[cctalk] Re: Antonio's call for donations (was LCM auction)

2024-08-30 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I never thought I would write this, but can we please keep drug induced
Scandemic theories off list.

I would have thought that as a group of technical people we would all have
been capable of thought and could read.

There was a pandemic.  There were vaccines of varying levels of success
developed insanely quickly.  They were succesfull in slowing down
hospitalisation rates, which was all they needed to do.

Humanity is better for them.

If you disagree, please turn your computers over to another list member,
put on a tin hat, and go somewhere else.

By the way, the earth is round...

Sigh...

On Sat, 31 Aug 2024, 5:59 am geneb via cctalk, 
wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Aug 2024, Mychaela Falconia via cctalk wrote:
>
> > Adrian Godwin via cctalk  wrote:
> >
> >> But do the recipients have to be free from all vaccines (would be hard
> to
> >> find an english person who hasn't had the polio or smallpox vaccines) or
> >> only one of the several covid vaccines ?
> >
> > Sorry, my bad for not stating this part explicitly - I meant
> > specifically scamdemic vaccines OR any other vaccine that was
> > administered in the post-scamdemic world.  For non-Covid vaccines,
> > I use the midpoint of 2020 as my rule of thumb - anything before that
> > time point, I consider it safe (unless it was explicitly a Covid vaxx
> > in experimental development), but for anything after that time point,
> > I consider any vaccine injections to be potentially tainted until
> > proven otherwise.
> >
> > I wasn't an antivaxxer prior to the imposition of 2020-March tyranny
> > of evil - but the scamdemic _made_ me into a total antivaxxer now.
> >
>
> You know, next time instead of writing all that text, just write, "I'm a
> complete fucking idiot!"  It means the same thing but takes up so much
> less space.
>
>
> g.
>
> --
> Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
> http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
> http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home.
> Some people collect things for a hobby.  Geeks collect hobbies.
>
> ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
> A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
> http://scarlet.deltasoft.com - Get it _today_!
>


[cctalk] Re: LCM auction

2024-08-29 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
We can unsubscribe?

No -Once you give your email over, it's there forever :-)

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net


On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 13:49, Glen Slick via cctalk
 wrote:
>
> Help. Unsubscibe. Jane, get me off this crazy list.


[cctalk] Re: DOS p-System Pascal: (Was: Saga of CP/M)

2024-05-10 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Circa 1986 I was working at the Research School of Physical Sciences at the
Australian National University.

As late as that we were still running CP/M on an eclictic mix of Imsai8080
and STD Bus based machines.  These were all running laboratory
experiments.

Turbo Pascal was king in that environment.  C compilers were just way too
weird to even consider.  Even when we started rilling out IBM PC's in about
1988, we still used Turbo Pascal.  Re compiling apps for the new platform
was magic...

When I left there and moved into a small packet switching hardware
developed in the mid 90s, we used Turbo pascal for the PC side of any
interface, and Cross compiled C for the 68000/010/020 based hardware plug
in line controllers.  Everything was hosted in a custom VME rack system
running Unix.

C didn't enter my world until I started running FreeBSD in the late 90's
where it was essentially part of the OS.  I remember paying $600 bucks AUD
for a Borland C compiler running under Windows, but the whole concept of
writing a simple app was insane.

Now I use C and C++ regularly for small microcomputers, but still not on my
CP/M systems.

Doug

On Sat, 11 May 2024, 5:01 am Chuck Guzis via cctalk, 
wrote:

> There have been some minor skirmishes in the MCU world over what
> language should be used when programming.
>
> C/C++ is very much top dog, probably because the development suites are
> written for that.
>
> There's a small group that advocates Python; and some say that Ada is
> best.  But they represent a very small segment.
>
> --Chuck
>
>


[cctalk] Re: Turbo Pascal Kermit for CP/M

2024-04-08 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Wow,

I agree that there is clearly an incompatibility - I wonder how?  CP/M
should be CP/M...  Just the BDOS changed for the individual machine
hardware.

