Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Help with hware transcoding......

[Peter Slow]

All of your dialpeers use the same codec. you have to hard set the
incoming and outgoing dial-peers, to use g729 on one side, and 711 on
the other side. this is what triggers transcoder invocation in CUBE.

-Pete

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Paul Dardinski  wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> Maybe I have been staring at SecureCRT just too many hours……frankly need
> some help figuring out if I have a hardware issue or just a bonehead
> operator issue….
>
>
>
> In essence, I simply cannot get the hware transcoder to invoke on calls. I
> definitely have a fully registered profile, sccp shows fine and all seems
> right with its world. However, on incoming calls from the gk, if I set the
> codec to g729 on the incoming voip peer 2001, the call connects from UCM to
> the 3002 extension without issue. If, however, I change the incoming peer to
> g711u, then I get the fast busy on call pickup. I’ve debugged just about
> everything I can and it just seems that while the correct peers are getting
> hit, the transcoder just never answers the request. Below see the full
> config, the sh dspf all, the sh sccp, sh sdspf sess.
>
>
>
> Any ideas on why the transcoder doesn’t want to cooperate? Please feel free
> to insult me if I’m missing some super obvious point…..
>
>
>
> Paul (#16842 RS/Sec)
>
>
>
> Router#sh sccp
>
> SCCP Admin State: UP
>
> Gateway Local Interface: Loopback0
>
>     IPv4 Address: 10.10.32.3
>
>     Port Number: 2000
>
> IP Precedence: 5
>
> User Masked Codec list: None
>
> Call Manager: 10.10.32.3, Port Number: 2000
>
>     Priority: N/A, Version: 7.0, Identifier: 1
>
>     Trustpoint: N/A
>
>
>
> Transcoding Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE
>
> Active Call Manager: 10.10.32.3, Port Number: 2000
>
> TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1
>
> Reported Max Streams: 12, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
>
> Supported Codec: g711ulaw, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
>
> Supported Codec: g711alaw, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
>
> Supported Codec: g729ar8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60
>
> Supported Codec: g729abr8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60
>
> Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60
>
> Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
>
> Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30
>
> Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization
> Period: 30
>
>
>
> Router#sh dspf all
>
> Dspfarm Profile Configuration
>
>
>
>  Profile ID = 1, Service = TRANSCODING, Resource ID = 1
>
>  Profile Description :
>
>  Profile Service Mode : Non Secure
>
>  Profile Admin State : UP
>
>  Profile Operation State : ACTIVE
>
>  Application : SCCP   Status : ASSOCIATED
>
>  Resource Provider : FLEX_DSPRM   Status : UP
>
>  Number of Resource Configured : 6
>
>  Number of Resource Available : 6
>
>  Codec Configuration
>
>  Codec : g711ulaw, Maximum Packetization Period : 30
>
>  Codec : g711alaw, Maximum Packetization Period : 30
>
>  Codec : g729ar8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60
>
>  Codec : g729abr8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60
>
>  Codec : g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60
>
>
>
>
>
> SLOT DSP VERSION  STATUS CHNL USE   TYPE    RSC_ID BRIDGE_ID PKTS_TXED
> PKTS_RXED
>
>
>
> 0    1   23.8.0   UP N/A  FREE  xcode  1  - -
> -
>
> 0    1   23.8.0   UP N/A  FREE  xcode  1  - -
> -
>
> 0    1   23.8.0   UP N/A  FREE  xcode  1  - -
> -
>
> 0    1   23.8.0   UP N/A  FREE  xcode  1  - -
> -
>
> 0    2   23.8.0   UP N/A  FREE  xcode  1  - -
> -
>
> 0    2   23.8.0   UP N/A  FREE  xcode  1  - -
> -
>
>
>
> Total number of DSPFARM DSP channel(s) 6
>
>
>
> Router#sh sdspf sess
>
> Stream-ID:1 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE
>
>  usage:
>
>  codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0
>
>
>
> Stream-ID:2 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE
>
>  usage:
>
>  codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0
>
>
>
> Stream-ID:3 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE
>
>  usage:
>
>  codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0
>
>
>
> Stream-ID:4 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE
>
>  usage:
>
>  codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0
>
>
>
> Stream-ID:5 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE
>
>  usage:
>
>  codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0
>
>
>
> Stream-ID:6 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE
>
>  usage:
>
>  codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0
>
>
>
> Stream-ID:7 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE
>
>  usage:
>
>  codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0
>
>
>
> Stream-ID:8 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE
>
>  usage:
>
>  codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Router#
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Router#s
>
> Mar  1 14:11:32.037: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by consoleh
> run
>
> Building configuration...
>
>
>
> Current configuration : 5481 bytes
>
> !
>
> ! Last configuration change at 14:11:32 UTC M

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue

[anil batra]

That's what I thought, I am still getting the same error "Can not connect to IP 
Phone Agent service" anyone seen this before pls ?

--- On Mon, 1/4/10, Peter Slow  wrote:


From: Peter Slow 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue
To: "Anil Batra" 
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 8:32 AM


no... the IPAgentInitial.jsp page will prompt you for that stuff even
if you send the ID, Pwd and Ext parameters.

