Re: [casper] CASPER 10 GbE yellow block
hi rich, we've transmitted 9.9 Gbit/sec on roach1, with the 10Gbe yellow block from the library about 4 months ago. i'm not sure if there have been revisions since then. best, dan On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Rich Lacasse wrote: > Hi All, > > Using the latest 10 GbE yellow block, has anyone achieved a sustained data > rate of greater than 8 Gb/s? > > Thanks, > Rich > >
Re: [casper] CASPER 10 GbE yellow block
Ok! Thanks! Nimish On Feb 13, 2013, at 6:10 PM, David MacMahon wrote: > Hi, Nimish, > > Sorry for my "10_Gbe_v2" typo. I meant "ten_Gbe_v2". There is no > "10_Gbe_v2" block. I am using the "ten_Gbe_v2" block for ROACH2. > > Dave > > On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Nimish Sane wrote: > >> Hi Dave and others, >> >> I was under the impression that "ten_Gbe_v2" was suppose to support ROACH2 >> as well. At least, its mask supports parameters specific to ROACH2 (such as >> choice between CX4, SFP+ and ports etc.). Rather, these options are >> available in the mask only for ROACH2. >> >> Is "10_Gbe_v2" part of SKA-SA github repository now and is that supposed to >> be used instead of "ten_Gbe_v2"? I have not updated the repository of late >> and have been using ten_Gbe_v2 for my ROACH2 design. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Nimish >> >> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:07 PM, David MacMahon >> wrote: >> Hi, John, >> >> My current work is on ROACH2 and the "10_Gbe_v2" block is the only 10 GbE >> block supported on ROACH2 so that's the one I'm currently designing with >> (but not yet using myself). I'm not sure which block Christopher used in >> the packet generator. His design ran on a ROACH so it could have been using >> the "ten_GbE" or "ten_Gbe_v2" block. >> >> Dave >> >> On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:01 PM, John Ford wrote: >> Hi, John, The benchmarking tests were done here by Christopher Schollar who was visiting from the University of Cape Town. I'm not sure which library version he used, but I can find out. >>> >>> It was mostly just curiosity on my part, but are you using the same blocks >>> for your work? >>> >>> John >>> >>> Dave On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:30 PM, John Ford wrote: >> Hi, Rich, >> >> We've sustained 9.9 Gpbs simultaneously from two 10 GbE ports (19.8 >> Gbps >> aggregate) on a ROACH into a PC with two 10 GbE NICs without dropping >> any >> packets. This was direct connect (i.e. no switch) and "transmit only" >> (i.e. no packets were sent back to the ROACH). >> > > Rich, Dave, can you tell us the versions of the libraries you have? > > Thanks! > > John > >> Hope this helps, >> Dave >> >> On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Rich Lacasse wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Using the latest 10 GbE yellow block, has anyone achieved a sustained >>> data rate of greater than 8 Gb/s? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Rich >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >>> >> >> >> >
Re: [casper] CASPER 10 GbE yellow block
Hi, Nimish, Sorry for my "10_Gbe_v2" typo. I meant "ten_Gbe_v2". There is no "10_Gbe_v2" block. I am using the "ten_Gbe_v2" block for ROACH2. Dave On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Nimish Sane wrote: > Hi Dave and others, > > I was under the impression that "ten_Gbe_v2" was suppose to support ROACH2 as > well. At least, its mask supports parameters specific to ROACH2 (such as > choice between CX4, SFP+ and ports etc.). Rather, these options are available > in the mask only for ROACH2. > > Is "10_Gbe_v2" part of SKA-SA github repository now and is that supposed to > be used instead of "ten_Gbe_v2"? I have not updated the repository of late > and have been using ten_Gbe_v2 for my ROACH2 design. > > Thanks, > > Nimish > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:07 PM, David MacMahon > wrote: > Hi, John, > > My current work is on ROACH2 and the "10_Gbe_v2" block is the only 10 GbE > block supported on ROACH2 so that's the one I'm currently designing with (but > not yet using myself). I'm not sure which block Christopher used in the > packet generator. His design ran on a ROACH so it could have been using the > "ten_GbE" or "ten_Gbe_v2" block. > > Dave > > On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:01 PM, John Ford wrote: > > >> Hi, John, > >> > >> The benchmarking tests were done here by Christopher Schollar who was > >> visiting from the University of Cape Town. I'm not sure which library > >> version he used, but I can find out. > > > > It was mostly just curiosity on my part, but are you using the same blocks > > for your work? > > > > John > > > > > >> > >> Dave > >> > >> On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:30 PM, John Ford wrote: > >> > Hi, Rich, > > We've sustained 9.9 Gpbs simultaneously from two 10 GbE ports (19.8 > Gbps > aggregate) on a ROACH into a PC with two 10 GbE NICs without dropping > any > packets. This was direct connect (i.e. no switch) and "transmit only" > (i.e. no packets were sent back to the ROACH). > > >>> > >>> Rich, Dave, can you tell us the versions of the libraries you have? > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> John > >>> > Hope this helps, > Dave > > On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Rich Lacasse wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Using the latest 10 GbE yellow block, has anyone achieved a sustained > > data rate of greater than 8 Gb/s? > > > > Thanks, > > Rich > > > > > > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
