[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA Delay/Latency Between Prompts

[Jason Granat]

When using MVA in my practice lab the prompts play fine, calls work fine, etc., 
but there seems to be, what I feel, is a long pause between prompts, like 5 
seconds or so. It doesn't sound like much but it is just long enough to start 
wondering if I got disconnected, or if it didn't receive digits, or something 
like that. Is this normal, or is this due to running CUCM in VMWare? Other CUCM 
functions seem to be just as snappy as a full blown appliance. I haven't used 
this on a full blown appliance, so I have no frame of reference. The H.323 
gateway hosting the VXML script is a 2821, so I would hope it is not the 
router. I know it's not the beefiest, but it would seem silly to me to need to 
deploy a high end box just to alleviate delay between MVA prompts.

Thanks,

Jason




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cBarge on CME ????

[Jason Granat]

Also, check to see if normal ad-hoc hardware conf works first before tshooting 
cbarge.

Sent while mobile.

On Mar 23, 2010, at 20:06, "Mike Brooks" 
<2xcci...@gmail.com<mailto:2xcci...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Yes I have those still same results...?

!
ephone-dn  5  octo-line
 number 3555 no-reg
 conference ad-hoc
 no huntstop
!
!
ephone-dn  6  octo-line
 number 3666 no-reg
 conference ad-hoc
 preference 1
 no huntstop
!
!
ephone-dn  7  octo-line
 number 3777 no-reg
 conference ad-hoc
 preference 2
 no huntstop
!
!
ephone-dn  8  octo-line
 number 3888 no-reg
 conference ad-hoc
 preference 3
 no huntstop
!



On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Mark Nigh 
<<mailto:mn...@netelligent.com>mn...@netelligent.com<mailto:mn...@netelligent.com>>
 wrote:
Yes. That's right.

Ephon-dn x octel
Number 
Conference ad-hoc



Mark Nigh
Systems Engineer
<mailto:mn...@netelligent.com>mn...@netelligent.com<mailto:mn...@netelligent.com>
 (p) 314.392.6926


-Original Message-
From: <mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com> 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
 
[mailto:<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>]
 On Behalf Of Jason Granat
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 9:55 PM
To: Mike Brooks
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cBarge on CME 

Pretty sure you need some ad-hoc conf dn's

Sent while mobile.

On Mar 23, 2010, at 19:49, "Mike Brooks" 
<<mailto:2xcci...@gmail.com>2xcci...@gmail.com<mailto:2xcci...@gmail.com>> 
wrote:

> On CME I am having issues with cBarge.  I have a shared DN 3010 on
> line 2 of both ephone 1 and 2.  When a call comes in on 3010 and is
> picked up by either phone I can see the display of remote in use.
> When I click on the cBarge key on the phone nothing happens.  It is
> the same regardless of which phone is trying to barge in.  I must be
> missing something.  Any suggestions ?
>
> !
> ephone-template  1
>  softkeys remote-in-use  CBarge Newcall
> !
> ephone-dn  10  octo-line
>  number 3010 no-reg primary
> !
> ephone  1
>  privacy off
>  mac-address 001B.5495.1AB9
>  ephone-template 1
>  type 7961GE
>  button  1:1 2:10
> !
> ephone  2
>  privacy off
>  mac-address 000C.85B9.8739
>  ephone-template 1
>  type 7960
>  button  1:2 2:10
> !
> !
> BR2-RTR#sho dspfarm profile 1
> Dspfarm Profile Configuration
>  Profile ID = 1, Service = CONFERENCING, Resource ID = 1
>  Profile Description :
>  Profile Service Mode : Non Secure
>  Profile Admin State : UP
>  Profile Operation State : ACTIVE
>  Application : SCCP   Status : ASSOCIATED
>  Resource Provider : FLEX_DSPRM   Status : UP
>  Number of Resource Configured : 2
>  Number of Resource Available : 2
>  Codec Configuration
>  Codec : g711ulaw, Maximum Packetization Period : 30 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
>  Codec : g711alaw, Maximum Packetization Period : 30 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
>  Codec : g729ar8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
>  Codec : g729abr8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
>  Codec : g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 , Transcoder: Not
> Required
>  Codec : g729br8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
> BR2-RTR#
>
>
>
> Thx,
> Mike
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit <http://www.ipexpert.com/> 
> www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>



<http://slash128.com/>http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
<http://www.ipexpert.com/> www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>

This transmission and any attached files are privileged, confidential or 
otherwise the exclusive property of the intended recipient or Netelligent 
Corporation. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this 
transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please contact us immediately by responding to this message or by 
telephone (314-392-6900) and promptly destroy the original transmission and its 
attachments.





http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cBarge on CME ????

[Jason Granat]

The last ad-hoc dn shouldn't have no hunstop but I don't think that matters. Is 
telephony-service using conf hardware?

Sent while mobile.

On Mar 23, 2010, at 20:06, "Mike Brooks" 
<2xcci...@gmail.com<mailto:2xcci...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Yes I have those still same results...?

!
ephone-dn  5  octo-line
 number 3555 no-reg
 conference ad-hoc
 no huntstop
!
!
ephone-dn  6  octo-line
 number 3666 no-reg
 conference ad-hoc
 preference 1
 no huntstop
!
!
ephone-dn  7  octo-line
 number 3777 no-reg
 conference ad-hoc
 preference 2
 no huntstop
!
!
ephone-dn  8  octo-line
 number 3888 no-reg
 conference ad-hoc
 preference 3
 no huntstop
!



On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Mark Nigh 
<<mailto:mn...@netelligent.com>mn...@netelligent.com<mailto:mn...@netelligent.com>>
 wrote:
Yes. That's right.

Ephon-dn x octel
Number 
Conference ad-hoc



Mark Nigh
Systems Engineer
<mailto:mn...@netelligent.com>mn...@netelligent.com<mailto:mn...@netelligent.com>
 (p) 314.392.6926


-Original Message-
From: <mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com> 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
 
[mailto:<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>]
 On Behalf Of Jason Granat
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 9:55 PM
To: Mike Brooks
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cBarge on CME 

Pretty sure you need some ad-hoc conf dn's

Sent while mobile.

On Mar 23, 2010, at 19:49, "Mike Brooks" 
<<mailto:2xcci...@gmail.com>2xcci...@gmail.com<mailto:2xcci...@gmail.com>> 
wrote:

> On CME I am having issues with cBarge.  I have a shared DN 3010 on
> line 2 of both ephone 1 and 2.  When a call comes in on 3010 and is
> picked up by either phone I can see the display of remote in use.
> When I click on the cBarge key on the phone nothing happens.  It is
> the same regardless of which phone is trying to barge in.  I must be
> missing something.  Any suggestions ?
>
> !
> ephone-template  1
>  softkeys remote-in-use  CBarge Newcall
> !
> ephone-dn  10  octo-line
>  number 3010 no-reg primary
> !
> ephone  1
>  privacy off
>  mac-address 001B.5495.1AB9
>  ephone-template 1
>  type 7961GE
>  button  1:1 2:10
> !
> ephone  2
>  privacy off
>  mac-address 000C.85B9.8739
>  ephone-template 1
>  type 7960
>  button  1:2 2:10
> !
> !
> BR2-RTR#sho dspfarm profile 1
> Dspfarm Profile Configuration
>  Profile ID = 1, Service = CONFERENCING, Resource ID = 1
>  Profile Description :
>  Profile Service Mode : Non Secure
>  Profile Admin State : UP
>  Profile Operation State : ACTIVE
>  Application : SCCP   Status : ASSOCIATED
>  Resource Provider : FLEX_DSPRM   Status : UP
>  Number of Resource Configured : 2
>  Number of Resource Available : 2
>  Codec Configuration
>  Codec : g711ulaw, Maximum Packetization Period : 30 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
>  Codec : g711alaw, Maximum Packetization Period : 30 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
>  Codec : g729ar8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
>  Codec : g729abr8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
>  Codec : g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 , Transcoder: Not
> Required
>  Codec : g729br8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
> BR2-RTR#
>
>
>
> Thx,
> Mike
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit <http://www.ipexpert.com/> 
> www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>



<http://slash128.com/>http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
<http://www.ipexpert.com/> www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>

This transmission and any attached files are privileged, confidential or 
otherwise the exclusive property of the intended recipient or Netelligent 
Corporation. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this 
transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please contact us immediately by responding to this message or by 
telephone (314-392-6900) and promptly destroy the original transmission and its 
attachments.





http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cBarge on CME ????

[Jason Granat]

Pretty sure you need some ad-hoc conf dn's

Sent while mobile.

On Mar 23, 2010, at 19:49, "Mike Brooks" <2xcci...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On CME I am having issues with cBarge.  I have a shared DN 3010 on
> line 2 of both ephone 1 and 2.  When a call comes in on 3010 and is
> picked up by either phone I can see the display of remote in use.
> When I click on the cBarge key on the phone nothing happens.  It is
> the same regardless of which phone is trying to barge in.  I must be
> missing something.  Any suggestions ?
>
> !
> ephone-template  1
>  softkeys remote-in-use  CBarge Newcall
> !
> ephone-dn  10  octo-line
>  number 3010 no-reg primary
> !
> ephone  1
>  privacy off
>  mac-address 001B.5495.1AB9
>  ephone-template 1
>  type 7961GE
>  button  1:1 2:10
> !
> ephone  2
>  privacy off
>  mac-address 000C.85B9.8739
>  ephone-template 1
>  type 7960
>  button  1:2 2:10
> !
> !
> BR2-RTR#sho dspfarm profile 1
> Dspfarm Profile Configuration
>  Profile ID = 1, Service = CONFERENCING, Resource ID = 1
>  Profile Description :
>  Profile Service Mode : Non Secure
>  Profile Admin State : UP
>  Profile Operation State : ACTIVE
>  Application : SCCP   Status : ASSOCIATED
>  Resource Provider : FLEX_DSPRM   Status : UP
>  Number of Resource Configured : 2
>  Number of Resource Available : 2
>  Codec Configuration
>  Codec : g711ulaw, Maximum Packetization Period : 30 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
>  Codec : g711alaw, Maximum Packetization Period : 30 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
>  Codec : g729ar8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
>  Codec : g729abr8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
>  Codec : g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 , Transcoder: Not
> Required
>  Codec : g729br8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 , Transcoder:
> Not Required
> BR2-RTR#
>
>
>
> Thx,
> Mike
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD stupid problem, it's driving me nuts

[Jason Granat]

N/M, the script was stripped from the emailfor some reason...

Sent while mobile.

On Mar 23, 2010, at 8:08, "Jason Granat"  wrote:

> I think I see your problem, the script appears empty :-)
>
> Sent while mobile.
>
> On Mar 23, 2010, at 8:07, "jeremy co"  wrote:
>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> http://slash128.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD stupid problem, it's driving me nuts

[Jason Granat]

I think I see your problem, the script appears empty :-)

Sent while mobile.

On Mar 23, 2010, at 8:07, "jeremy co"  wrote:

> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA Disconnects after prompt

[Jason Granat]

Ahh, I don't think I have that checked, but I will look. Thx!

Sent while mobile.

On Mar 17, 2010, at 19:48, "Berry, Matthew J."
 wrote:

> Sorry. Thinking of wrong term.
>
> Sounds like capabilities are not being established. Are you using
> h323 fast start?
> - Sent from my Blackberry
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Jason Granat 
> To: Berry, Matthew J.
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
> Sent: Wed Mar 17 21:32:12 2010
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA Disconnects after prompt
>
> 10 seconds on the nose every time. Isn't T.38 for fax?
>
> Sent while mobile.
>
> On Mar 17, 2010, at 19:20, "Berry, Matthew J."
>  wrote:
>
>> How many seconds go by? Could you be hitting the T38 timeout value?
>> Perhaps something with call capabilities are not being setup?
>>
>> - Sent from my Blackberry
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
>> >>
>> To: Jason Granat 
>> Cc:  
>> Sent: Wed Mar 17 21:12:44 2010
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA Disconnects after prompt
>>
>> On a side note SNR works to the same remote destination from the same
>> phone, so I would imagine my partitions and CSS's are correct...
>>
>> Sent while mobile.
>>
>> On Mar 17, 2010, at 19:09, "Jason Granat"  wrote:
>>
>>> I've seen this discussed quite a bit. I have had it working, but
>>> after
>>> another attempt from scratch I am able to dial the DID from a remote
>>> destination, I get the 'welcome' message, then after a few seconds
>>> the
>>> call disconnects. If I call from a non-remote destination I get the
>>> prompt to input my remote destination and then after a few seconds
>>> it
>>> drops. I've debugged the script, ISDN, dial-peers, etc., but
>>> having a
>>> mental block. Is this a symptom of a common problem that I am
>>> drawing
>>> a blank on?
>>>
>>> Sent while mobile.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://slash128.com
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>
>> http://slash128.com
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> http://slash128.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA Disconnects after prompt

[Jason Granat]

10 seconds on the nose every time. Isn't T.38 for fax?

Sent while mobile.

On Mar 17, 2010, at 19:20, "Berry, Matthew J."
 wrote:

> How many seconds go by? Could you be hitting the T38 timeout value?
> Perhaps something with call capabilities are not being setup?
>
> - Sent from my Blackberry
>
> - Original Message -
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
>  >
> To: Jason Granat 
> Cc:  
> Sent: Wed Mar 17 21:12:44 2010
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA Disconnects after prompt
>
> On a side note SNR works to the same remote destination from the same
> phone, so I would imagine my partitions and CSS's are correct...
>
> Sent while mobile.
>
> On Mar 17, 2010, at 19:09, "Jason Granat"  wrote:
>
>> I've seen this discussed quite a bit. I have had it working, but
>> after
>> another attempt from scratch I am able to dial the DID from a remote
>> destination, I get the 'welcome' message, then after a few seconds
>> the
>> call disconnects. If I call from a non-remote destination I get the
>> prompt to input my remote destination and then after a few seconds it
>> drops. I've debugged the script, ISDN, dial-peers, etc., but having a
>> mental block. Is this a symptom of a common problem that I am drawing
>> a blank on?
>>
>> Sent while mobile.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://slash128.com
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> http://slash128.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA Disconnects after prompt

[Jason Granat]

On a side note SNR works to the same remote destination from the same
phone, so I would imagine my partitions and CSS's are correct...

Sent while mobile.

On Mar 17, 2010, at 19:09, "Jason Granat"  wrote:

> I've seen this discussed quite a bit. I have had it working, but after
> another attempt from scratch I am able to dial the DID from a remote
> destination, I get the 'welcome' message, then after a few seconds the
> call disconnects. If I call from a non-remote destination I get the
> prompt to input my remote destination and then after a few seconds it
> drops. I've debugged the script, ISDN, dial-peers, etc., but having a
> mental block. Is this a symptom of a common problem that I am drawing
> a blank on?
>
> Sent while mobile.
>
>
>
> http://slash128.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA Disconnects after prompt

[Jason Granat]

I've seen this discussed quite a bit. I have had it working, but after
another attempt from scratch I am able to dial the DID from a remote
destination, I get the 'welcome' message, then after a few seconds the
call disconnects. If I call from a non-remote destination I get the
prompt to input my remote destination and then after a few seconds it
drops. I've debugged the script, ISDN, dial-peers, etc., but having a
mental block. Is this a symptom of a common problem that I am drawing
a blank on?

Sent while mobile.



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCx 7.x

[Jason Granat]

I haven't tried that route. If you get the NFR kit it comes with the OS discs.

Sent while mobile.

On Mar 12, 2010, at 13:22, "Thomas Koch" 
mailto:koch1...@comcast.net>> wrote:

No…Just WIN2k3 enterprise…

Thomas J Koch
Unified Communicatons Consultant
CCDA, CCNA, CCVP
Cisco IPT Design Specalist
CompuCom
Cell: 630-808-4910
E-mail:thom.k...@compucom.com

From: Jason Granat [mailto:j...@slash128.com]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 3:05 PM
To: wilson.sam...@usc-bt.com<mailto:wilson.sam...@usc-bt.com>; 
koch1...@comcast.net<mailto:koch1...@comcast.net>; 
vpree...@cisco.com<mailto:vpree...@cisco.com>; <mailto:adefilabi...@gmail.com> 
adefilabi...@gmail.com<mailto:adefilabi...@gmail.com>
Cc: <mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCx 7.x

Do you have the OS ISOs? I created a VM with 2 nics (one left disabled), 1 
proc, 2G RAM, 80G IDE Drive, and optical drive. I used the HP OS 1.3a disc. 
After the OS is loaded and rebooted it will start the add new hardware wizard. 
Don’t click that. Just run the install VM Ware tools. After the tools are 
installed the drivers get updated and the wizard goes away. Then reboot again. 
Assign an IP to one NIC. Leave the second NIC disabled. Install the UCCX IP IVR 
disc. That’s it… You could install VNC if you want instead of managing from the 
VMWare console. I’m sure other VM settings combos might work but this has 
always worked for me.

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
wilson.sam...@usc-bt.com<mailto:wilson.sam...@usc-bt.com>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:41 PM
To: koch1...@comcast.net; vpree...@cisco.com; adefilabi...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCx 7.x

Hi All,

I tried installing it on a VMWare 2k3 Server, but never succeeded so far, if 
anyone has done it, please could you do me a favor by sharing your secret?

Regards
Wilson Samuel

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Thomas Koch
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 2:49 PM
To: 'Vishal Preenja'; 'Omotayo'
Cc: <mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCx 7.x

Yes…of course
Thanks…

Thomas J Koch
Consultant
CCDA, CCNA, CCVP
Cisco IPT Design Specalist
CompuCom
Cell: 630-808-4910
E-mail:thom.k...@compucom.com

From: Vishal Preenja [mailto:vpree...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:39 PM
To: 'Thomas Koch'; 'Omotayo'
Cc: <mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCx 7.x

Hi Thomas,

   Are ladies also allowed to reply? ☺

Pls check the hardware compatibility matrix below:

<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_compatibility/matrix/crscomtx.pdf>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_compatibility/matrix/crscomtx.pdf

HP DL380 G3 is not supported with IPCC 7.x onwards.


Thanks and Regards,

Vishal Preenja




From: Thomas Koch [mailto:koch1...@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:50 PM
To: 'Vishal Preenja'; 'Omotayo'
Cc: <mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCx 7.x

Gent’s,
Has anyone had any issue loading IPCC express 7.x on non Cisco hardware..?
I tried to load it on an HP DL380 G3 (MCS-7845 equivalent) and it said “non 
Cisco hardware” install will now stop”
T

E-mail:thomas.k...@compucom.com

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Vishal Preenja
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:46 PM
To: 'Omotayo'
Cc: <mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 49, Issue 68

Yes, I am referring to MRG that is there in the MRGL of the trunk.

Just check that you should not have a MTP allocated for that call from CCM to 
CME.
You can verify by making a call and then check in RTMT that whether Transcoder 
is being invoked or MTP.


Thanks and Regards,

Vishal Preenja



From: Omotayo [mailto:adefilabi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:25 PM
To: Vishal Preenja
Cc: <mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<mailt

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCx 7.x

[Jason Granat]

Do you have the OS ISOs? I created a VM with 2 nics (one left disabled), 1 
proc, 2G RAM, 80G IDE Drive, and optical drive. I used the HP OS 1.3a disc. 
After the OS is loaded and rebooted it will start the add new hardware wizard. 
Don't click that. Just run the install VM Ware tools. After the tools are 
installed the drivers get updated and the wizard goes away. Then reboot again. 
Assign an IP to one NIC. Leave the second NIC disabled. Install the UCCX IP IVR 
disc. That's it... You could install VNC if you want instead of managing from 
the VMWare console. I'm sure other VM settings combos might work but this has 
always worked for me.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
wilson.sam...@usc-bt.com
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:41 PM
To: koch1...@comcast.net; vpree...@cisco.com; adefilabi...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCx 7.x

Hi All,

I tried installing it on a VMWare 2k3 Server, but never succeeded so far, if 
anyone has done it, please could you do me a favor by sharing your secret?

Regards
Wilson Samuel

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Thomas Koch
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 2:49 PM
To: 'Vishal Preenja'; 'Omotayo'
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCx 7.x

Yes...of course
Thanks...

Thomas J Koch
Consultant
CCDA, CCNA, CCVP
Cisco IPT Design Specalist
CompuCom
Cell: 630-808-4910
E-mail:thom.k...@compucom.com

From: Vishal Preenja [mailto:vpree...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:39 PM
To: 'Thomas Koch'; 'Omotayo'
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCx 7.x

Hi Thomas,

   Are ladies also allowed to reply? :)

Pls check the hardware compatibility matrix below:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_compatibility/matrix/crscomtx.pdf

HP DL380 G3 is not supported with IPCC 7.x onwards.


