested property fails to restore default value if preceded by override in same grob
Comment #9 on issue 1063 by d...@gnu.org: Reverting nested property fails to restore default value if preceded by override in same grob http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1063 Figure me annoyed. When a nested property is being set, all the subpaths leading to it are copied from the context carrying the top property of the nesting, and an augmented subpath is prepended. Any property lookup for any subpath of the top property will now happen through that copy. Regardless of whether subproperties in parenting contexts get modified. At the time that the whole tribe is copied, the relation to the originals gets lost. With the current data structures, subproperties can't be overridden and reverted as if they were independent from other properties of their tribe (in the same hierarchy). This is nothing one can fix by doctoring revert. The whole concept is broken if I understand this correctly. Can somebody give me an overview about what nested properties we currently have, and how they are accessed? Are any parent properties accessed with the expectation that a useful alist pops out? Or could we use different data structures for the parent properties in a hierarchy? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
RE: Lilynet down?
Hello, From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org [lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Jean-Charles Malahieude [lily...@orange.fr] Sent: 31 July 2011 18:41 To: Lily Bugs; lilypond-devel Subject: Lilynet down? Hi all! Is there any problem with www.lilynet.net ? I'm landing at "Test Page for the Apache HTTP Server on Fedora" telling me: This page is used to test the proper operation of the Apache HTTP server after it has been installed. If you can read this page, it means that the web server installed at this site is working properly, but has not yet been configured. --- Me too! --snip-- If you are a member of the general public: The fact that you are seeing this page indicates that the website you just visited is either experiencing problems, or is undergoing routine maintenance. --snip-- Sunday evening...I am guessing this is routine maintenance. Regards James ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1776 in lilypond: Doc: NR - Polymetric Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
Comment #9 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Hello, thanks for those examples that is perfect.
However, because I am curious (and don't a thing about this special
notation) can you tell me why
\relative c' {
\compoundMeter #'((1 4) (3 8 4))
\repeat unfold 5 c8 \repeat unfold 10 c16
}
\relative c' {
\compoundMeter #'((2) (3 8 4))
\repeat unfold 5 c8 \repeat unfold 10 c16
}
Fails? and why I get a different error for each case?
Id kind of expect
\compoundMeter #'((2) (3 8 4))
to be equiv of 2
3 + 8 + 4
Is this not allowed in music?
Or at the very least 2 + 2 + 2
3 8 4
Maybe this is an enhancement?
Again as an example
\compoundMeter #'((1 4) (3 8 4))
could be the same as 1 + 4 + 4
3 8 4
I hope this makes sense?
I just want to know what the limitations there are and if these are
@knownissues or bugs or something else I need to document.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
RE: png output with transparency and the option to have the renderingcropped to the score
Hello From: bug-lilypond-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org [bug-lilypond-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Phil Holmes [m...@philholmes.net] Sent: 31 July 2011 10:40 To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org Subject: Re: png output with transparency and the option to have the renderingcropped to the score "Bart Deruyter" wrote in message news:loom.20110719t173519-...@post.gmane.org... > Hi, > I have asked on the mailinglist how to output the lilypond file to a png > with > transparency and cropped to the score itself. It seems not to be possible > in > lilypond natively, but it would be very usefull. > > When creating a book with many, short pieces of music, it is handy to have > high > resolution png's with transparency, so they can be combined with > differently > colored backgrounds and images. Of course there is the option to render to > svg, > and edit the svg file, but that is a step too many when dealing with lot's > of > images. > > It would be great to see this feature appear in lilypond to render to png > with > transparency, and the option to crop to the score itself, without page > background, nor margins. > > Thanks, > > Bart Deruyter I can't find whether this was ever answered, but a search of the mail lists shows that this can already be done: lilypond --png -dpixmap-format=pngalpha file.ly --- Added by me in Documentation for Usage in 2.15.x tree. Doc: Usage added command for transparent pngs author James Lowe Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:03:48 + (23:03 +0100) committer James Lowe Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:03:49 + (23:03 +0100) commit eed7b5f33c8e40860924c414b0feae8e0393f39d James ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1793 in lilypond: Doc: change how lyrics in PianoStaff is documented
Comment #1 on issue 1793 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: change how lyrics in PianoStaff is documented http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1793 Just to add what was said before (as it is important in the context of editing the doc!) --snip- From: "ehzone" Sunday, July 31, 2011 6:48 AM The section has 2 examples meant to show how to place lyrics between the staves of a piano staff. The image accompanying the first example isn't correct; the lyrics should appear under the bass clef and not between the treble and bass. Actually this example should be removed and the text adjusted. Here's why: --snip-- ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1794 in lilypond: Adds longas, maximas and non-standard tweaks to MultiMeasureRest