Re: [casper] CASPER 10 GbE yellow block
I think it's just a typo and ten_gbe_v2 == 10_gbe_v2 On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Nimish Sane wrote: > Hi Dave and others, > > I was under the impression that "ten_Gbe_v2" was suppose to support ROACH2 > as well. At least, its mask supports parameters specific to ROACH2 (such as > choice between CX4, SFP+ and ports etc.). Rather, these options are > available in the mask only for ROACH2. > > Is "10_Gbe_v2" part of SKA-SA github repository now and is that supposed to > be used instead of "ten_Gbe_v2"? I have not updated the repository of late > and have been using ten_Gbe_v2 for my ROACH2 design. > > Thanks, > > Nimish > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:07 PM, David MacMahon > wrote: >> >> Hi, John, >> >> My current work is on ROACH2 and the "10_Gbe_v2" block is the only 10 GbE >> block supported on ROACH2 so that's the one I'm currently designing with >> (but not yet using myself). I'm not sure which block Christopher used in >> the packet generator. His design ran on a ROACH so it could have been using >> the "ten_GbE" or "ten_Gbe_v2" block. >> >> Dave >> >> On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:01 PM, John Ford wrote: >> >> >> Hi, John, >> >> >> >> The benchmarking tests were done here by Christopher Schollar who was >> >> visiting from the University of Cape Town. I'm not sure which library >> >> version he used, but I can find out. >> > >> > It was mostly just curiosity on my part, but are you using the same >> > blocks >> > for your work? >> > >> > John >> > >> > >> >> >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:30 PM, John Ford wrote: >> >> >> Hi, Rich, >> >> We've sustained 9.9 Gpbs simultaneously from two 10 GbE ports (19.8 >> Gbps >> aggregate) on a ROACH into a PC with two 10 GbE NICs without dropping >> any >> packets. This was direct connect (i.e. no switch) and "transmit >> only" >> (i.e. no packets were sent back to the ROACH). >> >> >>> >> >>> Rich, Dave, can you tell us the versions of the libraries you have? >> >>> >> >>> Thanks! >> >>> >> >>> John >> >>> >> Hope this helps, >> Dave >> >> On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Rich Lacasse wrote: >> >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Using the latest 10 GbE yellow block, has anyone achieved a >> > sustained >> > data rate of greater than 8 Gb/s? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Rich >> > >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >
Re: [casper] CASPER 10 GbE yellow block
Hi Dave and others, I was under the impression that "ten_Gbe_v2" was suppose to support ROACH2 as well. At least, its mask supports parameters specific to ROACH2 (such as choice between CX4, SFP+ and ports etc.). Rather, these options are available in the mask only for ROACH2. Is "10_Gbe_v2" part of SKA-SA github repository now and is that supposed to be used instead of "ten_Gbe_v2"? I have not updated the repository of late and have been using ten_Gbe_v2 for my ROACH2 design. Thanks, Nimish On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:07 PM, David MacMahon wrote: > Hi, John, > > My current work is on ROACH2 and the "10_Gbe_v2" block is the only 10 GbE > block supported on ROACH2 so that's the one I'm currently designing with > (but not yet using myself). I'm not sure which block Christopher used in > the packet generator. His design ran on a ROACH so it could have been > using the "ten_GbE" or "ten_Gbe_v2" block. > > Dave > > On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:01 PM, John Ford wrote: > > >> Hi, John, > >> > >> The benchmarking tests were done here by Christopher Schollar who was > >> visiting from the University of Cape Town. I'm not sure which library > >> version he used, but I can find out. > > > > It was mostly just curiosity on my part, but are you using the same > blocks > > for your work? > > > > John > > > > > >> > >> Dave > >> > >> On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:30 PM, John Ford wrote: > >> > Hi, Rich, > > We've sustained 9.9 Gpbs simultaneously from two 10 GbE ports (19.8 > Gbps > aggregate) on a ROACH into a PC with two 10 GbE NICs without dropping > any > packets. This was direct connect (i.e. no switch) and "transmit only" > (i.e. no packets were sent back to the ROACH). > > >>> > >>> Rich, Dave, can you tell us the versions of the libraries you have? > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> John > >>> > Hope this helps, > Dave > > On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Rich Lacasse wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Using the latest 10 GbE yellow block, has anyone achieved a sustained > > data rate of greater than 8 Gb/s? > > > > Thanks, > > Rich > > > > > > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
