[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 3A - Sip Registration on 7960...

[Alex Hannah]

Guys,

I have CME 7x loaded on a 2811 here in my lab.  I am attaching the config to
this email.  I have placed the SIP firmware for a 7960 on the flash, added
the necessary commands into the TFTP-Server command and I have followed Lab
3A fairly closely.  I am still recieving "Registration Rejected" message on
the phone, dispite having VLan, IP, and Firmware info.  I do get "Version
Error" as well.

The only events I see on the router as below, I get no debug ccsip messages
only TFTP events.

BR2-2811-RTR#
Sep 29 05:40:22.939: TFTP: Looking for CTLSEP00131A8C26F9.tlv
Sep 29 05:40:22.963: TFTP: Looking for SEP00131A8C26F9.cnf.xml
Sep 29 05:40:22.987: TFTP: Looking for SIP00131A8C26F9.cnf
Sep 29 05:40:23.015: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP00131A8C26F9.cnf, fd 7, size
1220 for process 3
Sep 29 05:40:23.023: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP00131A8C26F9.cnf, time
00:00:00 for process 3
Sep 29 05:40:23.059: TFTP: Looking for P003-8-12-00.loads
Sep 29 05:40:23.743: TFTP: Looking for P003-8-12-00.sbn
Sep 29 05:40:32.500: TFTP: Looking for CTLSEP00131A8C26F9.tlv
Sep 29 05:40:32.640: TFTP: Looking for SEP00131A8C26F9.cnf.xml
Sep 29 05:40:32.724: TFTP: Looking for XMLDefault.cnf.xml
Sep 29 05:40:32.724: TFTP: Opened system:/its/vrf1/XMLDefault.cnf.xml, fd 7,
size 2750 for process 3
Sep 29 05:40:32.744: TFTP: Finished system:/its/vrf1/XMLDefault.cnf.xml,
time 00:00:00 for process 3
Sep 29 05:40:32.960: %IPPHONE-6-REG_ALARM: 25: Name=SEP00131A8C26F9
Load=8.0(9.0) Last=Initialized
BR2-2811-RTR#

Any thoughts?

Thanks,

Alex
BR2-2811-RTR#sh run
Building configuration...


Current configuration : 6812 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 11:39:12 CEDT Tue Sep 29 2009
! NVRAM config last updated at 11:17:45 CEDT Tue Sep 29 2009
!
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname BR2-2811-RTR
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
card type e1 0 2
logging message-counter syslog
!
no aaa new-model
clock timezone CET 5
clock summer-time CEDT recurring
network-clock-participate wic 2 
network-clock-select 1 E1 0/2/0
!
dot11 syslog
ip source-route
!
!
ip cef
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.99
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.200 10.10.202.254
!
ip dhcp pool CME
   network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
   option 150 ip 172.20.102.1 
   default-router 10.10.202.1 
!
!
no ip domain lookup
no ipv6 cef
!
multilink bundle-name authenticated
!
!
! 
!
isdn switch-type primary-net5
!
!
!
voice service voip 
 sip
  bind control source-interface Loopback0
  bind media source-interface Loopback0
  registrar server expires max 600 min 60
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! 
!
voice register global
 mode cme
 source-address 10.10.202.1 port 5060
 timeouts interdigit 7
 max-dn 100
 max-pool 2
 load 7960-7940 P003-8-12-00
 authenticate register
 tftp-path flash:
 create profile sync 0004571323532824
!
voice register dn  1
 number 3006
!
voice register pool  1
 id mac 0013.1A8C.26F9
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 1
 dtmf-relay sip-notify
 description 3214-3006
 codec g711ulaw
! 
!
!
voice-card 0
!
!
!
!
!
archive
 log config
  hidekeys
! 
!
!
!
!
controller E1 0/2/0
!
!
!
!
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 172.20.102.1 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf network point-to-point
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
 description Trunk uplink to 3550 BR2 Switch
 no ip address
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.200
 encapsulation dot1Q 200
 ip address 10.10.102.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.400
 encapsulation dot1Q 400
 ip address 10.10.202.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
 description Uplink to Mgmt Network port 18 3550
 ip address 10.99.99.4 255.255.255.0
 no ip redirects
 no ip unreachables
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
interface Serial0/3/0
 description FRAME Relay to Cloud
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF
 no fair-queue
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface Serial0/3/0.1 point-to-point
 ip address 10.10.112.2 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf mtu-ignore
 snmp trap link-status
 frame-relay interface-dlci 300   
!
interface Service-Engine1/0
 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0.400
 service-module ip address 10.10.202.254 255.255.255.0
 service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.202.1
!
router ospf 1
 log-adjacency-changes
 network 10.10.102.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
 network 10.10.112.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
 network 10.10.202.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
 network 172.20.102.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
!
ip forward-protocol nd
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.112.1
ip route 10.10.202.254 255.255.255.255 Service-Engine1/0
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip http path flash:
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
tftp-server flash:P00308000500.tar
tftp-server flash:P00405000700.bin
tftp-server flash:apps41.8-5-2TH1-9.sbn
tftp-server flash:cnu41.8-5-2TH1-9.sbn
tftp-server flash:jar41sip.8-5-2TH1-9.sbn
tftp-server flash:SIP41.8-5-2S.loads
tftp-server flash:term41.default.loads
tftp-server flash:P0S3-8-12-00.loads
tftp-server flash:P0S3-8-12-00.sb2
tftp-server flash:P0

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

[Michael Ciarfello]

I am not an RSVP debug expert, but I think this is what's getting you.  There 
should also be a LOT more output.
Do you have ip rsvp command on all interfaces in the path?  Bandwidth on the 
WAN interfaces you want to subtract from.

Sep 30 04:34:03.166: RSVP-MSG: 10.10.101.1 _17284->10.10.200.3 _17888[0.0.0.0]: 
no matching path state for Resv

From: Aamir Panjwani [aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:49 AM
To: Michael Ciarfello; Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

Please see attached output of “debug ip rsvp all” from HQ and BR1 side

Test call was made from HQ to BR1

From: Michael Ciarfello [mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 2:25 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

Do you get output if do debug ip rsvp all?


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani 
[aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:22 AM
To: Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work
Yep all registered in their own MRG/MRGL….location bandwidth resync didn’t make 
any difference.

Restarted CCM service too…..only thing left is to reboot the gateways

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 1:48 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

So they’re all registered.

Each of them is in their own MRG, etc.

Did you do a resync bandwidth after making any Location changes?

From: Aamir Panjwani [mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:13 PM
To: Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

show sccp output below

HQ

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE
Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000
TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1
Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A
Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60
Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization 
Period: 30
RSVP : ENABLED

BR1

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE
Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000
TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1
Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A
Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60
Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization 
Period: 30
RSVP : ENABLED




From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 1:11 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

What’s show sccp tell you at both routers?

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this time not 
sure what’s happening it just won’t work. I get “not enough bandwidth” on the 
phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn’t pickup anything obvious.


1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on both MGCP 
gateways

2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even if I set 
the bandwidth to 400 it won’t work

3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location configured and assigned to 
respective device pools

4)  RSVP location set to “mandatory” between HQ and BR1. Video bandwidth 
set to none.

5)  Have done no sccp/sccp, no mgcp/mgcp few times

6)  Have tried configuring ip rsvp bandwidth on physical and sub interfaces

7)  Reset MRGL, phones etc

sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0.130
sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 2 version 7.0
sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 1 version 7.0
sccp
!
sccp ccm group 1
 bind interface GigabitEthernet0/0.102
 associate ccm 1 priority 1
 associate ccm 2 priority 2
 associate profile 1 register HQ-RSVP
!
dspfarm profile 1 mtp
 codec pass-through
 codec g729r8
 rsvp
 maximum sessions software 4
 associate application SCCP

*

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

[Aamir Panjwani]

Please see attached output of "debug ip rsvp all" from HQ and BR1 side

 

Test call was made from HQ to BR1

 

From: Michael Ciarfello [mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 2:25 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

Do you get output if do debug ip rsvp all?

 



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
[aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:22 AM
To: Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

Yep all registered in their own MRG/MRGLlocation bandwidth resync
didn't make any difference.

 

Restarted CCM service too.only thing left is to reboot the gateways

 

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 1:48 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

So they're all registered.

 

Each of them is in their own MRG, etc.

 

Did you do a resync bandwidth after making any Location changes?

 

From: Aamir Panjwani [mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:13 PM
To: Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

show sccp output below

 

HQ

 

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE

Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000

TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1

Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0

Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A

Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum
Packetization Period: 30

RSVP : ENABLED

 

BR1

 

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE

Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000

TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1

Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0

Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A

Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum
Packetization Period: 30

RSVP : ENABLED

 

 

 

 

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 1:11 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

What's show sccp tell you at both routers?

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir
Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this
time not sure what's happening it just won't work. I get "not enough
bandwidth" on the phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn't
pickup anything obvious. 

 

1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on
both MGCP gateways

2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even
if I set the bandwidth to 400 it won't work

3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location configured and assigned to
respective device pools

4)  RSVP location set to "mandatory" between HQ and BR1. Video
bandwidth set to none.

5)  Have done no sccp/sccp, no mgcp/mgcp few times

6)  Have tried configuring ip rsvp bandwidth on physical and sub
interfaces

7)  Reset MRGL, phones etc

 

sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0.130

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface GigabitEthernet0/0.102

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register HQ-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

*

 

sccp local Vlan230

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface Vlan230

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register BR1-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

 


__
This email has b

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vpim

[Nara Shikamaru]

>>
>> > Frustrating.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Michael Ciarfello <
>> mciarfe...@iplogic.com
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >>  No, you have to buy it.  And I don't think it comes with the Cisco
>> demo
>> >> licenses you can get from the web site.  Haven't tried to confirm.  The
>> text
>> >> on the web page where it says to enter your MAC address doesn't
>> indicate
>> >> VPIM is included.
>> >>
>> >> The good news it, VPIM for UC is MUCH cheaper than it was for Unity.
>>  But
>> >> Unity demo came with VPIM, right?  OH well.
>> >>  --
>> >> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
>> >> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
>> >> shikam...@kagadis.com]
>> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:09 PM
>> >> *To:* OSL Group
>> >> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and
>> demo
>> >> license?
>> >>
>> >>  VPIM doesn't seem to be installable under the CUC demo license (I get
>> an
>> >> error saying that the VPIM location can not be added because of a
>> license
>> >> restriction.)  Is there a work around for home labbers?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> -Shikamaru
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > -Shikamaru
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Shikamaru
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/a367727e/attachment-0001.htm
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:10:33 -0400
>> From: "Mike Thompson" 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work
>> To: "'Aamir Panjwani'" ,
>>
>> Message-ID: <014701ca417b$93b58490$bb208d...@com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> What's show sccp tell you at both routers?
>>
>>
>>
>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir
>> Panjwani
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work
>>
>>
>>
>> I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this time
>> not sure what's happening it just won't work. I get "not enough bandwidth"
>> on the phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn't pickup
>> anything
>> obvious.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on both
>> MGCP gateways
>>
>> 2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even if
>> I
>> set the bandwidth to 400 it won't work
>>
>> 3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location configured and assigned to
>> respective device pools
>>
>> 4)  RSVP location set to "mandatory" between HQ and BR1. Video
>> bandwidth
>> set to none.
>>
>> 5)  Have done no sccp/sccp, no mgcp/mgcp few times
>>
>> 6)  Have tried configuring ip rsvp bandwidth on physical and sub
>> interfaces
>>
>> 7)  Reset MRGL, phones etc
>>
>>
>>
>> sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0.130
>>
>> sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 2 version 7.0
>>
>> sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 1 version 7.0
>>
>> sccp
>>
>> !
>>
>> sccp ccm group 1
>>
>>  bind interface GigabitEthernet0/0.102
>>
>>  associate ccm 1 priority 1
>>
>>  associate ccm 2 priority 2
>>
>>  associate profile 1 register HQ-RSVP
>>
>> !
>>
>> dspfarm profile 1 mtp
>>
>>  codec pass-through
>>
>>  codec g729r8
>>
>>  rsvp
>>
>>  maximum sessions software 4
>>
>>  associate application SCCP
>>
>>
>>
>> *
>>
>>
>>
>> sccp local Vlan230
>>
>> sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 1 version 7.0
>>
>> sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 2 version 7.0
>>
>> sccp
>>
>> !
>>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

[Michael Ciarfello]

Do you get output if do debug ip rsvp all?


