Re: svn or git?
On Feb 4, 10:50 am, the_undefined wrote: > @pcdinh: The source repository of CakePHP is primarily a tool meant to > assist the *developers* of CakePHP, not the users. Those who wish to > contribute to the development of CakePHP will find Git to be a more > powerful and social tool than SVN. > > What personal need to you have to interact with CakePHP's SVN > repository? I interact with cakes svn repo because I use Git to sync my servers to the latest version of Cake. With Git I can have my own modifications and plugins and merge with the latest Cake version, then easily push to my servers. Thats why I interact with the SVN repo. I guess there are other ways, but since Git has built in support for SVN its really simple to get the changes, merge with your local changes and push to all your servers. > I totally hear your argument that SVN currently enjoys better all- > around support and wide-spread usage. I'm just not sure if it makes > sense to apply in this context hence my previous question. > > -- Felix Geisendörfer aka the_undefined > > On Feb 3, 5:42 pm, pcdinh wrote: > > > It just proves that Linux kernel development is too large and too > > complex to be centralized. New drivers or new file systems can be > > developed separately several years before being merged into the core. > > That is why merging and branching are so good in Git. > > > Regarding to medium project like PHP or small project like CakePHP, is > > it relevant to be distributed? Meanwhile, Subversion has better GUI > > and Windows support. Lots of PHP developers out there do development > > on Windows right? Subversion may be slower but I find that its > > performance has been improved significantly in version 1.5. Even with > > big repositories in Google Code, Subversion 1.4 is fast enough > > > On Feb 3, 8:11 pm, Esoteric wrote: > > > > While the PHP Core team is important, the linux kernel the foundation > > > of most modern linux systems is on git, that should prove something. > > > (just playing devil's advocate to you comment.) > > > > On Feb 3, 4:44 am, Dinh wrote: > > > > > PHP Core Team decides that Subversion is more relevant than Git. > > > > That's why PHP source code is migrated from CVS to Subversion. Think > > > > about that. > > > > > -- > > > > --http://groups.google.com/group/phpvietnam --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
@pcdinh: The source repository of CakePHP is primarily a tool meant to assist the *developers* of CakePHP, not the users. Those who wish to contribute to the development of CakePHP will find Git to be a more powerful and social tool than SVN. What personal need to you have to interact with CakePHP's SVN repository? I totally hear your argument that SVN currently enjoys better all- around support and wide-spread usage. I'm just not sure if it makes sense to apply in this context hence my previous question. -- Felix Geisendörfer aka the_undefined On Feb 3, 5:42 pm, pcdinh wrote: > It just proves that Linux kernel development is too large and too > complex to be centralized. New drivers or new file systems can be > developed separately several years before being merged into the core. > That is why merging and branching are so good in Git. > > Regarding to medium project like PHP or small project like CakePHP, is > it relevant to be distributed? Meanwhile, Subversion has better GUI > and Windows support. Lots of PHP developers out there do development > on Windows right? Subversion may be slower but I find that its > performance has been improved significantly in version 1.5. Even with > big repositories in Google Code, Subversion 1.4 is fast enough > > On Feb 3, 8:11 pm, Esoteric wrote: > > > While the PHP Core team is important, the linux kernel the foundation > > of most modern linux systems is on git, that should prove something. > > (just playing devil's advocate to you comment.) > > > On Feb 3, 4:44 am, Dinh wrote: > > > > PHP Core Team decides that Subversion is more relevant than Git. > > > That's why PHP source code is migrated from CVS to Subversion. Think > > > about that. > > > > -- > > > --http://groups.google.com/group/phpvietnam --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
