Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME: assign blf-speed-dial to a specific button?

2011-03-28 Thread Rogers Ochieng
I think you'll have to configure 3 place holder ephone-dn's with no number
say
ephone-dn 5 dual-line
ephone-dn 6 dual-line
ephone-dn 7 dual-line

then

button 2:5 3:6 4:7

this will force the blf speed dial to be pushed to button 5

On 28 March 2011 07:31, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm using CME 7.1 and 7965 phone.

 Let say, I want to configure a blf-speed-dial on the 5th button on the
 phone.  How should I configure that?  I know the blf-speed-dial command.
 But I couldn't figure out how to assign it to a specific button.

 Thanks!
 Michael

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA partial match

2011-03-28 Thread Shrini

It is ..yes confusing

Partial is number of digits selected from left ( decide the number based 
on your deb isdn q931 ) not displayed on phone screen. Complete match 
is the number in the MVA configuration.


If you select complete match debug isdn q931 should show exact number.

Look for page help for more info.

Thanks
Shrini

On 3/27/2011 10:20 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote:

hi all,
can someone explain bit on MVA  logic or flow ?
I config MVA  Complete match   service parameter in UCM ,  but still 
I called from any number , it prompt for pin (as if it match)

Thanks in advyou



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA using sip trunk

2011-03-28 Thread Stanislav Braichuk
Just uncheck Redirection Header Delivery at SIP trunk configuration

27.03.2011 23:08 пользователь Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.com написал:
 no just play around w sip trunk

 --- On Sun, 3/27/11, mihal caro mihalc...@gmail.com wrote:


 From: mihal caro mihalc...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA using sip trunk
 To: Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.com
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Received: Sunday, March 27, 2011, 6:14 PM


 hi there

 I had the same problem

 SIp trunk MVA is support on CUCM 7.13 . If is for the CCIE lab you need to
configure it as H323.


 regards.


 On 27 March 2011 07:24, Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.com wrote:






 hi all,

 I tried to config MVA in  HQ site,

 Scenario
 -
  I dial in  from PSTN to  5999 (MVA #)

 it gave me prompt for pin and press 1 to dial  any outside number (911)

 1. If I use SIP trunk It will gave me error saying (below is the complete
debug ccsip message

  Sent:
 SIP/2.0 400 Bad Request - 'Malformed/Missing Contact field' 

 2. However if I use, H323 GW , call out  by MVA  to outside (ie :911 )
work fine

 Question
 -
 - wondering any parameter in SIP\ trunk I need to check ?

 tks in adv



 Complete debug
 ===
 PSTN-WAN#
 Mar 27 06:07:26.026: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
 Sent:
 SIP/2.0 400 Bad Request - 'Malformed/Missing Contact field'
 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.210.10:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1861aabffa
 From: sip:??5001@10.10.210.10
;tag=ad370c0e-63ed-49fa-adb9-1bd65232089c-20651851
 To: sip:911@10.10.110.4;tag=1343344-12F6
 Call-ID: 7bcce880-d8e1d41e-10-ad20a0a@10.10.210.10
 CSeq: 101 INVITE
 Reason: Q.850;cause=100
 Content-Length: 0





 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com





___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voiceview error

2011-03-28 Thread George Goglidze
did you assign the phone to jtapi user?



On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.com wrote:

 hi all,

 When I press the Voiceview  Listen  , it said :Unknown Error ,report to
 System Administrator 

 all other Voiceview work fine, wondering what i miss here?

 tks


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB II, Lab 10, Calling Party Localization

2011-03-28 Thread adam compton
I was just trying to help.  Worked for me no problem

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:44 AM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Adam,

 I would really think that if I had that things that you mentioned not
 configured correctly, then even if I stopped Subscriber Call Manager
 service, it wouldn't have worked correctly once all registered to
 Publisher... config error but it does as I mentioned in my e-mails.

 Thanks,

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:51 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm actually doing that lab right now :)

 Make sure that use device pool calling transformation css is not checked
 and assign the css to the phone.  Reboot the phone.  Might require a no mgcp
 and mgcp on the gateways.


 On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:50 AM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi Roger,

 I checked the replication on a cli on both, PUB/SUB:
  admin:show perf query class Number of Replicates Created and State of
 Replication
 ==query class :

  - Perf class (Number of Replicates Created and State of Replication) has
 instances and values:
 ReplicateCount  - Number of Replicates Created   = 412
 ReplicateCount  - Replicate_State= 2


 I know the config is correct, because if I stop Call manager service on
 the Sub, or remove it from the Call Manager group, everything works fine...
  So it has to be good.

 I don't want to loose much time with this, as I'm with proctorlabs online
 rack rental, so I refer to finish the lab.
 at the end if I finish it much earlier, then I might do it, and reset the
 replication between sub/pub.

 Thanks for anwering Roger!

 Cheers,

 On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Roger Carpio roger.car...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hello George,

 Very rarely I've seen replication status 2 and weird behaviors happen.
 Have you checked replication anywhere else? CLI / Unified Reporting?

 If you've done this many times and you're sure the configuration has
 been done correctly; drop this replication and reset it cluster wide. I
 hope it helps.

 Regards,
 Roger Carpio.

   On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:28 AM, George Goglidze 
 gogli...@gmail.comwrote:

  Hi all,

 I was wondering if anyone has seen this before.

 There is a requirement to show in Missed/Received directory numbers in
 E164 format, but in alerting/connected state it should be localized for
 user.
 Subscriber to 7digit, national to 10digit, international to 011

 I have configured correct prefixes on the incoming gateways, so
 Missed/Received directory is fine! It shows correct values with the +sign
 E164 format.

 And I have configured pt-norm-hq-ani, pt-norm-br1-ani, pt-norm-br2-ani,
 which are in their corresponding css-norm-hq-ani, css-norm-br1-ani,
 css-norm-br2-ani
 and I've applied them to the corresponding Device Pools, in Calling
 Party Transformation CSS.

 But when the call comes in, I still get in alerting/connected state
 E164 format.

 All my devices phones and gateways are registered to Sub first, and in
 failed to Publisher.

 If I change this and I register all the devices to the Publisher,
 instead of a subscriber, changing it in Callmanager group configuration,
 then it all works as expected.
 Therefore I thought maybe Sub is not replicating correctly, but I've
 checked and the replication Status is 2! which means it's replicating 
 fine.
 I have even restarted the Subscriber but it didn't fix the issue.

 I am out of ideas, and I've done it many times in prior Labs, and it
 has always worked fine!
 I've searched through CCM Service Parameters, and couldn't find
 anything that could affect this behaviour.

 If anyone has seen this, please let me know...

 Regards,

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com




 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multicast MoH to CUBE

2011-03-28 Thread Alex Goh
Anyone can enlighten me?

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Alex Goh ncsalex@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi All,

 When trying to practice some MoH lab today, I notice that whenever
 HQ/BR1 phone make a call
 to BR2 Phone via H323 gateway, which BR2 setup as CME
 (telephony-service), when HQ/BR1 phone press hold,
 the MoH will not work (BR2 phone hear silence). But when BR2 phone
 press Hold, HQ/BR1 phone can hear MoH.

 Same for when HQ/BR1 tried to send call out to PSTN via the H323
 gateway, the PSTN hear no MoH.
 BR2 Phone call PSTN the MoH is ok though.

 My HQ is set to send Unicast MoH, while BR1 is set to send Multicast
 MoH. MoH servers have different DP
 and Region to all site is g711.

 I did tried to turn the BR2 into a H323 gateway only (no CUBE) and
 configured the following commands:
 ccm-manager music-on-hold,
 moh music-on-hold.au
 multicast moh 239.1.1.5 port 16384

 Then MoH is working fine when HQ/BR1 put the call to PSTN on hold via
 the H323 gateway, also when
 HQ/BR1 calling BR2 Phone which on different DP/Region, MoH is working
 fine for both direction.

 Is this normal that Multicast MoH or Unicast MoH is not supporting
 CUBE in this case?
 also, why is BR2 CME phone calling HQ/BR1 phone yet MoH is working fine?

 Regards,
 Alex

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB II, Lab 10, Calling Party Localization

2011-03-28 Thread George Goglidze
Hi Adam,

Just a question, which vRack are you using? I was on rack 15, maybe that one
in particular has some problem?


On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:12 PM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:

 I was just trying to help.  Worked for me no problem


 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:44 AM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi Adam,

 I would really think that if I had that things that you mentioned not
 configured correctly, then even if I stopped Subscriber Call Manager
 service, it wouldn't have worked correctly once all registered to
 Publisher... config error but it does as I mentioned in my e-mails.

 Thanks,

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:51 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm actually doing that lab right now :)

 Make sure that use device pool calling transformation css is not
 checked and assign the css to the phone.  Reboot the phone.  Might require a
 no mgcp and mgcp on the gateways.


