Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [cisco-voip] DSCP to COS map question

2009-05-12 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
Ready for MediaNet RFC 4594 and 12 Queues?

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Video/qosmrn.html

-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net 
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 2:01 AM
To: Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net; 
mciarfe...@iplogic.com
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DSCP to COS map question

Well, the upside is I am not taking the test with the crappy 3550s and
6500s... I am taking it with new code 3750s.


Jonathan

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila
 wrote:
> This is a new OS image. I am glad that Cisco finally decided to switch. The 
> IOS on the lab boxes however have the older 26 code based on the IOS on the 
> lab blueprint and talking from late last year experience.
>
> Jorge
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Jonathan Charles 
> To: Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila
> Cc: Wes Sisk ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
> ; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net 
> ; Michael Ciarfello 
> Sent: Mon May 11 18:47:50 2009
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DSCP to COS map question
>
> I just did it on a 3750 running 12.2(50)SE
>
> and I got
>
> mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
>
> Which throws CS3 into CoS 3
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila
>  wrote:
>> It's the other way around.  Auto Qos Defaults are set for AF31 so the 
>> qos-dscp map default is 26. To this day I don't understand why the Cisco 
>> Switch codes still default to af31 on the Auto QoS settings
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 5:22 PM
>> To: Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila
>> Cc: Wes Sisk; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net; 
>> Michael Ciarfello
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DSCP to COS map question
>>
>> Which was my original question, we used to need to change it because
>> it set it for CS3 and Cisco wanted AF31, now we can leave it alone...
>>
>>
>> J
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila
>>  wrote:
>>> If the exam does not say set for AF31 you have to set it to 24 to match CS3 
>>> which is the current Siganlling DSCP used accorting to the SRST (Remember 
>>> the CCIE Lab is based on this document in most respects)
>>>
>>> Jorge
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net 
>>> [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
>>> Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 2:15 PM
>>> To: Wes Sisk
>>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net; Michael 
>>> Ciarfello
>>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DSCP to COS map question
>>>
>>> Well, my question is do we need to modify it... we used to...
>>>
>>>
>>> J
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Wes Sisk  wrote:
 Is it caused by change in recommended DSCP values over time.  ~4 years ago
 we changed recommended values for signaling at least.

 /Wes

 On Sunday, May 10, 2009 2:53:26 AM, Jonathan Charles 
 wrote:

 Apologies for the lack of clarification...

 The switch is a 3750-24PS

 The lab is v3.

 And yes, I know to trust CoS on trunks and DSCP on access ports to
 servers...



 Jonathan

 On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Michael Ciarfello
  wrote:


 I'm a little confused what you are asking exactly.  And I think you have 
 the
 mappings backwards from what your premise statement is.

 Depending on switch  / router model or software the COS to DSCP map may
 configure 24 or 26.  If the requirement is to put signaling traffic in CS3,
 then use 24.  Maybe the requirement would be to put it in AF31 so use 26.

 Also study up on trust cos vs trust dscp and where to use each and on what
 piece of equipment, etc.  Some 6500 line cards have all sorts of
 restrctions.  QoS SRND has a great discussion of these.

 If you have a home lab a sniffer is a great tool to check out the markings
 at various places and make sure they are carrying through.

 ah crap, power is flickering, gotta go.

 
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
 [jonv...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2009 5:43 PM
 To: cisco-v...@puck.nether.net; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DSCP to COS map question

 So, autoQoS adds this:

 mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56

 Yet we are advised to do this:

 mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 26 34 46 48 56

 Remapping AF31 to COS 3

 Well the default puts CS3 into COS 3, which is what you want to d

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [cisco-voip] SIP & SK phones show different time in CME

2010-02-28 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
You can also do a "ntp master" on the router and sync to itself -jason

-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net 
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adel Abushaev
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 6:41 PM
To: Pavan K
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP & SK phones show different time in CME

SKINNY phone gets time from CME, SIP phone gets time from configured
NTP. Is your CME in sync with NTP source?

