Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display of globalized number on 7965

[Scott Newberry]

What you describe is the only possible solution. It's just a limitation of
the CME on the PSTN router.  No worries, as long as you see it at the bottom
of the screen.

On Sep 15, 2010 4:05 PM, "Mark Holloway"  wrote:

If I send a call from the HQ through the PSTN to BR2 and the calling number
from HQ is in E.164 format, the BR2 phone's main display (ie. large fonts)
doesn't show the + in front of 1XX but on the bottom part of the
7965's screen it does show +1XX in smaller fonts.  Is this
considered acceptable if we are required to send E.164 as the calling
number?  I would think so.  The ISDN debug on BR2 does show the calling
number as +1XX.




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM - both ways not working

[Jeff Garvas]

I have not played with VPIM to Unity Connection (just recently dealt with it
in Exchange for the first time) but I can tell you what is going on here:

< MAIL FROM:<2...@unity>|
 554 5.1.8 Bad senders system address|

^ This is a somewhat basic SMTP failure.  The sender address is being
rejected because it doesn't like the right half of the @ symbol.  So either
you need to change what you're sending as (the domain portion) or you need
to allow that domain portion at the receiving end.  Without working with
VPIM and UC at all I can't exactly tell you where to do any of this, but
whats happening here is the sender is being rejected obviously.

Until you resolve that and get a messed queued response you're not
completing the SMTP portion of VPIM.   To answer question number 3, this
needs to be a RFC compliant email domain, so yes, something like
foo.comshould be your sending domain, as well as your recipient
domain.  Each end
needs to be a different domain or subdomain.   Probably best to read the
SRND on this for a definitive answer.

-jeff


On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:31 PM, vcciev  wrote:

> Anyone please shed some light on this.
>
> Thanks.
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: SRST to VM - redirecting number lost

[Randall Saborio]

vcciev, perhaps you could also share your findings during your labs and then
maybe someone would like to shed a light on you.

-- Forwarded message --
From: Amit Batra 
Date: Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 3:14 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST to VM - redirecting number lost
To: vcciev 
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 


Hi

   Buddy ,, could you please share what helped you to fixed the issue???

Regards
Amit

Sent from my iPhone

On 19/09/2010, at 7:41 PM, vcciev  wrote:

OK, resolved
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com



-- 
Randall "da ill" Saborio
CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to use CDR REPORTING to overcome IP blue limitations for Normalization

[Randall Saborio]

Pithog,

Is it error 10012 or 10021 like you stated on the previous thread you
created.

>From the troubleshooting document you came up with your research (you mean I
provided you), on what step of the troubleshooting do you get stuck?

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Pithog Oil  wrote:

>  Amy thanks for being a blessing to US.
>
> This challenge has slowed my preparation down a great deal. This is the
> third time i am trying to get the solution to this challenge.
>
> Experts i have this challenge
>
> I have been trying  to use IP blue for my globalization and localization
> practice, in a way that i can check the CDR reporting and analysis from the
> cisco unified Servicability, as was demonstrated by *Vik* in *lab 7 vol 2
> ,* i know ip blue has a limitation but *VIk *demonstrated how to overcome
> this limitation by verifying your globalization and localization is properly
> done with CDR analysis.
>
> I have tried to use my CDR reporting but it keeps giving me *ERROR 10012,*
> *
> *
> while doing some research i came across this document but i am still unable
> to resolve this issue, Pls i will appreciate it to have an expert light me
> up on this.
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products_tech_note09186a0080933fcf.shtml
>
> Pithog oil
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>


-- 
Randall "da ill" Saborio
CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM - both ways not working

[vcciev]

Anyone please shed some light on this.

Thanks.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to use CDR REPORTING to overcome IP blue limitations for Normalization

[Pithog Oil]

Amy thanks for being a blessing to US.
This challenge has slowed my preparation down a great deal. This is the third 
time i am trying to get the solution to this challenge.
Experts i have this challenge
I have been trying  to use IP blue for my globalization and localization 
practice, in a way that i can check the CDR reporting and analysis from the 
cisco unified Servicability, as was demonstrated by Vik in lab 7 vol 2 , i know 
ip blue has a limitation but VIk demonstrated how to overcome this limitation 
by verifying your globalization and localization is properly done with CDR 
analysis.
I have tried to use my CDR reporting but it keeps giving me ERROR
 10012,
while doing some research i came across this document but i am still unable to 
resolve this issue, Pls i will appreciate it to have an expert light me up on 
this.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products_tech_note09186a0080933fcf.shtml
Pithog oil


  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] After Hour block patterns

[Amy Ryan]

This would be the one to best bit the required solution.


after-hours day Sun 12:00 06:59
after-hours day Mon 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Tue 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Wed 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Thu 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Fri 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Sat 13:00 12:00