Thanks and Regards,

Vishal Preenja




From: Thomas Koch [mailto:koch1...@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:50 PM
To: 'Vishal Preenja'; 'Omotayo'
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCx 7.x

Gent's,
Has anyone had any issue loading IPCC express 7.x on non Cisco hardware..?
I tried to load it on an HP DL380 G3 (MCS-7845 equivalent) and it said "non 
Cisco hardware" install will now stop"
T

E-mail:thomas.k...@compucom.com

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Vishal Preenja
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:46 PM
To: 'Omotayo'
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 49, Issue 68

Yes, I am referring to MRG that is there in the MRGL of the trunk.

Just check that you should not have a MTP allocated for that call from CCM to 
CME.
You can verify by making a call and then check in RTMT that whether Transcoder 
is being invoked or MTP.


Thanks and Regards,

Vishal Preenja



From: Omotayo [mailto:adefilabi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:25 PM
To: Vishal Preenja
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 49, Issue 68

Hello,

Also what do you mean by MTP above transcoder. Are you reffering to the MRGL?
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Vishal Preenja 
mailto:vpree...@cisco.com>> wrote:
It will work as I described.

Can you send me the detailed ccm traces from all servers in the clusters or get 
me access of your box.


Thanks and Regards,

Vishal Preenja




From: Omotayo [mailto:adefilabi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:33 PM
To: Vishal Preenja
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 49, Issue 68

Hello Visha,

when i did it as you described.

when sccp phone call sip phone on the cme, i get a reorder tone
when sip phone on the cme calls the sccp phone on the hq, it disconnects when 
hwq phone is picked and the sip phone continues to ring

How can this be fixed
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Vishal Preenja 
mailto:vpree...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi,

  While making a call from the UCM to CME Sip phone ( because you have
G711ulaw configured in the voice register pool), if you are getting
disconnect then you will need transcoder in the MRGL of Sip trunk/ GK trunk
and also make sure that you don't have MTP listed above transcoder. If there
is MTP configured above transcoder, it will be allocated when transcoder is
requested and the call will fail.

Thanks and regards,
Vishal Preenja.

Hi Jeff,

Would you please tell us more about the call flow and the end to end codec
requirements for this call. If doing g.729 over the wan, and your sip phone
is using g.711 you should transcode at br2,

Plea

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN Call Distortion Between T1/E1

[Jason Granat]

Hi Otto,

Thanks for the advice. In your second paragraph the opposite was actually the 
case. The E1 voice-ports were originally showing a-law, and had distortion. I 
hard set u-law on the E1 ports between the gateway and PSTN router and the 
distortion went away. Perhaps that is what you meant?

I took a look at the link you included. I'll have to do some testing but my 
main question is how is this handled in the real world at the provider level?

Thanks,

Jason

From: Otto Sanchez [mailto:o...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 4:59 AM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN Call Distortion Between T1/E1

Hello Jason,

E1's and T1's will always use a-law and u-law companding mechanism 
respectively, this is used to give more "resolution" to low voice frequencies 
when digitizing an analog signal (the mechanism is also used in the other end 
for digital to analogue conversion), each mechanism is designed exclusively to 
work with its voice digital standard and cannot be used conversely,

In that sense, my guess is that before applying that command in your E1 port, 
the companding type was u-law, you can verify this using the sh voice port 
command (perhaps the default configuration of a-law was somehow overwritten by 
a cptone command in the same port configuration), and when you hardcoded the 
a-law companding type everything worked as expected,

I also found a note in the Cisco IOS Voice Port Configuration Guide, which says 
that the command is used when cross-connecting in a local router,

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/ios/voice/voiceport/configuration/guide/vp_cfg_digital_vps_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1009871


HTH,
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Jason Granat 
mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:
So I've got this partially figured out. It had to do with the compand-type. E1 
was a-law and T1 was u-law. I set the E1 side for u-law and it sounds correct 
now.

The final thing I am trying to figure out is how to 'trans-compand' (if that is 
the correct term) on the PSTN gateway. As it sits I had to change the 
compand-type between the PSTN and E1 gateway. I don't have experience with 
foreign connectivity so maybe this is the way it is done in the real world but 
I am thinking that perhaps the E1 site may not want or be able to change their 
compand-type, so can it be changed at the PSTN level between a-law and u-law 
locations?

Thanks,

Jason

From: Jason Granat
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:46 AM
To: mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>>
Subject: PSTN Call Distortion Between T1/E1

Perhaps this is something simple that I am overlooking but I have the generic 
setup running in my home lab with 3 gateways and one PSTN router. 2 of the 
gateways are T1 and one is E1. The PSTN router is also running CME with a 7960 
to simulate PSTN destinations. Calls from any site to the PSTN phone are fine. 
Calls between T1 sites are fine. Calls between T1 and E1 sites are distorted, 
like the gain is way too high. I tried playing with the gain on the voice-port 
but no luck. I'm not finding much online or in Cisco docs. Any suggestions?

Thanks,

Jason




http://slash128.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>



--
Regards,

Otto Sanchez
CCIE #25592 (Voice)
Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN Call Distortion Between T1/E1

[Jason Granat]

So I've got this partially figured out. It had to do with the compand-type. E1 
was a-law and T1 was u-law. I set the E1 side for u-law and it sounds correct 
now.

The final thing I am trying to figure out is how to 'trans-compand' (if that is 
the correct term) on the PSTN gateway. As it sits I had to change the 
compand-type between the PSTN and E1 gateway. I don't have experience with 
foreign connectivity so maybe this is the way it is done in the real world but 
I am thinking that perhaps the E1 site may not want or be able to change their 
compand-type, so can it be changed at the PSTN level between a-law and u-law 
locations?

Thanks,

Jason

From: Jason Granat
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:46 AM
To: 
Subject: PSTN Call Distortion Between T1/E1

Perhaps this is something simple that I am overlooking but I have the generic 
setup running in my home lab with 3 gateways and one PSTN router. 2 of the 
gateways are T1 and one is E1. The PSTN router is also running CME with a 7960 
to simulate PSTN destinations. Calls from any site to the PSTN phone are fine. 
Calls between T1 sites are fine. Calls between T1 and E1 sites are distorted, 
like the gain is way too high. I tried playing with the gain on the voice-port 
but no luck. I'm not finding much online or in Cisco docs. Any suggestions?

Thanks,

Jason




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN Call Distortion Between T1/E1

[Jason Granat]

I've come across a single post from another individual having the same issue 
from early 2009 but no responses. I've also come across some hints at PCM type, 
but not finding the answer.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jason Granat
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:54 AM
To: Jeff Price (jeffpric); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN Call Distortion Between T1/E1

Nope. I have all hardware here in my home lab. No VPN's.

From: Jeff Price (jeffpric) [mailto:jeffp...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:48 AM
To: Jason Granat; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN Call Distortion Between T1/E1

Are you by any chance running a VPN from routers to PSTN?  I've noticed this 
causes distortion some times.

Jeff

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jason Granat
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:46 AM
To: 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN Call Distortion Between T1/E1

Perhaps this is something simple that I am overlooking but I have the generic 
setup running in my home lab with 3 gateways and one PSTN router. 2 of the 
gateways are T1 and one is E1. The PSTN router is also running CME with a 7960 
to simulate PSTN destinations. Calls from any site to the PSTN phone are fine. 
Calls between T1 sites are fine. Calls between T1 and E1 sites are distorted, 
like the gain is way too high. I tried playing with the gain on the voice-port 
but no luck. I'm not finding much online or in Cisco docs. Any suggestions?

Thanks,

Jason




http://slash128.com




http://slash128.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN Call Distortion Between T1/E1

[Jason Granat]

Nope. I have all hardware here in my home lab. No VPN's.

From: Jeff Price (jeffpric) [mailto:jeffp...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:48 AM
To: Jason Granat; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN Call Distortion Between T1/E1

Are you by any chance running a VPN from routers to PSTN?  I've noticed this 
causes distortion some times.

Jeff

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jason Granat
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:46 AM
To: 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN Call Distortion Between T1/E1

Perhaps this is something simple that I am overlooking but I have the generic 
setup running in my home lab with 3 gateways and one PSTN router. 2 of the 
gateways are T1 and one is E1. The PSTN router is also running CME with a 7960 
to simulate PSTN destinations. Calls from any site to the PSTN phone are fine. 
Calls between T1 sites are fine. Calls between T1 and E1 sites are distorted, 
like the gain is way too high. I tried playing with the gain on the voice-port 
but no luck. I'm not finding much online or in Cisco docs. Any suggestions?

Thanks,

Jason




http://slash128.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN Call Distortion Between T1/E1

[Jason Granat]

Perhaps this is something simple that I am overlooking but I have the generic 
setup running in my home lab with 3 gateways and one PSTN router. 2 of the 
gateways are T1 and one is E1. The PSTN router is also running CME with a 7960 
to simulate PSTN destinations. Calls from any site to the PSTN phone are fine. 
Calls between T1 sites are fine. Calls between T1 and E1 sites are distorted, 
like the gain is way too high. I tried playing with the gain on the voice-port 
but no luck. I'm not finding much online or in Cisco docs. Any suggestions?

Thanks,

Jason




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Lab RTP

[Jason Granat]

For trips to RTP this is my route:

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&source=s_d&saddr=raleigh+durham+airport&daddr=200+airgate+drive+to:151+Airgate+Drive&hl=en&geocode=FdtxIwId08VN-ynR17D5-fCsiTG0J5ZfzuldQg%3BFf0_IwIdAGNN-yntwpfhtfGsiTFDMKfykWexYg%3B&mra=ls&sll=35.870335,-78.801905&sspn=0.02796,0.066047&ie=UTF8&z=15

Raleigh Durham Airport with a nice Hyatt and Chophouse across the street
Hyatt http://raleighrdu.place.hyatt.com/hyatt/hotels/place/index.jsp
Capital City Chop House: http://chophousesofnc.com/ChopHouse/index.htm

Just sayin, if you like steak... :)

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ron Cannella
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 7:00 AM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Lab RTP

I sat for the voice lab yesterday in RTP.

They served a delicious roasted pork with mushroom gray and steamed vegetable 
medley, a baked potato with all the 'fixins'. To finish it off, a double tiered 
chocolate on chocolate cake that was to die for. Served with a choice of 
refreshing spring water, juice or soda. It was an awesome meal but a little far 
from the house, and bloody expensive.

All kidding aside, it was a straight forward test. With enough lab time to get 
my dial plan design/speed skills down, very passable at this point. I think it 
is in my best interest to buckle down and take it again soon, before it 
"matures".

--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety 
deserve neither liberty nor safety."  -Ben Franklin




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Simulating IOS CUCME ON Dynamips / Dynagen

[Jason Granat]

Hi Wael,

I am not sure if you can actually get CME fully running with phones in
DynaMIPS, but you can have external devices communicate with the
virtual router. Are you using GNS3? It is a GUI frontend for DynaMIPS.
In the list of network devices you should have a 'cloud' object. In
the properties for the cloud object you can select your PCs physical
NIC. Then connect the cloud to your virtual router. Connect your PCs
NIC to a switch with the phones and they shouldbe able to talk to CME.

Like I said, not sure if they'll actually register, but I use this
method to test remote access VPN configs, call-home over Internet,
etc. Use a second NIC if you don't want your PC on the same subnet.
Or, if your NIC supports vlan tagging just create a different sub-if.

HTH,

Jason

Sent while mobile.

On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:15, "Wael Agina"  wrote:

> Dear All,
>
>   I have dynamips installed on my PC and I can console to the routers.
> Now i can issue all the CUCME config normally.
>
> However I need to register CIPC / Softphone to specific router
> instance on dynamips.
>
> I can telnet to specific router using the port assigned to it, but
> how to let softphone access it using an IP ?
>
> I hope someone has tried this and have an answer.
>
> Regards,
> Wael Agina
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed the CCIE Voice Lab

[Jason Granat]

As long as they were not in the priority queue :)

From: Michael Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 7:27 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed the CCIE Voice Lab

dude, I had all kinds of things that i was queueing up to say to you (and none 
of them were nice with how flippant you were being about passing the exam), but 
that was f&$#ing funny!!!
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Jason Granat 
mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:
It was actually pretty easy to pass the lab on the first try. If you have been 
to the San Jose campus you know what I mean. If you are traveling West on 
Tasman you have to pass the lab and flip a u-turn at Champion to get to the 
Bldg C driveway where the lab is :-)

Unfortunately, I failed my first attempt at the exam...




http://slash128.com<http://slash128.com/>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>





http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed the CCIE Voice Lab

[Jason Granat]

No, you have it backwards. I failed so you will pass :)

From: jgar...@gmail.com [mailto:jgar...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Garvas
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 7:55 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed the CCIE Voice Lab

Great.

Now if I book it in San Jose I know I won't pass it.

Its like you jinxed me.

-jeff

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Jason Granat 
mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:
It was actually pretty easy to pass the lab on the first try. If you have been 
to the San Jose campus you know what I mean. If you are traveling West on 
Tasman you have to pass the lab and flip a u-turn at Champion to get to the 
Bldg C driveway where the lab is :-)

Unfortunately, I failed my first attempt at the exam...




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>





http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed the CCIE Voice Lab

[Jason Granat]

Hi Wael,

I don't know if you caught it but it was a joke. I passed the lab location 
while I was driving :) but failed the test.

This was my first attempt. I would say that the IPExpert material definitely 
covers all the bases. My downfall was that I did not practice my speed. The 
sheer amount of things to configure left me with no time. I got hung up in dial 
plan and wasted a bunch of time. I took mental notes and wrote as much down as 
I could remember and have simulated in my home lab. I am still having details 
come back to me as I practice. I am now practicing speed and variation by 
peppering in some IPE scenarios...

Don't be afraid, it's just a test! A very expensive test, but still, only a 
test :)

Good luck!

Jason


From: Wael Agina [mailto:waelag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 9:57 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed the CCIE Voice Lab

Congratulations MAN :)


On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Jason Granat 
mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:
It was actually pretty easy to pass the lab on the first try. If you have been 
to the San Jose campus you know what I mean. If you are traveling West on 
Tasman you have to pass the lab and flip a u-turn at Champion to get to the 
Bldg C driveway where the lab is :-)

Unfortunately, I failed my first attempt at the exam...




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>



--

Thanks and Best Regards,
Wael Agina




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed the CCIE Voice Lab

[Jason Granat]

It was actually pretty easy to pass the lab on the first try. If you have been 
to the San Jose campus you know what I mean. If you are traveling West on 
Tasman you have to pass the lab and flip a u-turn at Champion to get to the 
Bldg C driveway where the lab is :-)

Unfortunately, I failed my first attempt at the exam...




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] RTP Voice Lab

[Jason Granat]

What's up with RTP? I've seen the chatter over the last few months but I hoped 
something would be resolved by this time. I know it's a stupid reason, based on 
what we're after, but tho SJ has better choices for lunch, I've really gotten 
hooked on Capital City Chop House :)




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP OTQ

[Jason Granat]

Hey, curious to know if anyone has seen support yet for VRF-Aware MGCP... There 
was some chatter about it happening in 12.4(22)T/12.2(24)T but nothing in the 
release notes...

Thanks,

Jason




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] existing VM Ware CLI

[Jason Granat]

NP, glad to help :)

From: iptuser55 [mailto:iptuse...@hotmail.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 12:40 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: ccie voice
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] existing VM Ware CLI

Jason


thanks - that worked

From: j...@slash128.com
To: iptuse...@hotmail.co.uk
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 12:24:28 -0800
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] existing VM Ware CLI
What do you mean by 'get back out'? To exit the CLI session within the CUCM 
shell you just type 'exit'. To switch focus from the console window back to the 
host then press +.


Sent while mobile.

On Feb 7, 2010, at 12:20, "iptuser55" 
mailto:iptuse...@hotmail.co.uk>> wrote:
Jason


Thanks

I start the VM machine up and the CUCM boots, I then log in to CUCM CLI using 
the Console option  - how do I get back out the VM machine, CUCM

thanks

From: j...@slash128.com<mailto:j...@slash128.com>
To: iptuse...@hotmail.co.uk<mailto:iptuse...@hotmail.co.uk>
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 12:15:44 -0800
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] existing VM Ware CLI
I'm not sure I understand the question, but perhaps you are trying to break out 
of the VM console window? Try +.

If this isn't what you mean please help me understand.

Jason

Sent while mobile.

On Feb 7, 2010, at 11:31, "iptuser55" 
mailto:iptuse...@hotmail.co.uk>> wrote:
I`ve now set up my server with VM ware and installed CUCM plus others. I can 
access the CLI of the CUCM sevrer - how do I exit the CLI so to get back to the 
VM Serer, Client

thanks


Do you want a Hotmail account? Sign-up now - 
Free<http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/19780/direct/01/>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>




http://slash128.com


Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us 
now<http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/>




http://slash128.com


Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us 
now<http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/>




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] existing VM Ware CLI

[Jason Granat]

What do you mean by 'get back out'? To exit the CLI session within the CUCM 
shell you just type 'exit'. To switch focus from the console window back to the 
host then press +.


Sent while mobile.

On Feb 7, 2010, at 12:20, "iptuser55" 
mailto:iptuse...@hotmail.co.uk>> wrote:

Jason


Thanks

I start the VM machine up and the CUCM boots, I then log in to CUCM CLI using 
the Console option  - how do I get back out the VM machine, CUCM

thanks

From:  j...@slash128.com
To:  
iptuse...@hotmail.co.uk
CC:  
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 12:15:44 -0800
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] existing VM Ware CLI

I'm not sure I understand the question, but perhaps you are trying to break out 
of the VM console window? Try +.

If this isn't what you mean please help me understand.

Jason

Sent while mobile.

On Feb 7, 2010, at 11:31, "iptuser55" 
<iptuse...@hotmail.co.uk>
 wrote:

I`ve now set up my server with VM ware and installed CUCM plus others. I can 
access the CLI of the CUCM sevrer - how do I exit the CLI so to get back to the 
VM Serer, Client

thanks


Do you want a Hotmail account? Sign-up now - 
Free
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
  
www.ipexpert.com




http://slash128.com


Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us 
now




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] existing VM Ware CLI

[Jason Granat]

I'm not sure I understand the question, but perhaps you are trying to break out 
of the VM console window? Try +.

If this isn't what you mean please help me understand.

Jason

Sent while mobile.

On Feb 7, 2010, at 11:31, "iptuser55" 
mailto:iptuse...@hotmail.co.uk>> wrote:

I`ve now set up my server with VM ware and installed CUCM plus others. I can 
access the CLI of the CUCM sevrer - how do I exit the CLI so to get back to the 
VM Serer, Client

thanks


Do you want a Hotmail account? Sign-up now - 
Free
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Callmanager install on esx problem

[Jason Granat]

I've had this happen right after a fresh install. I think it may still
be doing something in the background because after a while, 30 min or
so, I am able to log in via cli.

Sent while mobile.

On Feb 6, 2010, at 7:54, "Scott ODonnell" 
wrote:

> I running into an issue where my pub install is succesful but can't
> log into the console with the admin password I set during install.
>
> I've even run pwrecovery and reset the password but it isn't working.
>
> Anybody else see this happening?
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.0 DHCP Server

[Jason Granat]

If it's in the same subnet run Wireshark on the VM host server using that 
interface and watch for DHCP.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jason Granat
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 11:09 AM
To: wilson.sam...@usc-bt.com; 2xcci...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.0 DHCP Server

Is it in the same subnet as the DHCP clients (phones)? If it is in a different 
subnet do you have ip helper-address with the CUCM IP configured on the 
clients' default-gateway interface?

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
wilson.sam...@usc-bt.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 10:53 AM
To: 2xcci...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.0 DHCP Server

Hi All,

I know this should be incredibly easy, however for some reason my brain is not 
helping with me on this.

I have installed a CUCM 7.1 Pub (no Sub) and want to make it a DHCP Server (as 
normally required by most of the labs), even after disabling the CSA, my phones 
are not taking any IP Address from the CUCM DHCP Server.
Btw, the CUCM is on a VMWare VM and has a bridged network card with the host. I 
can ping everything  and everything is fine if I use my ASA as the DHCP.

However the moment I use the CUCM DHCP Server , the phones cant get IP Address 
from it.

Anything I have been ignoring?

Regards
Wilson Samuel




http://slash128.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.0 DHCP Server

[Jason Granat]

Is it in the same subnet as the DHCP clients (phones)? If it is in a different 
subnet do you have ip helper-address with the CUCM IP configured on the 
clients' default-gateway interface?

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
wilson.sam...@usc-bt.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 10:53 AM
To: 2xcci...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.0 DHCP Server

Hi All,

I know this should be incredibly easy, however for some reason my brain is not 
helping with me on this.

I have installed a CUCM 7.1 Pub (no Sub) and want to make it a DHCP Server (as 
normally required by most of the labs), even after disabling the CSA, my phones 
are not taking any IP Address from the CUCM DHCP Server.
Btw, the CUCM is on a VMWare VM and has a bridged network card with the host. I 
can ping everything  and everything is fine if I use my ASA as the DHCP.

However the moment I use the CUCM DHCP Server , the phones cant get IP Address 
from it.

Anything I have been ignoring?

Regards
Wilson Samuel




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-ESW-16 PoE 7945 phone

[Jason Granat]

FYI: here's the data sheet on that module:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps259/product_data_sheet09186a00801aca3e.html

Here's the note specific to the power source:

• NM-16ESW-PWR and NMD-36ESW-PWR: The 16- and 36-port Ethernet switch modules 
with power daughter cards support 48V inline power of IP telephones when either 
purchased with an external power chassis or when used with an internal power 
supply. This combination of components enables IP phones to be plugged into any 
EtherSwitch module port. Also, the integrated Cisco power over ethernet for the 
10/100BaseTX autosensing ports provides DC power to devices that can accept 
power over traditional UTP cabling (such as the Cisco 7900 Family of IP 
phones). This allows a standard RJ-45 jack to be powered from this EtherSwitch 
module source rather than having a separate plug into an AC wall outlet. 
Delivery of -48V power must be made to the 16-port Ethernet switch. This 
daughter card is required for power over ethernet. An internal or external 
power supply is also required.


On Jan 30, 2010, at 1:38 PM, bontacommunications wrote:

I am running into an issue with bringing up a new 7945 in my lab rack - 2811 w/ 
NM-ESW-16 w/ PoE card

Has anyone successfully powered up a 7945 phone on a NM-ESW-16 w/PoE?

What did you do?



Thanks in Advance,
Chris


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com





http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-ESW-16 PoE 7945 phone

[Jason Granat]

Do you have a power source for the PoE? With that NM the PoE power source is 
separate from the card. I have mine in a 3745 router configured as my PSTN 
router. I had to add an internal power supply to the router to actual power up 
the PoE feature on the card. There are also external power options for that 
card. Do a 'show power inline' and make sure you have a power source:

pstn#sh power inline
PowerSupply   SlotNum.   Maximum   Allocated   Status
---      ---   -   --
INT-PS   0   360.000 6.300 PS1 GOOD   PS2 ABSENT
EXT-PS   4 0.000 0.000 PS1 ABSENT   PS2 ABSENT
Interface   Config   DevicePoweredPowerAllocated
-   --   -------
Fa4/0   auto CiscoOn 6.300 Watts
Fa4/1   auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
Fa4/2   auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
Fa4/3   auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
Fa4/4   auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
Fa4/5   auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
Fa4/6   auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
Fa4/7   auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
Fa4/8   auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
Fa4/9   auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
Fa4/10  auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
Fa4/11  auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
Fa4/12  auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
Fa4/13  auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
Fa4/14  auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
Fa4/15  auto Unknown  Off0.000 Watts
pstn#


On Jan 30, 2010, at 1:38 PM, bontacommunications wrote:

> I am running into an issue with bringing up a new 7945 in my lab rack - 2811 
> w/ NM-ESW-16 w/ PoE card
>
> Has anyone successfully powered up a 7945 phone on a NM-ESW-16 w/PoE?
>
> What did you do?
>
>
>
> Thanks in Advance,
> Chris
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert¹s Workbooks ­ ALL Completed and Shipping

[Jason Granat]

Are these still posting today? Just curious, as I hadn’t seen them in my 
downloads yet.

Thanks!

From: Wayne Lawson [mailto:groupst...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:38 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: Amy Ryan; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert¹s Workbooks ­ ALL Completed and 
Shipping

Jason - yes!!! (I know - about time, eyh!?! ;-)
Regards,

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder & President - IPexpert
Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com<mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com>
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 101
Live Assistance, Please visit: 
www.ipexpert.com/chat<http://www.ipexpert.com/chat>
eFax: +1.810.454.0130

::Message sent from iPhone::

IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (R&S, 
Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service 
Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United States, 
Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at 
www.ipexpert.com/communities<http://www.ipexpert.com/communities> and our 
public website at www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>.

On Jan 23, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Jason Granat 
mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:
This is great news. Thank you! Will the complete workbooks be available for 
download on 1/29 as well?


On Jan 23, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Amy Ryan wrote:


All,

Check out the latest Blog by Wayne Lawson.  This is great news that many of you 
have been waiting for!

Best Regards,
Amy

IPexpert’s Workbooks – ALL Completed and Shipping 
<http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/01/23/ipexperts-workbooks-all-completed-and-shipping/<http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/01/23/ipexperts-workbooks-all-completed-and-shipping/>>

I’ve got great news to all of our aspiring CCIE candidates out there!  We’re 
pleased to announce that this coming Friday (the 29th) ALL of our CCIE 
workbooks will be shipping (most are available now, with just a few of them 
being wrapped up and completed!).  It’s been a long and challenging journey 
for us (due to all of the changes recently made on 3 of the CCIE Labs!), but 
our workbooks are finally overhauled and ready to ship!  I have to say, these 
are the most incredible technical products we’ve ever released!  Our team has 
worked nights, weekends and holidays – over the past year+ to overhaul every 
aspect of these workbooks, including the technical content, diagrams, detailed 
solutions and format – these are DEFINITELY second-to-none in quality and 
content!  I’m sure you’ll all agree – and I’m sure that our industry-standard 
workbooks will continue to receive amazing reviews when they’re in your hands.  
I’m quite optimistic that we’ll continue to add to the world’s largest list of 
CCIEs! <http://www.ipexpert.com/company/success>  (Just count them! ;-)  You’ll 
be able to tell (by reading my descriptions below) how excited I am about these 
workbooks!  Here’s a summary of what we’ve done – and will have shipping on 
Friday (Note: all existing workbook & Blended Learning Solution customers will 
have these workbooks added to your member’s area automatically!):

CCIE Routing & Switching 4.0 
<http://www.ipexpert.com/Cisco/CCIE/Routing-and-Switching-Lab-Portfolio>

 *   Volume 1: 
<http://www.ipexpert.com/Cisco/CCIE/Routing-and-Switching/Workbook/Technology-Focused-RandS-Lab-Workbook>
  Overhauled to include 4.0 topics / technology-focused lab scenarios w/ a 
Detailed Solution Guide.  There are 34 chapters (labs) covering all topics 
you’ll see on the new blueprint.  The Detailed Solution Guide walks you through 
the lab scenarios providing an in-depth overview of what’s happening and why 
you’re doing what’s asked.
 *   Volume 2: 
<http://www.ipexpert.com/Cisco/CCIE/Routing-and-Switching/Workbook/RandS-Mock-Lab-Workbook-Volume-2>
  This lab workbook has been overhauled to match the new 4.0 blueprint.  It’s a 
bridge between Volume 1 and Volume 3 – consisting of 20 8-hour multiprotocol 
labs (starting easier and getting progressively harder!).  There is an 
accompanying Detailed Solution Guide that walks you through each task – 
providing a thorough overview of how to configure each task.
 *   Volume 3: 
<http://www.ipexpert.com/Cisco/CCIE/Routing-and-Switching/Workbook/RandS-Mock-Lab-Workbook-Volume-3>
  This workbook is AMAZING!  Our clients who have been using this have provided 
awesome feedback!  They’re telling us that this workbook is “spot on” when it 
comes to the 4.0 lab.  Our clients are breezing through the OEQ and 
Troubleshooting sections (on the current 4.0 lab!).  This workbook consists of 
10 labs that are formatted to resemble the real and current 4.0 R&S lab.  
You’ll start out with OEQ and then move on to 10 Troubleshooting tickets – then 
the configuration section.  These are the real deal!  The Detailed Solution 
Guide is EXTREMELY thorough – and provides you with a wealth

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] OT: eReader for Cisco PDFs?

[Jason Granat]

To your side note, the hard copies usually come with PDFs on a CD/DVD. Curious 
if you can copy those to the Kindle?

-Original Message-
From: Peter Slow [mailto:peter.s...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 9:32 AM
To: Tanner Ezell
Cc: Jason Granat; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] OT: eReader for Cisco PDFs?

Actually, I bought a kindle DX SPECIFICALLY to read the SRND in pdf
format. I also used smoethign called mobipocket creator to suck the
html version of the SRND into  e-book format.
doing that destroys the graphics, but on the DX, which has a native
PDF reader, the SRND is more than readable. viewing it in PDF format,
the graphics are outstanding and more than legible. (the conversion to
ebook format is what wrecks them.) the only problem is the table of
contents doesnt work. all in all, it was damn expensive, but 500 bucks
to allow me to actually read all the SRNDs and stuff was more than
worth it when i knew EXACTLY what chapter i needed to look at to
answer a question on my lab =)

Using my kindle allowed me to turn the SRND into, well bathroom
reading. It was a worthy purchase.

As a sidnote, I'm pissed off because it seems liek the whole damn
cisco press library is available in the kindle store, but i already
OWN all the books i want. I would LOVE to be able to take my library
on site with me!

-Peter

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Tanner Ezell  wrote:
> There's always the iPad... :)
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Jason Granat  wrote:
>>
>> The PDFs direct from CCO format correctly on my iPhone, just small screen.
>> Maybe the iPad when it ships if you can wait two months?
>>
>> Sent while mobile.
>> On Jan 28, 2010, at 19:24, "Jeff Garvas"  wrote:
>>
>> I've heard that the network diagrams look horrible on the kindle.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Jeff Spronk (jespronk)
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyone out there using an eReader to read Cisco PDFs?  I had a friend
>>> load up the CUCM 7 SRND on his kindle.  The text looked fine, but the tables
>>> and images were garbled.  I'd like to get my hands on a Nook and try it out
>>> but haven't had a chance yet.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --Jeff
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> 
>>
>> http://slash128.com
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Tanner Ezell
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Initialwizzard gives an option only for Callmanager in stead Callmanager Express integration

[Jason Granat]

ick software lice... does that require a special comb and shampoo? :-)

Sent while mobile.

On Jan 29, 2010, at 7:13, "Arun Kumar" 
mailto:arunv...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Check what .pkg you are running is it for CUCM or CUCME

show software lice on cue

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:33 PM, akash patel 
<akashapa...@yahoo.com>
 wrote:
I took CUE offline.  restore factory default.

 I had configured CME for CUE intgration as per guide (cisco and ipexpert)


 *   ntp server
 *   service-module IP/default gateway/default route,
 *   SIP dialpeeer
 *   configure VM pilot under voice register globa & tele service,
 *   ephone-dn and voice register-dn with call-forward busy/noanswer to pilot,
 *   configure web admin under telephny,
 *   configure ip http server, path flash:/gui


Can please someone guide me?

Thank you

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] OT: eReader for Cisco PDFs?

[Jason Granat]

The PDFs direct from CCO format correctly on my iPhone, just small screen. 
Maybe the iPad when it ships if you can wait two months?

Sent while mobile.

On Jan 28, 2010, at 19:24, "Jeff Garvas" mailto:j...@cia.net>> 
wrote:

I've heard that the network diagrams look horrible on the kindle.

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Jeff Spronk (jespronk) 
<jespr...@cisco.com> 
wrote:
Anyone out there using an eReader to read Cisco PDFs?  I had a friend load up 
the CUCM 7 SRND on his kindle.  The text looked fine, but the tables and images 
were garbled.  I’d like to get my hands on a Nook and try it out but haven’t 
had a chance yet.

Thanks,

--Jeff

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert¹s Workbooks ­ ALL Completed and Shipping

[Jason Granat]

Sweet :-) thx!!!

Sent while mobile.

On Jan 23, 2010, at 12:37, "Wayne Lawson" 
mailto:groupst...@ipexpert.com>> wrote:

Jason - yes!!! (I know - about time, eyh!?! ;-)

Regards,

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder & President - IPexpert
Mailto: <mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com> <mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com> 
wlaw...@ipexpert.com<mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com>
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 101
Live Assistance, Please visit: <http://www.ipexpert.com/chat> 
<http://www.ipexpert.com/chat> 
www.ipexpert.com/chat<http://www.ipexpert.com/chat>
eFax: +1.810.454.0130

::Message sent from iPhone::

IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (R&S, 
Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service 
Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United States, 
Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at 
<http://www.ipexpert.com/communities> 
www.ipexpert.com/communities<http://www.ipexpert.com/communities> and our 
public website at <http://www.ipexpert.com> 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>.

On Jan 23, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Jason Granat 
<<mailto:j...@slash128.com>j...@slash128.com<mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:

This is great news. Thank you! Will the complete workbooks be available for 
download on 1/29 as well?


On Jan 23, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Amy Ryan wrote:

All,

Check out the latest Blog by Wayne Lawson.  This is great news that many of you 
have been waiting for!

Best Regards,
Amy

IPexpert’s Workbooks – ALL Completed and Shipping 
<http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/01/23/ipexperts-workbooks-all-completed-and-shipping/><http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/01/23/ipexperts-workbooks-all-completed-and-shipping/>blog.ipexpert.com/2010/01/23/ipexperts-workbooks-all-completed-and-shipping/<http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/01/23/ipexperts-workbooks-all-completed-and-shipping/>>

I’ve got great news to all of our aspiring CCIE candidates out there!  We’re 
pleased to announce that this coming Friday (the 29th) ALL of our CCIE 
workbooks will be shipping (most are available now, with just a few of them 
being wrapped up and completed!).  It’s been a long and challenging journey 
for us (due to all of the changes recently made on 3 of the CCIE Labs!), but 
our workbooks are finally overhauled and ready to ship!  I have to say, these 
are the most incredible technical products we’ve ever released!  Our team has 
worked nights, weekends and holidays – over the past year+ to overhaul every 
aspect of these workbooks, including the technical content, diagrams, detailed 
solutions and format – these are DEFINITELY second-to-none in quality and 
content!  I’m sure you’ll all agree – and I’m sure that our industry-standard 
workbooks will continue to receive amazing reviews when they’re in your hands.  
I’m quite optimistic that we’ll continue to add to the world’s largest list of 
CCIEs! 
<<http://www.ipexpert.com/company/success><http://www.ipexpert.com/company/success>http://www.ipexpert.com/company/success>
  (Just count them! ;-)  You’ll be able to tell (by reading my descriptions 
below) how excited I am about these workbooks!  Here’s a summary of what we’ve 
done – and will have shipping on Friday (Note: all existing workbook & Blended 
Learning Solution customers will have these workbooks added to your member’s 
area automatically!):

CCIE Routing & Switching 4.0 
<<http://www.ipexpert.com/Cisco/CCIE/Routing-and-Switching-Lab-Portfolio><http://www.ipexpert.com/Cisco/CCIE/Routing-and-Switching-Lab-Portfolio>http://www.ipexpert.com/Cisco/CCIE/Routing-and-Switching-Lab-Portfolio>

 *   Volume 1: 
<<http://www.ipexpert.com/Cisco/CCIE/Routing-and-Switching/Workbook/Technology-Focused-RandS-Lab-Workbook><http://www.ipexpert.com/Cisco/CCIE/Routing-and-Switching/Workbook/Technology-Focused-RandS-Lab-Workbook>http://www.ipexpert.com/Cisco/CCIE/Routing-and-Switching/Workbook/Technology-Focused-RandS-Lab-Workbook>
  Overhauled to include 4.0 topics / technology-focused lab scenarios w/ a 
Detailed Solution Guide.  There are 34 chapters (labs) covering all topics 
you’ll see on the new blueprint.  The Detailed Solution Guide walks you through 
the lab scenarios providing an in-depth overview of what’s happening and why 
you’re doing what’s asked.
 *   Volume 2: 
<<http://www.ipexpert.com/Cisco/CCIE/Routing-and-Switching/Workbook/RandS-Mock-Lab-Workbook-Volume-2><http://www.ipexpert.com/Cisco/CCIE/Routing-and-Switching/Workbook/RandS-Mock-Lab-Workbook-Volume-2>http://www.ipexpert.com/Cisco/CCIE/Routing-and-Switching/Workbook/RandS-Mock-Lab-Workbook-Volume-2>
  This lab workbook has been overhauled to match the new 4.0 blueprint.  It’s a 
bridge between Volume 1 and Volume 3 – consisting of 20 8-hour multiprotocol 
labs

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert¹s Workbooks ­ AL L Completed and Shipping

[Jason Granat]

This is great news. Thank you! Will the complete workbooks be available for 
download on 1/29 as well?


On Jan 23, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Amy Ryan wrote:

All,

Check out the latest Blog by Wayne Lawson.  This is great news that many of you 
have been waiting for!

Best Regards,
Amy

IPexpert’s Workbooks – ALL Completed and Shipping 
blog.ipexpert.com/2010/01/23/ipexperts-workbooks-all-completed-and-shipping/>

I’ve got great news to all of our aspiring CCIE candidates out there!  We’re 
pleased to announce that this coming Friday (the 29th) ALL of our CCIE 
workbooks will be shipping (most are available now, with just a few of them 
being wrapped up and completed!).  It’s been a long and challenging journey 
for us (due to all of the changes recently made on 3 of the CCIE Labs!), but 
our workbooks are finally overhauled and ready to ship!  I have to say, these 
are the most incredible technical products we’ve ever released!  Our team has 
worked nights, weekends and holidays – over the past year+ to overhaul every 
aspect of these workbooks, including the technical content, diagrams, detailed 
solutions and format – these are DEFINITELY second-to-none in quality and 
content!  I’m sure you’ll all agree – and I’m sure that our industry-standard 
workbooks will continue to receive amazing reviews when they’re in your hands.  
I’m quite optimistic that we’ll continue to add to the world’s largest list of 
CCIEs!   (Just count them! ;-)  You’ll 
be able to tell (by reading my descriptions below) how excited I am about these 
workbooks!  Here’s a summary of what we’ve done – and will have shipping on 
Friday (Note: all existing workbook & Blended Learning Solution customers will 
have these workbooks added to your member’s area automatically!):

CCIE Routing & Switching 4.0 


 *   Volume 1: 

  Overhauled to include 4.0 topics / technology-focused lab scenarios w/ a 
Detailed Solution Guide.  There are 34 chapters (labs) covering all topics 
you’ll see on the new blueprint.  The Detailed Solution Guide walks you through 
the lab scenarios providing an in-depth overview of what’s happening and why 
you’re doing what’s asked.
 *   Volume 2: 

  This lab workbook has been overhauled to match the new 4.0 blueprint.  It’s a 
bridge between Volume 1 and Volume 3 – consisting of 20 8-hour multiprotocol 
labs (starting easier and getting progressively harder!).  There is an 
accompanying Detailed Solution Guide that walks you through each task – 
providing a thorough overview of how to configure each task.
 *   Volume 3: 

  This workbook is AMAZING!  Our clients who have been using this have provided 
awesome feedback!  They’re telling us that this workbook is “spot on” when it 
comes to the 4.0 lab.  Our clients are breezing through the OEQ and 
Troubleshooting sections (on the current 4.0 lab!).  This workbook consists of 
10 labs that are formatted to resemble the real and current 4.0 R&S lab.  
You’ll start out with OEQ and then move on to 10 Troubleshooting tickets – then 
the configuration section.  These are the real deal!  The Detailed Solution 
Guide is EXTREMELY thorough – and provides you with a wealth of information – 
so you’re able to fully understand these lab scenarios and our solutions!  Joe 
 , Tyson 
  and Marko 
  (industry-recognized experts!) have put 
a wealth of time into this resource to ensure you’re ready for the new 4.0 lab 
exam!

CCIE Voice 3.0  

 *   Volume 1 

  is now shipping and is a protocol-focused lab workbook (with 19 chapters / 
sections) covering all topics and technologies seen on the current blueprint 
(3.0).  This was just “tweaked” (after already being completely rewritten from 
scratch!) by the world’s most renowned CCIE Voice Instructor – Vik Malhi 
  – while he was completing the Volume 1 
Video Solutions 
 , so 
you’re sure to have an error-free workbook – with the latest and greatest 
topics.  This industry-leading workbook also includes an accompanying Detailed 
Solution Guide which walks you through all of the solutions.  It’s important to 
note that our CCIE Voice products have become the industry standard

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: CUPC No-Audio Question

[Jason Granat]

Thanks, I'll give that a shot!

