Re: [BVARC] Will This Petition Before The FCC Bring An End To Amateur Radio As We Know It Or Am I Wrong Jim W6LG - YouTube

2023-07-21 Thread M Reiter via BVARC 
in the 70s the music and video industry tried to prevent piracy by
encrypting their music and movies.  they barely got the first CDs out the
door before there was a program free on the internet to crack the
encryption.  the military already encrypts their transmissions.  we are not
allowed to encrypt but everyone else is. I assume that the television
industry wants to protect their copyrights on streaming channels and that
as soon as it is done there will be a crack for it.  definitely not an end
to Ham as we know it.
Marc.


On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 3:57 PM Chris Boone via BVARC 
wrote:

> uhhh NO AMATEUR frequencies are in jeopardy of being grabbed,
> etc..Originally the petitioners wanted 5,10,15,20 and 25 MHz...
>
> SOUND familiar??? Look at the frequencies they propose nownot far off
> WWVnow WWV uses KILOWATTS on their frequenciesdon't cause issues
> with ham operationsIts NOT a ham spectrum grab...
>
> Chris
> WB5ITT
> Trustee, W5APX
>
> On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 05:07:05 PM CDT, Paul Easter via BVARC <
> bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:
>
>
> This has been coming for a long time.  It is already being done.
>
> It does seem like a spectrum grab.  There are plenty of HF frequencies
> they can use without interference to HAM radio.
>
> ARRL will hopefully prove their worth this time.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 3:09 PM Rick Hiller 
> wrote:
>
> Submission Comment  #2   W5RH
> Looking at a bit more detail in Appendix E (Page 74) their study shows
> available frequency ranges within 2 to 25 MHz.   None of their proposed
> bands cover any of our ham bands *EXCEPT 60 Meters, where we have 5
> "channels",* but I think this is shared anyway.
>
> Their 10, 25 and 50 KHz "channailzed space" ranges come up to the band
> edges on a few ham bands NOT JUST 20 MX as has been blogged and youtubed.
> Below I have outlined where their study touches our band edges (always
> skirting our bands except 60 mx).   They claim throughout that they want to
> cause NO Interference to existing services (ham, marine, etc.)
>
> Their study indicates these Frequency bands available 2 to 25 MHz (ref our
> bands)
> *Below Above *
> *3.44.0 80 is 3.5 to 4.0*
> *5.45.0 (within 60 meters 5.3 to 5.4)*
> *7.07.4  40 is 7.0 to 7.3*
> * 9.995 10.1530 is 10.100 to 10.150*
> *14.014.350  20 is 14.0 to 14.350*
> *18.06818.168  17 is 18.068 to 18.168*
> *21.00   21.850 15 is 21.0  to 21.450*
> *24.89   End 12 is 24.890 to 24.990*
>
> Looked up in the license database.   None of the commenting parties is a
> ham except maybe John Madigan (AC0GP -- maybe).
>
> Also, have a look at what they intend to do.  These shortwave HF links are
> to benefit High-Frequency stock trading. (high frequency is not meaning RF
> but the speed of the trade data xfer).   Using shortwave will reduce the
> latency times for the transfer of applicable stock data.  Not using
> satellites or the internet will cut milli seconds off of their transfer
> times.  HFT is a crazy way to trade stocks..  Google HFT  and read on
> Wikipedia.
>
> 73...Rick  W5RH
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 6:43 PM Rick Hiller 
> wrote:
>
> A cursory read through the proposal and attached amendments shows that
> they have done their homework in all aspects.   The various companies have
> been running experiments on air for the past 4 years. (experimental call
> signs are listed)  Seems like they wish to run 20KW to a 10dBi antenna on
> transmit and have a simple vertical whip on the receive end.  They also
> propose interference avoidance and frequency jumping kind of like ALE.
> Freqs used were 4.9, 10.2, 14.9 19.9 and 24.8 with a bandwidth of 10 KHz.
>
> In their initial paragraphs they mention avoidance interference to
> amateur, marine and aeronautical.  No mention of military in there that I
> saw.
>
> Again, this was my 30 minute read of the various sections which means that
> I was looking for pertinent information relating to us hams.   I am
> sure there is more to be found and corrected with a further read.
>
> Just my $.02 for now.73...Rick  W5RH
>
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 5:54 PM JP Pritchard via BVARC 
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply Bill. As Jim Heath points out in this video, the
> deadline for comment is two weeks away. My first thought is, we might
> (emphasis MIGHT) be better off to express our immediate concern to the ARRL
> defense of spectrum lobbyists, in hopes that they could help convey what
> they know to the rest of us (beyond what's in the petition) to give Ham
> World a chance to weigh in. But whatever we do we're already late in the
> process and big money backing this plan already has a big edge on us, if
> there is something here to be worried about.
>
> Any thoughts from others? Time is running out. Let's hear it!
>
> JP
>
> On 07/15/2023 4:55 PM CDT Bill Cordell via BVARC  wrote:
>
>
>
> JP:
>
> We may want to convene a