Comment #1 on issue 1794 by bordage@gmail.com: Adds longas, maximas and non-standard tweaks to MultiMeasureRest http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1794 :o\ ... Sorry to bother you again with regtests, James, but you should get what is attached. You probably forgot to compile lilypond between the baseline and the check. As you can see, there should be a breve in every 3/2 measure. I can attach PNGs of regtests in the future, but it's much better if someone else than the patcher does it. Thank you, Bertrand Attachments: Capture.png 100 KB ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1794 in lilypond: Adds longas, maximas and non-standard tweaks to MultiMeasureRest
Comment #2 on issue 1794 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Adds longas, maximas and non-standard tweaks to MultiMeasureRest http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1794 Bertrand, Not a problem for me (takes me less time to build from scratch and reg check than make a decent pot of coffee). You were indeed correct - I even went back to deliberately forget the second make after the patch is applied - and my attached reg test is here, now. Looking the same as yours. I think I know how I made this mistake; multiple 'terminals' open with different histories stored in the shell. Sorry for this unnecessary work for you to tell me - but I guess this is why it is good to post *any* reg differences from someone who isn't the author of the patch :) if if the checker needs checking themselves sometimes. So this looks ok. Attachments: Screenshot.png 98.3 KB ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1781 in lilypond: Mac OS X 10.7 (Lion) cannot run LilyPond 2.14.x
Am 31.07.2011 um 16:50 schrieb Floris van Manen: > > On Jul 31, 2011, at 15:38, Christian Hitz wrote: > >> >> Am 31.07.2011 um 14:31 schrieb Floris van Manen: Attachments: LilyPond-lilypad.zip 4.6 MB 0001-fix-app-creation-on-Mac-OS-X-10.7.patch 2.1 KB >>> These were not attached on arrival. >> >> The are attached to the bug report: >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1781 > > > > - > '/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/python2.6/shutil.py', > + > '/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/python2.6/shutil.py', > > Maybe you could point to the internal python version in the Lilypond package > rather then the system version. Actually, that is what this line is for. It instructs py2app to copy shutil.py from the given location into the LilyPond.app package. > That might also solve the problem of conflicting libraries when trying to > launch midi2ly . You mean the following error? Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/midi2ly", line 54, in import midi ImportError: dlopen(/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/lib/lilypond/current/python/midi.so, 2): no suitable image found. Did find: /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/lib/lilypond/current/python/midi.so: mach-o, but wrong architecture I don't think there is a connection. This particular seems to indicate a 32bit to 64bit mismatch between Python and the midi library. Regards, Christian ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1403 in lilypond: Enhancement: defining postfix commands in Scheme.
Comment #1 on issue 1403 by d...@gnu.org: Enhancement: defining postfix commands in Scheme. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1403 Neil points out how to use a music function for creating non-parametric (constant) postevents. The postevents are true postevents not requiring a dash for using, but the creation of those events by a music function does require a dash. It should be easy enough to do the creation in Scheme though without the need of the awkward syntax. However, the resulting event identifiers are constants and can't take a parameter like music functions do. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1792 in lilypond: dot-notehead collision
Comment #2 on issue 1792 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: dot-notehead collision http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1792 the reg test 'before' was different As part of the patch, I needed to expand the regression test. I used the expanded test as the bug report. The before/after output comes from the input shown above in the bug report. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1789 in lilypond: \tweak does not work for changing control-points of any but the first tie in chorded notes
Comment #5 on issue 1789 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: \tweak does not work for
changing control-points of any but the first tie in chorded notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1789
Could you explain what you are trying to tell us?
That the control points looked good enough for those chords, that it was
unclear what improvement the bug-request was asking for.
Now I re-read the title and I get the point. Lilypond ignores the tweak to
control-points when she sets the second tie in the chord.
{
q }
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: make doc
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 06:29:33PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > No such file: file.itexi > Search path: .:./out-www:. Extremely normal; happens all the time. :( Cheers, - Graham ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
AmbitusAccidental avoid-slur not set?
\version "2.14.1"
\score {
\new Score {
\new Voice \with {\consists Ambitus_engraver} {
cis4( ees)
}
}
}
This results in this warning:
warning: Ignoring grob for slur: AmbitusAccidental. avoid-slur not set?
This may be more of a feature request. I believe this warning is
meaningless and should be removed. Since I don't think avoiding the
slur matters for AmbitusAccidental would it be fine to set it to any
value? If so then adding "(avoid-slur . inside)" to the
AmbitusAccidental section of define-grobs.scm would avoid this error.
Is there a better approach? Thanks for the help.
-Jay
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
