Re: [Callers] Chinese Fan from Square dance
Another thing to consider is progressing on to the next. Chinese Fan is fuzzy about where moves end, as the star turns. So you need to have dancers promenade "to progressed places", rather than just circling halfway or some such. I've found dancers have great trouble with this, at least partly because 4-face-4 is an uncommon formation, so they can't just progress by autopilot. Some of my biggest and most memorable crashes when testing dances have resulted from this problem. -Chris Page San Diego
Re: [Callers] Chinese Fan from Square dance
--snip-- > If you call Chinese Fan such that the mini stars are longer, folks end up > back with their partners. With skilled dancers you can do that > intentionally just by adding an extra four counts of patter in. At speed, > the ladies wind up turning 1 and 1/2 times, the men go all the way around, > and that is perfectly legitimate for the caller to do. --snip-- Just thinking about the elbow hold as a mini star will confuse some dancers. It certainly confused me. Having this duo hang out (or migrate rotationally) while the center star rotates all the way around sounds to me like a disaster. I'd have difficulty doing it. I can keep oriented while swinging, and I have good timing. I'm not sure what you'd gain by doing the long girl's spin. I have danced the Chinese Fan many times, and called it twice to teenagers - some of whom have never danced anything before. Aiming for the next spoke is easy. When first teaching, coach the one who rolled back to hook elbows with the next. The Chinese Fan works because the Turn Back / Pickup / Drop off / Catch are so close in space and well in sync. The only times I've seen it totally fall apart is when the center star stops turning. Once the dancers have the basic fan, you can do a butterfly whirl and put the girls in the center. (Texas Star) If things are going really well, you can do the Chinese Fan with half sashayed couples alternating with standard couples. (or with same sex couples). Set it up again. Maybe: Heads make a Star. turn it once around, then Pick up your Corner for a Star Promenade. Side [Boy / Girl] Roll Back for a Chinese Fan. Both the Chinese Fan and Texas Star work for 6 couples. You should be able to call at the same time to groups with both 4 and 6 couples. --- I had problems trying to call the Chinese Fan to the phrase, contra style. This is a good time to have the band play a crooked tune. Gloria Krusemeyer
Re: [Callers] Transgressive contras
Hi Luke, Thanks for sharing all of this! I'm looking for ideas for a sophisticated crowd and a very square room; 4x4s (and 6x6s etc) end up progressing folks to the same neighbors multiple times, and no one cares to be inactive. I could likely get away with one dance where I'd call all the way through; typically I've been dropping out after ~5 times through with this crowd. I'll check out the Mad Robin site and let you know what, if anything, I decide to try! Lindsey (PS: Odd connection- I'm the girlfriend of your brother's former housemate in WA; we've had Jason over for dinner.) From: Luke DonforthTo: Lindsey Dono Cc: "callers@lists.sharedweight.net" Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 11:37 AM Subject: Re: [Callers] Transgressive contras I should note, I've never actually tried calling "Luke's Options are Limited" it was mostly a theoretical exercise for me. To my knowledge it's never been danced. If you have only two sets, it's not clear to me how a transgressive contras are functionally different than 4 face 4 dances or their cousin, Tempest Formation. (In my box, I'd put "Kim's Game" under Tempest Formation.) The Tempest: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qNp-n4CbdI It becomes a question of if everyone is changing lines, or just half the couples are, but you're bouncing back and forth. If that's all you want, great. There's lots of room to write more 4 face 4 and tempest formation dances, and you can incorporate pass through lines there. If you have more than two sets involved, I haven't found a way to keep things from being either complicated or boring for some dancers. Option 1: all 1s and 2s progress the same way every time If you have a progression that's down one couple, and over one set to the left for the 1s, and up one couple over one set to the right for the 2s, you no longer change numbers when you reach the bottom of the hall, you also change numbers when you reach the sides. So even with 5 sets across and 20 hands four deep, nobody is going to go more than 5 hands-four