Re: [BVARC] Will This Petition Before The FCC Bring An End To Amateur Radio As We Know It Or Am I Wrong Jim W6LG - YouTube

2023-07-16 Thread Paul Easter via BVARC 
This has been coming for a long time.  It is already being done.

It does seem like a spectrum grab.  There are plenty of HF frequencies they
can use without interference to HAM radio.

ARRL will hopefully prove their worth this time.



On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 3:09 PM Rick Hiller  wrote:

> Submission Comment  #2   W5RH
> Looking at a bit more detail in Appendix E (Page 74) their study shows
> available frequency ranges within 2 to 25 MHz.   None of their proposed
> bands cover any of our ham bands *EXCEPT 60 Meters, where we have 5
> "channels",* but I think this is shared anyway.
>
> Their 10, 25 and 50 KHz "channailzed space" ranges come up to the band
> edges on a few ham bands NOT JUST 20 MX as has been blogged and youtubed.
> Below I have outlined where their study touches our band edges (always
> skirting our bands except 60 mx).   They claim throughout that they want to
> cause NO Interference to existing services (ham, marine, etc.)
>
> Their study indicates these Frequency bands available 2 to 25 MHz (ref our
> bands)
> *Below Above *
> *3.44.0 80 is 3.5 to 4.0*
> *5.45.0 (within 60 meters 5.3 to 5.4)*
> *7.07.4  40 is 7.0 to 7.3*
> * 9.995 10.1530 is 10.100 to 10.150*
> *14.014.350  20 is 14.0 to 14.350*
> *18.06818.168  17 is 18.068 to 18.168*
> *21.00   21.850 15 is 21.0  to 21.450*
> *24.89   End 12 is 24.890 to 24.990*
>
> Looked up in the license database.   None of the commenting parties is a
> ham except maybe John Madigan (AC0GP -- maybe).
>
> Also, have a look at what they intend to do.  These shortwave HF links are
> to benefit High-Frequency stock trading. (high frequency is not meaning RF
> but the speed of the trade data xfer).   Using shortwave will reduce the
> latency times for the transfer of applicable stock data.  Not using
> satellites or the internet will cut milli seconds off of their transfer
> times.  HFT is a crazy way to trade stocks..  Google HFT  and read on
> Wikipedia.
>
> 73...Rick  W5RH
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 6:43 PM Rick Hiller 
> wrote:
>
>> A cursory read through the proposal and attached amendments shows that
>> they have done their homework in all aspects.   The various companies have
>> been running experiments on air for the past 4 years. (experimental call
>> signs are listed)  Seems like they wish to run 20KW to a 10dBi antenna on
>> transmit and have a simple vertical whip on the receive end.  They also
>> propose interference avoidance and frequency jumping kind of like ALE.
>> Freqs used were 4.9, 10.2, 14.9 19.9 and 24.8 with a bandwidth of 10 KHz.
>>
>> In their initial paragraphs they mention avoidance interference to
>> amateur, marine and aeronautical.  No mention of military in there that I
>> saw.
>>
>> Again, this was my 30 minute read of the various sections which means
>> that I was looking for pertinent information relating to us hams.   I am
>> sure there is more to be found and corrected with a further read.
>>
>> Just my $.02 for now.73...Rick  W5RH
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 5:54 PM JP Pritchard via BVARC 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the reply Bill. As Jim Heath points out in this video, the
>>> deadline for comment is two weeks away. My first thought is, we might
>>> (emphasis MIGHT) be better off to express our immediate concern to the ARRL
>>> defense of spectrum lobbyists, in hopes that they could help convey what
>>> they know to the rest of us (beyond what's in the petition) to give Ham
>>> World a chance to weigh in. But whatever we do we're already late in the
>>> process and big money backing this plan already has a big edge on us, if
>>> there is something here to be worried about.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts from others? Time is running out. Let's hear it!
>>>
>>> JP
>>>
>>> On 07/15/2023 4:55 PM CDT Bill Cordell via BVARC 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> JP:
>>>
>>> We may want to convene a committee of interested people to talk about
>>> what is proposed.  There are so many variables, not to mention the costs to
>>> construct and run a digital transmitter.  Also, who has digital receivers?
>>> Currently there are limited AM shortwave receivers for that industry is
>>> dying (like the majority of the over-the-air broadcast stations due to the
>>> ubiquitous and massively increasing wireless internet)..
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* BVARC  *On Behalf Of *JP Pritchard via
>>> BVARC
>>> *Sent:* Saturday, July 15, 2023 3:47 PM
>>> *To:* BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB 
>>> *Cc:* JP Pritchard 
>>> *Subject:* Re: [BVARC] Will This Petition Before The FCC Bring An End
>>> To Amateur Radio As We Know It Or Am I Wrong Jim W6LG - YouTube
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> How 'bout a couple of our broadcast engineers to respond to this...
>>> Paul, Bill, Chris, Bob?
>>>
>>> On 07/15/2023 3:25 PM CDT K5BOU via BVARC  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeG00x89ATI
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [image:

Re: [BVARC] Will This Petition Before The FCC Bring An End To Amateur Radio As We Know It Or Am I Wrong Jim W6LG - YouTube

2023-07-16 Thread Rick Hiller via BVARC 
Submission Comment  #2   W5RH
Looking at a bit more detail in Appendix E (Page 74) their study shows
available frequency ranges within 2 to 25 MHz.   None of their proposed
bands cover any of our ham bands *EXCEPT 60 Meters, where we have 5
"channels",* but I think this is shared anyway.

Their 10, 25 and 50 KHz "channailzed space" ranges come up to the band
edges on a few ham bands NOT JUST 20 MX as has been blogged and youtubed.
Below I have outlined where their study touches our band edges (always
skirting our bands except 60 mx).   They claim throughout that they want to
cause NO Interference to existing services (ham, marine, etc.)

Their study indicates these Frequency bands available 2 to 25 MHz (ref our
bands)
*Below Above *
*3.44.0 80 is 3.5 to 4.0*
*5.45.0 (within 60 meters 5.3 to 5.4)*
*7.07.4  40 is 7.0 to 7.3*
* 9.995 10.1530 is 10.100 to 10.150*
*14.014.350  20 is 14.0 to 14.350*
*18.06818.168  17 is 18.068 to 18.168*
*21.00   21.850 15 is 21.0  to 21.450*
*24.89   End 12 is 24.890 to 24.990*

Looked up in the license database.   None of the commenting parties is a
ham except maybe John Madigan (AC0GP -- maybe).

Also, have a look at what they intend to do.  These shortwave HF links are
to benefit High-Frequency stock trading. (high frequency is not meaning RF
but the speed of the trade data xfer).   Using shortwave will reduce the
latency times for the transfer of applicable stock data.  Not using
satellites or the internet will cut milli seconds off of their transfer
times.  HFT is a crazy way to trade stocks..  Google HFT  and read on
Wikipedia.