From: james arnold [mailto:avsfan...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:14 AM
To: Jason Granat; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: CUPC No-Audio Question

You have to upgrade the CUPC to the latest...they came out with a patch for it. 
 I had the same issue and upgraded the CUPC and it started working as normal.

James

From: j...@slash128.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:05:24 -0800
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: CUPC No-Audio Question
Forgot to reply all.

Sent while mobile.

Begin forwarded message:
From: Jason Granat mailto:j...@slash128.com>>
Date: January 22, 2010 9:48:49 PST
To: Nico Kotze mailto:nico.ko...@s2s.ltd.uk>>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC No-Audio Question
This is the same issue I posted about a few days ago. I am running on Mac OS X 
Snow Leopard as well. Calls connect but no audio.

Sent while mobile.

On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:13, "Nico Kotze" 
mailto:nico.ko...@s2s.ltd.uk>> wrote:
Which OS (MAC or Windows)?

I have been having the same issue on MAC.

Everything work, even dial and answer, can also see packets sent and received 
but no audio.

I found the issue to be the MAC OS (snow Leopard), if you use normal Leopard 
everything work.

Many Thanks,
Nico

s2s company email disclaimer: 
http://www.s2s.ltd.uk/datasheets/email_disclaimer.pdf
s2s company registration number : 3952958
s2s VAT registration number : GB763132055
Business premises   : Ground Floor, Overline House, Crawley, West 
Sussex, RH10 1JA
Registered address  : Denton Hall, Ilkley, West Yorkshire, LS29 0HH
Place of registration   : England




http://slash128.com

Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it 
now.<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390710/direct/01/>




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: CUPC No-Audio Question

[Jason Granat]

Forgot to reply all.

Sent while mobile.

Begin forwarded message:

From: Jason Granat mailto:j...@slash128.com>>
Date: January 22, 2010 9:48:49 PST
To: Nico Kotze mailto:nico.ko...@s2s.ltd.uk>>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC No-Audio Question

This is the same issue I posted about a few days ago. I am running on Mac OS X 
Snow Leopard as well. Calls connect but no audio.

Sent while mobile.

On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:13, "Nico Kotze" 
<<mailto:nico.ko...@s2s.ltd.uk>nico.ko...@s2s.ltd.uk<mailto:nico.ko...@s2s.ltd.uk>>
 wrote:

Which OS (MAC or Windows)?

I have been having the same issue on MAC.

Everything work, even dial and answer, can also see packets sent and received 
but no audio.

I found the issue to be the MAC OS (snow Leopard), if you use normal Leopard 
everything work.

Many Thanks,
Nico


s2s company email disclaimer: 
<http://www.s2s.ltd.uk/datasheets/email_disclaimer.pdf> 
<http://www.s2s.ltd.uk/datasheets/email_disclaimer.pdf> 
http://www.s2s.ltd.uk/datasheets/email_disclaimer.pdf
s2s company registration number : 3952958
s2s VAT registration number : GB763132055
Business premises   : Ground Floor, Overline House, Crawley, West 
Sussex, RH10 1JA
Registered address  : Denton Hall, Ilkley, West Yorkshire, LS29 0HH
Place of registration   : England





http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC No-Audio Question

[Jason Granat]

I sent this with a screenshot attached and it got flagged for mod
approval so I am resending without screenshot. Any ideas?

Sent while mobile.

On Jan 16, 2010, at 20:13, "Jason Granat"  wrote:

> I'm troubleshooting a CUPC issue. Still working on it but figured
> I'd fire off an email to see if anyone has run into this. CUPC
> registers just fine. Presence is working, desk phone control works,
> IM works. All checks in the CUPS troubleshooter come back green.
> When I make a call to/from CUPC there is no audio. I can use desk
> phone control to make the same call and it works. I know there could
> be many reasons for this and like I said I am still troubleshooting,
> but the thing that's puzzling is when I check user status in CUPS it
> shows IM capabilities but not audio or video. See the screen shot
> below. It has been working in the past...
>
> 



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 47, Issue 70

[Jason Granat]

Hard-coding ensures they don't mis-negotiate at half-duplex. Half-
duplex or mis-matched duplex is awful for voice, and for data too.
Half-duplex only one side can transmit at a time. Mis-matched and the
full side will xmit/rcv simultaneously, while the half side will get
errors. Makes voice sound less than stellar :-)

Case in point for data was a customer ticket with a synchronous 30M
Internet feed handed off on a 100M copper port. Customer was noticing
very slow uploads. Speed tests were showing ~30M down but < 1M up.
Looking at interfaces we found the link to the ISP had negotiated
correct port speed of 100M but incorrect duplex of half (probably
because ISP was hard set to full, so no negotiation and customer
equipment fell back to half). After changing duplex to full on
customer side upload speed jumped to ~30M. 29M difference, just due to
duplex mis-match.

Sent while mobile.

On Jan 17, 2010, at 9:48, "Alex Hannah"  wrote:

> Matthew,
>
> Depends on what is connected to the other end of the trunk and what
> that devices capabilities are.  Do a show cdp neigh details look at
> the remote sides info,  also look at the routers fa or gig port
> config.  I personally leave it to auto negot, but I know a lot of
> peeps who hard code it.  Do a term mon on the switch and see if you
> are getting speed/duplex mismatches.
>
> Sean,
>
> Your config outbound in Cucm is where you need to look,  goto
> serviceabilty page and run DNA.  Run it from the phones tab NOT the
> analizer and fill in the calling/called num and the CSS.  On the
> gateway you can do a sh isdn stat, and debug mgcp packet.  Make sure
> your discarding predot and your called party xforms are setting the
> type/plan correctly.
>
> HTH
>
> Alex
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 17, 2010, at 12:00 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
> wrote:
>
>> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>>   ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>   http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>   ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>   ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>  1. Trunk Port Configuration (Berry, Matthew J.)
>>  2. MGCP issue (sean hurricane)
>>
>>
>> ---
>> ---
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:22:00 -0600
>> From: "Berry, Matthew J." 
>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trunk Port Configuration
>> To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
>> Message-ID:
>>   <0d69df41cdb9bf4bb30c481d414a8be70ab9554...@usepx2pmxmbx04.corp.kroll.com
>>>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> In workbook 1, lab 1, we are told to configure a trunk port this way:
>>
>> Standard Catalyst 3750 Configuration for Trunk Port
>>
>> Vlan 10
>>
>> Name DATA
>>
>> State active
>>
>> Interface FastEthernet 1/0/2
>>
>> Switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>>
>> Switchport mode trunk
>>
>> Switchport trunk native vlan 10
>>
>> Speed 100
>>
>> Duplex full
>>
>> Is there a specific reason that you manually set the speed and
>> duplex instead of letting it negotiate automatically?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matthew Berry, Sr. Unified Communications Engineer, CCVP
>> Kroll Ontrack  |  9023 Columbine Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55347
>> 952 516 3748  |  Fax 952 516 3646  |  Mobile 952 221 2814|  
>> mjbe...@krollontrack.com
>> 
>> www.krollontrack.com
>>
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: 
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100117/3c873f93/attachment.html
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:40:14 -0500
>> From: sean hurricane 
>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP issue
>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Message-ID:
>>   <29604bef1001170840u6a8a519v19d3c1194a2bf...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> I am experiencing a problem with MGCP where i am not able to make
>> outbound
>> pstn calls, i will just get a re-order tone
>> and i dont see the call on the gateway... but when i call from the
>> PSTN
>> inbound i can see the call using debug isdn 931 but i does not ring
>> UCCM
>> .the gateway is registered in ccm and multi frame established..
>> this
>> leads me to believe the problem is in UCCM... i have checked all the
>> usuals.significant digit, inbound css and funny thing is my HQ
>> and BR2
>> router are registered to the same UCCM and working
>>
>>
>> *Router info*
>> **
>> *2811*
>> *ios: 2800nm-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-22.T2.bin*
>> **
>> **
>> *any thoughts? *
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attac

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Third times a charm and Strategy CCIE Voice 25842

[Jason Granat]

Careful... Your in-laws may be on this board ;-) haha

CONGRATS!!! Excellent write-up! Thank you!

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jason L. Hawkins
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:19 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Third times a charm and Strategy CCIE Voice 25842

Finally got my CCIE in Voice #25842.  I'd like to thank Vik and
IPExpert for all the help they've given me.  Vik is an excellent
instructor and IPExpert is a great training company.

Thank you!

Here's what I did to get my number.

First attempt was v2 in RTP on June 30.
I just wasn't ready and I tried to rush into an exam before the change.

Second attempt was v3 in San Jose on Dec 8th.
I was 100% more prepared this time but didn't get my flow started
until late and just choked.

Third attempt was v3 in San Jose on Jan 12th.
Just continued practicing and going over the things I knew I messed up on.

I used IPExpert exclusively.  For my first attempt I attended a v2
OWLE with Mark Snow about 4 weeks before the exam and I schedule a
week of back to back proctor labs sessions the week before.  The
training was very good but I just wasn't ready to pass.

My second attempt I attended a v3 OWLE with Vik Malhi about 4 weeks
before the exam.  Vik is an amazing instructor and goes way out of his
way to help out his students and to ensure they understand the
material.  I used my work lab to continue practicing before the exam.

My third attempt I didn't have the money or the vacation time left for
an OWLE because of the holiday's but I reviewed SRNDs while stuck at
the in-laws for xmas.  I flew into San Jose three days before the exam
and Vik was gracious enough to allow me to use his equipment to brush
up on a few things.  I scheduled a 3 day long proctorlabs session and
knocked out as many labs as I could to work on speed.

Some non-study related practices I used were the day before the exam I
go out and watch a movie in the theater.  I would go for a 30 minute
walk the night before to ensure I got a good nights sleep.  Nothing to
strenuous, I didn't want to be soar.  All my exam attempts were
scheduled for a Tuesday.  The reason for the Tuesday was because of
the joke that cars built on Tuesday run the best.  After the RTP
attempt I got a tip to take it in San Jose.  I live in Missouri so
flying to RTP was jumping ahead an hour for my body.  Flying to San
Jose was jumping back 2 hours for me.  So in RTP the exam starts at
7:15am which to me is 6:15am.  On the other hand San Jose the exam
starts at 8:30am so to me that is 10:30am.  I don't know about you but
I'm more alert and ready by 10:30 but I'm still "waking" up at 6:15.
You get 8 hours total for the exam.  That includes the open ended
questions.

What I found most helpful was gathering a lot of the information that
was referenced frequently all in one place.  For example before even
reading the exam I find what the IP addresses of the servers are and
put them at the top of a notepad.  Next I'd get the extension of each
of the phones, the external number mask (if needed), then the mac
address.

Next I'd access all the routers and run the command "sh ip int bri | e
una."  What the command would do is display only the interfaces that
had ip addresses assigned to them.  If some of the layer 3 interfaces
haven't been configured yet I would just run the command again after
configuring them and update my reference sheet.

To make configurations quick and easy for me to recognize I named all
my sites H, A, X.  H was for the HQ site, A was for the first branch
site, and X was the next branch site.

The reference sheet would look like this:

pub x.x.x.x
sub x.x.x.x
cup x.x.x.x
cuc x.x.x.x
ccx x.x.x.x
ntp x.x.x.x
cue x.x.x.x

H1 XXX1 [external num mask] SEP
H2 XXX2 [external num mask] SEP

A1 XXX1 [external num mask] SEP
A2 XXX2 [external num mask] SEP

X1 XXX1 [external num mask] SEP
X2 XXX2 [external num mask] SEP

HQ-RTR#sh ip int bri | e una
[output from hq router]

BR1-RTR#sh ip int bri | e una
[output from br1 router]

BR2-RTR#sh ip int bri | e una
[output from br2 router]

After building the reference sheet I read through the exam, totally
skipping the call routing section.  I took any of the call routing
pages and set them aside.  After reading the exam I did everything I
could with the CLI.  Starting with the infrastructure and DHCP, then
QoS, gateways, media resources, etc.  If something needed to be
registered to CCM I'd make a note of the registration name on the
reference sheet.  Once I did as much as I could to get phones and
gateways registered to CCM I'd start my CCM configurations.  I'd start
with the left to right top down approach starting with the system
menu.  If allowed I'd recommend using auto register for the phones.
Then I configured the gateways and media resources.  Once I ha

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Real world infrastructure question

[Jason Granat]

No problem. Just talking it through, if you have it trunked the local
switch with the SVI doesn't know if the far end has any ports in VLAN
20 up (ignoring VTP pruning, which would actually have the opposite
effect and not forward any traffic to the switches without access
ports in those VLANs). Otherwise the switches with SVIs would also
always need to have access ports in the same VLAN for the SVI to be up
& reachable.

Sent while mobile.

On Jan 9, 2010, at 11:07, Jeff Cotter  wrote:

> Thanks, I did not realize that merely allowing a vlan across a trunk
> would enable the SVI.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Granat [mailto:j...@slash128.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 11:05 AM
> To: Jeff Cotter
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Real world infrastructure question
>
> If VLAN 20 is trunked somewhere the SVI will be up, regardless of
> whether or not there is an access port up in VLAN 20. Having VLAN 20
> trunked from dist to access will satisfy this.
>
> Sent while mobile.
>
> On Jan 9, 2010, at 10:57, Jeff Cotter  wrote:
>
>> Curious how the following scenario would be handled in the real
>> world for  a UC deployment.
>>
>>
>>
>> Assume the Access switches are layer 2 only. ( Data Vlan 10 Voice
>> Vlan 20)  Access switch is trunked to a layer 3 Distribution/Core
>> Switch.  Call Manager and Unity are configured in Vlan 30.  The
>> phones in Voice Vlan 20 need to reach Call Manager in Vlan 30.
>> Typically there would be SVI interfaces configured on Distribution
>> Switch for each Vlan to handle routing between the Vlans.
>>
>>
>>
>> The problem is… there are no IP Phones/hosts plugged into the Dis
>> tri
>> bution Core Switch in VLAN 20 so the SVI interface will not be in a
>> UP state…..therefore no routing between Vlan 20 and Vlan 30 is po
>> ssi
>> ble.  The only solution I see is to plug  an IP Phone into the Distr
>> ibution/Core switch configured in Vlan 20…..I could then take my
>> ent
>> ire voice network down by unplugging that single phone There mus
>> t be a better way…what am I missing?  Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> http://slash128.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Real world infrastructure question

[Jason Granat]

If VLAN 20 is trunked somewhere the SVI will be up, regardless of
whether or not there is an access port up in VLAN 20. Having VLAN 20
trunked from dist to access will satisfy this.

Sent while mobile.

On Jan 9, 2010, at 10:57, Jeff Cotter  wrote:

> Curious how the following scenario would be handled in the real
> world for  a UC deployment.
>
>
>
> Assume the Access switches are layer 2 only. ( Data Vlan 10 Voice
> Vlan 20)  Access switch is trunked to a layer 3 Distribution/Core
> Switch.  Call Manager and Unity are configured in Vlan 30.  The
> phones in Voice Vlan 20 need to reach Call Manager in Vlan 30.
> Typically there would be SVI interfaces configured on Distribution
> Switch for each Vlan to handle routing between the Vlans.
>
>
>
> The problem is… there are no IP Phones/hosts plugged into the Distri
> bution Core Switch in VLAN 20 so the SVI interface will not be in a
> UP state…..therefore no routing between Vlan 20 and Vlan 30 is possi
> ble.  The only solution I see is to plug  an IP Phone into the Distr
> ibution/Core switch configured in Vlan 20…..I could then take my ent
> ire voice network down by unplugging that single phone There mus
> t be a better way…what am I missing?  Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Dates@ RTP

[Jason Granat]

Is Howard the proctor who's signature line when you come in is 'Show
me some ID for who you'd like to be today'? He's cool. Too bad he's
leaving...

Sent while mobile.

On Jan 5, 2010, at 16:58, Robert McGhee  wrote:

> Not sure I guess cisco is looking to replace howard in rtp, i'm sure
> you'll be good to go. He said there were exams scheduled after he
> leaves that were still happening
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hough, Earl 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 7:38 PM
> To: Robert McGhee ; Mark Nigh  >; Mike Thompson ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Dates@ RTP
>
> What about people that already had labs scheduled between January
> and July?  I have one scheduled in April and have received nothing
> in the way of communication telling me that it has been cancelled
> due to the lab being unavailable.
>
> Earl Hough CCIE #16508 (R&S/Security)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-
> boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Robert McGhee
> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 4:55 PM
> To: Mark Nigh; Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Dates@ RTP
>
> Yes it is, I just left the lab in rtp and that's exactly what howard
> said, cisco needs to hire a new proctor for rtp
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Nigh 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 4:51 PM
> To: Robert McGhee ; Mike Thompson 
>  >; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Dates@ RTP
>
> So San Jose is our only option until July 2010?
>
>
>
> [The entire original message is not included]
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] P-Secure violation - Port error disabled

[Jason Granat]

Probably a version issue, both software and supervisor. Check out the 'Command 
History' section below:

switchport port-security maximum
To set the maximum number of secure MAC addresses on a port, use the switchport 
port-security maximum command in interface configuration mode. To return to the 
default settings, use the no form of this command.
switchport port-security maximum maximum [vlan vlan | vlan-list]
no switchport port-security maximum
Syntax Description
maximum

Maximum number of secure MAC addresses for the interface; valid values are from 
1 to 4097.

vlan vlan | vlan-list

(Optional) Specifies a VLAN or range of VLANs; see the "Usage Guidelines" 
section for additional information.


Defaults
This command has no default setings.
Command Modes
Interface configuration
Command History
Release

Modification

12.2(14)SX

Support for this command was introduced on the Supervisor Engine 720.

12.2(17d)SXB

Support for this command on the Supervisor Engine 2 was extended to the Release 
12.2(17d)SXB.

12.2(18)SXE

This command was changed as follows on the Supervisor Engine 720 only:
*The maximum number of secure MAC addresses was changed from 1024 to 4097.
*The vlan vlan | vlan-list keyword and arguments were added.
*With Release 12.2(18)SXE and later releases, port security is supported on 
trunks.
*With Release 12.2(18)SXE and later releases, port security is supported on 
802.1Q tunnel ports.

12.2(33)SRA

This command was integrated into Cisco IOS Release 12.2(33)SRA.


Usage Guidelines
If you enter this command more than once, subsequent use of this command 
overrides the previous value of maximum. If the new maximum argument is larger 
than the current number of the secured addresses on this port, there is no 
effect except to increase the value of the maximum.
If the new maximum is smaller than the old maximum and there are more secure 
addresses on the old maximum, the command is rejected.
If you configure fewer secure MAC addresses than the maximum number of secure 
MAC addresses on the port, the remaining MAC addresses are dynamically learned.
Once the maximum number of secure MAC addresses for the port is reached, no 
more addresses are learned on that port even if the per-VLAN port maximum is 
different from the aggregate maximum number.
You can override the maximum number of secure MAC addresses for the port for a 
specific VLAN or VLANs by entering the switchport port-security maximum maximum 
vlan vlan | vlan-list command.
The vlan-list argument allows you to enter ranges, commas, and delimited 
entries such as 1,7,9-15,17.
The vlan-list argument is visible only if the port has been configured and is 
operational as a trunk. Enter the switchport mode trunk command and then enter 
the switchport nonegotiate command.
Examples
This example shows how to set the maximum number of secure MAC addresses that 
are allowed on this port:
Router(config-if)# switchport port-security maximum 5

This command shows how to override the maximum set for a specific VLAN:
Router(config-if)# switchport port-security maximum 3 vlan 102
Related Commands
Command

Description

show port-security

Display information about the port-security setting.

switchport nonegotiate

Configures the LAN port into permanent trunking mode.




From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of SYED HUSSAIN
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 3:54 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] P-Secure violation - Port error disabled

Hi Guys,

I am having a problem that switchports getting disabled with following error 
message,

 %PORT_SECURITY-SP-2-PSECURE_VIOLATION: Security violation occurred, caused by 
MAC address 00XX..127c on port GigabitEthernet1/1.
 %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: psecure-violation error detected on Gi1/1, putting Gi1/1 
in err-disable state

I found a solution to overcome this problem, by adding following two commands,
.
.
.
switchport port-security maximum 4 vlan access
switchport port-security maximum 4 vlan voice

But the problem is I have Cisco 6509 and it does not take these commands under 
interface. I have the same port-security implemented on Cisco 4506 and there is 
no such problem but only with 6509.

