Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Recommended Version of CME for CCIE Voice Lab
Hi, according to what I have been able to understand you will get these versions in the lab. CUCM 7.0.1 CME 7.0.1 (IOS 12.4.22T) UC 7.0.1 CUPS 7.0 UCCX 7.0.1 CUE 7.0 A pretty safe bet is that the version used @ Proctorlabs will be the one that we can expect to get in the lab. Brgds, Roger Källberg Consultant Cygate AB Från: Berry, Matthew J. [mjbe...@krollontrack.com] Skickat: den 25 januari 2010 02:25 Till: Cristobal Priego; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Kopia: Vik Malhi Ämne: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Recommended Version of CME for CCIE Voice Lab Cristobal mentioned that he is using CME 7.1.1.0 in his lab. According to the lab blueprint, it seems that the version that will be on the lab is CME 7.0. Is this correct? Are minor releases supported in the labs? For example, could we be tested on CUCM 7.1(2) and the new features that are added in this release? Otto/Vik, could you respond to this one? Thanks, Matthew Berry Office 952 516 3748 | Mobile 952 221 2814| mjbe...@krollontrack.commailto:agutz...@krollontrack.com From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cristobal Priego Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 11:46 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCME and SNR Hello all, I have a little issue here, hopefully you can help me out I have CME 7.1.1.0 installed and I have SNR on a few extensions configured working great, my problem starts when a call is connected on an extension that has SNR enabled, when i press the mobility soft key to transfer the call to my remote destination device (my cell phone) nothing happens i can't transfer the call. also as soon as i press the mobility soft key this is what i see on cme cli 000918: Jan 22 17:41:36.099: fStationSoftKeyEventMessage 6316 unknown press mobility key 37 could you point me on the right direction to resolve this thank you ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco introduces new CCNP and SP Track
Interesting read In response to growing demand for highly qualified professionals capable of designing, implementing, securing and operating increasingly sophisticated networks and technical infrastructure, Cisco today announced a new Service Provider (SP) Operations certification track as well as a major revision of its popular CCNP® certification. http://www.ccietalk.com/2010/01/25/cisco-introduces-new-ccnp-and-sp-track -- www.ccietalk.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS solutions in PG CCIE Voice v3. Vol. 2 Lab 2 6.3
I agree. Third bullit should be srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 2 5 5 And If We use auto qos maybe We should map dscp-map queue as well. According QoS SRND (2-58), DSCP-to-Queue/Threshold maps override CoS-to-Queue/Threshold maps. Or no mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map. May Someone give a help on this? Sergio. From: basmj...@msn.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:16:27 +0100 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS solutions in PG CCIE Voice v3. Vol. 2 Lab 2 6.3 Today I worked on la 2 of Vol. 2. I am confused about the solution given in the PG for question 6.3 - Signaling traffic should be placed in the second queue, PG mentiones only cos-map. Shouldn't this be done for the dsp-map as well? - Third bullit: adjust SRR so that Q2 shapes to 50% of the interface bandwith. PG answer: ... shape 10 50 20 20 I am confused because the Enterprise QoS SRND states that shape mode overrides shared mode and shape mode uses an inversed ratio weigth. So, if I follow this, I would choose 10 2 5 5 Below an example from the QoS design guide. CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% (and works in shared mode) CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 ! Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW Hope somebody can clarify this. Thanks in advance. kind regards, Bas Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they e-mail you. _ Sabia que você tem 25Gb de armazenamento grátis na web? Conheça o Skydrive agora. http://www.windowslive.com.br/public/product.aspx/view/5?ocid=CRM-WindowsLive:produtoSkyDrive:Tagline:WLCRM:On:WL:pt-BR:SkyDrive___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS solutions in PG CCIE Voice v3. Vol. 2 Lab 2 6.3
Hi Bas, Sergio, I agree, although the internal dscp to cos map should be used to deduct the cos value and hence the queue and threshold values through the mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue settings, the SRND states (as Sergio noticed), that mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue settings will take precedence. I think the only way cos to queue map will take effect is that dscp to queue maps are set to default using the command Sergio references. In consequence, as SRND itself recommends configure both dscp and cos queue maps to keep consistency, I also agree that shaping Q2 to 50% is configured as srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 *2* 5 5 as these are absolute values (1/2=0.5*100=50%) and not relatives as when calculating shared ratios, BR, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Sergio Polizer spoli...