73...Rick  W5RH



On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 6:43 PM Rick Hiller  wrote:

> A cursory read through the proposal and attached amendments shows that
> they have done their homework in all aspects.   The various companies have
> been running experiments on air for the past 4 years. (experimental call
> signs are listed)  Seems like they wish to run 20KW to a 10dBi antenna on
> transmit and have a simple vertical whip on the receive end.  They also
> propose interference avoidance and frequency jumping kind of like ALE.
> Freqs used were 4.9, 10.2, 14.9 19.9 and 24.8 with a bandwidth of 10 KHz.
>
> In their initial paragraphs they mention avoidance interference to
> amateur, marine and aeronautical.  No mention of military in there that I
> saw.
>
> Again, this was my 30 minute read of the various sections which means that
> I was looking for pertinent information relating to us hams.   I am
> sure there is more to be found and corrected with a further read.
>
> Just my $.02 for now.73...Rick  W5RH
>
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 5:54 PM JP Pritchard via BVARC 
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the reply Bill. As Jim Heath points out in this video, the
>> deadline for comment is two weeks away. My first thought is, we might
>> (emphasis MIGHT) be better off to express our immediate concern to the ARRL
>> defense of spectrum lobbyists, in hopes that they could help convey what
>> they know to the rest of us (beyond what's in the petition) to give Ham
>> World a chance to weigh in. But whatever we do we're already late in the
>> process and big money backing this plan already has a big edge on us, if
>> there is something here to be worried about.
>>
>> Any thoughts from others? Time is running out. Let's hear it!
>>
>> JP
>>
>> On 07/15/2023 4:55 PM CDT Bill Cordell via BVARC 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> JP:
>>
>> We may want to convene a committee of interested people to talk about
>> what is proposed.  There are so many variables, not to mention the costs to
>> construct and run a digital transmitter.  Also, who has digital receivers?
>> Currently there are limited AM shortwave receivers for that industry is
>> dying (like the majority of the over-the-air broadcast stations due to the
>> ubiquitous and massively increasing wireless internet)..
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* BVARC  *On Behalf Of *JP Pritchard via
>> BVARC
>> *Sent:* Saturday, July 15, 2023 3:47 PM
>> *To:* BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB 
>> *Cc:* JP Pritchard 
>> *Subject:* Re: [BVARC] Will This Petition Before The FCC Bring An End To
>> Amateur Radio As We Know It Or Am I Wrong Jim W6LG - YouTube
>>
>>
>>
>> How 'bout a couple of our broadcast engineers to respond to this... Paul,
>> Bill, Chris, Bob?
>>
>> On 07/15/2023 3:25 PM CDT K5BOU via BVARC  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeG00x89ATI
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: image001.png]
>>
>> K5BOU-PhilippeBoucaumont
>>
>> Houston*|*Texas*|*USA*|*
>>
>> https://mccrarymeadowsweather.com/
>>
>> [image: image002.png][image: image003.png][image: image004.jpg][image:
>> image005.gif]
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>>
>> BVARC mailing list
>> BVARC@bvarc.org
>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>> Publicly available archives are

Re: [BVARC] Will This Petition Before The FCC Bring An End To Amateur Radio As We Know It Or Am I Wrong Jim W6LG - YouTube

2023-07-15 Thread Rick Hiller via BVARC 
A cursory read through the proposal and attached amendments shows that they
have done their homework in all aspects.   The various companies have been
running experiments on air for the past 4 years. (experimental call signs
are listed)  Seems like they wish to run 20KW to a 10dBi antenna on
transmit and have a simple vertical whip on the receive end.  They also
propose interference avoidance and frequency jumping kind of like ALE.
Freqs used were 4.9, 10.2, 14.9 19.9 and 24.8 with a bandwidth of 10 KHz.

In their initial paragraphs they mention avoidance interference to amateur,
marine and aeronautical.  No mention of military in there that I saw.