from their original position. If you've got a square (10 sets across, 10 hands four deep, etc) some folks on the main diagonal see 10 different couples, but other folks will bounce back and fourth on short diagonals of just a few couples. Option 2: have options that vary the progression This is what "Luke's Options are Limited" attempts to do (http://www.madrobincallers.org/2013/01/25/attempting-a-grid-contra-choreography/ ). If gives you different dances (thematically linked) to travel to different points on the floor. You could find other pairs of improper/becket dances using wide lines and long lines, and even incorporate passing through lines. But you're stuck with having to have different dances to call and be calling all the way through the dance. I personally try and get out of the way of the band and dancers interacting, and dislike calling through the entire dance. Option 3: expand 4 face 4 to 6 face 6, 8 face 8, etc. I played around with this a bit, and I think others have as well (Roger Auman?). There are dances up at http://www.madrobincallers.org/2014/02/26/6-facing-6-contra-dances/ I haven't done anything with them after writing them, but if they inspire you; feel free to use them. The hard part (in my opinion) is giving everyone something interesting to do. If your line of 6 has a pass through along the set, you've got to keep your trail buddy groups together and permuting, or some folks get a bum ride. Option 4: I haven't found one, but let me know if you do! Have fun. On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Michael Dyck via Callers wrote: On 15-05-01 01:02 AM, Lindsey Dono wrote: Is "grid contra" the more standard terminology than "transgressive?" I hadn't heard the term "transgressive contra" before, and I'm not finding hits for the term in search engines. Here's what I've got: 1990-1995 Chris Kermiet: "Beckett's Crossing" (in his "Zany Contras and Other Stuff!") http://k-1.us/contras/beckettscrossing.html (refers to it as "a progressive contra dance") May 2010 Peter Foster: "Crisscross" http://pfoster.pcug.org.au/dance/contra.htm#cri (Doesn't really have a term for the dance form.) Jan 2012? Seth Tepfer: "Transgression" http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers-sharedweight.net/2012-January/004159.html (refers to it as a "grid contra", but also refers to progression across as "transgression", hence the dance's title) See also other posts in that thread. Jan 2013 Luke Donforth: "Luke's Options are Limited" http://www.madrobincallers.org/2013/01/25/attempting-a-grid-contra-choreography/ (refers to it as a "grid contra") -Michael ___ Callers mailing list Callers@lists.sharedweight.net http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net -- Luke Donforth luke.donfo...@gmail.com
Re: [Callers] Itty-bitty dances, triplets, odd numbers
On 5/4/2015 7:14 AM, Bill Olson via Callers wrote: Kalia, You said you already had a triplet with contra corners in it, BUT I figured I'd offer this anyway. I often call Chorus Jig as a triplet, (B2 being 1's (bal and) swing to bottom of set and others move up). I found that in a triplet dancers can learn contra corners very easily without the confusion that comes in a duple set. With Chorus Jig, in addition to the distinctive choreography you mentioned, there's also the historical significance of calling a dance 100's of years old I guess. bill My cunning plan, when I was envisioning a huge crowd of 7 or 8 couples*, was to teach Microchasmic early in the evening to get the contra corners concept across, and then do Chorus Jig later on. The best laid plans oft gang agley... Kalia
Re: [Callers] Itty-bitty dances, triplets, odd numbers
On 5/4/2015 6:57 AM, Martha Wild via Callers wrote: Though it may seem like heresy to do it without the associated tune, Levi Jackson Rag can be done to other thirty-two bar tunes if the band doesn't know the required tune, and is good for 5 couples. That was at the top of my mind for this dance, but the band vetoed it. "We play old-time tunes, that's it." Okey dokey, then. We work with what we've got. And anyway, we topped out at 9 dancers with me on the floor, so LJR wouldn't have worked even if the band had been on board. Such is life :>) Kalia
Re: [Callers] Itty-bitty dances, triplets, odd numbers
On 5/3/2015 9:02 PM, Paul Wilde wrote: Kalia, I love David's Triplet # 5 (David Smuckler). It has a lovely hey for 6 w/ a P Gypsy Meltdown to finish. I just revisited David's site yesterday and looked through his set of triplets and that one looked really nice so I added it to my collection. Thanks for the recommendation. Kalia