@hotmail.comwrote: I agree. Third bullit should be srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 2 5 5 And If We use auto qos maybe We should map dscp-map queue as well. According QoS SRND (2-58), DSCP-to-Queue/Threshold maps override CoS-to-Queue/Threshold maps. Or no mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map. May Someone give a help on this? Sergio. -- From: basmj...@msn.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:16:27 +0100 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS solutions in PG CCIE Voice v3. Vol. 2 Lab 2 6.3 Today I worked on la 2 of Vol. 2. I am confused about the solution given in the PG for question 6.3 - Signaling traffic should be placed in the second queue, PG mentiones only cos-map. Shouldn't this be done for the dsp-map as well? - Third bullit: adjust SRR so that Q2 shapes to 50% of the interface bandwith. PG answer: ... shape 10 50 20 20 I am confused because the Enterprise QoS SRND states that shape mode overrides shared mode and shape mode uses an inversed ratio weigth. So, if I follow this, I would choose 10 2 5 5 Below an example from the QoS design guide. CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% (and works in shared mode) CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 ! Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW Hope somebody can clarify this. Thanks in advance. kind regards, Bas -- Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they e-mail you.http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_3:092010 -- Quer fazer um álbum íncrivel? Conheça o Windows Live Fotos clicando aqui.http://www.eutenhomaisnowindowslive.com.br/?utm_source=MSN_Hotmailutm_medium=Taglineutm_campaign=InfuseSocial ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Regards, Otto Sanchez CCIE #25592 (Voice) Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question in regards to SCCP and SIP
Hello Cristobal, I would recommend the following reading so you can make the better decision according to your environment: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/srnd/design/guide/multcme.html HTH, On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, i just have a question that hopefully with all of your comments i can undersdand this is the scenario. a connection between a cme and uc520. the phones registered to both routers are running SCCP. is there a reason why you want to configure the voip dial-peers that will allow the connectivity between routers to be SIP dial-peers instead of dial-peers ? i don't understand why you want to use sip dial-peers if all your phones and all your environment is SCCP thank you for your comments ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Regards, Otto Sanchez CCIE #25592 (Voice) Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS solutions in PG CCIE Voice v3. Vol. 2 Lab 2 6.3
I had a similar question relating to the qos. Below is an example from SRND where the first queue is limited to 1/3 of the available bandwidth and then the Q1 is enabled as priority queue with teh priority-queue out command. But IOS reference guide for 3560 says that if we enable priority-queue out command then it will override the srr-queue bandwidth share and srr-queue bandwidth shape commands. Can some one help on this one? Shaaf CAT2970(config)#interface range GigabitEthernet0/1 - 28 CAT2970(config-if-range)# queue-set 1 ! Assigns interface to Queue-Set 1 (default) CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 ! Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW CAT2970(config-if-range)# priority-queue out ! Q1 is enabled as a PQ From: Otto Sanchez o...@ipexpert.com To: Sergio Polizer spoli...@hotmail.com; basmj...@msn.com Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Mon, January 25, 2010 12:29:25 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS solutions in PG CCIE Voice v3. Vol. 2 Lab 2 6.3 Hi Bas, Sergio, I agree, although the internal dscp to cos map should be used to deduct the cos value and hence the queue and threshold values through the mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue settings, the SRND states (as Sergio noticed), that mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue settings will take precedence. I think the only way cos to queue map will take effect is that dscp to queue maps are set to default using the command Sergio references. In consequence, as SRND itself recommends configure both dscp and cos queue maps to keep consistency, I also agree that shaping Q2 to 50% is configured as srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 2 5 5 as these are absolute values (1/2=0.5*100=50%) and not relatives as when calculating shared ratios, BR, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Sergio Polizer spoli...@hotmail.com wrote: I agree. Third bullit should be srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 2 5 5 And If We use auto qos maybe We should map dscp-map queue as well. According QoS SRND (2-58), DSCP-to-Queue/Threshold maps override CoS-to-Queue/Threshold maps. Or no mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map. May Someone give a help on this? Sergio. From: basmj...@msn.