Re: Cake vs other frameworks benchmarks

2011-05-20 Thread Miles J
The automagic is the slow part in my opinion.

On May 19, 1:08 am, Bogdan I. Bursuc bogdanbursu...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Plus there is the features a framework can offer. If a framework has 3 classes
 don't think it helps u that much. But a framework like Cake which has a lot of
 automagic which if you understand is very usefull. Might speed things up.

 --
 Thanks,
 Bogdan Bursuc!







  I also just read the summary:

  Final Advice: There is more to consider than speed when selecting a PHP
  framework; other factors such as security, ease of installation and
  database support have to be examined as well. Other frameworks may be
  slower but have greater and wider community support, in case you have some
  trouble with the framework there are lots of users that could help who
  have working experience with that framework. This is true with CakePHP,
  Symfony and Zend framework, all of which are very popular among PHP
  developers.

  Jeremy Burns
  Class Outfit

  jeremybu...@classoutfit.com
 http://www.classoutfit.com

  On 19 May 2011, at 08:56, Jeremy Burns | Class Outfit wrote:
   Put Michael Schumacher at the wheel of a Skoda and I bet he could beat me
   in Ferarri. Benchmarks are mildy interesting, at best.

   Jeremy Burns
   Class Outfit

   jeremybu...@classoutfit.com
  http://www.classoutfit.com

   On 19 May 2011, at 08:53, Bogdan I. Bursuc wrote:
   I've been using Cake 2.0 since 2.0-dev and I say that we should wait for
   the final release and then see the benchmarks. It's way faster than
   1.3. And with so many new cool features.

   --
   Thanks,
   Bogdan Bursuc!

   On May 19, 7:30 am, mutabor kostya.stepa...@gmail.com wrote:
   Hi guys,

   Lately, I came across another benchmark of popular PHP frameworks:

  http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/7-PHP-Frameworks-Tested-For-Speed/2/

   This is approx. 3rd or 4th benchmark of this type that I came across
   during last couple of month and in every benchmark Cake shows pretty
   poor results.

   As a head of a company that specializes in CakePHP, I am very worried
   about Cake's future. Because even all of these benchmarks are wrong /
   have incorrect results, our customers still trust them and I start
   hearing Anything, but not Cake, please, look at this
   benchmark seems it's not a good piece of software from our
   customers.

   The usual problem with these benchmarks - is they don't set cake up
   correctly in the first place (they use it out of the box; cake ships
   in debug mode, with the session enabled etc.). And correcting that is
   in the hands of the person publishing their results.

   But: How many of your clients use hello world apps?

   Something should be done, even if there is no opportunity to increase
   the speed, I guess Cake should apply some kind of PR actions :)

   The best thing that could be done in your eyes is for someone to
   dedicate a bit of time making cake faster - if only you had a few
   developers you could call upon to do that ... :)

   AD

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php


Re: Cake vs other frameworks benchmarks

2011-05-20 Thread Jamie
Plus the concessions required for PHP 4, such as not being able to
'lazy load' objects (e.g. associated models) on demand.

On May 20, 12:02 am, Miles J mileswjohn...@gmail.com wrote:
 The automagic is the slow part in my opinion.

 On May 19, 1:08 am, Bogdan I. Bursuc bogdanbursu...@gmail.com
 wrote:







  Plus there is the features a framework can offer. If a framework has 3 
  classes
  don't think it helps u that much. But a framework like Cake which has a lot 
  of
  automagic which if you understand is very usefull. Might speed things up.

  --
  Thanks,
  Bogdan Bursuc!

   I also just read the summary:

   Final Advice: There is more to consider than speed when selecting a PHP
   framework; other factors such as security, ease of installation and
   database support have to be examined as well. Other frameworks may be
   slower but have greater and wider community support, in case you have some
   trouble with the framework there are lots of users that could help who
   have working experience with that framework. This is true with CakePHP,
   Symfony and Zend framework, all of which are very popular among PHP
   developers.