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani 
[aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:22 AM
To: Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

Yep all registered in their own MRG/MRGL….location bandwidth resync didn’t make 
any difference.

Restarted CCM service too…..only thing left is to reboot the gateways

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 1:48 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

So they’re all registered.

Each of them is in their own MRG, etc.

Did you do a resync bandwidth after making any Location changes?

From: Aamir Panjwani [mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:13 PM
To: Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

show sccp output below

HQ

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE
Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000
TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1
Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A
Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60
Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization 
Period: 30
RSVP : ENABLED

BR1

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE
Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000
TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1
Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A
Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60
Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization 
Period: 30
RSVP : ENABLED




From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 1:11 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

What’s show sccp tell you at both routers?

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this time not 
sure what’s happening it just won’t work. I get “not enough bandwidth” on the 
phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn’t pickup anything obvious.


1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on both MGCP 
gateways

2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even if I set 
the bandwidth to 400 it won’t work

3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location configured and assigned to 
respective device pools

4)  RSVP location set to “mandatory” between HQ and BR1. Video bandwidth 
set to none.

5)  Have done no sccp/sccp, no mgcp/mgcp few times

6)  Have tried configuring ip rsvp bandwidth on physical and sub interfaces

7)  Reset MRGL, phones etc

sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0.130
sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 2 version 7.0
sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 1 version 7.0
sccp
!
sccp ccm group 1
 bind interface GigabitEthernet0/0.102
 associate ccm 1 priority 1
 associate ccm 2 priority 2
 associate profile 1 register HQ-RSVP
!
dspfarm profile 1 mtp
 codec pass-through
 codec g729r8
 rsvp
 maximum sessions software 4
 associate application SCCP

*

sccp local Vlan230
sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 1 version 7.0
sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 2 version 7.0
sccp
!
sccp ccm group 1
 bind interface Vlan230
 associate ccm 1 priority 1
 associate ccm 2 priority 2
 associate profile 1 register BR1-RSVP
!
dspfarm profile 1 mtp
 codec pass-through
 codec g729r8
 rsvp
 maximum sessions software 4
 associate application SCCP



__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vpim

[Michael Ciarfello]

---
>> *From:* 
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
>>  [
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>]
>>  On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
>> shikam...@kagadis.com<mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com>]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:09 PM
>> *To:* OSL Group
>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo
>> license?
>>
>>  VPIM doesn't seem to be installable under the CUC demo license (I get an
>> error saying that the VPIM location can not be added because of a license
>> restriction.)  Is there a work around for home labbers?
>>
>> --
>> -Shikamaru
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
>



--
-Shikamaru
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/a367727e/attachment-0001.htm

--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:10:33 -0400
From: "Mike Thompson" mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work
To: "'Aamir Panjwani'" 
mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au>>,
   mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>>
Message-ID: <014701ca417b$93b58490$bb208d...@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

What's show sccp tell you at both routers?



From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>]
 On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work



I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this time
not sure what's happening it just won't work. I get "not enough bandwidth"
on the phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn't pickup anything
obvious.



1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on both
MGCP gateways

2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even if I
set the bandwidth to 400 it won't work

3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location configured and assigned to
respective device pools

4)  RSVP location set to "mandatory" between HQ and BR1. Video bandwidth
set to none.

5)  Have done no sccp/sccp, no mgcp/mgcp few times

6)  Have tried configuring ip rsvp bandwidth on physical and sub
interfaces

7)  Reset MRGL, phones etc



sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0.130

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 2 version 7.0

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 1 version 7.0

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface GigabitEthernet0/0.102

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register HQ-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP



*



sccp local Vlan230

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 1 version 7.0

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 2 version 7.0

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface Vlan230

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register BR1-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP






__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/6d9d132d/attachment-0001.htm

--

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:13:09 +1000
From: "Aamir Panjwani" 
mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au>>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work
To: "Mike Thompson" mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com>>,
   mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>>
Message-ID:
   
<08c206e16f5fb2438def1714f3f1b93bb53...@syd-ad-02.internal.unify.net.au<mailto:08c206e16f5fb2438def1714f3f1b93bb53...@syd-ad-02.internal.unify.net.au>>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

show sccp output below



HQ



MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE

Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000

TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1

Reported Max Streams:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

[Aamir Panjwani]

Yep all registered in their own MRG/MRGLlocation bandwidth resync
didn't make any difference.

 

Restarted CCM service too.only thing left is to reboot the gateways

 

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 1:48 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

So they're all registered.

 

Each of them is in their own MRG, etc.

 

Did you do a resync bandwidth after making any Location changes?

 

From: Aamir Panjwani [mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:13 PM
To: Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

show sccp output below

 

HQ

 

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE

Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000

TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1

Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0

Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A

Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum
Packetization Period: 30

RSVP : ENABLED

 

BR1

 

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE

Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000

TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1

Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0

Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A

Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum
Packetization Period: 30

RSVP : ENABLED

 

 

 

 

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 1:11 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

What's show sccp tell you at both routers?

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir
Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this
time not sure what's happening it just won't work. I get "not enough
bandwidth" on the phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn't
pickup anything obvious. 

 

1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on
both MGCP gateways

2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even
if I set the bandwidth to 400 it won't work

3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location configured and assigned to
respective device pools

4)  RSVP location set to "mandatory" between HQ and BR1. Video
bandwidth set to none.

5)  Have done no sccp/sccp, no mgcp/mgcp few times

6)  Have tried configuring ip rsvp bandwidth on physical and sub
interfaces

7)  Reset MRGL, phones etc

 

sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0.130

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface GigabitEthernet0/0.102

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register HQ-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

*

 

sccp local Vlan230

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface Vlan230

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register BR1-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vpim

[Nara Shikamaru]

Yes, I agree, VPIM looks simple - would have been nice to see it in action
with the demo license.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Michael Ciarfello
wrote:

> I think that's a little too detailed there buddy.
> Please refrain from hints like that.  It makes the test HARDER.
>
> VPIM takes 5 minutes.  Study it. You might use it someday.
>
> 
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Brett Hillman [
> bghill...@ventech.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:21 PM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vpim
>
> I would not spend any time on this. The voice mail I saw was very basic. I
> would work hard on plus dialing and qos and srst. Would know mobility and
> snr basics.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com <
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
> Sent: Tue Sep 29 22:14:25 2009
> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 43, Issue 194
>
> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo   license?
>  (Nara Shikamaru)
>   2. Re: vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work (Mike Thompson)
>   3. Re: vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work (Aamir Panjwani)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:05:01 -0700
> From: Nara Shikamaru 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and
>demolicense?
> To: Michael Ciarfello , OSL Group
>
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Frustrating.
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Nara Shikamaru  >wrote:
>
> > Frustrating.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Michael Ciarfello <
> mciarfe...@iplogic.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>  No, you have to buy it.  And I don't think it comes with the Cisco demo
> >> licenses you can get from the web site.  Haven't tried to confirm.  The
> text
> >> on the web page where it says to enter your MAC address doesn't indicate
> >> VPIM is included.
> >>
> >> The good news it, VPIM for UC is MUCH cheaper than it was for Unity.
>  But
> >> Unity demo came with VPIM, right?  OH well.
> >>  --
> >> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
> >> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
> >> shikam...@kagadis.com]
> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:09 PM
> >> *To:* OSL Group
> >> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and
> demo
> >> license?
> >>
> >>  VPIM doesn't seem to be installable under the CUC demo license (I get
> an
> >> error saying that the VPIM location can not be added because of a
> license
> >> restriction.)  Is there a work around for home labbers?
> >>
> >> --
> >> -Shikamaru
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Shikamaru
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/a367727e/attachment-0001.htm
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:10:33 -0400
> From: "Mike Thompson" 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work
> To: "'Aamir Panjwani'" ,
>
> Message-ID: <014701ca417b$93b58490$bb208d...@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> What's show sccp tell you at both routers?
>
>
>
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir
> Panjwani
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subj

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vpim

[Nara Shikamaru]

Frankly, the only thing I worry about is having to go through a lot of
nonsense to gain a feature in my lab set up.  It takes time and energy away
from training.  The smartest move Cisco made in their training cirriculum,
by far, is opening the platforms up to be easily set up in a lab for
training and testing.  I'd hate for them to start testing on features that
aren't included with the demo license.

I suspect VPIM was included because it was part of the first set of mock
labs that came out before the v3 testing started in July.  We still have 5
more mock labs to go to round out the 10 total that are going to be
available.  The last 5 may be a more accurate reflection of the material
needing specific attention.  I'm going to use the last 3 months before my
lab date focusing on mock labs 6 7 8 9 and 10.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Brett Hillman wrote:

> I would not spend any time on this. The voice mail I saw was very basic. I
> would work hard on plus dialing and qos and srst. Would know mobility and
> snr basics.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com <
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
> Sent: Tue Sep 29 22:14:25 2009
> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 43, Issue 194
>
> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo   license?
>  (Nara Shikamaru)
>   2. Re: vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work (Mike Thompson)
>   3. Re: vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work (Aamir Panjwani)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:05:01 -0700
> From: Nara Shikamaru 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and
>demolicense?
> To: Michael Ciarfello , OSL Group
>
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Frustrating.
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Nara Shikamaru  >wrote:
>
> > Frustrating.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Michael Ciarfello <
> mciarfe...@iplogic.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>  No, you have to buy it.  And I don't think it comes with the Cisco demo
> >> licenses you can get from the web site.  Haven't tried to confirm.  The
> text
> >> on the web page where it says to enter your MAC address doesn't indicate
> >> VPIM is included.
> >>
> >> The good news it, VPIM for UC is MUCH cheaper than it was for Unity.
>  But
> >> Unity demo came with VPIM, right?  OH well.
> >>  --
> >> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
> >> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
> >> shikam...@kagadis.com]
> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:09 PM
> >> *To:* OSL Group
> >> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and
> demo
> >> license?
> >>
> >>  VPIM doesn't seem to be installable under the CUC demo license (I get
> an
> >> error saying that the VPIM location can not be added because of a
> license
> >> restriction.)  Is there a work around for home labbers?
> >>
> >> --
> >> -Shikamaru
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Shikamaru
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/a367727e/attachment-0001.htm
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:10:33 -0400
> From: "Mike Thompson" 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work
> To: "'Aamir Panjwani'" ,
>
> Message-ID: <014701ca417b$93b58490$bb208d...@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> What's show sccp tell you at both routers?
>
>
>
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylis

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vpim

[Michael Ciarfello]

I think that's a little too detailed there buddy.
Please refrain from hints like that.  It makes the test HARDER.

VPIM takes 5 minutes.  Study it. You might use it someday.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Brett Hillman 
[bghill...@ventech.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:21 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vpim

I would not spend any time on this. The voice mail I saw was very basic. I 
would work hard on plus dialing and qos and srst. Would know mobility and snr 
basics.

- Original Message -
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 

To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
Sent: Tue Sep 29 22:14:25 2009
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 43, Issue 194

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo   license?
  (Nara Shikamaru)
   2. Re: vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work (Mike Thompson)
   3. Re: vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work (Aamir Panjwani)


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:05:01 -0700
From: Nara Shikamaru 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and
demolicense?
To: Michael Ciarfello , OSL Group

Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Frustrating.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Nara Shikamaru wrote:

> Frustrating.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Michael Ciarfello  > wrote:
>
>>  No, you have to buy it.  And I don't think it comes with the Cisco demo
>> licenses you can get from the web site.  Haven't tried to confirm.  The text
>> on the web page where it says to enter your MAC address doesn't indicate
>> VPIM is included.
>>
>> The good news it, VPIM for UC is MUCH cheaper than it was for Unity.  But
>> Unity demo came with VPIM, right?  OH well.
>>  --
>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
>> shikam...@kagadis.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:09 PM
>> *To:* OSL Group
>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo
>> license?
>>
>>  VPIM doesn't seem to be installable under the CUC demo license (I get an
>> error saying that the VPIM location can not be added because of a license
>> restriction.)  Is there a work around for home labbers?
>>
>> --
>> -Shikamaru
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
>



--
-Shikamaru
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/a367727e/attachment-0001.htm

--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:10:33 -0400
From: "Mike Thompson" 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work
To: "'Aamir Panjwani'" ,

Message-ID: <014701ca417b$93b58490$bb208d...@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

What's show sccp tell you at both routers?



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work



I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this time
not sure what's happening it just won't work. I get "not enough bandwidth"
on the phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn't pickup anything
obvious.



1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on both
MGCP gateways

2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even if I
set the bandwidth to 400 it won't work

3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location configured and assigned to
respective device pools

4)  RSVP location set to "mandatory" between HQ and BR1. Video bandwidth
set to none.

5)  Have done no sccp/sccp, no mgcp/mgcp few times

6)  Have tried configuring ip rsvp bandwidth on physical and sub
interfaces

7)

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 3 - 7960s display "PhoneUnprovisioned"

[Jeff Garvas]

What about the log in the phone?   I've found CTL / tftp denied issues this
way.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA <
jeffrey.gir...@us.army.mil> wrote:

> BK -
>Thanks for the reply...
>
>No joy
>
>I had already tried what you had suggested - but I did it again
> anyway.  Same result.
>
>Phone shows "Phone Unprovisioned" and the debug tftp events
> cycles between "Looking for SIPx.cnf", "Opened flash:/SIPxxx.cnf",
> and Finished flash:/"SIPxxx.cnf"  then repeat the cycle.
>
>Anyone else?
>
> Jeff
>
> ---
> Jeffrey T. Girard ("Jeff")
> COL, 53
> Future Forces Integration Directorate (FFID), Deputy - Networks
> office:  (915)568-1240  DSN 978
> Mobile:  (915)727-4222
> reply to:  jeffrey.gir...@us.army.mil
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
> bkvalent...@gmail.com
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 5:58 PM
> To: Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com;
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 3 - 7960s display
> "PhoneUnprovisioned"
>
> Er ah...
>
> create profile (not create cnf-files)
>
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bkvalent...@gmail.com
>
> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:47:09
> To: Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA;
> ;
> 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 3 - 7960s display "Phone
> Unprovisioned"
>
>
> At first glance, it seems okay to me.
>
> Try shutting down the switchports connecting the phones.  Then go into
> voice register global and do "no create profile".  The check flash to
> make sure you don't have rogue SIP.cnf files.  If you find
> any, delete them.
>
> Then go back to voice register global and do "create cnf files".  Then
> do a no shut on the switchports connecting the phones.
>
>
>
>
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA" 
>
> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:26:42
> To: 
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 3 - 7960s display "Phone
> Unprovisioned"
>
>
> I have lost a half a day beating myself up with this.
>
> I got my 2811 last night, so early this morning I started redoing the
> Vol 1 labs using my new 2811 instead of the 2621XM that I was using for
> BR2.
>
> Running 12.4(24)T1 IOS - Adv Enterprise and CME 7.1.0.1 full.  256 MB
> RAM and 256 MB Flash
>
> I have 4 phones connected locally - 3 x 7960s and 1 x 7961 as the lab
> specifies.  1 of the 7960s is SCCP as well as the 7961 is SCCP.  Both of
> them register fine.
>
> The other two 7960s are supposed to be SIP according to the lab.  Both
> show the same results as outlined below.
>
> When I tar'd in the 7.1 full, it did not appear to have any SIP phones
> loads.  So I tftp'd in the P0S3 files.  Contents of flash are:
>
>
>  147  -rw-4127  Sep 29 2009 19:29:18 +02:00  softkey1.xml
>  143  -rw-1369  Sep 29 2009 19:29:18 +02:00
> SIP001201E98F21.cnf
>  149  -rw-1368  Sep 29 2009 19:29:20 +02:00
> SIP00036BDD31E7.cnf
>  150  -rw-  15  Sep 29 2009 18:23:58 +02:00  OS79XX.TXT
>  151  -rw- 458  Sep 29 2009 18:24:20 +02:00  P0S3-8-12-00.loads
>  152  -rw-  756524  Sep 29 2009 18:28:32 +02:00  P0S3-8-12-00.sb2
>  153  -rw-  130552  Sep 29 2009 18:30:02 +02:00  P003-8-12-00.bin
>  154  -rw-  130956  Sep 29 2009 18:31:08 +02:00  P003-8-12-00.sbn
>
>
> I added the specific tftp-server commands as below:
>
> !
> tftp-server flash:SCCP41.8-4-2S.loads
> tftp-server flash:jar41sccp.8-4-1-23.sbn
> tftp-server flash:cnu41.8-4-1-23.sbn
> tftp-server flash:apps41.8-4-1-23.sbn
> tftp-server flash:dsp41.8-4-1-23.sbn
> tftp-server flash:cvm41sccp.8-4-1-23.sbn
> tftp-server flash:P0S3-8-12-00.loads alias P0S3-8-12-00.loads
> tftp-server flash:P0S3-8-12-00.sb2 alias P0S3-8-12-00.sb2
> tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.bin alias P003-8-12-00.bin
> tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.sbn alias P003-8-12-00.sbn
> tftp-server flash:OS79XX.TXT
> !
>
> The SIP specific portion of my configuration is below:
>
> voice service voip
>  allow-connections h323 to h323
>  allow-connections h323 to sip
>  allow-connections sip to h323
>  allow-connections sip to sip
>  fax protocol cisco
>  sip
>  bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.400
>  bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.400
>  registrar server expires max 600 min 60
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> voice register global
>  mode cme
>  max-dn 2
>  max-pool 2
>  load 7960-7940 P0S3-8-12-00
>  authenticate register
>  time-format 24
>  date-format D/M/Y
>  tftp-path flash:
>  create profile sync 0012952011811028
> !
> voice register dn  1
>  number 3005
>  name BR 2 Phone 2 - SIP - 3005
>  label BR 2 Phone 2 - SIP - 3005
> !
> voice register dn  2
>  number 3006
>  name BR 2 PHone 4 - SIP- 3006
>  label BR 2 Ph

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

[Mike Thompson]

So they're all registered.

 

Each of them is in their own MRG, etc.

 

Did you do a resync bandwidth after making any Location changes?

 

From: Aamir Panjwani [mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:13 PM
To: Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

show sccp output below

 

HQ

 

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE

Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000

TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1

Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0

Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A

Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization
Period: 30

RSVP : ENABLED

 

BR1

 

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE

Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000

TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1

Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0

Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A

Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization
Period: 30

RSVP : ENABLED

 

 

 

 

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 1:11 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

What's show sccp tell you at both routers?

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this time
not sure what's happening it just won't work. I get "not enough bandwidth"
on the phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn't pickup anything
obvious. 

 

1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on both
MGCP gateways

2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even if I
set the bandwidth to 400 it won't work

3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location configured and assigned to
respective device pools

4)  RSVP location set to "mandatory" between HQ and BR1. Video bandwidth
set to none.

5)  Have done no sccp/sccp, no mgcp/mgcp few times

6)  Have tried configuring ip rsvp bandwidth on physical and sub
interfaces

7)  Reset MRGL, phones etc

 

sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0.130

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface GigabitEthernet0/0.102

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register HQ-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

*

 

sccp local Vlan230

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface Vlan230

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register BR1-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vpim

[Brett Hillman]

I would not spend any time on this. The voice mail I saw was very basic. I 
would work hard on plus dialing and qos and srst. Would know mobility and snr 
basics.

- Original Message -
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 

To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
Sent: Tue Sep 29 22:14:25 2009
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 43, Issue 194

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo   license?
  (Nara Shikamaru)
   2. Re: vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work (Mike Thompson)
   3. Re: vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work (Aamir Panjwani)


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:05:01 -0700
From: Nara Shikamaru 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and
demolicense?
To: Michael Ciarfello , OSL Group

Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Frustrating.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Nara Shikamaru wrote:

> Frustrating.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Michael Ciarfello  > wrote:
>
>>  No, you have to buy it.  And I don't think it comes with the Cisco demo
>> licenses you can get from the web site.  Haven't tried to confirm.  The text
>> on the web page where it says to enter your MAC address doesn't indicate
>> VPIM is included.
>>
>> The good news it, VPIM for UC is MUCH cheaper than it was for Unity.  But
>> Unity demo came with VPIM, right?  OH well.
>>  --
>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
>> shikam...@kagadis.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:09 PM
>> *To:* OSL Group
>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo
>> license?
>>
>>  VPIM doesn't seem to be installable under the CUC demo license (I get an
>> error saying that the VPIM location can not be added because of a license
>> restriction.)  Is there a work around for home labbers?
>>
>> --
>> -Shikamaru
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
>



-- 
-Shikamaru
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/a367727e/attachment-0001.htm
 

--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:10:33 -0400
From: "Mike Thompson" 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work
To: "'Aamir Panjwani'" ,

Message-ID: <014701ca417b$93b58490$bb208d...@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

What's show sccp tell you at both routers?

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this time
not sure what's happening it just won't work. I get "not enough bandwidth"
on the phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn't pickup anything
obvious. 

 

1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on both
MGCP gateways

2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even if I
set the bandwidth to 400 it won't work

3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location configured and assigned to
respective device pools

4)  RSVP location set to "mandatory" between HQ and BR1. Video bandwidth
set to none.

5)  Have done no sccp/sccp, no mgcp/mgcp few times

6)  Have tried configuring ip rsvp bandwidth on physical and sub
interfaces

7)  Reset MRGL, phones etc

 

sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0.130

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface GigabitEthernet0/0.102

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register HQ-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

[Aamir Panjwani]

show sccp output below

 

HQ

 

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE

Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000

TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1

Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0

Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A

Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum
Packetization Period: 30

RSVP : ENABLED

 

BR1

 

MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE

Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000

TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1

Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0

Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A

Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum
Packetization Period: 30

RSVP : ENABLED

 

 

 

 

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 1:11 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

What's show sccp tell you at both routers?

