Re: [casper] pfb/fft confusion

2014-05-28 Thread Jay Brady

Great! That's what it seemed like it was doing, but I couldn't quite convince 
myself.  Thanks for the help.
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 15:16:06 -0400
Subject: Re: [casper] pfb/fft confusion
From: glenn.calt...@gmail.com
To: jay_br...@live.com
CC: casper@lists.berkeley.edu

Yes, i.e. if you set it to 2^2 then it means the PFB processes x0,x1,x2,x3 on 
the first FPGA clock, then x4,x5,x6,x7 on the second FPGA clock, etc...



On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Jay Brady  wrote:





So does simultaneous inputs refer to simultaneous samples (within one fpga 
clock) of a single physical input channel?
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 14:43:24 -0400
Subject: Re: [casper] pfb/fft confusion

From: glenn.calt...@gmail.com
To: jay_br...@live.com
CC: casper@lists.berkeley.edu


You want The PFB to have 2^0 simultaneous inputs, then make one PFB for each 
stream.



On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Jay Brady  wrote:





Hello all,
With all of the different pfb/fft blocks, I've gotten a bit confused. Some of 
the terminology used on the wiki is a bit unclear to me (simultaneous streams 
vs simultaneous inputs vs parallel time samples) which has led to this confusion


Anyway, I'm trying to build a spectrometer (a la tutorial 3) for the adc16x250, 
with the adc running 16 channel at 200 Msamp/s (so no demuxing). This gives me 
16 inputs that are fed into a pfb/fft block combo. I'm concerned that I am 
somehow getting those 16 inputs mixed up in the pfb or fft. 


Here are the blocks and parameters I'm using right now:pfb_fir_real with size: 
2^10, Taps: 4, Simultaneous Inputs: 2^2, and the Make Biplex box is not 
checked.fft_biplex_real_4x with size: 2^10 and Simultaneous Inputs 4^1.

This gives me 4 inputs/outputs on each of the blocks which are just wired 
straight through.

With this, the fft outputs seem ok-ish. I get a peak at the right frequency 
channel, but the sidelobe behavior is pretty terrible. I get high sidelobes 
that sometimes extend out 20-30 bins on either side of the main peak.


Any advice you can give would be great.
Jay Brady 



  

  

Re: [casper] pfb/fft confusion

2014-05-28 Thread G Jones
Yes, i.e. if you set it to 2^2 then it means the PFB processes x0,x1,x2,x3
on the first FPGA clock, then x4,x5,x6,x7 on the second FPGA clock, etc...


On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Jay Brady  wrote:

>
> So does simultaneous inputs refer to simultaneous samples (within one fpga
> clock) of a single physical input channel?
>
> --
> Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 14:43:24 -0400
> Subject: Re: [casper] pfb/fft confusion
> From: glenn.calt...@gmail.com
> To: jay_br...@live.com
> CC: casper@lists.berkeley.edu
>
>
> You want The PFB to have 2^0 simultaneous inputs, then make one PFB for
> each stream.
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Jay Brady  wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> With all of the different pfb/fft blocks, I've gotten a bit confused. Some
> of the terminology used on the wiki is a bit unclear to me (simultaneous
> streams vs simultaneous inputs vs parallel time samples) which has led to
> this confusion
>
> Anyway, I'm trying to build a spectrometer (a la tutorial 3) for the
> adc16x250, with the adc running 16 channel at 200 Msamp/s (so no demuxing).
> This gives me 16 inputs that are fed into a pfb/fft block combo. I'm
> concerned that I am somehow getting those 16 inputs mixed up in the pfb or
> fft.
>
> Here are the blocks and parameters I'm using right now:
> pfb_fir_real with size: 2^10, Taps: 4, Simultaneous Inputs: 2^2, and the
> Make Biplex box is not checked.
> fft_biplex_real_4x with size: 2^10 and Simultaneous Inputs 4^1.
> This gives me 4 inputs/outputs on each of the blocks which are just wired
> straight through.
>
>
> With this, the fft outputs seem ok-ish. I get a peak at the right
> frequency channel, but the sidelobe behavior is pretty terrible. I get high
> sidelobes that sometimes extend out 20-30 bins on either side of the main
> peak.
>
> Any advice you can give would be great.
>
> Jay Brady
>
>
>


Re: [casper] pfb/fft confusion

2014-05-28 Thread Jay Brady

So does simultaneous inputs refer to simultaneous samples (within one fpga 
clock) of a single physical input channel?
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 14:43:24 -0400
Subject: Re: [casper] pfb/fft confusion
From: glenn.calt...@gmail.com
To: jay_br...@live.com
CC: casper@lists.berkeley.edu

You want The PFB to have 2^0 simultaneous inputs, then make one PFB for each 
stream.



