[OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping

2010-08-03 Thread Stutz, Bernhard
Hi all,
 
In Proctorlabs there is always mentioned that the QOS SRND provides a adequate 
example for class-based shaping but i can't find them. 
 
Also i heard rumors that the QOS SRND document provided at the labs is not at 
Cisco Website available anymore. However i can find a version here: 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/QoS_SRND/QoS-SRND-Book.html
 
but i can't find there an example for class-based shaping. Does anyone know 
where i can find such a adequate example?
 
good luck and have fun in your studies,
Bernhard
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping

2010-08-03 Thread Daniel Berlinski
Hello there

Check this path in the SRND
WAN Aggregator QoS Design - WAN Edge Link-Specific QoS Design - Frame Relay
- Slow-Speed (£ 768 kbps) Frame Relay Links, then turn the page and you will
find it.

HTH


On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Stutz, Bernhard  wrote:

>  Hi all,
>
> In Proctorlabs there is always mentioned that the QOS SRND provides a
> adequate example for class-based shaping but i can't find them.
>
> Also i heard rumors that the QOS SRND document provided at the labs is not
> at Cisco Website available anymore. However i can find a version here:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/QoS_SRND/QoS-SRND-Book.html
>
> but i can't find there an example for class-based shaping. Does anyone know
> where i can find such a adequate example?
>
> good luck and have fun in your studies,
> Bernhard
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping

2010-08-03 Thread CCIE Voice GMAIL
Has anyone figured out how to access this through the documentation site?
I’ve been using the search function and looking through all of the menus
without any luck.  

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Daniel
Berlinski
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 2:33 PM
To: Stutz, Bernhard
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping

 

Hello there

Check this path in the SRND
WAN Aggregator QoS Design - WAN Edge Link-Specific QoS Design - Frame Relay
- Slow-Speed (£ 768 kbps) Frame Relay Links, then turn the page and you will
find it.

HTH



On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Stutz, Bernhard  wrote:

Hi all,

 

In Proctorlabs there is always mentioned that the QOS SRND provides a
adequate example for class-based shaping but i can't find them. 

 

Also i heard rumors that the QOS SRND document provided at the labs is not
at Cisco Website available anymore. However i can find a version here: 

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/QoS_SRND/Qo
S-SRND-Book.html

 

but i can't find there an example for class-based shaping. Does anyone know
where i can find such a adequate example?

 

good luck and have fun in your studies,

Bernhard


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping

2010-08-03 Thread bkvalent...@gmail.com
I believe the qos srnd is provided on the computer's desktop in off format  
when you take the lab exam.  No need to find it through the web interface.  

- Reply message -
From: "CCIE Voice GMAIL" 
Date: Tue, Aug 3, 2010 6:02 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping
To: 

Has anyone figured out how to access this through the documentation site?
I’ve been using the search function and looking through all of the menus
without any luck.  

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Daniel
Berlinski
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 2:33 PM
To: Stutz, Bernhard
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping

 

Hello there

Check this path in the SRND
WAN Aggregator QoS Design - WAN Edge Link-Specific QoS Design - Frame Relay
- Slow-Speed (£ 768 kbps) Frame Relay Links, then turn the page and you will
find it.

HTH



On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Stutz, Bernhard  wrote:

Hi all,

 

In Proctorlabs there is always mentioned that the QOS SRND provides a
adequate example for class-based shaping but i can't find them. 

 

Also i heard rumors that the QOS SRND document provided at the labs is not
at Cisco Website available anymore. However i can find a version here: 

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/QoS_SRND/Qo
S-SRND-Book.html

 

but i can't find there an example for class-based shaping. Does anyone know
where i can find such a adequate example?

 

good luck and have fun in your studies,

Bernhard


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping

2010-08-03 Thread CCIE Voice GMAIL
Thanks. 

 

From: bkvalent...@gmail.com [mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:19 PM
To: CCIE Voice GMAIL; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping

 

I believe the qos srnd is provided on the computer's desktop in off format  
when you take the lab exam.  No need to find it through the web interface.  

- Reply message -
From: "CCIE Voice GMAIL" 
Date: Tue, Aug 3, 2010 6:02 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping
To: 

Has anyone figured out how to access this through the documentation site?
I’ve been using the search function and looking through all of the menus
without any luck.  