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir
Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this
time not sure what's happening it just won't work. I get "not enough
bandwidth" on the phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn't
pickup anything obvious. 

 

1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on
both MGCP gateways

2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even
if I set the bandwidth to 400 it won't work

3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location configured and assigned to
respective device pools

4)  RSVP location set to "mandatory" between HQ and BR1. Video
bandwidth set to none.

5)  Have done no sccp/sccp, no mgcp/mgcp few times

6)  Have tried configuring ip rsvp bandwidth on physical and sub
interfaces

7)  Reset MRGL, phones etc

 

sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0.130

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface GigabitEthernet0/0.102

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register HQ-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

*

 

sccp local Vlan230

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface Vlan230

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register BR1-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
_
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

[Mike Thompson]

What's show sccp tell you at both routers?

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

 

I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this time
not sure what's happening it just won't work. I get "not enough bandwidth"
on the phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn't pickup anything
obvious. 

 

1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on both
MGCP gateways

2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even if I
set the bandwidth to 400 it won't work

3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location configured and assigned to
respective device pools

4)  RSVP location set to "mandatory" between HQ and BR1. Video bandwidth
set to none.

5)  Have done no sccp/sccp, no mgcp/mgcp few times

6)  Have tried configuring ip rsvp bandwidth on physical and sub
interfaces

7)  Reset MRGL, phones etc

 

sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0.130

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface GigabitEthernet0/0.102

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register HQ-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

*

 

sccp local Vlan230

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface Vlan230

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register BR1-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo license?

[Nara Shikamaru]

Frustrating.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Nara Shikamaru wrote:

> Frustrating.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Michael Ciarfello  > wrote:
>
>>  No, you have to buy it.  And I don't think it comes with the Cisco demo
>> licenses you can get from the web site.  Haven't tried to confirm.  The text
>> on the web page where it says to enter your MAC address doesn't indicate
>> VPIM is included.
>>
>> The good news it, VPIM for UC is MUCH cheaper than it was for Unity.  But
>> Unity demo came with VPIM, right?  OH well.
>>  --
>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
>> shikam...@kagadis.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:09 PM
>> *To:* OSL Group
>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo
>> license?
>>
>>  VPIM doesn't seem to be installable under the CUC demo license (I get an
>> error saying that the VPIM location can not be added because of a license
>> restriction.)  Is there a work around for home labbers?
>>
>> --
>> -Shikamaru
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
>



-- 
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work

[Aamir Panjwani]

I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this
time not sure what's happening it just won't work. I get "not enough
bandwidth" on the phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn't
pickup anything obvious. 

 

1)  HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and configured on
both MGCP gateways

2)  Ip rsvp bandwidth 112 command is configured on both ends. Even
if I set the bandwidth to 400 it won't work

3)  Appropriate MRG, MRGL and location configured and assigned to
respective device pools

4)  RSVP location set to "mandatory" between HQ and BR1. Video
bandwidth set to none.

5)  Have done no sccp/sccp, no mgcp/mgcp few times

6)  Have tried configuring ip rsvp bandwidth on physical and sub
interfaces

7)  Reset MRGL, phones etc

 

sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0.130

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface GigabitEthernet0/0.102

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register HQ-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

*

 

sccp local Vlan230

sccp ccm 10.210.210.11 identifier 1 version 7.0 

sccp ccm 10.210.210.12 identifier 2 version 7.0 

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

 bind interface Vlan230

 associate ccm 1 priority 1

 associate ccm 2 priority 2

 associate profile 1 register BR1-RSVP

!

dspfarm profile 1 mtp  

 codec pass-through

 codec g729r8

 rsvp

 maximum sessions software 4

 associate application SCCP

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
_
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 3 - 7960s display "PhoneUnprovisioned"

[Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA]

BK -
Thanks for the reply...

No joy

I had already tried what you had suggested - but I did it again
anyway.  Same result.

Phone shows "Phone Unprovisioned" and the debug tftp events
cycles between "Looking for SIPx.cnf", "Opened flash:/SIPxxx.cnf",
and Finished flash:/"SIPxxx.cnf"  then repeat the cycle.

Anyone else?

Jeff

---
Jeffrey T. Girard ("Jeff")
COL, 53
Future Forces Integration Directorate (FFID), Deputy - Networks
office:  (915)568-1240  DSN 978
Mobile:  (915)727-4222
reply to:  jeffrey.gir...@us.army.mil

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
bkvalent...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 5:58 PM
To: Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com;
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 3 - 7960s display
"PhoneUnprovisioned"

Er ah...

create profile (not create cnf-files)

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: bkvalent...@gmail.com

Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:47:09 
To: Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA;
;

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 3 - 7960s display "Phone
Unprovisioned"


At first glance, it seems okay to me.

Try shutting down the switchports connecting the phones.  Then go into
voice register global and do "no create profile".  The check flash to
make sure you don't have rogue SIP.cnf files.  If you find
any, delete them.  

Then go back to voice register global and do "create cnf files".  Then
do a no shut on the switchports connecting the phones.




Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: "Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA" 

Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:26:42 
To: 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 3 - 7960s display "Phone
Unprovisioned"


I have lost a half a day beating myself up with this.

I got my 2811 last night, so early this morning I started redoing the
Vol 1 labs using my new 2811 instead of the 2621XM that I was using for
BR2.

Running 12.4(24)T1 IOS - Adv Enterprise and CME 7.1.0.1 full.  256 MB
RAM and 256 MB Flash

I have 4 phones connected locally - 3 x 7960s and 1 x 7961 as the lab
specifies.  1 of the 7960s is SCCP as well as the 7961 is SCCP.  Both of
them register fine.

The other two 7960s are supposed to be SIP according to the lab.  Both
show the same results as outlined below.

When I tar'd in the 7.1 full, it did not appear to have any SIP phones
loads.  So I tftp'd in the P0S3 files.  Contents of flash are:


 147  -rw-4127  Sep 29 2009 19:29:18 +02:00  softkey1.xml
  143  -rw-1369  Sep 29 2009 19:29:18 +02:00
SIP001201E98F21.cnf
  149  -rw-1368  Sep 29 2009 19:29:20 +02:00
SIP00036BDD31E7.cnf
  150  -rw-  15  Sep 29 2009 18:23:58 +02:00  OS79XX.TXT
  151  -rw- 458  Sep 29 2009 18:24:20 +02:00  P0S3-8-12-00.loads
  152  -rw-  756524  Sep 29 2009 18:28:32 +02:00  P0S3-8-12-00.sb2
  153  -rw-  130552  Sep 29 2009 18:30:02 +02:00  P003-8-12-00.bin
  154  -rw-  130956  Sep 29 2009 18:31:08 +02:00  P003-8-12-00.sbn


I added the specific tftp-server commands as below:

!
tftp-server flash:SCCP41.8-4-2S.loads
tftp-server flash:jar41sccp.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:cnu41.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:apps41.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:dsp41.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:cvm41sccp.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:P0S3-8-12-00.loads alias P0S3-8-12-00.loads
tftp-server flash:P0S3-8-12-00.sb2 alias P0S3-8-12-00.sb2
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.bin alias P003-8-12-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.sbn alias P003-8-12-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:OS79XX.TXT
!

The SIP specific portion of my configuration is below:

voice service voip
 allow-connections h323 to h323
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 allow-connections sip to sip
 fax protocol cisco
 sip
  bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.400
  bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.400
  registrar server expires max 600 min 60
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
voice register global
 mode cme
 max-dn 2
 max-pool 2
 load 7960-7940 P0S3-8-12-00
 authenticate register
 time-format 24
 date-format D/M/Y
 tftp-path flash:
 create profile sync 0012952011811028
!
voice register dn  1
 number 3005
 name BR 2 Phone 2 - SIP - 3005
 label BR 2 Phone 2 - SIP - 3005
!
voice register dn  2
 number 3006
 name BR 2 PHone 4 - SIP- 3006
 label BR 2 Phone 4 - SIP - 3006
!
voice register template  1
 no conference enable
!
voice register dialplan  1
 type 7940-7960-others
!
voice register pool  1
 id mac 0012.01E9.8F21
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 1
 template 1
 dtmf-relay sip-notify
 username 3005 password cisco
 description 3214-3005
 codec g711ulaw
 no vad
!
voice register pool  2
 id mac 0003.6BDD.31E7
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 2
 template 1
 username 3006 password cisco
 description 3214-3006
 codec g711ulaw
 no 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo license?

[Michael Ciarfello]

No, you have to buy it.  And I don't think it comes with the Cisco demo 
licenses you can get from the web site.  Haven't tried to confirm.  The text on 
the web page where it says to enter your MAC address doesn't indicate VPIM is 
included.

The good news it, VPIM for UC is MUCH cheaper than it was for Unity.  But Unity 
demo came with VPIM, right?  OH well.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru 
[shikam...@kagadis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:09 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo license?

VPIM doesn't seem to be installable under the CUC demo license (I get an error 
saying that the VPIM location can not be added because of a license 
restriction.)  Is there a work around for home labbers?

--
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo license?

[Michael Ciarfello]

Right, but as that lab (kind of) pointed out, it's possible in one direction 
only.  I would still practice HQ to CCME then reconfigure and practice CCME to 
HQ without DNS.

That was an EXCELLENT question on the part of IPexpert.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mick Vaites 
[m...@pobox.net.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:56 PM
To: Nara Shikamaru; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo 
license?


If you checkout the blog notes that Mark Snow put together he advises that VPIM 
is not a tested item — at the moment.

Best regards

Mick

E: m...@pobox.net.uk
T: +44(0)1626 323592
M: +44(0)77255 18156
F: +44(0)1626 323591




From: Nara Shikamaru >
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:09:06 -0700
To: OSL Group >
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo license?

VPIM doesn't seem to be installable under the CUC demo license (I get an error 
saying that the VPIM location can not be added because of a license 
restriction.)  Is there a work around for home labbers?

--
-Shikamaru


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo license?

[Mick Vaites]

If you checkout the blog notes that Mark Snow put together he advises that
VPIM is not a tested item ‹ at the moment.

Best regards

Mick

E: m...@pobox.net.uk
T: +44(0)1626 323592
M: +44(0)77255 18156
F: +44(0)1626 323591




From: Nara Shikamaru 
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:09:06 -0700
To: OSL Group 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo
license?

VPIM doesn't seem to be installable under the CUC demo license (I get an
error saying that the VPIM location can not be added because of a license
restriction.)  Is there a work around for home labbers?

-- 
-Shikamaru


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 3 - 7960s display "Phone Unprovisioned"

[bkvalentine]

Er ah...

create profile (not create cnf-files)

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: bkvalent...@gmail.com

Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:47:09 
To: Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA; 
; 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 3 - 7960s display "Phone 
Unprovisioned"


At first glance, it seems okay to me.

Try shutting down the switchports connecting the phones.  Then go into voice 
register global and do "no create profile".  The check flash to make sure you 
don't have rogue SIP.cnf files.  If you find any, delete them.  

Then go back to voice register global and do "create cnf files".  Then do a no 
shut on the switchports connecting the phones.




Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: "Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA" 

Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:26:42 
To: 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 3 - 7960s display "Phone Unprovisioned"


I have lost a half a day beating myself up with this.

I got my 2811 last night, so early this morning I started redoing the
Vol 1 labs using my new 2811 instead of the 2621XM that I was using for
BR2.

