Re: 1.2 ready for prime time?

2007-09-11 Thread matw8

Well this is all good news.  Sounds like I'm migrating to 1.2 :-)


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 1.2 ready for prime time?

2007-09-10 Thread Brad Daily

I'll pipe in here to say that the next version of SlideShowPro
Director (1.1) will run on Cake 1.2. We've been in beta testing for a
few months now, and with our current release candidate installed on
north of 500 domains, we haven't seen any Cake related issues. Issues
of my own making, however, are another matter ;)

Brad

---

Brad Daily
Developer, SlideShowPro Director
http://slideshowpro.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Sep 10, 2:50 pm, "Troy Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering how stable 1.2 is currently? I've got a site with a
> minimal feature set currently built with 1.1 and we're about to do a
> significant rework/expansion of the site over the next month. Would it
> make sense to migrate to 1.2? Where can I go to get a good comparison
> of 1.1 vs. 1.2 in regards to features?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Troy.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 1.2 ready for prime time?

2007-09-10 Thread Gwoo

@Ismael
Then why are you still on this list? Or why even bother responding?
I think the expression is "if you dont have something nice to say,
dont say it at all"

@Troy
http://ahsanity.wordpress.com/2007/08/29/cakephp-12-the-romance-continues/
http://www.cakephp.org/files/OCPHP.pdf


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 1.2 ready for prime time?

2007-09-10 Thread John David Anderson (_psychic_)


On Sep 10, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Troy Gilbert wrote:

>
>> Show me how to build Digg with Ruby on Rails and I will believe that
>> RoR is better than a PHP-backed solution.  There, I said it.
>
> I certainly agree with that sentiment (hence, why I built the site
> with CakePHP in the first place). I've read all of "The David's"
> presentations (and books) on RoR and tend to agree with all of the
> *design* decisions, but don't care particularly for the implementation
> -- well, I don't care for Ruby all that much.
>
> Honestly, I spend *most* of my time working in the curly-bracket
> language world (AS3, C#, C++) and while I can pretty fluently read
> Ruby, jumping back and forth between writing it and the others is just
> an unnecessary overhead.
>
> Plus, PHP is a defacto web development standard. I can go anywhere and
> safely expect a LAMP backend on a server. Sure, I can find Rails
> when/if I need it without much of a problem, but LAMP is universal.
>
> It reminds me of my AI professor in college who always espoused the
> virtues of Scheme... my computer science self could appreciate the
> elegance, but my pragmatic self would simply moan and roll his eyes.
>
> I take the Rails community as a source of *inspiration* for my work in
> MVC (with both CakePHP and AS3/Flex), but have decided to skip on
> their implementation for now.
>
> So, it sounds like I should switch the dev-line over to CakePHP 1.2. I
> know the Manual on cakephp.org is aimed at CakePHP 1.1... is there a
> similar doc for CakePHP 1.2 that I could munch on?

We'll be putting up a development version of the 1.2 manual shortly.  
It's not quite complete (re: work in progress), but it's better than  
nothing, and there's about 135 printed pages worth of information we  
can be sharing. Stay tuned.

-- John

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 1.2 ready for prime time?

2007-09-10 Thread francky06l

Just my 2 cents :

I have used 1.1 for my first application now live. I am in development
stage for the second one and I am using 1.2. I admit that I could not
get to 1.1 anymore. Once you tried it, you can't go back ..
I have to migrate my first application, but . well it works and I
wait a big for changes to do the migration ..

To summarize, go for 1.2. There is nothing you can do in 1.1 that 1.2
can't handle, and there is much more in 1.2. If you do not make the
step now, you will have to make it for next project or for an upgrade.
If you look at bakery all the new code is almost 100% for 1.2, 1.1
evolution is now limited mainly to bugs fixing.

Franck

On Sep 10, 9:59 pm, "Mariano Iglesias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> He's not asking if he should try RoR, he's asking about 1.2 availability.
>
> So if you just wanna fill up your inbox with arguments, go somewhere else. I
> know a couple of blogs that would benefit from that.
>
> -MI
>
> ---
>
> Remember, smart coders answer ten questions for every question they ask.
> So be smart, be cool, and share your knowledge.
>
> BAKE ON!
>
> blog:http://www.MarianoIglesias.com.ar
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre
> de Ismael S. Kafeltz
> Enviado el: Lunes, 10 de Septiembre de 2007 04:47 p.m.
> Para: Cake PHP
> Asunto: Re: 1.2 ready for prime time?
>
> I abandoned cake few days ago and now I'm using Ruby on Rails because
> I think cake takes too much time to evolve and I could wait more one
> year to finally use it seriously.
> In my opinion you should study RoR before rework/expansion because you
> will have immediately results.
>
> On 10 set, 15:50, "Troy Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering how stable 1.2 is currently? I've got a site with a
> > minimal feature set currently built with 1.1 and we're about to do a
> > significant rework/expansion of the site over the next month. Would it
> > make sense to migrate to 1.2? Where can I go to get a good comparison
> > of 1.1 vs. 1.2 in regards to features?


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 1.2 ready for prime time?

2007-09-10 Thread Troy Gilbert

> Show me how to build Digg with Ruby on Rails and I will believe that
> RoR is better than a PHP-backed solution.  There, I said it.