From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Daniel
Berlinski
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 2:33 PM
To: Stutz, Bernhard
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping



Hello there

Check this path in the SRND
WAN Aggregator QoS Design - WAN Edge Link-Specific QoS Design - Frame Relay
- Slow-Speed (£ 768 kbps) Frame Relay Links, then turn the page and you will
find it.

HTH



On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Stutz, Bernhard  wrote:

Hi all,



In Proctorlabs there is always mentioned that the QOS SRND provides a
adequate example for class-based shaping but i can't find them. 



Also i heard rumors that the QOS SRND document provided at the labs is not
at Cisco Website available anymore. However i can find a version here: 

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/QoS_SRND/Qo
S-SRND-Book.html



but i can't find there an example for class-based shaping. Does anyone know
where i can find such a adequate example?



good luck and have fun in your studies,

Bernhard


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com






___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] class based shaping and cRTP

2010-02-27 Thread Mark Nigh
Can anyone check out my configuration of class based shaping and class based 
cRTP. Seems that I can't get the compression to increment when I configure 
class based shaping. When I use MLPPP and cRTP, it increments.

Thanks for your assistance.

class-map match-any signal
 match ip dscp af31
 match ip dscp cs3  af31
class-map match-any voice
 match ip dscp ef
 match protocol rtp
!
!
policy-map WAN-EDGE
 class voice
priority percent 33
   compress header ip rtp
 class signal
priority percent 5
policy-map cbase-shaping
 class class-default
shape average 368400 3684 0
  service-policy WAN-EDGE

interface Serial0/0/0
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF
 ip ospf mtu-ignore
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface Serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
 ip address 10.6.255.254 255.255.255.252
 ip ospf mtu-ignore
 snmp trap link-status
 frame-relay interface-dlci 201
  class fr-map-class

map-class frame-relay fr-map-class
 frame-relay fragment 480
 frame-relay fair-queue
 service-policy output cbase-shaping

SHOW COMMOND

R2#sh policy-map int
 Serial0/0/0.1: DLCI 201 -

  Service-policy output: cbase-shaping

Class-map: class-default (match-any)
  11179 packets, 717408 bytes
  5 minute offered rate 25000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
  Match: any
  Queueing
  queue limit 64 packets
  (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
  (pkts output/bytes output) 11179/717408
  shape (average) cir 368400, bc 3684, be 0
  target shape rate 368400
lower bound cir 0,  adapt to fecn 0

  Service-policy : WAN-EDGE

queue stats for all priority classes:
  Queueing
  queue limit 64 packets
  (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
  (pkts output/bytes output) 11014/704896

Class-map: voice (match-any)
  11014 packets, 704896 bytes   ** These packets increment.
  5 minute offered rate 25000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
  Match: ip dscp ef (46)
1640 packets, 104960 bytes
5 minute rate 0 bps
  Match: protocol rtp
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute rate 0 bps
  Priority: 33% (121 kbps), burst bytes 3000, b/w exceed drops: 0

  compress:   * I get nothing on this.
  header ip rtp
  UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)
Sent:0 total, 0 compressed,
 0 bytes saved, 0 bytes sent
 rate 0 bps

Mark Nigh
Systems Engineer
mn...@netelligent.com
 (p) 314.392.6926
[cid:image001.gif@01CAB7B1.273BDF10]



This transmission and any attached files are privileged, confidential or 
otherwise the exclusive property of the intended recipient or Netelligent 
Corporation. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this 
transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please contact us immediately by responding to this message or by 
telephone (314-392-6900) and promptly destroy the original transmission and its 
attachments.
<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] class based shaping and MLPoFR

2008-09-29 Thread jonny vegas
Apparently the above config does not work.

That is to say MLP and class based shaping are not compatible

Config could look something like one of the following.

policy-map NO-GOOD
class data
shape blah blah

virtual-template x
service-policy out NO-GOOD

or like this

policy-map NO-GOOD
class data
shape blah blah

int s 0/0/0.100
frame-real intf-dlci virt-temp 100
class FR-CLASS-SHAPE

map-class FR-CLASS-SHAPE
service-policy out NO-GOOD

Clearly the above are just a representation and designed to illustrate the
point.

Does anyone have a decent reference which explains the details as to why the
above do not function.