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Pavan K  wrote:
>
> I am running 8.3.2.27 on the SK phones. IOS is 12.4(20)T2 and CME 7.0(0)
> The SK phone seems to be showing incorrect time.
> Has anybody seen this before ?
> -Pavan
>
> ===
> voice register global
>  mode cme
>  source-address 142.103.66.254 port 5060
>  max-dn 10
>  max-pool 2
>  load 7961GE term61.default
>  load 7961 term61.default
>  authenticate register
>  timezone 43
>  time-format 24
>  tftp-path flash:
>  create profile sync 0007641738744237
>  ntp-server 142.3.64.254 mode anycast
> ==
> ntp server 142.3.64.254
> telephony-service
>  load 7970 term70.default
>  load 7971 term71.default
>  max-ephones 2
>  max-dn 10 no-reg
>  ip source-address 142.103.66.254 port 2000
>  system message Your current Options
>  time-zone 43
>  time-format 24
>  max-conferences 12 gain -6
>  transfer-system full-consult
>  create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Feb 27 2010 22:28:52
> ===
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-v...@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-v...@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Clarification: mls qos map cos-dscp

2010-03-21 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
I'd be curious when "auto qos voip" changed to CS3 or if it has, but you should 
change it.

The feeling is that QoS SRND needs to be updated for MediaNet/RFC4594 and that 
Auto QoS should only be used in most basic scenarios.

The QoS Baseline recommends marking Call-Signaling to CS3. However, currently 
most Cisco IP
Telephony products mark Call-Signaling to AF31. A marking migration from AF31 
to CS3 is under way
within Cisco, but in the interim it is recommended that both AF31 and CS3 be 
reserved for
Call-Signaling and that Locally-Defined Mission-Critical Data applications be 
marked to a temporary
placeholder non-standard DSCP, such as 25. Upon completion of the migration, 
the QoS Baseline
marking recommendations of CS3 for Call-Signaling and AF31 for Locally-Defined 
Mission-Critical
Data applications should be used. These marking recommendations are more in 
line with RFC 2474 and
RFC 2597.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Berry, Matthew J.
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 5:55 AM
To: CCIE Voice OSL (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com)
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Clarification: mls qos map cos-dscp

The QoS SRND states that the "auto qos voip" command adds the following config 
to the router:

C2970(config)# mls qos
C2970(config)# mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 26 32 46 48 56

Earlier in the SRND, around page 40, it says that the old marking for audio 
signaling was AF31 (26).  That is the same DSCP marking listed above.

As part of our "best-practice" scenario, should we be changing the command to 
consider audio signaling as CS3 (24)?  The command would need to be modified:

C2970(config)# mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56

Is this true?  Otto, can you weigh in on this one?

Thanks!

Matthew Berry

Digital Footprint:
Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
Skype: ciscovoiceguru
1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010



-
Disclaimer: 

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [cisco-voip] Plz help, anyone knows the order of operation of Calling party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1?

2010-04-16 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
He was using a XT9 predictive keyboard

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Berry, Matthew J.
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 1:47 PM
To: Roger Källberg; jeremy co; le...@uoguelph.ca
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [cisco-voip] Plz help, anyone knows the order 
of operation of Calling party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1?

It took me two days to realize that EPNM = External Phone Number Mask

#fail

:)

Matthew Berry, CCVP, Sr. Unified Communications Engineer
mjbe...@kroll.com

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Roger Källberg
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 2:02 AM
To: jeremy co; le...@uoguelph.ca
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [cisco-voip] Plz help, anyone knows the order 
of operation of Calling party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1?

Hi Jeremy,
You got this answer from Otto Sanchez on your other post on the same topic.

"Hello Jeremy,



I think that an important fact to know is that cg/cd xform patterns get

matched at the time the rp is being hit, so cg/cd xforms will override the

transformations you perform at the rp level,



If you configure the EPNM in a TP, the cg number getting to the rp will be

the globalized number, right?, in this case, a cg xform pattern will be

matched only if it corresponds to that EPNM,



Please let me know if this clears up things a little bit for you,"



I would say that the answer you got is pretty strait forward, but if not test 
it out in all sort of ways in your lab and I think it will click for you.

Best regards
Roger Källberg
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ

Från: jeremy co [jeremy.coo...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 15 april 2010 04:22
Till: le...@uoguelph.ca
Kopia: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net
Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [cisco-voip] Plz help, anyone knows the order of 
operation of Calling party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1?
well, I know this order but CngPTP break these rules.

Check out this scenario:   call>TP>RP---> SLRG->GW

,check EPNM on TP and RP ,put CngPTP on GW.it overrides.
,check EPNM  only on RP ,put CngPTP on GW.it does not override.
,check EPNM  only on TP  ,put CngPTP on GW.it  overrides.



How these mess works with CngPTP?


Jeremy



On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:13 PM, mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> 
wrote:
The farther down the chain you go the override happens. So:

gateway overrides RL
RL overrides RG
RG overrides RP
RP overrides phone

Pretty sure about this, but I'm sure someone will chime in.

Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst
Computing & Communications
University of Guelph
519-824-4120 x56354

...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)

[XKJ2000]


On 2010-04-14, at 10:09 PM, jeremy co 
mailto:jeremy.coo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,

Anyone knows how calling party transformation pattern order of operation in 
CUCM 7.0.1?


I just got confused and docs are pretty weak in this area.   It should override 
RP,RG,RL configuration. But apparently it would not!

What is the relationship of checking EPNM on TPRP,GW and CngPTP ?



I really appreciate any comment on this. Any doc that explain this relationship?

Cheers

Jeremy
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-v...@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




-
Disclaimer: 

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME unitcast MOH

2010-04-18 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
Check your file size compared to mine below, try testing with multicast as well 
just to verify.

Telephony-service
moh music-on-hold.au
multicast moh 239.1.1.10 port 16384


debug ephone moh
debug ephone detail mac-address 0026.99EF.9CAE

Show flash: all
32  496521 Mar 29 2004 16:40:00 music-on-hold.au

Show process memory
276  145964 8975688 16  0.55%  0.52%  0.53%   0 Skinny MOH Serve

Show process cpu
336   0   2  0  0.00%  0.00%  0.00%   0 Skinny MOH Event



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Angel Perez
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 2:52 PM
To: osl osl
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME unitcast MOH

Hi all:

Is this the only command needed to allow unicast moh on cme and sccp phones?


telephony-service
 moh music-on-hold.au

Of course music-on-hold.au file should be present on flash

dir
 1  -rw-  496521  Feb 22 2010 02:01:12 -08:00  music-on-hold.au

I have also change from:

ephone 1
no multicast-moh

to

ephone 1
multicast-moh

and viceversa but I still hear beep beep beep instead moh, is a strange 
behaviour becouse with the same configuration at other gw (and sip phones) i'm 
able to hear the music...

Any idea would be apreciated

Regards

Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it 
now.



-
Disclaimer: 

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Converting CUE to Integrate with UCM

2010-04-21 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
I recall you have to reload (losing mailboxes, etc)  the NM-CUE v8.1 to switch 
between CUCM/CME as the startup integration screens are different based upon 
integration type. Not sure what you meant by moving back and forth.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Cotter
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:05 PM
To: Berry, Matthew J.; osl osl
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Converting CUE to Integrate with UCM

Yes, this is the only requirement.   I have performed it a couple of times now 
with no issues moving back and forth between the two types of integration.

From: Berry, Matthew J. [mailto:mjbe...@krollontrack.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:04 AM
To: Jeff Cotter; osl osl
Subject: RE: Converting CUE to Integrate with UCM

Jeff -

Did you ever find out the answer to your question?  I'm curious.

Matthew Berry, CCVP, Sr. Unified Communications Engineer
mjbe...@kroll.com

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Cotter
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 6:12 PM
To: osl osl
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Converting CUE to Integrate with UCM

Is the only requirement to go from CME integration to UCM to load the proper 
license file?  This is my companies equipment not proctor labs. I would like to 
be able to move back and forth similar to proctor labs but am unsure it is as 
easy as just loading the proper license file.