Re: [Callers] Chinese Fan from Square dance
Hi Neal and All, thank you for the replies and help. I can see that it's not a simple choreography issue. I will give the floor pattern/teaching to my friend to see how choreography goes. I will ask an Advanced caller who knows how to teach Chinese Fan to see if they want to try the Contra 4x4, AFTER teaching a square with the Chinese Fan, so the crowd knows it already. Neal, I hear you on bringing a square move to Contra. And I've experienced some new contras that are not so rigid or linear, so I thought it might work. Thanks everyone! claire On May 4, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Neal Schleinwrote: Hi Claire, I can help, but am not certain you asked for what you truly want. Are you really looking for a set of calls for the square, or do you need directions for the floor pattern, teaching instructions, a working timing for the square-style calls, or the timing of the figure for a contra setting? I'm asking because I suspect your friend doesn't actually need the calls. This is going to open a can of worms on the list, but contras and mescalonzas (aka 4x4 dances) are prompted, not called. Although most dancers and many callers don't make a distinction, the mechanics and timing of the two techniques are different. If you move Chinese Fan into a contra-type setting, the calls (as a square dance caller would see them) are technically irrelevant because you wouldn't want to use them. (And, with many figures, you can't use them without either changing the wording, changing the timing, or stepping outside of the contra-prompting technique.) What I am betting he actually needs to know is the full floor pattern and the timing of that sequence. The Call For someone who knows the Chinese Fan figure is coming and how to do it, the only necessary words for prompting are some variation on: Head (side) ladies turn back (lead, roll back, open out...) for a Chinese fan. (After completion, repeat for either same ladies or other pair of ladies) That would suffice for a New England style square or a quadrille, as everything else in the call is just filler. A longer call with patter would be personalized to the caller and the region; in my calling tradition, there would be near-constant running patter throughout. Both the phrasing and the timing of the above would port over to contras and your 4x4, although you wouldn't need to identify the leading parties because their identity would be pre-defined. Floor pattern/teaching Start in a Star Promenade; men keep the star and continue turning it moving throughout. Identified ladies will turn out and away from their partner to face the other direction, and then hook free elbows with the lady behind them. Ladies turn 1/2 while men turn the star 1/4; lead lady rejoins the star promenade with next man to arrive (original opposite). Star turns another 1/4 and the following ladies rejoin star promenade with the next man behind (original opposite). Repeat with either lady to return to partner. Timing If done precisely, each piece can be accomplished in 2 counts and it takes 6 counts to complete the figure: 1-2 Lead lady turns away from partner to face reverse direction; star moves forward 1/4. (ending position: Ladies have met to hook elbows in the position the lead ladies were in.) 3-4 Men rotate star one position while ladies turn 1/2. (Ending position: Lead lady has rejoined star with opposite man and released following lady.) 5-6 Star rotates 1/4; following ladies ladies loop toward center and rejoin star. (Ending formation: Star Promenade. Ending location: All with opposite person from start. Men have moved forward 3/4 around circle, and ladies have moved forward 1/4 from beginning position.) That is a tight, performance-style timing. In reality, it takes between 2 and 4 beats per part and a total of 8 to 12 counts to complete; also, if called square to the walls the action will actually happen on the corner diagonals and the set will have turned somewhat less than the full men 3/4 ladies 1/4. Also...and this is an entirely personal opinion and something of a soapbox... I would caution against moving this figure out of its traditional environment, especially if you really love it. I know lots of people on here will disagree with me, but figures that are lively, expansive, and joyously free in their original square-dance context (such as basket swings, the docey-do, Harlem Rosettes, or Texas Stars and the related figures) tend to be greatly diminished when shoehorned into the rigid 8 count phrase and linear, mechanical, progressive format of contra dancing. Sometimes it is done successfully, but not very often. (End of soap box.) Good luck; if your friend does want a set of calls for the square dance version, I can write something up. Neal Schlein Neal Schlein Youth Services Librarian, Mahomet Public Library Currently reading: The Different Girl by Gordon Dahlquist Currently