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:16:27 +0100 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS solutions in PG CCIE Voice v3. Vol. 2 Lab 2 6.3 Today I worked on la 2 of Vol. 2. I am confused about the solution given in the PG for question 6.3 - Signaling traffic should be placed in the second queue, PG mentiones only cos-map. Shouldn't this be done for the dsp-map as well? - Third bullit: adjust SRR so that Q2 shapes to 50% of the interface bandwith. PG answer: ... shape 10 50 20 20 I am confused because the Enterprise QoS SRND states that shape mode overrides shared mode and shape mode uses an inversed ratio weigth. So, if I follow this, I would choose 10 2 5 5 Below an example from the QoS design guide. CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% (and works in shared mode) CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 ! Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW Hope somebody can clarify this. Thanks in advance. kind regards, Bas Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they e-mail you. Quer fazer um álbum íncrivel? Conheça o Windows Live Fotos clicando aqui. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Regards, Otto Sanchez CCIE #25592 (Voice) Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME integration with CUPS
Hi, Presence and ucme integration is not currently supported, what you can do right now is obtaining the blf status from a ucme system connected to a ucm system via sip trunk and vice versa, Please refer to ucme configuration guide for details, BR, On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Vccie Vccie voiceccie2...@gmail.comwrote: I am looking for some kind of documentation if this is even feasible? I have looked around but have not seen anything saying about it not being supported, but also haven't found any documentation on if or how to do the integration. Any help would be appropriate. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Regards, Otto Sanchez CCIE #25592 (Voice) Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call control in cups
I would add to focus my studies for presence configuration (and for all applications in general), on being specific on what is necessary to complete a specific task, for example, if you were to configure desk phone mode only, no sip trunk, inbound acls, line end user association, cupc endpoint cucm configuration, etc are needed. In that way you can save some time in your lab exam, On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:09 AM, kill mill jha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi group, wanted to get everybodys thought on this. if the exam asks call control of phone using cups what r the things to be configured? i m thinking voicemail , deskphone no soft mode and be able to change presence status is there anything else i m missing ? thnx in advance ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Regards, Otto Sanchez CCIE #25592 (Voice) Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH from Flash
Hi, The only format supported by the moh file is g.711, you should also take care of the multicast ip address numbering to make it match to a g.711 moh streaming not g.729, BR, ,2010/1/22 Roger Källberg roger.kallb...@cygate.se As far as I know you need to have the file(s) in the correct format in flash, ie G729 if you want to use that for your MOH or G711U if that's what you want. Vik please correct me if I'm wrong. Brgds, *Roger Källberg* Consultant Cygate AB -- *Från:* vccie2010 [vccie2...@gmail.com] *Skickat:* den 22 januari 2010 04:18 *Till:* Vik Malhi *Kopia:* OSL Group *Ämne:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH from Flash Also Vik, is it must to have MOH flash file in G729 format if I need to have G729 MOH from flash ??? I am confused here...Could you please help me here. On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:41 PM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com wrote: I was trying to test MOH from flash on BR1. G711 MOH works fine butI am having problem when trying config and test G729. You said There should be no reason why you can’t play a g729 file from the flash if you have a music file in that format on the flash ..so does it mean I need to have MOH file shd be in G729 format so that the MOH from flash is G729 MOH, right ? On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: I’m not fully understanding the scenario. When you press hold from a PSTN phone then you are not testing your MOH settings. Can you confirm? When you are sourcing from the BR1 flash I would guess you would ALWAYS want it to be g711 since it is now local to the BR1 site. That’s one of the main reasons for doing this- we can play g711 music without any bandwidth being tied up. There should be no reason why you can’t play a g729 file from the flash if you have a music file in that format on the flash and you use the multicast moh 239.1.1.3 port 16384 route favoicesubinterface IP Add lo0 IP Addr command and increment on ip address on the UCM, use a single server (the one which has the base multicast ip of 239.1.1.1) and audio source 1. -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: *vma...