Re: [ccp4bb] Which version of ccp4 introduced i2run and/or where does it live?

2024-02-19 Thread Klureza, Maggie
Hi Kay,

I did find
/Applications/ccp4-8.0/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/site-packages/ccp4i2/bin/i2run
on my Mac, and was able to use that to successfully bring up the
import_merged help documentation, so I think that's working - thanks!

For general reference, thanks to an individual reply I got: Evidently i2run
is located in 7.0/7.1 installations at ccp4-7.1/share/ccp4i2/bin/i2run (and
I was able to produce the same import_merged help documentation via that
approach as well).

Thanks!
Maggie

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:37 AM Kay Diederichs <
kay.diederi...@uni-konstanz.de> wrote:

> Hi Maggie,
>
> I have CCP4 version 8.0 on my Mac and it does have the file
>
> /Applications/ccp4-8.0/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ccp4i2/bin/i2run
>
> If I run it without arguments, it says
> CCP4 /Applications/ccp4-8.0
> ccp4i2 version 1.1.0
> ccp4i2 source revision 6539
> Failed with exception  list index out of range
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File
> "/Applications/ccp4-8.0/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ccp4i2/core/CCP4I2Runner.py",
> line 721, in 
> theRunner = CI2Runner(sys.argv)
>   File
> "/Applications/ccp4-8.0/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ccp4i2/core/CCP4I2Runner.py",
> line 34, in __init__
> self.add_arguments(theParser, cmdLineArgs)
>   File
> "/Applications/ccp4-8.0/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ccp4i2/core/CCP4I2Runner.py",
> line 381, in add_arguments
> taskName = cmdLineArgs[1]
> IndexError: list index out of range
>
> so it seems to work in principle. However, the directory where i2run lives
> is not in the $PATH so one might want to
> sudo ln -s
> /Applications/ccp4-8.0/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ccp4i2/bin/i2run
> /Applications/ccp4-8.0/bin
>
> in order to run it with just "i2run".
> There is documentation in
>
> /Applications/ccp4-8.0/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ccp4i2/docs/sphinx/build/html/_sources/i2run/i2run.rst.txt
>
> Hope this helps,
> Kay
>
>
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 19:21:21 -0500, Klureza, Maggie <
> mklur...@g.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I would very much like to make use of i2run's capacity for scripting,
> >rather than pressing the same sequence of GUI buttons a few dozen times,
> >but I'm having trouble actually calling it.
> >
> >The documentation <https://ccp4i2.gitlab.io/rstdocs/i2run/i2run.html> I
> >found gives example code snippets structured as "i2run [function]
> >[options]", but even immediately after sourcing ccp4, entering e.g. "i2run
> >import_merged --help" returns an error saying "bash: i2run: command not
> >found".
> >
> >I found only one reference to i2run on the ccp4bb archive
> ><https://www.mail-archive.com/ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk/msg56079.html>
> >(actually from just 2 days ago!), which included a script that called
> i2run
> >using the full path of
> >"/ccp4-8.0/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ccp4i2/bin/i2run crank2". However,
> I
> >was not able to find any equivalent path in either of the 2 ccp4
> >installations I have access to.
> >
> >Ideally I'd like to use our lab's installation of ccp4 on our university
> >computational cluster, which is currently ccp4-7.1. Attempting to follow
> >the analogous path took me to "ccp4-7.1/lib/python2.7/site-packages",
> which
> >did not contain a ccp4i2 directory. I'm wondering if perhaps i2run wasn't
> >introduced until ccp4-8.0, and we would need an updated installation?
> >Except, I also have ccp4 downloaded on my laptop (a Mac, if that's
> >relevant), and going to "ccp4-8.0/lib/python3.7/site-packages" there still
> >did not produce a ccp4i2 directory.
> >
> >Therefore, I'm wondering: Does ccp4-7.1 contain i2run, or would I need to
> >update to 8.0 no matter what? And, almost regardless of the answer to that
> >first question: What is the proper way to call i2run/where does it live
> >within a ccp4 installation? I've been searching through the online
> >documentation, but all the information I could find seemed to assume that
> >i2run was readily accessible given the existence of a ccp4 installation,
> so
> >I'm a bit stumped.
> >
> >Many thanks,
> >Maggie
> >
> >
> >
> >To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> >https://www.jiscmail

[ccp4bb] Which version of ccp4 introduced i2run and/or where does it live?

2024-02-17 Thread Klureza, Maggie
Hi all,

I would very much like to make use of i2run's capacity for scripting,
rather than pressing the same sequence of GUI buttons a few dozen times,
but I'm having trouble actually calling it.

The documentation <https://ccp4i2.gitlab.io/rstdocs/i2run/i2run.html> I
found gives example code snippets structured as "i2run [function]
[options]", but even immediately after sourcing ccp4, entering e.g. "i2run
import_merged --help" returns an error saying "bash: i2run: command not
found".

I found only one reference to i2run on the ccp4bb archive
<https://www.mail-archive.com/ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk/msg56079.html>
(actually from just 2 days ago!), which included a script that called i2run
using the full path of
"/ccp4-8.0/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ccp4i2/bin/i2run crank2". However, I
was not able to find any equivalent path in either of the 2 ccp4
installations I have access to.