   Jeremy Burns
   Class Outfit

   jeremybu...@classoutfit.com
  http://www.classoutfit.com

   On 19 May 2011, at 08:56, Jeremy Burns | Class Outfit wrote:
Put Michael Schumacher at the wheel of a Skoda and I bet he could beat 
me
in Ferarri. Benchmarks are mildy interesting, at best.

Jeremy Burns
Class Outfit

jeremybu...@classoutfit.com
   http://www.classoutfit.com

On 19 May 2011, at 08:53, Bogdan I. Bursuc wrote:
I've been using Cake 2.0 since 2.0-dev and I say that we should wait 
for
the final release and then see the benchmarks. It's way faster than
1.3. And with so many new cool features.

--
Thanks,
Bogdan Bursuc!

On May 19, 7:30 am, mutabor kostya.stepa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,

Lately, I came across another benchmark of popular PHP frameworks:

   http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/7-PHP-Frameworks-Tested-For-Speed/2/

This is approx. 3rd or 4th benchmark of this type that I came across
during last couple of month and in every benchmark Cake shows pretty
poor results.

As a head of a company that specializes in CakePHP, I am very worried
about Cake's future. Because even all of these benchmarks are wrong /
have incorrect results, our customers still trust them and I start
hearing Anything, but not Cake, please, look at this
benchmark seems it's not a good piece of software from our
customers.

The usual problem with these benchmarks - is they don't set cake up
correctly in the first place (they use it out of the box; cake ships
in debug mode, with the session enabled etc.). And correcting that is
in the hands of the person publishing their results.

But: How many of your clients use hello world apps?

Something should be done, even if there is no opportunity to increase
the speed, I guess Cake should apply some kind of PR actions :)

The best thing that could be done in your eyes is for someone to
dedicate a bit of time making cake faster - if only you had a few
developers you could call upon to do that ... :)

AD

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php


Re: Cake vs other frameworks benchmarks

2011-05-20 Thread tPl0ch
Hello,

Concerning the PHP 4 'concessions' Jamie addressed:

http://phpadvent.org/2010/usage-statistics-by-ilia-alshanetsky

In this scenario you even have to add the percentage of PHP 5.1, since
a lot of the other mentioned frameworks require PHP 5.2+.
So it's even a 30% 'market' share, that CakePHP 1.3.x inherits as a in
my oppinion dominant position as a framework for PHP4.
I can remeber that after the move from trac to lighthouse PHP 4
tickets were still filed there every now and then.

On 20 Mai, 19:35, Jamie jamie@gmail.com wrote:
 Plus the concessions required for PHP 4, such as not being able to
 'lazy load' objects (e.g. associated models) on demand.

 On May 20, 12:02 am, Miles J mileswjohn...@gmail.com wrote:







  The automagic is the slow part in my opinion.

  On May 19, 1:08 am, Bogdan I. Bursuc bogdanbursu...@gmail.com
  wrote:

   Plus there is the features a framework can offer. If a framework has 3 
   classes
   don't think it helps u that much. But a framework like Cake which has a 
   lot of
   automagic which if you understand is very usefull. Might speed things up.

   --
   Thanks,
   Bogdan Bursuc!

I also just read the summary:

Final Advice: There is more to consider than speed when selecting a PHP
framework; other factors such as security, ease of installation and
database support have to be examined as well. Other frameworks may be
slower but have greater and wider community support, in case you have 
some
trouble with the framework there are lots of users that could help who
have working experience with that framework. This is true with CakePHP,
Symfony and Zend framework, all of which are very popular among PHP
developers.

Jeremy Burns
Class Outfit

jeremybu...@classoutfit.com
   http://www.classoutfit.com

On 19 May 2011, at 08:56, Jeremy Burns | Class Outfit wrote:
 Put Michael Schumacher at the wheel of a Skoda and I bet he could 
 beat me
 in Ferarri. Benchmarks are mildy interesting, at best.