 On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:50 AM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi Roger,

 I checked the replication on a cli on both, PUB/SUB:
  admin:show perf query class Number of Replicates Created and State of
 Replication
 ==query class :

  - Perf class (Number of Replicates Created and State of Replication)
 has instances and values:
 ReplicateCount  - Number of Replicates Created   = 412
 ReplicateCount  - Replicate_State= 2


 I know the config is correct, because if I stop Call manager service on
 the Sub, or remove it from the Call Manager group, everything works fine...
  So it has to be good.

 I don't want to loose much time with this, as I'm with proctorlabs
 online rack rental, so I refer to finish the lab.
 at the end if I finish it much earlier, then I might do it, and reset
 the replication between sub/pub.

 Thanks for anwering Roger!

 Cheers,

 On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Roger Carpio 
 roger.car...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hello George,

 Very rarely I've seen replication status 2 and weird behaviors happen.
 Have you checked replication anywhere else? CLI / Unified Reporting?

 If you've done this many times and you're sure the configuration has
 been done correctly; drop this replication and reset it cluster wide. I
 hope it helps.

 Regards,
 Roger Carpio.

   On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:28 AM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com
  wrote:

  Hi all,

 I was wondering if anyone has seen this before.

 There is a requirement to show in Missed/Received directory numbers in
 E164 format, but in alerting/connected state it should be localized for
 user.
 Subscriber to 7digit, national to 10digit, international to 011

 I have configured correct prefixes on the incoming gateways, so
 Missed/Received directory is fine! It shows correct values with the +sign
 E164 format.

 And I have configured pt-norm-hq-ani, pt-norm-br1-ani,
 pt-norm-br2-ani, which are in their corresponding css-norm-hq-ani,
 css-norm-br1-ani, css-norm-br2-ani
 and I've applied them to the corresponding Device Pools, in Calling
 Party Transformation CSS.

 But when the call comes in, I still get in alerting/connected state
 E164 format.

 All my devices phones and gateways are registered to Sub first, and in
 failed to Publisher.

 If I change this and I register all the devices to the Publisher,
 instead of a subscriber, changing it in Callmanager group configuration,
 then it all works as expected.
 Therefore I thought maybe Sub is not replicating correctly, but I've
 checked and the replication Status is 2! which means it's replicating 
 fine.
 I have even restarted the Subscriber but it didn't fix the issue.

 I am out of ideas, and I've done it many times in prior Labs, and it
 has always worked fine!
 I've searched through CCM Service Parameters, and couldn't find
 anything that could affect this behaviour.

 If anyone has seen this, please let me know...

 Regards,

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com




 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com





___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multicast MoH to CUBE

2011-03-28 Thread Brian Mulgrew
Hi Alex - see this  excellent post from Shingei re Multicast outwith cucm
cluster

http://onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2011-March/073393.html

Your unicast issue sounds as if it may be codec / xcoder related.

hth
Brian
http://onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2011-March/073393.html

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Alex Goh ncsalex@gmail.com wrote:

 Anyone can enlighten me?

 On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Alex Goh ncsalex@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi All,
 
  When trying to practice some MoH lab today, I notice that whenever
  HQ/BR1 phone make a call
  to BR2 Phone via H323 gateway, which BR2 setup as CME
  (telephony-service), when HQ/BR1 phone press hold,
  the MoH will not work (BR2 phone hear silence). But when BR2 phone
  press Hold, HQ/BR1 phone can hear MoH.
 
  Same for when HQ/BR1 tried to send call out to PSTN via the H323
  gateway, the PSTN hear no MoH.
  BR2 Phone call PSTN the MoH is ok though.
 
  My HQ is set to send Unicast MoH, while BR1 is set to send Multicast
  MoH. MoH servers have different DP
  and Region to all site is g711.
 
  I did tried to turn the BR2 into a H323 gateway only (no CUBE) and
  configured the following commands:
  ccm-manager music-on-hold,
  moh music-on-hold.au
  multicast moh 239.1.1.5 port 16384
 
  Then MoH is working fine when HQ/BR1 put the call to PSTN on hold via
  the H323 gateway, also when
  HQ/BR1 calling BR2 Phone which on different DP/Region, MoH is working
  fine for both direction.
 
  Is this normal that Multicast MoH or Unicast MoH is not supporting
  CUBE in this case?
  also, why is BR2 CME phone calling HQ/BR1 phone yet MoH is working fine?
 
