Re: [Caml-list] Incremental linking

2009-09-30 Thread Xavier Leroy

Dawid Toton wrote:

I have lot of modules and they are compiled to native code.
So I have .cmx and .o files and want to link them faster.
Is is possible to make linking an associative operation acting on modules?
[...]
Documentation of ld says that files produced with --relocatable can be 
used as intermediate partially linked files. Can something like this be 
done with object code produced by ocamlopt?


Yes.  ocamlopt -pack actually calls ld -r underneath to
consolidate several compilation units in a single .cmx/.o file.
ld -r will resolve references between these compilation units.

Gerd Stolpmann wrote:

Well, you can link several .cmx files (and their accompanying .o files)
to a .cmxa file (and an accompanying .a file): ocamlopt -a


From a linking standpoint, ocamlopt -a is equivalent to ar: it
does not resolve any references, just concatenates individual
.cmx/.o files in a single .cmxa/.a file.   That can still speed up
linking a bit, since reading one big .a file is faster than reading a
zillion small .o files.

Generally speaking, I'm somewhat surprised that linking time is an
issue for Dawid.  Modern Unix linkers are quite fast, and the
additional link-time work that OCaml does is small.  Let us know if
you manage to narrow the problem.

- Xavier Leroy

___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs


[Caml-list] Incremental linking

2009-09-29 Thread Dawid Toton

I have lot of modules and they are compiled to native code.
So I have .cmx and .o files and want to link them faster.

Is is possible to make linking an associative operation acting on modules?

I would like to do something like the following:
Knowing the correct partial order of modules (that compiler requires) I 
can create a tree that preserves that order. Leafs are modules. Other 
nodes of the tree correspond to a result of linking all descendant 
modules. Modules that are frequently recompiled are placed closer to the 
root. This way I expect to execute less linking operations during 
development.


Documentation of ld says that files produced with --relocatable can be 
used as intermediate partially linked files. Can something like this be 
done with object code produced by ocamlopt?
I don't know ocaml-specific details of linking, so maybe I overlook some 
obvoius obstacle?


Dawid

___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs


[Caml-list] Incremental linking

2009-09-29 Thread Dawid Toton

I have lot of modules and they are compiled to native code.
So I have .cmx and .o files and want to link them faster.

Is is possible to make linking an associative operation acting on modules?

I would like to do something like the following:
Knowing the correct partial order of modules (that compiler requires) I
can create a tree that preserves that order. Leafs are modules. Other
nodes of the tree correspond to a result of linking all descendant
modules. Modules that are frequently recompiled are placed closer to the
root. This way I expect to execute less linking operations during
development.

Documentation of ld says that files produced with --relocatable can be
used as intermediate partially linked files. Can something like this be
done with object code produced by ocamlopt?
I don't know ocaml-specific details of linking, so maybe I overlook some
obvoius obstacle?

Dawid

___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs


Re: [Caml-list] Incremental linking

2009-09-29 Thread Gerd Stolpmann

Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2009, 20:39 +0200 schrieb Dawid Toton:
 I have lot of modules and they are compiled to native code.
 So I have .cmx and .o files and want to link them faster.

Well, you can link several .cmx files (and their accompanying .o files)
to a .cmxa file (and an accompanying .a file): ocamlopt -a

You cannot do the same again on the next level, i.e. link
several .cmxa/.a together to get another .cmxa/.a. (I don't remember why
this restriction exists.)

Gerd

 
 Is is possible to make linking an associative operation acting on modules?
 
 I would like to do something like the following:
 Knowing the correct partial order of modules (that compiler requires) I
 can create a tree that preserves that order. Leafs are modules. Other
 nodes of the tree correspond to a result of linking all descendant
 modules. Modules that are frequently recompiled are placed closer to the
 root. This way I expect to execute less linking operations during
 development.
 
 Documentation of ld says that files produced with --relocatable can be
 used as intermediate partially linked files. Can something like this be
 done with object code produced by ocamlopt?
 I don't know ocaml-specific details of linking, so maybe I overlook some
 obvoius obstacle?
 
 Dawid
 
 ___
 Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
 http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
 Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
 Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
 Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
 
-- 

Gerd Stolpmann, Bad Nauheimer Str.3, 64289 Darmstadt,Germany 
g...@gerd-stolpmann.de  http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de
Phone: +49-6151-153855  Fax: +49-6151-997714


___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs