[8u] jdk8\hotspot\src\os\windows\vm\version.rc(57) : warning RC4003: not enough actual parameters for macro 'STR'

2013-12-24 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi


On windows, the jdk8\hotspot\src\os\windows\vm\version.rc at line 57 is missing 
the HS_COMPANY:


BEGIN
BLOCK 04b0
BEGIN
VALUE CompanyName,  XSTR(HS_COMPANY)   \0
VALUE FileDescription,  XSTR(HS_FILEDESC)  \0
VALUE FileVersion,  XSTR(HS_DOTVER)\0
VALUE Full Version, XSTR(HS_BUILD_ID)  \0
VALUE InternalName, XSTR(HS_INTERNAL_NAME) \0
VALUE LegalCopyright,   XSTR(HS_COPYRIGHT) \0
VALUE OriginalFilename, XSTR(HS_FNAME) \0
VALUE ProductName,  XSTR(HS_NAME)  \0
VALUE ProductVersion,   XSTR(JDK_DOTVER)   \0
END


That is why the resource compiler is producing this warning

Z:\JDK\jdk8\hotspot\src\os\windows\vm\version.rc(57) : warning RC4003: not 
enough actual parameters for macro 'STR'




Here the fix to avoid this warning by setting up the HS_COMPANY to the 
COMPANY_NAME variable in make/windows/build.make


Francis

--- a/make/windows/build.make
+++ b/make/windows/build.make
@@ -147,6 +147,8 @@
 !endif
 !endif

+HS_COMPANY=$(COMPANY_NAME)
+
 # Following the Web Start / Plugin model here
 # We can have update versions like 01a, but Windows requires
 # we use only integers in the file version field.  So:





Re: [8] WXP fixes to avoid warning when compiling SA files

2013-12-21 Thread Francis ANDRE

Staffan

By the way, I am working on the jdk7u... Could you also take in charge the 
backport to the jdk7u?


Francis

Le 09/12/2013 13:25, Staffan Larsen a écrit :

This change looks good to me.

I have created https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029798 for this 
change, and I can sponsor it. There are currently no open repos for 
low-priority hotspot changes so I will have to wait before pushing the change.

/Staffan


On 7 dec 2013, at 18:25, Francis ANDRE francis.andre.kampb...@orange.fr wrote:


Hi

Compiling SA files leads to warning because of old or invalid options as below

set INCLUDE=C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\INCLUDE;C:\Program 
Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\include;C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual 
Studio 10.0\VC\INCLUDE;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\include
C:\progra~1\micros~2.0\vc\bin\cl.exe @C:\cygwin\tmp\nmE2.tmp
clÿ: Ligne de commande warning D9035ÿ: l'option 'GZ' est d‚conseill‚e et sera 
supprim‚e dans une version ult‚rieure
clÿ: Ligne de commande warning D9036ÿ: utilisez 'RTC1' … la place de 'GZ'
clÿ: Ligne de commande warning D9035ÿ: l'option 'o' est d‚conseill‚e et sera 
supprim‚e dans une version ult‚rieure
clÿ: Ligne de commande warning D9002ÿ: option '-YX' inconnue ignor‚e
clÿ: Ligne de commande warning D9030ÿ: '/Gm' incompatible avec le 
multitraitementÿ; commutateur /MP ignor‚
sadis.c


Here the diff

diff --git a/make/windows/makefiles/sa.make b/make/windows/makefiles/sa.make
--- a/make/windows/makefiles/sa.make
+++ b/make/windows/makefiles/sa.make
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
SA_LD_FLAGS = bufferoverflowU.lib
!endif
!else
-SA_CFLAGS = -nologo $(MS_RUNTIME_OPTION) -W3 -Gm $(GX_OPTION) -Od -D WIN32 -D _WINDOWS -D 
_DEBUG -D _CONSOLE -D _MBCS -YX
-FD -GZ -c
+SA_CFLAGS = -nologo $(MS_RUNTIME_OPTION) -W3 $(GX_OPTION) -Od -D WIN32 -D _WINDOWS -D _DEBUG 
-D _CONSOLE -D _MBCS -FD -RT
C1 -c
!if $(ENABLE_FULL_DEBUG_SYMBOLS) == 1
SA_CFLAGS = $(SA_CFLAGS) -ZI
!endif







[7u] diff fixes for export_debug_jdk in jdk/hotspot/make/Makefile

2013-12-21 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi

The export_debug_jdk target from jdk7u/hotspot/make/Makefile never exports the

Z:\JDK\hsx\jdk7u\hotspot\build\windows\export-windows-i586\debug directories 
into

Z:\JDK\hsx\jdk7u\hotspot\build\windows\jdk-windows-i586

but it updates
Z:\JDK\\hsx\jdk7u\hotspot\build\windows\jdk-windows-i586\debug which is 
useless...

Francis

Here the fixes:
diff --git a/make/Makefile b/make/Makefile
--- a/make/Makefile
+++ b/make/Makefile
@@ -242,12 +242,11 @@
   generic_export
 export_fastdebug_jdk::
 $(MAKE) BUILD_FLAVOR=$(@:export_%_jdk=%) \
-  VM_SUBDIR=$(@:export_%_jdk=%)  \
-  ALT_EXPORT_PATH=$(JDK_IMAGE_DIR)/$(@:export_%_jdk=%) \
+  VM_SUBDIR=$(@:export_%_jdk=%) ALT_EXPORT_PATH=$(JDK_IMAGE_DIR) \
   generic_export
 export_debug_jdk::
-$(MAKE) BUILD_FLAVOR=$(@:export_%_jdk=%) VM_SUBDIR=${VM_DEBUG} \
-  ALT_EXPORT_PATH=$(JDK_IMAGE_DIR)/$(@:export_%_jdk=%) \
+$(MAKE) BUILD_FLAVOR=$(@:export_%_jdk=%) \
+  VM_SUBDIR=${VM_DEBUG} ALT_EXPORT_PATH=$(JDK_IMAGE_DIR) \
   generic_export



Re: [8] WXP fixes to avoid warning when compiling SA files

2013-12-09 Thread Francis ANDRE

Staffan

Thank you for taking the fixes on your side.

Francis
Le 09/12/2013 13:25, Staffan Larsen a écrit :

This change looks good to me.

I have created https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029798 for this 
change, and I can sponsor it. There are currently no open repos for 
low-priority hotspot changes so I will have to wait before pushing the change.

/Staffan


On 7 dec 2013, at 18:25, Francis ANDRE francis.andre.kampb...@orange.fr wrote:


Hi

Compiling SA files leads to warning because of old or invalid options as below

set INCLUDE=C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\INCLUDE;C:\Program 
Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\include;C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual 
Studio 10.0\VC\INCLUDE;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\include
C:\progra~1\micros~2.0\vc\bin\cl.exe @C:\cygwin\tmp\nmE2.tmp
clÿ: Ligne de commande warning D9035ÿ: l'option 'GZ' est d‚conseill‚e et sera 
supprim‚e dans une version ult‚rieure
clÿ: Ligne de commande warning D9036ÿ: utilisez 'RTC1' … la place de 'GZ'
clÿ: Ligne de commande warning D9035ÿ: l'option 'o' est d‚conseill‚e et sera 
supprim‚e dans une version ult‚rieure
clÿ: Ligne de commande warning D9002ÿ: option '-YX' inconnue ignor‚e
clÿ: Ligne de commande warning D9030ÿ: '/Gm' incompatible avec le 
multitraitementÿ; commutateur /MP ignor‚
sadis.c


Here the diff

diff --git a/make/windows/makefiles/sa.make b/make/windows/makefiles/sa.make
--- a/make/windows/makefiles/sa.make
+++ b/make/windows/makefiles/sa.make
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
SA_LD_FLAGS = bufferoverflowU.lib
!endif
!else
-SA_CFLAGS = -nologo $(MS_RUNTIME_OPTION) -W3 -Gm $(GX_OPTION) -Od -D WIN32 -D _WINDOWS -D 
_DEBUG -D _CONSOLE -D _MBCS -YX
-FD -GZ -c
+SA_CFLAGS = -nologo $(MS_RUNTIME_OPTION) -W3 $(GX_OPTION) -Od -D WIN32 -D _WINDOWS -D _DEBUG 
-D _CONSOLE -D _MBCS -FD -RT
C1 -c
!if $(ENABLE_FULL_DEBUG_SYMBOLS) == 1
SA_CFLAGS = $(SA_CFLAGS) -ZI
!endif







[8] WXP minor fixes for a cleaner compile of c code

2013-12-07 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi

Below are some warnings produced by the build of jdk8.

Z:/JDK/jdk8/jdk/src/share/native/java/lang/Throwable.c(48) : warning C4028: 
paramétre formel 3 différent de la déclaration
Z:/JDK/jdk8/jdk/src/windows/native/java/io/WinNTFileSystem_md.c(363) : warning 
C4101: 'pathlen': variable locale non référencée
Z:/JDK/jdk8/jdk/src/windows/native/common/jdk_util_md.c(45) : warning C4101: 
'ret': variable locale non référencée
Z:/JDK/jdk8/jdk/src/share/bin/java.c(1253) : warning C4101: 'result': variable 
locale nonréférencée
Z:/JDK/jdk8/jdk/src/share/bin/parse_manifest.c(196) : warning C4244: 'fonction': 
conversion de 'jlong' en 'unsigned int', perte possible de données




And here are the fixes

diff --git a/src/share/bin/java.c b/src/share/bin/java.c
--- a/src/share/bin/java.c
+++ b/src/share/bin/java.c
@@ -1250,7 +1250,6 @@
 GetApplicationClass(JNIEnv *env)
 {
 jmethodID mid;
-jobject result;
 jclass cls = GetLauncherHelperClass(env);
 NULL_CHECK0(cls);
 NULL_CHECK0(mid = (*env)-GetStaticMethodID(env, cls,
diff --git a/src/share/bin/parse_manifest.c b/src/share/bin/parse_manifest.c
--- a/src/share/bin/parse_manifest.c
+++ b/src/share/bin/parse_manifest.c
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
 return (-1);
 if ((buffer = malloc(END_MAXLEN)) == NULL)
 return (-1);
-if ((bytes = read(fd, buffer, len))  0) {
+if ((bytes = read(fd, buffer, (size_t)len))  0) {
 free(buffer);
 return (-1);
 }
diff --git a/src/share/native/java/lang/Throwable.c 
b/src/share/native/java/lang/Throwable.c

--- a/src/share/native/java/lang/Throwable.c
+++ b/src/share/native/java/lang/Throwable.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
  * `this' so you can write 'throw e.fillInStackTrace();'
  */
 JNIEXPORT jobject JNICALL
-Java_java_lang_Throwable_fillInStackTrace(JNIEnv *env, jobject throwable, int 
dummy)
+Java_java_lang_Throwable_fillInStackTrace(JNIEnv *env, jobject throwable, jint 
dummy)

 {
 JVM_FillInStackTrace(env, throwable);
 return throwable;
diff --git a/src/windows/native/common/jdk_util_md.c 
b/src/windows/native/common/jdk_util_md.c

--- a/src/windows/native/common/jdk_util_md.c
+++ b/src/windows/native/common/jdk_util_md.c
@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
 JNIEXPORT HMODULE JDK_LoadSystemLibrary(const char* name) {
 HMODULE handle = NULL;
 char path[MAX_PATH];
-int ret;

 if (GetSystemDirectory(path, sizeof(path)) != 0) {
 strcat(path, \\);
diff --git a/src/windows/native/java/io/WinNTFileSystem_md.c 
b/src/windows/native/java/io/WinNTFileSystem_md.c

--- a/src/windows/native/java/io/WinNTFileSystem_md.c
+++ b/src/windows/native/java/io/WinNTFileSystem_md.c
@@ -360,7 +360,6 @@
   jobject file)
 {
 jint rv = 0;
-jint pathlen;

 WCHAR *pathbuf = fileToNTPath(env, file, ids.path);
 if (pathbuf == NULL)


Re: [8]: help on PKCS#11 tests build

2013-12-04 Thread Francis ANDRE
Agreed with Magnus the setting of the executable bits should be made 
explicitly somewhere to avoid such error...



Francis

Le 04/12/2013 19:05, Magnus Ihse Bursie a écrit :

So at least you find a likely cause for the issues Francis are seeing. :)

It feels a bit weird juggling around with permissions like that, but maybe 
there was no clear use-case for running this from hg?

/Magnus


4 dec 2013 kl. 16:38 skrev Mike Duigou mike.dui...@oracle.com:



On Dec 4 2013, at 06:06 , Magnus Ihse Bursie magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com 
wrote:


On 2013-11-22 10:12, Mike Duigou wrote:
the jdk/test/Makefile is normally responsible for setting the executable flags 
on those files but only does so before running the tests. If you are executing 
jtreg directly then the files aren't being made executable.