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Anil Batra  wrote:
>
> I m not using "single button login"
>  so do I still need to config ext and pass to
> Make it work.
>
> Sent from my iPhone!
> On Jan 3, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Jonathan Charles  wrote:
>
> It needs to point to UCCX back in the old CCIE V lab, the CCX and Pub 
> were the same box... now they aren't...
>
> The URL is right (assuming IP is right)...
>
> Is UCCX up? Did you create the Ext ID and Pwd parameters?
>
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:56 PM, anil batra  wrote:
>>
>> Intialy it wa pointed to "CMPub" when it showed " Requesting." but whne 
>> I pointed it to "UCCX" it shows..."Can not connect to IP Phone Agent service"
>>
>> - So I beleive first I was wrong pointing it to CMPub...where actually it 
>> should be pointed to UCCX right?
>>
>> - Not able to follow why after pointing to UCXX it is still giving above 
>> said error...am I still missing somehting here pls ?
>>
>>
>> --- On Mon, 1/4/10, Jonathan Charles  wrote:
>>
>> From: Jonathan Charles 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue
>> To: "anil batra" 
>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 12:11 AM
>>
>> OK, do the xx's point to CUCM or UCCX?
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:21 PM, anil batra  wrote:
>>>
>>> oopss...here we go please :
>>>
>>> http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6293/ipphone/jsp/sciphonexml/IPAgentInitial.jsp
>>>
>>> --- On Sun, 1/3/10, Jonathan Charles  wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Jonathan Charles 
>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue
>>> To: "anil batra" 
>>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>> Date: Sunday, January 3, 2010, 11:46 PM
>>>
>>> You forgot the URL
>>>
>>> Make sure it is pointing to UCCX...
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:00 PM, anil batra  wrote:

 Trying to invoke the IP Phone Agent Services  and the phone shows 
 "Requesting" and nothing happens. I have the following URL  for IP 
 phone agent service.

 Any help will be highly appreciated...

 Thanks,
 Anil

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com

>>>
>>>
>>> -Inline Attachment Follows-
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> -Inline Attachment Follows-
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Help with hware transcoding......

[Paul Dardinski]

All,

 

Maybe I have been staring at SecureCRT just too many hours..frankly
need some help figuring out if I have a hardware issue or just a
bonehead operator issue

 

In essence, I simply cannot get the hware transcoder to invoke on calls.
I definitely have a fully registered profile, sccp shows fine and all
seems right with its world. However, on incoming calls from the gk, if I
set the codec to g729 on the incoming voip peer 2001, the call connects
from UCM to the 3002 extension without issue. If, however, I change the
incoming peer to g711u, then I get the fast busy on call pickup. I've
debugged just about everything I can and it just seems that while the
correct peers are getting hit, the transcoder just never answers the
request. Below see the full config, the sh dspf all, the sh sccp, sh
sdspf sess. 

 

Any ideas on why the transcoder doesn't want to cooperate? Please feel
free to insult me if I'm missing some super obvious point.

 

Paul (#16842 RS/Sec)

 

Router#sh sccp

SCCP Admin State: UP

Gateway Local Interface: Loopback0

IPv4 Address: 10.10.32.3

Port Number: 2000

IP Precedence: 5

User Masked Codec list: None

Call Manager: 10.10.32.3, Port Number: 2000

Priority: N/A, Version: 7.0, Identifier: 1

Trustpoint: N/A

 

Transcoding Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE

Active Call Manager: 10.10.32.3, Port Number: 2000

TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1

Reported Max Streams: 12, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0

Supported Codec: g711ulaw, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: g711alaw, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: g729ar8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: g729abr8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60

Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30

Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum
Packetization Period: 30

  

Router#sh dspf all

Dspfarm Profile Configuration

 

 Profile ID = 1, Service = TRANSCODING, Resource ID = 1  

 Profile Description :  

 Profile Service Mode : Non Secure 

 Profile Admin State : UP 

 Profile Operation State : ACTIVE 

 Application : SCCP   Status : ASSOCIATED 

 Resource Provider : FLEX_DSPRM   Status : UP 

 Number of Resource Configured : 6 

 Number of Resource Available : 6

 Codec Configuration 

 Codec : g711ulaw, Maximum Packetization Period : 30 

 Codec : g711alaw, Maximum Packetization Period : 30 

 Codec : g729ar8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 

 Codec : g729abr8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 

 Codec : g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60

 

 

SLOT DSP VERSION  STATUS CHNL USE   TYPERSC_ID BRIDGE_ID PKTS_TXED
PKTS_RXED

 

01   23.8.0   UP N/A  FREE  xcode  1  - - -


01   23.8.0   UP N/A  FREE  xcode  1  - - -


01   23.8.0   UP N/A  FREE  xcode  1  - - -


01   23.8.0   UP N/A  FREE  xcode  1  - - -


02   23.8.0   UP N/A  FREE  xcode  1  - - -


02   23.8.0   UP N/A  FREE  xcode  1  - - -


 

Total number of DSPFARM DSP channel(s) 6

 

Router#sh sdspf sess

Stream-ID:1 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE   

 usage:  

 codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 

 

Stream-ID:2 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE   

 usage:  

 codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 

 

Stream-ID:3 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE   

 usage:  

 codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 

 

Stream-ID:4 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE   

 usage:  

 codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 

 

Stream-ID:5 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE   

 usage:  

 codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 

 

Stream-ID:6 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE   

 usage:  

 codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 

  

Stream-ID:7 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE   

 usage:  

 codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 

 

Stream-ID:8 mtp:1 0.0.0.0  0  Local:0 IDLE   

 usage:  

 codec:G711Ulaw64k  duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 

 

 

 

Router#

 

 

 

 

 

Router#s

Mar  1 14:11:32.037: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by
consoleh run

Building configuration...

 

Current configuration : 5481 bytes

!