 Jeremy Burns
 Class Outfit

 jeremybu...@classoutfit.com
http://www.classoutfit.com

 On 19 May 2011, at 08:53, Bogdan I. Bursuc wrote:
 I've been using Cake 2.0 since 2.0-dev and I say that we should wait 
 for
 the final release and then see the benchmarks. It's way faster than
 1.3. And with so many new cool features.

 --
 Thanks,
 Bogdan Bursuc!

 On May 19, 7:30 am, mutabor kostya.stepa...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi guys,

 Lately, I came across another benchmark of popular PHP frameworks:

http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/7-PHP-Frameworks-Tested-For-Speed/2/

 This is approx. 3rd or 4th benchmark of this type that I came 
 across
 during last couple of month and in every benchmark Cake shows 
 pretty
 poor results.

 As a head of a company that specializes in CakePHP, I am very 
 worried
 about Cake's future. Because even all of these benchmarks are 
 wrong /
 have incorrect results, our customers still trust them and I start
 hearing Anything, but not Cake, please, look at this
 benchmark seems it's not a good piece of software from our
 customers.

 The usual problem with these benchmarks - is they don't set cake up
 correctly in the first place (they use it out of the box; cake ships
 in debug mode, with the session enabled etc.). And correcting that 
 is
 in the hands of the person publishing their results.

 But: How many of your clients use hello world apps?

 Something should be done, even if there is no opportunity to 
 increase
 the speed, I guess Cake should apply some kind of PR actions :)

 The best thing that could be done in your eyes is for someone to
 dedicate a bit of time making cake faster - if only you had a few
 developers you could call upon to do that ... :)

 AD

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php


Re: Cake vs other frameworks benchmarks

2011-05-19 Thread AD7six


On May 19, 7:30 am, mutabor kostya.stepa...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi guys,

 Lately, I came across another benchmark of popular PHP frameworks:

 http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/7-PHP-Frameworks-Tested-For-Speed/2/

 This is approx. 3rd or 4th benchmark of this type that I came across
 during last couple of month and in every benchmark Cake shows pretty
 poor results.

 As a head of a company that specializes in CakePHP, I am very worried
 about Cake's future. Because even all of these benchmarks are wrong /
 have incorrect results, our customers still trust them and I start
 hearing Anything, but not Cake, please, look at this
 benchmark seems it's not a good piece of software from our
 customers.

The usual problem with these benchmarks - is they don't set cake up
correctly in the first place (they use it out of the box; cake ships
in debug mode, with the session enabled etc.). And correcting that is
in the hands of the person publishing their results.

But: How many of your clients use hello world apps?

 Something should be done, even if there is no opportunity to increase
 the speed, I guess Cake should apply some kind of PR actions :)

The best thing that could be done in your eyes is for someone to
dedicate a bit of time making cake faster - if only you had a few
developers you could call upon to do that ... :)

AD

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php


Re: Cake vs other frameworks benchmarks

2011-05-19 Thread Bogdan I. Bursuc
I've been using Cake 2.0 since 2.0-dev and I say that we should wait for the 
final release and then see the benchmarks. It's way faster than 1.3. And with 
so 
many new cool features.

--
Thanks, 
Bogdan Bursuc!


 On May 19, 7:30 am, mutabor kostya.stepa...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi guys,
  
  Lately, I came across another benchmark of popular PHP frameworks:
  
  http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/7-PHP-Frameworks-Tested-For-Speed/2/
  
  This is approx. 3rd or 4th benchmark of this type that I came across
  during last couple of month and in every benchmark Cake shows pretty
  poor results.
  
  As a head of a company that specializes in CakePHP, I am very worried
  about Cake's future. Because even all of these benchmarks are wrong /
  have incorrect results, our customers still trust them and I start
  hearing Anything, but not Cake, please, look at this
  benchmark seems it's not a good piece of software from our
  customers.
 