Hm, are you saying jtreg is setting executable flags for file in the hg repo? 
Isn't that a risk that it will be checked in if you're not careful?

I just checked and discovered that the executable bits setting is done only if 
the hg directory is absent. So setting the executable bits is likely only being 
done only on oracle's internal test machines which get their test source as a 
tarball rather than via an hg clone.

I am not familiar enough with the history to know what is expected to happen 
when tests are run from an hg clone. It looks like the choices are to 
temporarily or permanently set the executable flags to allow the tests to run.

Mike


/Magnus


Mike


On Nov 21 2013, at 20:49 , Francis ANDRE francis.andre.kampb...@orange.fr 
wrote:

Hi

Running TestInterop from the PKCS#11 test suite on a WXP/Cygwin/VS2010 
platform, one gets this exception

Caused by: java.io.IOException: Accès 
refusé.Z:\JDK\jdk8\jdk\test\sun\security\pkcs11\nss\lib\windows-i586\softokn3.dll

This exception appears because all dlls in the directory 
jdk8\jdk\test\sun\security\pkcs11\nss\lib\windows-i586\ are not executable. I 
looked at the various makefile for fixing this issue but did not found a 
relevant makefile.

In which makefile(s) those dlls like softtokn3.dll are build/copied ?

Francis

Beginning test run TestInterop...
Exception in thread main java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
   at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
   at 
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:
57)
   at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorIm
pl.java:45)
   at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:408)
   at PKCS11Test.getSunPKCS11(PKCS11Test.java:70)
   at PKCS11Test.testNSS(PKCS11Test.java:356)
   at PKCS11Test.main(PKCS11Test.java:89)
   at TestInterop.main(TestInterop.java:141)
Caused by: java.security.ProviderException: Initialization failed
   at sun.security.pkcs11.SunPKCS11.init(SunPKCS11.java:376)
   at sun.security.pkcs11.SunPKCS11.init(SunPKCS11.java:103)
   ... 8 more
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Accès refusé.
Z:\JDK\jdk8\jdk\test\sun\security\pkcs11\nss\lib\windows-i586\softokn3.dll
   at sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11.connect(Native Method)
   at sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11.init(PKCS11.java:138)
   at sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11.getInstance(PKCS11.java:151)
   at sun.security.pkcs11.SunPKCS11.init(SunPKCS11.java:313)
   ... 9 more




Re: [8]: help on PKCS#11 tests build

2013-12-04 Thread Francis ANDRE

There are 6 dlls in the test directory

./jdk/test/sun/security/pkcs11/nss/lib/windows-i586/libnspr4.dll
./jdk/test/sun/security/pkcs11/nss/lib/windows-i586/libplc4.dll
./jdk/test/sun/security/pkcs11/nss/lib/windows-i586/libplds4.dll
./jdk/test/sun/security/pkcs11/nss/lib/windows-i586/nss3.dll
./jdk/test/sun/security/pkcs11/nss/lib/windows-i586/nssckbi.dll
./jdk/test/sun/security/pkcs11/nss/lib/windows-i586/softokn3.dll

Francis

Le 05/12/2013 03:16, Bradford Wetmore a écrit :
IIRC, and in case it wasn't clear from reading the responses, the permission 
changes are done by the Makefiles (e.g. jdk/test/Makefile:193), and not by 
JTREG itself.


I agree with Jon's comment, perhaps a .dll copy to the temporary working 
directory is in order.  That would save people trying to figure out why their 
tests are failing when running under a .hg directory with the makefiles, or 
when using JTREG directly.


I'm not sure how many .dlls there are in the test dirs (including closed where 
most probably live), but should probably be done all together instead of by 
functional area.


Brad



On 12/4/2013 10:40 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:

It should also be the case that the tests should run if the entire test/
directory (all files and directories) were readonly, so if code is
modifying files in place or creating new files anywhere in the test
directory, that should be regarded as a Bad Thing and fixed.

-- Jon


On 12/04/2013 10:27 AM, Francis ANDRE wrote:

Agreed with Magnus the setting of the executable bits should be
made explicitly somewhere to avoid such error...


Francis

Le 04/12/2013 19:05, Magnus Ihse Bursie a écrit :

So at least you find a likely cause for the issues Francis are
seeing. :)

It feels a bit weird juggling around with permissions like that, but
maybe there was no clear use-case for running this from hg?

/Magnus


4 dec 2013 kl. 16:38 skrev Mike Duigou mike.dui...@oracle.com:



On Dec 4 2013, at 06:06 , Magnus Ihse Bursie
magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com wrote:


On 2013-11-22 10:12, Mike Duigou wrote:
the jdk/test/Makefile is normally responsible for setting the
executable flags on those files but only does so before running
the tests. If you are executing jtreg directly then the files
aren't being made executable.

Hm, are you saying jtreg is setting executable flags for file in
the hg repo? Isn't that a risk that it will be checked in if you're
not careful?

I just checked and discovered that the executable bits setting is
done only if the hg directory is absent. So setting the executable
bits is likely only being done only on oracle's internal test
machines which get their test source as a tarball rather than via an
hg clone.

I am not familiar enough with the history to know what is expected
to happen when tests are run from an hg clone. It looks like the
choices are to temporarily or permanently set the executable flags
to allow the tests to run.

Mike


/Magnus


Mike


On Nov 21 2013, at 20:49 , Francis ANDRE
francis.andre.kampb...@orange.fr wrote:

Hi

Running TestInterop from the PKCS#11 test suite on a
WXP/Cygwin/VS2010 platform, one gets this exception

Caused by: java.io.IOException: Accès
refusé.Z:\JDK\jdk8\jdk\test\sun\security\pkcs11\nss\lib\windows-i586\softokn3.dll 




This exception appears because all dlls in the directory
jdk8\jdk\test\sun\security\pkcs11\nss\lib\windows-i586\ are not
executable. I looked at the various makefile for fixing this
issue but did not found a relevant makefile.

In which makefile(s) those dlls like softtokn3.dll are
build/copied ?

Francis

Beginning test run TestInterop...
Exception in thread main
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
   at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native
Method)
   at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java: 



57)
   at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorIm 



pl.java:45)
   at
java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:408)
   at PKCS11Test.getSunPKCS11(PKCS11Test.java:70)
   at PKCS11Test.testNSS(PKCS11Test.java:356)
   at PKCS11Test.main(PKCS11Test.java:89)
   at TestInterop.main(TestInterop.java:141)
Caused by: java.security.ProviderException: Initialization failed
   at sun.security.pkcs11.SunPKCS11.init(SunPKCS11.java:376)
   at sun.security.pkcs11.SunPKCS11.init(SunPKCS11.java:103)
   ... 8 more
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Accès refusé.
Z:\JDK\jdk8\jdk\test\sun\security\pkcs11\nss\lib\windows-i586\softokn3.dll

   at sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11.connect(Native Method)
   at sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11.init(PKCS11.java:138)
   at
sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11.getInstance(PKCS11.java:151)
   at sun.security.pkcs11.SunPKCS11.init(SunPKCS11.java:313)
   ... 9 more










Re: Le roi est mort, vive le roi!

2013-11-26 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi Staffan
Le 25/11/2013 08:53, Staffan Larsen a écrit :



The top level make produces a full jdk here: 
Z:\JDK\jdk8\build\windows-x86-normal-server-release\images\j2sdk-image
The hotspot make produces a full jdk here : 
Z:\JDK\jdk8\hotspot\build\windows\jdk-windows-i586
The hotspot create.bat produces a JVM here: 
Z:\JDK\jdk8\hotspot\build\vs-i486\compiler1


create.bat has only one parameter: the bootstrap jdk and thus does not take 
into account the configure-based top-level files. Moreover when using an 
official public jdk7 release as the jdk1.7.0_45 as the bootstrap jdk of jdk8, 
the produced jvm.vxproj does not work as the changeset associated with the 
JDK 8016019 are not back ported to the jdk1.7.0_45 release. So I am wondering 
what specific parameters hotspot developers are using to test their changes 
under WXP/W7 for the jdk8 hotspot?


The visual studio projects are not the official way to build hotspot. They are 
provided as a nice-to-have feature that developers on windows maintain. The 
official way to build on all platforms is to use the makefiles.
Staffan, while the official way to build on all platforms is to use the 
makefiles, it does not make sense when talking about debugging, testing and 
developing a major, large, multi layered C++ application like hotspot.


To make it short, VisualStudio C++ is to c++ what Netbeans or Eclipse are for 
Java, a mandatory  powerful IDE for developping large and complex application. 
Can you image to code, develop, debug, test a multi-threaded java application fo 
250 kilo lines without Netbeans, just with vi, makefiles and some additional 
tools... I do not think so... So, it is the same for hotspot on WXP/W7!


Thus, if as I understand well, WXP/W7/ X86/X64 are strategic platfoms for Oracle 
in providing a fully certified and supported Java environment, then the 
nice-to-have feature is not at level of the mission. The generation of the 
jvm.vxproj cannot be a second level citizen but should be as good as the 
generation of the jdk, fully maintained and integrated as new features, way fo 
building the new build system and so on are added, modified or deleted


Francis



/Staffan




Francis


David
-



Francis



the jdk8 build system, but what is the old one?

Francis

Le 18/11/2013 19:02, Magnus Ihse Bursie a écrit :

So, finally it has happened. The old build system is now removed.
The patch was just submitted to the tl forest, from where it will
move to master in a few days.

If you have personal scripts that are using hard-coded makefile
references, you might need to update them.

Thanks to everyone who helped this major project become reality:
Fredrik, Erik, Kelly, Tim, Jonas, ...

/Magnus






Re: Le roi est mort, vive le roi!

2013-11-26 Thread Francis ANDRE

David


create.bat has only one parameter: the bootstrap jdk and thus does not
take into account the configure-based top-level files. Moreover when
using an official public jdk7 release as the jdk1.7.0_45 as the
bootstrap jdk of jdk8, the produced jvm.vxproj does not work as the
changeset associated with the JDK 8016019 are not back ported to the
jdk1.7.0_45 release. So I am wondering what specific parameters hotspot
developers are using to test their changes under WXP/W7 for the jdk8
hotspot?


Most developers don't use create.bat or the vs projects.

I am desesperated by your remark, really


David
-


Francis


David
-



Francis



the jdk8 build system, but what is the old one?

Francis

Le 18/11/2013 19:02, Magnus Ihse Bursie a écrit :

So, finally it has happened. The old build system is now removed.
The patch was just submitted to the tl forest, from where it will
move to master in a few days.

If you have personal scripts that are using hard-coded makefile
references, you might need to update them.

Thanks to everyone who helped this major project become reality:
Fredrik, Erik, Kelly, Tim, Jonas, ...

/Magnus















Re: Le roi est mort, vive le roi!

2013-11-24 Thread Francis ANDRE

Mike
Le 19/11/2013 19:14, Mike Duigou a écrit :

Early in jdk8 development it used the same build system as jdk7. A new build system was 
developed and eventually replaced the old build system. The removal in this 
changeset removed the obsolete legacy build system. There are no plans to backport the 
new build system to java 7.
Just to confirm my understanding, when Magnus or yourself speak about the old 
system as the jdk7 one, you are talking about the build of the subdirectory 
jdk8/jdk because the jdk8/hotspot is the same as in jdk7.


By the way, I am wondering in the new system  how you are planning the support 
the create.bat and the generation of the jcm.vxproj by ProjectCreator. 
VisualStudio C++ is a mandatory tool for testing, understanding and debugging 
hotspot. So what about the old hotspot build under jdk8?


Francis



the jdk8 build system, but what is the old one?

Francis

Le 18/11/2013 19:02, Magnus Ihse Bursie a écrit :

So, finally it has happened. The old build system is now removed. The patch was 
just submitted to the tl forest, from where it will move to master in a few 
days.

If you have personal scripts that are using hard-coded makefile references, you 
might need to update them.

Thanks to everyone who helped this major project become reality: Fredrik, Erik, 
Kelly, Tim, Jonas, ...

/Magnus







Re: Le roi est mort, vive le roi!

2013-11-24 Thread Francis ANDRE

David

Le 25/11/2013 02:55, David Holmes a écrit :

On 25/11/2013 1:46 AM, Francis ANDRE wrote:

Mike
Le 19/11/2013 19:14, Mike Duigou a écrit :

Early in jdk8 development it used the same build system as jdk7. A new
build system was developed and eventually replaced the old build
system. The removal in this changeset removed the obsolete legacy
build system. There are no plans to backport the new build system to
java 7.