! Last configuration change at 14:11:32 UTC Mon Mar 1 1993

!

version 12.4

service timestamps debug datetime msec

service timestamps log datetime msec

no service password-encryption

!

hostname Router

!

boot-start-marker

boot-end-marker

!

logging message-co

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco unity troubleshooting

[Shaaf Shah]

 I configured unity connection but when I test the voice mail, it does not go 
to the voice mail, instead I get the message "hello unity cisco voice messagng 
system, and then it says no operator available at this time. leave a general 
message. Now I have not configured unity as an auto attendant. I am thinking 
there is an issue with direct routing rules and forwarded routing rules. Any 
suggestions?

Thanks,
Shaaf


  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue

[Peter Slow]

no... the IPAgentInitial.jsp page will prompt you for that stuff even
if you send the ID, Pwd and Ext parameters.

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Anil Batra  wrote:
>
> I m not using "single button login"
>  so do I still need to config ext and pass to
> Make it work.
>
> Sent from my iPhone!
> On Jan 3, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Jonathan Charles  wrote:
>
> It needs to point to UCCX back in the old CCIE V lab, the CCX and Pub 
> were the same box... now they aren't...
>
> The URL is right (assuming IP is right)...
>
> Is UCCX up? Did you create the Ext ID and Pwd parameters?
>
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:56 PM, anil batra  wrote:
>>
>> Intialy it wa pointed to "CMPub" when it showed " Requesting." but whne 
>> I pointed it to "UCCX" it shows..."Can not connect to IP Phone Agent service"
>>
>> - So I beleive first I was wrong pointing it to CMPub...where actually it 
>> should be pointed to UCCX right?
>>
>> - Not able to follow why after pointing to UCXX it is still giving above 
>> said error...am I still missing somehting here pls ?
>>
>>
>> --- On Mon, 1/4/10, Jonathan Charles  wrote:
>>
>> From: Jonathan Charles 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue
>> To: "anil batra" 
>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 12:11 AM
>>
>> OK, do the xx's point to CUCM or UCCX?
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:21 PM, anil batra  wrote:
>>>
>>> oopss...here we go please :
>>>
>>> http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6293/ipphone/jsp/sciphonexml/IPAgentInitial.jsp
>>>
>>> --- On Sun, 1/3/10, Jonathan Charles  wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Jonathan Charles 
>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue
>>> To: "anil batra" 
>>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>> Date: Sunday, January 3, 2010, 11:46 PM
>>>
>>> You forgot the URL
>>>
>>> Make sure it is pointing to UCCX...
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:00 PM, anil batra  wrote:

 Trying to invoke the IP Phone Agent Services  and the phone shows 
 "Requesting" and nothing happens. I have the following URL  for IP 
 phone agent service.

 Any help will be highly appreciated...

 Thanks,
 Anil

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com

>>>
>>>
>>> -Inline Attachment Follows-
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> -Inline Attachment Follows-
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number

[Robert McGhee]

Thanks a lot Peter! 


-Original Message-
From: Peter Slow [mailto:peter.s...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 9:39 PM
To: Robert McGhee
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number

You dont see it because your call isnt redirected =) when you hit the
messages button, you're making a direct call. in all likelihood, your
call is getting to the VM pilot with its full caller ID. unity is
going to need to see the call as comign from the approriate 4-digit
extension for it to recognize you as a subscriber. what you need to do
is change your calling party number in between the point where the
call comes back in the HQQ Gateway and gets to the VM port. you can
accomplish this with the calling party transform mask on the hunt
pilot or through the use of a translation pattern. There is probably
at least one other way to do it.

-Pete

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Robert McGhee 
wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>     I’m trying some variations to the IPX volume 2 labs and
there’s
> a section that requires a branch site to maintain voicemail functionality
> while in SRST mode (press the message button and get prompted for pin not
> userID).  In the workbook they do this using an alternative extension in
> CUC.  Is it also possible to do this by configuring the SRST gateway to
send
> the redirecting number in the IE messages and also for the HQ gateway to
> accept the redirecting IE messages?  I tried setting this up in my home
lab
> but can’t seem to pass the redirecting IE messages; I don’t see it at all
> when debugging isdn q931 on the SRST gateway.  The only configuration I
have
> on that router is “isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number” under serial
> interface of the PRI; do I need anything else?  Should I see the
redirecting
> number in those debugs and can this work?
>
>
>
> Thank you….
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number

[Peter Slow]

You dont see it because your call isnt redirected =) when you hit the
messages button, you're making a direct call. in all likelihood, your
call is getting to the VM pilot with its full caller ID. unity is
going to need to see the call as comign from the approriate 4-digit
extension for it to recognize you as a subscriber. what you need to do
is change your calling party number in between the point where the
call comes back in the HQQ Gateway and gets to the VM port. you can
accomplish this with the calling party transform mask on the hunt
pilot or through the use of a translation pattern. There is probably
at least one other way to do it.

-Pete

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Robert McGhee  wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>     I’m trying some variations to the IPX volume 2 labs and there’s
> a section that requires a branch site to maintain voicemail functionality
> while in SRST mode (press the message button and get prompted for pin not
> userID).  In the workbook they do this using an alternative extension in
> CUC.  Is it also possible to do this by configuring the SRST gateway to send
> the redirecting number in the IE messages and also for the HQ gateway to
> accept the redirecting IE messages?  I tried setting this up in my home lab
> but can’t seem to pass the redirecting IE messages; I don’t see it at all
> when debugging isdn q931 on the SRST gateway.  The only configuration I have
> on that router is “isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number” under serial
> interface of the PRI; do I need anything else?  Should I see the redirecting
> number in those debugs and can this work?
>
>
>
> Thank you….
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number

[Robert McGhee]

 

Hi All,

 

I'm trying some variations to the IPX volume 2 labs and there's
a section that requires a branch site to maintain voicemail functionality
while in SRST mode (press the message button and get prompted for pin not
userID).  In the workbook they do this using an alternative extension in
CUC.  Is it also possible to do this by configuring the SRST gateway to send
the redirecting number in the IE messages and also for the HQ gateway to
accept the redirecting IE messages?  I tried setting this up in my home lab
but can't seem to pass the redirecting IE messages; I don't see it at all
when debugging isdn q931 on the SRST gateway.  The only configuration I have
on that router is "isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number" under serial
interface of the PRI; do I need anything else?  Should I see the redirecting
number in those debugs and can this work?