One thought is the screen RAM may be an issue with overlaying.

I suspect that Borland didn't notice, as the TRS80 Model 4 was really late
in the 8 bit world, having been released in 1983.  The IBM PC was released
in 1981, so I suspect that by the time somebody ran CP/M on a Model 4,
Borland had moved onto PC/MS-DOS.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net



On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 10:36, Fred Cisin via cctalk 
wrote:

> >> Does the Turbo Pascal run on those machines with trivial source file?
> >> or subsets of the Kermit code?
>
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk wrote:
> > Haven't tried any other programs yet as I really wanted Kermit but
> > none of the other CP/M Kermits work on these machines (at least not
> > so far) but the problem does appear to be that the program is just
> > to big.
> >
> > I just can't believe none of he developers noticed or maybe that
> > was the point where they all gave up.  :-)
>
> Well, there is still the issue of whether it is an incompatability of that
> version of Turbo Pascal with your machines, . . .
>
>
> Are you running with 128K?
> On machines that support it, 128K does NOT give you a TPA ("Transient
> Program Area") larger than 64K, but it does give it almost 64K.
>
> I wonder how large the TPA is on DOS based CP/M emulators, . . . ?
>
>
> . . . and, of course, is there somewhere, a pre-compiled version of Kermit
> for TRS80 CP/M?
>
> --
> Grumpy Ol' Fred ci...@xenosoft.com
>
>
>


[cctalk] Re: Borland Turbo C++ and Turbo Basic - Books and Manuals

2024-04-06 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Having paid personally for a Borland C++ compiler in the Windows 95 days, I
can confirm that the set of books can comfortably elevate a monitor by
about 14" when used as a monitor stand.

On Sun, 7 Apr 2024, 10:27 am geneb via cctalk, 
wrote:

> On Sat, 6 Apr 2024, Mike Norris via cctalk wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Before I consign the following books to be recycled I thought I would
> ask if they are any use to anyone.
> > I do not want anything for them except postage, but they are heavy so
> might be expensive to post from the UK.
> > (These are the manuals only no software)
> >
> > Manuals
> > Borland C++ V4 for Windows - Programmers Guide, User Guide, Library Ref,
> Debugger, DOS Ref, Library Ref
> > Borland C++V2 Object Windows - Reference Guide, Programmers Guide
> > Turbo C++ V3 Object Windows - User Guide, Reference Guide
> > Turbo C++ V3 User Guide
> > Turbo C++ - Library Ref, Getting Started, Programmers Guide, User Guide
> > Resource Workshop
> > Turbo Assembler V2 (5 books in set)
> > Turbo Basic
> >
> > Books
> > The Waite Group Turbo C Bible
> > Developing C++ Software
> >
>
> If you were only in the US. :( I'd buy you *two* beers. ;)
>
> g.
>
> --
> Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
> http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
> http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home.
> Some people collect things for a hobby.  Geeks collect hobbies.
>
> ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
> A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
> http://scarlet.deltasoft.com - Get it _today_!
>


[cctalk] Re: EMP was: oscilloscopes

2024-04-01 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
ASCII Graphic of an EMP:

Much EMF
 _
 | |
 | |
--- -
zero EMF
  t=0   t= very short time


What frequencies would you like  Fourier would suggest that many of
them are there :-)

:-)

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net



On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 16:04, Just Kant via cctalk 
wrote:

> Accordimg to certain individuals on this list, going back a few years,
> electronics/computers can be damaged due to an electrical storm, presumably
> very intense activity, even while off. Go look through the archives.
>
>  I knew people back in the 80s that said they could "torque" certain
> frequencies with a cb radio in the vicinity of a car wash and turn the
> whole joint on! Vending machines are/were said to be similaely vulnerable.
> Such is the basis behind emc testing. I should know. A specific component
> is wrapped with wire say, or is placed in front of various antennas, and
> currents are pumped through or frequencies are directed at the item to see
> if it fails. Or fries (very uncommon). Specifications are provided as to
> what tests need to be conducted, literally, or radiated. If the item fails,
> additional work is required to keep the item in spec so that it doesm't
> fail in the field.
>
>  Which frequencies are present in an EMP I couldn't tell you. But I have
> to believe they delivered with considerable power. I did work like that
> back in the 80s. In general I don't think too much equipment was radiation
> hardened back then. It was believed then the threat would be from a neutron
> bomb. A high altotude emp strike probably wouldn't affect much. But I'd
> certainly be concerned about one in the vicinity of a server farm or a
> military complex may frig up quite a bit. You don't havento knock out
> everyone's electronics in order to frig up a society or crucial portions of
> it. I'm binging Pikard at the moment. Their comms have limited
> effectiveness because relays (repeaters?) don't exist in 2024.
>
>
>
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
>
> On Monday, April 1st, 2024 at 9:46 PM, Christian Kennedy via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> > On 4/1/24 17:42, CAREY SCHUG via cctalk wrote:
> >
> > > Will things like PDAs and tablets, powered off and stored inside steel
> ammo boxes survive?
> >
> >
> > Yes, as will most contemporary electronics, even without elaborate
> > protection.
> >
> > The amount of current induced in a device by EMP is a function of the
> > number and length of conductors; most modern electronics are unlikely to
> > have an issue given relatively short conductor lengths. Automotive
> > ECUs, in particular, are unlikely to be affected, as they're equipped
> > with seriously clamped lines and generally have been tested in lightning
> > simulators (EMP looks like lightning, but EMP has a much faster rise
> > time, much higher voltages, and vastly higher currents); likewise the
> > commercial electrical grid is likely to be largely unaffected due to
> > existing lightning protection. If your device can withstand a nearby
> > lightning strike, it's probably going to survive a high altitude EMP
> event.
> >
> > The biggest problem for semiconductor devices is from neutron flux when
> > under power, hence weird solutions for military systems where a PN diode
> > will be used to trigger a crowbar on the power supply (ionizing
> > radiation arrives well in advance of the neutrons). The upshot is that
> > warfighting systems will recover, although the same probably can't be
> > said for the warfighters.
> >
> > Yes, I spent entirely too much time in this space in my misspent youth.
> >
> > Note that none of this is to suggest that all electronics will survive,
> > but the doom and gloom people associate with high altitude EMP, and
> > Carrington events in particular, are generally overblown.
> >
> > --
> > Christian Kennedy, Ph.D.
> > ch...@mainecoon.com AF6AP | DB0692 | PG00029419
> > http://www.mainecoon.com PGP KeyID 108DAB97
> > PGP fingerprint: 4E99 10B6 7253 B048 6685 6CBC 55E1 20A3 108D AB97
> > "Mr. McKittrick, after careful consideration…"
>


[cctalk] Re: Amoeba OS

2024-03-28 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Ans sway they have in congress to get laws specifically modified for their
benefit...

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024, 1:27 pm Fred Cisin via cctalk, 
wrote:

> >> OTOH, spammer mailing lists, and leaked personal and trade secrets
> >> seem to last forever.
>
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024, ben via cctalk wrote:
> > You forgot Mickey Mouse.
>
> Is the mouse's immortality due to his army of intellectual property
> lawyers?
>
>
>


[cctalk] Re: A little help please

2024-01-31 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Hi Kevin,

Often that is because you signed up using an old email that is forwarded to
your current email - Have a look at the message headers to see which email
it is sending messages to.  You can then log into the list manager with
that email and remove yourself.

it is particularly tricky for me, as I run about 7 different email aliases
depending on the environment I am in at any time.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net



On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 18:41, Kevin Lee via cctalk 
wrote:

> Could someone kindly delete me from this list..
> The mailing list software says it does not know me and yet I am getting
> emails :)
>
> Thanks
> K.
>
> Ps: appreciate the help.
>
>


[cctalk] Re: 6800 fig-FORTH?