-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [cisco-voip] FYI: VMware ESXi is now free

2008-07-30 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
The lack of a 64-bit Cisco VPN Client (we don't do SSL VPNs for
AnyConnect) is frustrating.  How hard is to port 32-bit to 64-bit code
when others like Nortel/Checkpoint are did it long ago.  Instead I run
Virtual PC with XP for 32-bit Cisco VPN client when needed.

Once CallManager starts exceeding 4GB RAM I can see Cisco porting
application to 64-bit.

One 64-bit Windows 2003 R2 domain controller can carry the same load as
multiple 32-bit Windows 2003 R2 domain controllers.

You could get more users per cluster with fewer servers with 64-bit
applications.

I bet within ten years (July 30, 2018) a Quad Core by Sixteen (64
processors) becomes cost effective/common for data centers. What will be
after 64-bit?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carter, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:42 PM
To: Jonathan Charles; Michael Thompson
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: VMware ESXi is now free

ESXi installation just bombed on a MCS-7815i-3.0. The IBM X306 server is
not in the hardware compatibility list.

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:39 AM
To: Michael Thompson
Cc: Carter, Bill; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: VMware ESXi is now free

Yeah, that won't work, ESX is very hardware specific

Just a side note, because I see this misunderstanding a lot.

On a 32-bit OS, you have a 32-bit memory address space, which equates
to roughly 4 billion address locations (about 4GB of RAM supported),
however, Windows allocates a nice sized chunk to I/O and other
stuff...

If you want to recognize more than about 3.5GB, you need to run a
64-bit OS (I am running 64-bit Vista with no problems (except the
silly CIsco VPN client doesn't work)...




Jonathan

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Michael Thompson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just meant as a platform to install the VMWare on.
>
> I have VMServer (free version) running on Server 2008.  I'm running 08
> because I have 4Gb or RAM and XP wasn't acknowledging all my memory
(which
> kinda pissed me off a LOT).
>
> My thought is to install Linux as a base OS (less overhead resources
meaning
> more available for my VMWare).  Not to mention, Vista and 2008 don't
like
> NVidia chipset MoBo hardware.  They're intel bigots.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:31 PM
> To: Michael Thompson
> Cc: Carter, Bill; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: VMware ESXi is now free
>
> You don't need to know Linux...
>
> The installation is quite easy... just next a lot (add IPs and
> stuff...) and then after it completes it will tell you to open a web
> browser and then install the infrastructure 3 client.then you can do
> VMWare stuff...
>
> Personally, I think Workstation is more suitable for our needs (I am
> running Workstation 6) and I have CCM 4.1/IPCC a Unity 4 box, a CUCM
> 6.1 box and Unity 7 box, plus an XP VM for stuff...
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Michael Thompson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Bummer, I was hoping that they relaxed that a little so I could get
rid of
>> the Microsoft overhead of my server.
>>
>> Don't know enough about Linux to install on that.  May have to learn
> Ubuntu.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:08 PM
>> To: Michael Thompson
>> Cc: Carter, Bill; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: VMware ESXi is now free
>>
>> you need a server from the hardware compatibility list...
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Michael Thompson
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Has  anyone played with installing it on generic hardware though?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My problem with ESX is that I tried to install it on my commercial
NVidia
>>> chipset based MoBo and it bombed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> MT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carter,
Bill
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:42 AM
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>> Subject: [cisco-voip] FYI: VMware ESXi is now free
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.vmware.com/download/esxi/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use b

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : Multicast Moh from Flash of BR1

2010-06-25 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
Credit go to Jane Ryer for the inital version/info, here is expanded info;

Customer didn't want music on hold to cross the WAN for a remote spoke site. 
They wanted music to multicast from the router flash card out a local PRI for 
the site and for it to work under CME-as-SRST.