Running 12.4(24)T1 IOS - Adv Enterprise and CME 7.1.0.1 full.  256 MB
RAM and 256 MB Flash

I have 4 phones connected locally - 3 x 7960s and 1 x 7961 as the lab
specifies.  1 of the 7960s is SCCP as well as the 7961 is SCCP.  Both of
them register fine.

The other two 7960s are supposed to be SIP according to the lab.  Both
show the same results as outlined below.

When I tar'd in the 7.1 full, it did not appear to have any SIP phones
loads.  So I tftp'd in the P0S3 files.  Contents of flash are:


 147  -rw-4127  Sep 29 2009 19:29:18 +02:00  softkey1.xml
  143  -rw-1369  Sep 29 2009 19:29:18 +02:00
SIP001201E98F21.cnf
  149  -rw-1368  Sep 29 2009 19:29:20 +02:00
SIP00036BDD31E7.cnf
  150  -rw-  15  Sep 29 2009 18:23:58 +02:00  OS79XX.TXT
  151  -rw- 458  Sep 29 2009 18:24:20 +02:00  P0S3-8-12-00.loads
  152  -rw-  756524  Sep 29 2009 18:28:32 +02:00  P0S3-8-12-00.sb2
  153  -rw-  130552  Sep 29 2009 18:30:02 +02:00  P003-8-12-00.bin
  154  -rw-  130956  Sep 29 2009 18:31:08 +02:00  P003-8-12-00.sbn


I added the specific tftp-server commands as below:

!
tftp-server flash:SCCP41.8-4-2S.loads
tftp-server flash:jar41sccp.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:cnu41.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:apps41.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:dsp41.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:cvm41sccp.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:P0S3-8-12-00.loads alias P0S3-8-12-00.loads
tftp-server flash:P0S3-8-12-00.sb2 alias P0S3-8-12-00.sb2
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.bin alias P003-8-12-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.sbn alias P003-8-12-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:OS79XX.TXT
!

The SIP specific portion of my configuration is below:

voice service voip
 allow-connections h323 to h323
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 allow-connections sip to sip
 fax protocol cisco
 sip
  bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.400
  bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.400
  registrar server expires max 600 min 60
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
voice register global
 mode cme
 max-dn 2
 max-pool 2
 load 7960-7940 P0S3-8-12-00
 authenticate register
 time-format 24
 date-format D/M/Y
 tftp-path flash:
 create profile sync 0012952011811028
!
voice register dn  1
 number 3005
 name BR 2 Phone 2 - SIP - 3005
 label BR 2 Phone 2 - SIP - 3005
!
voice register dn  2
 number 3006
 name BR 2 PHone 4 - SIP- 3006
 label BR 2 Phone 4 - SIP - 3006
!
voice register template  1
 no conference enable
!
voice register dialplan  1
 type 7940-7960-others
!
voice register pool  1
 id mac 0012.01E9.8F21
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 1
 template 1
 dtmf-relay sip-notify
 username 3005 password cisco
 description 3214-3005
 codec g711ulaw
 no vad
!
voice register pool  2
 id mac 0003.6BDD.31E7
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 2
 template 1
 username 3006 password cisco
 description 3214-3006
 codec g711ulaw
 no vad
!
!
!
!
And finally, the output of my debug tftp events command:

BR2Router#
Sep 29 18:37:53.383: TFTP: Looking for SIP001201E98F21.cnf
Sep 29 18:37:53.387: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, fd 7, size
1369 for process 268
Sep 29 18:37:53.399: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, time
00:00:00 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:22.434: TFTP: Looking for CTLSEP001201E98F21.tlv
Sep 29 18:38:22.454: TFTP: Looking for SEP001201E98F21.cnf.xml
Sep 29 18:38:22.478: TFTP: Looking for SIP001201E98F21.cnf
Sep 29 18:38:22.482: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, fd 7, size
1369 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:22.498: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, time
00:00:00 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:22.538: TFTP: Looking for P0S3-8-12-00.loads
Sep 29 18:38:22.542: TFTP: Opened flash:P0S3-8-12-00.loads, fd 7, size
458 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:22.546: TFTP: Finished flash:P0S3-8-12-00.loads, time
00:00:00 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:43.189: TFTP: Looking for SIPDefault.cnf
Sep 29 18:38:4

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 3 - 7960s display "Phone Unprovisioned"

[bkvalentine]

At first glance, it seems okay to me.

Try shutting down the switchports connecting the phones.  Then go into voice 
register global and do "no create profile".  The check flash to make sure you 
don't have rogue SIP.cnf files.  If you find any, delete them.  

Then go back to voice register global and do "create cnf files".  Then do a no 
shut on the switchports connecting the phones.




Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: "Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA" 

Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:26:42 
To: 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 3 - 7960s display "Phone Unprovisioned"


I have lost a half a day beating myself up with this.

I got my 2811 last night, so early this morning I started redoing the
Vol 1 labs using my new 2811 instead of the 2621XM that I was using for
BR2.

Running 12.4(24)T1 IOS - Adv Enterprise and CME 7.1.0.1 full.  256 MB
RAM and 256 MB Flash

I have 4 phones connected locally - 3 x 7960s and 1 x 7961 as the lab
specifies.  1 of the 7960s is SCCP as well as the 7961 is SCCP.  Both of
them register fine.

The other two 7960s are supposed to be SIP according to the lab.  Both
show the same results as outlined below.

When I tar'd in the 7.1 full, it did not appear to have any SIP phones
loads.  So I tftp'd in the P0S3 files.  Contents of flash are:


 147  -rw-4127  Sep 29 2009 19:29:18 +02:00  softkey1.xml
  143  -rw-1369  Sep 29 2009 19:29:18 +02:00
SIP001201E98F21.cnf
  149  -rw-1368  Sep 29 2009 19:29:20 +02:00
SIP00036BDD31E7.cnf
  150  -rw-  15  Sep 29 2009 18:23:58 +02:00  OS79XX.TXT
  151  -rw- 458  Sep 29 2009 18:24:20 +02:00  P0S3-8-12-00.loads
  152  -rw-  756524  Sep 29 2009 18:28:32 +02:00  P0S3-8-12-00.sb2
  153  -rw-  130552  Sep 29 2009 18:30:02 +02:00  P003-8-12-00.bin
  154  -rw-  130956  Sep 29 2009 18:31:08 +02:00  P003-8-12-00.sbn


I added the specific tftp-server commands as below:

!
tftp-server flash:SCCP41.8-4-2S.loads
tftp-server flash:jar41sccp.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:cnu41.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:apps41.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:dsp41.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:cvm41sccp.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:P0S3-8-12-00.loads alias P0S3-8-12-00.loads
tftp-server flash:P0S3-8-12-00.sb2 alias P0S3-8-12-00.sb2
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.bin alias P003-8-12-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.sbn alias P003-8-12-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:OS79XX.TXT
!

The SIP specific portion of my configuration is below:

voice service voip
 allow-connections h323 to h323
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 allow-connections sip to sip
 fax protocol cisco
 sip
  bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.400
  bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.400
  registrar server expires max 600 min 60
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
voice register global
 mode cme
 max-dn 2
 max-pool 2
 load 7960-7940 P0S3-8-12-00
 authenticate register
 time-format 24
 date-format D/M/Y
 tftp-path flash:
 create profile sync 0012952011811028
!
voice register dn  1
 number 3005
 name BR 2 Phone 2 - SIP - 3005
 label BR 2 Phone 2 - SIP - 3005
!
voice register dn  2
 number 3006
 name BR 2 PHone 4 - SIP- 3006
 label BR 2 Phone 4 - SIP - 3006
!
voice register template  1
 no conference enable
!
voice register dialplan  1
 type 7940-7960-others
!
voice register pool  1
 id mac 0012.01E9.8F21
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 1
 template 1
 dtmf-relay sip-notify
 username 3005 password cisco
 description 3214-3005
 codec g711ulaw
 no vad
!
voice register pool  2
 id mac 0003.6BDD.31E7
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 2
 template 1
 username 3006 password cisco
 description 3214-3006
 codec g711ulaw
 no vad
!
!
!
!
And finally, the output of my debug tftp events command:

BR2Router#
Sep 29 18:37:53.383: TFTP: Looking for SIP001201E98F21.cnf
Sep 29 18:37:53.387: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, fd 7, size
1369 for process 268
Sep 29 18:37:53.399: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, time
00:00:00 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:22.434: TFTP: Looking for CTLSEP001201E98F21.tlv
Sep 29 18:38:22.454: TFTP: Looking for SEP001201E98F21.cnf.xml
Sep 29 18:38:22.478: TFTP: Looking for SIP001201E98F21.cnf
Sep 29 18:38:22.482: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, fd 7, size
1369 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:22.498: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, time
00:00:00 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:22.538: TFTP: Looking for P0S3-8-12-00.loads
Sep 29 18:38:22.542: TFTP: Opened flash:P0S3-8-12-00.loads, fd 7, size
458 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:22.546: TFTP: Finished flash:P0S3-8-12-00.loads, time
00:00:00 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:43.189: TFTP: Looking for SIPDefault.cnf
Sep 29 18:38:43.193: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIPDefault.cnf, fd 7, size 1717
for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:43.213: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIPDefault.cnf, time 00:00:00
for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:43.389: TFTP: Looking for SIP001201E98F21.cnf
Sep 29 18:38:43.393: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, fd 7, size

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 3 - 7960s display "Phone Unprovisioned"

[Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA]

I have lost a half a day beating myself up with this.

I got my 2811 last night, so early this morning I started redoing the
Vol 1 labs using my new 2811 instead of the 2621XM that I was using for
BR2.

Running 12.4(24)T1 IOS - Adv Enterprise and CME 7.1.0.1 full.  256 MB
RAM and 256 MB Flash

I have 4 phones connected locally - 3 x 7960s and 1 x 7961 as the lab
specifies.  1 of the 7960s is SCCP as well as the 7961 is SCCP.  Both of
them register fine.

The other two 7960s are supposed to be SIP according to the lab.  Both
show the same results as outlined below.

When I tar'd in the 7.1 full, it did not appear to have any SIP phones
loads.  So I tftp'd in the P0S3 files.  Contents of flash are:


 147  -rw-4127  Sep 29 2009 19:29:18 +02:00  softkey1.xml
  143  -rw-1369  Sep 29 2009 19:29:18 +02:00
SIP001201E98F21.cnf
  149  -rw-1368  Sep 29 2009 19:29:20 +02:00
SIP00036BDD31E7.cnf
  150  -rw-  15  Sep 29 2009 18:23:58 +02:00  OS79XX.TXT
  151  -rw- 458  Sep 29 2009 18:24:20 +02:00  P0S3-8-12-00.loads
  152  -rw-  756524  Sep 29 2009 18:28:32 +02:00  P0S3-8-12-00.sb2
  153  -rw-  130552  Sep 29 2009 18:30:02 +02:00  P003-8-12-00.bin
  154  -rw-  130956  Sep 29 2009 18:31:08 +02:00  P003-8-12-00.sbn


I added the specific tftp-server commands as below:

!
tftp-server flash:SCCP41.8-4-2S.loads
tftp-server flash:jar41sccp.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:cnu41.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:apps41.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:dsp41.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:cvm41sccp.8-4-1-23.sbn
tftp-server flash:P0S3-8-12-00.loads alias P0S3-8-12-00.loads
tftp-server flash:P0S3-8-12-00.sb2 alias P0S3-8-12-00.sb2
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.bin alias P003-8-12-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.sbn alias P003-8-12-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:OS79XX.TXT
!