---
Amy Ryan ­ CCIE #24677 (Voice)
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: ar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat

eFax: +1.810.454.0130

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (R&S, Voice, Wireless, Security & Service Provider) certification(s)
with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities   and our
public website at www.ipexpert.com 




From: Pithog Oil 
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] After Hour block patterns

Please i will like an expert to help me out with this solution

The Bls video conlict with work books,

REQUIREMENT is to block international calls for this hours

Monday - Friday, 7pm-7am
All weekend, except Sat 7am-1pm

Please which of the solutions below best fits the required solution.

after-hours day Sun 12:00 07:00
after-hours day Mon 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Tue 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Wed 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Thu 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Fri 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Sat 13:00 12:00


after-hours day Sun 12:00 06:59
after-hours day Mon 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Tue 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Wed 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Thu 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Fri 19:00 06:59
after-hours day Sat 13:00 12:00




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Heads-up: Brussels Lab Location

[Marko Milivojevic]

I heard from couple of students and Cisco employees of renovations in
the building where the lab is. Apparently, noise levels during the
exam are a bit higher than usual and long (up to one hour) power
outages are not uncommon these days.

Please, be advised of this if you are planning exam in Brussels. Bring
some earplugs for noise and arm yourself with patience in a case of
power outage.

Good luck everyone!

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] After hour block pattern

[Pithog Oil]

This is the concept that was used in arriving at the timing for mondays through 
friday.
Allowing international calls between 7am and 7pm only during week days,
means Blocking from 19:00hrs to 06:59hrs  i.e if blocking lasts till 06:59 the 
next minute will be 7:00 , so blocking stops at 06:59 and allowing of calls 
starts at 07:00.
Now this is clear, but i really do not understand the sunday drift of  having 
the blocking time stop at 07:00 , monday morning should not be different from 
any other morning in the week.
The BLS videos has a different view from the printed workbooks.
I would appreciate it if an expert could make this clearer to
 me.





  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Phones and Codec

[Stutz, Bernhard]

Hi,
 
On Lab9 Question 3.7 Solution is stated that there is a need for a transcoder 
in order to get calls between a sip phone and sccp phone working because the 
sip phone can only handle G.711.
 
I got here a 7975 phone which can handle G.729 aswell when i configure it 
following way:
 
 
voice class codec 1
 codec preference 1 g711ulaw bytes 160
 codec preference 2 g729r8 bytes 20

voice register pool  2
 id mac 0026.99ED.8B34
 type 7975
 number 1 dn 2
 dtmf-relay rtp-nte
 voice-class codec 1
 username 1002 password cisco
 description 617-863-1002
 no vad

When making a call between sip phone and sccp phone i see there G.729 been used 
by hitting "?" twice on the phones.
 
Can the x-lite client only handle G.711 ? What's about the 7965 phones? can 
they handle G.729 as a sip phone aswell?
 
kindly regards,
Bernhard
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] After Hour block patterns

[David Lee]

This is what I think it should be:

REQUIREMENT is to block international calls for this hours
Monday - Friday, 7pm-7am <--- My interpretation is to allow 7am to 7pm
inclusive
Sat 7am-1pm <--- My interpretation is to allow 7am to 1pm inclusive
Sunday all day <--- block all day

Sunday 12:00 to 06:59 <-- Blocking Sunday noon 12pm to Monday 06:59 to allow
calling at 07:00am

(Allow 7am to 7pm)
Monday 19:01 to 06:59 <-- Blocking from 19:01 to next day 06:59

(Allow 7am to 7pm)
Tuesday 19:01 to 06:59 <-- Blocking from 19:01 to next day 06:59

etc

(Allow 7am to 7pm)
Friday 1901 to 06:59  <-- Blocking from 19:01 to Sat 06:59

(Allow 7am to 1300 1pm)
Sat 13:01 to 12:00 <-- Blocking from Sat 1300 hours to Sunday noon 12pm.
 I'm thinking that you can enter any ending time here as long as you pick it
up on the Sunday block time.