I certainly agree with that sentiment (hence, why I built the site
with CakePHP in the first place). I've read all of "The David's"
presentations (and books) on RoR and tend to agree with all of the
*design* decisions, but don't care particularly for the implementation
-- well, I don't care for Ruby all that much.

Honestly, I spend *most* of my time working in the curly-bracket
language world (AS3, C#, C++) and while I can pretty fluently read
Ruby, jumping back and forth between writing it and the others is just
an unnecessary overhead.

Plus, PHP is a defacto web development standard. I can go anywhere and
safely expect a LAMP backend on a server. Sure, I can find Rails
when/if I need it without much of a problem, but LAMP is universal.

It reminds me of my AI professor in college who always espoused the
virtues of Scheme... my computer science self could appreciate the
elegance, but my pragmatic self would simply moan and roll his eyes.

I take the Rails community as a source of *inspiration* for my work in
MVC (with both CakePHP and AS3/Flex), but have decided to skip on
their implementation for now.

So, it sounds like I should switch the dev-line over to CakePHP 1.2. I
know the Manual on cakephp.org is aimed at CakePHP 1.1... is there a
similar doc for CakePHP 1.2 that I could munch on?

Troy.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 1.2 ready for prime time?

2007-09-10 Thread Sonic Baker
My EURO 0.02

I would personally like to applaud and thank the CakePHP team for remaining
focused on releasing *quality* software rather than pumping up their version
numbers like so many commercial  products. I am quite happy to wait as long
as it takes  for 1.2 in the knowledge it'll be solid and feature packed.
I could go on but I won't.

Thanks guys!

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



RE: 1.2 ready for prime time?

2007-09-10 Thread Mariano Iglesias

He's not asking if he should try RoR, he's asking about 1.2 availability.

So if you just wanna fill up your inbox with arguments, go somewhere else. I
know a couple of blogs that would benefit from that.

-MI

---

Remember, smart coders answer ten questions for every question they ask. 
So be smart, be cool, and share your knowledge. 

BAKE ON!

blog: http://www.MarianoIglesias.com.ar

-Mensaje original-
De: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre
de Ismael S. Kafeltz
Enviado el: Lunes, 10 de Septiembre de 2007 04:47 p.m.
Para: Cake PHP
Asunto: Re: 1.2 ready for prime time?


I abandoned cake few days ago and now I'm using Ruby on Rails because
I think cake takes too much time to evolve and I could wait more one
year to finally use it seriously.
In my opinion you should study RoR before rework/expansion because you
will have immediately results.

On 10 set, 15:50, "Troy Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering how stable 1.2 is currently? I've got a site with a
> minimal feature set currently built with 1.1 and we're about to do a
> significant rework/expansion of the site over the next month. Would it
> make sense to migrate to 1.2? Where can I go to get a good comparison
> of 1.1 vs. 1.2 in regards to features?


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 1.2 ready for prime time?

2007-09-10 Thread Chris Hartjes

On 9/10/07, Ismael S. Kafeltz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I abandoned cake few days ago and now I'm using Ruby on Rails because
> I think cake takes too much time to evolve and I could wait more one
> year to finally use it seriously.
> In my opinion you should study RoR before rework/expansion because you
> will have immediately results.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Ahem.

Well, I guess people would prefer a much faster release cycle with
lots of bugs.  Look, I was into Rails at one time as well so I
remember the days when Rails was unstable and had lots of bugs and
there were near-daily releases to fix things that should've been
caught.

In my opinion, there is nothing more that CakePHP can learn from
Rails.  If you really think the core development team is not aware of
what features Rails has, then you are sadly misinformed.

Show me how to build Digg with Ruby on Rails and I will believe that
RoR is better than a PHP-backed solution.  There, I said it.

-- 
Chris Hartjes
Senior Developer
Cake Development Corporation

My motto for 2007:  "Just build it, damnit!"

@TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark
@TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 1.2 ready for prime time?

2007-09-10 Thread Ismael S. Kafeltz

I abandoned cake few days ago and now I'm using Ruby on Rails because
I think cake takes too much time to evolve and I could wait more one
year to finally use it seriously.
In my opinion you should study RoR before rework/expansion because you
will have immediately results.

On 10 set, 15:50, "Troy Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering how stable 1.2 is currently? I've got a site with a
> minimal feature set currently built with 1.1 and we're about to do a
> significant rework/expansion of the site over the next month. Would it
> make sense to migrate to 1.2? Where can I go to get a good comparison
> of 1.1 vs. 1.2 in regards to features?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Troy.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 1.2 ready for prime time?

2007-09-10 Thread Chris Hartjes

On 9/10/07, Troy Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm wondering how stable 1.2 is currently? I've got a site with a
> minimal feature set currently built with 1.1 and we're about to do a
> significant rework/expansion of the site over the next month. Would it
> make sense to migrate to 1.2? Where can I go to get a good comparison
> of 1.1 vs. 1.2 in regards to features?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Troy.

Well, Troy, I work with the bleeding edge of Cake 1.2 every day and
have enough confidence in it to use it with no qualms.  I think the
'alpha' label is misleading, as CakePHP 1.2 is one of the most stable
'alpha' releases of Open Source software I have ever used.


-- 
Chris Hartjes
Senior Developer
Cake Development Corporation

My motto for 2007:  "Just build it, damnit!"

@TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark
@TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---