[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Can't connect via hardware VPN
Edgar I just signed on fir my 08:00am and can't connect either, did anyone get back to you Sent from my iPad This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not set CSS in the Device Pool?
I never see this done for some reason. With the number of phones were talking about it isn't a huge time saver, but I'll take every second I can get at this point. I did my entire mock lab this way yesterday and everything worked great except the aar-group which I still needed on the line itself. But everything worked exactly like I had set it per device. Am I missing something or am I just out of the loop and people are doing it this way? -- Thanks, Mark L Reed ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fractional MGCP
Hi Kshitij, Logically it should use next GW in RG ( to next RG , etc..) when all 3 channels are full in first GW. (As per your obsevations it should be) But better to test as at times CUCM server behaves very strange. In fact a TAC Engineer ( from India ) told me to use this service parameter to support fractional MGCP (when I opened a TAC case for fractional E1 in MGCP long time back). Cisco docs never say to use this service parameter for fractional E1/T1 MGCP it is for temporary busy-out of channels (maintenance purposes). I guess a TAC expert has guided this way to overcome a bug in a particular code or to give a quick solution for fractional MGCP ( rather than time-consuming manual MGCP configuration) also not to affect cisco's PVDM sales volume. Thank you for your findings if Ash can check again this with TAC experts it would be very nice. Ken On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Kshitij Singhi martinian.ksin...@gmail.comwrote: Hmm... will max out my MGCP channels on Monday and check if calls move out of the backup endpoint configured in the RG/RL. Not sure if I tested this when I was practicing but as far as I remember, I have. Will update soon!!! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not set CSS in the Device Pool?
yes you right , the exam is not to test scalability but in real live this option on the dp is very usefull and in case of aar , the aar group will work for everything on the dp level but the line , and this is a huge time saver in case of aar , Ash On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Mark Reed marklr...@gmail.com wrote: I never see this done for some reason. With the number of phones were talking about it isn't a huge time saver, but I'll take every second I can get at this point. I did my entire mock lab this way yesterday and everything worked great except the aar-group which I still needed on the line itself. But everything worked exactly like I had set it per device. Am I missing something or am I just out of the loop and people are doing it this way? -- Thanks, Mark L Reed ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not set CSS in the Device Pool?
Normally different devices have different calling privileges ( local only , international , premium) that's why a single CSS is not used per DP. One exception is Line Device approach where CSS can be applied to DP call block RPs are included in line CSS of individual phones. But with Local RGs , this approach has gone obsolete On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Mark Reed marklr...@gmail.com wrote: I never see this done for some reason. With the number of phones were talking about it isn't a huge time saver, but I'll take every second I can get at this point. I did my entire mock lab this way yesterday and everything worked great except the aar-group which I still needed on the line itself. But everything worked exactly like I had set it per device. Am I missing something or am I just out of the loop and people are doing it this way? -- Thanks, Mark L Reed ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not set CSS in the Device Pool?
It will work. However, in typical senarios and exam you might require one phone to have different treatment from other in same device pool where you will need different css/pt for different phones in same location , ie device pool. Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Oct 8, 2011, at 8:55 PM, Mark Reed marklr...@gmail.com wrote: I never see this done for some reason. With the number of phones were talking about it isn't a huge time saver, but I'll take every second I can get at this point. I did my entire mock lab this way yesterday and everything worked great except the aar-group which I still needed on the line itself. But everything worked exactly like I had set it per device. Am I missing something or am I just out of the loop and people are doing it this way? -- Thanks, Mark L Reed ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fractional MGCP