 

Thank you..

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home Lab - Minimum PVDM2's Needed

[Bryan Brooks]

I am just getting started in my pursuit of the lab and I was curious what
the minimum amount of pvdm2's at each site would be in order to successfully
accomplish the labs on my home lab?  I am using IPexperts lab manuals for
V3.  My home lab is basically setup like proctor labs with a few
substitutes.  I am still in the process of piecing it together and was
trying to determine the best approach would be or if I should use rented
rack time?

Thanks in advance.

Bryan Brooks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue

[Anil Batra]

I m not using "single button login"
 so do I still need to config ext and pass to 
Make it work.


Sent from my iPhone!

On Jan 3, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Jonathan Charles  wrote:

It needs to point to UCCX back in the old CCIE V lab, the CCX and Pub were 
the same box... now they aren't...

The URL is right (assuming IP is right)...

Is UCCX up? Did you create the Ext ID and Pwd parameters?

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:56 PM, anil batra  wrote:
Intialy it wa pointed to "CMPub" when it showed " Requesting." but whne I 
pointed it to "UCCX" it shows..."Can not connect to IP Phone Agent service"
 
- So I beleive first I was wrong pointing it to CMPub...where actually it 
should be pointed to UCCX right?
 
- Not able to follow why after pointing to UCXX it is still giving above said 
error...am I still missing somehting here pls ?
 


--- On Mon, 1/4/10, Jonathan Charles  wrote:

From: Jonathan Charles 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue
To: "anil batra" 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 12:11 AM


OK, do the xx's point to CUCM or UCCX?

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:21 PM, anil batra  wrote:
oopss...here we go please :
 
http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6293/ipphone/jsp/sciphonexml/IPAgentInitial.jsp

--- On Sun, 1/3/10, Jonathan Charles  wrote:

From: Jonathan Charles 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue
To: "anil batra" 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Sunday, January 3, 2010, 11:46 PM


You forgot the URL

Make sure it is pointing to UCCX...


Jonathan

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:00 PM, anil batra  wrote:
Trying to invoke the IP Phone Agent Services  and the phone shows 
"Requesting" and nothing happens. I have the following URL  for IP phone 
agent service.
 
Any help will be highly appreciated...
 
Thanks,
Anil


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



-Inline Attachment Follows-


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



-Inline Attachment Follows-

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue

[Jonathan Charles]

It needs to point to UCCX back in the old CCIE V lab, the CCX and Pub
were the same box... now they aren't...

The URL is right (assuming IP is right)...

Is UCCX up? Did you create the Ext ID and Pwd parameters?

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:56 PM, anil batra  wrote:

> Intialy it wa pointed to "CMPub" when it showed " Requesting." but whne
> I pointed it to "UCCX" it shows..."Can not connect to IP Phone Agent
> service"
>
> - So I beleive first I was wrong pointing it to CMPub...where actually it
> should be pointed to UCCX right?
>
> - Not able to follow why after pointing to UCXX it is still giving above
> said error...am I still missing somehting here pls ?
>
>
>
> --- On *Mon, 1/4/10, Jonathan Charles * wrote:
>
>
> From: Jonathan Charles 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue
> To: "anil batra" 
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 12:11 AM
>
>
> OK, do the xx's point to CUCM or UCCX?
>
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:21 PM, anil batra 
> http://us.mc379.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=anil...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
>
>>   oopss...here we go please :
>>
>> http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6293/*ipphone*/*jsp*/*sciphonexml*/*IPAgentInitial
>> *.*jsp*
>>
>> --- On *Sun, 1/3/10, Jonathan Charles 
>> http://us.mc379.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=jonv...@gmail.com>
>> >* wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Jonathan Charles 
>> http://us.mc379.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=jonv...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue
>> To: "anil batra" 
>> http://us.mc379.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=anil...@yahoo.com>
>> >
>> Cc: 
>> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Date: Sunday, January 3, 2010, 11:46 PM
>>
>>
>> You forgot the URL
>>
>> Make sure it is pointing to UCCX...
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:00 PM, anil batra 
>> http://us.mc379.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=anil...@yahoo.com>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>   Trying to invoke the IP Phone Agent Services  and the phone shows
>>> "Requesting" and nothing happens. I have the following URL  for IP phone
>>> agent service.
>>>
>>> Any help will be highly appreciated...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Anil
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -Inline Attachment Follows-
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>
>
> -Inline Attachment Follows-
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] URL to GUI for CUPS (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Amp]

Hey Jeffery,
See if one of these links has what you're looking for.

http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cisco_Unified_Presence%2C_Release_7.x
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cisco_Unified_Presence,_Release_7.x_--_Configuration_and_Maintenance_of_Cisco_Unified_Presence

Amp

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue

[anil batra]

Intialy it wa pointed to "CMPub" when it showed " Requesting." but whne I 
pointed it to "UCCX" it shows..."Can not connect to IP Phone Agent service" 
 
- So I beleive first I was wrong pointing it to CMPub...where actually it 
should be pointed to UCCX right? 
 
- Not able to follow why after pointing to UCXX it is still giving above said 
error...am I still missing somehting here pls ?
 