 The usual problem with these benchmarks - is they don't set cake up
 correctly in the first place (they use it out of the box; cake ships
 in debug mode, with the session enabled etc.). And correcting that is
 in the hands of the person publishing their results.
 
 But: How many of your clients use hello world apps?
 
  Something should be done, even if there is no opportunity to increase
  the speed, I guess Cake should apply some kind of PR actions :)
 
 The best thing that could be done in your eyes is for someone to
 dedicate a bit of time making cake faster - if only you had a few
 developers you could call upon to do that ... :)
 
 AD

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php


Re: Cake vs other frameworks benchmarks

2011-05-19 Thread Jeremy Burns | Class Outfit
Put Michael Schumacher at the wheel of a Skoda and I bet he could beat me in 
Ferarri. Benchmarks are mildy interesting, at best.

Jeremy Burns
Class Outfit

jeremybu...@classoutfit.com
http://www.classoutfit.com

On 19 May 2011, at 08:53, Bogdan I. Bursuc wrote:

 I've been using Cake 2.0 since 2.0-dev and I say that we should wait for the 
 final release and then see the benchmarks. It's way faster than 1.3. And with 
 so 
 many new cool features.
 
 --
 Thanks, 
 Bogdan Bursuc!
 
 
 On May 19, 7:30 am, mutabor kostya.stepa...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi guys,
 
 Lately, I came across another benchmark of popular PHP frameworks:
 
 http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/7-PHP-Frameworks-Tested-For-Speed/2/
 
 This is approx. 3rd or 4th benchmark of this type that I came across
 during last couple of month and in every benchmark Cake shows pretty
 poor results.
 
 As a head of a company that specializes in CakePHP, I am very worried
 about Cake's future. Because even all of these benchmarks are wrong /
 have incorrect results, our customers still trust them and I start
 hearing Anything, but not Cake, please, look at this
 benchmark seems it's not a good piece of software from our
 customers.
 
 The usual problem with these benchmarks - is they don't set cake up
 correctly in the first place (they use it out of the box; cake ships
 in debug mode, with the session enabled etc.). And correcting that is
 in the hands of the person publishing their results.
 
 But: How many of your clients use hello world apps?
 
 Something should be done, even if there is no opportunity to increase
 the speed, I guess Cake should apply some kind of PR actions :)
 
 The best thing that could be done in your eyes is for someone to
 dedicate a bit of time making cake faster - if only you had a few
 developers you could call upon to do that ... :)
 
 AD
 
 -- 
 Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
 http://tv.cakephp.org 
 Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help 
 others with their CakePHP related questions.
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php


Re: Cake vs other frameworks benchmarks

2011-05-19 Thread Jeremy Burns | Class Outfit
I also just read the summary:

Final Advice: There is more to consider than speed when selecting a PHP 
framework; other factors such as security, ease of installation and database 
support have to be examined as well. Other frameworks may be slower but have 
greater and wider community support, in case you have some trouble with the 
framework there are lots of users that could help who have working experience 
with that framework. This is true with CakePHP, Symfony and Zend framework, all 
of which are very popular among PHP developers.

Jeremy Burns
Class Outfit

jeremybu...@classoutfit.com
http://www.classoutfit.com

On 19 May 2011, at 08:56, Jeremy Burns | Class Outfit wrote:

 Put Michael Schumacher at the wheel of a Skoda and I bet he could beat me in 
 Ferarri. Benchmarks are mildy interesting, at best.
 
 Jeremy Burns
 Class Outfit
 
 jeremybu...@classoutfit.com
 http://www.classoutfit.com
 
 On 19 May 2011, at 08:53, Bogdan I. Bursuc wrote:
 
 I've been using Cake 2.0 since 2.0-dev and I say that we should wait for the 
 final release and then see the benchmarks. It's way faster than 1.3. And 
 with so 
 many new cool features.
 
 --
 Thanks, 
 Bogdan Bursuc!
 
