Re: Octavecheck?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote: > > Noeck wrote Wednesday, March 25, 2015 6:48 PM > > > Here is a guess what happens (even if that contradicts the docs): > > The following pitches are perhaps not relative to the octave check but > > to the previous pitch corrected by the octave check. > > That would be my explanation too. > > > This would explain it, but the docs would have to be corrected. > > Yes, it's a doc issue. But is it really useful in this form? > Does anyone use it? Greetings, Trevor, Noeck, et al. - Submitted as Issue 4338 : https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4338 Ralph ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Octavecheck?
Noeck wrote Wednesday, March 25, 2015 6:48 PM > Here is a guess what happens (even if that contradicts the docs): > The following pitches are perhaps not relative to the octave check but > to the previous pitch corrected by the octave check. That would be my explanation too. > This would explain it, but the docs would have to be corrected. Yes, it's a doc issue. But is it really useful in this form? Does anyone use it? Trevor ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Octavecheck?
Am 25.03.2015 um 18:38 schrieb tisimst:
> I think you are right, Nik. It should go to f' instead, based on the
> docs. Looks like a bug to me.
Here is a guess what happens (even if that contradicts the docs):
The following pitches are perhaps not relative to the octave check but
to the previous pitch corrected by the octave check.
I am commenting inside your example:
> \relative c'' {
> c4 f g f
>
> c4
> \octaveCheck c'
The c4 is a c'' -> check resets to c' -> following note is f'
> f
> \octaveCheck c'
Check passed -> continue relative to f' -> next note is g'
> g
> \octaveCheck c'
The g is a g' closer to a c'' -> check resets to g -> next note is f
> f
> }
This would explain it, but the docs would have to be corrected.
Btw, the other way to do octave checks seems more intuitive to me:
\relative c'' {
c4 f g f
c='4 f=' g='' f
}
Cheers,
Joram
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Octavecheck?
I think you are right, Nik. It should go to f' instead, based on the docs.
Looks like a bug to me. CC-ing the bug list.
- Abraham
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Nik Repka [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n17366...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm totally new to Lilypond... but while reading the manual, I have become
> seriously confused by the following example of octave check:
>
> \relative c'' {
> c4 f g f
>
> c4
> \octaveCheck c'
> f
> \octaveCheck c'
> g
> \octaveCheck c'
> f
> }
>
> I understand why the first and third octave checks fail... but I am
> uncertain why the last f (which appears in the output as the f below c') is
> chosen instead of f'. According to the manual (
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/changing-multiple-pitches),
> "If this [octave] check fails, a warning is printed, but the previous note
> is not changed. Future notes are relative to the controlpitch." However, f
> below c' is not "relative" to c' since it is a fifth away from c'. Or have
> I misunderstood what is meant by "relative"?
>
> Basically, my question is... why do we get f not f'?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Nik
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
> --
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Octavecheck-tp173661.html
> To start a new topic under User, email ml-node+s1069038n...@n5.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here
>
> .
> NAML
>
>
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