In my opinion, if you are on a *nix-system, there is no reason whatsoever to use Subversion. Git is so much better it's almost ridiculous. On Windows, I don't know, but I've heard Git is getting there... At work we, unfortunately, switched from Subversion to Perforce. Perforce is arguably a better system than SVN but compared to Git it sucks too. The good thing about Git is that you can use it both with Subversion and Perforce. I almost don't have to touch the shitty Perforce apps at all. Using Git with Subversion is more or less completely transparent. So my advice is to use Git. Linus himself may be a git, but in this talk he is also right: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8 Git is much better suited to a lone developer OR a small dev team OR a ridiculously large one. Using Git for deployment is also really simple and cool, and can be used with your own local repo as well. Just check out .git/hooks dir in any Git repo. You can do something like (this is from a hooks/post-receive, slightly edited): export PUBLISH=/home/someuser/public_html export GIT_DIR=/home/git/somerepo/.git rm -rf $PUBLISH/* cd /home/git/somerepo cd $PUBLISH git checkout -f mkdir -p $PUBLISH/tmp/cache/models mkdir -p $PUBLISH/tmp/cache/persistent mkdir -p $PUBLISH/tmp/cache/views mkdir -p $PUBLISH/tmp/logs mkdir -p $PUBLISH/tmp/sessions mkdir -p $PUBLISH/tmp/tests chmod -R 777 $PUBLISH/tmp chmod -R 777 $PUBLISH/tmp/cache echo "Published files to live web directory..." cake migrate - On Jan 28, 12:00 pm, leo wrote: > This has probably been discussed before, but I can't find anything > specific. > > Why does CakePHP use SVN, while The Chaw appears to use GIT? > > Should I be using one rather than the other? > > Will CakePHP eventually migrate to GIT? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
windows git support is getting better. SVN has a head start with GUI's, I have found that git extensions for windows to be nice - though msys-git has its quirks - I can't get gitweb to work from windows at all, but that is just being extra anyway. 2009/2/3 Esoteric > > I have used subversion for years, but what I love about git, is that I > don't have to be online or dependent on a server to commit changes, > commiting changes is almost completely instant with git and I only > have to push to the server when I want to. > > Granted SVN has great windows support and GUI support, but I am a > command line guy, and I don't use windows anymore for development. :) > > When it comes down to it, to each his own. > > On Feb 3, 11:42 am, pcdinh wrote: > > It just proves that Linux kernel development is too large and too > > complex to be centralized. New drivers or new file systems can be > > developed separately several years before being merged into the core. > > That is why merging and branching are so good in Git. > > > > Regarding to medium project like PHP or small project like CakePHP, is > > it relevant to be distributed? Meanwhile, Subversion has better GUI > > and Windows support. Lots of PHP developers out there do development > > on Windows right? Subversion may be slower but I find that its > > performance has been improved significantly in version 1.5. Even with > > big repositories in Google Code, Subversion 1.4 is fast enough > > > > On Feb 3, 8:11 pm, Esoteric wrote: > > > > > > > > > While the PHP Core team is important, the linux kernel the foundation > > > of most modern linux systems is on git, that should prove something. > > > (just playing devil's advocate to you comment.) > > > > > On Feb 3, 4:44 am, Dinh wrote: > > > > > > PHP Core Team decides that Subversion is more relevant than Git. > > > > That's why PHP source code is migrated from CVS to Subversion. Think > > > > about that. > > > > > > -- > > > > --http://groups.google.com/group/phpvietnam- Hide quoted > text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
I have used subversion for years, but what I love about git, is that I don't have to be online or dependent on a server to commit changes, commiting changes is almost completely instant with git and I only have to push to the server when I want to. Granted SVN has great windows support and GUI support, but I am a command line guy, and I don't use windows anymore for development. :) When it comes down to it, to each his own. On Feb 3, 11:42 am, pcdinh wrote: > It just proves that Linux kernel development is too large and too > complex to be centralized. New drivers or new file systems can be > developed separately several years before being merged into the core. > That is why merging and branching are so good in Git. > > Regarding to medium project like PHP or small project like CakePHP, is > it relevant to be distributed? Meanwhile, Subversion has better GUI > and Windows support. Lots of PHP developers out there do development > on Windows right? Subversion may be slower but I find that its > performance has been improved significantly in version 1.5. Even with > big repositories in Google Code, Subversion 1.4 is fast enough > > On Feb 3, 8:11 pm, Esoteric wrote: > > > > > While the PHP Core team is important, the linux kernel the foundation > > of most modern linux systems is on git, that should prove something. > > (just playing devil's advocate to you comment.) > > > On Feb 3, 4:44 am, Dinh wrote: > > > > PHP Core Team decides that Subversion is more relevant than Git. > > > That's why PHP source code is migrated from CVS to Subversion. Think > > > about that. > > > > -- > > > --http://groups.google.com/group/phpvietnam- Hide quoted text > > > - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