Thanks


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping with compression

2010-10-14 Thread natan 2me
Hello, there are 2 old posts on that topic - I did follow them, however.

With bellow config on my 2 rtrs the CRTP 'show policy-map int' counter still
shows ZERO. I reloaded, reapplied. Pls have a look and advice for the
direction... thanks! There is match on the voice class. IOS is 12.4(20)T.
Thanks!@@

class-map match-all Voice
 match ip dscp ef

class-map match-any Signaling
 match ip dscp cs3
 match ip dscp af31

policy-map WAN-EDGE
 class Voice
  priority 24
   compress header ip rtp
 class Signaling
  bandwidth 18
 class class-default
  fair-queue

policy-map MQC-FRTS-768
 class class-default
  shape average 364800 3648 0
  service-policy WAN-EDGE

map-class frame-relay FR-MAP-CLASS-768
 frame-relay fragment 480
 service-policy output MQC-FRTS-768
!
interface Serial2/0.12 point-to-point
ip address 10.1.121.1 255.255.255.252
frame-relay interface-dlci 102
class FR-MAP-CLASS-768

---show policy-map int
-

do show policy-map int
 Serial0/2/0.1: DLCI 101 -

  Service-policy output: MQC-FRTS-768

Class-map: class-default (match-any)
  6913 packets, 445780 bytes
  5 minute offered rate 4000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
  Match: any
  Queueing
  queue limit 64 packets
  (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
  (pkts output/bytes output) 6913/445780
  shape (average) cir 364800, bc 3648, be 0
  target shape rate 364800
lower bound cir 0,  adapt to fecn 0

  Service-policy : WAN-EDGE

queue stats for all priority classes:
  Queueing
  queue limit 64 packets
  (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
  (pkts output/bytes output) 6655/425920

Class-map: Voice (match-all)
  6655 packets, 425920 bytes
  5 minute offered rate 4000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
  Match: ip dscp ef (46)
  Priority: 24 kbps, burst bytes 1500, b/w exceed drops: 0

  compress:
  header ip rtp
  UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)
Sent:0 total, 0 compressed,
 0 bytes saved, 0 bytes sent
 rate 0 bps


Class-map: Signaling (match-any)
  160 packets, 8360 bytes
  5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
  Match: ip dscp cs3 (24)
160 packets, 8360 bytes
5 minute rate 0 bps
  Match: ip dscp af31 (26)
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute rate 0 bps
  Queueing
  queue limit 64 packets
  (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
  (pkts output/bytes output) 160/8360
  bandwidth 18 kbps

Class-map: class-default (match-any)
  98 packets, 11500 bytes
  5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
  Match: any
  Queueing
  queue limit 64 packets
  (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops/flowdrops) 0/0/0/0
  (pkts output/bytes output) 98/11500
  Fair-queue: per-flow queue limit 16
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Class-Based Shaping Issue

2013-03-03 Thread Bill
Well it looks like it is picking up the RTP header compression, shaping and 
even the service policy but not doing it.

Have you tried rebooting the router or copy, delete then reapply ?


Sent from my iPad

On Mar 3, 2013, at 8:43 PM, Jason Lee  wrote:

> All,
> 
> Was wondering if I could get a second set of eyes on my Class Based Shaping 
> configuration.  I just implemented between SA and SB.  The same configuration 
> is used on both.  On SB I see the packets being captured in both policy maps. 
>  On SA I don't see traffic being captured in the nested policy-map containing 
> voice and signaling configuration.  Heres the output...
> 
> 
> r3800-2j-a(config)#do sh policy-map inter s0/2/0.1
>  Serial0/2/0.1: DLCI 201 -
> 
>   Service-policy output: shape-policy-map
> 
> Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>   3234 packets, 563006 bytes
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>   Match: any 
>   Queueing
>   queue limit 64 packets
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 3234/545846
>   shape (average) cir 384000, bc 3840, be 0
>   target shape rate 384000
> lower bound cir 0,  adapt to fecn 0
>   compress:
>   header ip rtp
>   UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)
> Sent:455 total, 452 compressed, 
>  17160 bytes saved, 10140 bytes sent
>  2.69 efficiency improvement factor
>  99% hit ratio, five minute miss rate 0 misses/sec, 0 max
>  rate 0 bps
>   
> 
>   Service-policy : llq
> 
> queue stats for all priority classes:
>   
>   queue limit 64 packets
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
> 
>  r3800-2j-a(config)#do sh policy-map inter s0/2/0.1
>  Serial0/2/0.1: DLCI 201 -
> 
>   Service-policy output: shape-policy-map
> 
> Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>   3234 packets, 563006 bytes
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>   Match: any 
>   Queueing
>   queue limit 64 packets
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 3234/545846
>   shape (average) cir 384000, bc 3840, be 0
>   target shape rate 384000
> lower bound cir 0,  adapt to fecn 0
>   compress:
>   header ip rtp
>   UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)
> Sent:455 total, 452 compressed, 
>  17160 bytes saved, 10140 bytes sent
>  2.69 efficiency improvement factor
>  99% hit ratio, five minute miss rate 0 misses/sec, 0 max
>  rate 0 bps
>   
> 
>   Service-policy : llq
> 
> queue stats for all priority classes:
>   
>   queue limit 64 packets
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
> 
> Class-map: voice (match-all)
>   0 packets, 0 bytes
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>   Match: ip dscp ef (46)
>   Match: protocol rtp
>   Match: protocol rtcp
>   Priority: 24 kbps, burst bytes 1500, b/w exceed drops: 0
>   
> 
> Class-map: signal (match-all)
>   0 packets, 0 bytes
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>   Match: ip dscp cs3 (24)
>   Match: protocol sip
>   Match: protocol h323
>   Match: protocol mgcp
>   Match: protocol skinny
>   Queueing
>   queue limit 64 packets
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
>   bandwidth 18 kbps
> 
> Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>   3234 packets, 563006 bytes
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>   Match: any 
>   
>   queue limit 64 packets
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 3234/545846
> r3800-2j-a(config)#
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>   Match: ip dscp ef (46)
>   Match: protocol rtp
>   Match: protocol rtcp
>   Priority: 24 kbps, burst bytes 1500, b/w exceed drops: 0
>   
> 
> Class-map: signal (match-all)
>   0 packets, 0 bytes
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>   Match: ip dscp cs3 (24)
>   Match: protocol sip
>   Match: protocol h323
>   Match: protocol mgcp
>   Match: protocol skinny
>   Queueing
>   queue limit 64 packets
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
>   bandwidth 18 kbps
> 
> Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>   3234 packets, 563006 bytes
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Class-Based Shaping Issue

2013-03-03 Thread Jason Lee
I reloaded the router and reapplied the QoS configuration.  No dice.  Still
not matching in the nested policy.  Very weird that it is working like a
champ in the SB router.  I've done this a couple times in the past and
never run into this issue.  I'm going to play with it a little longer, but
may have to come back to it in the morning with a fresh set of coffee
fueled eyes...


On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Bill  wrote:

> Well it looks like it is picking up the RTP header compression, shaping
> and even the service policy but not doing it.
>
> Have you tried rebooting the router or copy, delete then reapply ?
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Mar 3, 2013, at 8:43 PM, Jason Lee  wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Was wondering if I could get a second set of eyes on my Class Based
> Shaping configuration.  I just implemented between SA and SB.  The same
> configuration is used on both.  On SB I see the packets being captured in
> both policy maps.  On SA I don't see traffic being captured in the nested
> policy-map containing voice and signaling configuration.  Heres the
> output...
>
>
> r3800-2j-a(config)#do sh policy-map inter s0/2/0.1
>  Serial0/2/0.1: DLCI 201 -
>
>   Service-policy output: shape-policy-map
>
> Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>   3234 packets, 563006 bytes
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>   Match: any
>   Queueing
>   queue limit 64 packets
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 3234/545846
>   shape (average) cir 384000, bc 3840, be 0
>   target shape rate 384000
> lower bound cir 0,  adapt to fecn 0
>   compress:
>   header ip rtp
>   UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)
> Sent:455 total, 452 compressed,
>  17160 bytes saved, 10140 bytes sent
>  2.69 efficiency improvement factor
>  99% hit ratio, five minute miss rate 0 misses/sec, 0
> max
>  rate 0 bps
>
>
>   Service-policy : llq
>
> queue stats for all priority classes:
>
>   queue limit 64 packets
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
>
>  r3800-2j-a(config)#do sh policy-map inter s0/2/0.1
>  Serial0/2/0.1: DLCI 201 -
>
>   Service-policy output: shape-policy-map
>
> Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>   3234 packets, 563006 bytes
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>   Match: any
>   Queueing
>   queue limit 64 packets
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 3234/545846
>   shape (average) cir 384000, bc 3840, be 0
>   target shape rate 384000
> lower bound cir 0,  adapt to fecn 0
>   compress:
>   header ip rtp
>   UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)
> Sent:455 total, 452 compressed,
>  17160 bytes saved, 10140 bytes sent
>  2.69 efficiency improvement factor
>  99% hit ratio, five minute miss rate 0 misses/sec, 0
> max
>  rate 0 bps
>
>
>   Service-policy : llq
>
> queue stats for all priority classes:
>
>   queue limit 64 packets
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
>
> Class-map: voice (match-all)
>   0 packets, 0 bytes
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>   Match: ip dscp ef (46)
>   Match: protocol rtp
>   Match: protocol rtcp
>   Priority: 24 kbps, burst bytes 1500, b/w exceed drops: 0
>
>
> Class-map: signal (match-all)
>   0 packets, 0 bytes
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>   Match: ip dscp cs3 (24)
>   Match: protocol sip
>   Match: protocol h323
>   Match: protocol mgcp
>   Match: protocol skinny
>   Queueing
>   queue limit 64 packets
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
>   bandwidth 18 kbps
>
> Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>   3234 packets, 563006 bytes
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>   Match: any
>
>   queue limit 64 packets
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 3234/545846
> r3800-2j-a(config)#
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>   Match: ip dscp ef (46)
>   Match: protocol rtp
>   Match: protocol rtcp
>   Priority: 24 kbps, burst bytes 1500, b/w exceed drops: 0
>
>
> *Class-map: signal (match-all)*
> *  0 packets, 0 bytes*
>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>   Match: ip dscp cs3 (24)
>   Match: protocol sip
>   Match: protocol h323

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Class-Based Shaping Issue

2013-03-04 Thread ccieid1ot
Try modifying your config to this:

class-map match-any signal
 match ip dscp cs3
 match protocol sip
 match protocol h323
 match protocol mgcp
 match protocol skinny

class-map match-any voice
 match ip dscp ef
 match protocol rtp
 match protocol rtcp


On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Jason Lee  wrote:

> I reloaded the router and reapplied the QoS configuration.  No dice.
>  Still not matching in the nested policy.  Very weird that it is working
> like a champ in the SB router.  I've done this a couple times in the past
> and never run into this issue.  I'm going to play with it a little longer,
> but may have to come back to it in the morning with a fresh set of coffee
> fueled eyes...
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Bill  wrote:
>
>> Well it looks like it is picking up the RTP header compression, shaping
>> and even the service policy but not doing it.
>>
>> Have you tried rebooting the router or copy, delete then reapply ?
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Mar 3, 2013, at 8:43 PM, Jason Lee  wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Was wondering if I could get a second set of eyes on my Class Based
>> Shaping configuration.  I just implemented between SA and SB.  The same
>> configuration is used on both.  On SB I see the packets being captured in
>> both policy maps.  On SA I don't see traffic being captured in the nested
>> policy-map containing voice and signaling configuration.  Heres the
>> output...
>>
>>
>> r3800-2j-a(config)#do sh policy-map inter s0/2/0.1
>>  Serial0/2/0.1: DLCI 201 -
>>
>>   Service-policy output: shape-policy-map
>>
>> Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>>   3234 packets, 563006 bytes
>>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>>   Match: any
>>   Queueing
>>   queue limit 64 packets
>>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>>   (pkts output/bytes output) 3234/545846
>>   shape (average) cir 384000, bc 3840, be 0
>>   target shape rate 384000
>> lower bound cir 0,  adapt to fecn 0
>>   compress:
>>   header ip rtp
>>   UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)
>> Sent:455 total, 452 compressed,
>>  17160 bytes saved, 10140 bytes sent
>>  2.69 efficiency improvement factor
>>  99% hit ratio, five minute miss rate 0 misses/sec, 0
>> max
>>  rate 0 bps
>>
>>
>>   Service-policy : llq
>>
>> queue stats for all priority classes:
>>
>>   queue limit 64 packets
>>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>>   (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
>>
>>  r3800-2j-a(config)#do sh policy-map inter s0/2/0.1
>>  Serial0/2/0.1: DLCI 201 -
>>
>>   Service-policy output: shape-policy-map
>>
>> Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>>   3234 packets, 563006 bytes
>>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>>   Match: any
>>   Queueing
>>   queue limit 64 packets
>>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>>   (pkts output/bytes output) 3234/545846
>>   shape (average) cir 384000, bc 3840, be 0
>>   target shape rate 384000
>> lower bound cir 0,  adapt to fecn 0
>>   compress:
>>   header ip rtp
>>   UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)
>> Sent:455 total, 452 compressed,
>>  17160 bytes saved, 10140 bytes sent
>>  2.69 efficiency improvement factor
>>  99% hit ratio, five minute miss rate 0 misses/sec, 0
>> max
>>  rate 0 bps
>>
>>
>>   Service-policy : llq
>>
>> queue stats for all priority classes:
>>
>>   queue limit 64 packets
>>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>>   (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
>>
>> Class-map: voice (match-all)
>>   0 packets, 0 bytes
>>5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>>   Match: ip dscp ef (46)
>>   Match: protocol rtp
>>   Match: protocol rtcp
>>   Priority: 24 kbps, burst bytes 1500, b/w exceed drops: 0
>>
>>
>> Class-map: signal (match-all)
>>   0 packets, 0 bytes
>>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>>   Match: ip dscp cs3 (24)
>>   Match: protocol sip
>>   Match: protocol h323
>>   Match: protocol mgcp
>>   Match: protocol skinny
>>   Queueing
>>   queue limit 64 packets
>>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>>   (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
>>   bandwidth 18 kbps
>>
>> Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>>   3234 packets, 563006 bytes
>>   5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>>   Match: any
>>
>>   queue limit 64 packets
>>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>>   (pkts output/bytes output) 3234/545846
>> r3800-2j-a(config)#
>>   5 mi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class based shaping and cRTP