@ipexpert.com *Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat * http://www.ipexpert.com/chat* IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (RS, Voice Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities * http://www.ipexpert.com/communities* and our public website at www.ipexpert.com *http://www.ipexpert.com* . -- *From: *vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com *Date: *Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:22:50 -0800 *To: *OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH from Flash Vik, so you mean whether we want G729 MOH or G711MOH to be played on BR1 from flash we should ALWAYS place MOH server in G711only. I did that and with that G711 MOH works perfectly fine when I put either HQ phone or PSTN phone on hold. But I am having problem work G729 MOH heard on BR1 phone when I place it on hold from HQ phone ( there is dead silence) while G729 MOH from works fine when I place BR1 phone on hold from PSTN ( I hear G729 Music on BR1 phone) . A this time on BR1 GW I do have multicast moh 239.1.1.3 port 16384 route favoicesubinterface IP Add lo0 IP Addr Am I missing something here please ? Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:59 PM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com wrote: correction please... But when I change the DP on MOH server as HQ-DP I get G729 MOH only when PSTN caller is put on hold but dead silence again when placing HQ phone on hold. Is it normal behaviour or am I missing somehting here please HQ-DP has region which is g711 internaly and g729 to br1 and br2 regions... On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:48 PM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com wrote: When I set the MOH server in G711only ( which has region with G711only to all other regions) and MOH Aduio source set to MC and MOH server set to 239.1.1.1 port 16384 with max hops 1 call-manager-fallback ip source-addr favoicesubinterface IP Addr max-eph 1 max-dn 1 multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route favoicesubinterface IP Add lo0 IP Addr ccm-manager music-oh-hold.au With above config G711 MOH from flash works fine, but when I try to set the G729 MOH by changingmulticast moh 239.1.1.3 port 16384 route favoicesubinterface IP Add lo0 IP Addr get silence MOH when I call from HQ internally or from PSTN . But when I change the DP on MOH server I get G729 MOH only when PSTN caller is put on hold but dead silence again when placing HQ phone on hold. Is it normal behaviour or am I missing somehting here please ? Thanks for your help. -AK
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS solutions in PG CCIE Voice v3. Vol. 2 Lab 2 6.3
Hi Otto, Sergio, Thanks for the explanation and confirmation. Regards, Bas Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:59:25 -0430 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS solutions in PG CCIE Voice v3. Vol. 2 Lab 2 6.3 From: o...@ipexpert.com To: spoli...@hotmail.com; basmj...@msn.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi Bas, Sergio, I agree, although the internal dscp to cos map should be used to deduct the cos value and hence the queue and threshold values through the mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue settings, the SRND states (as Sergio noticed), that mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue settings will take precedence. I think the only way cos to queue map will take effect is that dscp to queue maps are set to default using the command Sergio references. In consequence, as SRND itself recommends configure both dscp and cos queue maps to keep consistency, I also agree that shaping Q2 to 50% is configured as srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 2 5 5 as these are absolute values (1/2=0.5*100=50%) and not relatives as when calculating shared ratios, BR, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Sergio Polizer spoli...@hotmail.com wrote: I agree. Third bullit should be srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 2 5 5 And If We use auto qos maybe We should map dscp-map queue as well. According QoS SRND (2-58), DSCP-to-Queue/Threshold maps override CoS-to-Queue/Threshold maps. Or no mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map. May Someone give a help on this? Sergio. From: basmj...@msn.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:16:27 +0100 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS solutions in PG CCIE Voice v3. Vol. 2 Lab 2 6.3 Today I worked on la 2 of Vol. 2. I am confused about the solution given in the PG for question 6.3 - Signaling traffic should be placed in the second queue, PG mentiones only cos-map. Shouldn't this be done for the dsp-map as well? - Third bullit: adjust SRR so that Q2 shapes to 50% of the interface bandwith. PG answer: ... shape 10 50 20 20 I am confused because the Enterprise QoS SRND states that shape mode overrides shared mode and shape mode uses an inversed ratio weigth. So, if I follow this, I would choose 10 2 5 5 Below an example from the QoS design guide. CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% (and works in shared mode) CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 ! Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW Hope somebody can clarify this. Thanks in advance. kind regards, Bas Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they e-mail you. Quer fazer um álbum íncrivel? Conheça o Windows Live Fotos clicando aqui. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Regards, Otto Sanchez CCIE #25592 (Voice) Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com _ Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you’re up to on Facebook. http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_2:092009___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VOL 2 LAB3 Question 5.3 - bandwidth percent or bandwidth remaining percent