The SIP specific portion of my configuration is below:

voice service voip
 allow-connections h323 to h323
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 allow-connections sip to sip
 fax protocol cisco
 sip
  bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.400
  bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.400
  registrar server expires max 600 min 60
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
voice register global
 mode cme
 max-dn 2
 max-pool 2
 load 7960-7940 P0S3-8-12-00
 authenticate register
 time-format 24
 date-format D/M/Y
 tftp-path flash:
 create profile sync 0012952011811028
!
voice register dn  1
 number 3005
 name BR 2 Phone 2 - SIP - 3005
 label BR 2 Phone 2 - SIP - 3005
!
voice register dn  2
 number 3006
 name BR 2 PHone 4 - SIP- 3006
 label BR 2 Phone 4 - SIP - 3006
!
voice register template  1
 no conference enable
!
voice register dialplan  1
 type 7940-7960-others
!
voice register pool  1
 id mac 0012.01E9.8F21
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 1
 template 1
 dtmf-relay sip-notify
 username 3005 password cisco
 description 3214-3005
 codec g711ulaw
 no vad
!
voice register pool  2
 id mac 0003.6BDD.31E7
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 2
 template 1
 username 3006 password cisco
 description 3214-3006
 codec g711ulaw
 no vad
!
!
!
!
And finally, the output of my debug tftp events command:

BR2Router#
Sep 29 18:37:53.383: TFTP: Looking for SIP001201E98F21.cnf
Sep 29 18:37:53.387: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, fd 7, size
1369 for process 268
Sep 29 18:37:53.399: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, time
00:00:00 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:22.434: TFTP: Looking for CTLSEP001201E98F21.tlv
Sep 29 18:38:22.454: TFTP: Looking for SEP001201E98F21.cnf.xml
Sep 29 18:38:22.478: TFTP: Looking for SIP001201E98F21.cnf
Sep 29 18:38:22.482: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, fd 7, size
1369 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:22.498: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, time
00:00:00 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:22.538: TFTP: Looking for P0S3-8-12-00.loads
Sep 29 18:38:22.542: TFTP: Opened flash:P0S3-8-12-00.loads, fd 7, size
458 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:22.546: TFTP: Finished flash:P0S3-8-12-00.loads, time
00:00:00 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:43.189: TFTP: Looking for SIPDefault.cnf
Sep 29 18:38:43.193: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIPDefault.cnf, fd 7, size 1717
for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:43.213: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIPDefault.cnf, time 00:00:00
for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:43.389: TFTP: Looking for SIP001201E98F21.cnf
Sep 29 18:38:43.393: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, fd 7, size
1369 for process 268
Sep 29 18:38:43.405: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, time
00:00:00 for process 268
Sep 29 18:39:15.008: TFTP: Looking for SIP001201E98F21.cnf
Sep 29 18:39:15.012: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, fd 7, size
1369 for process 268
Sep 29 18:39:15.024: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, time
00:00:00 for process 268

These are the same phones that were registered as SIP loads to my 2621XM
last night.  

Hopefully someone can see my mistake...I cant

Jeff

---
Jeffrey T. Girard ("Jeff")
COL, 53
Future Forces Integrati

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.3 - VPIM and demo license?

[Nara Shikamaru]

VPIM doesn't seem to be installable under the CUC demo license (I get an
error saying that the VPIM location can not be added because of a license
restriction.)  Is there a work around for home labbers?

-- 
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] T1 CAS

[J Hogan]

this is not a PRI circuit. it is a voice T1

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Pulos, Greg  wrote:

> A specific isdn switch type depends on your telco. You must verify with
> them what type of switch is terminating the PRI.
>
> If this is the IP Expert labs, then the switch type should be identified in
> your Lab Info sheets which show IP addresses, circuit info, etc.
>
> You'll also need to setup the Serial port created by the PRI Group. Your
> serial interface will be S0/3/0:23. Don't forget binding the ISDN L3 to ccm
> on that interface. (this is how the gateway backhauls the PRI signaling to
> the ccm)
>
> Greg.
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: J Hogan [mailto:j.jho...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 12:05 PM
> To: Pulos, Greg
> Cc: James Key; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] T1 CAS
>
> I did not know that it needs to be pri- group. Also is there a
> specific isdn switch type?
>
> Thanks
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 28, 2009, at 6:24 AM, "Pulos, Greg"  wrote:
>
> > How is it you're attempting to configure CAS channels to talk using
> > CCS signaling? (aka ISDN)
> >
> > Change your DS0 group command to PRI group.
> >
> > greg
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-
> > boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of J Hogan
> > Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 5:42 PM
> > To: James Key
> > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] T1 CAS
> >
> > I am using the ccm-manager bind command and the interface is up/up
> > as this is also the interface I telnet into.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 8:56 AM, James Key  wrote:
> >
> >
> >Remove both MGCP bind commands, see if it comes up, then add back
> > in.
> > 
> >
> >From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-
> > boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of J Hogan [j.jho...@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 8:41 AM
> >To: Nara Shikamaru
> >Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] T1 CAS
> >
> >
> >the domanin name i removed. and yes the router host name matches
> > too?
> >
> >
> >On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Nara Shikamaru <
> shikam...@kagadis.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
> >Verify that the gateway's hostname.domain-name matches the
> > Domain Name field on the router.
> >
> >
> >On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 1:11 PM, J Hogan 
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >Hello All
> >
> >   I have a T1 configured and I keep getting registration
> > rejected. I beleive I am doing everything right
> >1.) I restarted MGCPno mgcp, mgcp
> >2.) I only have 16 DSPs
> >2.) here is what i did   thughts
> >
> >voice class codec 1
> > codec preference 1 g729r8
> > codec preference 2 g711ulaw
> >
> >card type t1 0 3
> >
> >controller T1 0/3/0
> >
> >controller T1 0/3/0
> > framing esf
> > linecode b8zs
> > cablelength short 110ft
> > ds0-group 1 timeslots 1-10 type e&m-wink-start
> >
> >ccm-manager mgcp
> >no ccm-manager fax protocol cisco
> >ccm-manager music-on-hold
> >ccm-manager config server 192.168.60.6
> >ccm-manager config
> >!
> >mgcp
> >mgcp call-agent 192.168.60.6 service-type mgcp version 0.1
> >mgcp rtp unreachable timeout 1000 action notify
> >mgcp modem passthrough voip mode nse
> >mgcp package-capability rtp-package
> >mgcp package-capability sst-package
> >mgcp package-capability pre-package
> >no mgcp package-capability res-package
> >no mgcp timer receive-rtcp
> >mgcp sdp simple
> >mgcp fax t38 inhibit
> >mgcp rtp payload-type g726r16 static
> >mgcp bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0
> >mgcp bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >J. Hogan MCP,CCDA,CCDP, CCNA, CCNP, CCSP, CCAI
> >Yahoo ID: jhogan552000
> >AIM ID: jhogan55
> >MSN ID: jhogan55
> >ICQ ID: 257599283
> >
> >Live Life And Do Not Kill Time.
> >
> >
> >___
> >For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
> > training, please visit www.ipexpert.com 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >-Shikamaru
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >J. Hogan MCP,CCDA,CCDP, CCNA, CCNP, CCSP, CCAI
> >Yahoo ID: jhogan552000
> >AIM ID: jhogan55
> >MSN ID: jhogan55
> >ICQ ID: 257599283
> >
> >Live Life And Do Not Kill Time.
> >
> >NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any f

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.2 - Question about the Proctor Guide solution confusion

[Nara Shikamaru]

Thanks for the confirmation, Vik.  Lng three-day weekend studying, I
thought I was begining to unlearn this stuff :(

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Vik Malhi  wrote:

> I’ve just checked and the first comment does reference a BACD- this first
> comment is clearly out of context and does not belong to the solution for
> this question.
> --
> Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: *vma...@ipexpert.com
>
> *
> Join our free online support and peer group communities:
> *http://www.IPexpert.com/communities 
> *IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
> Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE
> R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
> CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *Nara Shikamaru 
> *Date: *Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:45:40 -0700
> *To: *OSL Group 
> *Subject: *[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.2 - Question about
> the Proctor Guide solution confusion
>
> Has anyone reviewed the PG solution for this question?  The PG references a
> BACD (presumably CME).  I can't find any reference in the question itself
> regard CME or in any of the ensuing sections (in fact, am I wrong, there's
> not much CME configuration in this mock lab besides the basics.)  Confusing.
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
>
> --
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>



-- 
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.2 - Question about the Proctor Guide solution confusion

[Vik Malhi]

I¹ve just checked and the first comment does reference a BACD- this first
comment is clearly out of context and does not belong to the solution for
this question.
-- 
Vik Malhi ­ CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com


Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand
and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage
Lab Certifications.








From: Nara Shikamaru 
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:45:40 -0700
To: OSL Group 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.2 - Question about the
Proctor Guide solution confusion

Has anyone reviewed the PG solution for this question?  The PG references a
BACD (presumably CME).  I can't find any reference in the question itself
regard CME or in any of the ensuing sections (in fact, am I wrong, there's
not much CME configuration in this mock lab besides the basics.)  Confusing.

-- 
-Shikamaru


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice discounted vouchers & bootcamp

[Russ Meuchel]

Fellow CCIE Voice studiers:
  Please note that I asked Mike Down at IP Expert if it was OK before
sending out this e-mail:

I'm not going to be able to use everything that I purchased from IP Expert.
It's definitely the best material out there, but I'm working way too much
overtime for the forseeable future to be able to study / attend the classes
that I already purchased.

I have 39 CCIE Voice Proctor Lab vouchers, the CCIE Voice Bootcamp class and
CCIE Voice end to end mock lab class for sale.

Proctor Lab Vouchers - $30 each
1 week CCIE Voice classes - $2500 each

I also have two 2811 lab routers ready for voice / CME with DSPs.  Please
contact me if interested.

Thanks.
Russ Meuchel
586-530-4752 / rmeuc...@gmail.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 2 Question 8.2 - Question about the Proctor Guide solution confusion

[Nara Shikamaru]

Has anyone reviewed the PG solution for this question?  The PG references a
BACD (presumably CME).  I can't find any reference in the question itself
regard CME or in any of the ensuing sections (in fact, am I wrong, there's
not much CME configuration in this mock lab besides the basics.)  Confusing.

-- 
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interview Preparation

[Thomas Koch]

Matthew, 

Is this a technical interview? 

Just focus on your experiences and what you have accomplished in your
career. As far as Cisco voice, you want to go over the solutions that you've
designed and implemented and if you've had to support them as well.and how
they have benefited you end users/customers.  

Best of luck man. 

 

Thomas J Koch
Owner/Consultant 

CCNA, CCVP
Digitones, LLC
Cell: 630-808-4910
E-mail: digito...@comcast.net

  _  

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Berry
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:10 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interview Preparation

 

All -

This is a bit off-topic, but I'm going in for an interview tomorrow.  Does
anyone have any suggestions specifically related to our Cisco voice
experience?  

Any suggestions on technical information to review, things to highlight,
etc.?

Thanks!

Matthew Berry
Minneapolis, MN 55438
Mobile: 612-424-5044
  www.rawreligion.com
Skype: ciscovoiceguru


"Knowledge speaks, but wisdom listens."