--- On Mon, 1/4/10, Jonathan Charles  wrote:


From: Jonathan Charles 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue
To: "anil batra" 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 12:11 AM


OK, do the xx's point to CUCM or UCCX?


On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:21 PM, anil batra  wrote:






oopss...here we go please :
 
http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6293/ipphone/jsp/sciphonexml/IPAgentInitial.jsp

--- On Sun, 1/3/10, Jonathan Charles  wrote:


From: Jonathan Charles 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue
To: "anil batra" 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Sunday, January 3, 2010, 11:46 PM





You forgot the URL

Make sure it is pointing to UCCX...


Jonathan


On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:00 PM, anil batra  wrote:






Trying to invoke the IP Phone Agent Services  and the phone shows 
"Requesting" and nothing happens. I have the following URL  for IP phone 
agent service.
 
Any help will be highly appreciated...
 
Thanks,
Anil

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



-Inline Attachment Follows-



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



-Inline Attachment Follows-


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue

[Jonathan Charles]

OK, do the xx's point to CUCM or UCCX?

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:21 PM, anil batra  wrote:

> oopss...here we go please :
>
> http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6293/*ipphone*/*jsp*/*sciphonexml*/*IPAgentInitial*
> .*jsp*
>
> --- On *Sun, 1/3/10, Jonathan Charles * wrote:
>
>
> From: Jonathan Charles 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue
> To: "anil batra" 
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Sunday, January 3, 2010, 11:46 PM
>
>
> You forgot the URL
>
> Make sure it is pointing to UCCX...
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:00 PM, anil batra 
> http://us.mc379.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=anil...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
>
>>   Trying to invoke the IP Phone Agent Services  and the phone shows
>> "Requesting" and nothing happens. I have the following URL  for IP phone
>> agent service.
>>
>> Any help will be highly appreciated...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Anil
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
> -Inline Attachment Follows-
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue

[anil batra]

oopss...here we go please :
 
http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6293/ipphone/jsp/sciphonexml/IPAgentInitial.jsp

--- On Sun, 1/3/10, Jonathan Charles  wrote:


From: Jonathan Charles 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue
To: "anil batra" 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Sunday, January 3, 2010, 11:46 PM


You forgot the URL

Make sure it is pointing to UCCX...


Jonathan


On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:00 PM, anil batra  wrote:






Trying to invoke the IP Phone Agent Services  and the phone shows 
"Requesting" and nothing happens. I have the following URL  for IP phone 
agent service.
 
Any help will be highly appreciated...
 
Thanks,
Anil

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



-Inline Attachment Follows-


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue

[Jonathan Charles]

You forgot the URL

Make sure it is pointing to UCCX...


Jonathan

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:00 PM, anil batra  wrote:

> Trying to invoke the IP Phone Agent Services  and the phone shows
> "Requesting" and nothing happens. I have the following URL  for IP phone
> agent service.
>
> Any help will be highly appreciated...
>
> Thanks,
> Anil
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX - IP Phobe Agent Service Issue

[anil batra]

Trying to invoke the IP Phone Agent Services  and the phone shows 
"Requesting" and nothing happens. I have the following URL  for IP phone 
agent service.
 
Any help will be highly appreciated...
 
Thanks,
Anil


  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Connectivity Issue - Proctor Labs

[Berry, Matthew J.]

I am experiencing an odd connectivity issue.  I will be connected into Proctor 
Labs working away at the routers, 3750 switch, and CUCMs.  Then, all of the 
sudden, I will lose my ability to connect to the CUCM webpages.  On further 
investigation, it seems that the route to 10.10.210.0/24 subnet is lost on my 
local router.

The only workaround is to completely reload my router and establish the EZVPN 
connection back into Proctor Labs.

Has anyone experienced this issue?  Does anyone have ideas for a fix?

Thanks,
Matthew Berry

Digital Footprint:
Skype: ciscovoiceguru

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD problem in CME

[bkvalentine]

BACD gives these normal errors.  Have you tried it?  Does it work?  I suggest 
ignoring the errors until you try it to see if it works.

Brian


Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: "A. Venkatesan" 
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 20:31:10 
To: 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD problem in CME

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD problem in CME

[A. Venkatesan]

Hi all,
Can some one help me to sort the issue please?
 
While i am entering the command in CME router for BACD i am getting the 
following error
BR2-RTR(config)# application
BR2-RTR(config-app)#
service aa flash:app-b-acd-aa-2.1.2.2.tcl
  paramspace english index 1
  param number-of-hunt-grps 2
  param handoff-string aa
  paramspace english language en
  param max-time-vm-retry 2
  param aa-pilot 3500
  paramspace english location flash:
  param second-greeting-time 60
  param welcome-prompt _bacd_welcome.au
  param call-retry-timer 15
  param voice-mail 53002
  param max-time-call-retry 90
  param service-name queue
 
BR2-RTR(config-app-param)#param number-of-hunt-grps 2
Warning: parameter number-of-hunt-grps has not been registered under aa 
namespace

BR2-RTR(config-app-param)#param handoff-string aa
Warning: parameter handoff-string has not been registered under aa namespace

BR2-RTR(config-app-param)#param max-time-vm-retry 2
Warning: parameter max-time-vm-retry has not been registered under aa namespace

After enter the above commands, the debugging is giving me the following.
 