Please suggest the solution of this problem.


Thanks & Regards





http://slash128.com
<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 WB/PG

[Jason Granat]

Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: bkvalent...@gmail.com [mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 2:02 PM
To: Nara Shikamaru; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com; Jason Granat
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 WB/PG

Nor has the UCCX video.


Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: Nara Shikamaru 
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:58:10
To: Jason Granat
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 WB/PG

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com





http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 WB/PG

[Jason Granat]

Thanks!

From: Nara Shikamaru [mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 1:58 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 WB/PG

6-10 haven't been released yet.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jason Granat 
mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

Just checking to see if anyone knows if the Vol 2 workbooks and proctor guides 
are complete. I only have sections 1-5 in my download area. Also, awhile back I 
saw mention that the UCCX VoD missing from the new DVD would be available soon. 
Has anyone seen this yet?

Thanks,

Jason




http://slash128.com<http://slash128.com/>

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>



--
-Shikamaru




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 WB/PG

[Jason Granat]

Hi all,

Just checking to see if anyone knows if the Vol 2 workbooks and proctor guides 
are complete. I only have sections 1-5 in my download area. Also, awhile back I 
saw mention that the UCCX VoD missing from the new DVD would be available soon. 
Has anyone seen this yet?

Thanks,

Jason




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPExpert - Chock up Another Winner!

[Jason Granat]

It is here:

http://www.ipexpert.com/index.cfm/product/sku/CCIE_Voice_Lab_Preparation_Workbook_V2

Sent while mobile.

On Nov 21, 2009, at 2:31 PM, kerboute naoufal 
wrote:

> Hi Experts,
>
> Can any one share with me IP Expert Voice LAB Vol2??
>
> Kind Regards.
>
> *Naoufal Kerboute
> Technical Project Manager UC*
>
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Issue

[Jason Granat]

Thanks for your suggestion. After looking at the SDP header I found the 
difference between a good and bad call was video capabilities. Seems there is a 
TAC bug regarding the issue, but even using their workaround doesn't work. With 
the workaround the call doesn't complete and I think it is because there is a 
video attribute that cannot be removed.

Enhancement to Block Video Codec from Voice class Codec , Open 
CSCtb10108<http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtb10108>
CUCME TAC Issues<http://uc500.com/aggregator/sources/10> - Mon, 11/02/2009 - 
12:36
Symptom: Telco ===(SIP)===CME===Phone with VT The video codec cannot be 
disabled on the voice-class codec. The supported codec will be passed to telco 
if there is no video codec configured on the voice-class codec. Currently, 
there is option to disable the video codec on the voice class codec. However, 
it caused some issue when customer make normal voice call to telco via SIP 
trunk from the SCCP Video Phone. The SIP INVITE message will announce the video 
codec to Telco when the call being made from Video endpoint. Thus, If the VOIP 
telco does not support Video Codec, it caused the telco to drop the call when 
CME announce the video codec within the INVITE Message. This enhancement 
request aims to add a CLI/Method to filter/Remove the Video Codec before send 
to any VOIP Trunk.
Conditions: - Telco does not have video call capability - Make Normal Voice 
call from SCCP Video endpoint
Workaround: 1. Use SIP profiles to change the SDP to indicate no video support 
- note this cannot remove the m-line completely but make it a "zero m-line" 
which indicates SIP video is not supported. The "a=" header is removable by SIP 
profiles. Below is an example for an outbound call: voice class sip-profiles 2 
request INVITE sdp-header Video-Media modify "m=video.*" "m=video 0 RTP/AVP 34 
119" request INVITE sdp-header Video-Attribute remove request INVITE sdp-header 
Video-Bandwidth-Info remove ! dial-peer voice 1 voip session protocol sipv2 
voice-class sip profiles 2 2. Disable CUVA


From: Talmadge Almand [mailto:t...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 4:46 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Issue

You need to capture the Invite going to SP, try using debug ccsip messages and 
events, compare the invites between the one that works and the one that does 
not, could be an SDP issue that is being modified by that parameter.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Jason Granat 
mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:
This is a little off-topic but to me still relevant in my learning process. I'm 
not looking for someone to solve this specific problem, in and of itself. I 
need to know if I am doing something wrong. I want to understand the 
technology. I have a voice lab to pass, you know... :)

Sooo... I've had this issue with a UC520. On CME 7.x or greater I have an issue 
with outbound calls through my SIP carrier having one-way audio, only when 
'service phone videoCabaility' is set to 1 under telephony-service. This does 
not happen on CME 4.2 or lower. I ran some tests. This is all 100% reproducible 
every time. I am trying to pinpoint this thing with sub-nanometer precision...

Here's the basic layout. UC520 with skinny phones (796X & CIPC) with CUVA ball 
cams. SIP trunk to CallCentric. When the video option is off globally in 
telephony-service (service phone videoCapaility 0) all calls are fine. When 
video is enabled (service phone videoCapaility 1) calls from the skinny phones 
out to PSTN via CallCentric have one-way audio: the called party hears just 
fine but the calling party has dead air. No rx on the phone. Wireshark confirms 
no RTP coming back to the phone, yet signaling does. All other calls are fine, 
internal to internal, PSTN to internal.

I started my testing by rebooting the UC520 without modifying the config. When 
it came back up I was able to make outbound calls several times with 100% 
success, with the 'service phone videoCapability' set to 1. After roughly 5 
minutes of uptime I went from 100% success to 100% failure. I rebooted again, 
same behavior:  5  minutes of 100 % outbound calling success, followed by 100% 
failure.

1'st sanity check: while it was working I copied the running config to tftp as 
a 'good' file. After it started failing I copied the running config to tftp as 
a 'bad' file. A diff on the two showed no differences. The config doesn't 
change between 'good' and 'bad'.

2'nd sanity check: I added the entire list of CallCentric supported codecs to 
my 'voice class codec'. When the call works it negotiates G711uLaw. As soon as 
the problem starts happening the call starts negotiating at G729r8. The call 
setup completes

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Issue

[Jason Granat]

Thanks, I'll check out the invites. Appreciate the help!

From: Talmadge Almand [mailto:t...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 4:46 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Issue

You need to capture the Invite going to SP, try using debug ccsip messages and 
events, compare the invites between the one that works and the one that does 
not, could be an SDP issue that is being modified by that parameter.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Jason Granat 
mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:
This is a little off-topic but to me still relevant in my learning process. I'm 
not looking for someone to solve this specific problem, in and of itself. I 
need to know if I am doing something wrong. I want to understand the 
technology. I have a voice lab to pass, you know... :)

Sooo... I've had this issue with a UC520. On CME 7.x or greater I have an issue 
with outbound calls through my SIP carrier having one-way audio, only when 
'service phone videoCabaility' is set to 1 under telephony-service. This does 
not happen on CME 4.2 or lower. I ran some tests. This is all 100% reproducible 
every time. I am trying to pinpoint this thing with sub-nanometer precision...

Here's the basic layout. UC520 with skinny phones (796X & CIPC) with CUVA ball 
cams. SIP trunk to CallCentric. When the video option is off globally in 
telephony-service (service phone videoCapaility 0) all calls are fine. When 
video is enabled (service phone videoCapaility 1) calls from the skinny phones 
out to PSTN via CallCentric have one-way audio: the called party hears just 
fine but the calling party has dead air. No rx on the phone. Wireshark confirms 
no RTP coming back to the phone, yet signaling does. All other calls are fine, 
internal to internal, PSTN to internal.

I started my testing by rebooting the UC520 without modifying the config. When 
it came back up I was able to make outbound calls several times with 100% 
success, with the 'service phone videoCapability' set to 1. After roughly 5 
minutes of uptime I went from 100% success to 100% failure. I rebooted again, 
same behavior:  5  minutes of 100 % outbound calling success, followed by 100% 
failure.

1'st sanity check: while it was working I copied the running config to tftp as 
a 'good' file. After it started failing I copied the running config to tftp as 
a 'bad' file. A diff on the two showed no differences. The config doesn't 
change between 'good' and 'bad'.

2'nd sanity check: I added the entire list of CallCentric supported codecs to 
my 'voice class codec'. When the call works it negotiates G711uLaw. As soon as 
the problem starts happening the call starts negotiating at G729r8. The call 
setup completes, yet one-way audio.

3'rd sanity check: I set 'service phone videoCapability' back to 0, create 
cnf-files, reset phones and things work again, always, without rebooting. This 
parameter is the only thing that changes to break or fix the issue.

4'th sanity check: I watched system uptime with the 'version' command. The 
problem ALWAYS starts happening at the 6 minute mark.

5'th sanity check: This only happens with IOS post 12.4(11)XW10, which has CME 
4.2(0). If I roll back to 12.4(11)XW10 the problem never happens, whether video 
is enabled or not... NEVER!!! In fact I can only have the G711uLaw codec in my 
list and it still works flawlessly on this code... IOS post this release is CME 
version 7.x...

Aaaarrrgg.






http://slash128.com<http://slash128.com/>

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>



--
Regards,

Talmadge Almand
CCIE #20901 (Voice)
Sr, Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL:http://www.IPexpert.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Issue

[Jason Granat]

This is a little off-topic but to me still relevant in my learning process. I'm 
not looking for someone to solve this specific problem, in and of itself. I 
need to know if I am doing something wrong. I want to understand the 
technology. I have a voice lab to pass, you know... :)

Sooo... I've had this issue with a UC520. On CME 7.x or greater I have an issue 
with outbound calls through my SIP carrier having one-way audio, only when 
'service phone videoCabaility' is set to 1 under telephony-service. This does 
not happen on CME 4.2 or lower. I ran some tests. This is all 100% reproducible 
every time. I am trying to pinpoint this thing with sub-nanometer precision...

Here's the basic layout. UC520 with skinny phones (796X & CIPC) with CUVA ball 
cams. SIP trunk to CallCentric. When the video option is off globally in 
telephony-service (service phone videoCapaility 0) all calls are fine. When 
video is enabled (service phone videoCapaility 1) calls from the skinny phones 
out to PSTN via CallCentric have one-way audio: the called party hears just 
fine but the calling party has dead air. No rx on the phone. Wireshark confirms 
no RTP coming back to the phone, yet signaling does. All other calls are fine, 
internal to internal, PSTN to internal.

I started my testing by rebooting the UC520 without modifying the config. When 
it came back up I was able to make outbound calls several times with 100% 
success, with the 'service phone videoCapability' set to 1. After roughly 5 
minutes of uptime I went from 100% success to 100% failure. I rebooted again, 
same behavior:  5  minutes of 100 % outbound calling success, followed by 100% 
failure.

1'st sanity check: while it was working I copied the running config to tftp as 
a 'good' file. After it started failing I copied the running config to tftp as 
a 'bad' file. A diff on the two showed no differences. The config doesn't 
change between 'good' and 'bad'.

2'nd sanity check: I added the entire list of CallCentric supported codecs to 
my 'voice class codec'. When the call works it negotiates G711uLaw. As soon as 
the problem starts happening the call starts negotiating at G729r8. The call 
setup completes, yet one-way audio.

3'rd sanity check: I set 'service phone videoCapability' back to 0, create 
cnf-files, reset phones and things work again, always, without rebooting. This 
parameter is the only thing that changes to break or fix the issue.

4'th sanity check: I watched system uptime with the 'version' command. The 
problem ALWAYS starts happening at the 6 minute mark.

5'th sanity check: This only happens with IOS post 12.4(11)XW10, which has CME 
4.2(0). If I roll back to 12.4(11)XW10 the problem never happens, whether video 
is enabled or not... NEVER!!! In fact I can only have the G711uLaw codec in my 
list and it still works flawlessly on this code... IOS post this release is CME 
version 7.x...

Aaaarrrgg.






http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP trunk

[Jason Granat]

Ahh, didn't catch that in your original email. I've only tried it on CUCME, but 
I think this is what you might be looking for on CUCM:

https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/security/7_0_1/secugd/secrealm.html


From: J Hogan [mailto:j.jho...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:44 AM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP trunk

I wanted to do a SIP trunk directly from CM to the SIP provider and not On the 
router.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Jason Granat 
mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:
Check out the command sip-ua in global config. Your username and
password will go there, along with some other settings...

Sent while mobile.


On Oct 28, 2009, at 21:20, J Hogan 
mailto:j.jho...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have a SIp trunk provider offerin me 2 SIP trunk Likes and there
is a requirment for a USER ID and password But I do not see where to
inter that  does anyone have some documentation somewere on how
to et this type of SIP trunk to work?

--
J. Hogan MCP,CCDA,CCDP, CCNA, CCNP, CCSP, CCAI
Yahoo ID: jhogan552000
AIM ID: jhogan55
MSN ID: jhogan55
ICQ ID: 257599283

Work hard and get a check,
Work smart and earn a living
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>



http://slash128.com



--
J. Hogan MCP,CCDA,CCDP, CCNA, CCNP, CCSP, CCAI
Yahoo ID: jhogan552000
AIM ID: jhogan55
MSN ID: jhogan55
ICQ ID: 257599283

Work hard and get a check,
Work smart and earn a living




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP trunk

[Jason Granat]

Check out the command sip-ua in global config. Your username and
password will go there, along with some other settings...

Sent while mobile.

On Oct 28, 2009, at 21:20, J Hogan  wrote:

> I have a SIp trunk provider offerin me 2 SIP trunk Likes and there
> is a requirment for a USER ID and password But I do not see where to
> inter that  does anyone have some documentation somewere on how
> to et this type of SIP trunk to work?
>
> --
> J. Hogan MCP,CCDA,CCDP, CCNA, CCNP, CCSP, CCAI
> Yahoo ID: jhogan552000
> AIM ID: jhogan55
> MSN ID: jhogan55
> ICQ ID: 257599283
>
> Work hard and get a check,
> Work smart and earn a living
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctor Lab 4 Hr Session

[Jason Granat]

This was the main reason I built a home lab as opposed to rack time. It isuch 
easier for me yo just jump in and try a few things rather than setting aside 8 
hours. Just thinking out loud, er, via list... I don't see why it couldn't be 
all racks. If one needs 8 hours just book back-to-back sessions. Just need some 
way to make sure things don't reset between sessions.

Sent while mobile.

On Oct 22, 2009, at 13:35, Tanner Ezell 
mailto:tanner.ez...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I second this, 4 hour rack sessions would benefit me as well.

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:45 AM, kamal yousaf 
<lovingprin...@gmail.com>
 wrote:

Hello Team,

I heard sometime back that ProctorLabs is planning down the road to have 4 hr rack 
sessions in addition to current 8 hrs sessions to facilitate people like me. I 
have/had lots of problem w.r.t electricity outage/internet outage. Having 4 hr 
sessions will also help us if we need to focus only on certain section or weak areas 
of study instead of doing whole lab all at once.It will offer 
lot more flexibility and help overcome outages and not having whole rack time wasted 
so,its my request to PL and IPexpert team to please consider implementing it at their 
earliest. May be,it could be done only on 1-2 racks initially and if more people find 
it useful,then it can be spanned across other racks as well.

Thanks.


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com




--
Regards,
Tanner Ezell
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPS without AD guide?

[Jason Granat]

This is a very good book, and quite affordable. It walks you through deploying 
various presence features with very detailed steps and troubleshooting section. 
Talks about deployment with & without AD:

http://www.amazon.com/Deploying-Cisco-Unified-Presence-HouTong/dp/0557039533/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1256050060&sr=8-1

Looks like a new Cisco Press book is pre-orderable, but not sure of the 
content, I'm putting it on my "watch" list:

http://www.amazon.com/Cisco-Unified-Presence-Fundamentals-Communications/dp/1587140446/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1256050060&sr=8-2


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael Ciarfello
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 9:00 PM
To: Mike O; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPS without AD guide?

No guide.
Search the OSL archives for keywords such as CUPS, Presence, ad, or IPPM

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mike O [mik...@msn.com]
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 11:56 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPS without AD guide?
I know this has been talked about before but I can't find the thread that talks 
about it.

Anyone have a guide?

Thanks,

Mike




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Audio for the Voice v3 VOD

[Jason Granat]

I did this manually. I copied all the .ipx files from the DVD and renamed to 
.mov. I watched the beginning of each one to know what it was and gave it a 
descriptive name, module 1, etc Those synced directly to my iPhone as 
movies. I also exported the audio from Quicktime, then saved as mp3. In iTunes 
I changed the audio type to ‘Audio Book’. This way on the iPhone I can change 
playback speed on the fly between ½X, 1X and 2X. Very nice while driving…

HTH

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of DeShon Crayton
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 4:50 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Audio for the Voice v3 VOD


Does anyone know if there is an option to get the audio for the Voice v3 VOD 
class?

I would like to play the audio while driving.




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No Product, Full refund.. simple logic?? not really??

[Jason Granat]

Hi Michael,

I don't keep posts unless they have particular value to me so I can't quote 
anything specific, but I have had correspondance with enough list members 
off-list to know it's not all in my head. I also don't want to prolong the 
thread anymore than necessary. But I do appreciate your response AND passion 
around keeping the CCIE valuable. It is our bread and butter after all! I truly 
hope I didn't sound like a jerk and I apologize if my own passion got out of 
line. I do agree with you that there has been some very valuable discussion and 
that is exactly what I want to protect. I just want is to all be one big happy 
geeky family!

Let the healing begin :-)

Sent while mobile.

On Sep 18, 2009, at 11:25, Michael Ciarfello 
mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com>> wrote:

I agree (and I'm a big violator,)  Then let's tighten the rules down a little 
bit.  I get a little passionate when someone comes on here asking for software, 
etc.  My company had to pay for it (we have to spend so much per year on lab 
equipment per Cisco).  IPExpert had to pay for it for 28? racks.  So should 
everyone else.  Asking for or selling illegal software, workbooks, etc needs to 
be put as a rule when you sign up.  After the v2 fiasco, people are a little 
more passionate about protecting the intregrity of the certification they are 
after.  Not just me.  We should just ignore those looking for illegal items and 
let IPexpert give the warning / banning.

People shouldn't post their grievences against IPExpert on a public forum.  
That was already said.  The original posted stood up and wanted an opinion in a 
unorthodox way and received many unorthodox opinions.  I agree, I should have 
just posted, don't bug us here, it's wrong, go see IPExpert.

What else is bugging you?  I went back through recent topics and couldn't find 
anything else that is insensitive postings.

I think the technical posts are great and we have great discussion here.  MUCH 
MUCH better than anyone else's forum.  The list has also been bery helpful with 
multiple people providing good answers for a couple people recently looking for 
help with some production questions they had.

From: Jason Granat [...@slash128.com]
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 1:36 PM
To: Wayne Lawson
Cc: Thomas Koch; 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>; Michael 
Ciarfello
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No Product, Full refund.. simple logic?? not 
really??

Wayne,

I appreciate the list and don't want to turn it into a soapbox forum. In fact, 
that's exactly the oppsoite of what I want. Honestly there have been some 
insensitive and holier-than-thou posting in the past, not just with this 
thread, and I have personally been discouraged from using the list because of 
it. Ive seen post just shy of people calling others idiots in more subtle 
words. I have also talked to others off list that feel the same way. My post 
was much less about the refund and much more about common courtesy and civility 
on the list. Hope this makes sense and others hear the point.

Sent while mobile.

On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:05, Wayne Lawson 
<<mailto:groupst...@ipexpert.com>groupst...@ipexpert.com<mailto:groupst...@ipexpert.com>>
 wrote:

Guys - I'll deal with this customer directly, but as of this morning there was 
not a refund request. We've never denied one and never will.

I think it's obvious that we care about our clients and do a great job - 
therefore I'm not even going to take the time to defend or respond to these 
comments.

We reserve the right to cancel classes per our registration form, and 
honestly - most of our online classes never took off or filled up - students 
prefer to be live with the instructor. I made the call to cancel these 2 
classes and invest the instructor's time in product development due to the 
massive amounts of changes and work we had ahead of us.

It's unfortunate that this student had a class cancelled twice, but if he 
would have invested in a live class - it would have been delivered (I don't 
think we've cancelled one live class this year). Also, we did notify this 
client in a timely manner as outlined on the registration form that he signed.

This is a support list - so from now on please contact your Training 
Advisor if you have any unresolved issues - or contact me directly. Everyone 
here has my email address -and can see my cell number on my posts / signature - 
making untrue statements and complaining on a study list that I pay for and 
maintain is a bit irritating.