  Regards,
  Alex
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware conference is stuck in state TCP_CONN_ERROR

2011-03-28 Thread Rahul Kapor
Hi all ,

I am trying to register my hardware conference to cucm/cme   but it is stuck
in TCP_CONN_ERROR error state.

sh sccp
Conferencing Oper State: ACTIVE_IN_PROGRESS - Cause Code: TCP_CONN_ERROR
Active Call Manager: NONE
TCP Link Status: CONNECT_PENDING, Profile Identifier: 1
Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
...
...

reloaded the router but did not help!

Please suggest.

Thx,
Rahul
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cbarge in SRST nt working !

2011-03-28 Thread Rahul Kapor
Hi all ,

Cbarge in SRST not working

here is my config

ephone-dn-template  1
 call-forward busy 914082026002
 call-forward noan 914082026002 timeout 3
ephone-template  1
 softkeys idle  Redial Newcall Cfwdall
ephone-dn  10  octo-line
 number 
 conference ad-hoc
ephone  1
 privacy off
 device-security-mode none
ephone  2
 privacy off
 device-security-mode none

telephony-service
 sdspfarm units 1
 sdspfarm tag 1 HQ-CONF
 no privacy
 conference hardware
 srst mode auto-provision none
 srst ephone template 1
 srst dn template 1
 srst dn line-mode octo
 max-ephones 15
 max-dn 15
 ip source-address 14.160.116.40 port 2000
 system message you are in fallback
 voicemail 914082026002
 max-conferences 12 gain -6
 moh music-on-hold.au
 multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 1.1.1.1 14.160.116.40
 transfer-system full-consult
 create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Mar 27 2011 01:04:02

Phones gets registered to SRST and shared line is seen on phone display.
i created octo dn for conf and conf bridge is registered to SRST.

Please let me know if i am missing any thing.

thx,
Rahul
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cbarge in SRST nt working !

2011-03-28 Thread CCIE Voice
Rahul:

You may need a 'no huntstop' under your ephone-dn 10

Example:
ephone-dn  5  octo-linec
number 4300 no-reg primary
conference ad-hoc
no huntstop


If that does not work do a 'sh sccp' and post that output.


On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Rahul Kapor rahul.kapo...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi all ,

 Cbarge in SRST not working

 here is my config

 ephone-dn-template  1
  call-forward busy 914082026002
  call-forward noan 914082026002 timeout 3
 ephone-template  1
  softkeys idle  Redial Newcall Cfwdall
 ephone-dn  10  octo-line
  number 
  conference ad-hoc
 ephone  1
  privacy off
  device-security-mode none
 ephone  2
  privacy off
  device-security-mode none

 telephony-service
  sdspfarm units 1
  sdspfarm tag 1 HQ-CONF
  no privacy
  conference hardware
  srst mode auto-provision none
  srst ephone template 1
  srst dn template 1
  srst dn line-mode octo
  max-ephones 15
  max-dn 15
  ip source-address 14.160.116.40 port 2000
  system message you are in fallback
  voicemail 914082026002
  max-conferences 12 gain -6
  moh music-on-hold.au
  multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 1.1.1.1 14.160.116.40
  transfer-system full-consult
  create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Mar 27 2011 01:04:02

 Phones gets registered to SRST and shared line is seen on phone display.
 i created octo dn for conf and conf bridge is registered to SRST.

 Please let me know if i am missing any thing.

 thx,
 Rahul

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware conference is stuck in state TCP_CONN_ERROR

2011-03-28 Thread Hough, Earl
Is this for integration with UCM or CME?  If CME, what version did you specify?

Earl Hough
CCIE #16508 (RS/Security/Voice)

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rahul Kapor
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 11:58 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware conference is stuck in state 
TCP_CONN_ERROR


Hi all ,

I am trying to register my hardware conference to cucm/cme   but it is stuck in 
TCP_CONN_ERROR error state.

sh sccp
Conferencing Oper State: ACTIVE_IN_PROGRESS - Cause Code: TCP_CONN_ERROR
Active Call Manager: NONE
TCP Link Status: CONNECT_PENDING, Profile Identifier: 1
Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
...
...

reloaded the router but did not help!

Please suggest.

Thx,
Rahul
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware conference is stuck in state TCP_CONN_ERROR

2011-03-28 Thread chase mergenthal

What is in your telephony-service section of your config?