 
 On May 19, 7:30 am, mutabor kostya.stepa...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi guys,
 
 Lately, I came across another benchmark of popular PHP frameworks:
 
 http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/7-PHP-Frameworks-Tested-For-Speed/2/
 
 This is approx. 3rd or 4th benchmark of this type that I came across
 during last couple of month and in every benchmark Cake shows pretty
 poor results.
 
 As a head of a company that specializes in CakePHP, I am very worried
 about Cake's future. Because even all of these benchmarks are wrong /
 have incorrect results, our customers still trust them and I start
 hearing Anything, but not Cake, please, look at this
 benchmark seems it's not a good piece of software from our
 customers.
 
 The usual problem with these benchmarks - is they don't set cake up
 correctly in the first place (they use it out of the box; cake ships
 in debug mode, with the session enabled etc.). And correcting that is
 in the hands of the person publishing their results.
 
 But: How many of your clients use hello world apps?
 
 Something should be done, even if there is no opportunity to increase
 the speed, I guess Cake should apply some kind of PR actions :)
 
 The best thing that could be done in your eyes is for someone to
 dedicate a bit of time making cake faster - if only you had a few
 developers you could call upon to do that ... :)
 
 AD
 
 -- 
 Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
 http://tv.cakephp.org 
 Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help 
 others with their CakePHP related questions.
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php
 
 -- 
 Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
 http://tv.cakephp.org 
 Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help 
 others with their CakePHP related questions.
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php


Re: Cake vs other frameworks benchmarks

2011-05-19 Thread Bogdan I. Bursuc
Plus there is the features a framework can offer. If a framework has 3 classes 
don't think it helps u that much. But a framework like Cake which has a lot of 
automagic which if you understand is very usefull. Might speed things up. 

--
Thanks, 
Bogdan Bursuc!


 I also just read the summary:
 
 Final Advice: There is more to consider than speed when selecting a PHP
 framework; other factors such as security, ease of installation and
 database support have to be examined as well. Other frameworks may be
 slower but have greater and wider community support, in case you have some
 trouble with the framework there are lots of users that could help who
 have working experience with that framework. This is true with CakePHP,
 Symfony and Zend framework, all of which are very popular among PHP
 developers.
 
 Jeremy Burns
 Class Outfit
 
 jeremybu...@classoutfit.com
 http://www.classoutfit.com
 
 On 19 May 2011, at 08:56, Jeremy Burns | Class Outfit wrote:
  Put Michael Schumacher at the wheel of a Skoda and I bet he could beat me
  in Ferarri. Benchmarks are mildy interesting, at best.
  
  Jeremy Burns
  Class Outfit
  
  jeremybu...@classoutfit.com
  http://www.classoutfit.com
  
  On 19 May 2011, at 08:53, Bogdan I. Bursuc wrote:
  I've been using Cake 2.0 since 2.0-dev and I say that we should wait for
  the final release and then see the benchmarks. It's way faster than
  1.3. And with so many new cool features.
  
  --
  Thanks,
  Bogdan Bursuc!
  
  On May 19, 7:30 am, mutabor kostya.stepa...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi guys,
  
  Lately, I came across another benchmark of popular PHP frameworks:
  
  http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/7-PHP-Frameworks-Tested-For-Speed/2/
  
  This is approx. 3rd or 4th benchmark of this type that I came across
  during last couple of month and in every benchmark Cake shows pretty
  poor results.
  
  As a head of a company that specializes in CakePHP, I am very worried
  about Cake's future. Because even all of these benchmarks are wrong /
  have incorrect results, our customers still trust them and I start
  hearing Anything, but not Cake, please, look at this
  benchmark seems it's not a good piece of software from our
  customers.
  
  The usual problem with these benchmarks - is they don't set cake up
  correctly in the first place (they use it out of the box; cake ships
  in debug mode, with the session enabled etc.). And correcting that is
  in the hands of the person publishing their results.
  
  But: How many of your clients use hello world apps?
  