Just to confirm my understanding, when Magnus or yourself speak about
the old system as the jdk7 one, you are talking about the build of the
subdirectory jdk8/jdk because the jdk8/hotspot is the same as in jdk7.


Not quite. The hotspot build system was not rewritten to require the 
configure-based top-level build, but it was modified to be aware of, and work 
with, a configure-based top-level build. A lot of hotspot developers only 
build hotspot, not the full JDK.

So David, how do they test their changes to hotspot?? with jtreg? another tool?



By the way, I am wondering in the new system  how you are planning the
support the create.bat and the generation of the jcm.vxproj by
ProjectCreator. VisualStudio C++ is a mandatory tool for testing,
understanding and debugging hotspot. So what about the old hotspot
build under jdk8?


Updates to those windows specific parts of the hotspot build have taken place 
as problems are detected. If there is something specific that is currently an 
issue then a bug needs to be filed against hotspot-build. The hotspot team 
generally handles this not the build team.
The top level make produces a full jdk here: 
Z:\JDK\jdk8\build\windows-x86-normal-server-release\images\j2sdk-image
The hotspot make produces a full jdk here : 
Z:\JDK\jdk8\hotspot\build\windows\jdk-windows-i586
The hotspot create.bat produces a JVM here: 
Z:\JDK\jdk8\hotspot\build\vs-i486\compiler1


create.bat has only one parameter: the bootstrap jdk and thus does not take into 
account the configure-based top-level files. Moreover when using an official 
public jdk7 release as the jdk1.7.0_45 as the bootstrap jdk of jdk8, the 
produced jvm.vxproj does not work as the changeset associated with the JDK 
8016019 are not back ported to the jdk1.7.0_45 release. So I am wondering what 
specific parameters hotspot developers are using to test their changes under 
WXP/W7 for the jdk8 hotspot?


Francis


David
-



Francis



the jdk8 build system, but what is the old one?

Francis

Le 18/11/2013 19:02, Magnus Ihse Bursie a écrit :

So, finally it has happened. The old build system is now removed.
The patch was just submitted to the tl forest, from where it will
move to master in a few days.

If you have personal scripts that are using hard-coded makefile
references, you might need to update them.

Thanks to everyone who helped this major project become reality:
Fredrik, Erik, Kelly, Tim, Jonas, ...

/Magnus











[8] langtools DocCommentTester.java:109: error: cannot find symbol

2013-11-22 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hello

I am running the langtools test suite with

/cygdrive/c/cygwin/usr/local/bin/make -k -C  ../langtools/test 
JT_JAVA=/cygdrive/Z/JDK/jdk8/build/windows-x86-normal-server-release/images/j2sdk-image 
TEST=jtreg jtreg


and got many compiles error. I think 
jdk8\build\windows-x86-normal-server-release\langtools\classes\com\sun\source\util 
directory is missing from the classpath but dot know how to fix it.


Any thought?

Francis

FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/Z/JDK/jdk8
$ hg tip
changeset:   908:0a6db1aac998
tag: tip
user:cl
date:Thu Nov 21 09:22:41 2013 -0800
summary: Added tag jdk8-b117 for changeset a4afb0a8d55e


--
TEST: tools/javac/doctree/AttrTest.java
JDK under test: 
(Z:\JDK\jdk8\build\windows-x86-normal-server-release\images\j2sdk-image)

openjdk version 1.8.0-internal
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 
1.8.0-internal-francisandre_2013_11_22_07_15-b00)
OpenJDK Server VM (build 25.0-b59, mixed mode)



ACTION: build -- Failed. Compilation failed: Compilation failed
REASON: User specified action: run build DocCommentTester
TIME:   1.75 seconds
messages:
command: build DocCommentTester
reason: User specified action: run build DocCommentTester
elapsed time (seconds): 1.75

ACTION: compile -- Failed. Compilation failed: Compilation failed
REASON: .class file out of date or does not exist
TIME:   1.734 seconds
messages:
command: compile -XDignore.symbol.file=true 
Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\test\tools\javac\doctree\DocCommentTester.java

reason: .class file out of date or does not exist
elapsed time (seconds): 1.734
rerun:
'PATH=C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\Common7\IDE;C:\Program 
Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\BIN;C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual 
Studio 
10.0\Common7\Tools;C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319;C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.5;C:\Program 
Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\VCPackages;C:\Program Files\HTML Help 
Workshop;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\bin\NETFX 4.0 
Tools;C:\Program Files\Microsoft 
SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\bin;C:\cygwin\usr\local\bin;C:\cygwin\bin;C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\system32;C:\WINDOWS\System32\Wbem;C:\Program 
Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\Common7\IDE;C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual 
Studio 10.0\VC\BIN;C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\Common7\Tools;C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319;C:\Program 
Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\VCPackages;C:\Program Files\Microsoft 
SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\bin\NETFX 4.0 Tools;C:\Program Files\Microsoft 
SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\bin;C:\Program Files\Apache Software 
Foundation\apache-ant-1.8.4\bin;C:\Program Files\Apache Software 
Foundation\apache-maven-3.0.3\bin' \

SystemDrive=C: \
'SystemRoot=C:\WINDOWS' \
'TEMP=C:\cygwin\tmp' \
'TMP=C:\cygwin\tmp' \
'windir=C:\WINDOWS' \
'Z:\JDK\jdk8\build\windows-x86-normal-server-release\images\j2sdk-image\bin\javac'
 \
-J-Xmx768m \
-J-Dtest.vm.opts=-Xmx768m \
-J-Dtest.class.path.prefix='Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\build\windows-i586\test\langtools\jtreg\JTwork\classes\1\tools\javac\doctree;Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\test\tools\javac\doctree' 
\
-J-Dtest.jdk='Z:\JDK\jdk8\build\windows-x86-normal-server-release\images\j2sdk-image' 
\

-J-Dtest.timeout.factor=1.0 \
-J-Dtest.src.path='Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\test\tools\javac\doctree' \
-J-Dtest.compiler.opts= \
-J-Dcompile.jdk='Z:\JDK\jdk8\build\windows-x86-normal-server-release\images\j2sdk-image' 
\
-J-Dtest.classes='Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\build\windows-i586\test\langtools\jtreg\JTwork\classes\1\tools\javac\doctree' 
\
-J-Dtest.class.path='Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\build\windows-i586\test\langtools\jtreg\JTwork\classes\1\tools\javac\doctree' 
\

-J-Dtest.java.opts= \
-J-Dtest.src='Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\test\tools\javac\doctree' \
-J-Dtest.tool.vm.opts=-J-Xmx768m \
-d 
'Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\build\windows-i586\test\langtools\jtreg\JTwork\classes\1\tools\javac\doctree' 
-classpath 
'Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\build\windows-i586\test\langtools\jtreg\JTwork\classes\1\tools\javac\doctree;Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\test\tools\javac\doctree;Z:\JDK\jdk8\build\windows-x86-normal-server-release\images\j2sdk-image\lib\tools.jar' 
-sourcepath 'Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\test\tools\javac\doctree' 
-XDignore.symbol.file=true 
'Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\test\tools\javac\doctree\DocCommentTester.java'

direct:
Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\test\tools\javac\doctree\DocCommentTester.java:109: error: 
cannot find symbol

static abstract class DeclScanner extends TreePathScannerVoid, Void {
  ^
  symbol:   class TreePathScanner
  location: class DocCommentTester
Z:\JDK\jdk8\langtools\test\tools\javac\doctree\DocCommentTester.java:113: error: 
cannot find symbol

public Void visitClass(ClassTree tree, Void ignore) {



[8]: help on PKCS#11 tests build

2013-11-21 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi

Running TestInterop from the PKCS#11 test suite on a WXP/Cygwin/VS2010 platform, 
one gets this exception


Caused by: java.io.IOException: Accès 
refusé.Z:\JDK\jdk8\jdk\test\sun\security\pkcs11\nss\lib\windows-i586\softokn3.dll


This exception appears because all dlls in the directory 
jdk8\jdk\test\sun\security\pkcs11\nss\lib\windows-i586\ are not executable. I 
looked at the various makefile for fixing this issue but did not found a 
relevant makefile.


In which makefile(s) those dlls like softtokn3.dll are build/copied ?

Francis

Beginning test run TestInterop...
Exception in thread main java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:

57)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorIm

pl.java:45)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:408)
at PKCS11Test.getSunPKCS11(PKCS11Test.java:70)
at PKCS11Test.testNSS(PKCS11Test.java:356)
at PKCS11Test.main(PKCS11Test.java:89)
at TestInterop.main(TestInterop.java:141)
Caused by: java.security.ProviderException: Initialization failed
at sun.security.pkcs11.SunPKCS11.init(SunPKCS11.java:376)
at sun.security.pkcs11.SunPKCS11.init(SunPKCS11.java:103)
... 8 more
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Accès refusé.
Z:\JDK\jdk8\jdk\test\sun\security\pkcs11\nss\lib\windows-i586\softokn3.dll
at sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11.connect(Native Method)
at sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11.init(PKCS11.java:138)
at sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11.getInstance(PKCS11.java:151)
at sun.security.pkcs11.SunPKCS11.init(SunPKCS11.java:313)
... 9 more



Re: [7u]: help on jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk

2013-11-20 Thread Francis ANDRE

Erik

How are you invoking the build to cause this error? Are you explicitly 
setting ALT_OUTPUTDIR?

I am invoking just: make sanity without explicitly setting ALT_OUTPUTDIR.


What is the path to your workspace?
FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/Z/JDK/jdk7u
$ hg path
default = http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u

FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/Z/JDK/jdk7u
$ hg root
/cygdrive/Z/JDK/jdk7u



I  extracted the relevant commands from the 
jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk into the joined test.mk file


if one runs make -f test.mk with $(if $(word 2,$1) at line 72, one gets
$ make -f test.mk
*OUTPUTDIR=./build/windows-i586**
**ABS_OUTPUTDIR=*
ALT_HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH=Z:/JDK/jdk7u/build/windows-i586/hotspot/import
_HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH2=
_HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH3=
HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH=Z:/JDK/jdk7u/build/windows-i586/hotspot/import
SYSTEMROOT=C:WINDOWS
xSYSTEMROOT=C:/WINDOWS
_system_root=C:/WINDOWS
FOO=Z:/JDK/jdk7u/build/windows-i586
BAR=C:/WINDOWS


if one runs make -f test.mk with $(if $(word 1,$1) at line 72, one gets
$ make -f test.mk
*OUTPUTDIR=./build/windows-i586**
**ABS_OUTPUTDIR=Z:/JDK/jdk7u/build/WINDOW~1*
ALT_HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH=Z:/JDK/jdk7u/build/windows-i586/hotspot/import
_HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH2=
_HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH3=
HOTSPOT_IMPORT_PATH=Z:/JDK/jdk7u/build/WINDOW~1/hotspot/import
SYSTEMROOT=C:WINDOWS
xSYSTEMROOT=C:/WINDOWS
_system_root=C:/WINDOWS
FOO=Z:/JDK/jdk7u/build/WINDOW~1
BAR=C:/WINDOWS


in both case, OUTPUTDIR is a relative path as ./build/windows-i586, but only 
the second computes properly the ABS_OUTPUTDIR as Z:/JDK/jdk7u/build/WINDOW~1. 
In the first case, ABS_OUTPUTDIR is empty with leads to the error ERROR: 
Trouble with the absolute path for OUTPUTDIR




Le 20/11/2013 10:47, Erik Joelsson a écrit :
The way I understand it $(if $(word 2,$1) is a check for whitespace in the 
input parameter. It's an optimization to avoid executing cygpath when it's not 
needed. The MixedPath macro cannot be used if the path contains a space. It 
also doesn't convert to an absolute path, just replacing cygwin specific paths 
with driveletter paths. The unfortunate effect of this is that FullPath 
behaves differently depending on if the path contains a space.


How are you invoking the build to cause this error? Are you explicitly setting 
ALT_OUTPUTDIR? What is the path to your workspace?


/Erik

On 2013-11-15 18:37, Francis ANDRE wrote:

Hi

I am trying to fix the following error

$ make sanity
jdk/make/common/shared/Defs.gmk:563: *** ERROR: Trouble with the absolute 
path for OUTPUTDIR './bui

ld/windows-i586'.  Stop.

and found the following code in jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk, line 
109


define FullPath
$(if $(word 2,$1),$(shell $(CYGPATH_CMD) $1 2 $(DEV_NULL)),$(call 
MixedPath,$(realpath $(subst ,,$1

endef

Can someone explain me what use case is covered by the $(word 2,$1) in the 
previous statement?


The error ERROR: Trouble with the absolute path for OUTPUTDIR can be fixed 
by replacing $(word 2,$1) by $(word 1,$1) but I cannot find a usage for the 
$(word 2,$1)


Francis





CYGWIN_HOME := C:/Cygwin
DEV_NULL = /dev/null
CYGPATH_CMD = cygpath -a -s -m
define PwdPath
$(shell cd $1 2 $(DEV_NULL)  pwd)
endef
define AbsPwdPathCheck
$(shell cd .. 2 $(DEV_NULL)  cd $1 2 $(DEV_NULL)  pwd)
endef

# Checks an ALT value for spaces (should be one word), 
#   warns and returns Check_ALT_$1 if spaces
define AltCheckSpaces
$(if $(word 2,$($1)),$(warning WARNING: Value of $1 contains a space: '$($1)', 
check or set ALT_$1)Check_ALT_$1,$($1))
endef

# Checks an ALT value for empty, warns and returns Check_ALT_$1 if empty
define AltCheckValue
$(if $($1),$($1),$(warning WARNING: Value of $1 cannot be empty, check or set 
ALT_$1)Check_ALT_$1)
endef

# Checks any value for empty, warns and returns $2 if empty
define CheckValue
$(if $($1),$($1),$(warning WARNING: Value of $1 cannot be empty, will use 
'$2')$2)
endef

# Prefix for a utility prefix path, if empty leave alone, otherwise end with a /
define PrefixPath
$(if $1,$(subst //,/,$1/),)
endef
define DirExists
$(shell if [ -d $1 ]; then echo $1; elif [ -d $2 ]; then  echo $2;  
else  echo $3;  fi)
endef

# Select a directory if it exists, or the alternate 2, or the alternate 3, or 
the alternate 4
define DirExists4
$(shell \
  if [ -d $1 ]; then  \
echo $1; \
  elif [ -d $2 ]; then \
echo $2; \
  elif [ -d $3 ]; then \
echo $3; \
  else \
echo $4; \
  fi)
endef


define ToUpper
$(subst a,A,$(subst b,B,$(subst c,C,$(subst d,D,$(subst e,E,$(subst f,F,\
$(subst g,G,$(subst h,H,$(subst i,I,$(subst j,J,$(subst k,K,$(subst l,L,\
$(subst m,M,$(subst n,N,$(subst o,O,$(subst p,P,$(subst q,Q,$(subst r,R,\
$(subst s,S,$(subst t,T,$(subst u,U,$(subst v,V,$(subst w,W,$(subst x,X,\
$(subst y,Y,$(subst z,Z,$1))
endef

# All possible drive letters
drives=a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z
#drives=A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

# Convert /cygdrive/ paths to the mixed style

Re: RFR: Bug ID: 9007227: - make/sanity-rules.gmk:61: *** multiple target patterns. Stop

2013-11-20 Thread Francis ANDRE


Le 20/11/2013 08:37, Ivan Krylov a écrit :
I went through the exercise of building openjdk 7-8 on Windows and concur it 
isn't trivial. But google helps and I found very the helpful Volker's blogpost 
very quickly.
A build system should be ideally self contained, including its documentation. 
This means that there should be no need to gogol for finding out additional 
help. There is already the problem of non proprietary additional software for 
building OpenJDK and centralizing all pieces in a single place seems to me a 
good idea. Moreover, the day the Simonis'blog is removed for any reason, one 
looses this Window's focused paper...
This problem should not be solved by adding extra pointer to workarounds. The 
build system on Windows should work with the latest Cygwin's make. I think 
that the openjdk community is big enough to influence and push through all 
necessary fixes into make.
I already exchange with the Cygwin guys for making ksh recognizing windows path 
for the webrev.ksh script...they said clearly no way...


Francis


Ivan

On 11/19/13 11:05 AM, Francis ANDRE wrote:

Hi Dalibor

Everybody at Oracle and may be elsewhere knows how difficult is the task of 
building OpenJDK on WXP/W7. There was even in a previous OpenJDK contest a 
proposal for making this windows build smoother... Thus, the blog of Volker 
SIMONIS is really of a great help to avoid loosing time, energy and aspirine 
for building OpenJDK on Windows. I was specially redevable to Volker on the 
chapter about the specific version of Make 3.82 which in the standard cygwin 
delivery does not understand the Windows Letter based path. Without his guide 
on compiling and running the latest Make out of cygwin, NO ONE, and I repeat, 
NO ONE can make the OpenJDK because it fails without a clear and 
understandable errors. Moreover, when asking the build list about those 
errors, no one answers because no one can imagine that the Cygwin make cannot 
manage Windows letter based path.


So, yes, adding the blog of Wolker SIMONIS or may be a reformatted text*is a 
major help for building OpenJDK on windows*.


Please, reconsider your position on adding this blog post as a README file.

Francis



Le 18/11/2013 20:11, Dalibor Topic a écrit :

On 10/6/13 8:37 PM, Francis ANDRE wrote:

Hi

I submit this patch for review for this Bug ID: 9007227: - 
make/sanity-rules.gmk:61: *** multiple target patterns. Stop


The webrev.ksh is broken on WXP/Cygwin. So I am providing here the hg 
outgoing report as well as the new file README-Windows-Cygwin-VS2010
I don't think that it's necessary to include blog posts in the source code 
archives. ;)


cheers,
dalibor topic









Re: RFR: Bug ID: 9007227: - make/sanity-rules.gmk:61: *** multiple target patterns. Stop

2013-11-20 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi Erik

Le 20/11/2013 11:06, Erik Joelsson a écrit :
We identified cygwin make's inability to handle driveletter paths as one of 
the big problems with the old build system when starting the build-infra work 
for jdk8. So we designed the new build system to not use any mixed paths to 
avoid this problem.
Yes, you are right for the building of the jdk but that's only a part of the 
whole job. When talking about tests -- jtreg in particular --, you need to go 
back to the path handled by Java on windows and in that case, cygwin path does 
not work at all, only windows path with letter and '/' are working... So mixed 
path is a good compromise on windows for building, testing and delivering the 
full product


The problem with driveletter paths is also stated in the current 
README-builds.html and a number of workarounds are mentioned.
True, but all specific turn arounds for windows and cygwin and dependent third 
party software builds are disseminated all along the README-builds.html, which 
are making the build not so obvious. Even if one dislikes Windows, it is a so 
important platform for the Java ecosystem that it would make sense, from my 
point of view, to have a specific, Windows focused README...
I agree that documentation can always be improved however, and would encourage 
suggesting improvements to the current documentation rather than duplicating 
and making it redundant.

Ok..got the point


/Erik

On 2013-11-20 08:37, Ivan Krylov wrote:
I went through the exercise of building openjdk 7-8 on Windows and concur it 
isn't trivial. But google helps and I found very the helpful Volker's 
blogpost very quickly.
This problem should not be solved by adding extra pointer to workarounds. The 
build system on Windows should work with the latest Cygwin's make. I think 
that the openjdk community is big enough to influence and push through all 
necessary fixes into make.


Ivan

On 11/19/13 11:05 AM, Francis ANDRE wrote:

Hi Dalibor

Everybody at Oracle and may be elsewhere knows how difficult is the task of 
building OpenJDK on WXP/W7. There was even in a previous OpenJDK contest a 
proposal for making this windows build smoother... Thus, the blog of Volker 
SIMONIS is really of a great help to avoid loosing time, energy and aspirine 
for building OpenJDK on Windows. I was specially redevable to Volker on the 
chapter about the specific version of Make 3.82 which in the standard cygwin 
delivery does not understand the Windows Letter based path. Without his 
guide on compiling and running the latest Make out of cygwin, NO ONE, and I 
repeat, NO ONE can make the OpenJDK because it fails without a clear and 
understandable errors. Moreover, when asking the build list about those 
errors, no one answers because no one can imagine that the Cygwin make 
cannot manage Windows letter based path.


So, yes, adding the blog of Wolker SIMONIS or may be a reformatted text*is a 
major help for building OpenJDK on windows*.


Please, reconsider your position on adding this blog post as a README file.

Francis



Le 18/11/2013 20:11, Dalibor Topic a écrit :

On 10/6/13 8:37 PM, Francis ANDRE wrote:

Hi

I submit this patch for review for this Bug ID: 9007227: - 
make/sanity-rules.gmk:61: *** multiple target patterns. Stop


The webrev.ksh is broken on WXP/Cygwin. So I am providing here the hg 
outgoing report as well as the new file README-Windows-Cygwin-VS2010
I don't think that it's necessary to include blog posts in the source code 
archives. ;)


cheers,
dalibor topic











Re: Le roi est mort, vive le roi!

2013-11-19 Thread Francis ANDRE

Magnus

By the way, what is exactly the old build system??? I am aware of the jdk7u 
build system, the jdk8 build system, but what is the old one?


Francis

Le 18/11/2013 19:02, Magnus Ihse Bursie a écrit :
So, finally it has happened. The old build system is now removed. The patch 
was just submitted to the tl forest, from where it will move to master in a 
few days.


If you have personal scripts that are using hard-coded makefile references, 
you might need to update them.


Thanks to everyone who helped this major project become reality: Fredrik, 
Erik, Kelly, Tim, Jonas, ...


/Magnus





Re: Le roi est mort, vive le roi!

2013-11-19 Thread Francis ANDRE

Ok, but does this mean that no one is interested in fixing the old jdk7u 
system?

(I posted an help message about [7u]: help on 
jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk and got no answer, while the fix I am 
proposing will make the build in jdk7u easier by fixing this error  ERROR: 
Trouble with the absolute path for OUTPUTDIR!!)


Francis

Le 19/11/2013 19:14, Mike Duigou a écrit :

On Nov 19 2013, at 09:26 , Francis ANDRE francis.andre.kampb...@orange.fr 
wrote:


Magnus

By the way, what is exactly the old build system??? I am aware of the jdk7u 
build system,

Early in jdk8 development it used the same build system as jdk7. A new build system was 
developed and eventually replaced the old build system. The removal in this 
changeset removed the obsolete legacy build system. There are no plans to backport the 
new build system to java 7.


the jdk8 build system, but what is the old one?

Francis

Le 18/11/2013 19:02, Magnus Ihse Bursie a écrit :

So, finally it has happened. The old build system is now removed. The patch was 
just submitted to the tl forest, from where it will move to master in a few 
days.

If you have personal scripts that are using hard-coded makefile references, you 
might need to update them.

Thanks to everyone who helped this major project become reality: Fredrik, Erik, 
Kelly, Tim, Jonas, ...

/Magnus







Re: 7u40 on WXP/Cygwin: webrev: Is there a java or ant version of webrev?

2013-11-18 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi Magnus

This thread is quite an old thread on the webrev/ksh topic and I already told 
you in a previous thread that the problem was coming from the TortoiseHG that 
was located in the PATH before the cygwin hg. The real problem is the mix of ksh 
and TortoiseHG and thus only webrev got this issue because it cannot be run 
under another shell. TortoiseHG alone works pretty well with cygwin and the gnu 
make.


I would suggest to add in the cygwin section of the README-build.html a line for 
hg mercurial


NameCategoryPackage Description
hg.exe  Devel   binutilsPython based distributed version control system 
(DVCS)


and specify also that the local TortoiseHG binaries be removed from the path.

Francis


Le 18/11/2013 21:22, Magnus Ihse Bursie a écrit :

You should never use dos (or mixed) style paths, like Z:/dev, in Cygwin.

Since Cygwin never presents $PWD like that, I suspect the problem is that you 
have gotten a bad path somewhere, most likely in your hgrc.

What does cat .hg/hgrc say?

And - importantly - did you clone the repo using hg from Cygwin and not 
TortoiseHG? The latter does not work well with Cygwin, and could very well end 
up writing a dos/mixed style path to the hgrc, which would then cause webrev to 
fail.

/Magnus


5 okt 2013 kl. 15:28 skrev Francis ANDRE francis.andre.kampb...@orange.fr:

Hi Builders

I am really fighting against the triumvira (Cygwin, ksh, webrev.ksh) because of 
a bug in the cd command of the korn shell under cygwin -- log  below --. The cd 
command prepends the target directory where to go by the current $PWD.

cd Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/make/windows/makefiles becomes
cd 
/cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/make/windows/makefiles

and for sure, the translated directory does not exist.

So, it is clear that's not a problem with webrev.ksh but I am stacked with and 
I have no idea when this problem will be fixed in the Cygwin tool.  Thus I am 
wondering if there is a java or ant version of webrev because I am not able to 
fix this issue in a 3000+ lines of ksh while that's not a problem in java or 
ant.