hello All , well, i apologize if i got off track in disccussing this issue in the alias ( this apology including your Kshitji ) i think ccie is getting me aggressive anyway , i reason you cannot find this workaround in any of cisco doc is the fact that we dont support this feature , mgcp is not desinged to work in fraction connection however cisco have interduce this feature because mgcp is more prefered for the customer as its very easy to setup , i worked on a very heavy mgcp case in the past cauing me to read the whole rfc of the mgcp and i i was in touch with the TAC expert and the DE in charge of this feature and the discussion ended to say that TAC doesnt support fraction mgcp and this is a temp workaround you can use in the time being tpo avoid cal failure when the ccm will setup call on a non-used bchannel and this feature is under study for feature full suppor on the ccm nativly but we dont have any estimated release or time yet , Thanks Ash On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kshitij, Logically it should use next GW in RG ( to next RG , etc..) when all 3 channels are full in first GW. (As per your obsevations it should be) But better to test as at times CUCM server behaves very strange. In fact a TAC Engineer ( from India ) told me to use this service parameter to support fractional MGCP (when I opened a TAC case for fractional E1 in MGCP long time back). Cisco docs never say to use this service parameter for fractional E1/T1 MGCP it is for temporary busy-out of channels (maintenance purposes). I guess a TAC expert has guided this way to overcome a bug in a particular code or to give a quick solution for fractional MGCP ( rather than time-consuming manual MGCP configuration) also not to affect cisco's PVDM sales volume. Thank you for your findings if Ash can check again this with TAC experts it would be very nice. Ken On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Kshitij Singhi martinian.ksin...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm... will max out my MGCP channels on Monday and check if calls move out of the backup endpoint configured in the RG/RL. Not sure if I tested this when I was practicing but as far as I remember, I have. Will update soon!!! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fractional MGCP
Ok everything seems clear now. As Ashraf said TAC doesn't support fractional MGCP that's why TAC Engineers go with service parameter approach (just to help customer quickly) But CUCM support fractional MGCP we have to manually configure MGCP on Router (Expected in CCIE level). Thanks On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com wrote: hello All , well, i apologize if i got off track in disccussing this issue in the alias ( this apology including your Kshitji ) i think ccie is getting me aggressive anyway , i reason you cannot find this workaround in any of cisco doc is the fact that we dont support this feature , mgcp is not desinged to work in fraction connection however cisco have interduce this feature because mgcp is more prefered for the customer as its very easy to setup , i worked on a very heavy mgcp case in the past cauing me to read the whole rfc of the mgcp and i i was in touch with the TAC expert and the DE in charge of this feature and the discussion ended to say that TAC doesnt support fraction mgcp and this is a temp workaround you can use in the time being tpo avoid cal failure when the ccm will setup call on a non-used bchannel and this feature is under study for feature full suppor on the ccm nativly but we dont have any estimated release or time yet , Thanks Ash On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kshitij, Logically it should use next GW in RG ( to next RG , etc..) when all 3 channels are full in first GW. (As per your obsevations it should be) But better to test as at times CUCM server behaves very strange. In fact a TAC Engineer ( from India ) told me to use this service parameter to support fractional MGCP (when I opened a TAC case for fractional E1 in MGCP long time back). Cisco docs never say to use this service parameter for fractional E1/T1 MGCP it is for temporary busy-out of channels (maintenance purposes). I guess a TAC expert has guided this way to overcome a bug in a particular code or to give a quick solution for fractional MGCP ( rather than time-consuming manual MGCP configuration) also not to affect cisco's PVDM sales volume. Thank you for your findings if Ash can check again this with TAC experts it would be very nice. Ken On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Kshitij Singhi martinian.ksin...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm... will max out my MGCP channels on Monday and check if calls move out of the backup endpoint configured in the RG/RL. Not sure if I tested this when I was practicing but as far as I remember, I have. Will update soon!!! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not set CSS in the Device Pool?