Regards,

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder & President - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: <mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com> <mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com> 
<mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com> wlaw...@ipexpert.com<mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com>
M

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No Product, Full refund.. simple logic?? not really??

[Jason Granat]

Wayne,

I appreciate the list and don't want to turn it into a soapbox forum. In fact, 
that's exactly the oppsoite of what I want. Honestly there have been some 
insensitive and holier-than-thou posting in the past, not just with this 
thread, and I have personally been discouraged from using the list because of 
it. Ive seen post just shy of people calling others idiots in more subtle 
words. I have also talked to others off list that feel the same way. My post 
was much less about the refund and much more about common courtesy and civility 
on the list. Hope this makes sense and others hear the point.

Sent while mobile.

On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:05, Wayne Lawson 
mailto:groupst...@ipexpert.com>> wrote:

Guys - I'll deal with this customer directly, but as of this morning there was 
not a refund request. We've never denied one and never will.

I think it's obvious that we care about our clients and do a great job - 
therefore I'm not even going to take the time to defend or respond to these 
comments.

We reserve the right to cancel classes per our registration form, and 
honestly - most of our online classes never took off or filled up - students 
prefer to be live with the instructor. I made the call to cancel these 2 
classes and invest the instructor's time in product development due to the 
massive amounts of changes and work we had ahead of us.

It's unfortunate that this student had a class cancelled twice, but if he 
would have invested in a live class - it would have been delivered (I don't 
think we've cancelled one live class this year). Also, we did notify this 
client in a timely manner as outlined on the registration form that he signed.

This is a support list - so from now on please contact your Training 
Advisor if you have any unresolved issues - or contact me directly. Everyone 
here has my email address -and can see my cell number on my posts / signature - 
making untrue statements and complaining on a study list that I pay for and 
maintain is a bit irritating.

Regards,

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder & President - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: <mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com> <mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com> 
wlaw...@ipexpert.com<mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com>
Mobile: +1.810.334.1564

:: Message sent from iPhone.

On Sep 18, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Jason Granat 
<<mailto:j...@slash128.com>j...@slash128.com<mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:

You know, I don't agree that this is the right forum either but frankly I am a 
bit perturbed by the majority of responses I have seen.

I think Joel's underlying point may be missed. Strip away the details about his 
lab date, job, study schedule, etc. He paid for a class which has been 
cancelled more than once and with practically no notice. He simply wants our 
opinion whether or not he is justified in his request for a refund for an 
undelivered product. To answer you Joel I say yes. If the vendor has the right 
to cancel the class why doesn't he have the right to cancel his order, 
especially if they can't give him a delivery timeframe?

I'm sure we all realize that a boot camp/vclass is not a golden ticket/silver 
bullet. I personally have never taken one, but it must be an important enough 
aspect of preparation for people to pay $1499, and that's the discounted price. 
But also keep in mind that reserving a whole week for a class is not exactly an 
easy task in the life of an implementation engineer. Then to have to reschedule 
it amidst work/project/personal schedule is even more difficult. If you find 
this easy please let me know where to send my resume. Or perhaps not, as it 
likely means your company doesn't have the work to keep you busy :-)

I have been coming to IPExpert for lab prep material for the last 3 years now 
and for good reason: they deliver great material. But in Joel's situation he is 
requesting a refund for an undelivered product. Depending on his 
work/project/personal schedule I can't say I would not do the same.

Before you are so quick to disagree and knock this guy let's apply the same 
scenario with a different product, but the same timeline. Let's say you spent 
$1499 on a new HD flat screen in March this year and you are told delivery is 
going to be in Sept. That's fine, you know this up front so you can wait. Later 
your order is delayed due to manufacturer issues, but then they contact you and 
the manufacturer CEO assures you it will be delivered. Then it gets delayed a 
more times and they are non-responsive to your attempts to contact them. When 
they do finally contact you it is two days before the delivery date they gave 
you, but only to tell you it is delayed again and they can't give you any 
timeframe for delivery. I would bet that most people here would be asking for a 
refund and go buy that HD flatscreen elsewhere. And I would 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No Product, Full refund.. simple logic?? not really??

[Jason Granat]

Thank you Vik! I have always had faith in you guys and I am still loyal :-) 
just felt Joel deserved some defending...

Sent while mobile.

On Sep 18, 2009, at 9:39, Vik Malhi 
mailto:vma...@ipexpert.com>> wrote:

Just to clarify the issue- yes we cancelled a class due to a very low number of 
people registered. We hate doing this as we know it disrupts your study 
schedule. In an ideal world we would have liked to give more notice. As soon as 
the request was put in we issued a full refund- that was never in doubt! 
Hopefully that’s the matter resolved.

--
Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto:  vma...@ipexpert.com<mailto:vma...@ipexpert.com>


Join our free online support and peer group communities:
<http://www.IPexpert.com/communities>http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and 
Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security 
Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.







________
From: Jason Granat 
<j...@slash128.com<mailto:j...@slash128.com>>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:20:58 -0700
To: Thomas Koch 
<koch1...@comcast.net<mailto:koch1...@comcast.net>>
Cc: OSL Group 
<ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>>,
 Michael Ciarfello <mciarfe...@iplogic.com<mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com>>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No Product, Full refund.. simple logic?? not 
really??

You know, I don't agree that this is the right forum either but frankly I am a 
bit perturbed by the majority of responses I have seen.

I think Joel's underlying point may be missed. Strip away the details about his 
lab date, job, study schedule, etc. He paid for a class which has been 
cancelled more than once and with practically no notice. He simply wants our 
opinion whether or not he is justified in his request for a refund for an 
undelivered product. To answer you Joel I say yes. If the vendor has the right 
to cancel the class why doesn't he have the right to cancel his order, 
especially if they can't give him a delivery timeframe?

I'm sure we all realize that a boot camp/vclass is not a golden ticket/silver 
bullet. I personally have never taken one, but it must be an important enough 
aspect of preparation for people to pay $1499, and that's the discounted price. 
But also keep in mind that reserving a whole week for a class is not exactly an 
easy task in the life of an implementation engineer. Then to have to reschedule 
it amidst work/project/personal schedule is even more difficult. If you find 
this easy please let me know where to send my resume. Or perhaps not, as it 
likely means your company doesn't have the work to keep you busy :-)

I have been coming to IPExpert for lab prep material for the last 3 years now 
and for good reason: they deliver great material. But in Joel's situation he is 
requesting a refund for an undelivered product. Depending on his 
work/project/personal schedule I can't say I would not do the same.

Before you are so quick to disagree and knock this guy let's apply the same 
scenario with a different product, but the same timeline. Let's say you spent 
$1499 on a new HD flat screen in March this year and you are told delivery is 
going to be in Sept. That's fine, you know this up front so you can wait. Later 
your order is delayed due to manufacturer issues, but then they contact you and 
the manufacturer CEO assures you it will be delivered. Then it gets delayed a 
more times and they are non-responsive to your attempts to contact them. When 
they do finally contact you it is two days before the delivery date they gave 
you, but only to tell you it is delayed again and they can't give you any 
timeframe for delivery. I would bet that most people here would be asking for a 
refund and go buy that HD flatscreen elsewhere. And I would further bet that if 
the manufacturer had a forum you'd be posting your frustration there as well.

Now this is all on assumption that Joel's account is accurate. IPExpert may 
have a different story to tell. If they do I personally would like to hear it. 
My bottom line point is not to knock IPExpert but that it seems to me that most 
responses have been missing the root issue that Joel is dealing with. Is he 
justified in requesting a refund for an (expensive) undelivered product, 
especially when the vendor hasn't given him any idea if/when it will be 
delivered, and the associated rescheduling of work projects and family life is 
very difficult.

Sent while mobile.

On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:06, Thomas Koch 
<koch1...@comcast.net<mailto:koch1...@comcast.net>> wrote:

Joel,
I remember a thread that you started about a we

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No Product, Full refund.. simple logic?? not really??

[Jason Granat]

You know, I don't agree that this is the right forum either but frankly I am a 
bit perturbed by the majority of responses I have seen.

I think Joel's underlying point may be missed. Strip away the details about his 
lab date, job, study schedule, etc. He paid for a class which has been 
cancelled more than once and with practically no notice. He simply wants our 
opinion whether or not he is justified in his request for a refund for an 
undelivered product. To answer you Joel I say yes. If the vendor has the right 
to cancel the class why doesn't he have the right to cancel his order, 
especially if they can't give him a delivery timeframe?

I'm sure we all realize that a boot camp/vclass is not a golden ticket/silver 
bullet. I personally have never taken one, but it must be an important enough 
aspect of preparation for people to pay $1499, and that's the discounted price. 
But also keep in mind that reserving a whole week for a class is not exactly an 
easy task in the life of an implementation engineer. Then to have to reschedule 
it amidst work/project/personal schedule is even more difficult. If you find 
this easy please let me know where to send my resume. Or perhaps not, as it 
likely means your company doesn't have the work to keep you busy :-)

I have been coming to IPExpert for lab prep material for the last 3 years now 
and for good reason: they deliver great material. But in Joel's situation he is 
requesting a refund for an undelivered product. Depending on his 
work/project/personal schedule I can't say I would not do the same.

Before you are so quick to disagree and knock this guy let's apply the same 
scenario with a different product, but the same timeline. Let's say you spent 
$1499 on a new HD flat screen in March this year and you are told delivery is 
going to be in Sept. That's fine, you know this up front so you can wait. Later 
your order is delayed due to manufacturer issues, but then they contact you and 
the manufacturer CEO assures you it will be delivered. Then it gets delayed a 
more times and they are non-responsive to your attempts to contact them. When 
they do finally contact you it is two days before the delivery date they gave 
you, but only to tell you it is delayed again and they can't give you any 
timeframe for delivery. I would bet that most people here would be asking for a 
refund and go buy that HD flatscreen elsewhere. And I would further bet that if 
the manufacturer had a forum you'd be posting your frustration there as well.

Now this is all on assumption that Joel's account is accurate. IPExpert may 
have a different story to tell. If they do I personally would like to hear it. 
My bottom line point is not to knock IPExpert but that it seems to me that most 
responses have been missing the root issue that Joel is dealing with. Is he 
justified in requesting a refund for an (expensive) undelivered product, 
especially when the vendor hasn't given him any idea if/when it will be 
delivered, and the associated rescheduling of work projects and family life is 
very difficult.

Sent while mobile.

On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:06, Thomas Koch 
mailto:koch1...@comcast.net>> wrote:

Joel,
I remember a thread that you started about a week ago asking for feedback on 
postponing your CCIE cert based on the new job that you were consideringDid 
you old company come back and counter offer you to stay with a promise of more 
$$$ if you got your CCIE Voice cert?

Please take up the refund issue with IPExpert…this is not the proper forum.

I’ve been in IT for 20 years….I’ve seen training classes  get canceled all of 
the time…I had a CVP class about a year ago get canceled about 3 days before 
the class was schedule to start…Training providers are not going to conduct a 
class with 1-2 students. It’s not cost effective. They have to pay the 
instructors and would like to make a profit as well…

Michael is correct; Boot camps are not the magic bullet to pass a lab or a 
cert. They reinforce what knowledge that you have and help you build on it…
Seat the lab in Dec. and take that experience and use it to better yourself… or 
just reschedule the CCIE lab. I’m not sure what the real issue is?

Thomas J Koch
Owner/Consultant
Digitones, LLC
Cell: 630-808-4910
E-mail:  
digito...@comcast.net

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Joel Jose
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 5:28 AM
To: Michael Ciarfello
Cc:  
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No Product,Full refund.. simple logic?? not 
really??

Michael,

quite rightly i am dissapointed. I'm sure its not without reason. For one second just 
forget about my lab and my passing the lab etc.. ipexpert is a company...so if 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about building CUCM/UC/UCCX/CUPS on VMware

[Jason Granat]

Bingo :-)

Sent while mobile.

On Sep 15, 2009, at 11:58 PM, Michael Ciarfello 
mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com>> wrote:

A simplier scenario/example:

No one also said that both CallManagers will be always be at the HQ site.  
Gives new headaches to the QoS questions.

So you can use the second NIC to plug into the Br1 switch.

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
 [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jason Granat [...@slash128.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 1:54 AM
To: Cisco Dave
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>; 
<mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com> mthompson...@gmail.com<mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about building CUCM/UC/UCCX/CUPS on 
VMware

For budget conscious home lab purposes there probably isn't substantial reason 
to go with multiple NICs, but I wanted to offer up a different perspective, 
purely for technical value. Let me preface by saying I use my lab server for 
more than just voice study. I also work with other Cisco applications 
(security, management, etc.), so I have greater need for bandwidth and 
multi-VLAN flexibility.

I currently run 10 NIC ports. Two onboard and 4 x dual port port Intel Pro 
1000. This is for two reasons:

1) Bandwidth. I created 5 EtherChannels on my core switch, each to a separate 
NIC team consisting of one pair of NICs each. One NIC team is dedicated to the 
host OS for segregation.

2) VLAN/Subnet separation. I could just trunk VLANs to the NIC teams but I 
didn't want a single NIC to become a bandwidth bottleneck. As stated above one 
of the teams is dedicated to the host OS. The other 4 are each assigned to a 
separate VLAN. This allows me to split virtual servers up into various subnets 
to toy with L3 separation of services without having to provision WAN style 
connectivity.

While my setup is probably overkill for strictly voice lab study I would agree 
that, as Cisco Dave stated, having at least a second separate NIC allows you to 
dedicate one NIC to the host server in a fixed subnet and the second NIC can be 
provisioned on a per practice lab basis in different subnets without affecting 
connectivity to the host server. If your NIC supports it you could trunk a 
single NIC but this aggregates bandwidth from all VMs into one link.

HTH,

Jason

On Sep 15, 2009, at 10:24 PM, Cisco Dave wrote:

I use two nic cards in my pc that runs the vmware, so I can have access to the 
internal vmware network (not a private address space), and the external 
internet at the same time. But as far as the images themselves are concerned I 
agree, there is no advantage of having two nics.

Cheers,
cd


From: <mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com> 
mthompson...@gmail.com<mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com>
To: <mailto:ccie834...@gmail.com> ccie834...@gmail.com<mailto:ccie834...@gmail.com>; 
<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:36:45 -0400
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about building CUCM/UC/UCCX/CUPS on 
VMware

For the amount of bandwidth we’d be pushing out of the servers, there’s no 
reason to have a dedicated NIC.



Two important notes on this:



1)  If all of your servers are on the same physical VMWare host.  All 
inter-server traffic occurs via RAM within the host…nothing hits the NIC.
2)  The only advantage I can think of for having a separate NIC is to 
‘seclude’ your Windows2003 server from the UCM network (unless you can VLAN the 
NIC on the server).



My 2 cents, but HTH



From: <mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com> 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com> 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccie8340tx
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 2:29 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about building CUCM/UC/UCCX/CUPS on VMware



Folks:



I finally have a windows 2003 server built and getting ready to load vmware. I 
have read instructions from Mark Hollaway's website and find it very helpful. 
Thanks Mark.



Question now. I am new to vmware and I understand that in order to setup each 
of the above servers, one needs  avirtual switch configured on VMWARE server 
either on the same host OS NIC nic or a dedicated second NIC



So is that the best way to go about this ?



Appreciate any ideas on best way to go about this.



Thanks,Padhu




Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it 
now.<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/> 
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
<http://www.ipexper

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about building CUCM/UC/UCCX/CUPS on VMware

[Jason Granat]

For budget conscious home lab purposes there probably isn't substantial reason 
to go with multiple NICs, but I wanted to offer up a different perspective, 
purely for technical value. Let me preface by saying I use my lab server for 
more than just voice study. I also work with other Cisco applications 
(security, management, etc.), so I have greater need for bandwidth and 
multi-VLAN flexibility.

I currently run 10 NIC ports. Two onboard and 4 x dual port port Intel Pro 
1000. This is for two reasons:

1) Bandwidth. I created 5 EtherChannels on my core switch, each to a separate 
NIC team consisting of one pair of NICs each. One NIC team is dedicated to the 
host OS for segregation.

2) VLAN/Subnet separation. I could just trunk VLANs to the NIC teams but I 
didn't want a single NIC to become a bandwidth bottleneck. As stated above one 
of the teams is dedicated to the host OS. The other 4 are each assigned to a 
separate VLAN. This allows me to split virtual servers up into various subnets 
to toy with L3 separation of services without having to provision WAN style 
connectivity.

While my setup is probably overkill for strictly voice lab study I would agree 
that, as Cisco Dave stated, having at least a second separate NIC allows you to 
dedicate one NIC to the host server in a fixed subnet and the second NIC can be 
provisioned on a per practice lab basis in different subnets without affecting 
connectivity to the host server. If your NIC supports it you could trunk a 
single NIC but this aggregates bandwidth from all VMs into one link.

HTH,

Jason

On Sep 15, 2009, at 10:24 PM, Cisco Dave wrote:

I use two nic cards in my pc that runs the vmware, so I can have access to the 
internal vmware network (not a private address space), and the external 
internet at the same time. But as far as the images themselves are concerned I 
agree, there is no advantage of having two nics.

Cheers,
cd


From: mthompson...@gmail.com
To: ccie834...@gmail.com; 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:36:45 -0400
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about building CUCM/UC/UCCX/CUPS on 
VMware

For the amount of bandwidth we’d be pushing out of the servers, there’s no 
reason to have a dedicated NIC.



Two important notes on this:



1)  If all of your servers are on the same physical VMWare host.  All 
inter-server traffic occurs via RAM within the host…nothing hits the NIC.
2)  The only advantage I can think of for having a separate NIC is to 
‘seclude’ your Windows2003 server from the UCM network (unless you can VLAN the 
NIC on the server).



My 2 cents, but HTH



From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccie8340tx
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 2:29 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about building CUCM/UC/UCCX/CUPS on VMware



Folks:



I finally have a windows 2003 server built and getting ready to load vmware. I 
have read instructions from Mark Hollaway's website and find it very helpful. 
Thanks Mark.



Question now. I am new to vmware and I understand that in order to setup each 
of the above servers, one needs  avirtual switch configured on VMWARE server 
either on the same host OS NIC nic or a dedicated second NIC



So is that the best way to go about this ?



Appreciate any ideas on best way to go about this.



Thanks,Padhu




Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it 
now. 
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com





http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3 Lab Topology

[Jason Granat]

I found the reference in my notes. It was a tweet from the CCIE Voice 
techtorial:

"IPexpertVoice: Topology: same as before. HQ contains servers, BR1 remote CUCM site, 
BR2 CME"

Also, there was another tweet that mentioned IP addressing and dial plan:

"IPexpertVoice: every pod in CCIE Voice will have the same IP Address and PSTN numbering 
scheme. no more "YY" in number/ip address."

I have the PDF's from Networkers 2009 as well but couldn't find this either. I 
wonder if I don't have the CCIE Voice techtorial pres because it was a paid 
session that I didn't pay for.

Anyway, if this is published stuff I would very much like to know where to get 
it. In the other tracks this type of information (IP addressing, toplogy, etc.) 
seemed to be kept secret. At least I never saw anything about topology other 
than what I saw in my actual lab attempts. I would catch rumors every now and 
then about potential number of devices but nothing this specific. I sat in on 
the CCIE SP techtorial at Networkers 2007 and the speaker alluded to an 
approximate number of devices and gave a sample topology, but it was just that, 
a sample.

Anyway, thanks for looking!

Sent while mobile

On Sep 6, 2009, at 18:12, Ohamien Uhakheme 
mailto:oham...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I still have access to all of the 2009 Networkers Documentation, but I see 
nothing for the CCIE Voice, only SAN and Wireless.

If you happen to run across the thread, and it gives any more detail, I will be 
happy to search again.

Ohamien

On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, dave menk 
<menk...@hotmail.com> 
wrote:
Agreed, if anyone knows how to get Networker v3 that would be appriciated.

Thanks,
cd


From:  j...@slash128.com
To:  
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 14:19:44 -0700
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3 Lab Topology




So I am curious about something... I thought I saw a post a while back
that it was said at the Networkers tech-torial that the new v3 lab
topology would be the same. Is this posted on Cisco.com 
somewhere? In
other tracks I never saw the topology published. A link to something
on Cisco.com would be highly appreciated :-)

Thanks!



 http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com



Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Try it 
now.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com






http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3 Lab Topology

[Jason Granat]

So I am curious about something... I thought I saw a post a while back
that it was said at the Networkers tech-torial that the new v3 lab
topology would be the same. Is this posted on Cisco.com somewhere? In
other tracks I never saw the topology published. A link to something
on Cisco.com would be highly appreciated :-)

Thanks!