Francis

$ ksh ./make/scripts/webrev.ksh -v
./make/scripts/webrev.ksh version: 23.18-hg+jbs
   SCM detected: mercurial
  Workspace: Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot
Compare against: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/hotspot
  Output to: Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/webrev
   Output Files:
./make/scripts/webrev.ksh[2899]: cd: 
/cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/make/windows/makefiles:
 No such file or directory
abort: cannot follow file not in parent revision: sa.make 
make/windows/makefiles/sa.make
./make/scripts/webrev.ksh[2899]: cd: 
/cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/make/windows/makefiles:
 No such file or directory
*** Error: file not in parent or child




Re: RFR: Bug ID: 9007227: - make/sanity-rules.gmk:61: *** multiple target patterns. Stop

2013-11-18 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi Dalibor

Everybody at Oracle and may be elsewhere knows how difficult is the task of 
building OpenJDK on WXP/W7. There was even in a previous OpenJDK contest a 
proposal for making this windows build smoother... Thus, the blog of Volker 
SIMONIS is really of a great help to avoid loosing time, energy and aspirine for 
building OpenJDK on Windows. I was specially redevable to Volker on the chapter 
about the specific version of Make 3.82 which in the standard cygwin delivery 
does not understand the Windows Letter based path. Without his guide on 
compiling and running the latest Make out of cygwin, NO ONE, and I repeat, NO 
ONE can make the OpenJDK because it fails without a clear and understandable 
errors. Moreover, when asking the build list about those errors, no one answers 
because no one can imagine that the Cygwin make cannot manage Windows letter 
based path.


So, yes, adding the blog of Wolker SIMONIS or may be a reformatted text*is a 
major help for building OpenJDK on windows*.


Please, reconsider your position on adding this blog post as a README file.

Francis



Le 18/11/2013 20:11, Dalibor Topic a écrit :

On 10/6/13 8:37 PM, Francis ANDRE wrote:

Hi

I submit this patch for review for this Bug ID: 9007227: - 
make/sanity-rules.gmk:61: *** multiple target patterns.  Stop

The webrev.ksh is broken on WXP/Cygwin. So I am providing here the hg outgoing 
report as well as the new file README-Windows-Cygwin-VS2010

I don't think that it's necessary to include blog posts in the source code 
archives. ;)

cheers,
dalibor topic




[7u]: help on jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk

2013-11-15 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi

I am trying to fix the following error

$ make sanity
jdk/make/common/shared/Defs.gmk:563: *** ERROR: Trouble with the absolute path 
for OUTPUTDIR './bui

ld/windows-i586'.  Stop.

and found the following code in jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk, line 
109

define FullPath
$(if $(word 2,$1),$(shell $(CYGPATH_CMD) $1 2 $(DEV_NULL)),$(call 
MixedPath,$(realpath $(subst ,,$1

endef

Can someone explain me what use case is covered by the $(word 2,$1) in the 
previous statement?


The error ERROR: Trouble with the absolute path for OUTPUTDIR can be fixed by 
replacing $(word 2,$1) by $(word 1,$1) but I cannot find a usage for the $(word 
2,$1)


Francis


Re: Help: jdk/make/common/shared/Defs.gmk:563: *** ERROR: Trouble with the absolute path for OUTPUTDIR '

2013-11-05 Thread Francis ANDRE

Mike
Le 05/11/2013 07:16, Mike Duigou a écrit :

Hi

Using a fresh copy of the jdk7u repository, and running make -d sanity, I got 
the error below. Why OUTPUTDIR must be absolute or if it must be absolute, why 
it is not when running make sanity?

In general, using absolute paths always helps for this kind of configuration 
work.
I do not understand your remark. I did not specify anything for OUTPUTDIR, 
neither on the command line, neither as exported variable. OUTPUT is computed by 
one of the included makefile and no one should have to specify it by default 
since by the end, its value is build/windows-i586 relative to the top level 
directory.

It seems to me that OUTPUTDIR is computed in the jdk subdirectory makefiles 
while it is not in the top level Makefile. Thus, the check that it must be 
absolute in the included jdk/make/common/shared/Defs.gmk fails. The only way I 
found to bypass this error is to set 
ALT_OUTPUTDIR=Z:/JDK/hsx/jdk7u/build/windows-i586

It seems like passing an absolute OUTPUTDIR is the solution and I suspect it 
should be a /cydrive path not a native path.
From my point of view, it seems more a conflicting option setting between the 
top level single Makefile and all the jdk subdir makefiles.


Be aware that it is not possible to build OpenJDK on Windows. There are 
components and build logic missing (FreeType among them) that would be 
necessary to build a working JDK. Unless you are working on adding the missing 
components, attempting to build OpenJDK on Windows is probably destined to be a 
fruitless endeavour. If you are interested in working on adding support for 
Windows to OpenJDK builds (as opposed to Oracle Java which does have Windows 
builds) then the jdk 8 project is probably a more worthwhile direction.

Please look at this URL:

https://weblogs.java.net/blog/simonis/archive/2011/10/28/yaojowbi-yet-another-openjdk-windows-build-instruction?force=510 



where Volker SIMONIS explains all bits and bytes for building OpenJDK on 
Windows. This works!


Mike


Francis

FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/Z/JDK/hsx/jdk7u
$ make -d sanity
GNU Make 3.82
Built for i686-pc-cygwin
Copyright (C) 2010  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Reading makefiles...
Reading makefile `Makefile'...
Reading makefile `jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-control.gmk' (search path) (no ~ 
expansion)...
Reading makefile `jdk/make/common/shared/Platform.gmk' (search path) (no ~ 
expansion)...
Reading makefile `jdk/make/common/shared/Defs.gmk' (search path) (no ~ 
expansion)...
Reading makefile `jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-utils.gmk' (search path) (no ~ 
expansion)...
Reading makefile `jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-versions.gmk' (search path) (no ~ 
expansion)...
Reading makefile `jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk' (search path) (no ~ 
expansion)...
jdk/make/common/shared/Defs.gmk:563: *** ERROR: Trouble with the absolute path 
for OUTPUTDIR './bui
ld/windows-i586'.  Stop.

FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/Z/JDK/hsx/jdk7u
$ env | grep ALT
ALT_SLASH_JAVA=C:/Progra~1/Java/jdk1.7.0_45
ALT_FREETYPE_HEADERS_PATH=Z:/JDK/freetype-2.4.7/include
ALT_JDK_IMPORT_PATH=C:/Progra~1/Java/jdk1.7.0_45
ALT_FREETYPE_LIB_PATH=Z:/JDK/freetype-2.4.7/objs/win32/vc2010
ALT_DXSDK_PATH=C:/PROGRA~1/MI7482~1
ALT_BOOTDIR=C:/Progra~1/Java/jdk1.7.0_45






Help: jdk/make/common/shared/Defs.gmk:563: *** ERROR: Trouble with the absolute path for OUTPUTDIR '

2013-11-04 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi

Using a fresh copy of the jdk7u repository, and running make -d sanity, I got 
the error below. Why OUTPUTDIR must be absolute or if it must be absolute, why 
it is not when running make sanity?


It seems to me that OUTPUTDIR is computed in the jdk subdirectory makefiles 
while it is not in the top level Makefile. Thus, the check that it must be 
absolute in the included jdk/make/common/shared/Defs.gmk fails. The only way I 
found to bypass this error is to set 
ALT_OUTPUTDIR=Z:/JDK/hsx/jdk7u/build/windows-i586


Francis

FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/Z/JDK/hsx/jdk7u
$ make -d sanity
GNU Make 3.82
Built for i686-pc-cygwin
Copyright (C) 2010  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Reading makefiles...
Reading makefile `Makefile'...
Reading makefile `jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-control.gmk' (search path) (no ~ 
expansion)...
Reading makefile `jdk/make/common/shared/Platform.gmk' (search path) (no ~ 
expansion)...

Reading makefile `jdk/make/common/shared/Defs.gmk' (search path) (no ~ 
expansion)...
Reading makefile `jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-utils.gmk' (search path) (no ~ 
expansion)...
Reading makefile `jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-versions.gmk' (search path) (no ~ 
expansion)...
Reading makefile `jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk' (search path) (no ~ 
expansion)...
jdk/make/common/shared/Defs.gmk:563: *** ERROR: Trouble with the absolute path 
for OUTPUTDIR './bui

ld/windows-i586'.  Stop.

FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/Z/JDK/hsx/jdk7u
$ env | grep ALT
ALT_SLASH_JAVA=C:/Progra~1/Java/jdk1.7.0_45
ALT_FREETYPE_HEADERS_PATH=Z:/JDK/freetype-2.4.7/include
ALT_JDK_IMPORT_PATH=C:/Progra~1/Java/jdk1.7.0_45
ALT_FREETYPE_LIB_PATH=Z:/JDK/freetype-2.4.7/objs/win32/vc2010
ALT_DXSDK_PATH=C:/PROGRA~1/MI7482~1
ALT_BOOTDIR=C:/Progra~1/Java/jdk1.7.0_45


[7u] WXP/Cygwin/VS2010 patch to remove invali option from the SA compilation

2013-11-01 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi

Following is a patch to avoid warning messages produced by the VS2010 compiler 
when compiling SA as


cl: Ligne de commande warning D9035: l'option 'GZ' est deconseille et sera 
supprime dans une version ulterieure

cl: Ligne de commande warning D9036: utilisez 'RTC1' … la place de 'GZ'
cl: Ligne de commande warning D9035: l'option 'o' est deconseille et sera 
supprime dans une version ultrieure

cl: Ligne de commande warning D9002: option '-YX' inconnue ignoree


here the patch
---
diff --git a/make/windows/makefiles/sa.make b/make/windows/makefiles/sa.make
--- a/make/windows/makefiles/sa.make
+++ b/make/windows/makefiles/sa.make
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
SA_LD_FLAGS = bufferoverflowU.lib
!endif
!else
-SA_CFLAGS = -nologo $(MS_RUNTIME_OPTION) -W3 -Gm $(GX_OPTION) -Od -D WIN32 -D 
_WINDOWS -D _DEB

UG -D _CONSOLE -D _MBCS -YX -FD -GZ -c
+SA_CFLAGS = -nologo $(MS_RUNTIME_OPTION) -W3 -Gm $(GX_OPTION) -Od -D WIN32 -D 
_WINDOWS -D _DEB

UG -D _CONSOLE -D _MBCS -FD -RTC1 -c
!if $(ENABLE_FULL_DEBUG_SYMBOLS) == 1
SA_CFLAGS = $(SA_CFLAGS) -ZI
!endif


Francis


[7u]: ERROR: Trouble with the absolute path for OUTPUTDIR './bui, ld/windows-i586'. Stop.

2013-10-13 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi

Just cloning this repository http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u to a fresh 
new directory on a WXP/Cygwin platform with the following ALT_* variables


$ env | grep ALT
ALT_BOOTDIR=C:/Progra~1/Java/jdk1.7.0_40
ALT_SLASH_JAVA=C:/Progra~1/Java/jdk1.7.0_40
ALT_JDK_IMPORT_PATH=C:/Progra~1/Java/jdk1.7.0_40
ALT_FREETYPE_HEADERS_PATH=C:/Cygwin/OpenJDK/freetype-2.4.7/include
ALT_FREETYPE_LIB_PATH=C:/Cygwin/OpenJDK/freetype-2.4.7/objs/win32/vc2010
ALT_DXSDK_PATH=C:/PROGRA~1/MI7482~1
FREETYPE2_LIB_PATH=C:/Cygwin/OpenJDK/freetype-2.4.7/objs/win32/vc2010


FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/Z/JDK/jdk7u
$ make sanity
jdk/make/common/shared/Defs.gmk:559: *** ERROR: Trouble with the absolute path 
for OUTPUTDIR './bui

ld/windows-i586'.  Stop.


My understanding is that there is no need to specify the ALT_OUTPUTDIR but it 
seems to be needed by make sanity.


Did I miss something?

Francis




Re: RFR (S): JDK-8025933 Configure should support French cl.exe

2013-10-07 Thread Francis ANDRE


Le 07/10/2013 11:32, Magnus Ihse Bursie a écrit :

On 2013-10-06 05:19, David Holmes wrote:

Magnus,

Echoing Naoto's comments I don't agree that we should be supporting this. In 
the original email a workaround was mentioned using an environment variable - 
if that is the case then I don't think we need to do anything here. Even if 
not, who knows how many other languages we might have to support in this way.


I didn't think a simple patch would generate so much discussion. :-)

I'm just about this close --| |-- to dropping this but let me just elaborate 
on a few points here:
1) The fix was indeed intended to be language independet; the comment about 
Frech was unfortunate and should be rewritten.