Again, this was my 30 minute read of the various sections which means that
I was looking for pertinent information relating to us hams.   I am
sure there is more to be found and corrected with a further read.

Just my $.02 for now.73...Rick  W5RH

On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 5:54 PM JP Pritchard via BVARC 
wrote:

> Thanks for the reply Bill. As Jim Heath points out in this video, the
> deadline for comment is two weeks away. My first thought is, we might
> (emphasis MIGHT) be better off to express our immediate concern to the ARRL
> defense of spectrum lobbyists, in hopes that they could help convey what
> they know to the rest of us (beyond what's in the petition) to give Ham
> World a chance to weigh in. But whatever we do we're already late in the
> process and big money backing this plan already has a big edge on us, if
> there is something here to be worried about.
>
> Any thoughts from others? Time is running out. Let's hear it!
>
> JP
>
> On 07/15/2023 4:55 PM CDT Bill Cordell via BVARC  wrote:
>
>
>
> JP:
>
> We may want to convene a committee of interested people to talk about what
> is proposed.  There are so many variables, not to mention the costs to
> construct and run a digital transmitter.  Also, who has digital receivers?
> Currently there are limited AM shortwave receivers for that industry is
> dying (like the majority of the over-the-air broadcast stations due to the
> ubiquitous and massively increasing wireless internet)..
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> *From:* BVARC  *On Behalf Of *JP Pritchard via
> BVARC
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 15, 2023 3:47 PM
> *To:* BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB 
> *Cc:* JP Pritchard 
> *Subject:* Re: [BVARC] Will This Petition Before The FCC Bring An End To
> Amateur Radio As We Know It Or Am I Wrong Jim W6LG - YouTube
>
>
>
> How 'bout a couple of our broadcast engineers to respond to this... Paul,
> Bill, Chris, Bob?
>
> On 07/15/2023 3:25 PM CDT K5BOU via BVARC  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeG00x89ATI
>
>
>
> [image: image001.png]
>
> K5BOU-PhilippeBoucaumont
>
> Houston*|*Texas*|*USA*|*
>
> https://mccrarymeadowsweather.com/
>
> [image: image002.png][image: image003.png][image: image004.jpg][image:
> image005.gif]
>
>
>
> 
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Publicly available archives are available here:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
>
> 
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Publicly available archives are available here:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
>
> 
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Publicly available archives are available here:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
>


-- 
Rick Hiller
*e-mail: rickhille...@gmail.com *
*Cell:832-474-3713*
*Physical: 9031 Troulon Drive*
*   Houston, TX 77036*

Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/

Re: [BVARC] Will This Petition Before The FCC Bring An End To Amateur Radio As We Know It Or Am I Wrong Jim W6LG - YouTube

2023-07-15 Thread JP Pritchard via BVARC 
Thanks for the reply Bill. As Jim Heath points out in this video, the deadline 
for comment is two weeks away. My first thought is, we might (emphasis MIGHT) 
be better off to express our immediate concern to the ARRL defense of spectrum 
lobbyists, in hopes that they could help convey what they know to the rest of 
us (beyond what's in the petition) to give Ham World a chance to weigh in. But 
whatever we do we're already late in the process and big money backing this 
plan already has a big edge on us, if there is something here to be worried 
about.
 
Any thoughts from others? Time is running out. Let's hear it!
 