2010-02-27 Thread Mark Nigh
I noticed when I remove the compress header ip rtp from the WAN-EDGE policy-map 
and place into the class class-default of the cbase-shaping policy-map, it 
works. Is this correct?

Mark Nigh
Systems Engineer
mn...@netelligent.com
 (p) 314.392.6926
[cid:image001.gif@01CAB7B1.D8E2B130]<http://www.netelligent.com/>

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Nigh
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 1:31 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class based shaping and cRTP

Can anyone check out my configuration of class based shaping and class based 
cRTP. Seems that I can't get the compression to increment when I configure 
class based shaping. When I use MLPPP and cRTP, it increments.

Thanks for your assistance.

class-map match-any signal
 match ip dscp af31
 match ip dscp cs3  af31
class-map match-any voice
 match ip dscp ef
 match protocol rtp
!
!
policy-map WAN-EDGE
 class voice
priority percent 33
   compress header ip rtp
 class signal
priority percent 5
policy-map cbase-shaping
 class class-default
shape average 368400 3684 0
  service-policy WAN-EDGE

interface Serial0/0/0
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF
 ip ospf mtu-ignore
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface Serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
 ip address 10.6.255.254 255.255.255.252
 ip ospf mtu-ignore
 snmp trap link-status
 frame-relay interface-dlci 201
  class fr-map-class

map-class frame-relay fr-map-class
 frame-relay fragment 480
 frame-relay fair-queue
 service-policy output cbase-shaping

SHOW COMMOND

R2#sh policy-map int
 Serial0/0/0.1: DLCI 201 -

  Service-policy output: cbase-shaping

Class-map: class-default (match-any)
  11179 packets, 717408 bytes
  5 minute offered rate 25000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
  Match: any
  Queueing
  queue limit 64 packets
  (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
  (pkts output/bytes output) 11179/717408
  shape (average) cir 368400, bc 3684, be 0
  target shape rate 368400
lower bound cir 0,  adapt to fecn 0

  Service-policy : WAN-EDGE

queue stats for all priority classes:
  Queueing
  queue limit 64 packets
  (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
  (pkts output/bytes output) 11014/704896

Class-map: voice (match-any)
  11014 packets, 704896 bytes   ** These packets increment.
  5 minute offered rate 25000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
  Match: ip dscp ef (46)
1640 packets, 104960 bytes
5 minute rate 0 bps
  Match: protocol rtp
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute rate 0 bps
  Priority: 33% (121 kbps), burst bytes 3000, b/w exceed drops: 0

  compress:   * I get nothing on this.
  header ip rtp
  UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)
Sent:0 total, 0 compressed,
 0 bytes saved, 0 bytes sent
 rate 0 bps