  Something should be done, even if there is no opportunity to increase
  the speed, I guess Cake should apply some kind of PR actions :)
  
  The best thing that could be done in your eyes is for someone to
  dedicate a bit of time making cake faster - if only you had a few
  developers you could call upon to do that ... :)
  
  AD

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php


Re: Cake vs other frameworks benchmarks

2011-05-19 Thread Jens Dittrich
This benchmark seems to be pretty senseless. The article does not
provide any reason for using a framework when calling the hello
controller. It does not state anything about the configuration of the
frameworks or anything. So what is the intention of that article? Does
anyone use a framework like this? Download, write 2 lines of code,
deploy?

How can a benchmark like this worry anyone that is not a total
beginner in software development?

On May 19, 7:30 am, mutabor kostya.stepa...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi guys,

 Lately, I came across another benchmark of popular PHP frameworks:

 http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/7-PHP-Frameworks-Tested-For-Speed/2/

 This is approx. 3rd or 4th benchmark of this type that I came across
 during last couple of month and in every benchmark Cake shows pretty
 poor results.

 As a head of a company that specializes in CakePHP, I am very worried
 about Cake's future. Because even all of these benchmarks are wrong /
 have incorrect results, our customers still trust them and I start
 hearing Anything, but not Cake, please, look at this
 benchmark seems it's not a good piece of software from our
 customers.

 Something should be done, even if there is no opportunity to increase
 the speed, I guess Cake should apply some kind of PR actions :)

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php


Re: Cake vs other frameworks benchmarks

2011-05-19 Thread mutabor
Guys, I am not refer to this particular benchmark as there are a lot
of them and of course I do not mean that Cake is bad/slow/etc ... but
they do play their role of making people's (newbies, clients) opinion
of what to use for their projects and that's the real problem as it
may reduce CakePHP community.

On May 19, 12:01 pm, Jens Dittrich jdittr...@gmail.com wrote:
 This benchmark seems to be pretty senseless. The article does not
 provide any reason for using a framework when calling the hello
 controller. It does not state anything about the configuration of the
 frameworks or anything. So what is the intention of that article? Does
 anyone use a framework like this? Download, write 2 lines of code,
 deploy?

 How can a benchmark like this worry anyone that is not a total
 beginner in software development?

 On May 19, 7:30 am, mutabor kostya.stepa...@gmail.com wrote:







  Hi guys,

  Lately, I came across another benchmark of popular PHP frameworks:

 http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/7-PHP-Frameworks-Tested-For-Speed/2/

  This is approx. 3rd or 4th benchmark of this type that I came across
  during last couple of month and in every benchmark Cake shows pretty
  poor results.

  As a head of a company that specializes in CakePHP, I am very worried
  about Cake's future. Because even all of these benchmarks are wrong /
  have incorrect results, our customers still trust them and I start
  hearing Anything, but not Cake, please, look at this
  benchmark seems it's not a good piece of software from our
  customers.

  Something should be done, even if there is no opportunity to increase
  the speed, I guess Cake should apply some kind of PR actions :)

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php


Re: Cake vs other frameworks benchmarks

2011-05-19 Thread Jeremy Burns | Class Outfit
Possibly, but if you play your role correctly as the technical expert, they 
should listen to you, your experience and your advice.

Jeremy Burns
Class Outfit

jeremybu...@classoutfit.com
http://www.classoutfit.com

On 19 May 2011, at 12:23, mutabor wrote:

 Guys, I am not refer to this particular benchmark as there are a lot
 of them and of course I do not mean that Cake is bad/slow/etc ... but
 they do play their role of making people's (newbies, clients) opinion
 of what to use for their projects and that's the real problem as it
 may reduce CakePHP community.
 
 On May 19, 12:01 pm, Jens Dittrich jdittr...@gmail.com wrote:
 This benchmark seems to be pretty senseless. The article does not
 provide any reason for using a framework when calling the hello
 controller. It does not state anything about the configuration of the
 frameworks or anything. So what is the intention of that article? Does
 anyone use a framework like this? Download, write 2 lines of code,
 deploy?
 