JP

> On 07/15/2023 4:55 PM CDT Bill Cordell via BVARC  wrote:
>  
>  
> 
> JP:
> 
> We may want to convene a committee of interested people to talk about what is 
> proposed.  There are so many variables, not to mention the costs to construct 
> and run a digital transmitter.  Also, who has digital receivers?  Currently 
> there are limited AM shortwave receivers for that industry is dying (like the 
> majority of the over-the-air broadcast stations due to the ubiquitous and 
> massively increasing wireless internet)..
> 
> Bill
> 
>  
> 
> From: BVARC  On Behalf Of JP Pritchard via BVARC
> Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2023 3:47 PM
> To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB 
> Cc: JP Pritchard 
> Subject: Re: [BVARC] Will This Petition Before The FCC Bring An End To 
> Amateur Radio As We Know It Or Am I Wrong Jim W6LG - YouTube
> 
>  
> 
> How 'bout a couple of our broadcast engineers to respond to this... Paul, 
> Bill, Chris, Bob?
> 
> > 
> > On 07/15/2023 3:25 PM CDT K5BOU via BVARC  > mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> wrote:
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeG00x89ATI
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > [image001.png]
> > 
> > K5BOU-PhilippeBoucaumont
> > 
> > Houston|Texas|USA|
> > 
> > https://mccrarymeadowsweather.com/
> > 
> > [image002.png][image003.png][image004.jpg][image005.gif]
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
> > 
> > BVARC mailing list
> > BVARC@bvarc.org mailto:BVARC@bvarc.org
> > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> > Publicly available archives are available here: 
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
> > 
> 
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
> 
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Publicly available archives are available here: 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
> 

Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/

Re: [BVARC] Will This Petition Before The FCC Bring An End To Amateur Radio As We Know It Or Am I Wrong Jim W6LG - YouTube

2023-07-15 Thread Bill Cordell via BVARC 
JP:

We may want to convene a committee of interested people to talk about what is 
proposed.  There are so many variables, not to mention the costs to construct 
and run a digital transmitter.  Also, who has digital receivers?  Currently 
there are limited AM shortwave receivers for that industry is dying (like the 
majority of the over-the-air broadcast stations due to the ubiquitous and 
massively increasing wireless internet)..

Bill

 

From: BVARC  On Behalf Of JP Pritchard via BVARC
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2023 3:47 PM
To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB 
Cc: JP Pritchard 
Subject: Re: [BVARC] Will This Petition Before The FCC Bring An End To Amateur 
Radio As We Know It Or Am I Wrong Jim W6LG - YouTube

 

How 'bout a couple of our broadcast engineers to respond to this... Paul, Bill, 
Chris, Bob? 

On 07/15/2023 3:25 PM CDT K5BOU via BVARC mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org> > wrote: 

  

  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeG00x89ATI

 



K5BOU-PhilippeBoucaumont

Houston|Texas|USA|

https://mccrarymeadowsweather.com/



 

 
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club 

BVARC mailing list 
BVARC@bvarc.org   
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org 
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 


Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/

Re: [BVARC] Will This Petition Before The FCC Bring An End To Amateur Radio As We Know It Or Am I Wrong Jim W6LG - YouTube

2023-07-15 Thread Scott Medbury via BVARC 
This is what I was talking about at the general meeting on Tuesday.

73 ... Scott KD5FBA

On Sat, Jul 15, 2023, 3:25 PM K5BOU via BVARC  wrote:

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeG00x89ATI
>
>
>
> [image: image001.png]
>
> K5BOU-PhilippeBoucaumont
>
> Houston*|*Texas*|*USA*|*
>
> https://mccrarymeadowsweather.com/
>
> [image: image002.png][image: image003.png][image: image004.jpg][image:
> image005.gif]
>
>
> 
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
>
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Publicly available archives are available here:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
>

Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/

Re: [BVARC] Will This Petition Before The FCC Bring An End To Amateur Radio As We Know It Or Am I Wrong Jim W6LG - YouTube

2023-07-15 Thread JP Pritchard via BVARC 
How 'bout a couple of our broadcast engineers to respond to this... Paul, Bill, 
Chris, Bob?

> On 07/15/2023 3:25 PM CDT K5BOU via BVARC  wrote:
>  
>  
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeG00x89ATI
> 
> 
>  
> 
> [image001.png]
> 
> K5BOU-PhilippeBoucaumont
> 
> Houston|Texas|USA|
> 
> https://mccrarymeadowsweather.com/
> 
> [image002.png][image003.png][image004.jpg][image005.gif]
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club
> 
> BVARC mailing list
> BVARC@bvarc.org
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Publicly available archives are available here: 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/
> 

Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/