Jan  3 13:26:58.660: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_ifs_cb: hifs ifs file read succeeded. 
size=35485, url=flash:app-b-acd-aa-2.1.2.2.tcl
Jan  3 13:26:58.660: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata: 0x69716A1C
Jan  3 13:26:58.660: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata: 0x69716A1C
Jan  3 13:26:58.684: //-1//TCL :EE708434F:/tcl_PutsObjCmd: TCL AA: -- 
ERROR: Mandatory parameter aa-pilot does not exist --
Jan  3 13:26:58.684: //-1//TCL :EE708434F:/tcl_PutsObjCmd: TCL AA: -- 
ERROR: Mandatory parameter service-name does not exist --
Jan  3 13:26:58.684: //-1//TCL :EE708434F:/tcl_PutsObjCmd: TCL AA: -- 
ERROR: Mandatory parameter handoff-string does not exist --
Jan  3 13:26:58.684: //-1//TCL :EE708434F:/tcl_PutsObjCmd: TCL AA: -- 
ERROR: Mandatory parameter voice-mail does not exist --
Jan  3 13:26:58.684: //-1//TCL :EE708434F:/tcl_PutsObjCmd: TCL AA: -- 
max-extension-length is set to default value of 5 --
Jan  3 13:26:58.688: //-1//TCL :EE708434F:/tcl_PutsObjCmd: TCL AA: -- 
Mandatory parameter second-greeting-time does not exist --
Jan  3 13:26:58.688: //-1//TCL :EE708434F:/tcl_PutsObjCmd: TCL AA: -- 
Setting default to 60
Jan  3 13:26:58.688: //-1//TCL :EE708434F:/tcl_PutsObjCmd: TCL AA: -- 
Mandatory parameter second-greeting-time does not exist --
Jan  3 13:26:58.688: //-1//TCL :EE708434F:/tcl_PutsObjCmd: TCL AA: -- 
Setting default to 15
Jan  3 13:26:58.688: //-1//TCL :EE708434F:/tcl_PutsObjCmd: TCL AA: -- 
Mandatory parameter max-time-vm-retry does not exist --
Jan  3 13:26:58.688: //-1//TCL :EE708434F:/tcl_PutsObjCmd: TCL AA: -- 
Setting default to 1
Jan  3 13:26:58.688: //-1//TCL :EE708434F:/tcl_PutsObjCmd: TCL AA: -- 
Mandatory parameter number-of-hunt-grps does not exist
Jan  3 13:26:58.688: //-1//TCL :EE708434F:/tcl_PutsObjCmd: TCL AA: -- 
Setting default to 3
 
Thanking you everybody,
 
 
Regards,
 
Venkat A.


  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM and CME-SRST issue

[Ahmed Ellboudy]

Dear All ,

I have a CCM version 7.0 on site A and two H.323  Voice gateways on site
B , the connection between Site A and site B is a VPN on the Internet
and we used the two VG as CME in case of the VPN down (CME-SRST)  ,but I
face a problem that the Phones take a long time to register on the CME
(about 5 minutes) ,Is there any command adjust this time.

Also when the VPN reconnect the phones did not sense that the connection
is reestablished , and I must reset the phones to register again on the
CCM , is there anything to be add to make the registration automatic?


 

Thanks and BR,

 

Ahmed Ellboudy

Network Team leader

Raya IT,6th of October behind Dar El-foud Hospital

Mobile:+20100770837 

Office:+20238276000 ext:2338

Mail:ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.com  

 

Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is confidential 
and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in 
error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The 
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly 
forbidden. Raya will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or 
consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message 
by a third party or as a result of any malicious code or virus being passed on. 
Views expressed in this communication are not necessarily those of Raya.If you 
have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by 
email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original message. 
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.X Auto Registration issues...

[bkvalentine]

Try stopping the ccm service on your SUB and see if the phones can register 
okay.  This is a lab deployment, correct?  It sure looks like a replication 
issue to me, even though the cucm isn't reporting one.

Brian

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: Alex Hannah 
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 04:29:58 
To: 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.X Auto Registration issues...

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP phones

[Peter Weeks]

Hi

Debug tftp events shows the correct files being downloaded infact that was the 
debug included with my mail.  The SIP upgrade has worked fine unfortunately the 
phones won't register with the cme.

Peter 

-Original Message-
From: bkvalent...@gmail.com [mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 3. januar 2010 13:20
To: Peter Weeks; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com; 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP phones

You might want to make sure you have all the necessary configuration files 
served up via tftp.  Also try running "debug tftp events".  Also, try upgrading 
it using CUCM, , which is faster and more reliable that doing so via CME.



Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: Peter Weeks 
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 10:31:11 
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP phones

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP phones

[bkvalentine]

You might want to make sure you have all the necessary configuration files 
served up via tftp.  Also try running "debug tftp events".  Also, try upgrading 
it using CUCM, , which is faster and more reliable that doing so via CME.



Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: Peter Weeks 
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 10:31:11 
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP phones

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.X Auto Registration issues...

[Thomas Bader]

Alex,
are you using used phones? If yes, they might have been used in a
secured cluster and the phones will registger nowhere else. Perform a
factory reset and try again.

regards,

Thomas
  -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
  Von: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]im Auftrag von Alex
Hannah
  Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. Januar 2010 10:30
  An: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Betreff: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.X Auto Registration issues...


  Guys,

  I have a CUCM 7.x cluster ( 7.1(2) ) with a Pub and a Sub with the Sub
being the primary server for phones to register to via the CM Group, and
auto registration is turned on for the Sub.  DHCP is running on the Pub,
the phones get an IP Address, and download the firmware fine, when they
attempt to register to the CUCM Server something very strange occurs.
It seems like the phone registers for a split second and then I get the
"registration rejected" message.  The phone then attempts to register
again and for a split second I see it register, then I recieve the
"registration rejected" message.

  If I click on the Settings > Status > Status Messages, I see the
following.