It just proves that Linux kernel development is too large and too complex to be centralized. New drivers or new file systems can be developed separately several years before being merged into the core. That is why merging and branching are so good in Git. Regarding to medium project like PHP or small project like CakePHP, is it relevant to be distributed? Meanwhile, Subversion has better GUI and Windows support. Lots of PHP developers out there do development on Windows right? Subversion may be slower but I find that its performance has been improved significantly in version 1.5. Even with big repositories in Google Code, Subversion 1.4 is fast enough On Feb 3, 8:11 pm, Esoteric wrote: > While the PHP Core team is important, the linux kernel the foundation > of most modern linux systems is on git, that should prove something. > (just playing devil's advocate to you comment.) > > On Feb 3, 4:44 am, Dinh wrote: > > > PHP Core Team decides that Subversion is more relevant than Git. > > That's why PHP source code is migrated from CVS to Subversion. Think > > about that. > > > -- > > --http://groups.google.com/group/phpvietnam --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
@Sam
I use this to clean my folders before uploading to the production
server (I don't checkout to that server).
cd where/you/have/svn/crap
find ./ -name ".svn" -exec rm -rf {} \;
/Martin
On Feb 3, 2:34 pm, Sam Sherlock wrote:
> For me Git because "complex is better than complicated, now is better than
> never"
>
> also AFAIK git can svn, though svn can not git. I might perhaps revisit svn
> after becoming fully intimate with all that git has to offer. As I never
> really got of the ground with SVN whereas I got right into git though
> perhaps trying to get to grips with svn give me a head start with git
>
> +also thanks to svn I have some undeletable folders with these 'paste line'
> files ?? and nothing will get rid of them
>
> http://neeraj.name/blog/articles/789-how-to-use-branch-feature-of-git...http://www.gnome.org/~newren/eg/git-for-svn-users.htmlhttp://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitSvnComparsion
>
> 2009/2/3 Esoteric
>
>
>
> > While the PHP Core team is important, the linux kernel the foundation
> > of most modern linux systems is on git, that should prove something.
> > (just playing devil's advocate to you comment.)
>
> > On Feb 3, 4:44 am, Dinh wrote:
> > > PHP Core Team decides that Subversion is more relevant than Git.
> > > That's why PHP source code is migrated from CVS to Subversion. Think
> > > about that.
>
> > > --
> > > --http://groups.google.com/group/phpvietnam
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
For me Git because "complex is better than complicated, now is better than never" also AFAIK git can svn, though svn can not git. I might perhaps revisit svn after becoming fully intimate with all that git has to offer. As I never really got of the ground with SVN whereas I got right into git though perhaps trying to get to grips with svn give me a head start with git +also thanks to svn I have some undeletable folders with these 'paste line' files ?? and nothing will get rid of them http://neeraj.name/blog/articles/789-how-to-use-branch-feature-of-git-and-work-with-github http://www.gnome.org/~newren/eg/git-for-svn-users.html http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitSvnComparsion 2009/2/3 Esoteric > > While the PHP Core team is important, the linux kernel the foundation > of most modern linux systems is on git, that should prove something. > (just playing devil's advocate to you comment.) > > On Feb 3, 4:44 am, Dinh wrote: > > PHP Core Team decides that Subversion is more relevant than Git. > > That's why PHP source code is migrated from CVS to Subversion. Think > > about that. > > > > -- > > --http://groups.google.com/group/phpvietnam > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
While the PHP Core team is important, the linux kernel the foundation of most modern linux systems is on git, that should prove something. (just playing devil's advocate to you comment.) On Feb 3, 4:44 am, Dinh wrote: > PHP Core Team decides that Subversion is more relevant than Git. > That's why PHP source code is migrated from CVS to Subversion. Think > about that. > > -- > --http://groups.google.com/group/phpvietnam --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