Hi Sergio, Positive, that would be the correct configuration for the scenario you mentioned, and it would be 5% of 306.8kbps [364.8kbps (mincir) - 58kbps (llq priority bw)], BR, On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Sergio Polizer spoli...@hotmail.comwrote: Hi, VOL 2 LAB3 Question 5.3 asks for Use 5 percent of the unused bw for signaling traffic. We can not use bandwidth percent or bandwidth remaining percent to achieve this task. PQ states to use bandwidth percent 5. Now let's suppose that It was permitted. Shouldn't the answer be bandwidth remaining percent 5 Thanks for some clarification, Sergio. -- O Pedro tem 25 Gb grátis de armazenamento na web. Quer também? Clique aqui.http://www.eutenhomaisnowindowslive.com.br/?utm_source=MSN_Hotmailutm_medium=Taglineutm_campaign=InfuseSocial ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Regards, Otto Sanchez CCIE #25592 (Voice) Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS solutions in PG CCIE Voice v3. Vol. 2 Lab 2 6.3
Hi, What they mean is that weight1 for the srr-queue bandwidth shape or the srr-queue bandwidth share commands are ignored in the bandwidth or ratio calculations, HTH, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Shaaf Shah shaaf_shah2...@yahoo.comwrote: I had a similar question relating to the qos. Below is an example from SRND where the first queue is limited to 1/3 of the available bandwidth and then the Q1 is enabled as priority queue with teh priority-queue out command. But IOS reference guide for 3560 says that if we enable priority-queue out command then it will override the srr-queue bandwidth share and srr-queue bandwidth shape commands. Can some one help on this one? Shaaf CAT2970(config)#interface range GigabitEthernet0/1 - 28 CAT2970(config-if-range)# queue-set 1 ! Assigns interface to Queue-Set 1 (default) CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 ! Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW CAT2970(config-if-range)# priority-queue out ! Q1 is enabled as a PQ -- *From:* Otto Sanchez o...@ipexpert.com *To:* Sergio Polizer spoli...@hotmail.com; basmj...@msn.com *Cc:* OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Mon, January 25, 2010 12:29:25 PM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS solutions in PG CCIE Voice v3. Vol. 2 Lab 2 6.3 Hi Bas, Sergio, I agree, although the internal dscp to cos map should be used to deduct the cos value and hence the queue and threshold values through the mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue settings, the SRND states (as Sergio noticed), that mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue settings will take precedence. I think the only way cos to queue map will take effect is that dscp to queue maps are set to default using the command Sergio references. In consequence, as SRND itself recommends configure both dscp and cos queue maps to keep consistency, I also agree that shaping Q2 to 50% is configured as srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 *2* 5 5 as these are absolute values (1/2=0.5*100=50%) and not relatives as when calculating shared ratios, BR, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Sergio Polizer spoli...@hotmail.comwrote: I agree. Third bullit should be srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 2 5 5 And If We use auto qos maybe We should map dscp-map queue as well. According QoS SRND (2-58), DSCP-to-Queue/Threshold maps override CoS-to-Queue/Threshold maps. Or no mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map. May Someone give a help on this? Sergio. -- From: basmj...@msn.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:16:27 +0100 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS solutions in PG CCIE Voice v3. Vol. 2 Lab 2 6.3 Today I worked on la 2 of Vol. 2. I am confused about the solution given in the PG for question 6.3 - Signaling traffic should be placed in the second queue, PG mentiones only cos-map. Shouldn't this be done for the dsp-map as well? - Third bullit: adjust SRR so that Q2 shapes to 50% of the interface bandwith. PG answer: ... shape 10 50 20 20 I am confused because the Enterprise QoS SRND states that shape mode overrides shared mode and shape mode uses an inversed ratio weigth. So, if I follow this, I would choose 10 2 5 5 Below an example from the QoS design guide. CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% (and works in shared mode) CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 ! Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW Hope somebody can clarify this. Thanks in advance. kind regards, Bas -- Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they e-mail you.http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_3:092010 -- Quer fazer um álbum íncrivel? Conheça o Windows Live Fotos clicando aqui.http://www.eutenhomaisnowindowslive.com.br/?utm_source=MSN_Hotmailutm_medium=Taglineutm_campaign=InfuseSocial ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Regards, Otto Sanchez CCIE #25592 (Voice) Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -- Regards, Otto Sanchez CCIE #25592 (Voice) Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPS Registration issue