2) The workaround mentioned was for JDK7. No such workaround is possible for 
JDK8, and we will fail at configure time.


3) I think English should be the supported locale; unfortunately on Windows 
platforms changing locale is system-wide and thus not possible to change for 
only JDK build tools. Building in a virtual machine with English locale to 
work around this is of course possible, but that will make a slow build even 
slower.


4) At the very least, a simple fix that don't get configure artificially 
caught when trying to check if the tools is okay, when it actually is, would 
be okay.



New webrev fixing the comment: 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8025933-configure-support-french-cl.exe/webrev.02


If anyone still objects to this, let me known and I'll drop it.
You must change in your patch the ' ' character following ersion by a dot '.' 
because in fact the character is X'FF' which is not displayable and replaced by 
a space.


h: 43 6F 6D 70 69 6C 61 74 65 75 72 20 64 27 6F 70 ; Compilateur d'op
0010h: 74 69 6D 69 73 61 74 69 6F 6E 20 4D 69 63 72 6F ; timisation Micro
0020h: 73 6F 66 74 20 28 52 29 20 33 32 FF 62 69 74 73 ; soft (R) 32ÿbits
0030h: 20 43 2F 43 2B 2B 20 76 65 72 73 69 6F 6E FF 31 ;  C/C++ versionÿ1
0040h: 36 2E 30 30 2E 33 30 33 31 39 2E 30 31 20 70 6F ; 6.00.30319.01 po
0050h: 75 72 20 38 30 78 38 36 0A  ; ur 80x86.

By the way, I would prefer a fix like in the hotspot JDK7u with a user settable 
variable like ALT_MSVC_COMPILER_VERSION and ALT_MSVC_LINK_VERSION. If those 
variables are not defined, then use the make script. There are so many ALT_ 
variables to customize the build that it make sense to use ALT variables also in 
that case.


But you decide, it is just my pratical preference.

Francis


/Magnus





RFR: Bug ID: 9007227: - make/sanity-rules.gmk:61: *** multiple target patterns. Stop

2013-10-06 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi

I submit this patch for review for this Bug ID: 9007227: - 
make/sanity-rules.gmk:61: *** multiple target patterns.  Stop


The webrev.ksh is broken on WXP/Cygwin. So I am providing here the hg outgoing 
report as well as the new file README-Windows-Cygwin-VS2010


Francis


$ hg outgoing -v
comparing with http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev
searching for changes
changeset:   723:ca9d79ba85a6
tag: tip
user:fandre francis.andre.kampb...@orange.fr
date:Sun Oct 06 19:11:23 2013 +0100
files:   README-Windows-Cygwin-VS2010
description:
Bug ID: 9007227: - make/sanity-rules.gmk:61: *** multiple target patterns.  Stop

The multiple target patterns error is coming from the version of GNU make.exe in 
the Cygwin distribu

tion that does not recognize drive letter in path.
The solution is to fully explained in a blog of Volker SIMONIS which is printed 
in this new file. *N

o one* will succeed to build the OpenJDK on windows
with cygwin and VS2010 without following the Volker's paper. That's why IMO, it 
is mandatory to join

 this README-Windows-Cygwin-VS2010 in the distribution.
YAOJOWBI - Yet another OpenJDK on Windows Build Instruction
By simonis
Created 2011-10-28 11:00
Posted by simonis [1] on October 28, 2011 at 11:00 AM PDT

Printed from 
https://weblogs.java.net/blog/simonis/archive/2011/10/28/yaojowbi-yet-another-openjdk-windows-build-instruction?force=510

This blog describes how to build both, a 64-bit and a 32-bit version of OpenJDK 
8 on a plain, vanilla WindowsXP 64-bit operating system using only free (as in 
free beer) tools.

Contents
Getting started
VisualC++ Express
Windows SDK
DirectX SDK
TortoiseHg
Java 7 JDK
Ant
Cygwin
GNU make
FreeType
PATH handling
OpenJDK sources
JAXP and JAX_WS
msvcr100.dll
Building

There are several tutorials out there which explain in more or less detail how 
to build OpenJDK on Windows. The problem with most of them is that they are 
either outdated (will happen with this blog as well:) or they use compilers 
which either aren't available anymore or which are not free. This blog will 
describe how to build both, a 64-bit and a 32-bit version of OpenJDK 8 on a 
plain, vanilla WindowsXP 64-bit operating system using only free (as in free 
beer) tools.

Unfortunately, building OpenJDK on Windows is still far away from being 
straightforward as can be seen from the regular desperate help requests on the 
OpenJDK mailing lists. This has many reasons and I neither want to discuss them 
nor do I want to blame anybody for this fact. Instead I hope this post can help 
to improve the OpenJDK build documentation [2] and perhaps even the build 
process itself.

Getting started

As stated above, I started with a fresh, 64-bit WindowsXP installation. In fact 
I used a VmWare-Image in Oracle VirtualBox 4.1.4 on 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04 and in 
the VmWare Player 3.1.4 on 64-bit Windows 7. The first step was to install the 
free Microsoft C/C++ compilers and various dependencies required by OpenJDK. If 
not mentioned otherwise, I've installed all the packages mentioned here in the 
default location that was suggested by the respective installers.

VisualC++ 2010 Express

Download and install the free VisualC++ 2010 Express compilers from: 
http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/products/2010-editions/visual-cpp-express
 [3]. Notice that this will require the installation of the Windows Imaging 
Component (64-bit) which is not present in a clean XP installation, but the 
VisualC++ installer will point you to the right URL from where you can get it 
(just for any case, here's where I finally downloaded it from: 
http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=enid=1385 [4]).

Windows SDK for Windows 7 and .Net

Unfortunately, the VisualC++ 2010 Express package only contains 32-bit 
compilers. So if we want to build a 64-bit JVM we have to additionally install 
the Windows SDK for Windows 7 and .Net from 
http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=8279 [5]. (Notice that the 
Windows SDK now also contains the Itanium cross compiler. So should there be a 
native IA64 port in the OpenJDK anytime soon, it will be possible to build it 
with this setup as well:)

Microsoft DirectX 9.0 SDK

Another build requirement is the Microsoft DirectX 9.0 SDK header files and 
libraries. It can be easily installed from 
http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=enid=21416 [6] 
but be sure to check the corresponding Microsoft DirectX [7] section in the 
OpenJDK Readme [2] in the case the required version changed.

TortoiseHg

To get the OpenJDK source code, we need a Mercurial [8] client. TortoiseHg [9] 
is an easy to install Mercurial distribution for Windows which can be 
downloaded from http://tortoisehg.bitbucket.org/download [10]. The installation 
step will updated the system path automatically.

7u40 on WXP/Cygwin: webrev: Is there a java or ant version of webrev?

2013-10-05 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi Builders

I am really fighting against the triumvira (Cygwin, ksh, webrev.ksh) because of 
a bug in the cd command of the korn shell under cygwin -- log  below --. The cd 
command prepends the target directory where to go by the current $PWD.


cd Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/make/windows/makefiles becomes
cd 
/cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/make/windows/makefiles


and for sure, the translated directory does not exist.

So, it is clear that's not a problem with webrev.ksh but I am stacked with and I 
have no idea when this problem will be fixed in the Cygwin tool.  Thus I am 
wondering if there is a java or ant version of webrev because I am not able to 
fix this issue in a 3000+ lines of ksh while that's not a problem in java or ant.


Francis

$ ksh ./make/scripts/webrev.ksh -v
./make/scripts/webrev.ksh version: 23.18-hg+jbs
   SCM detected: mercurial
  Workspace: Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot
Compare against: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/hotspot
  Output to: Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/webrev
   Output Files:
./make/scripts/webrev.ksh[2899]: cd: 
/cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/make/windows/makefiles: 
No such file or directory
abort: cannot follow file not in parent revision: sa.make 
make/windows/makefiles/sa.make
./make/scripts/webrev.ksh[2899]: cd: 
/cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/make/windows/makefiles: 
No such file or directory

*** Error: file not in parent or child


Re: RFR (S): JDK-8025933 Configure should support French cl.exe

2013-10-04 Thread Francis ANDRE
Changing the LANG to C or en_US does not work neither. The VS C++ compiler does 
not use the LANG variable for providing messages. I know that on WXP, there are 
options to setup the language of work like English but I cannot turn my PC to 
English because others tools like Excel will work in English with the decimal 
point as '.' instead of the ',' for France... The setup of the language for WS 
Studio is just the one you choose at download time -- much like the JDK of Sun 
for Japanese or Chinese --; The point here is that I succeed in downloading the 
ENU VS2010 version but after the installation, it is the French version that 
runs


Anyhow, I think that for this specific case of VS C++ which is not a compiler 
that follows the Linux/Cygwin rules --ie LANG=en_US, one should provide a way to 
support non en_US VS C++ compiler for computing the vervion used.


Francis
Le 04/10/2013 19:16, Naoto Sato a écrit :
The issue here (and the reason why the rule is to run build in en_US) is that 
the build would be error prone if we allow running builds in locales other 
than US English. In the past, we had several build errors related to this, 
e.g., 'date' command produced differently formatted date string for each 
locale which resulted in build errors.


Naoto

On 10/4/13 9:42 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
I agree that the general rule is to build in an English environment. 
Unfortunately, on Windows, it is not as trivial, nor often possible to get 
tools to produce different output by setting a locale. It is not the case 
with cl.exe, anyway. And in this case, Microsoft apparently does not provide 
the English version to French users. Hence this fix.


/Magnus

4 okt 2013 kl. 18:18 skrev Naoto Sato naoto.s...@oracle.com:


Hi Magnus,

Well, it would work for Latin languages, but not for others, e.g., CJK. I 
thought that the general rule was to run the build in English environment. I 
would think that French CL.EXE would produce English version string on 
Windows configured for en_US locale.


Naoto

On 10/4/13 6:12 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025933

In France, it's not possible to download the English version of Visual
Studio; hence CL.EXE presents itself as:
Compilateur d'optimisation Microsoft (R) 32 bits C/C++ version
16.00.30319.01 pour 80x86
instead of
Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 16.00.30319.01
for 80x86

With a simple fix we can handle this in configure as well.

WebRev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8025933-configure-support-french-cl.exe/webrev.01 




/Magnus









JDK7u40: webrev does not seem to work properly on WXP/Cygwin

2013-10-04 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi

I am trying to build a webrev for an outgoing patch on a WXP/x86/Cygwin 
platform, but it seems that the webrev script is not handling properly the 
/cygdrive/ path. So, I am wondering if there a specific configuration guide for 
using this script under cygwin?


Francis

FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot
$ ksh ./make/scripts/webrev.ksh make/windows/makefiles/sa.make
   SCM detected: mercurial
 File list from: make/windows/makefiles/sa.make
  Workspace: Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot
Compare against: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/hotspot
  Output to: Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/webrev
   Output Files:
./make/scripts/webrev.ksh[2895]: cd: 
/cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspo

t: No such file or directory
abort: cannot follow file not in parent revision: checkAndBuildSA::
checkAndBuildSA::
./make/scripts/webrev.ksh[2895]: cd: 
/cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/Z:/DEV/Ope

nJDK_7u40/hotspot: No such file or directory
*** Error: file not in parent or child


JDK7u40: build issue with a french VS2010 Express

2013-10-03 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi

In the 7u40/jdk/make/common/shared/Compiler-msvc.gmk, the code for computing the 
CC_VER does work with a French VS2010 Express compiler


CC_VER  := $(shell $(CC) 21 | $(HEAD) -n 1 | $(SED) 's/.*\(Version.*\)/\1/' | 
$(NAWK) '{print $$2}')


because the cl command returns

Compilateur d'optimisation Microsoft (R) 32 bits C/C++ version 16.00.30319.01 
pour 80x86

Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. Tous droits réservés.

utilisation : cl [ option... ] nom de fichier... [ /link linkoption... ]

So, soneone from the build team  would say: Hey guy, pick up the English version 
and it will work!. But that does not work neither because when one download 
VS2010 Express from a French territory, one gets the French version EVEN if the 
English version was explicitly requested (I made it twice, thinking I missed to 
select the English version).



The problem has already been solved in the hotspot build by using the externals 
variables FORCE_MSC_VER and FORCE_LINK_VERSION in this file 
/hotspot/make/windows/get_msc_ver.sh


I can build a fix for this issue but I think it is better than someone from the 
build team fix this issue because of the overall responsibility of making the 
build correct on the WXP/VS2010 as well as others platforms which I do not have.