 How can a benchmark like this worry anyone that is not a total
 beginner in software development?
 
 On May 19, 7:30 am, mutabor kostya.stepa...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Hi guys,
 
 Lately, I came across another benchmark of popular PHP frameworks:
 
 http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/7-PHP-Frameworks-Tested-For-Speed/2/
 
 This is approx. 3rd or 4th benchmark of this type that I came across
 during last couple of month and in every benchmark Cake shows pretty
 poor results.
 
 As a head of a company that specializes in CakePHP, I am very worried
 about Cake's future. Because even all of these benchmarks are wrong /
 have incorrect results, our customers still trust them and I start
 hearing Anything, but not Cake, please, look at this
 benchmark seems it's not a good piece of software from our
 customers.
 
 Something should be done, even if there is no opportunity to increase
 the speed, I guess Cake should apply some kind of PR actions :)
 
 -- 
 Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
 http://tv.cakephp.org 
 Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help 
 others with their CakePHP related questions.
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php


Re: Cake vs other frameworks benchmarks

2011-05-19 Thread Larry E. Masters
 Guys, I am not refer to this particular benchmark as there are a lot
 of them and of course I do not mean that Cake is bad/slow/etc ... but
 they do play their role of making people's (newbies, clients) opinion
 of what to use for their projects and that's the real problem as it
 may reduce CakePHP community.


mutabor,

I wish I had to time to follow every amateur trying to pull traffic to their
site with these lame excuses of benchmarks. Over the last 6 years I have
responded to numerous benchmarks like this and even given the person setting
up these benchmarks advice on turning off some of the magic in CakePHP so
it is more in line with the setup of the others tested.

As a user of the framework you have just as much ability to put these claims
to rest as anyone working on the CakePHP core team.

-- 
Larry E. Masters

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php


Re: Cake vs other frameworks benchmarks

2011-05-19 Thread mark_story
I like the part where every new framework always wins the benchmark
they run.  Yii did the same thing when they came out, and I'm pretty
sure Symfony2 has also published benchmarks where they won.  Writing
benchmarks is hard, and easy to create slanted/wrong results.

To be honest in development mode CakePHP is slow, but you can easily
get a 2x performance increase by setting things up in a non-noob
fashion.  And the core team is concerned about performance, and
improving it.  If you checkout the in development branch of 2.0,
you'll see some significant improvement.

-Mark

On May 19, 1:30 am, mutabor kostya.stepa...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi guys,

 Lately, I came across another benchmark of popular PHP frameworks:

 http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/7-PHP-Frameworks-Tested-For-Speed/2/

 This is approx. 3rd or 4th benchmark of this type that I came across
 during last couple of month and in every benchmark Cake shows pretty
 poor results.

 As a head of a company that specializes in CakePHP, I am very worried
 about Cake's future. Because even all of these benchmarks are wrong /
 have incorrect results, our customers still trust them and I start
 hearing Anything, but not Cake, please, look at this
 benchmark seems it's not a good piece of software from our
 customers.

 Something should be done, even if there is no opportunity to increase
 the speed, I guess Cake should apply some kind of PR actions :)

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php


Cake vs other frameworks benchmarks

2011-05-18 Thread mutabor
Hi guys,

Lately, I came across another benchmark of popular PHP frameworks:

http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/7-PHP-Frameworks-Tested-For-Speed/2/

This is approx. 3rd or 4th benchmark of this type that I came across
during last couple of month and in every benchmark Cake shows pretty
poor results.

As a head of a company that specializes in CakePHP, I am very worried
about Cake's future. Because even all of these benchmarks are wrong /
have incorrect results, our customers still trust them and I start
hearing Anything, but not Cake, please, look at this
benchmark seems it's not a good piece of software from our
customers.

Something should be done, even if there is no opportunity to increase
the speed, I guess Cake should apply some kind of PR actions :)

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php