PHP Core Team decides that Subversion is more relevant than Git. That's why PHP source code is migrated from CVS to Subversion. Think about that. -- -- http://groups.google.com/group/phpvietnam --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
Just found this website in relation to the whole "What the Eff is this git thing I keep hearing about?" http://gitready.com/ On Feb 2, 1:40 pm, Martin Westin wrote: > @leo I know what you mean. That is why, for two years, I stubbornly > kept using SmartSVN, which is free but horrible in comparison. After > trying Cornerstone and smiling with every commit, I gladly paid the > license for Cornerstone... or I should say my employer reluctantly > did :) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
@leo I know what you mean. That is why, for two years, I stubbornly kept using SmartSVN, which is free but horrible in comparison. After trying Cornerstone and smiling with every commit, I gladly paid the license for Cornerstone... or I should say my employer reluctantly did :) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
I use the Textmate Bundle SVNMate (http://ciaranwal.sh/2007/11/29/ svnmate-update) its really wonderfull working with. And on office where we use svn+ssh protocol it even supports that to. Also have the svnX, but its a little more hazzle working with. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
Personally I will continue to use Subversion, because in my context (small developper team) Subversion is perfect and also my favorit deployment tool, Fredistrano http://code.google.com/p/fredistrano/ , does not support Git yet. On Jan 28, 12:00 pm, leo wrote: > This has probably been discussed before, but I can't find anything > specific. > > Why does CakePHP use SVN, while The Chaw appears to use GIT? > > Should I be using one rather than the other? > > Will CakePHP eventually migrate to GIT? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
Using Git is cool. Don't you wanna be cool? :) All the kids are using it, you should try it too... On Jan 29, 10:07 am, leo wrote: > @martin - yep I agree. I've tried them both and Cornerstone is great. > I don't like paying for stuff like that though. The kind of things > that are almost always freeware on Windows are nearly always payware > on Mac :( > > Don't really know which to go with. I guess I'll stick with Subversion > for now, but keep an eye on Git. I work mainly by myself, so I could > argue (with myself) that all I need is TimeMachine. But I don't think > I'd go for that. > > On Jan 29, 3:16 pm, Martin Westin wrote: > > > If you are on Mac OS X you should really look at Versions and > > Cornerstone. They are both excellent subversion clients that are very > > "Mac". I bought Cornerstone after using "Smart"SVN for a while (read > > years) and it's a world of difference, even for something as basic as > > versioning code. > > > Well, if you decide to stay with svn, that is. :) > > > (I love a server with cli but on a 24" screen I feel silly typing cli > > commands all day) > > > On Jan 28, 1:09 pm, leo wrote: > > > > > > Should I be using one rather than the other? > > > > > > Will CakePHP eventually migrate to GIT? > > > > Here I didn't mean which is best for me, but which way is CakePHP > > > going and would I be advised to follow? I already use SVN but it was a > > > git to set up on OS X. > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
@martin - yep I agree. I've tried them both and Cornerstone is great. I don't like paying for stuff like that though. The kind of things that are almost always freeware on Windows are nearly always payware on Mac :( Don't really know which to go with. I guess I'll stick with Subversion for now, but keep an eye on Git. I work mainly by myself, so I could argue (with myself) that all I need is TimeMachine. But I don't think I'd go for that. On Jan 29, 3:16 pm, Martin Westin wrote: > If you are on Mac OS X you should really look at Versions and > Cornerstone. They are both excellent subversion clients that are very > "Mac". I bought Cornerstone after using "Smart"SVN for a while (read > years) and it's a world of difference, even for something as basic as > versioning code. > > Well, if you decide to stay with svn, that is. :) > > (I love a server with cli but on a 24" screen I feel silly typing cli > commands all day) > > On Jan 28, 1:09 pm, leo wrote: > > > > > Should I be using one rather than the other? > > > > > Will CakePHP eventually migrate to GIT? > > > Here I didn't mean which is best for me, but which way is CakePHP > > going and would I be advised to follow? I already use SVN but it was a > > git to set up on OS X. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