You can have DPs for devices in that will have similar behavior and set the CSSs accordingly in the DPs. EJF From: Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com To: Mark Reed marklr...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Saturday, October 8, 2011 3:47 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not set CSS in the Device Pool? Normally different devices have different calling privileges ( local only , international , premium) that's why a single CSS is not used per DP. One exception is Line Device approach where CSS can be applied to DP call block RPs are included in line CSS of individual phones. But with Local RGs , this approach has gone obsolete On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Mark Reed marklr...@gmail.com wrote: I never see this done for some reason. With the number of phones were talking about it isn't a huge time saver, but I'll take every second I can get at this point. I did my entire mock lab this way yesterday and everything worked great except the aar-group which I still needed on the line itself. But everything worked exactly like I had set it per device. Am I missing something or am I just out of the loop and people are doing it this way? -- Thanks, Mark L Reed ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fractional MGCP
FYI, This was last year I got from TAC for one 16- B channels PRI with MGCP case. ( I also have another 10 - B channels customer site). The workaround also works in SRST. === ... As per our conversation, fractional PRI is unfortunately not currently supported in MGCP Gateways as explained in the TAC Case Collection TACCC K14305072. https://www.ciscotaccc.com/kaidara-advisor/voice/showcase?case=K14305072 Regards, CUCM Team Cisco TAC Support Engineer Email: ...@cisco.com == Solution # K14305072 Title The user is unable to configure fractional or partial T1 PRI with MGCP and Cisco CallManager Core Issue Currently, Cisco CallManager does not support the configuration or use of a fractional PRI when using Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) PRI backhaul. This issue is documented in Cisco bug IDs CSCed41207 and CSCdw29259. For more information, refer to the Requirements section of How to Configure MGCP with Digital PRI and Cisco CallManager. Resolution For a workaround, use H.323 instead of MGCP if a fractional PRI is necessary. As an alternative, busy-out the B-Channels that you are not using in Cisco CallManager by performing these steps: Note: This procedure is not TAC-supported. == CSCed41207 Bug Details CallManager needs support for MGCP fractional PRI Symptom: Cisco CallManager will not work with a fractional PRI when using MGCP PRI backhaul. Condition: Currently , Cisco CallManager does not support the configuration or use of a fractional PRI when using MGCP PRI backhaul. Workaround: Use H.323 instead of MGCP if a fractional PRI is necessary. = CSCdw29259 Bug Details CCM does not allow fractional T1/E1 config for PRI Symptom: User cannot configure fractional T1/E1 PRI on the CCM. Parallel configuration can be made on the IOS gateways. Conditions: Applicable to nny T1/E1 PRI config. Workaround: Use full T1/E1 PRI timeslots while configuring the controllers. Further Problem Description: This is an enhancement on the CUCM side == Thanks. KLI -- From: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2011 3:59 PM To: Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Kshitij Singhi martinian.ksin...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fractional MGCP hello All , well, i apologize if i got off track in disccussing this issue in the alias ( this apology including your Kshitji ) i think ccie is getting me aggressive anyway , i reason you cannot find this workaround in any of cisco doc is the fact that we dont support this feature , mgcp is not desinged to work in fraction connection however cisco have interduce this feature because mgcp is more prefered for the customer as its very easy to setup , i worked on a very heavy mgcp case in the past cauing me to read the whole rfc of the mgcp and i i was in touch with the TAC expert and the DE in charge of this feature and the discussion ended to say that TAC doesnt support fraction mgcp and this is a temp workaround you can use in the time being tpo avoid cal failure when the ccm will setup call on a non-used bchannel and this feature is under study for feature full suppor on the ccm nativly but we dont have any estimated release or time yet , Thanks Ash On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kshitij, Logically it should use next GW in RG ( to next RG , etc..) when all 3 channels are full in first GW. (As per your obsevations it should be) But better to test as at times CUCM server behaves very strange. In fact a TAC Engineer ( from India ) told me to use this service parameter to support fractional MGCP (when I opened a TAC case for fractional E1 in MGCP long time back). Cisco docs never say to use this service parameter for fractional E1/T1 MGCP it is for temporary busy-out of channels (maintenance purposes). I guess a TAC expert has guided this way to overcome a bug in a particular code or to give a quick solution for fractional MGCP ( rather than time-consuming manual MGCP configuration) also not to affect cisco's PVDM sales volume. Thank you for your findings if Ash can check again this with TAC experts it would be very nice. Ken On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Kshitij Singhi martinian.ksin...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm... will max out my MGCP channels on Monday and check if calls move out of the backup endpoint configured in the RG/RL. Not sure if I tested this when I was practicing but as far as I remember, I have. Will update soon!!! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] [UCCX7-UCCX_IPIVR_7_0_1.iso on Windows 2003 R2 Enterprise]
Greetings, I'm trying to install UCCX7-UCCX_IPIVR_7_0_1.iso on Windows 2003R2 Enterprise. I've been told that it will work with certain modifications, registry hacks and the like. I'm trying to find out the details of how to go about doing this and wanted to run it by the group. Any information would be appreciated since this is my third install and hopefully the last. Another question I have is do you do the complete SQL installation. Is there a link out there that explains all this that I'm missing. Installing on ESXI VMWARE VM. Thank you --ms ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] (no subject)
___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