  4:19:58a SEPXXX.cnf.xml
  4:19:58a No CTL Installed
  4:19:58a No IPv4 TFTP Server
  4:19:58a File Not Found: CTLFile.tlv
  4:19:58a No IPv4 DNS Server

  Under the DHCP Scope for each subnet that I have IP Phones in ( HQ in
this case ), I have option 150 pointing to the PUB at 142.100.64.11.

  I have reset the TFTP Server and I have since stopped the CUCM Service
on the Pub to force the phones to register via the Sub.

  I thought to check the DB Replication to see if that was hosed up
somehow, but it looks okay I think:

  admin:utils dbre
  admin:utils dbreplication status

    utils dbreplication status 
  Replication status check is now running in background.
  Use command 'utils dbreplication runtimestate' to check its progress
  The final output will be in file
cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2010_01_03_04_23_18.out
  Please use "file view activelog
cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2010_01_03_04_23_18.out " command to
see the output
  admin:file view activelog
cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2010_01_03_04_23_18.out
  SERVER ID STATESTATUS QUEUE  CONNECTION
CHANGED
  --
-
  g_esx_pub1_ccm7_1_2_2_22 Active   Connected   0 Jan  2
21:22:57
  g_esx_sub1_ccm7_1_2_2_24 Active   Local   0
  end of the file reached
  options: q=quit, n=next, p=prev, b=begin, e=end (lines 1 - 4 of 4) :


  Any thoughts?

  Alex
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.X Auto Registration issues...

[Peter Weeks]

Hi Alex

I have had similar issues on earlier versions of Call manager but I haven't 
always been able to explain what happens.  I think you may need to point the 
option 150 to the subscriber and not the publisher.  If this is just a test 
installation the try a manual config of the phone as a check.  I have found 
that the auto config CUCM should be the same as the option 150.

I hope this helps

Peter

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Alex Hannah
Sent: 3. januar 2010 10:30
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.X Auto Registration issues...

Guys,

I have a CUCM 7.x cluster ( 7.1(2) ) with a Pub and a Sub with the Sub being 
the primary server for phones to register to via the CM Group, and auto 
registration is turned on for the Sub.  DHCP is running on the Pub, the phones 
get an IP Address, and download the firmware fine, when they attempt to 
register to the CUCM Server something very strange occurs.  It seems like the 
phone registers for a split second and then I get the "registration rejected" 
message.  The phone then attempts to register again and for a split second I 
see it register, then I recieve the "registration rejected" message.

If I click on the Settings > Status > Status Messages, I see the following.

4:19:58a SEPXXX.cnf.xml
4:19:58a No CTL Installed
4:19:58a No IPv4 TFTP Server
4:19:58a File Not Found: CTLFile.tlv
4:19:58a No IPv4 DNS Server

Under the DHCP Scope for each subnet that I have IP Phones in ( HQ in this case 
), I have option 150 pointing to the PUB at 142.100.64.11.

I have reset the TFTP Server and I have since stopped the CUCM Service on the 
Pub to force the phones to register via the Sub.

I thought to check the DB Replication to see if that was hosed up somehow, but 
it looks okay I think:

admin:utils dbre
admin:utils dbreplication status

  utils dbreplication status 
Replication status check is now running in background.
Use command 'utils dbreplication runtimestate' to check its progress
The final output will be in file 
cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2010_01_03_04_23_18.out
Please use "file view activelog 
cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2010_01_03_04_23_18.out " command to see the 
output
admin:file view activelog 
cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2010_01_03_04_23_18.out
SERVER ID STATESTATUS QUEUE  CONNECTION CHANGED
---
g_esx_pub1_ccm7_1_2_2_22 Active   Connected   0 Jan  2 21:22:57
g_esx_sub1_ccm7_1_2_2_24 Active   Local   0
end of the file reached
options: q=quit, n=next, p=prev, b=begin, e=end (lines 1 - 4 of 4) :


Any thoughts?

Alex

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP phones

[Peter Weeks]

Hi

A similar problem to one already posted but the suggestions I found in the 
achieve don't appear to work.

My 7960 has come up as a SIP phone but it keep downloading its configuration 
file every few seconds.
There doesn't appear to be a dhcp issue the sccp phone is fine and the lease 
time is 8 days.  I have tried removing the voice register pool commands and 
reconfiguring the phone.  I have even booted the br1 router.  Any ideas?