 -Chase



Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:27:30 +0530
From: rahul.kapo...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware conference is stuck in state   
TCP_CONN_ERROR


Hi all ,

I am trying to register my hardware conference to cucm/cme   but it is stuck in 
TCP_CONN_ERROR error state.

sh sccp
Conferencing Oper State: ACTIVE_IN_PROGRESS - Cause Code: TCP_CONN_ERROR

Active Call Manager: NONE
TCP Link Status: CONNECT_PENDING, Profile Identifier: 1
Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
...
...

reloaded the router but did not help!

Please suggest.


Thx,
Rahul


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cbarge in SRST nt working !

2011-03-28 Thread Bo Gao
Hi,

You might want to add ephone type under the ephone.

Hope it helps,


Bo

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Rahul Kapor rahul.kapo...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi all ,

 Cbarge in SRST not working

 here is my config

 ephone-dn-template  1
  call-forward busy 914082026002
  call-forward noan 914082026002 timeout 3
 ephone-template  1
  softkeys idle  Redial Newcall Cfwdall
 ephone-dn  10  octo-line
  number 
  conference ad-hoc
 ephone  1
  privacy off
  device-security-mode none
 ephone  2
  privacy off
  device-security-mode none

 telephony-service
  sdspfarm units 1
  sdspfarm tag 1 HQ-CONF
  no privacy
  conference hardware
  srst mode auto-provision none
  srst ephone template 1
  srst dn template 1
  srst dn line-mode octo
  max-ephones 15
  max-dn 15
  ip source-address 14.160.116.40 port 2000
  system message you are in fallback
  voicemail 914082026002
  max-conferences 12 gain -6
  moh music-on-hold.au
  multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 1.1.1.1 14.160.116.40
  transfer-system full-consult
  create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Mar 27 2011 01:04:02

 Phones gets registered to SRST and shared line is seen on phone display.
 i created octo dn for conf and conf bridge is registered to SRST.

 Please let me know if i am missing any thing.

 thx,
 Rahul

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware conference is stuck in state TCP_CONN_ERROR

2011-03-28 Thread Prashant Patel
Hi Rahul,

I have seen this before and the solution was a router reboot.

HTH
Prashant

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Rahul Kapor rahul.kapo...@gmail.comwrote:


 Hi all ,

 I am trying to register my hardware conference to cucm/cme   but it is
 stuck in TCP_CONN_ERROR error state.

 sh sccp
 Conferencing Oper State: ACTIVE_IN_PROGRESS - Cause Code: TCP_CONN_ERROR
 Active Call Manager: NONE
 TCP Link Status: CONNECT_PENDING, Profile Identifier: 1
 Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
 ...
 ...

 reloaded the router but did not help!

 Please suggest.

 Thx,
 Rahul

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] A 2nd Corporate Directory

2011-03-28 Thread Bo Gao
Hi all,

Is it possible to set up a Secondary corporate directory as an IP Phone
service that coexist with the primary corporate directory in CUCM 7 or CUCM
8?

Thank you,


Bo
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to configure cucme to support phoneview

2011-03-28 Thread bruno
hello guys,
  
 great news Unified FX release their lab version. how to configure cucme to 
support phoneview?  i can not find any tutorial on their website. could someone 
help?
  
 Best Regards,
 bruno___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP SRST does not work

2011-03-28 Thread Randall Saborío Cubero
Looks like the calls are going through dial-peer 9 as soon a you hit the
1. What do you have on that dial-peer ?

Another option would be to configure SIP dial rules so the phone will
wait to get all 4 digits before sending the invite to CME.

El lun, 28-03-2011 a las 20:11 +0200, Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier
escribió:
 Hi all,
 
  
 
 I have problems with SIP SRST. The SIP phone registers ok in SRST
 mode, but I can’t make or receive any type of calls (internal or
 external).
 
  
 
 Analyzing Internal calls I’ve seen that when PhoneA (1001) dials Phone
 B (1002). Only the first number of the called number is sent. The
 debug ccsip messages shows the first invite with the 1 but there are
 not any notify messages for kpml with all the other digits
 
  
 
 Have you found any problem with SRST? Is there anything I am missing
 in the config?
 
  
 
 Thanks in advance!
 