Mark Nigh
Systems Engineer
mn...@netelligent.com
 (p) 314.392.6926
[cid:image001.gif@01CAB7B1.D8E2B130]<http://www.netelligent.com/>



This transmission and any attached files are privileged, confidential or 
otherwise the exclusive property of the intended recipient or Netelligent 
Corporation. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this 
transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please contact us immediately by responding to this message or by 
telephone (314-392-6900) and promptly destroy the original transmission and its 
attachments.


This transmission and any attached files are privileged, confidential or 
otherwise the exclusive property of the intended recipient or Netelligent 
Corporation. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this 
transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please contact us immediately by responding to this message or by 
telephone (314-392-6900) and promptly destroy the original transmission and its 
attachments.
<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class based shaping and cRTP

2010-03-01 Thread Mark Nigh
Is this the correct configuration (below), applying "compression header ip rtp" 
to the voice class? When I assign it to the class class-default of the 
policy-map cbase-shaping compression works and I see it increment, but the SRND 
states I need to apply it to the voice class? Thanks for your help.


Mark Nigh
Systems Engineer
mn...@netelligent.com
 (p) 314.392.6926
[cid:image001.gif@01CAB94B.BCDF7F90]<http://www.netelligent.com/>

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Nigh
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 1:31 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class based shaping and cRTP

Can anyone check out my configuration of class based shaping and class based 
cRTP. Seems that I can't get the compression to increment when I configure 
class based shaping. When I use MLPPP and cRTP, it increments.

Thanks for your assistance.

class-map match-any signal
 match ip dscp af31
 match ip dscp cs3  af31
class-map match-any voice
 match ip dscp ef
 match protocol rtp
!
!
policy-map WAN-EDGE
 class voice
priority percent 33
   compress header ip rtp
 class signal
priority percent 5
policy-map cbase-shaping
 class class-default
shape average 368400 3684 0
  service-policy WAN-EDGE

interface Serial0/0/0
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF
 ip ospf mtu-ignore
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface Serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
 ip address 10.6.255.254 255.255.255.252
 ip ospf mtu-ignore
 snmp trap link-status
 frame-relay interface-dlci 201
  class fr-map-class

map-class frame-relay fr-map-class
 frame-relay fragment 480
 frame-relay fair-queue
 service-policy output cbase-shaping

SHOW COMMOND

R2#sh policy-map int
 Serial0/0/0.1: DLCI 201 -

  Service-policy output: cbase-shaping

Class-map: class-default (match-any)
  11179 packets, 717408 bytes
  5 minute offered rate 25000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
  Match: any
  Queueing
  queue limit 64 packets
  (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
  (pkts output/bytes output) 11179/717408
  shape (average) cir 368400, bc 3684, be 0
  target shape rate 368400
lower bound cir 0,  adapt to fecn 0

  Service-policy : WAN-EDGE

queue stats for all priority classes:
  Queueing
  queue limit 64 packets
  (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
  (pkts output/bytes output) 11014/704896

Class-map: voice (match-any)
  11014 packets, 704896 bytes   ** These packets increment.
  5 minute offered rate 25000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
  Match: ip dscp ef (46)
1640 packets, 104960 bytes
5 minute rate 0 bps
  Match: protocol rtp
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute rate 0 bps
  Priority: 33% (121 kbps), burst bytes 3000, b/w exceed drops: 0

  compress:   * I get nothing on this.
  header ip rtp
  UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)
Sent:0 total, 0 compressed,
 0 bytes saved, 0 bytes sent
 rate 0 bps

Mark Nigh
Systems Engineer
mn...@netelligent.com
 (p) 314.392.6926
[cid:image001.gif@01CAB94B.BCDF7F90]<http://www.netelligent.com/>



This transmission and any attached files are privileged, confidential or 
otherwise the exclusive property of the intended recipient or Netelligent 
Corporation. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this 
transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please contact us immediately by responding to this message or by 
telephone (314-392-6900) and promptly destroy the original transmission and its 
attachments.