1. ip multicast routing and ip pim dense-mode in router (does it need to go on 
int serial0/0/0:23 where the PRI is? It does need to go on the interface that 
has the 7900 phones)
2. ccm-manager music-on-hold | moh music-on-hold.au | multicast moh
239.1.1.3 port 16384  configured in router (you can use any private 
multicast address but has to match CallManager)(adding the interface fixed my 
MoH not working)
3. Enable Multicast Audio Sources on this CallManager MOH Server
4. CallManager MoH Server Base Multicast IP Address = 239.1.1.3
5. CallManager MoH Server Base Multicast Port Number = 16384
6. CallManager MoH Server Increment Multicast on = IP Address
7. CallManager MoH ServerMax Hops = 5 (or less if you want to keep it off WAN)
8. MOH Audio Source:  SampleAudioSource (1) = Allow Multicasting
9. In Media Resource Group =  Use Multicast for MOH Audio (requires at
least one multicast MOH resource)
10. Cisco IP Voice Media Streaming App = 711 mulaw and 729 Annex A
selected.
11. Media Resource Group List configured in Device Pool level with
appropriate MRG.
12.MOHMulticastResourceActive counter got incremented when put the call
On-Hold.
13. Verify you put the music-on-hold.au on the flash:

Smaple Running-config from IOS 15.0(1)XA3
ccm-manager music-on-hold
ccm-manager config server 10.10.55.133 (CallManager IP)
ccm-manager config
ccm-manager sccp local FastEthernet0/0

telephony-service
moh music-on-hold.au
multicast moh 239.1.1.11 port 16384 route 10.225.106.2

show ccm-manager music-on-hold
show ip mroute
show ip multicast interface
show ephone moh (only in SRST mode)



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of naoufal kerboute
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 3:53 PM
To: Ashar Siddiqui
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : Multicast Moh from Flash of BR1

Hi Ashar,

I need to play in case to forget the stress of the lab, it's coming soon.
I think you are right the problem on the UCM side, I will try to restart the 
Media voice app and back to you.
The output of show ccm-manager music-on-hold

BR1-RTR#show ccm-manager music-on-hold
Current active multicast sessions : 0
So ucm didn't provide any multicast to the router.

Regards



De : Ashar Siddiqui [siddas...@gmail.com]
Date d'envoi : vendredi 25 juin 2010 18:51
À : naoufal kerboute
Cc : ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Objet : Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multicast Moh from Flash of BR1
First of all, why are you playing? You should be labbing properly as voice 
field is not a playground..

Joke aside... ;)

What is your "'show ccm-manager music-on-hold" ?

If no MoH streams are shown by this command then CCM has failed to provide the 
gateway with MoH

Also keep in mind Tone on hold means there is a CM misconfiguration. Silence 
means the RTP is not getting to the router.

Your case is CCM configuration issue. Check configuration again properly.

Check at Pub CCM > the MOH server - region/Device pool selected properly, reset 
it and then login to subscriber..go to the same place and reset it from there 
as well.

Also restart Media Voice app.

The output you posted means that you have proper telephony-service 
configuration (max-dn/max-ephone etc)...problem is at cucm side..

You can now continue playing..

Ash>

naoufal kerboute wrote:
Hi,

I'm playing with multicast moh over the flash of router, the configuration 
looks good and I can see in the debug the moh traffic, but on the PSTN phone I 
heard only bips.

below the output of debug ephone moh:
Jun 25 18:03:04.729: MoH route If Vlan240 ETHERNET 10.10.201.1 via ARP
Jun 25 18:03:04.729: MoH route If Loopback0 46 10.10.110.2 via 10.10.110.2
Jun 25 18:03:09.173: ifs_read flash:music-on-hold.au end of file at 492545 read 
3976 = 496521
Jun 25 18:03:09.177: moh tail fill from 24 at 0x4A0E9FF8 length 4024
Jun 25 18:03:10.017: MoH route If Vlan240 ETHERNET 10.10.201.1 via ARP
Jun 25 18:03:10.017: MoH route If Loopback0 46 10.10.110.2 via 10.10.110.2


I've created a region who use g711 with other regions, activated the multicast 
on the source file and the moh server.


Any Ideas?





___

For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com






-
Disclaimer: 

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in e

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] allManager 4.1(3) Can I run a SQL query to force logout everyone Extension Mobility?

2010-06-25 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 

In CallManager 4.1(3) is there a way to force logout everyone?



-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] pguser and Extension Mobility User Device Profile association

2010-06-28 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 

When using UCCE/ICM should the Extension Mobility User Device Profile (UDP) be 
associated to the pguser application user?