Hi, No, it's not, check your presence configuration for both cups and cucm, there are many setting to check. I would start checking cups and cupc health, BR, On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 4:41 PM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.comwrote: CUPS registration status shows unknown but client can make and receive calls and voicemail notification, is this normal if you are running in desktop mode? On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:00 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.comwrote: Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest... Today's Topics: 1. Proper Way to Build Your Dial Plan (David Wagner) 2. Calling Number Transformation Behavior (David Wagner) 3. submissions ccie voice (NYI NYI) 4. IPPM service for CUPC (kavi ten) 5. IPExpert's Volume 1 Video Walkthroughs (Berry, Matthew J.) -- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:33:55 -0600 From: David Wagner unifiedd...@gmail.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proper Way to Build Your Dial Plan To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Message-ID: c1fe40ef1001231933j279c895bp67bba818fde0a...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hello List, What is the proper way to build a call route in cucm 7. As you all know there is many ways to accomplish this task. I fully understand SLRGs and they work great for basic calling but once you throw some redundancy and TEHO into the mix things get funky really quick. I think I have found the best way to use them is with a translation pattern to match the pattern and set the external phone number mask if needed along with plan and type. then prefix a + and send it along to a route pattern of \+.! which will route it out the SLRG, And this works. OK now for TEHO say you have a need to route All 212 calls from a Chicago Phone out the NY gate way. Translation + Route Pattern to get the number to a new Route list with 2 route groups 1st CHI-RG 2nd NY-RG. Is this ok or would you want to use 1sr NY 2nd SLRG. Both will work but with the slrg you will need to use CALLING / Called Transformations to get the numbering right. TIA Dave -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100123/ab8dd56e/attachment-0001.htm -- Message: 2 Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:42:00 -0600 From: David Wagner unifiedd...@gmail.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Number Transformation Behavior To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Message-ID: c1fe40ef1001231942t785c0cd2of646a60a57576...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I am trying to transform a DN on my egress gateway (MGCP PRI) I have used DP transform CSS unchecked and a hard coded CSS of HQ_Xform which has access to H!_Xform_PT for both calling and called transformation CSS. I have a calling number transformation mask of 1XXX which is set to use external phone number mask and then mask it done to 7 digits using XXX. It does not work unless i hard code the transformation pattern to 1001 (Or another DN) then it works fine. I have rebooted the cluster and deleted and re-added the pattern a few times no go unless hard coded exact match. Anyone else see this? TIA Dave -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100123/6a28e09d/attachment-0001.htm -- Message: 3 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:31:51 +0800 From: NYI NYI nyinyi...@gmail.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] submissions ccie voice To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Message-ID: 54b31c251001232031x7563ac1bk723989852ab3c...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100124/0954c0bb/attachment-0001.htm -- Message: 4 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:37:07 +0400 From: kavi ten kaucc...@gmail.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPM service for CUPC To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Message-ID: 2115142c1001232237k76ba6b2etf6084f1c24653...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I have run through a problem , After configuring the IPPM service in CUCM subscribing this service on the Phone as per the Vol 2 Lab
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP load for 7941/61 and CME
Can someone please tell me what load to use for SIP on the CME for the Cisco 7941/61 phone model? I see 3 types of files to download, the .zip the .cop and the .cop.sgn file on Cisco's site, but they all referance CallManager only. Bill ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH from Flash