Francis


Re: JDK-7082220 : Visual Studio projects broken after change: backport to OpenJDK7/hotspot

2013-09-23 Thread Francis ANDRE

Sean

The point is that OpenJDK7u is not open source while OpenJDK7 is... Following is 
a snippet of the make log joined...
That's the same story for the HSX project. Thus either the OpenJDK7u is an open 
source project and then the makefiles are wrong, either it is not and then I 
need the backport on the OpenJDK7 project.


Regards

Francis


mv  ad_x86_32.cpp  ad_x86_32.hpp  ad_x86_32_clone.cpp 
ad_x86_32_expand.cpp  ad_x86_32_forma
t.cpp  ad_x86_32_gen.cpp  ad_x86_32_misc.cpp ad_x86_32_peephole.cpp  
ad_x86_32_pipeline.cpp  adGlob

als_x86_32.hpp  dfa_x86_32.cpp adfiles/
C:\Progra~1\Java\jdk1.6.0_35\bin\javac -g -encoding ascii -source 6 
-target 6 -d jvmtifile

s Z:\DEV\OpenJDK7u\hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiGen.java
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnv.hpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnter.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnterTrace.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnvRecommended.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/bytecodeInterpreterWithChecks.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmti.h
*NMAKE : fatal error U1073: incapable d'obtenir 
'Z:\DEV\OpenJDK7u\hotspot/src/closed/share/vm/trace/t**

**raceEventClasses.xsl'*
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cd' : code retour '0x2'
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\BIN\nmake.EXE' : code

 retour '0x2'
Stop.
Makefile:191: recipe for target `generic_build2' failed
make[1]: *** [generic_build2] Error 2
make[1] : on quitte le répertoire « /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/make »
Makefile:151: recipe for target `jvmg' failed
make: *** [jvmg] Error 2

FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/make
Le 22/09/2013 20:40, Seán Coffey a écrit :

Francis,

the OpenJDK 7 repository corresponds to the JDK 7 GA release made a few years 
ago. The OpenJDK 7u repository is used to gather fixes for the JDK 7 update 
releases.


Isn't this patch already in the updates ? (7u2)

http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot/rev/2f27ed2a98fa
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-2213981

regards,
Sean.

On 22/09/2013 09:37, Francis ANDRE wrote:

HI

the patch JDK-7082220 : Visual Studio projects broken after change 7016797: 
Hotspot: securely/restrictive load dlls  is missing in the 
OpenJDK7/hotspot/src/share/tools/ProjectCreator/WinGammaPlatformVC10.java. I 
applied it localy but some other OpenJDK developpers on WXP/VS2010 would 
benefit of this patch if it was applied to the OpenJDK7 forest. So I am 
wondering how to request a backport of this patch to the OpenJDK7/hotspot 
repository?


Regards

FA







cd /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/make; \
make BUILD_FLAVOR=jvmg VM_TARGET=jvmg generic_build2 
INFO: ENABLE_FULL_DEBUG_SYMBOLS=1
make[1] : on entre dans le répertoire « 
/cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/make »
mkdir -p /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/build/windows
cd /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/build/windows; \
MAKEFLAGS= MFLAGS= EXTRA_CFLAGS= nmake -NOLOGO -f 
Z:/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/make/windows/build.make \
  Variant=compiler2 \
  WorkSpace=Z:\\DEV\\OpenJDK7u\\hotspot \
  BootStrapDir=C:\\Progra~1\\Java\\jdk1.6.0_35 \
  BuildUser=FrancisANDRE \
   ARCH=x86 BUILDARCH=i486 Platform_arch=x86 
Platform_arch_model=x86_32 ENABLE_FULL_DEBUG_SYMBOLS=1 ZIP_DEBUGINFO_FILES=1 
RM=rm -f ZIPEXE=zip JDK_MKTG_VERSION=7.0 JDK_MAJOR_VER=1 JDK_MINOR_VER=7 
JDK_MICRO_VER=0 BUILD_WIN_SA=1 JAVA_HOME=C:\\Progra~1\\Java\\jdk1.6.0_35 
OUTPUTDIR=Z:\\DEV\\OpenJDK7u\\hotspot\\build\\windows 
GAMMADIR=Z:\\DEV\\OpenJDK7u\\hotspot MAKE_VERBOSE=y 
HOTSPOT_RELEASE_VERSION=24.0-b56 JRE_RELEASE_VERSION=1.7.0 
HOTSPOT_BUILD_VERSION=internal INCLUDE_TRACE=1 jvmg


cd windows_i486_compiler2
nmake -nologo -f 
Z:\DEV\OpenJDK7u\hotspot\make\windows\makefiles\top.make BUILD_FLAVOR=debug 
ARCH=x86
nmake in ./generated
cd generated  C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\BIN\nmake.EXE -NOLOGO -f 
Z:\DEV\OpenJDK7u\hotspot\make\windows\makefiles\generated.make  DIR=.\generated 
BUILD_FLAVOR=debug
NMAKE : fatal error U1073: incapable d'obtenir 
'Z:\DEV\OpenJDK7u\hotspot/src/closed/share/vm/trace/traceEventClasses.xsl'
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cd' : code retour '0x2'
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\BIN\nmake.EXE' : code retour '0x2'
Stop.
Makefile:191: recipe for target `generic_build2' failed
make[1]: *** [generic_build2] Error 2
make[1] : on quitte le répertoire « /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/make »
Makefile:151: recipe for target `jvmg' failed
make: *** [jvmg] Error 2


Re: JDK-7082220 : Visual Studio projects broken after change: backport to OpenJDK7/hotspot

2013-09-23 Thread Francis ANDRE


Le 23/09/2013 18:54, Erik Joelsson a écrit :
It's certainly not supposed to fail like that. I'm not able to reproduce this 
problem cloning from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev. From where 
did you get your sources?
From http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot with hg clone 
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot


the Source Code Mercurial 7u (on the left panel) links  to this 
repository:http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u. So, I take it as the 
repository  base for getting hotspot.


/Erik

On 2013-09-23 17:51, Francis ANDRE wrote:

Sean

The point is that OpenJDK7u is not open source while OpenJDK7 is... Following 
is a snippet of the make log joined...
That's the same story for the HSX project. Thus either the OpenJDK7u is an 
open source project and then the makefiles are wrong, either it is not and 
then I need the backport on the OpenJDK7 project.


Regards

Francis


mv  ad_x86_32.cpp  ad_x86_32.hpp  ad_x86_32_clone.cpp 
ad_x86_32_expand.cpp  ad_x86_32_forma
t.cpp  ad_x86_32_gen.cpp  ad_x86_32_misc.cpp ad_x86_32_peephole.cpp  
ad_x86_32_pipeline.cpp  adGlob

als_x86_32.hpp  dfa_x86_32.cpp adfiles/
C:\Progra~1\Java\jdk1.6.0_35\bin\javac -g -encoding ascii -source 6 
-target 6 -d jvmtifile

s Z:\DEV\OpenJDK7u\hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiGen.java
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnv.hpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnter.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnterTrace.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnvRecommended.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/bytecodeInterpreterWithChecks.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmti.h
*NMAKE : fatal error U1073: incapable d'obtenir 
'Z:\DEV\OpenJDK7u\hotspot/src/closed/share/vm/trace/t**

**raceEventClasses.xsl'*
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cd' : code retour '0x2'
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\BIN\nmake.EXE' : code

 retour '0x2'
Stop.
Makefile:191: recipe for target `generic_build2' failed
make[1]: *** [generic_build2] Error 2
make[1] : on quitte le répertoire « /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/make »
Makefile:151: recipe for target `jvmg' failed
make: *** [jvmg] Error 2

FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/make
Le 22/09/2013 20:40, Seán Coffey a écrit :

Francis,

the OpenJDK 7 repository corresponds to the JDK 7 GA release made a few 
years ago. The OpenJDK 7u repository is used to gather fixes for the JDK 7 
update releases.


Isn't this patch already in the updates ? (7u2)

http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot/rev/2f27ed2a98fa
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-2213981

regards,
Sean.

On 22/09/2013 09:37, Francis ANDRE wrote:

HI

the patch JDK-7082220 : Visual Studio projects broken after change 
7016797: Hotspot: securely/restrictive load dlls  is missing in the 
OpenJDK7/hotspot/src/share/tools/ProjectCreator/WinGammaPlatformVC10.java. 
I applied it localy but some other OpenJDK developpers on WXP/VS2010 would 
benefit of this patch if it was applied to the OpenJDK7 forest. So I am 
wondering how to request a backport of this patch to the OpenJDK7/hotspot 
repository?


Regards

FA














Re: JDK-7082220 : Visual Studio projects broken after change: backport to OpenJDK7/hotspot

2013-09-23 Thread Francis ANDRE

Erik

I got the same error with this repository: hg clone 
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/hotspot


$ pwd
/cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u
hg clone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/hotspot
cd hotspot/make
make all_debug
...
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnter.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnterTrace.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnvRecommended.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/bytecodeInterpreterWithChecks.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmti.h
NMAKE : fatal error U1073: incapable d'obtenir 
'Z:\DEV\OpenJDK7u\hotspot/src/closed/share/vm/trace/t

raceEventClasses.xsl'
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cd' : code retour '0x2'
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\BIN\nmake.EXE' : code

 retour '0x2'
Stop.
Makefile:191: recipe for target `generic_build2' failed
make[1]: *** [generic_build2] Error 2
make[1] : on quitte le répertoire « /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/make »
Makefile:151: recipe for target `jvmg' failed
make: *** [jvmg] Error 2




Le 23/09/2013 18:54, Erik Joelsson a écrit :
It's certainly not supposed to fail like that. I'm not able to reproduce this 
problem cloning from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev. From where 
did you get your sources?


/Erik

On 2013-09-23 17:51, Francis ANDRE wrote:

Sean

The point is that OpenJDK7u is not open source while OpenJDK7 is... Following 
is a snippet of the make log joined...
That's the same story for the HSX project. Thus either the OpenJDK7u is an 
open source project and then the makefiles are wrong, either it is not and 
then I need the backport on the OpenJDK7 project.


Regards

Francis


mv  ad_x86_32.cpp  ad_x86_32.hpp  ad_x86_32_clone.cpp 
ad_x86_32_expand.cpp  ad_x86_32_forma
t.cpp  ad_x86_32_gen.cpp  ad_x86_32_misc.cpp ad_x86_32_peephole.cpp  
ad_x86_32_pipeline.cpp  adGlob

als_x86_32.hpp  dfa_x86_32.cpp adfiles/
C:\Progra~1\Java\jdk1.6.0_35\bin\javac -g -encoding ascii -source 6 
-target 6 -d jvmtifile

s Z:\DEV\OpenJDK7u\hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiGen.java
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnv.hpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnter.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnterTrace.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnvRecommended.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/bytecodeInterpreterWithChecks.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmti.h
*NMAKE : fatal error U1073: incapable d'obtenir 
'Z:\DEV\OpenJDK7u\hotspot/src/closed/share/vm/trace/t**

**raceEventClasses.xsl'*
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cd' : code retour '0x2'
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\BIN\nmake.EXE' : code

 retour '0x2'
Stop.
Makefile:191: recipe for target `generic_build2' failed
make[1]: *** [generic_build2] Error 2
make[1] : on quitte le répertoire « /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/make »
Makefile:151: recipe for target `jvmg' failed
make: *** [jvmg] Error 2

FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/make
Le 22/09/2013 20:40, Seán Coffey a écrit :

Francis,

the OpenJDK 7 repository corresponds to the JDK 7 GA release made a few 
years ago. The OpenJDK 7u repository is used to gather fixes for the JDK 7 
update releases.


Isn't this patch already in the updates ? (7u2)

http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot/rev/2f27ed2a98fa
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-2213981

regards,
Sean.

On 22/09/2013 09:37, Francis ANDRE wrote:

HI

the patch JDK-7082220 : Visual Studio projects broken after change 
7016797: Hotspot: securely/restrictive load dlls  is missing in the 
OpenJDK7/hotspot/src/share/tools/ProjectCreator/WinGammaPlatformVC10.java. 
I applied it localy but some other OpenJDK developpers on WXP/VS2010 would 
benefit of this patch if it was applied to the OpenJDK7 forest. So I am 
wondering how to request a backport of this patch to the OpenJDK7/hotspot 
repository?