I read a NetPro forum article that said only the physical phone should be 
associated to pguser, not the User Device Profile (Extension Mobility).



-
Disclaimer: 

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Music on Hold

2010-06-28 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
How did you infer he's using multicast and/or CME? I must be missing something.

Check IP Voice Media Streaming App is enabled for G729, check regions on phones 
versus gateway (and/or Common Device Configuration/Device Pool).

I'm guessing gateway is G711 and phones are G729 and you IP Voice Media 
Streaming App is only setup for G711.   Just a guess.



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Berry, Matthew J.
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 11:34 AM
To: Afzal Bhutta; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Music on Hold

CUCME does not support intercluster multicast MOH.

Matthew Berry, CCVP, Sr. Unified Communications Engineer
mjbe...@kroll.com

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Afzal Bhutta
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 8:36 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Music on Hold

Dear Study Friends,
I have issue with MOH from HQ to BR1 when I hold for MOH .My MOH is working 
fine for PSTN user and vice versa also working fine with in the sites.
For some reason when I call from HQ to SIteB or BR1 it does not working for 
some reason.Please can some one puts light on it what would be the issue.
Thanks for support



-
Disclaimer: 

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hide a particular user in theCorporateDirectory

2010-09-13 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
Disable Empty Search is a workaround, but I wish Cisco would go back to having 
CiscoPrivateUser in the description field not show those accounts like it did 
in 4x.  Most admin don't like filters but don't want service accounts being 
shown, even though it's pretty easy to get a list of all users from AD with 
other tools.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Tam Nhu
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 10:26 AM
To: bkvalent...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hide a particular user in theCorporateDirectory

I have tried all the workaround and suggestions, but none of them appear to be 
worked or fulfill the requirement of 'no display in the corporate directory'.  
Yes, you can put "~" or some special char in the front of First/Last (in both 
AD or DC directory) to hide them from the search by name, but it still appears 
in the search at the bottom as "~admin, ~crs".  Again, the requirement is NO 
DISPLAY.

Thanks for all the input and suggestion...I give up this one and except no 
credit from customer then:)

TN.


-
Disclaimer: 

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Prompting change pin in phone

2010-09-25 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
I don't think so.

I know newer version of CCMUser (web page) allow end users to change their pin, 
and it would be a great feature request, or a one-time password that expires in 
30 days.

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ravindra Lakpriya
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 3:03 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Prompting change pin in phone

Hi Guys,

Can we prompt change pin for the end users when they are login to the extension 
mobility service  for the first time  ??


--
Ravindra Lakpriya
+94 773 532 094
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com
-
Disclaimer: 

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Prompting change pin in phone

2010-09-25 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
I was thinking of audio interaction sililar to Unity enrollment.

Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!

- Reply message -
From: "Marcio Reesink" 
Date: Sat, Sep 25, 2010 5:07 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Prompting change pin in phone
To: "Jason Aarons (US)" , "lakpr...@gmail.com" 
, "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 


CM 8.0+ has this new feature.

--
Marcio Reesink

> From: jason.aar...@us.didata.com
> To: lakpr...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 07:41:24 -0400
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Prompting change pin in phone
>
> I don't think so.
>
> I know newer version of CCMUser (web page) allow end users to change their 
> pin, and it would be a great feature request, or a one-time password that 
> expires in 30 days.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ravindra Lakpriya
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 3:03 AM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Prompting change pin in phone
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Can we prompt change pin for the end users when they are login to the 
> extension mobility service for the first time ??
>
>
> --
> Ravindra Lakpriya
> +94 773 532 094
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> -
> Disclaimer:
>
> This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
> designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
> intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
> this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
> from your computer. Thank you.
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com


-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Single Number Reach

2010-10-01 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
Remote Destination Profile has a Rerouting Calling Search Space.

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Holloway
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 3:39 AM
To: osl osl
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Single Number Reach

I'm having a hard time when an internal extension calls another internal 
extension that uses SNR, the "From" phone number on the PSTN phone is 4 digits 
instead of 7.  For example, extension 2001 calls 2003, and 2003 simultaneously 
rings a PSTN phone number.  The display on the PSTN phone says HqPh1 (2001) 
instead of the 7 digit or 10 digit number. 