Thanks Otto for yoru kind reponse, so let me put the question otherway , what should I do on the UCM and SiteB router if I was to use MOH from flash and it shd be G729. Is this scenario possible please as we say on SiteB router the IP address will be 239.1.1.3 and I think in this case all the configs on UCM remain same, right pls? 2010/1/25 Otto Sanchez o...@ipexpert.com Hi, The only format supported by the moh file is g.711, you should also take care of the multicast ip address numbering to make it match to a g.711 moh streaming not g.729, BR, ,2010/1/22 Roger Källberg roger.kallb...@cygate.se As far as I know you need to have the file(s) in the correct format in flash, ie G729 if you want to use that for your MOH or G711U if that's what you want. Vik please correct me if I'm wrong. Brgds, *Roger Källberg* Consultant Cygate AB -- *Från:* vccie2010 [vccie2...@gmail.com] *Skickat:* den 22 januari 2010 04:18 *Till:* Vik Malhi *Kopia:* OSL Group *Ämne:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH from Flash Also Vik, is it must to have MOH flash file in G729 format if I need to have G729 MOH from flash ??? I am confused here...Could you please help me here. On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:41 PM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com wrote: I was trying to test MOH from flash on BR1. G711 MOH works fine butI am having problem when trying config and test G729. You said There should be no reason why you can’t play a g729 file from the flash if you have a music file in that format on the flash ..so does it mean I need to have MOH file shd be in G729 format so that the MOH from flash is G729 MOH, right ? On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: I’m not fully understanding the scenario. When you press hold from a PSTN phone then you are not testing your MOH settings. Can you confirm? When you are sourcing from the BR1 flash I would guess you would ALWAYS want it to be g711 since it is now local to the BR1 site. That’s one of the main reasons for doing this- we can play g711 music without any bandwidth being tied up. There should be no reason why you can’t play a g729 file from the flash if you have a music file in that format on the flash and you use the multicast moh 239.1.1.3 port 16384 route favoicesubinterface IP Add lo0 IP Addr command and increment on ip address on the UCM, use a single server (the one which has the base multicast ip of 239.1.1.1) and audio source 1. -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: *vma...@ipexpert.com *Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat * http://www.ipexpert.com/chat* IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (RS, Voice Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities * http://www.ipexpert.com/communities* and our public website at www.ipexpert.com *http://www.ipexpert.com* . -- *From: *vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com *Date: *Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:22:50 -0800 *To: *OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH from Flash Vik, so you mean whether we want G729 MOH or G711MOH to be played on BR1 from flash we should ALWAYS place MOH server in G711only. I did that and with that G711 MOH works perfectly fine when I put either HQ phone or PSTN phone on hold. But I am having problem work G729 MOH heard on BR1 phone when I place it on hold from HQ phone ( there is dead silence) while G729 MOH from works fine when I place BR1 phone on hold from PSTN ( I hear G729 Music on BR1 phone) . A this time on BR1 GW I do have multicast moh 239.1.1.3 port 16384 route favoicesubinterface IP Add lo0 IP Addr Am I missing something here please ? Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:59 PM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com wrote: correction please... But when I change the DP on MOH server as HQ-DP I get G729 MOH only when PSTN caller is put on hold but dead silence again when placing HQ phone on hold. Is it normal behaviour or am I missing somehting here please HQ-DP has region which is g711 internaly and g729 to br1 and br2 regions... On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:48 PM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com wrote: When I set the MOH server in G711only ( which has region with G711only to all other regions) and MOH Aduio source set to MC and MOH server set to 239.1.1.1 port 16384 with max hops 1 call-manager-fallback ip source-addr favoicesubinterface IP Addr max-eph 1 max-dn 1 multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route favoicesubinterface IP Add lo0 IP Addr ccm-manager music-oh-hold.au With above config G711 MOH from flash works fine, but when I try to set the G729 MOH by changingmulticast moh
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MULTICAST MOH over SIP TRUNK?
Am I correct in my testing that Multicast over SIP trunk to a PSTN connection doesn't work? (I hear dead air and my MOHMulticastResourceActive = 1 ) I have the following setup and I am unable to get PSTN MULTICAST MOH to work correctly, but Internal clients get MOH. I have tested with and H323 gateway and it works perfectly, so I know my multicast and MRGL's are setup correctly. I thought it might need a MTP but after testing it didn't fix the problem, so I am stumped. PHONE -- UCM-- SIPTRUNK -- HQ(PRI) -- PSTN--PHONE MULTICAST MOH is source from HQ PHONE = PHONE = OK PHONE (SIP-Trunk) - PSTN = NO PHONE (H323) - PSTN = OK Thanks for you help -Otto thanks for the CME -to- CUPS integration help. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