Re: [casper] CASPER 10 GbE yellow block
Hi, John, My current work is on ROACH2 and the "10_Gbe_v2" block is the only 10 GbE block supported on ROACH2 so that's the one I'm currently designing with (but not yet using myself). I'm not sure which block Christopher used in the packet generator. His design ran on a ROACH so it could have been using the "ten_GbE" or "ten_Gbe_v2" block. Dave On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:01 PM, John Ford wrote: >> Hi, John, >> >> The benchmarking tests were done here by Christopher Schollar who was >> visiting from the University of Cape Town. I'm not sure which library >> version he used, but I can find out. > > It was mostly just curiosity on my part, but are you using the same blocks > for your work? > > John > > >> >> Dave >> >> On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:30 PM, John Ford wrote: >> Hi, Rich, We've sustained 9.9 Gpbs simultaneously from two 10 GbE ports (19.8 Gbps aggregate) on a ROACH into a PC with two 10 GbE NICs without dropping any packets. This was direct connect (i.e. no switch) and "transmit only" (i.e. no packets were sent back to the ROACH). >>> >>> Rich, Dave, can you tell us the versions of the libraries you have? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> John >>> Hope this helps, Dave On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Rich Lacasse wrote: > Hi All, > > Using the latest 10 GbE yellow block, has anyone achieved a sustained > data rate of greater than 8 Gb/s? > > Thanks, > Rich > >>> >>> >> >> > >
Re: [casper] CASPER 10 GbE yellow block
> Hi, John, > > The benchmarking tests were done here by Christopher Schollar who was > visiting from the University of Cape Town. I'm not sure which library > version he used, but I can find out. It was mostly just curiosity on my part, but are you using the same blocks for your work? John > > Dave > > On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:30 PM, John Ford wrote: > >>> Hi, Rich, >>> >>> We've sustained 9.9 Gpbs simultaneously from two 10 GbE ports (19.8 >>> Gbps >>> aggregate) on a ROACH into a PC with two 10 GbE NICs without dropping >>> any >>> packets. This was direct connect (i.e. no switch) and "transmit only" >>> (i.e. no packets were sent back to the ROACH). >>> >> >> Rich, Dave, can you tell us the versions of the libraries you have? >> >> Thanks! >> >> John >> >>> Hope this helps, >>> Dave >>> >>> On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Rich Lacasse wrote: >>> Hi All, Using the latest 10 GbE yellow block, has anyone achieved a sustained data rate of greater than 8 Gb/s? Thanks, Rich >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Re: [casper] CASPER 10 GbE yellow block
Hi, John, The benchmarking tests were done here by Christopher Schollar who was visiting from the University of Cape Town. I'm not sure which library version he used, but I can find out. Dave On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:30 PM, John Ford wrote: >> Hi, Rich, >> >> We've sustained 9.9 Gpbs simultaneously from two 10 GbE ports (19.8 Gbps >> aggregate) on a ROACH into a PC with two 10 GbE NICs without dropping any >> packets. This was direct connect (i.e. no switch) and "transmit only" >> (i.e. no packets were sent back to the ROACH). >> > > Rich, Dave, can you tell us the versions of the libraries you have? > > Thanks! > > John > >> Hope this helps, >> Dave >> >> On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Rich Lacasse wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Using the latest 10 GbE yellow block, has anyone achieved a sustained >>> data rate of greater than 8 Gb/s? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Rich >>> >> >> >> > >
Re: [casper] CASPER 10 GbE yellow block
> Hi, Rich, > > We've sustained 9.9 Gpbs simultaneously from two 10 GbE ports (19.8 Gbps > aggregate) on a ROACH into a PC with two 10 GbE NICs without dropping any > packets. This was direct connect (i.e. no switch) and "transmit only" > (i.e. no packets were sent back to the ROACH). > Rich, Dave, can you tell us the versions of the libraries you have? Thanks! John > Hope this helps, > Dave > > On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Rich Lacasse wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Using the latest 10 GbE yellow block, has anyone achieved a sustained >> data rate of greater than 8 Gb/s? >> >> Thanks, >> Rich >> > > >
Re: [casper] CASPER 10 GbE yellow block
Hi, Rich, We've sustained 9.9 Gpbs simultaneously from two 10 GbE ports (19.8 Gbps aggregate) on a ROACH into a PC with two 10 GbE NICs without dropping any packets. This was direct connect (i.e. no switch) and "transmit only" (i.e. no packets were sent back to the ROACH). Hope this helps, Dave On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Rich Lacasse wrote: > Hi All, > > Using the latest 10 GbE yellow block, has anyone achieved a sustained data > rate of greater than 8 Gb/s? > > Thanks, > Rich >