In my opinion Git is where it is at and I am glad to see that CakePHP will be moving to Git eventually, because it is vastly superior IMO than SVN plus you don't have to rely on a server to commit changes as it is all local until you wnat to push to a server if you choose to. Enjoy. -Erik On Jan 29, 9:16 am, Martin Westin wrote: > If you are on Mac OS X you should really look at Versions and > Cornerstone. They are both excellent subversion clients that are very > "Mac". I bought Cornerstone after using "Smart"SVN for a while (read > years) and it's a world of difference, even for something as basic as > versioning code. > > Well, if you decide to stay with svn, that is. :) > > (I love a server with cli but on a 24" screen I feel silly typing cli > commands all day) > > On Jan 28, 1:09 pm, leo wrote: > > > > > > > Should I be using one rather than the other? > > > > > Will CakePHP eventually migrate to GIT? > > > Here I didn't mean which is best for me, but which way is CakePHP > > going and would I be advised to follow? I already use SVN but it was a > > git to set up on OS X.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
If you are on Mac OS X you should really look at Versions and Cornerstone. They are both excellent subversion clients that are very "Mac". I bought Cornerstone after using "Smart"SVN for a while (read years) and it's a world of difference, even for something as basic as versioning code. Well, if you decide to stay with svn, that is. :) (I love a server with cli but on a 24" screen I feel silly typing cli commands all day) On Jan 28, 1:09 pm, leo wrote: > > > Should I be using one rather than the other? > > > > Will CakePHP eventually migrate to GIT? > > Here I didn't mean which is best for me, but which way is CakePHP > going and would I be advised to follow? I already use SVN but it was a > git to set up on OS X. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
Thanks, Gwoo, that's what I wanted to know. It's like a vote of confidence in Git. Now I'll investigate it. On Jan 28, 7:48 pm, Gwoo wrote: > > Why does CakePHP use SVN. > > Because when we started CakePHP 3 years ago, Git did not exist. > > > while The Chaw appears to use GIT? > > Because now Git exists and we like it. But as was said Chaw supports > both, so if you have a new project you can choose based on your > preference. > > > Will CakePHP eventually migrate to GIT? > > yes. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
> Why does CakePHP use SVN. Because when we started CakePHP 3 years ago, Git did not exist. > while The Chaw appears to use GIT? Because now Git exists and we like it. But as was said Chaw supports both, so if you have a new project you can choose based on your preference. > Will CakePHP eventually migrate to GIT? yes. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
You should be able to install both SVN and Git with ease through MacPorts. That's how I installed them, was pretty easy. -Mark On Jan 28, 7:09 am, leo wrote: > > > Should I be using one rather than the other? > > > > Will CakePHP eventually migrate to GIT? > > Here I didn't mean which is best for me, but which way is CakePHP > going and would I be advised to follow? I already use SVN but it was a > git to set up on OS X. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
> > Should I be using one rather than the other? > > > Will CakePHP eventually migrate to GIT? Here I didn't mean which is best for me, but which way is CakePHP going and would I be advised to follow? I already use SVN but it was a git to set up on OS X. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: svn or git?
The Chaw supports both SVN and Git. You will find the core team move around between SVN ang Git for various projects. This question can probably be answered by looking at the key differences between Git and Svn. The most significant, and most obvious, being the distributed nature of Git. I suggest you dive into the documentation for Git, and for Subversion, and see which best suits your needs. If you still cant decide, just jump in and try one. Better to be versioning code with the wrong system than with no system at all. Lastly, try discussing it on the git or SVN mailing lists. Thats probably the right spot for discussing it. Cheers, Graham On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:00:30 -0800 (PST), leo wrote: > This has probably been discussed before, but I can't find anything > specific. > > Why does CakePHP use SVN, while The Chaw appears to use GIT? > > Should I be using one rather than the other? > > Will CakePHP eventually migrate to GIT? > -- Cheers, Graham Weldon w. http://grahamweldon.com e. gra...@grahamweldon.com p. +61 407 017 293 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