On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:00 PM, wrote:

> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Hotels in Columbus (Amp)
>   2. Why set Called party type? (Peterson Gomes)
>   3. Re: Why set Called party type? (Stutz, Bernhard)
>   4. After Hour block patterns (Pithog Oil)
>   5. Re: phone is not taking IP from DHCP server (Peterson Gomes)
>   6. Re: phone is not taking IP from DHCP server (Daniel Berlinski)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:35:54 -0400
> From: Amp 
> To: Tyson Scott 
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, mthompson...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hotels in Columbus
> Message-ID: <20100919143554.y38605haw4ws4...@www.cciequest.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;   charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes";
>format="flowed"
>
> Hey Tyson,
> Will that discount code be in effect before the boot camp starts next week?
>
> Amp
> Quoting Tyson Scott :
>
> > I recommend the Fairfield Inn and suites on worthington rd.  We are in
> > the process of negotiations with them.  Will have a discount code soon
> > with them.  You cannot walk across the overpass but extended stay does
> > offer shuttle service.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tyson Scott
> > CCIE # 13513 (R&S, Security, SP)
> > Managing Partner/Technical Instructor - IPexpert Inc.
> > tsc...@ipexpert.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > - Reply message -
> > From: "Mike Thompson" 
> > Date: Sun, Sep 19, 2010 11:38 am
> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hotels in Columbus
> > To: "Amp" 
> > Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
> >
> >
> > And be careful, due to the number of hotels I'm a small area, lots of
> > car break ins
> >
> > Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
> >
> > On Sep 19, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Amp  wrote:
> >
> >> Hey Gang,
> >> Can anyone tell me if the Extended Stay Deluxe - Polaris is in
> >> walking distance to the IPexpert training facility?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Amp
> >>
> >> ___
> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> >> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> > please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:18:04 -0300
> From: Peterson Gomes 
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why set Called party type?
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hello guys
>
> Somebody known why and what are advantages with called party type?
> Here in Brazil in ALL my solutions I never set the called party type ALL
> calls works fine. This is a particular configuration in North American or
> Europe?
>
> Thanks
>
> Peterson
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> 
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:56:53 +0200
> From: "Stutz, Bernhard" 
> To: "Peterson Gomes" ,
>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why set Called party type?
> Message-ID:
><8eb8e7054d698544b600adf5ef068fdb04db6...@ffmpdcexch1.pandacom.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi Peterson,
>
>
>
> Some providers in Europe requesting this for billing purposes.
>
> Also it doesn't matter if it used in the field or not. If this
> requirement comes in the lab you have to know how to deal with it ;-)
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bernhard
>
>
>
> Von: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call flow question

[Mav]

Hello,



I have a scenario where incoming call needs to ring to both manager and
secretary phones at the same time, in the event that nobody answer than its
going to hunt to a group of 2 secretary. I was able to accomplish this
building 2 line group . my challenge is in the event that the first
Secretary logs off the hunt , how can I get the next member to take her
place?I tried using a shared line eliminating the second LG,manager doesn't
need to log off , but that didn't work.



I'm using CUCM version 7.1.5



thank you in advance.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] phone is not taking IP from DHCP server

[Daniel Berlinski]

This is a deep question.

Could you tell is what have you done already to troubleshoot this issue?
Work your way up from Layer 1 and you will find the issue.
There is a good document on cisco.com search for phone registration problems
- It is a CUCM 3.x document but very useful.  Also, there is the chapter 3
of the troubleshooting book there is great for this.



On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Peterson Gomes wrote:

> Hello
>
> Maybe hub just can see the access vlan and not voice access vlan (auxiliary
> vlan)
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] phone is not taking IP from DHCP server

[Peterson Gomes]

Hello

Maybe hub just can see the access vlan and not voice access vlan (auxiliary
vlan)
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] After Hour block patterns

[Pithog Oil]

Please i will like an expert to help me out with this solution
The Bls video conlict with work books, 
REQUIREMENT is to block international calls for this hours
Monday - Friday, 7pm-7amAll weekend, except Sat 7am-1pm
Please which of the solutions below best fits the required solution.
after-hours day Sun 12:00 07:00after-hours day Mon 19:00 06:59after-hours day 
Tue 19:00 06:59after-hours day Wed 19:00 06:59after-hours day Thu 19:00 
06:59after-hours day Fri 19:00 06:59after-hours day Sat 13:00 12:00

after-hours day Sun 12:00 06:59after-hours day Mon 19:00 06:59after-hours day 
Tue 19:00 06:59after-hours day Wed 19:00 06:59after-hours day Thu 19:00 
06:59after-hours day Fri 19:00 06:59after-hours day Sat 13:00 12:00



  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why set Called party type?

[Stutz, Bernhard]

Hi Peterson,

 

Some providers in Europe requesting this for billing purposes. 

Also it doesn't matter if it used in the field or not. If this
requirement comes in the lab you have to know how to deal with it ;-)

 

Cheers,

Bernhard

 

Von: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] Im Auftrag von Peterson
Gomes
Gesendet: Sonntag, 19. September 2010 23:18
An: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Betreff: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why set Called party type?

 

Hello guys

Somebody known why and what are advantages with called party type?
Here in Brazil in ALL my solutions I never set the called party type ALL
calls works fine. This is a particular configuration in North American
or Europe?

Thanks

Peterson

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com