Ideally I'd like to use our lab's installation of ccp4 on our university
computational cluster, which is currently ccp4-7.1. Attempting to follow
the analogous path took me to "ccp4-7.1/lib/python2.7/site-packages", which
did not contain a ccp4i2 directory. I'm wondering if perhaps i2run wasn't
introduced until ccp4-8.0, and we would need an updated installation?
Except, I also have ccp4 downloaded on my laptop (a Mac, if that's
relevant), and going to "ccp4-8.0/lib/python3.7/site-packages" there still
did not produce a ccp4i2 directory.

Therefore, I'm wondering: Does ccp4-7.1 contain i2run, or would I need to
update to 8.0 no matter what? And, almost regardless of the answer to that
first question: What is the proper way to call i2run/where does it live
within a ccp4 installation? I've been searching through the online
documentation, but all the information I could find seemed to assume that
i2run was readily accessible given the existence of a ccp4 installation, so
I'm a bit stumped.

Many thanks,
Maggie



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/


[ccp4bb] switching space group

2013-11-06 Thread MAGGIE
Hi,

I have a structure which should have space group P212121, but it has been
processed to P21212.  It can not be solved and refined.  Right now I do not
have HKL2000, but I need change the space group to P212121.  Is there a way
for me to do this using CCP4?

Thank you,

Maggie


Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] insertion code problem

2013-06-27 Thread MAGGIE
Thank you, guys.  My problem has been solved.  AutoMR in CCP4 removed the
insertion code. But I used it before, and it did not mess up with the
insertion code at those times.

Rain


On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Ian Tickle ianj...@gmail.com wrote:

  Last time I checked pdbset doesn't renumber the LINK, CISPEP, SSBOND
 records at the same time (but maybe it was fixed).

 -- Ian


 On 26 June 2013 07:41, Francois Berenger beren...@riken.jp wrote:

 I think pdbset from CCP4 can renumber a PDB and hence get rid of the
 uggly insertion codes.


 On 06/26/2013 03:33 PM, herman.schreu...@sanofi.com wrote:

 Dear Rain,
 Insertion codes are still a sore point for many CCP4 programs and one of
 the reasons I prefer Buster over Refmac. Refmac5 does not remove
 insertion codes so I suspect the problem was with autoMR. The easiest is
 to superimpose your search model with insertion codes onto the pdb file
 which came out of the autoMR procedure. You could use lsqkab, but I
 think you can also do it in Coot. Then you continue refinement with this
 superimposed model. However, when I refined some structure with
 insertion codes in Refmac last week, Refmac created LINKR gap
 records for the inserted residues, cutting all peptide links. With an
 editor I had to change the gap to TRANS and then it worked.
 Good luck!
 Herman

 --**--**
 
 *Von:* CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] *Im
 Auftrag von *MAGGIE
 *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2013 04:07
 *An:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
 *Betreff:* [ccp4bb] insertion code problem


 Dear group,

 I have a insertion code question.  I used molecular replacement
 (CCP4, autoMR) to solve two structures: one is monomer, and another
 one is tetramer.  The model I used is one chain of a dimer and the
 model has insertion code.  After molecular replacement and
 refinement using refmac5 in CCP4, the new structures lost the
 insertion code, and the residues were numbered consecutively.

 Can anyone tell me how to keep the insertion code in the new
 structures?

 Thank you,

 Rain





[ccp4bb] insertion code problem

2013-06-25 Thread MAGGIE
Dear group,

I have a insertion code question.  I used molecular replacement (CCP4,
autoMR) to solve two structures: one is monomer, and another one is
tetramer.  The model I used is one chain of a dimer and the model has
insertion code.  After molecular replacement and refinement using refmac5
in CCP4, the new structures lost the insertion code, and the residues were
numbered consecutively.

Can anyone tell me how to keep the insertion code in the new structures?

Thank you,

Rain


[ccp4bb] GPCR DOCK 2013 announcement

2013-01-23 Thread Maggie Gabanyi
Since there may some on this bb who have modelers as colleagues...

On behalf of the PSI GPCR Network group:

--

Dear GPCR modeling and docking researcher,

We are writing to announce the 3rd round of the GPCR Docking and Modeling 
Assessment, GPCR Dock 2013, and to invite you to submit your predictions of 
GPCR-ligand structures for comparison prior to publication of the results. The 
first two GPCR Dock assessments were conducted in 2008 and 2010 and were based 
on the structures of A2A adenosine receptor (GPCR Dock 2008; NRDD 2009), 
dopamine D3 receptor and chemokine receptor CXCR4 (GPCR Dock 2010; Structure 
2011). As before, the results from GPCR Dock 2013 will be published once an 
analysis is complete.

The present round of the assessment will be focused on four target complexes. 
Participants can choose to predict any one, two, three, or all four targets. 
Predicting all four targets is strongly encouraged. Registered participants 
will receive receptor and ligand information at midnight (Pacific standard 
time) on Feb 1st, and will have until midnight (PST) March 3rd (30 days) to 
deposit models. Further information about the assessment and registration forms 
to participate can be found at http://gpcr.scripps.edu/GPCRDock2013   

If you have any questions, please email (gpcrd...@scripps.edu) we will try to 
get back to you quickly and will also post any general comments to all 
registered participants.

GPCR Network

Ray Stevens
Ruben Abagyan
Irina Kufareva
Angela Walker
Seva Katritch







Margaret J. Gabanyi, Ph.D.
Asst. Research Professor, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology 
Sr. Outreach Coordinator, PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase 
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
174 Frelinghuysen Rd
Piscataway, NJ 08854-8076
phone: 848-445-4932
gaba...@rcsb.rutgers.edu

Discover more at http://sbkb.org
--