Jan  3 09:27:28.332: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001121115FAF.cnf, time 00:00:00 
for process 231
Jan  3 09:27:28.612: TFTP: Looking for SIP003094C2E72E.cnf
Jan  3 09:27:28.612: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP003094C2E72E.cnf, fd 7, size 1237 
for process 231
Jan  3 09:27:28.704: TFTP: Looking for SIP001794DFF9D7.cnf
Jan  3 09:27:28.708: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001794DFF9D7.cnf, fd 8, size 1237 
for process 265
Jan  3 09:27:28.716: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001794DFF9D7.cnf, time 00:00:00 
for process 265
Jan  3 09:27:29.156: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP003094C2E72E.cnf, time 00:00:00 
for process 231
BR2-RTR#
Jan  3 09:27:29.736: TFTP: Looking for SIP001121115FAF.cnf
Jan  3 09:27:29.740: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001121115FAF.cnf, fd 7, size 1237 
for process 231
Jan  3 09:27:30.148: TFTP: Looking for SIP001794DFF9D7.cnf
Jan  3 09:27:30.152: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001794DFF9D7.cnf, fd 8, size 1237 
for process 265
Jan  3 09:27:30.160: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001794DFF9D7.cnf, time 00:00:00 
for process 265
Jan  3 09:27:30.284: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001121115FAF.cnf, time 00:00:00 
for process 231
Jan  3 09:27:30.608: TFTP: Looking for SIP003094C2E72E.cnf
Jan  3 09:27:30.612: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP003094C2E72E.cnf, fd 7, size 1237 
for process 231
BR2-RTR#
Jan  3 09:27:31.108: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP003094C2E72E.cnf, time 00:00:00 
for process 231
Jan  3 09:27:31.504: TFTP: Looking for SIP001794DFF9D7.cnf
Jan  3 09:27:31.508: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001794DFF9D7.cnf, fd 7, size 1237 
for process 231
Jan  3 09:27:31.520: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001794DFF9D7.cnf, time 00:00:00 
for process 231
Jan  3 09:27:31.736: TFTP: Looking for SIP001121115FAF.cnf
Jan  3 09:27:31.740: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001121115FAF.cnf, fd 7, size 1237 
for process 231
BR2-RTR#u all
Jan  3 09:27:32.232: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001121115FAF.cnf, time 00:00:00 
for process 231
Jan  3 09:27:32.608: TFTP: Looking for SIP003094C2E72E.cnf
Jan  3 09:27:32.612: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP003094C2E72E.cnf, fd 7, size 1237 
for process 231
Jan  3 09:27:32.804: TFTP: Looking for SIP001794DFF9D7.cnf
Jan  3 09:27:32.804: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001794DFF9D7.cnf, fd 8, size 1237 
for process 265
Jan  3 09:27:32.816: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001794DFF9D7.cnf, time 00:00:00 
for process 265
Jan  3 09:27:33.104: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP003094C2E72E.cnf, time 00:00:00 
for process 231
All possible debugging has been turned off
BR2-RTR#
Jan  3 09:27:33.736: TFTP: Looking for SIP001121115FAF.cnf
Jan  3 09:27:33.740: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001121115FAF.cnf, fd 7, size 1237 
for process 231
Jan  3 09:27:34.232: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001121115FAF.cnf, time 00:00:00 
for process 231


Peter Weeks
Senior System Engineer
CCIE #14880 SP

Grenseveien 95

Pb. 6528 Etterstad

0606 Oslo


peter.we...@datametrix.no
www.datametrix.no

Mobil:

+47 47915821

Sentralbord:

+47 23035900

Telefaks:

+47 23035901


[cid:image001.jpg@01CA8C5F.9D926800]

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail & its attachments.

<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.X Auto Registration issues...

[Alex Hannah]

Guys,

I have a CUCM 7.x cluster ( 7.1(2) ) with a Pub and a Sub with the Sub being
the primary server for phones to register to via the CM Group, and auto
registration is turned on for the Sub.  DHCP is running on the Pub, the
phones get an IP Address, and download the firmware fine, when they attempt
to register to the CUCM Server something very strange occurs.  It seems like
the phone registers for a split second and then I get the "registration
rejected" message.  The phone then attempts to register again and for a
split second I see it register, then I recieve the "registration rejected"
message.

If I click on the Settings > Status > Status Messages, I see the following.

4:19:58a SEPXXX.cnf.xml
4:19:58a No CTL Installed
4:19:58a No IPv4 TFTP Server
4:19:58a File Not Found: CTLFile.tlv
4:19:58a No IPv4 DNS Server

Under the DHCP Scope for each subnet that I have IP Phones in ( HQ in this
case ), I have option 150 pointing to the PUB at 142.100.64.11.

I have reset the TFTP Server and I have since stopped the CUCM Service on
the Pub to force the phones to register via the Sub.

I thought to check the DB Replication to see if that was hosed up somehow,
but it looks okay I think:

admin:utils dbre
admin:utils dbreplication status

  utils dbreplication status 
Replication status check is now running in background.
Use command 'utils dbreplication runtimestate' to check its progress
The final output will be in file
cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2010_01_03_04_23_18.out
Please use "file view activelog
cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2010_01_03_04_23_18.out " command to see
the output
admin:file view activelog
cm/trace/dbl/sdi/ReplicationStatus.2010_01_03_04_23_18.out
SERVER ID STATESTATUS QUEUE  CONNECTION CHANGED
---
g_esx_pub1_ccm7_1_2_2_22 Active   Connected   0 Jan  2 21:22:57
g_esx_sub1_ccm7_1_2_2_24 Active   Local   0
end of the file reached
options: q=quit, n=next, p=prev, b=begin, e=end (lines 1 - 4 of 4) :


Any thoughts?

Alex
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 2

[Peter Weeks]

Hi!

I have some issues with ringing between HQ and BR1.  When I ring 1002 from 5002 
the calls goes through but when I answer the call it continues ringing on 5002 
whilst 1002 assumes it is connected.  After a short while the 1002 resets and 
tells me that the Call manager is down.  Any suggestions?

Phone 1002 also resets every now and again for no reason that I can see.


Peter Weeks
Senior System Engineer
CCIE #14880 SP

Grenseveien 95

Pb. 6528 Etterstad

0606 Oslo


peter.we...@datametrix.no
www.datametrix.no

Mobil:

+47 47915821

Sentralbord:

+47 23035900

Telefaks:

+47 23035901


[cid:image001.jpg@01CA8C5E.DDF13F30]

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail & its attachments.

<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.1(2) - Apply Config Button?

[Alex Hannah]

Guys,

I have a very stupid question regarding CUCM 7.1(X) and the new "Apply
Config" button.  In regards to phones... if you configure the device then
the line on a phone, what the heck is the difference in "resetting" vs
"apply config"?  It looks to me after reading the description of the apply
config button that is performs more a restart than a reset.  Under what
circumstances would you use this in regards to a phone?

Thanks,

Alex
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com