Re: [Callers] Chinese Fan from Square dance
I think Neal makes very good points about the wisdom of transferring square-dance moves to contras. I think such transfers can be fun if done well, but the teach must be very efficient or else will be likely to frustrate dancers. The challenge grows steeper for a newish caller. Consider whether such a transfer is justified. --Jerome Jerome Grisanti 660-528-0858 http://www.jeromegrisanti.com “Dance like no one is watching... Because they are not... They are checking their phone. On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Neal Schlein via Callers < callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: > Hi Claire, > > I can help, but am not certain you asked for what you truly want. Are you > really looking for a set of calls for the square, or do you need directions > for the floor pattern, teaching instructions, a working timing for the > square-style calls, or the timing of the figure for a contra setting? > > I'm asking because I suspect your friend doesn't actually need the calls. > This is going to open a can of worms on the list, but contras and > mescalonzas (aka 4x4 dances) are prompted, not called. Although most > dancers and many callers don't make a distinction, the mechanics and timing > of the two techniques are different. If you move Chinese Fan into a > contra-type setting, the calls (as a square dance caller would see them) > are technically irrelevant because you wouldn't want to use them. (And, > with many figures, you can't use them without either changing the wording, > changing the timing, or stepping outside of the contra-prompting > technique.) What I am betting he actually needs to know is the full floor > pattern and the timing of that sequence. > > *The Call* > For someone who knows the Chinese Fan figure is coming and how to do it, > the only necessary words for prompting are some variation on: > *Head (side) ladies turn back (lead, roll back, open out...) for a Chinese > fan.* (After completion, repeat for either same ladies or other pair of > ladies) > > That would suffice for a New England style square or a quadrille, as > everything else in the call is just filler. A longer call with patter > would be personalized to the caller and the region; in my calling > tradition, there would be near-constant running patter throughout. Both > the phrasing and the timing of the above would port over to contras and > your 4x4, although you wouldn't need to identify the leading parties > because their identity would be pre-defined. > > *Floor pattern/teaching* > Start in a Star Promenade; men keep the star and continue turning it > moving throughout. Identified ladies will turn out and away from their > partner to face the other direction, and then hook free elbows with the > lady behind them. Ladies turn 1/2 while men turn the star 1/4; lead lady > rejoins the star promenade with next man to arrive (original opposite). > Star turns another 1/4 and the following ladies rejoin star promenade with > the next man behind (original opposite). Repeat with either lady to return > to partner. > > *Timing* > If done precisely, each piece can be accomplished in 2 counts and it takes > 6 counts to complete the figure: > 1-2 Lead lady turns away from partner to face reverse direction; star > moves forward 1/4. (ending position: Ladies have met to hook elbows in the > position the lead ladies were in.) > 3-4 Men rotate star one position while ladies turn 1/2. (Ending position: > Lead lady has rejoined star with opposite man and released following lady.) > 5-6 Star rotates 1/4; following ladies ladies loop toward center and > rejoin star. (Ending formation: Star Promenade. Ending location: All with > opposite person from start. Men have moved forward 3/4 around circle, and > ladies have moved forward 1/4 from beginning position.) > > That is a tight, performance-style timing. In reality, it takes between 2 > and 4 beats per part and a total of 8 to 12 counts to complete; also, if > called square to the walls the action will actually happen on the corner > diagonals and the set will have turned somewhat less than the full men 3/4 > ladies 