  
 
  
 
 voice service voip 
 
  allow-connections h323 to sip
 
  allow-connections sip to h323
 
  allow-connections sip to sip
 
  sip
 
   bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.240
 
   bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.240
 
   registrar server
 
  
 
  
 
 voice register global
 
  system message SRST
 
  max-dn 4
 
  max-pool 4
 
  !
 
 voice register pool  1
 
  id network 192.168.21.0 mask 255.255.255.0
 
  dtmf-relay rtp-nte
 
  codec g711ulaw
 
  
 
 BRANCH1#sh voice register dial-peers 
 
 dial-peer voice 40001 voip
 
  destination-pattern 1002
 
  redirect ip2ip
 
  session target ipv4:192.168.21.69:5060
 
  session protocol sipv2
 
  dtmf-relay rtp-nte
 
  digit collect kpml
 
  codec  g711ulaw bytes 160
 
   after-hours-exempt   FALSE  
 
  
 
 dial-peer voice 40002 voip
 
  destination-pattern 1001
 
  redirect ip2ip
 
  session target ipv4:192.168.21.68:5060
 
  session protocol sipv2
 
  dtmf-relay rtp-nte
 
  digit collect kpml
 
  codec  g711ulaw bytes 160
 
   after-hours-exempt   FALSE   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 BRANCH1#
 
 *Mar 28 18:58:38.216: //-1//DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
 
Calling Number=1, Called Number=1, Peer Info
 Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
 
 *Mar 28 18:58:38.216: //-1//DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
 
Match Rule=DP_MATCH_DEST; Called Number=1
 
 *Mar 28 18:58:38.216: //-1//DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
 
Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_DEST
 
 *Mar 28 18:58:38.216: //-1//DPM/dpMatchPeersMoreArg:
 
Result=SUCCESS(0) 
 
List of Matched Outgoing Dial-peer(s): 
 
  1: Dial-peer Tag=9
 
 *Mar 28
 18:58:38.216: //-1//DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
 
Calling Number=1001, Called Number=, Voice-Interface=0x0,
 
Timeout=TRUE, Peer Encap Type=ENCAP_VOIP, Peer Search
 Type=PEER_TYPE_VOICE,
 
Peer Info Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
 
 *Mar 28
 18:58:38.216: //-1//DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
 
Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_ORIGINATE; Incoming
 Dial-peer=40002
 
 *Mar 28
 18:58:38.220: //-1//DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
 
Calling Number=1001, Called Number=, Voice-Interface=0x0,
 
Timeout=TRUE, Peer Encap Type=ENCAP_VOIP, Peer Search
 Type=PEER_TYPE_VOICE,
 
Peer Info Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
 
 *Mar 28
 18:58:38.220: //-1//DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
 
Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_ORIGINATE; Incoming
 Dial-peer=40002
 
 *Mar 28
 18:58:38.220: //-1/3968292780B0/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
 
Calling Number=1001, Called Number=1, Voice-Interface=0x0,
 
Timeout=TRUE, Peer Encap Type=ENCAP_VOIP, Peer Search
 Type=PEER_TYPE_VOICE,
 
Peer Info Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
 
 *Mar 28
 18:58:38.220: //-1/3968292780B0/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
 
Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_ORIGINATE; Incoming
 Dial-peer=40002
 
 *Mar 28 18:58:38.228: //-1/3968292780B0/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
 
Calling Number=, Called Number=1, Peer Info
 Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
 
 *Mar 28 18:58:38.228: //-1/3968292780B0/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
 
Match Rule=DP_MATCH_DEST; Called Number=1
 
 *Mar 28 18:58:38.228: //-1/3968292780B0/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
 
Result=Partial Matches(1) after DP_MATCH_DEST
 
 *Mar 28 18:58:38.228: //-1/3968292780B0/DPM/dpMatchPeersMoreArg:
 
Result=MORE_DIGITS_NEEDED(1)
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 Francesc Xavier Roig Borrell
 
 Network Senior Consultant
 
 Integración de Sistemas y Tecnología
 
 C/Santander, 49-51
 
 Barcelona 08020
 
 Tel. Fijo: (+34) 934965108 ext 64697
 
 Tel. Móvil / Fax: (+34) 647 32 21 55 (24697) / (+34) 934965161 
 
 email: francesc.ro...@tecnocom.es
 
 http://www.tecnocom.es
 
  
 
 Por favor, antes de imprimir este mensaje, asegúrate de que es
 necesario. Ayudemos a cuidar el medio ambiente
 
 Este mensaje puede contener información confidencial o privilegiada.
 Si le ha llegado por error, rogamos no haga uso del mismo, avise al
 remitente y bórrelo. Consulte aviso legal
 This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If it
 has been sent to