[ccp4bb] Postdoc positions in Yokohama

2007-03-30 Thread Jeremy Tame

Post-doctoral positions are available in the Protein Design group
at Yokohama City University.  Projects include beta helical bacterial
virulence factors and protein-based nanocomponents for semiconductor
manufacture (in collaboration with Panasonic). See J. Biol. Chem. 280,
17339-17345 (2005) and Structure 14, 925-933 (2006) for more details.

The group is well equipped with three R-Axis detectors, AUC, ample
wet lab facilities including crystallisation robotics and ready access 
to ITC,

CD, SAXS and NMR, and is conveniently located between SPring8 and the
Photon Factory.

Please visit our web site for more information:
www.tsurumi.yokohama-cu.ac.jp/pdl/index.html

Yokohama is a lively city with great food and excellent travel 
connections

to the rest of Japan and Asia.

Interested candidates with a molecular biological or crystallographic
background are welcome to send a CV to:

Jeremy Tame
Protein Design Laboratory, Yokohama City University
Suehiro 1-7-29, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan

Tel +81 (0)45 508 7228Fax +81 (0)45 508 7366


Re: [ccp4bb] Merohedral twinning

2007-03-30 Thread Eleanor Dodson
1) Why do you think there is twinning?  If you label a structure whose 
true spacegroup is H32 as having SG H3, then some of the twinning 
analyses report that this is consistent with perfect twinning..


I believe the graphs of the moments from TRUNCATE give a true indicator.
Ditto the latest SFCHECK in ccp4-6.0.2 does a good analysis and usually 
gets it right


2) If there is twinning smetimes a smaller crystal shows less effect.

3) If you can solve it then it can be refined using SHELXL.
MR works for twiinned data usually..

Eleanor

Mark Mayer wrote:

Hi,

I'd greatly appreciate advice on how to proceed with trying to solve and refine a structure with 
nearly perfect merohedral twinning - or is this impossible?  The SG is H3; most likely nmol is asu 
is 4 from Matthews coefficient - but not sure about this. 


Here are the twinning stats from phenix xtriage
--
| Operator  | type | R obs. | Britton alpha | H alpha | ML alpha |
--
| h,-h-k,-l |   M  | 0.038  | 0.452 | 0.468   | 0.478|
-- 

The data is for a novel ligand complex for which we have previously solved structures with 
different ligands in other space groups - the protein has two domains, and these may have moved 
compared to other structures.


So what should I do? Try and solve by MR using detwinned structure factors? Can Refmac refine 
the twin fraction, or should I refine against detwinned mtz file? Or ... should we look for additional 
xtal forms, or try additives to see if we can reduce twinning?


Thanks !!!



  


Re: [ccp4bb] Multiple nucleation

2007-03-30 Thread Radisky, Evette S. Ph.D.
In addition to trying lower concentrations of PEG and protein, you might
consider whether aggregation in your protein stock or vibration in your
crystallization environment are contributing to the problem, and how
they might be minimized.  It might be obvious, but we have found that it
is important for protein stocks to be filtered or centrifuged to remove
aggregates immediately prior to setting up drops, and if the protein
solutions have been sitting around for a few hours or a few days, they
must be centrifuged again.  We also had a stupid incident recently where
conditions that had previously generated high quality crystals were
suddenly producing thousands of tiny crystals instead, and the problem
was traced to a clinical centrifuge that had been moved to an adjoining
bench and was vibrating the crystallization shelf.
 
Evette S. Radisky, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor and Associate Consultant II
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Griffin Cancer Research Building, Rm 310
4500 San Pablo Road
Jacksonville, FL 32224
(904) 953-6372 (office)
(904) 953-2857 (lab)
 



From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jobichen Chacko
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 7:45 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Multiple nucleation


Hai All,
Sorry for the non Ccp4 question.
I got very small crystals for a protein and I am trying to optimize the
condition to improve the size of the crystal and reduce the number of
nucleation.
The crystals are coming from five to six conditions , all have PEG 3350
in common.
Apart from PEG, the condition has Lithium sulphate and Bis Tris in one
condition and Ammonium suphate and HEPES in another condition, while the
third condition is Sodium malonate, Bis Tris  and PEG. I am getting
thousands of small crystals with some precipitation.
I tried macroseeding and additive screen, but the crystals are not
growing.
Any suggestions are more than welcome.
Thank you.
Jobi
 
 

 


Re: [ccp4bb] Multiple nucleation

2007-03-30 Thread Raji Edayathumangalam
I've found that crystallization in sitting drops under oil dramatically reduces 
the no. of nucleation events and increases the overall crystal size. Now, if 
the increased crystal size helps improve diffraction is something to be tested.