This transmission and any attached files are privileged, confidential or 
otherwise the exclusive property of the intended recipient or Netelligent 
Corporation. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this 
transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please contact us immediately by responding to this message or by 
telephone (314-392-6900) and promptly destroy the original transmission and its 
attachments.
<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class based shaping and cRTP

2010-03-01 Thread Otto Sanchez
Hi Mark,

Your configuration is good, the right place to configure the "compress
header ip rtp" command is within the child policy (as SRND stated), remember
that rtp header compression is a cpu intensive task and you don't want the
router to compress all rtp traffic going though the wan link, only the
trusted voice traffic,

As per the statistics, I think I have seen this before during my tests. I
would do the following test, configure the voice class under the child
policy to allow only one compressed call (you should calculate this and set
the proper value with the priority XX command), make a call and see if
there's packet drops for the mentioned class, if there's no drops, router
might be displaying wrong compression statistics,

hth,

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Mark Nigh  wrote:

>  Is this the correct configuration (below), applying “compression header
> ip rtp” to the voice class? When I assign it to the class class-default of
> the policy-map cbase-shaping compression works and I see it increment, but
> the SRND states I need to apply it to the voice class? Thanks for your help.
>
>
>
>
>
> Mark Nigh
> *Systems Engineer*
>
> *mn...@netelligent.com*
>
>  (p) 314.392.6926
> [image: img_moreThan] <http://www.netelligent.com/>
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark Nigh
>
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 27, 2010 1:31 PM
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class based shaping and cRTP
>
>
>
> Can anyone check out my configuration of class based shaping and class
> based cRTP. Seems that I can’t get the compression to increment when I
> configure class based shaping. When I use MLPPP and cRTP, it increments.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your assistance.
>
>
>
> class-map match-any signal
>
>  match ip dscp af31
>
>  match ip dscp cs3  af31
>
> class-map match-any voice
>
>  match ip dscp ef
>
>  match protocol rtp
>
> !
>
> !
>
> policy-map WAN-EDGE
>
>  class voice
>
> priority percent 33
>
>compress header ip rtp
>
>  class signal
>
> priority percent 5
>
> policy-map cbase-shaping
>
>  class class-default
>
> shape average 368400 3684 0
>
>   service-policy WAN-EDGE
>
>
>
> interface Serial0/0/0
>
>  no ip address
>
>  encapsulation frame-relay IETF
>
>  ip ospf mtu-ignore
>
>  frame-relay lmi-type ansi
>
> !
>
> interface Serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
>
>  ip address 10.6.255.254 255.255.255.252
>
>  ip ospf mtu-ignore
>
>  snmp trap link-status
>
>  frame-relay interface-dlci 201
>
>   class fr-map-class
>
>
>
> map-class frame-relay fr-map-class
>
>  frame-relay fragment 480
>
>  frame-relay fair-queue
>
>  service-policy output cbase-shaping
>
>
>
> SHOW COMMOND
>
>
>
> R2#sh policy-map int
>
>  Serial0/0/0.1: DLCI 201 -
>
>
>
>   Service-policy output: cbase-shaping
>
>
>
> Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>
>   11179 packets, 717408 bytes
>
>   5 minute offered rate 25000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>
>   Match: any
>
>   Queueing
>
>   queue limit 64 packets
>
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 11179/717408
>
>   shape (average) cir 368400, bc 3684, be 0
>
>   target shape rate 368400
>
> lower bound cir 0,  adapt to fecn 0
>
>
>
>   Service-policy : WAN-EDGE
>
>
>
> queue stats for all priority classes:
>
>   Queueing
>
>   queue limit 64 packets
>
>   (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>
>   (pkts output/bytes output) 11014/704896
>
>
>
> Class-map: voice (match-any)
>
>   11014 packets, 704896 bytes   ** These packets increment.
>
>   5 minute offered rate 25000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>
>   Match: ip dscp ef (46)
>
> 1640 packets, 104960 bytes
>
> 5 minute rate 0 bps
>
>   Match: protocol rtp
>
> 0 packets, 0 bytes
>
> 5 minute rate 0 bps
>
>   Priority: 33% (121 kbps), burst bytes 3000, b/w exceed drops: 0
>
>
>
>   compress:   * I get nothing on this.
>
>   header ip rtp
>
>   UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)
>
> Sent:0 total, 0 compressed,
>
>  0 bytes saved, 0 bytes sent
>
>  rat