On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Jay Brady  wrote:




Hello all,
With all of the different pfb/fft blocks, I've gotten a bit confused. Some of 
the terminology used on the wiki is a bit unclear to me (simultaneous streams 
vs simultaneous inputs vs parallel time samples) which has led to this confusion

Anyway, I'm trying to build a spectrometer (a la tutorial 3) for the adc16x250, 
with the adc running 16 channel at 200 Msamp/s (so no demuxing). This gives me 
16 inputs that are fed into a pfb/fft block combo. I'm concerned that I am 
somehow getting those 16 inputs mixed up in the pfb or fft. 

Here are the blocks and parameters I'm using right now:pfb_fir_real with size: 
2^10, Taps: 4, Simultaneous Inputs: 2^2, and the Make Biplex box is not 
checked.fft_biplex_real_4x with size: 2^10 and Simultaneous Inputs 4^1.
This gives me 4 inputs/outputs on each of the blocks which are just wired 
straight through.

With this, the fft outputs seem ok-ish. I get a peak at the right frequency 
channel, but the sidelobe behavior is pretty terrible. I get high sidelobes 
that sometimes extend out 20-30 bins on either side of the main peak.

Any advice you can give would be great.
Jay Brady 


  

Re: [casper] pfb/fft confusion

2014-05-28 Thread G Jones
You want The PFB to have 2^0 simultaneous inputs, then make one PFB for
each stream.



On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Jay Brady  wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> With all of the different pfb/fft blocks, I've gotten a bit confused. Some
> of the terminology used on the wiki is a bit unclear to me (simultaneous
> streams vs simultaneous inputs vs parallel time samples) which has led to
> this confusion
>
> Anyway, I'm trying to build a spectrometer (a la tutorial 3) for the
> adc16x250, with the adc running 16 channel at 200 Msamp/s (so no demuxing).
> This gives me 16 inputs that are fed into a pfb/fft block combo. I'm
> concerned that I am somehow getting those 16 inputs mixed up in the pfb or
> fft.
>
> Here are the blocks and parameters I'm using right now:
> pfb_fir_real with size: 2^10, Taps: 4, Simultaneous Inputs: 2^2, and the
> Make Biplex box is not checked.
> fft_biplex_real_4x with size: 2^10 and Simultaneous Inputs 4^1.
> This gives me 4 inputs/outputs on each of the blocks which are just wired
> straight through.
>
>
> With this, the fft outputs seem ok-ish. I get a peak at the right
> frequency channel, but the sidelobe behavior is pretty terrible. I get high
> sidelobes that sometimes extend out 20-30 bins on either side of the main
> peak.
>
> Any advice you can give would be great.
>
> Jay Brady
>


[casper] pfb/fft confusion

2014-05-28 Thread Jay Brady
Hello all,
With all of the different pfb/fft blocks, I've gotten a bit confused. Some of 
the terminology used on the wiki is a bit unclear to me (simultaneous streams 
vs simultaneous inputs vs parallel time samples) which has led to this confusion
Anyway, I'm trying to build a spectrometer (a la tutorial 3) for the adc16x250, 
with the adc running 16 channel at 200 Msamp/s (so no demuxing). This gives me 
16 inputs that are fed into a pfb/fft block combo. I'm concerned that I am 
somehow getting those 16 inputs mixed up in the pfb or fft. 
Here are the blocks and parameters I'm using right now:pfb_fir_real with size: 
2^10, Taps: 4, Simultaneous Inputs: 2^2, and the Make Biplex box is not 
checked.fft_biplex_real_4x with size: 2^10 and Simultaneous Inputs 4^1.This 
gives me 4 inputs/outputs on each of the blocks which are just wired straight 
through.

With this, the fft outputs seem ok-ish. I get a peak at the right frequency 
channel, but the sidelobe behavior is pretty terrible. I get high sidelobes 
that sometimes extend out 20-30 bins on either side of the main peak.
Any advice you can give would be great.
Jay Brady