1/4. > > > Also...and this is an entirely personal opinion and something of a > soapbox... I would caution against moving this figure out of its > traditional environment, especially if you really love it. I know lots of > people on here will disagree with me, but figures that are lively, > expansive, and joyously free in their original square-dance context (such > as basket swings, the docey-do, Harlem Rosettes, or Texas Stars and the > related figures) tend to be greatly diminished when shoehorned into the > rigid 8 count phrase and linear, mechanical, progressive format of contra > dancing. Sometimes it is done successfully, but not very often. (End of > soap box.) > > > Good luck; if your friend does want a set of calls for the square dance > version, I can write something up. > Neal Schlein > > Neal Schlein > Youth Services Librarian, Mahomet Public Library > > >
Re: [Callers] Chinese Fan from Square dance
Hi Claire, I can help, but am not certain you asked for what you truly want. Are you really looking for a set of calls for the square, or do you need directions for the floor pattern, teaching instructions, a working timing for the square-style calls, or the timing of the figure for a contra setting? I'm asking because I suspect your friend doesn't actually need the calls. This is going to open a can of worms on the list, but contras and mescalonzas (aka 4x4 dances) are prompted, not called. Although most dancers and many callers don't make a distinction, the mechanics and timing of the two techniques are different. If you move Chinese Fan into a contra-type setting, the calls (as a square dance caller would see them) are technically irrelevant because you wouldn't want to use them. (And, with many figures, you can't use them without either changing the wording, changing the timing, or stepping outside of the contra-prompting technique.) What I am betting he actually needs to know is the full floor pattern and the timing of that sequence. *The Call* For someone who knows the Chinese Fan figure is coming and how to do it, the only necessary words for prompting are some variation on: *Head (side) ladies turn back (lead, roll back, open out...) for a Chinese fan.* (After completion, repeat for either same ladies or other pair of ladies) That would suffice for a New England style square or a quadrille, as everything else in the call is just filler. A longer call with patter would be personalized to the caller and the region; in my calling tradition, there would be near-constant running patter throughout. Both the phrasing and the timing of the above would port over to contras and your 4x4, although you wouldn't need to identify the leading parties because their identity would be pre-defined. *Floor pattern/teaching* Start in a Star Promenade; men keep the star and continue turning it moving throughout. Identified ladies will turn out and away from their partner to face the other direction, and then hook free elbows with the lady behind them. Ladies turn 1/2 while men turn the star 1/4; lead lady rejoins the star promenade with next man to arrive (original opposite). Star turns another 1/4 and the following ladies rejoin star promenade with the next man behind (original opposite). Repeat with either lady to return to partner. *Timing* If done precisely, each piece can be accomplished in 2 counts and it takes 6 counts to complete the figure: 1-2 Lead lady turns away from partner to face reverse direction; star moves forward 1/4. (ending position: Ladies have met to hook elbows in the position the lead ladies were in.) 3-4 Men rotate star one position while ladies turn 1/2. (Ending position: Lead lady has rejoined star with opposite man and released following lady.) 5-6 Star rotates 1/4; following ladies ladies loop toward center and rejoin star. (Ending formation: Star Promenade. Ending location: All with opposite person from start. Men have moved forward 3/4 around circle, and ladies have moved forward 1/4 from beginning position.) That is a tight, performance-style timing. In reality, it takes between 2 and 4 beats per part and a total of 8 to 12 counts to complete; also, if called square to the walls the action will actually happen on the corner diagonals and the set will have turned somewhat less than the full men 3/4 ladies 1/4. Also...and this is an entirely personal opinion and something of a soapbox... I would caution against moving this figure out of its traditional environment, especially if you really love it. I know lots of people on here will disagree with me, but figures that are lively, expansive, and joyously free in their original square-dance context (such as basket swings, the docey-do, Harlem Rosettes, or Texas Stars and the related figures) tend to be greatly diminished when shoehorned into the rigid 8 count phrase and linear, mechanical, progressive format of contra dancing. Sometimes it is done successfully, but not very often. (End of soap box.) Good luck; if your friend does want a set of calls for the square dance version, I can write something up. Neal Schlein Neal Schlein Youth Services Librarian, Mahomet Public Library Currently reading: *The Different Girl* by Gordon Dahlquist Currently learning: How to set up an automated email system. On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Claire Takemori via Callers < callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: > Hi. > I'm new to the list, not a caller yet, but wanting to learn more about > Contra dance and maybe calling. > > I've got a friend who is writing a 4x4 contra for me with a Chinese Fan in > it. He needs to know how to call the Fan as he can't figure it out from > the one video I've found on youtube that has it in it (Three Arches) > www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8c6Xzn3AyE > > Can you tell me how to call a Chinese Fan? > > Thanks! > claire > ___ > Callers mailing list >
Re: [Callers] Itty-bitty dances, triplets, odd numbers
Kalia, You said you already had a triplet with contra corners in it, BUT I figured I'd offer this anyway. I often call Chorus Jig as a triplet, (B2 being 1's (bal and) swing to bottom of set and others move up). I found that in a triplet dancers can learn contra corners very easily without the confusion that comes in a duple set. With Chorus Jig, in addition to the distinctive choreography you mentioned, there's also the historical significance of calling a dance 100's of years old I guess. bill > Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 12:53:53 -0700 > To: call...@sharedweight.net > Subject: [Callers] Itty-bitty dances, triplets, odd numbers > From: callers@lists.sharedweight.net > > I just called a tiny dance last night, and went through several of my > triplets along with a big pile of English 3-couple dances that we did to > old-time tunes (that was a little weird for me but the dancers enjoyed > them, so what the heck). I was grateful to have the few triplets I had, > and I'd like to expand my collection. The ones I used were > Microchasmic, David's Triplet #7 and Ted's Triplet #24, which all have > distinctive bits in them (contra corners, round two/drop through, and a > cast to invert then 1s lead up, respectively). I like triplets that > have some choreographic substance to them, something for the dancers to > chew on. > > Do you have favorites you enjoy dancing as well as calling? I get the > impression sometimes that triplets are "that thing you do to fill time > until the real dancing starts," but 3-couple sets can be a whole lot of > fun. And sometimes they can save your butt as a caller. > > We had lots of odd numbers last night, so in addition to the triplets > and 3-couple English dances I used dances like Domino 5 (5 dancers) and > Pride of Dingle (for 9). For a short while we had 4 couples and did > contras but most of the evening was "other." Got any good dances for > odd numbers? > > Kalia > ___ > Callers mailing list > Callers@lists.sharedweight.net > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
Re: [Callers] Itty-bitty dances, triplets, odd numbers
Though it may seem like heresy to do it without the associated tune, Levi Jackson Rag can be done to other thirty-two bar tunes if the band doesn't know the required tune, and is good for 5 couples. On May 3, 2015, at 12:53 PM, Kalia Kliban via Callers wrote: > I just called a tiny dance last night, and went through several of my > triplets along with a big pile of English 3-couple dances that we did to > old-time tunes (that was a little weird for me but the dancers enjoyed them, > so what the heck). I was grateful to have the few triplets I had, and I'd > like to expand my collection. The ones I used were Microchasmic, David's > Triplet #7 and Ted's Triplet #24, which all have distinctive bits in them > (contra corners, round two/drop through, and a cast to invert then 1s lead > up, respectively). I like triplets that have some choreographic substance to > them, something for the dancers to chew on. > > Do you have favorites you enjoy dancing as well as calling? I get the > impression sometimes that triplets are "that thing you do to fill time until > the real dancing starts," but 3-couple sets can be a whole lot of fun. And > sometimes they can save your butt as a caller. > > We had lots of odd numbers last night, so in addition to the triplets and > 3-couple English dances I used dances like Domino 5 (5 dancers) and Pride of > Dingle (for 9). For a short while we had 4 couples and did contras but most > of the evening was "other." Got any good dances for odd numbers? > > Kalia > ___ > Callers mailing list > Callers@lists.sharedweight.net > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