Regards

FA














Re: [SPAM]Re: JDK-7082220 : Visual Studio projects broken after change: backport to OpenJDK7/hotspot

2013-09-23 Thread Francis ANDRE
:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.5;C:\Pro
gram Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\LIB
LOGONSERVER=\\IDEFIX
MANPATH=/usr/local/man:/usr/share/man:/usr/man:
MAVEN_HOME=C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\apache-maven-3.0.3
MAVEN_OPTS=-XX:MaxPermSize=128m -Xmx1024m
MQ_FILE_PATH=C:\Program Files\IBM\WebSphere MQ
MQ_JAVA_DATA_PATH=C:\Program Files\IBM\WebSphere MQ
MQ_JAVA_INSTALL_PATH=C:\Program Files\IBM\WebSphere MQ\Java
MQ_JAVA_LIB_PATH=C:\Program Files\IBM\WebSphere MQ\Java\lib
MQ_JRE_PATH=C:\Program Files\IBM\WebSphere MQ\java\jre
MQFT_JAVA_LIB_PATH=C:\Program Files\IBM\WebSphere MQ\java\jre\lib
MQFT_JRE_BIN_PATH=C:\Program Files\IBM\WebSphere MQ\java\jre\bin
NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS=4
OLDPWD=/cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u
OpenJDK=Z:\DEV\OpenJDK7
OS=Windows_NT
PATH=%JAVA_HOME%/bin:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/IBM/WebSphere 
MQ/Java/lib:/cygdrive/c/PVSW/Bin:/cygdr
ive/c/Program Files/IBM/CICS Transaction 
Gateway/bin:/cygdrive/c/zOS/Hercules/bin:/cygdrive/z/isode-
8.0/com.pac.osi.cpp/bin:/cygdrive/z/DEV/3rd/poco/bin:/cygdrive/c/Program 
Files/Perl/bin:/cygdrive/c/
WINDOWS/system32:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/System32/Wbem:/cygdrive/c/Program 
Files/Hum
mingbird/Connectivity/7.00/Accessories:/cygdrive/c/Program 
Files/doxygen/bin:/cygdrive/c/PROGRA~1/AT
T/Graphviz/bin:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/IDM Computer 
Solutions/UltraEdit-32:/cygdrive/c/PROGRA~1/IB

M/SQLLIB/BIN:/cygdrive/c/PROGRA~1/IBM/SQLLIB/FUNCTION:/cygdrive/c/PROGRA~1/IBM/SQLLIB/SAMPLES/REPL:/
cygdrive/c/Program Files/IBM/Installation 
Manager/eclipse/lib:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Subversion/b
in:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Graphviz/Bin:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Fichiers 
communs/DivX Shared:/cy
gdrive/c/Program Files/IBM/WebSphere MQ/bin:/cygdrive/c/Program 
Files/IBM/WebSphere MQ/tools/c/sampl
es/bin:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Mercurial:/cygdrive/c/Program 
Files/TortoiseSVN/bin:/cygdrive/c/Pro
gram Files/Fichiers 
communs/Acronis/SnapAPI:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32/WindowsPowerShell/v1.0:/cyg
drive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SQL Server/100/Tools/Binn:/cygdrive/c/Program 
Files/Microsoft SQL Se
rver/100/DTS/Binn:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/scala/bin:/cygdrive/c/Program 
Files/QuickTime/QTSystem:/
cygdrive/c/Program Files/Mercurial:/cygdrive/c/Program 
Files/TortoiseHg:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Mi
crosoft Visual Studio 10.0/Common7/IDE:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft 
Visual Studio 10.0/VC/BIN
:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0/Common7/Tools:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/Microsoft.
NET/Framework/v4.0.30319:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v3.5:/cygdrive/c/Program 
Files/
Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0/VC/VCPackages:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/HTML Help 
Workshop:/cygdrive/c/
Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0A/bin/NETFX 4.0 
Tools:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft S
DKs/Windows/v7.0A/bin:/cygdrive/c/mingw/bin:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Apache 
Software Foundation/apa
che-ant-1.8.4/bin:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Apache Software 
Foundation/apache-maven-3.0.3/bin:/cygdr

ive/c/Program Files/PostgresPlus/8.4SS/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin
PATHEXT=.COM;.EXE;.BAT;.CMD;.VBS;.VBE;.JS;.JSE;.WSF;.WSH;.PSC1
POCO_BASE=Z:\DEV\3rd\poco
PRINTER=Dell Photo AIO Printer 962
PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE=x86
PROCESSOR_IDENTIFIER=x86 Family 6 Model 30 Stepping 5, GenuineIntel
PROCESSOR_LEVEL=6
PROCESSOR_REVISION=1e05
PROGRAMFILES=C:\Program Files
PROMPT=$P$G
PS1=\[\e]0;\w\a\]\n\[\e[32m\]\u@\h \[\e[33m\]\w\[\e[0m\]\n\$
PWD=/cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/make
QTJAVA=C:\Program Files\Java\jre6\lib\ext\QTJava.zip
SESSIONNAME=Console
SHELL=/bin/bash
SHLVL=1
SOURCE_CODE=/cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7
SYSTEMDRIVE=C:
SYSTEMROOT=C:\WINDOWS
TEMP=/tmp
temp=C:\DOCUME~1\FRANCI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp
TERM=cygwin
TMP=/tmp
tmp=C:\DOCUME~1\FRANCI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp
TZ=Europe/Paris
USER=FrancisANDRE
USERDOMAIN=IDEFIX
USERNAME=FrancisANDRE
USERPROFILE=C:\Documents and Settings\FrancisANDRE
VS100COMNTOOLS=C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\Common7\Tools\
VS71COMNTOOLS=C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003\Common7\Tools\
WINDIR=C:\WINDOWS
XCALIA_CORE_HOME=C:\XCalia\5.2.0


Le 23/09/2013 19:46, Seán Coffey a écrit :
I don't see the failure either. Ran an OpenJDK test job through JPRT.  I 
wonder if make version and/or shell env could have an impact ? Can you share 
more details Francis ?


I see an OPENJDK condition expression in trace.make and wonder if that's being 
parsed incorrectly for this issue ?


http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/hotspot/file/tip/make/windows/makefiles/trace.make

regards,
Sean.

On 23/09/13 17:54, Erik Joelsson wrote:
It's certainly not supposed to fail like that. I'm not able to reproduce this 
problem cloning from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev. From where 
did you get your sources?


/Erik

On 2013-09-23 17:51, Francis ANDRE wrote:

Sean

The point is that OpenJDK7u is not open source while OpenJDK7 is... 
Following is a snippet of the make log joined...
That's the same story for the HSX project. Thus

Re: [SPAM]Re: JDK-7082220 : Visual Studio projects broken after change: backport to OpenJDK7/hotspot

2013-09-23 Thread Francis ANDRE

Sean

OK, I found the problem: I had in the Windows environement variables a variable 
named OpenJDK, which under nmake/make gets translated into OPENJDK under cygwin, 
but echo $OpenJDK prints the value while echo $OPENJDK prints nothing!


Sorry for the noise and thanks for your attention on my problem May be it 
would be interesting to add a check on the value of OPENJDK somewhere to avoid 
such mistake.


Francis

Le 23/09/2013 19:46, Seán Coffey a écrit :
I don't see the failure either. Ran an OpenJDK test job through JPRT.  I 
wonder if make version and/or shell env could have an impact ? Can you share 
more details Francis ?


I see an OPENJDK condition expression in trace.make and wonder if that's being 
parsed incorrectly for this issue ?


http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/hotspot/file/tip/make/windows/makefiles/trace.make

regards,
Sean.

On 23/09/13 17:54, Erik Joelsson wrote:
It's certainly not supposed to fail like that. I'm not able to reproduce this 
problem cloning from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev. From where 
did you get your sources?


/Erik

On 2013-09-23 17:51, Francis ANDRE wrote:

Sean

The point is that OpenJDK7u is not open source while OpenJDK7 is... 
Following is a snippet of the make log joined...
That's the same story for the HSX project. Thus either the OpenJDK7u is an 
open source project and then the makefiles are wrong, either it is not and 
then I need the backport on the OpenJDK7 project.


Regards

Francis


mv  ad_x86_32.cpp  ad_x86_32.hpp  ad_x86_32_clone.cpp 
ad_x86_32_expand.cpp  ad_x86_32_forma
t.cpp  ad_x86_32_gen.cpp  ad_x86_32_misc.cpp ad_x86_32_peephole.cpp  
ad_x86_32_pipeline.cpp  adGlob

als_x86_32.hpp  dfa_x86_32.cpp adfiles/
C:\Progra~1\Java\jdk1.6.0_35\bin\javac -g -encoding ascii -source 
6 -target 6 -d jvmtifile

s Z:\DEV\OpenJDK7u\hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiGen.java
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnv.hpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnter.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnterTrace.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmtiEnvRecommended.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/bytecodeInterpreterWithChecks.cpp
Generating jvmtifiles/jvmti.h
*NMAKE : fatal error U1073: incapable d'obtenir 
'Z:\DEV\OpenJDK7u\hotspot/src/closed/share/vm/trace/t**

**raceEventClasses.xsl'*
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cd' : code retour '0x2'
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\BIN\nmake.EXE' : code

 retour '0x2'
Stop.
Makefile:191: recipe for target `generic_build2' failed
make[1]: *** [generic_build2] Error 2
make[1] : on quitte le répertoire « /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/make »
Makefile:151: recipe for target `jvmg' failed
make: *** [jvmg] Error 2

FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK7u/hotspot/make
Le 22/09/2013 20:40, Seán Coffey a écrit :

Francis,

the OpenJDK 7 repository corresponds to the JDK 7 GA release made a few 
years ago. The OpenJDK 7u repository is used to gather fixes for the JDK 7 
update releases.


Isn't this patch already in the updates ? (7u2)

http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot/rev/2f27ed2a98fa
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-2213981

regards,
Sean.

On 22/09/2013 09:37, Francis ANDRE wrote:

HI

the patch JDK-7082220 : Visual Studio projects broken after change 
7016797: Hotspot: securely/restrictive load dlls  is missing in the 
OpenJDK7/hotspot/src/share/tools/ProjectCreator/WinGammaPlatformVC10.java. 
I applied it localy but some other OpenJDK developpers on WXP/VS2010 would 
benefit of this patch if it was applied to the OpenJDK7 forest. So I am 
wondering how to request a backport of this patch to the OpenJDK7/hotspot 
repository?


Regards

FA















JDK-7082220 : Visual Studio projects broken after change: backport to OpenJDK7/hotspot

2013-09-22 Thread Francis ANDRE

HI

the patch JDK-7082220 : Visual Studio projects broken after change 7016797: 
Hotspot: securely/restrictive load dlls  is missing in the 
OpenJDK7/hotspot/src/share/tools/ProjectCreator/WinGammaPlatformVC10.java. I 
applied it localy but some other OpenJDK developpers on WXP/VS2010 would benefit 
of this patch if it was applied to the OpenJDK7 forest. So I am wondering how to 
request a backport of this patch to the OpenJDK7/hotspot repository?


Regards

FA




Re: JDK 7 build errors on Windows XP

2008-04-11 Thread Francis ANDRE

free.exe belongs to the package procps

 make/sanity-rules.gmk:61: *** multiple target patterns.  Stop.
You should downgrade the make.exe to the 3.80 version as explained in the README

Kelly O'Hair a écrit :

Yes. It is looking for the free command.

It uses free to find the RAM memory size so it can set the java -Xmx memory
setting to an appropriate value based on your machine (javac, jar etc.)

I assume you need to install the cygwin package that includes this command,
but I'm not sure what package that is.
I normally just install all of cygwin.

-kto

PJ Pillai wrote:

Hello,
 
I using build b25 source code from - 
http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7/
 
I setup all the software as per readme html and setup my environment 
variable. When run make sanity, I am getting following error:
 
c:\JDK7\javamake sanity

/bin/sh: free: command not found
make/sanity-rules.gmk:61: *** multiple target patterns.  Stop.
 
Is it looking for free command? I don't see that command in 
c:\cygwin\bin.
 
Please help.
 
Thanks

Pravin





WXP: small build anomaly

2008-04-01 Thread Francis ANDRE

Hi

When building first OpenJDK in product mode and then build it again in debug 
mode, one gets a somewhat confusing anomaly:


Z:\DEV\OpenJDK\builddir /X
 Le volume dans le lecteur Z s'appelle Developpement
 Le numéro de série du volume est A0AB-7CB1

 Répertoire de Z:\DEV\OpenJDK\build

01/04/2008  09:15REP   .
01/04/2008  09:15REP   ..
01/04/2008  09:15REP  WINDOW~1 windows-i586
01/04/2008  09:17REP  WINDOW~2 WINDOW~1-debug
   0 fichier(s)0 octets


IMHO, it would be less confusing to create a 'windows-i586' directory for the 
release mode and a 'windows-i586-debug' directory for the debug mode to get 
something like


01/04/2008  09:15REP  WINDOW~1 windows-i586
01/04/2008  09:17REP  WINDOW~2 windows-i586-debug


Francis