I have created PT_SNR which is assigned to CSS_SNR.  I have CSS_SNR assigned to 
the Remote Destination Profile for both CSS and Redirecting CSS.  My SNR number 
is +14086347694 and I have a route pattern that contains \+1408.6347694 which 
egresses the RL_HQ_ONLY (this is not Standard Local Route Group).  I also 
created a Translation Pattern  with PT_SNR and I have checked Use External 
Phone Number Mask.  I was expecting this to take the 4 digit Calling number and 
insert the External mask instead. I tried following the steps in the Mock Lab 
guide (I believe it is Lab 6) but I still cannot get it working.  Any 
assistance would be appreciated.  Perhaps someone has a blog post?

Thanks,
Mark

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com
-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Upgrading and Licensing

2010-10-12 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
Upgrading from older versions of CUE to newer (eg 7x, 8x) you won't get the 8 
Base Port Licenses and there is no place to download .lic files on cisco.com, 
you have to call Cisco TAC as licens...@cisco.com 
doesn't seem to understand how to issue the default 8-port license.  You would 
think if 8 ports is a default license, then the upgrade would install a 8-port 
license.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Amr Sherif
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 6:34 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Upgrading and Licensing


Hello Experts,

I have CUE version 3.2.3 and i want to upgrade to 7.0 which is the exam version 
. The license for my CUE is CME mode and it's embedded inside the system when i 
bought it so i dont have the license as external file , So here is my concern ; 
If i upgrade to version 7.0 and download CME & CCM licenses from my cisco 
account ,is this will work okay or the license have to be purchased not be 
downloaded.

Another Concern, If somehow after upgrading to ver. 7.0 the license is not work 
,or any problem just show up ,can i reverse back to my version 3.2.3 and the 
built-in license by executing the command "offline"
 then "restore factory default".

Please any help would be appreciated.

Best regards,


Amr Sherif
Senior Network Voice Engineer
CCNA,CCNP,CCVP and CCIE Voice Written (Certified)
CCIE Voice Lab (In Progress)




-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] mls qos trust dscp on Nexus 7k

2010-10-14 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
Is there a way to tell a port (eth1/1) on a Nexus 7010 to trust dscp?

Normally for Unity/CallManager/IOS Voice Gateways I put a "mls qos trust dscp" 
on the those interface. What is Nexus equivalent?


-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Matching Router/Switch Configuration tool

2010-10-28 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
WinDiff, Microsoft Word 2010 has Compare Documents which is identical.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of SYED HUSSAIN
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 11:54 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Matching Router/Switch Configuration tool

Hi all,

Please let me know the name of the tool to match 2 routers/switch configuration 
line by line.


Regards


-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SES Callbox with VG224/SCCP ?

2010-11-09 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
Anyone used a SES (http://www.selectses.com/manuals.htm) Callbox with a 
VG224/SCCP ?  Callbox rings phone for stcpap plar , you answer then you get 
hangup.  Wonder if it's a voltage problem with line??


voice-port 2/23
timeouts ringing infinity

sccp plar
  voiceport 2/23 dial 7729640001



-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Intergration of Unit express with SRST router

2010-11-24 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
I'm looking at Unity Express 8.0.2 running on a 2911 with IOS 15.1.2T, I have 
call-manager-fallback setup and the phones work fine, but when I press Messages 
I get a fast busy, dialing the CTI Route Point for the Auto Attendant also 
fails from PSTN/PRI.

I'm re-reading the manual, maybe I missed something but I thought the Messages 
button would work with SRST 8x

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mritunjay Kumar
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 10:04 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Intergration of Unit express with SRST router

Hi All,

how to integrate unity express with SRST router when it is registered to cucm 
through JTAPI and  loses connectivity with cucm ?
CUE is installed in SRST router.

any pointer ?

Regards,
Mj


-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Intergration of Unit express with SRST router

2010-11-24 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
So the default dial peer for the auto attendant already points to CallManager, 
should I add the same autoattendant dial peers with a higher preference to the 
ip address of the CUE for SRST? So normal route is via CallManager/CTI Route 
Point but during wan failure those timeout and it goes direct to CUE?