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New VoD's?

[Jason Granat]

Wayne, I wasn't trying to start a huge deal. Just asked of anyone had seen them 
yet. I sent my order in right after the news came out. When I called in I was told 
they would ship by 9/4 at the latest so I wanted to check status.   You have a 
loyal repeat customer here. I purchased IPExpert material for my R&S prep and 
my SP prep. You guys produce top notch material and I'm just eager to get going 
with the Voice updates...

Sent while mobile

On Sep 5, 2009, at 16:34, Wayne Lawson 
mailto:groupst...@ipexpert.com>> wrote:

Jason - please (in addition to Rick's response) - these are being shipped out 
in the order they were received...

Regards,

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder & President - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: <mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com> <mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com> 
wlaw...@ipexpert.com<mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com>
Mobile: +1.810.334.1564

:: Message sent from iPhone.

On Sep 5, 2009, at 7:09 PM, Jason Granat 
<<mailto:j...@slash128.com>j...@slash128.com<mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:

For the $25 shipping fee for a DVD I was hoping for USPS Overnight :-)

Sent while mobile

On Sep 5, 2009, at 15:34, Tanner Ezell 
<<mailto:tanner.ez...@gmail.com><mailto:tanner.ez...@gmail.com>tanner.ez...@gmail.com<mailto:tanner.ez...@gmail.com>>
 wrote:

Well unless it was sent USPS, it is Saturday after all :)

On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Jason Granat 
<<mailto:j...@slash128.com><mailto:j...@slash128.com><mailto:j...@slash128.com>j...@slash128.com<mailto:j...@slash128.com>>
 wrote:
Anyone recieve them yet? I was told they would ship by 9/4 at the
latest and we'd hopefully be recieving them on 9/5 Nothing showing
up here yet...

Sent while mobile



<http://slash128.com><http://slash128.com><http://slash128.com>http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
<http://www.ipexpert.com> <http://www.ipexpert.com> <http://www.ipexpert.com> 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>





<http://slash128.com><http://slash128.com>http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
<http://www.ipexpert.com> <http://www.ipexpert.com> 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New VoD's?

[Jason Granat]

Understood, but anxious :-)

Sent while mobile

On Sep 5, 2009, at 16:15, Rick Mur 
mailto:r...@ipexpert.com>> wrote:

As you can read on our blog, the VOD is definitely finished, but our order 
fulfillment team needs to cramp out 700!! DVD-sets, so please forgive us if we 
couldn't make the exact shipping date, but we are working around the clock to 
get them to you!


--
Regards,

Rick Mur
CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider)
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: <http://www.IPexpert.com> http://www.IPexpert.com

On 6 sep 2009, at 01:09, Jason Granat wrote:

For the $25 shipping fee for a DVD I was hoping for USPS Overnight :-)

Sent while mobile

On Sep 5, 2009, at 15:34, Tanner Ezell 
<<mailto:tanner.ez...@gmail.com>tanner.ez...@gmail.com<mailto:tanner.ez...@gmail.com>>
 wrote:

Well unless it was sent USPS, it is Saturday after all :)

On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Jason Granat 
<<mailto:j...@slash128.com><mailto:j...@slash128.com>j...@slash128.com<mailto:j...@slash128.com>>
 wrote:
Anyone recieve them yet? I was told they would ship by 9/4 at the
latest and we'd hopefully be recieving them on 9/5 Nothing showing
up here yet...

Sent while mobile



<http://slash128.com/><http://slash128.com/>http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
<http://www.ipexpert.com/> <http://www.ipexpert.com/> 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>





<http://slash128.com>http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
<http://www.ipexpert.com> www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>





http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New VoD's?

[Jason Granat]

For the $25 shipping fee for a DVD I was hoping for USPS Overnight :-)

Sent while mobile

On Sep 5, 2009, at 15:34, Tanner Ezell 
mailto:tanner.ez...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Well unless it was sent USPS, it is Saturday after all :)

On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Jason Granat 
<<mailto:j...@slash128.com>j...@slash128.com<mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:
Anyone recieve them yet? I was told they would ship by 9/4 at the
latest and we'd hopefully be recieving them on 9/5 Nothing showing
up here yet...

Sent while mobile



<http://slash128.com>http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
<http://www.ipexpert.com> www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>





http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] New VoD's?

[Jason Granat]

Anyone recieve them yet? I was told they would ship by 9/4 at the
latest and we'd hopefully be recieving them on 9/5 Nothing showing
up here yet...

Sent while mobile



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two

[Jason Granat]

Yeah, but unfortunately my insurance doesn't have coverage for the kind of help 
I need :-)

By the way, Jonathan, I never actually said it before so I'll say it now: 
Congrats! That is fantastic!

-Original Message-
From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 12:12 PM
To: Jason Granat; 'Brian Valentine'; 'Jonathan Charles'
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two

Jason...YOU my friend, need help :)

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jason Granat
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 2:42 PM
To: Brian Valentine; Jonathan Charles
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two

25309, hmm... 2+5+3+0+9 = 19, 1+9 = 10, 10 = 2 in binary. Since this was
your second attempt I think it all adds up...

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Brian Valentine
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:34 AM
To: Jonathan Charles
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two

CONGRATS!   25309 is a round enough number, huh?!  I bet you can live with
that!

That's quite the achievement!  And to think, you left 30 minutes and a
few points on the table and still passed.  You are my hero!

Best wishes in all your future endeavors.


On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> OK, I got 25309
>
> Weird, I passed who knew?
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:13 AM, kapil atrish wrote:
>> I cracked mine on 3rd go in V2. Be consistent...good luck
>>
>> --- On Wed, 9/2/09, Ravindra Lakpriya  wrote:
>>
>> From: Ravindra Lakpriya 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two
>> To: "Tanner Ezell" 
>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 11:00 AM
>>
>> Let's hope for the best man. U ll nail it. All the best dude.
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 2, 2009, Tanner Ezell 
>> wrote:
>>> Good luck Jonathan, look forward to hearing the results!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Jonathan Charles 
>>> wrote:
>>> OK, took v3 again in RTP today... finished 30 minutes early...
>>>
>>> Well, not really... what happened was that I was doing some last
>>> minute tweaking (just retesting stuff, cleaning up some config) and
>>> some key huge point items stopped working... I undid what I did to
>>> break stuff, got up and walked away... yes, there was 30 minutes on
>>> the table, but it could have been the death of me...
>>>
>>> Anyway, waiting on results I would like to claim optimism, as I
>>> studied the crap out of my shortcomings last time, but I have done
>>> this before where I walked out of a lab pretty confident to see zero
>>> on sections I thought I aced... to be honest, I am like 85% sure I
>>> failed again.
>>>
>>> As they all say, the test is fair, nothing out of left field, some
>>> surprises on what was on there and what wasn't... there are some
>>> sleazy traps, but if you have a clue, you will work around em pretty
>>> quick...
>>>
>>>
>>> Took the first one in SJ, took this one in RTP... so, I can compare...
>>>
>>> In SJ, the phones are nailed to the walls in the cubicle... in RTP,
>>> they are on the desk (so you can flip em over and look at em...)...
>>> not sure which I prefer... I kinda like throwing them at the wall...
>>> But then again, in SJ, Ben Ng is sitting 4 feet from you, so, no
>>> intimidation there...
>>>
>>> I saw the remnants of the old v2 labs sitting in RTP, still had phones
>>> and fax machines... looked abandoned...
>>>
>>> Everything else I could say would be NDA... so, guys, do what you
>>> always do, look for the flurry of questions on 'how do I" in this
>>> group or as veiled customer issues on Puck
>>>
>>> As a joke, here are the four questions I would ask:
>>>
>>> Why on this day are we limited on how we can dial? When on all other
>>> days we can dial however we want?
>>> Why on this day must we use frame-relay, when on all other days, all
>>> of our customers have MPLS?
>>> Why on this day are we running unpatched, basically beta-versions of
>>> CUCM, CUPS, CUCCX, when on other days we can install patches to get
>>> around bugs?
>>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two

[Jason Granat]

25309, hmm... 2+5+3+0+9 = 19, 1+9 = 10, 10 = 2 in binary. Since this was your 
second attempt I think it all adds up...

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Brian Valentine
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:34 AM
To: Jonathan Charles
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two

CONGRATS!   25309 is a round enough number, huh?!  I bet you can live with that!

That's quite the achievement!  And to think, you left 30 minutes and a
few points on the table and still passed.  You are my hero!

Best wishes in all your future endeavors.


On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> OK, I got 25309
>
> Weird, I passed who knew?
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:13 AM, kapil atrish wrote:
>> I cracked mine on 3rd go in V2. Be consistent...good luck
>>
>> --- On Wed, 9/2/09, Ravindra Lakpriya  wrote:
>>
>> From: Ravindra Lakpriya 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two
>> To: "Tanner Ezell" 
>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 11:00 AM
>>
>> Let's hope for the best man. U ll nail it. All the best dude.
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 2, 2009, Tanner Ezell 
>> wrote:
>>> Good luck Jonathan, look forward to hearing the results!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Jonathan Charles 
>>> wrote:
>>> OK, took v3 again in RTP today... finished 30 minutes early...
>>>
>>> Well, not really... what happened was that I was doing some last
>>> minute tweaking (just retesting stuff, cleaning up some config) and
>>> some key huge point items stopped working... I undid what I did to
>>> break stuff, got up and walked away... yes, there was 30 minutes on
>>> the table, but it could have been the death of me...
>>>
>>> Anyway, waiting on results I would like to claim optimism, as I
>>> studied the crap out of my shortcomings last time, but I have done
>>> this before where I walked out of a lab pretty confident to see zero
>>> on sections I thought I aced... to be honest, I am like 85% sure I
>>> failed again.
>>>
>>> As they all say, the test is fair, nothing out of left field, some
>>> surprises on what was on there and what wasn't... there are some
>>> sleazy traps, but if you have a clue, you will work around em pretty
>>> quick...
>>>
>>>
>>> Took the first one in SJ, took this one in RTP... so, I can compare...
>>>
>>> In SJ, the phones are nailed to the walls in the cubicle... in RTP,
>>> they are on the desk (so you can flip em over and look at em...)...
>>> not sure which I prefer... I kinda like throwing them at the wall...
>>> But then again, in SJ, Ben Ng is sitting 4 feet from you, so, no
>>> intimidation there...
>>>
>>> I saw the remnants of the old v2 labs sitting in RTP, still had phones
>>> and fax machines... looked abandoned...
>>>
>>> Everything else I could say would be NDA... so, guys, do what you
>>> always do, look for the flurry of questions on 'how do I" in this
>>> group or as veiled customer issues on Puck
>>>
>>> As a joke, here are the four questions I would ask:
>>>
>>> Why on this day are we limited on how we can dial? When on all other
>>> days we can dial however we want?
>>> Why on this day must we use frame-relay, when on all other days, all
>>> of our customers have MPLS?
>>> Why on this day are we running unpatched, basically beta-versions of
>>> CUCM, CUPS, CUCCX, when on other days we can install patches to get
>>> around bugs?
>>> Why on this day do I have to fly all the way to Raleigh and start the
>>> test at 7:15AM, when the guys who go to San Jose get to sleep in and
>>> take their test at 9:00?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>> If you are Jewish, those are funny.
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Ravindra Lakpriya
>> +94 773 532 094
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vmware proble help!

[Jason Granat]

I sometimes have this problem after redrafting the Windows host server. I have 
a fix that works fir me. It will sound hoky but it works. To fix I make a 
change to the network mappings in the VMWare network utility, refresh network 
settings in the admin web page, put the changes back in the network utility and 
refresh network settings again. I know it's hoky but it's been working for me 
and I have been too busy to look for a real fix.

Sent while mobile

On Aug 26, 2009, at 14:32, c george 
mailto:cisco...@hotmail.com>> wrote:

vmware wks 5.3 then I downloaded vmware server 2.0.

It is installed ontop of window 2003 enterprise.

wks 5 was working then just like that it stopped. I think it all happened right 
after installing IE 7

so then i uninstalled wks and installed server 2.0 same issue. Cannot connect 
to gw when installing ccm 7.

Respectfully Charles George




From:  d...@bestoftnt.com
To:  
cisco...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vmware proble help!
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:22:29 -0500
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; 
 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

What versions of VMWare and host os? Try the latest download. If you
have firewalls let the VMWare binaries thru

Regards,
Dale



Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online. Find out 
more.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME After Hours Override

[Jason Granat]

Ahh, I did use the 7-24 parameter. I'll try manually specifying time periods. I 
wish the Cisco docs mentioned that. I looked in both the admin guide and the 
command ref...

Thx!

Sent while mobile

On Aug 21, 2009, at 23:10, Cristi Radescu 
mailto:cristian.rade...@crescendo.ro>> wrote:

How did you configure the block pattern?
If you defined it with option „7-24” (after-hours block pattern pattern-tag 
pattern [7-24]) that pattern will not be overrided by code.


From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jason Granat
Sent: 22 august 2009 04:30
To: 'OSL Group'
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME After Hours Override

Hi all,

I am having trouble with what I thought should be a simple task. In CME I 
created an after hours block pattern, which works. I also configured an after 
hours override but this is not working. What is the best way to troubleshoot 
this?

Thanks,

Jason




<http://slash128.com>http://slash128.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME After Hours Override

[Jason Granat]

Hi all,

I am having trouble with what I thought should be a simple task. In CME I 
created an after hours block pattern, which works. I also configured an after 
hours override but this is not working. What is the best way to troubleshoot 
this?

Thanks,

Jason




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Exact version of UCM 7 for the version 3 lab.

[Jason Granat]

Just a note... If you are running on a Mac you can use Firefox to get around 
this. Works great.

Sent while mobile

On Aug 20, 2009, at 22:24, Tanner Ezell 
mailto:tanner.ez...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Turns out this is a non-issue. UCM just hates Safari.

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Aamir Panjwani 
<aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au>
 wrote:

Interesting…try rebooting it or build it from scratch ☺







From: Tanner Ezell 
[mailto:tanner.ez...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 21 August 2009 3:14 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc:  
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Exact version of UCM 7 for the version 3 lab.



I only have a single server in my cluster at the moment.

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Aamir Panjwani 
<aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au>
 wrote:

Yep I am running the same version.



SSH into pub cli and do “utils dbreplication status” to make sure it’s all good 
because I also had weird issues until I fixed replication







From:  
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
 On Behalf Of Tanner Ezell
Sent: Friday, 21 August 2009 3:05 PM
To:  
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Exact version of UCM 7 for the version 3 lab.



Does anyone know what version is being used. I currently have 7.0.1.11000-2 
installed and it is pissing me off to no end. I cannot even properly add a 
gateway. I'm hoping this version isn't being used, and if it is, and anyone 
else using this version, have this same issue?

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit  
http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit  
http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit  
http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit  
http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Feature Request for BLS Videos

[Jason Granat]

Hi Wayne,

Saw the flurry regarding the new VoD updates. Any details on what you alluded 
to below?

Thanks!

Jason

From: Wayne Lawson [mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 2:06 PM
To: 'Larry Hadrava'; Jason Granat
Cc: 'OSL Group'; 'Mark Snow'; 'Vik Malhi'; 'David Kaufman'
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Feature Request for BLS Videos

Larry - we're working on several things that will resolve this! ;-)

Regards,

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder & President - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
Mobile: +1.810.334.1564




From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 4:43 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: OSL Group; Mark Snow; Vik Malhi; Wayne Lawson; David Kaufman
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Feature Request for BLS Videos

Jason:

Thank you for your input. I will forward these suggestions up the ladder and we 
will see what we can do.

Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Jason Granat 
mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:

I travel a lot so I do a LOT of studying in the car and on planes, waiting in 
airports, etc. I like to load up my iPhone with MP3 recordings of study 
material. With the IPExpert BLS this has been challenging. I know we get the 
handful of audio files but I would really like to listen to the audio portion 
of all the workbook videos, etc. I started to convert the video files from the 
hard drive but I noticed there are duplicates and there isn't a meaningful 
naming convention for me to sort them.



Is it at all possible to either: 1) export the audio from all the video AND/OR 
2) export all the videos in iPhone/portable format. While this second option 
wouldn't necessarily be very 'viewable' it would at least facilitate the audio 
in the car, which is my primary goal.



If neither of these are possible then a last resort would be to just have the 
files named to match the content so I could bulk export them myself...



I would find this highly valuable!



Thanks,



Jason




http://slash128.com<http://slash128.com/>

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.45/2287 - Release Date: 08/07/09 
06:22:00




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Great Website

[Jason Granat]

The author of the CUPS book I posted about earlier has a great
website. Lots of info about virtualization of UC components and lots
of other good stuff:

http://htluo.blogspot.com/


Sent while mobile



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Performance of vmware in SSD Harddisk

[Jason Granat]

Also, a thought on using VM, if they are indeed running it in the lab
for candidates then I would imagine that there shouldn't be any issues
preventing us from running it successfully, unless they have some
special tweaks that we can't get to :-)

Sent while mobile

On Aug 8, 2009, at 9:02, Jason Granat  wrote:

> I havent tries SSDs, but I tried 15K drives over 7200 and there was a
> noticeable difference, but not worth the $1k cost for 4 of them. I
> went back to 7200. I don't get the lag that you seem to experience. My
> VMs come up and are accessible in a few minutes.  The main lag I was
> trying to overcome is the response of my MS Exchange 07 auto
> attendant. Her voice gets choppy and perfmon shows the drives going
> crazy. The 15k drives improved this quite a bit but I don't have the
> problem with Unity so it wasn't worth it at this point. I run RAID5.
> For performance reference My VM server pull multi duty. Not only is
> this my voice lab server but for customer demos I also run CSAMC
> (Win2k3), CSM (Win2k3), NAC Appliance (1 manager and 1 server), LMS
> (Win2k3), MS Exchange 07, an XP Client, and a Linux server. All of
> these are VMs on the same host box and the only performance issue I
> have is the one noted above with choppy MS Exchange AA.
>
> Sent while mobile
>
> On Aug 8, 2009, at 8:47, Chris Parker  wrote:
>
>> It may help but you really need raid 1+0 to see a big improvement ssd
>> drives are really pricey I'm sure you could get the four drives you'd
>> need for raid for less money
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2009, at 10:54 AM, So Gwaai  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd just want to know if any significance improvement when I move my
>>> vmware based (vmware workstation 6.5) CUC from the SATA harddisk to
>>> SSD harddisk? Since I need to wait more than 10 min to get the GUI
>>> login prompt after the CLI prompt appear...
>>>
>>> Thanks for any help
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> http://slash128.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Performance of vmware in SSD Harddisk

[Jason Granat]

I havent tries SSDs, but I tried 15K drives over 7200 and there was a
noticeable difference, but not worth the $1k cost for 4 of them. I
went back to 7200. I don't get the lag that you seem to experience. My
VMs come up and are accessible in a few minutes.  The main lag I was
trying to overcome is the response of my MS Exchange 07 auto
attendant. Her voice gets choppy and perfmon shows the drives going
crazy. The 15k drives improved this quite a bit but I don't have the
problem with Unity so it wasn't worth it at this point. I run RAID5.
For performance reference My VM server pull multi duty. Not only is
this my voice lab server but for customer demos I also run CSAMC
(Win2k3), CSM (Win2k3), NAC Appliance (1 manager and 1 server), LMS
(Win2k3), MS Exchange 07, an XP Client, and a Linux server. All of
these are VMs on the same host box and the only performance issue I
have is the one noted above with choppy MS Exchange AA.

