Re: [ccp4bb] PDB redo R free

2023-04-28 Thread Robbie Joosten
To add to Tim's references, the algorithms that pdb-redo uses to deal with Rfree and possible bias are described here: https://journals.iucr.org/d/issues/2012/04/00/ba5174/index.htmlIf you happen to have a very small dataset (< 5000 reflections) pdb-redo does 10-fold cross validation and returns Rcomplete as well.Cheers,RobbieOn 28 Apr 2023 11:26, Tim Gruene  wrote:Dear Qixu Cai,

it  is a misconception that Rfree was not free anymore. The gap does
not close when you swap the reflections in Rfree set. The 'free'
reflections are freed when you do proper refinement, i.e., when the
value of the target function becomes stationary.
See https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444997013875 and
https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444999016868 for the mathematical
background, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502136112 for an experimental
treatment, and Ian Tickle's explanations on this topic here on the
CCP4bb.

Best wishes,
Tim


On Fri, 28 Apr 2023 16:54:07 +0800 Qixu Cai  wrote:

> Dear Robbie and Tim,
> 
> Thanks a lot for your reply. I just do not understand that if we can
> change the R free set during different rounds of refinement, the gap
> between Rwork and Rfree would be small, and Rfree would be
> meaningless, as R-free set is not "free".
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Qixu Cai
> Email: caiq...@gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
> Robbie Joosten  于2023年4月28日周五
> 15:26写道:
> 
> > Hi Qixu,
> >
> > PDB-REDO tries to have a minimum number test set reflections to
> > reduce the error margin in R-free. As Tim says this is not a
> > problem but if you reach out privately we can change your
> > calculation to use your current testset. That is not recommended
> > though.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Robbie
> >
> > On 28 Apr 2023 04:51, Qixu Cai  wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I'm using the PDB-REDO server to refine my structure. I found that
> > PDB-REDO said that 5% R-free set is too small and it created a new
> > R-free set.
> >
> > Is possible for the PDB-REDO server to keep the original R-free set
> > to make final Rfree value comparable?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Qixu Cai
> > Email: caiq...@gmail.com
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1
> >
> >
> >  



-- 
--
Tim Gruene
Head of the Centre for X-ray Structure Analysis
Faculty of Chemistry
University of Vienna

Phone: +43-1-4277-70202

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A




To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1



Re: [ccp4bb] PDB redo R free

2023-04-28 Thread Tim Gruene
Dear Qixu Cai,

it  is a misconception that Rfree was not free anymore. The gap does
not close when you swap the reflections in Rfree set. The 'free'
reflections are freed when you do proper refinement, i.e., when the
value of the target function becomes stationary.
See https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444997013875 and
https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444999016868 for the mathematical
background, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502136112 for an experimental
treatment, and Ian Tickle's explanations on this topic here on the
CCP4bb.

Best wishes,
Tim


On Fri, 28 Apr 2023 16:54:07 +0800 Qixu Cai  wrote:

> Dear Robbie and Tim,
> 
> Thanks a lot for your reply. I just do not understand that if we can
> change the R free set during different rounds of refinement, the gap
> between Rwork and Rfree would be small, and Rfree would be
> meaningless, as R-free set is not "free".
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Qixu Cai
> Email: caiq...@gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
> Robbie Joosten  于2023年4月28日周五
> 15:26写道:
> 
> > Hi Qixu,
> >
> > PDB-REDO tries to have a minimum number test set reflections to
> > reduce the error margin in R-free. As Tim says this is not a
> > problem but if you reach out privately we can change your
> > calculation to use your current testset. That is not recommended
> > though.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Robbie
> >
> > On 28 Apr 2023 04:51, Qixu Cai  wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I'm using the PDB-REDO server to refine my structure. I found that
> > PDB-REDO said that 5% R-free set is too small and it created a new
> > R-free set.
> >
> > Is possible for the PDB-REDO server to keep the original R-free set
> > to make final Rfree value comparable?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Qixu Cai
> > Email: caiq...@gmail.com
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1
> >
> >
> >  



-- 
--
Tim Gruene
Head of the Centre for X-ray Structure Analysis
Faculty of Chemistry
University of Vienna

Phone: +43-1-4277-70202

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/


pgpjj_Lr7i04I.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [ccp4bb] PDB redo R free

2023-04-28 Thread Qixu Cai
Dear Robbie and Tim,

Thanks a lot for your reply. I just do not understand that if we can change
the R free set during different rounds of refinement, the gap between Rwork
and Rfree would be small, and Rfree would be meaningless, as R-free set is
not "free".

Best regards,

Qixu Cai
Email: caiq...@gmail.com



Robbie Joosten  于2023年4月28日周五 15:26写道:

> Hi Qixu,
>
> PDB-REDO tries to have a minimum number test set reflections to reduce the
> error margin in R-free. As Tim says this is not a problem but if you reach
> out privately we can change your calculation to use your current testset.
> That is not recommended though.
>
> Cheers,
> Robbie
>
> On 28 Apr 2023 04:51, Qixu Cai  wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I'm using the PDB-REDO server to refine my structure. I found that
> PDB-REDO said that 5% R-free set is too small and it created a new R-free
> set.
>
> Is possible for the PDB-REDO server to keep the original R-free set to
> make final Rfree value comparable?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Qixu Cai
> Email: caiq...@gmail.com
>
>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1
>
>
>



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/


Re: [ccp4bb] PDB redo R free

2023-04-28 Thread Robbie Joosten
Hi Qixu,PDB-REDO tries to have a minimum number test set reflections to reduce the error margin in R-free. As Tim says this is not a problem but if you reach out privately we can change your calculation to use your current testset. That is not recommended though.Cheers,RobbieOn 28 Apr 2023 04:51, Qixu Cai  wrote:Dear all,I'm using the PDB-REDO server to refine my structure. I found that PDB-REDO said that 5% R-free set is too small and it created a new R-free set.Is possible for the PDB-REDO server to keep the original R-free set to make final Rfree value comparable?Best regards,Qixu CaiEmail: caiq...@gmail.com


To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1




To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1



Re: [ccp4bb] PDB redo R free

2023-04-27 Thread Tim Grüne

Dear Qixu Cai,
the sets do not have to be identical, as long as refinement reaches a 
steady state.

Best regards,
Tim

Am 28.04.2023 04:51, schrieb Qixu Cai:

Dear all,

I'm using the PDB-REDO server to refine my structure. I found that
PDB-REDO said that 5% R-free set is too small and it created a new
R-free set.

Is possible for the PDB-REDO server to keep the original R-free set to
make final Rfree value comparable?

Best regards,

Qixu Cai
Email: caiq...@gmail.com

-

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1


--
--
Tim Gruene
Head of the Centre for X-ray Structure Analysis
Faculty of Chemistry
University of Vienna

Phone: +43-1-4277-70202

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/