Re: [Callers] Itty-bitty dances, triplets, odd numbers
On 03/May/15 12:53, Kalia Kliban via Callers wrote: I just called a tiny dance last night, and went through several of my triplets along with a big pile of English 3-couple dances snip Hullo Kalia, I've called Mary Devlin's Triplet To Eugene a number of times. Looking over Triplet for Joyride again just now. I think I'll add that, as it has Actives turning _all_ Corners (your own and your partners.) http://www.mdevlin.com/dance/marys_dances.html I like Melanie's Triplet, by Melanie Axel-Lute, and Ted’s Triplet #7. Antony has a nice find-dance-by-formation search feature on his site http://www.heywood.nl/antony/dances/formations.php Michael's dance index site has a page for Formations. The legend is at the foot of the landing page. http://www.ibiblio.org/contradance/index/index.html I've been meaning to try out (real world test) Rick Mohr's Triplets 1 & 2 http://rickmohr.net/Contra/DancesByType.asp At the (late and lamented) Raincoast Ruckus Contra weekend (Vancouver, BC) a few years back Kathy Anderson had a session about dances for this purpose. Those for odd numbers of dancers or couples. Unfortunately the notes have gone adrift, however she might be amenable to a query. http://www.contradancelinks.com/callers.html I regularly mine the Ralph Page Legacy Weekend syllabi http://www.library.unh.edu/find/archives/collections/ralph-page-dance-legacy-weekend The index alone is worth the time visiting. Since I call for what might be considered a variety of dance forms, styles, types, I don't mind borrowing. Occasionally, when I think I'm being rather loose with that, it's amusing to find some of these dances have migrated back and forth quite some time ago. Shows, I guess, how there are more views of categorisation (or lack thereof) than what one hears right around one. Anyway, the point is, I think there are loads of really fun dances in the Ceilidh or eCeilidh (English Ceilidh) world. Many of them would appear to be step-hopped older country dances, or ones written In The Tradition. Australian Bush dances provide a few as well. Yes, a number are once-and-to-the-bottom. So I mine Thomas Green, John Brown, Peter Foster, & Brian Scowcroft's sites. http://barndances.org.uk/ http://www.ceilidhcalling.co.uk/ (seems to be temporarily goofed) http://pfoster.pcug.org.au/bushdanc/index.htm http://web.archive.org/web/20010708002003/www.scroft.demon.co.uk/CDance.html Just had a look in at Geoff Cubitt's site. He's got a lone, cute triplet in there. I'll have to go over the flow in and out of the final Stars to decide if I really like it. http://www.geoffcubitt.com/dances.htm Colin has amongst his on-line dances, some for 2, 3, 4, and 5 couples. http://colinhume.com/instruct.htm Peggy Roe in Vancouver, BC, wrote Triplicate a few years ago. It's an "ECD" piece for 3, longways (3 dancers in a line.) She used Corelli's Maggot, however one might try other music. It's setting, gypsy, turns, heys. Mellisa Binde wrote a few Odd Dances for SCD. I can't find them on-line however had saved the Spinster & The Polygamous Reel (the latter is kind of neat, a dance for one man and two women; in sets of five people.) I haven't danced them, just kept them about out of interest. When I hung out at the SCD class at the local Uni. a few years ago there were some months we'd pray for a sixth person or just dance five with a ghost anyway. The bulk of SCD dances are triple minor dances done in a four couple set. We'd do these without the fourth couple following the SCD pattern in this instance of the active couple "dropping to the bottom of the set" as the new 1s started, a rather untidy final progression I suppose. So, one might adapt any triple minor one likes for use with three couples (whether it be from ECD, SCD, or "ACD"/Contra.) Right, bed time. Cheers, John - two May Day Morris dance events done, one to go! -- J.D. Erskine Victoria, BC Island Dance - Folk & Country dance info - site & mail list http://members.shaw.ca/island.dance/