Sent while mobile

On Aug 8, 2009, at 8:47, Chris Parker  wrote:

> It may help but you really need raid 1+0 to see a big improvement ssd
> drives are really pricey I'm sure you could get the four drives you'd
> need for raid for less money
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 8, 2009, at 10:54 AM, So Gwaai  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd just want to know if any significance improvement when I move my
>> vmware based (vmware workstation 6.5) CUC from the SATA harddisk to
>> SSD harddisk? Since I need to wait more than 10 min to get the GUI
>> login prompt after the CLI prompt appear...
>>
>> Thanks for any help
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Good Cisco CUPS Book

[Jason Granat]

Haha that's awesome :-)

Sent while mobile

On Aug 7, 2009, at 20:19, ccie8340tx 
mailto:ccie834...@gmail.com>> wrote:

jason,

thanks.
I have added to my shopping cart.

best part is as you read this book and become more knowledgeable, the book goes 
up in value..

yes...-)

10 
new<http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0557039533/ref=dp_olp_new?ie=UTF8&qid=1249697182&sr=8-3&condition=new>
 from $20.65 3 
used<http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0557039533/ref=dp_olp_used?ie=UTF8&qid=1249697182&sr=8-3&condition=used>
 from $28.13

cheers,Padhu

- Original Message -
From: Jason Granat<mailto:j...@slash128.com>
To: OSL Group<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 9:09 PM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Good Cisco CUPS Book

I think someone else posted a recommendation for this book not too long ago. I 
also purchased it on Amazon and received it today. I am no Presence expert but 
I have run through some lab scenarios and from my limited experience I would 
say this book looks very good! It even has an extensive troubleshooting section 
and goes over OCS/MOC integration.

Just wanted to pass on the recommendation if it is useful to anyone else. For a 
$20 and free shipping I say it is well worth it…

<http://www.amazon.com/Deploying-Cisco-Unified-Presence-HouTong/dp/0557039533/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1249697182&sr=8-3>http://www.amazon.com/Deploying-Cisco-Unified-Presence-HouTong/dp/0557039533/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1249697182&sr=8-3





http://slash128.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
<http://www.ipexpert.com> www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
<http://www.ipexpert.com> www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Good Cisco CUPS Book

[Jason Granat]

Yeah, the 'building block' approach is what I really like about this book. I 
wish there were books on other technologies written in the same fashion. I 
think I would buy that whole library. Cisco documentation is good but often 
overwhelming with all the details. This book is nice with its succinctness and 
pointed troubleshooting like "if you have problem 'X' look for solution 'Y'"

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 7:33 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Good Cisco CUPS Book

Yeah, I got it last week... the English could use some work, but it
isn't bad... definitely provides more info than Cisco (that is sooo
hard to accomplish...)

I am curious as to why Cisco is incapable of writing building-block
documentation...

e.g.:

For a basic install (CUPS to CCM for use with CUPC) do this...
To add X to the install, do this
To add Y to the install, do this...

Maybe if they did, CCIEs wouldn't be worth anything...

Makes you wonder if they have doco meetings where some guy says, 'hey,
don't tell them how to make MWI work, we want our CCIEs to do that!"



J

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Jason Granat wrote:
> I think someone else posted a recommendation for this book not too long ago.
> I also purchased it on Amazon and received it today. I am no Presence expert
> but I have run through some lab scenarios and from my limited experience I
> would say this book looks very good! It even has an extensive
> troubleshooting section and goes over OCS/MOC integration.
>
>
>
> Just wanted to pass on the recommendation if it is useful to anyone else.
> For a $20 and free shipping I say it is well worth it...
>
>
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Deploying-Cisco-Unified-Presence-HouTong/dp/0557039533/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1249697182&sr=8-3
>
>
>
> 
>
> http://slash128.com
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Good Cisco CUPS Book

[Jason Granat]

I think someone else posted a recommendation for this book not too long ago. I 
also purchased it on Amazon and received it today. I am no Presence expert but 
I have run through some lab scenarios and from my limited experience I would 
say this book looks very good! It even has an extensive troubleshooting section 
and goes over OCS/MOC integration.

Just wanted to pass on the recommendation if it is useful to anyone else. For a 
$20 and free shipping I say it is well worth it...

http://www.amazon.com/Deploying-Cisco-Unified-Presence-HouTong/dp/0557039533/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1249697182&sr=8-3





http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Feature Request for BLS Videos

[Jason Granat]

Yes, thanks all! This would be fantastic As always, IPExpert ROCKS :)

From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 2:30 PM
To: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
Cc: Jason Granat; OSL Group; Mark Snow; Vik Malhi; David Kaufman
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Feature Request for BLS Videos

Thanks Wayne

Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Wayne Lawson 
mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com>> wrote:

Larry - we're working on several things that will resolve this! ;-)



Regards,



Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244

Founder & President - IPexpert, Inc.

Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com<mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com>

Mobile: +1.810.334.1564









From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com<mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com>]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 4:43 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: OSL Group; Mark Snow; Vik Malhi; Wayne Lawson; David Kaufman

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Feature Request for BLS Videos



Jason:



Thank you for your input. I will forward these suggestions up the ladder and we 
will see what we can do.

Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Jason Granat 
mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:

I travel a lot so I do a LOT of studying in the car and on planes, waiting in 
airports, etc. I like to load up my iPhone with MP3 recordings of study 
material. With the IPExpert BLS this has been challenging. I know we get the 
handful of audio files but I would really like to listen to the audio portion 
of all the workbook videos, etc. I started to convert the video files from the 
hard drive but I noticed there are duplicates and there isn't a meaningful 
naming convention for me to sort them.



Is it at all possible to either: 1) export the audio from all the video AND/OR 
2) export all the videos in iPhone/portable format. While this second option 
wouldn't necessarily be very 'viewable' it would at least facilitate the audio 
in the car, which is my primary goal.



If neither of these are possible then a last resort would be to just have the 
files named to match the content so I could bulk export them myself...



I would find this highly valuable!



Thanks,



Jason






http://slash128.com<http://slash128.com/>

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com/>
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.45/2287 - Release Date: 08/07/09 
06:22:00





http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Feature Request for BLS Videos

[Jason Granat]

I travel a lot so I do a LOT of studying in the car and on planes, waiting in 
airports, etc. I like to load up my iPhone with MP3 recordings of study 
material. With the IPExpert BLS this has been challenging. I know we get the 
handful of audio files but I would really like to listen to the audio portion 
of all the workbook videos, etc. I started to convert the video files from the 
hard drive but I noticed there are duplicates and there isn't a meaningful 
naming convention for me to sort them.

Is it at all possible to either: 1) export the audio from all the video AND/OR 
2) export all the videos in iPhone/portable format. While this second option 
wouldn't necessarily be very 'viewable' it would at least facilitate the audio 
in the car, which is my primary goal.

If neither of these are possible then a last resort would be to just have the 
files named to match the content so I could bulk export them myself...

I would find this highly valuable!

Thanks,

Jason




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Workbook

[Jason Granat]

I didn't see them when they first came out either but support got them posted 
for me.

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 8:26 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Workbook

I haven't seen ANY of the volume 2 workbooks

J

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Jason Granat wrote:
> Has anyone seen any more of the Vol2 workbooks posted? I only have Lab 1 & 2
> WB & PG. Just wanted to make sure I didn't miss anything...
>
> 
>
> http://slash128.com
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Workbook

[Jason Granat]

Ok, thanks. I thought so, just wasn’t sure…

From: Wayne Lawson [mailto:groupst...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 8:09 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Workbook

Jason - we only have 2 of the Vol 2 labs available.

Regards,

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder & President - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com<mailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com>
Mobile: +1.810.334.1564

:: Message sent from iPhone.

On Aug 6, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Jason Granat 
mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:
Has anyone seen any more of the Vol2 workbooks posted? I only have Lab 1 & 2 WB 
& PG. Just wanted to make sure I didn’t miss anything…




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Workbook

[Jason Granat]

Has anyone seen any more of the Vol2 workbooks posted? I only have Lab 1 & 2 WB 
& PG. Just wanted to make sure I didn't miss anything...




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-CUE and 2801

[Jason Granat]

Hope that didn't sound too short. I was just excited to post an answer to a 
question here that I finally knew the answer to :-)

Sent while mobile

On Aug 6, 2009, at 17:53, Jason Granat 
mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:

If you scroll down to table 10 it shows that the only CUE module supported on 
the 2801 is the AIM-CUE.

Sent while mobile

On Aug 6, 2009, at 17:26, Brian Valentine 
<<mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com>bkvalent...@gmail.com<mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com>>
 wrote:

Am I missing something?  The CUE Compatibility matrix says that the NM-CUE is 
supported on 2801.  Since the 2801 doesn’t have network modules, should I 
assume this is a mistake?
<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity_exp/compatibility/cuecomp.htm><http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity_exp/compatibility/cuecomp.htm>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity_exp/compatibility/cuecomp.htm
Brian
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
<http://www.ipexpert.com> <http://www.ipexpert.com> 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>




<http://slash128.com>http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
<http://www.ipexpert.com> www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-CUE and 2801

[Jason Granat]

If you scroll down to table 10 it shows that the only CUE module supported on 
the 2801 is the AIM-CUE.

Sent while mobile

On Aug 6, 2009, at 17:26, Brian Valentine 
mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Am I missing something?  The CUE Compatibility matrix says that the NM-CUE is 
supported on 2801.  Since the 2801 doesn’t have network modules, should I 
assume this is a mistake?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity_exp/compatibility/cuecomp.htm
Brian
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] OT: Mac and Cisco work

[Jason Granat]

Oh and Safari has problems with most of the web GUIs for CUCM and such
but Firefox works great.

Sent while mobile

On Aug 1, 2009, at 20:04, Jason Granat  wrote:

> For console access I installed Minicom and use an IOGear USB to serial
> adapter. For TFTP etc., since MacOS has a Linux/UNIX I would imagine
> you can find the usual daemons.
>
> Sent while mobile
>
> On Aug 1, 2009, at 18:19, Tim Smith  wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Does anyone have any good tips on native mac software apps to help
>> get my cisco / networking work done?
>>
>> I've just converted from PC last month. I'm running fusion with all
>> my old windows based tools at the moment. But looking to see what is
>> available on the mac.
>>
>> In particular..
>>
>> TFTP / SFTP / FTP servers?
>> Syslog?
>> Visio
>> Best hardware USB > Serial converter? (I have a Targus PA088 that
>> works in VMWare, but havent been able to get it going in OSX)
>> Any other good suggestions?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Tim.
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> http://slash128.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] OT: Mac and Cisco work

[Jason Granat]

For console access I installed Minicom and use an IOGear USB to serial
adapter. For TFTP etc., since MacOS has a Linux/UNIX I would imagine
you can find the usual daemons.

Sent while mobile

On Aug 1, 2009, at 18:19, Tim Smith  wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> Does anyone have any good tips on native mac software apps to help
> get my cisco / networking work done?
>
> I've just converted from PC last month. I'm running fusion with all
> my old windows based tools at the moment. But looking to see what is
> available on the mac.
>
> In particular..
>
> TFTP / SFTP / FTP servers?
> Syslog?
> Visio
> Best hardware USB > Serial converter? (I have a Targus PA088 that
> works in VMWare, but havent been able to get it going in OSX)
> Any other good suggestions?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim.
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3

[Jason Granat]

Oh, ok :-)

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 1:41 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: Vik Malhi; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3

This was not even slightly directed at you...

I got at least 30 emails privately asking me for a point by point
braindump of the exam.


Jonathan

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Jason Granat wrote:
> I just asked how the IPExpert workbooks compared. I wasn't asking for 
> specifics. Sorry if I offended you.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 1:29 PM
> To: Vik Malhi
> Cc: Jason Granat; OSL Group
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3
>
> Your welcome, though I would like to reply to the entire group:
>
> Stop asking me what is specifically on the test.
>
> I am not going to tell you
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Vik Malhi wrote:
>> Thanks for sharing the info Jonathan.
>>
>> From what we heard at networkers during the techtorial we believe we are
>> missing a few technologies too and we have been working hard to incorporate
>> anything that is currently lacking into our WB.
>>
>> I don't want to be cryptic and it is unfair to ask DIRECT questions to
>> somebody who has recently sat the lab although I'm sure you all want a
>> braindump from Jonathan:-) JK.
>>
>> --
>> Vik Malhi  CCIE #13890
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
>> Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>> Join our free online support and peer group communities:
>> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
>> IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand
>> and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE
>> Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage
>> Lab Certifications.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: Jonathan Charles 
>>> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:06:13 -0500
>>> To: Jason Granat 
>>> Cc: OSL Group 
>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3
>>>
>>> The Volume 1 workbook was good, but was missing something very
>>> important (perhaps, sort of... could be, maybe)  which will
>>> supposedly be in volume 2...
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Jason Granat wrote:
>>>> Maybe you could give us your opinion on how much you think the IPExpert
>>>> Workbooks helped prepare you?
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>>>> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan 
>>>> Charles
>>>> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 10:21 AM
>>>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3
>>>>
>>>> OK, I took it monday in San Jose and failed (got a nice email from Ben
>>>> Ng telling me why...)
>>>>
>>>> It was actually easier than I thought it was going to be... and
>>>> remarkably fair...
>>>>
>>>> I made a mistake that broke something and that is the primary reason I
>>>> didn't pass (no, I cannot tell you what the mistake was, or even what
>>>> was broken...).
>>>>
>>>> I will say the exam was not what I expected (nope, can't tell you what
>>>> I expected it to be...)
>>>>
>>>> I am retaking it 9/1 in RTP
>>>>
>>>> And for even less information, see http://www.cisco.com/go/ccie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan
>>>> ___
>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://slash128.com
>>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> http://slash128.com
>



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3

[Jason Granat]

I just asked how the IPExpert workbooks compared. I wasn't asking for 
specifics. Sorry if I offended you.

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 1:29 PM
To: Vik Malhi
Cc: Jason Granat; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3

Your welcome, though I would like to reply to the entire group:

Stop asking me what is specifically on the test.

I am not going to tell you




Jonathan

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Vik Malhi wrote:
> Thanks for sharing the info Jonathan.
>
> From what we heard at networkers during the techtorial we believe we are
> missing a few technologies too and we have been working hard to incorporate
> anything that is currently lacking into our WB.
>
> I don't want to be cryptic and it is unfair to ask DIRECT questions to
> somebody who has recently sat the lab although I'm sure you all want a
> braindump from Jonathan:-) JK.
>
> --
> Vik Malhi  CCIE #13890
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
>
>
> Join our free online support and peer group communities:
> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
> IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand
> and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE
> Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage
> Lab Certifications.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> From: Jonathan Charles 
>> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:06:13 -0500
>> To: Jason Granat 
>> Cc: OSL Group 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3
>>
>> The Volume 1 workbook was good, but was missing something very
>> important (perhaps, sort of... could be, maybe)  which will
>> supposedly be in volume 2...
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Jason Granat wrote:
>>> Maybe you could give us your opinion on how much you think the IPExpert
>>> Workbooks helped prepare you?
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>>> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan 
>>> Charles
>>> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 10:21 AM
>>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3
>>>
>>> OK, I took it monday in San Jose and failed (got a nice email from Ben
>>> Ng telling me why...)
>>>
>>> It was actually easier than I thought it was going to be... and
>>> remarkably fair...
>>>
>>> I made a mistake that broke something and that is the primary reason I
>>> didn't pass (no, I cannot tell you what the mistake was, or even what
>>> was broken...).
>>>
>>> I will say the exam was not what I expected (nope, can't tell you what
>>> I expected it to be...)
>>>
>>> I am retaking it 9/1 in RTP
>>>
>>> And for even less information, see http://www.cisco.com/go/ccie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://slash128.com
>>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3

[Jason Granat]

Thanks! This is actually very good to hear! Have you gone through the Vol2 labs 
yet to see if they are more 'complete'? :-)

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 11:06 AM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3

The Volume 1 workbook was good, but was missing something very
important (perhaps, sort of... could be, maybe)  which will
supposedly be in volume 2...


Jonathan

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Jason Granat wrote:
> Maybe you could give us your opinion on how much you think the IPExpert 
> Workbooks helped prepare you?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 10:21 AM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3
>
> OK, I took it monday in San Jose and failed (got a nice email from Ben
> Ng telling me why...)
>
> It was actually easier than I thought it was going to be... and
> remarkably fair...
>
> I made a mistake that broke something and that is the primary reason I
> didn't pass (no, I cannot tell you what the mistake was, or even what
> was broken...).
>
> I will say the exam was not what I expected (nope, can't tell you what
> I expected it to be...)
>
> I am retaking it 9/1 in RTP
>
> And for even less information, see http://www.cisco.com/go/ccie
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> http://slash128.com
>



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 and Videos?

[Jason Granat]

I hope those of us that purchased the old BLS are entitled to the new material 
until we pass:



http://www.ipexpert.com/Guarantee



This is one of the big reasons I use IPExpert (that and of course they rock :))





-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 7:34 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 and Videos?



Were they supposed to be out today?



Also, if those of us with pre-existing BLS are not entitled to the new

material, how do we go about getting the upgrade?







Jonathan

___

For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home Lab Questions

[Jason Granat]

Good tip, thx!

Sent while mobile

On Jul 29, 2009, at 13:36, Nara Shikamaru 
mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com>> wrote:

You will need 2 qty PVDM2/16 for each branch router.  The lab module on 
hardware conference bridging will require it and the single PVDM2/16 will not 
allow you to configure any sessions after your VWIC is up.

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Jason Granat 
<<mailto:j...@slash128.com>j...@slash128.com<mailto:j...@slash128.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

I know this has been discussed alot but I wanted to ask a couple
questions about home lab gear. I currently have the following:

Dell 2900 Dual Quad Core with 24G RAM and plenty of fast storage
running NFR 7 kit pub/sub, unity cxn, presence, uccx all no problem. I
am also running MS AD for integration when that comes.

2 x 2811 w/PVDM2-16
1 x AIM-CUE
1 x HWIC-9ESW
1 x 3745 w/ 30DSP AIM
2 x VWIC-2MFT-T1
2 x VWIC-1MFT-E1 (actually I believe one is combo E1/T1)
2 x 3750
1 x 2520 for FRSW
1 x 3620 w/16 con port for term srv
10 x 7960

I know I need to get some newer phones. My main question is about PSTN
router, which I don't have at this point. Should I repurpose the 3745
as PSTN and add a 2801/2811 or what are thoughts here? Any other
recommendations?

I also have a UC520. Maybe I could use that for a branch gateway/UCME/
CUE and repurpose 3745 as PSTN? Only problem with this is it is
currently serving as home phone system so wife and kids will be mad if
I take it away :-)

Thanks,

Jason





Sent while mobile



<http://slash128.com/>http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
<http://www.ipexpert.com/> www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>



--
-Shikamaru




http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home Lab Questions

[Jason Granat]

Thanks for the advice. I think it's probably best to find a third 2800
and use the 3745 as PSTN...

Sent while mobile

On Jul 28, 2009, at 15:49, "Hough, Earl"  wrote:

> I believe there is a limitation on the UC520 that you can't do a T1
> Data kind of connection.  I also believe there are several other
> limitations as this model is sort of a dumbed-down version of the
> full IOS in order to allow for all the features to be enabled on a
> single platform.
>
> Earl Hough CCIE #16508 (R&S/Security)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-
> boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jason Granat
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 6:16 PM
> To: Jason Granat
> Cc: CCIE Voice Maillist
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home Lab Questions
>
> Thanks for the responses. Any thoughts on using a UC520 as a branch
> gateway?
>
> Sent while mobile
>
> On Jul 28, 2009, at 11:57, Jason Granat  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I know this has been discussed alot but I wanted to ask a couple
>> questions about home lab gear. I currently have the following:
>>
>> Dell 2900 Dual Quad Core with 24G RAM and plenty of fast storage
>> running NFR 7 kit pub/sub, unity cxn, presence, uccx all no
>> problem. I
>> am also running MS AD for integration when that comes.
>>
>> 2 x 2811 w/PVDM2-16
>> 1 x AIM-CUE
>> 1 x HWIC-9ESW
>> 1 x 3745 w/ 30DSP AIM
>> 2 x VWIC-2MFT-T1
>> 2 x VWIC-1MFT-E1 (actually I believe one is combo E1/T1)
>> 2 x 3750
>> 1 x 2520 for FRSW
>> 1 x 3620 w/16 con port for term srv
>> 10 x 7960
>>
>> I know I need to get some newer phones. My main question is about
>> PSTN
>> router, which I don't have at this point. Should I repurpose the 3745
>> as PSTN and add a 2801/2811 or what are thoughts here? Any other
>> recommendations?
>>
>> I also have a UC520. Maybe I could use that for a branch gateway/
>> UCME/
>> CUE and repurpose 3745 as PSTN? Only problem with this is it is
>> currently serving as home phone system so wife and kids will be mad
>> if
>> I take it away :-)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent while mobile
>>
>>
>>
>> http://slash128.com
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> http://slash128.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> _ _ _
>
> The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
> intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
> whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further
> distribution is
> not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing
> by
> SARCOM, Inc. Furthermore, SARCOM, Inc. is not responsible for
> the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
> communication, nor for any delay in its receipt.
>
>



http://slash128.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com