Contact Me   Linkedin
 Facebook
 Twitter

 

<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

[Mike Thompson]

Guys, don't forget that in the 'my configs' section on the IPExpert page,
there is a working config for each lab.  Within those configs are the
configs to emulate the PSTN router that includes the PSTN and WAN Frame
Relay configuration.

 

Anyone taking this exam should be able to modify that configuration to suit
their needs (maybe not build it from scratch in a short afternoon, but at
least modify it).

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:12 AM
To: anupam TYAGI
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

 

I'm using a 2821 (borrowed from work).  Two ports need to terminate T1 PRIs
from HQ and BR1, the other port needs to terminate an E1 from BR2.  After
you put it together, you'll be spending time configuring dial peers that
work with the IPexpert labs but it works like a dream after everything's
done.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:54 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:

Hi , 

 

I am on the process of building home ccie voice lab . Can somebody suggest
how to go forward in building the pstn simulator ,,,

 

Thanks 

Anu


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com  






-- 
-Shikamaru

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interview Preparation

[Nara Shikamaru]

Mention your constant training, people like to hear that their engineer's
are always trying to learn new things that will benefit their organizations.

Talk about your background and track record and discuss some of the hardest
projects you've been part of and how you managed them.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Matthew Berry wrote:

> All -
>
> This is a bit off-topic, but I'm going in for an interview tomorrow.  Does
> anyone have any suggestions specifically related to our Cisco voice
> experience?
>
> Any suggestions on technical information to review, things to highlight,
> etc.?
>
>  Thanks!
>
> Matthew Berry
> Minneapolis, MN 55438
> Mobile: 612-424-5044
> www.rawreligion.com
> Skype: ciscovoiceguru
>
>
> "Knowledge speaks, but wisdom listens."
> Contact Me [image: Linkedin] [image:
> Facebook] [image: 
> Twitter]
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>


-- 
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interview Preparation

[anil batra]

Hello Mathew,
 
Know about that company what do they do ( the best options is if you know 
someone over there or visit their website)  and see what all you know out of 
what all they do. And, of course, refresh your memory with all voice technical 
stuff and the voice projects you have done.
 
Wish you Best of Luck !!!
-Anil

--- On Tue, 9/29/09, Matthew Berry  wrote:


From: Matthew Berry 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interview Preparation
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 8:40 PM


All -

This is a bit off-topic, but I'm going in for an interview tomorrow.  Does 
anyone have any suggestions specifically related to our Cisco voice 
experience?  

Any suggestions on technical information to review, things to highlight, etc.?



Thanks!

Matthew Berry
Minneapolis, MN 55438
Mobile: 612-424-5044
www.rawreligion.com
Skype: ciscovoiceguru


"Knowledge speaks, but wisdom listens."

Contact Me 

-Inline Attachment Follows-


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home LAB PSTN

[Brett Hillman]

 slow.  The
integration
> itself seems to timeout.  It takes me several attempts and it is very
> slooow, pings timeout or are 2 to 3 seconds.
>
> Anyone having the same issue or any thought on getting around this?
Since
> there is nothing else on the network I really did not expect this type
of
> behavior.
>
> Thanks,
> cd
>
> 
>
> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail?. See how.
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
> 
>
> Hotmail? has ever-growing storage! Don't worry about storage limits.
Check
> it out.
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
> 

> Microsoft brings you a new way to search the web. Try Bing(tm) now

> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/43d
97349/attachment-0001.htm 

--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:56:02 -0400
From: "Mike Thompson" 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor
To: "'Jeff Garvas'" , "'anupam TYAGI'"

Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Message-ID: <004101ca4114$f7a49430$e6edbc...@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Pretty much the exact thing I did.  Since I had a glut of VWIC-2MFT and
no
VWIC2-2MFT floating around the lab, I just went the route of assuming a
Euro
PRI would be T-1 format.  As long as in your mind you keep track of the
difference in the lab (D channel being on 16 vs 23, linecoding / framing
differences), there really isn't any difference.  This is of course
until
they get E1-R2 back into the mix, but Ben has pretty much stated (based
off
Networkers and different VoD products) that E1 CAS won't be in the lab
in
the near future.

 

Just my two pennies.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Garvas
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:35 AM
To: anupam TYAGI
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

 

I used a 2811 just because they were available here at work.

I have a combination of VWIC2-xMFT-T1/E1 cards populated in it aligned
with
the ipexpert configuration for the PSTN router so I can paste their PSTN
configuration into my PSTN router without having to make too many
modifications.

It may not be the most cost effective solution for a home lab.

-jeff

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:54 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:

Hi , 

 

I am on the process of building home ccie voice lab . Can somebody
suggest
how to go forward in building the pstn simulator ,,,

 

Thanks 

Anu


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/225
f42ab/attachment-0001.htm 

--

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:10:29 -0500
From: Matthew Berry 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interview Preparation
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Message-ID:
<6459095c0909290810m640df027ub31d072dfdac8...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

All -

This is a bit off-topic, but I'm going in for an interview tomorrow.
Does
anyone have any suggestions specifically related to our Cisco voice
experience?

Any suggestions on technical information to review, things to highlight,
etc.?

Thanks!

Matthew Berry
Minneapolis, MN 55438
Mobile: 612-424-5044
www.rawreligion.com
Skype: ciscovoiceguru


"Knowledge speaks, but wis

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE bandwidth hog

[Brett Hillman]

g it with CallManager my remote site
> bandwidth is choked.  Dial tone on my phones if very slow.  The
integration
> itself seems to timeout.  It takes me several attempts and it is very
> slooow, pings timeout or are 2 to 3 seconds.
>
> Anyone having the same issue or any thought on getting around this?
Since
> there is nothing else on the network I really did not expect this type
of
> behavior.
>
> Thanks,
> cd
>
> 
>
> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail?. See how.
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
> 
>
> Hotmail? has ever-growing storage! Don't worry about storage limits.
Check
> it out.
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
> 

> Microsoft brings you a new way to search the web. Try Bing(tm) now

> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/43d
97349/attachment-0001.htm 

--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:56:02 -0400
From: "Mike Thompson" 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor
To: "'Jeff Garvas'" , "'anupam TYAGI'"

Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Message-ID: <004101ca4114$f7a49430$e6edbc...@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Pretty much the exact thing I did.  Since I had a glut of VWIC-2MFT and
no
VWIC2-2MFT floating around the lab, I just went the route of assuming a
Euro
PRI would be T-1 format.  As long as in your mind you keep track of the
difference in the lab (D channel being on 16 vs 23, linecoding / framing
differences), there really isn't any difference.  This is of course
until
they get E1-R2 back into the mix, but Ben has pretty much stated (based
off
Networkers and different VoD products) that E1 CAS won't be in the lab
in
the near future.

 

Just my two pennies.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Garvas
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:35 AM
To: anupam TYAGI
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

 

I used a 2811 just because they were available here at work.

I have a combination of VWIC2-xMFT-T1/E1 cards populated in it aligned
with
the ipexpert configuration for the PSTN router so I can paste their PSTN
configuration into my PSTN router without having to make too many
modifications.

It may not be the most cost effective solution for a home lab.

-jeff

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:54 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:

Hi , 

 

I am on the process of building home ccie voice lab . Can somebody
suggest
how to go forward in building the pstn simulator ,,,

 

Thanks 

Anu


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/225
f42ab/attachment-0001.htm 

--

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:10:29 -0500
From: Matthew Berry 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interview Preparation
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Message-ID:
<6459095c0909290810m640df027ub31d072dfdac8...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

All -

This is a bit off-topic, but I'm going in for an interview tomorrow.
Does
anyone have any suggestions specifically related to our Cisco voice
experience?

Any suggestions on technical information to revie

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question regarding MVA

[Darren Manners]

At present Im testing Mobile Voice Access. I have a mgcp PSTN gateway so
I've added another router to allow for h323 hairpin. The H323 router
also is a gateway to a much larger gatekeeper setup. The setup on the
router is as follows:

 

I have a route pattern "140" that points to the h323 gateway. 

 

application

 service cmm http://:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml
 

 

dial-peer voice 5311 voip

 service cmm

 session target ipv4:

 incoming called-number 140

 codec g711ulaw

!

dial-peer voice 5312 voip

 preference 2

 service cmm

 session target ipv4: :

 incoming called-number 140

 codec g711ulaw

!

dial-peer voice 3511 voip

 preference 1

 destination-pattern 1140

 voice-class h323 1

 session target ipv4: :

 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric

 codec g711ulaw

 no vad

!

dial-peer voice 3512 voip

 preference 2

 destination-pattern 1140

 voice-class h323 1

 session target ipv4: :

 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric

 codec g711ulaw

 no vad

 

All this seems to work fine. However, calls from the gatekeeper (still
waiting for PRI install for mgcp testing) the ANI shows 10 digit numbers
(great) but needs to be prefixed with a 9 now to allow users to redial
and allow redial without editing from presence. 

 

I've looked at the gateway "incoming call party settings". I can add the
9 prefix there and the history shows up fin (ie 10 digits plus the
9)...however this now breaks the MVA.When I remove the 9
prefix...mva starts working again. Since im working on the new features
in 7.0 for the exam I thought this may be a good question that will
build on my knowledge

 

Any ideas before I start...Im probably thinking along the lines of
device pool css transformations?

 

Darren 

 

 

Information Security Officer
Mountain Empire Community College 
CCIE (SEC) # 18929, CISSP (#85782), CCSP, GIAC GCIA (#0849) GCIH (#1348)
GCWN (#0467) CCVP, MCSE, ASE HP, CCA

 

Tel: 276 523 2400 ext 226 


Email: dmann...@me.vccs.edu mailto:dmann...@me.vccs.edu>  
www.mecc.edu http://www.mecc.edu/>  

 


29/9/2009
Darren Manners
dmann...@me.vccs.edu
http://www.mecc.edu

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information or otherwise be protected by law. Any access, use, 
disclosure or distribution of this email message by anyone other than the 
intended recipient(s) is unauthorized and prohibited. If you are not an 
intended recipient (or an agent acting on an intended recipients behalf), 
please contact the sender by reply e-mail and immediately destroy all copies of 
the original message.  Virus scanning is recommended on all email attachments. 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

[Nara Shikamaru]

I'm using a 2821 (borrowed from work).  Two ports need to terminate T1 PRIs
from HQ and BR1, the other port needs to terminate an E1 from BR2.  After
you put it together, you'll be spending time configuring dial peers that
work with the IPexpert labs but it works like a dream after everything's
done.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:54 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:

> Hi ,
>
> I am on the process of building home ccie voice lab . Can somebody suggest
> how to go forward in building the pstn simulator ,,,
>
> Thanks
> Anu
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>


-- 
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interview Preparation

[Matthew Berry]

All -

This is a bit off-topic, but I'm going in for an interview tomorrow.  Does
anyone have any suggestions specifically related to our Cisco voice
experience?

Any suggestions on technical information to review, things to highlight,
etc.?

Thanks!

Matthew Berry
Minneapolis, MN 55438
Mobile: 612-424-5044
www.rawreligion.com
Skype: ciscovoiceguru


"Knowledge speaks, but wisdom listens."
Contact Me [image: Linkedin] [image:
Facebook] [image:
Twitter]
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

[Mike Thompson]

Pretty much the exact thing I did.  Since I had a glut of VWIC-2MFT and no
VWIC2-2MFT floating around the lab, I just went the route of assuming a Euro
PRI would be T-1 format.  As long as in your mind you keep track of the
difference in the lab (D channel being on 16 vs 23, linecoding / framing
differences), there really isn't any difference.  This is of course until
they get E1-R2 back into the mix, but Ben has pretty much stated (based off
Networkers and different VoD products) that E1 CAS won't be in the lab in
the near future.