Since the phones are SIP for use with SIP SRST ,  I had this which doesn't 
account for the CUE AA when WAN is down;

voice register pool  1
id network 10.1.222.0 mask 255.255.255.0
preference 1
incoming called-number
 dtmf-relay rtp-nte
voice-class codec 1

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Adam Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 1:54 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Intergration of Unit express with SRST router

Take a look here:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps5520/products_configuration_example09186a0080289ef0.shtml#srst

HTH
-Adam
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Mritunjay Kumar 
mailto:mjs...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi All,

how to integrate unity express with SRST router when it is registered to cucm 
through JTAPI and  loses connectivity with cucm ?
CUE is installed in SRST router.

any pointer ?

Regards,
Mj

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding subscriber problem - need ideas

2010-11-25 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
I had this problem with a recent new install of 8.0.2c (it was pre-installed on 
the hard drive on new MCS server) .   I couldn't find anything wrong, the 
password I reset 20 times, etc.

I upgraded the pub to 8.0.3a and did a subscriber  install with software update 
on the subscriber and it worked fine.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Wael Agina
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 5:29 PM
To: Michael Dietrich
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding subscriber problem - need ideas

Dearl Michael

  First i have applied license for two nodes and only using one and there is 
one available node on the lices [for sub]
Also I set the name with uppercase all lettters and tried on sub both upper 
case and lower case but not working.
I did reset security password many times to cisco12345 on pub and used it on 
sub but no sccess.

Is there any troubleshooting steps can be done on pub during connectivity test 
on sub ?

Regards,
Wael Agina
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Michael Dietrich 
mailto:mdd2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Make sure that you are entering the device name of the PUB correctly (spelling) 
during the SUB set up

Make sure the server name for SUB is spelled correctly on the PUB (case 
sensitive)...AND. that you have a second server license installed on the 
PUB, to be used by the SUB



On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Wael Agina 
mailto:waelag...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Prashant ,

  Yes I added it on the publisher on server list and on the CM Group.
But still it fails the connectivity test when installing subscriber software.

Regards,
Wael Agina

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Prashant Patel 
mailto:prashantpatel...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,

Hope you have added the Sub in the list of servers on the Publisher.

HTH
Prashant
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Wael Agina 
mailto:waelag...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear All,

   I am implemnting new UC project at one customer location.
I installed the first node - publisher - succefully.
Now whenevr i add the 2nd node - subscriber - it tried to test connectivity to 
first node but always fails and installion terminated.
There is network connectivity between the two nodes and from publisher i can 
ping the new node - subscriber.
Also I reset the security password on the publisher [using Set password user 
security on CLI]

Any ideas as the connectivity test always fails ?

--

Thanks and Best Regards,
Wael Agina

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com




--

Thanks and Best Regards,
Wael Agina

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com




--

Thanks and Best Regards,
Wael Agina


-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME GUI looks weird

2010-12-08 Thread Jason Aarons (US) 
Don't you have to session into the module to run initial setup, before the Web 
GUI will be active.

In the session you run a setup that tells it whether your using CallManager or 
CallManager express.

Also can you ping it from router?

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Baktha Muralidharan
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 12:19 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME GUI looks weird

Hi folks

As part of Lab 3A, I configured for GUI access into the CME, as follows

  ip http server
  ip http authentication local
  ip http path flash:/GUI

  and under telephony-service

 web admin system name admin pass cisco


After this, I go into browser, and try to access the ccme.html page, I first 
see the window go grey as expected, then see "View window" displayed at the top 
left corner, and then the page comes up with the tabs "Configure", "Voice 
Mail", "Administration", "Report" and "Help". However, the screen looks weird 
and pressing the mouse on the tabs do not show the pull down menus. I have 
pop-up blocker turned OFF on my browser. tried Mozilla as well as IE, to no 
avail.

I then looked into flash:/GUI/CME_GUI_README.TXT, and on the first line, it 
says "CME GUI Version 7.0.0.1".

any hints?

Thanks in advance,
/Baktha


-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com