Among the many other suggestions...
Raji



-Included Message--
Hai All,
Sorry for the non Ccp4 question.
I got very small crystals for a protein and I am trying to optimize the 
condition to improve the size of the crystal and reduce the number of 
nucleation.
The crystals are coming from five to six conditions , all have PEG 3350 in 
common.
Apart from PEG, the condition has Lithium sulphate and Bis Tris in one 
condition and Ammonium suphate and HEPES in another condition, while the third 
condition is Sodium malonate, Bis Tris  and PEG. I am getting thousands of 
small crystals with some
precipitation.
I tried macroseeding and additive screen, but the crystals are not growing.
Any suggestions are more than welcome.
Thank you.
Jobi
 
 

 


-End of Included Message--


Re: [ccp4bb] Right Handedness of Density

2007-03-30 Thread Ruchi Anand
Dear All,
We are working with a DNA binding protein with 4 Zn sites in in ASU. Using SnB 
and then CNS we were able to get a map using MAD phasing and could visualize 
the density for the double helix of the DNA but it was a left handed spiral 
instead of the usual right handed one. The space group which yielded the result 
was P3(2). We tried to flip the sites and change the space group to P3(1) but 
we are not able to generate a sensible map. Any advice regarding the best way 
to proceed will be very helpful. The resolution is around 3.2.
Thanks 
Ruchi


Re: [ccp4bb] Right Handedness of Density

2007-03-30 Thread Green, Todd
Hello Ruchi,

I know that when you use non-crystallographic averaging there is a possibility 
of the starting with positive density and ending up with negative, the 
enantiomorph, or the negative enantiomorph density.  In order to shift back to 
the correct phases you can apply a simple formula. This is the math that i 
recall:

positive  structure  alpha
negative structure   alpha + 180
enantiomorphic structure-alpha
negative enantiomorphic structure   -alpha + 180

The recollection comes from a paper in methods in enzymology that i don't 
recall the author or year of at the moment.

I know your case has nothing to do with averaging but the math should hold 
true. In this case, you can switch between the enantiomorphs by multiplying the 
phases by -1. I don't know if this holds a solution to your case. It may be 
worth a quick shot just to multiply the phase column by -1. I may be far off 
base here but i think i am correct. This of course is assuming that you have 
the correct space group and that you have the enantiomorphic phases. 

If i am totally off on this, someone please correct me. I'm really sticking my 
neck out late on a friday, eh!

Good Luck-
todd


-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Ruchi Anand
Sent: Fri 3/30/2007 5:31 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Right Handedness of Density
 
Dear All,
We are working with a DNA binding protein with 4 Zn sites in in ASU. Using SnB 
and then CNS we were able to get a map using MAD phasing and could visualize 
the density for the double helix of the DNA but it was a left handed spiral 
instead of the usual right handed one. The space group which yielded the result 
was P3(2). We tried to flip the sites and change the space group to P3(1) but 
we are not able to generate a sensible map. Any advice regarding the best way 
to proceed will be very helpful. The resolution is around 3.2.
Thanks 
Ruchi


This email was scanned with Mcafee's Anti-Virus appliance, but this 
is no guarantee that no virus exists. You are asked to make sure you
have virus protection and that it is up to date.



Re: [ccp4bb] Right Handedness of Density

2007-03-30 Thread Debanu Das

Hi,
  If you have density for the protein and the DNA and the density for 
the protein is correct and you see left-handed DNA density, then I 
suppose you are seeing Z-DNA?


Doesn't seem like a problem of incorrect enantiomorph if your protein 
density is fine. You can pull out a Z-DNA structure from the PDB and see 
if you can get a fit into the density that you see and if it makes sense 
you can then try to build an idealized Z-DNA based on the sequence you 
used for crystallization.


Regards,
Debanu.

Green, Todd wrote:


Hello Ruchi,

I know that when you use non-crystallographic averaging there is a 
possibility of the starting with positive density and ending up with 
negative, the enantiomorph, or the negative enantiomorph density.  In 
order to shift back to the correct phases you can apply a simple 
formula. This is the math that i recall:


positive  structure  alpha
negative structure   alpha + 180
enantiomorphic structure-alpha
negative enantiomorphic structure   -alpha + 180

The recollection comes from a paper in methods in enzymology that i 
don't recall the author or year of at the moment.


I know your case has nothing to do with averaging but the math should 
hold true. In this case, you can switch between the enantiomorphs by 
multiplying the phases by -1. I don't know if this holds a solution to 
your case. It may be worth a quick shot just to multiply the phase 
column by -1. I may be far off base here but i think i am correct. 
This of course is assuming that you have the correct space group and 
that you have the enantiomorphic phases.


If i am totally off on this, someone please correct me. I'm really 
sticking my neck out late on a friday, eh!


Good Luck-
todd


-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Ruchi Anand
Sent: Fri 3/30/2007 5:31 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Right Handedness of Density

Dear All,
We are working with a DNA binding protein with 4 Zn sites in in ASU. 
Using SnB and then CNS we were able to get a map using MAD phasing and 
could visualize the density for the double helix of the DNA but it was 
a left handed spiral instead of the usual right handed one. The space 
group which yielded the result was P3(2). We tried to flip the sites 
and change the space group to P3(1) but we are not able to generate a 
sensible map. Any advice regarding the best way to proceed will be 
very helpful. The resolution is around 3.2.

Thanks
Ruchi


This email was scanned with Mcafee's Anti-Virus appliance, but this
is no guarantee that no virus exists. You are asked to make sure you
have virus protection and that it is up to date.