 

Just my two pennies.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Garvas
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:35 AM
To: anupam TYAGI
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

 

I used a 2811 just because they were available here at work.

I have a combination of VWIC2-xMFT-T1/E1 cards populated in it aligned with
the ipexpert configuration for the PSTN router so I can paste their PSTN
configuration into my PSTN router without having to make too many
modifications.

It may not be the most cost effective solution for a home lab.

-jeff

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:54 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:

Hi , 

 

I am on the process of building home ccie voice lab . Can somebody suggest
how to go forward in building the pstn simulator ,,,

 

Thanks 

Anu


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?

[Mike Thompson]

No, that’s the key thing.  But the problem is that CIR defaults to ½ of the
port speed (1/2 of 56k), so you’re pulling a lot of traffic across a 28k
link.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Garvas
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:17 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?

 

Aamir,

I haven't bought the second volume yet and you have me scratching my head.
Is it something other / more significant than FRTS defaulting to 56k?  

-Jeff



On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Aamir Panjwani
 wrote:

Please refer to ipexpert vol 2 lab 3 question 5.3 for answer to this
particular problem.

That explains why CUE goes crazy when QOS is only configured on one PVC...





-Original Message-
From: ccieid1ot [mailto:ccieid...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 28 September 2009 11:40 PM
To: Cisco Dave
Cc: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?

Make sure it's on both sides if you enable it.  You will need it for
QOS anyways.

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Cisco Dave  wrote:
> Yes, it was a misplaced command as seen here below. Removing that one
> command resolved my issue.
>
> interface Serial0/1/0:0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> no fair-queue
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay lmi-type ansi
>
> -Dave
>
> 
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:44:43 +1000
> From: aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au
> To: ciscod...@live.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> Dave,
>
>
>
> Are  you saying that you had to remove  "frame-relay traffic shaping"
> command from the physical interface?
>
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> From: Cisco Dave [mailto:ciscod...@live.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 26 September 2009 8:07 AM
> To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
>
>
>
> I put a base config on both routers and ended up with the same situation.
> After a closer look I noticed a shaping command on the HQ router.  All is
> working great after removing that statement.
>
> Thanks for pointing me in the right direction,
> cd
>
>
> 
>
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:17:13 +1000
> From: aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au
> To: ciscod...@live.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> It seems to happen when you have QOS setup on one of the PVC's.  remove
all
> the QOS config and try again
>
>
>
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cisco Dave
> Sent: Thursday, 24 September 2009 6:13 PM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
>
>
>
> When setting up CUE and integrating it with CallManager my remote site
> bandwidth is choked.  Dial tone on my phones if very slow.  The
integration
> itself seems to timeout.  It takes me several attempts and it is very
> slooow, pings timeout or are 2 to 3 seconds.
>
> Anyone having the same issue or any thought on getting around this?  Since
> there is nothing else on the network I really did not expect this type of
> behavior.
>
> Thanks,
> cd
>
> 
>
> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. See how.
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
> 
>
> Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don't worry about storage limits. Check
> it out.
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
> 

> Microsoft brings you a new way to search the web. Try Bing(tm) now

> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE-CM integration issue

[vineet sanghi]

CUE is giving following error while integrating with CM. CTI ports and route 
poinst are not registered in CMM.

"The Cisco Unity Express CTI ports do not register with the Cisco CallManager, 
and the "JTAPI login failed. Error while determining CCM version -1" error 
message appears".

Following link is about same error but for ver 4.X. 
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-3211

I have stopped CSA on CM and restrarted CM & CUE couple of times.

Has anybody faced this issue or have a solution to this.

Vineet


  
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

[Jeff Garvas]

I used a 2811 just because they were available here at work.

I have a combination of VWIC2-xMFT-T1/E1 cards populated in it aligned with
the ipexpert configuration for the PSTN router so I can paste their PSTN
configuration into my PSTN router without having to make too many
modifications.

It may not be the most cost effective solution for a home lab.

-jeff

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:54 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:

> Hi ,
>
> I am on the process of building home ccie voice lab . Can somebody suggest
> how to go forward in building the pstn simulator ,,,
>
> Thanks
> Anu
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?

[Jeff Garvas]

Aamir,

I haven't bought the second volume yet and you have me scratching my head.
Is it something other / more significant than FRTS defaulting to 56k?

-Jeff


On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Aamir Panjwani <
aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au> wrote:

> Please refer to ipexpert vol 2 lab 3 question 5.3 for answer to this
> particular problem.
>
> That explains why CUE goes crazy when QOS is only configured on one PVC...
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccieid1ot [mailto:ccieid...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, 28 September 2009 11:40 PM
> To: Cisco Dave
> Cc: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
>
> Make sure it's on both sides if you enable it.  You will need it for
> QOS anyways.
>
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Cisco Dave  wrote:
> > Yes, it was a misplaced command as seen here below. Removing that one
> > command resolved my issue.
> >
> > interface Serial0/1/0:0
> > no ip address
> > encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> > no fair-queue
> > frame-relay traffic-shaping
> > frame-relay lmi-type ansi
> >
> > -Dave
> >
> > 
> > Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
> > Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:44:43 +1000
> > From: aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au
> > To: ciscod...@live.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >
> > Dave,
> >
> >
> >
> > Are  you saying that you had to remove  "frame-relay traffic shaping"
> > command from the physical interface?
> >
> >
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Cisco Dave [mailto:ciscod...@live.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, 26 September 2009 8:07 AM
> > To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> > Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
> >
> >
> >
> > I put a base config on both routers and ended up with the same situation.
> > After a closer look I noticed a shaping command on the HQ router.  All is
> > working great after removing that statement.
> >
> > Thanks for pointing me in the right direction,
> > cd
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> > Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
> > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:17:13 +1000
> > From: aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au
> > To: ciscod...@live.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >
> > It seems to happen when you have QOS setup on one of the PVC's.  remove
> all
> > the QOS config and try again
> >
> >
> >
> > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> > [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cisco Dave
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 September 2009 6:13 PM
> > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
> >
> >
> >
> > When setting up CUE and integrating it with CallManager my remote site
> > bandwidth is choked.  Dial tone on my phones if very slow.  The
> integration
> > itself seems to timeout.  It takes me several attempts and it is very
> > slooow, pings timeout or are 2 to 3 seconds.
> >
> > Anyone having the same issue or any thought on getting around this?
> Since
> > there is nothing else on the network I really did not expect this type of
> > behavior.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > cd
> >
> > 
> >
> > Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. See how.
> >
> > __
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> > __
> >
> > 
> >
> > Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don't worry about storage limits.
> Check
> > it out.
> >
> > __
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> > __
> >
> > 
> > Microsoft brings you a new way to search the web. Try Bing(tm) now
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

[Paul Dardinski]

You can use an Adtran or just use any platform that will terminate the
necessary 2xT1 and 1xE1.

 

I use a 3640 w/2x HDV modules, each with a single mft (2T1, 2E1). I
don't know if you are able to look at incoming/outgoing signaling with
the Adtran, but on an IOS platform you are able to see incoming and
outgoing signaling (for troubleshooting) as well as it conforms to most
vendors labset configs. Note however that in the lab you won't be able
to access the PSTN side at all, so keep that in mind  : )

 

Paul (#16842 RS/Sec)

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of anupam
TYAGI
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 7:54 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

 

Hi , 

 

I am on the process of building home ccie voice lab . Can somebody
suggest how to go forward in building the pstn simulator ,,,

 

Thanks 

Anu

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

[Tanner Ezell]

I bought an Adtran Atlas 550, but you can also use a router.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:54 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:

> Hi ,
>
> I am on the process of building home ccie voice lab . Can somebody suggest
> how to go forward in building the pstn simulator ,,,
>
> Thanks
> Anu
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Tanner Ezell
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Trunk & Blocking Calling Name

[Sergio Polizer]

Good point. It is a simple way to do that.  Lab 5c also points to solve in this 
way.

I'm guessing the a SIP Trunk does not support block the name via CUCM config, 
but I did not find a doc. to confirm it up to now.

E.g., I tried to block the name in a SIP Trunk to Br2 and I could see the same 
behavior.
From: mciarfe...@iplogic.com
To: spoli...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:00:31 -0400
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Trunk & Blocking Calling Name










Try configuring it on the dial-peer.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Sergio Polizer 
[spoli...@hotmail.com]

Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 9:34 AM

To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Trunk & Blocking Calling Name





Hi,



I'm trying to block just the calling name via SIP trunk but when I set Calling 
Name Presentation to "restricted" it block the number also.  For MGCP and H323 
Trunks, no problems.



Something that is missing?



Thanks in advance, Sergio.




Novo Internet Explorer 8: mais rápido e muito mais seguro. 
Baixe agora, é grátis!
_
Conheça os novos produtos Windows Live! Clique aqui.
http://www.windowslive.com.br___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor

[anupam TYAGI]

Hi ,

I am on the process of building home ccie voice lab . Can somebody suggest
how to go forward in building the pstn simulator ,,,

Thanks
Anu
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?

[Aamir Panjwani]

Please refer to ipexpert vol 2 lab 3 question 5.3 for answer to this particular 
problem. 

That explains why CUE goes crazy when QOS is only configured on one PVC...




-Original Message-
From: ccieid1ot [mailto:ccieid...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, 28 September 2009 11:40 PM
To: Cisco Dave
Cc: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?

Make sure it's on both sides if you enable it.  You will need it for
QOS anyways.

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Cisco Dave  wrote:
> Yes, it was a misplaced command as seen here below. Removing that one
> command resolved my issue.
>
> interface Serial0/1/0:0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> no fair-queue
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay lmi-type ansi
>
> -Dave
>
> 
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:44:43 +1000
> From: aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au
> To: ciscod...@live.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> Dave,
>
>
>
> Are  you saying that you had to remove  "frame-relay traffic shaping"
> command from the physical interface?
>
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> From: Cisco Dave [mailto:ciscod...@live.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 26 September 2009 8:07 AM
> To: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
>
>
>
> I put a base config on both routers and ended up with the same situation.
> After a closer look I noticed a shaping command on the HQ router.  All is
> working great after removing that statement.
>
> Thanks for pointing me in the right direction,
> cd
>
>
> 
>
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:17:13 +1000
> From: aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au
> To: ciscod...@live.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> It seems to happen when you have QOS setup on one of the PVC's.  remove all
> the QOS config and try again
>
>
>
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cisco Dave
> Sent: Thursday, 24 September 2009 6:13 PM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?
>
>
>
> When setting up CUE and integrating it with CallManager my remote site
> bandwidth is choked.  Dial tone on my phones if very slow.  The integration
> itself seems to timeout.  It takes me several attempts and it is very
> slooow, pings timeout or are 2 to 3 seconds.
>
> Anyone having the same issue or any thought on getting around this?  Since
> there is nothing else on the network I really did not expect this type of
> behavior.
>
> Thanks,
> cd
>
> 
>
> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. See how.
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
> 
>
> Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don't worry about storage limits. Check
> it out.
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
> 
> Microsoft brings you a new way to search the web. Try Bing(tm) now
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com