Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCX
All versions of unity are backward compatible -Original Message- From: Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx Sender: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:08:13 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCX ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCX
Hello I have doubt CUCM 7.1.3 can work Unity Connection 7.1.5 ?are compatible Thanks. La informaci?n incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No est? permitida su divulgaci?n y/o reproducci?n sin autorizaci?n. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCX
i don't think you should have a problem but you can confirm with the compatibility matrix 2011/6/17 Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx Hello I have doubt CUCM 7.1.3 can work Unity Connection 7.1.5 ?are compatible ** ** ** ** Thanks. ** ** -- La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCX preventing from answering calls that it originated
Hi Miron, Thanks for this. There is even more: Enable for Supervised Transfers - Check this check box so that Cisco Unity Connection uses DTMF to detect and reject calls that have been transferred to another extension (by using supervised transfer) and that have been transferred back to Connection. If the call loop is not detected and rejected, Connection records a voice message that contains the prompt to leave a voice message. Default setting: Check box not checked. Enable for Forwarded Message Notification Calls (by Using Extension) Check this check box so that Cisco Unity Connection uses the extension to detect and reject new-message notifications that are sent to a device (such as a mobile phone) and that the device forwards back to Connection because the device did not answer. If the call loop is not detected and rejected, the call creates a new voice message for the user and triggers Connection to send a new-message notification call to the device. Default setting: Check box not checked. But these settings appear available on a UC Version 7.1.5ES7.1-7 not sure at the moment if this is also at 7.0 available, but I will know at the next proctorlabs session. ;-) Cheers, Bernhard Von: Miron Kobelski [mailto:findko...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 1. Oktober 2010 00:13 An: Stutz, Bernhard Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Betreff: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCX preventing from answering calls that it originated Hi Bernhard, My understanding is that CUC can sometimes originate calls, which could be routed back to it. E.g. voicemail notification for a DN with cfwdall back to CUC would end up as an endless loop of CUC speaking with itself. Have a look at options at: CUC Administration Telephony Integration Phone System Call Loop Detection by Using DTMF regards kobel On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 18:42, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de wrote: Hi, I came across a question that is always within a Unity Connection integration: The UC server should be prevented from answering calls that it originated. I am not sure what this means. Could someone please shed some light on it? Is there a checkbox somewhere that needs to be checked in order to achieve this? I can't find a explanation for this at the solutions so far, so i was guessing that this is given anyway. thanks in advance, Bernhard ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCX preventing from answering calls that it originated
Hi Bernhard, My understanding is that CUC can sometimes originate calls, which could be routed back to it. E.g. voicemail notification for a DN with cfwdall back to CUC would end up as an endless loop of CUC speaking with itself. Have a look at options at: CUC Administration Telephony Integration Phone System Call Loop Detection by Using DTMF regards kobel On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 18:42, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de wrote: Hi, I came across a question that is always within a Unity Connection integration: The UC server should be prevented from answering calls that it originated. I am not sure what this means. Could someone please shed some light on it? Is there a checkbox somewhere that needs to be checked in order to achieve this? I can't find a explanation for this at the solutions so far, so i was guessing that this is given anyway. thanks in advance, Bernhard ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