2023-12-13 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Hi Stephen,

Sorry to use your Fig Forth thread - I too have a Corsham 6809 system, with
a SD card - I can not for the life of me figure out what files / how to put
stuff onto the SD card to boot - either Basic or Flex/09.

If you had success down the Fig route that would also be great - but do you
remember how to use the SD system?

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net



On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 at 05:16, Stephen Pereira via cctech <
cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I know there's not much 6800 activity here, but I figure this would be
> worth a try.
>
> Has anyone here ever seen or ever had fig-FORTH for the 6800 working?
>
> I have a SWTPC replica system from Bob Applegate / Corsham Technologies,
> and I love it. It came with a complete 64K RAM, as well as the SWIBUG
> monitor, and the monitor code has been extended by Bob/Corsham to interface
> with an SD Card sub-system for floppy disk emulation. This provides the
> original terminal access to the machine with the simple system monitor, and
> also the FLEX OS for running programs. It is a blast to use.
>
> Recently, I took a look around and found the fig-FORTH listing as
> originally published back in 1979, and also a Source Forge site that holds
> an electronic copy:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/asm...th_6800-stuff/ <
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/asm68c/files/fig-forth_6800-stuff/>
>
> I've managed to get the source code to assemble with a cross-assembler
> supplied by Bob/Corsham. It does not produce an exact copy of the original
> code, because the code uses the JMP instruction pretty much exclusively,
> and the assembler substitutes a relative BRA instruction sometimes. So my
> code ends up being several bytes shorter because of saving one byte each
> time a JMP is replaced by a BRA. That said, it appears to me that the code
> matches up with the original listing otherwise.
>
> So my problem is this: When I run the code on my system, fig-FORTH seems
> to sign on, and will accept input from the keyboard (double echos of each
> key typed) but it then does not proceed to interpret the command entered.
> The interesting thing I see by winding my way around in the code is that it
> has already properly performed a bunch of setup and produces the initial
> "Forth-68" sign on, and that has required it to already be using many of
> the Forth commands that were defined by machine language. This indicates to
> me that some of the command interpretation is working. The I/O from/to the
> terminal is by calls to the system monitor I/O routines, and that seems to
> be also working, despite the double echos of the typed characters. It just
> does not proceed to interpret what is typed in at all.
>
> Of course, I have no idea if this code ever worked properly, or if I am
> encountering early buggy code. So I'm looking to see if anyone else has
> ever seen the fig-FORTH working on a 6800 system? Any pointers to good
> working code?
>
> Thanks for listening!
>
> smp
> - - -
> Stephen Pereira
> Bedford, NH  03110
> KB1SXE
>
>
>


[cctalk] Re: SCO on Virtualbox

2023-08-03 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Years ago I had the 5.25" installation floppies and the important yellow
slips of paper with the authorisation keys to install the operating system
and various extensions

Sadly I tossed them when I moved to FreeBSD.

Nowadays - I wonder how useful the installers would be without the licence
/ activation keys?

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net



On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 10:29, jim stephens via cctalk 
wrote:

>
>
> On 8/3/23 13:21, KenUnix via cctalk wrote:
> > My efforts have failed. My host is Ubuntu 22.04 with Virtualbox 7.0.10.
> I'd be curious given the nature of SCO if anyone has posted the goods to
> install any of them, and what versions.
>
> That aside, as mentioned by Grant, the system then was broken down with
> so many bits and pieces with different tariffs on the parts that it was
> a bitch to get one running.  Not only was Linux "free" to get early on,
> but it didn't screw with holding back anything. Not to mention you were
> on your own to fix stuff and contribute to the effort.
>
> I don't know how many engineers SCO had working on support, but once
> Linux took off there were a lot working on it, and later a lot of
> resources to ask for help and support, vs. sending a bug report or
> support request down the black hole at SCO.
>
> I'd certainly try virtualbox, vmware and QEMU to see if it ran.  I'm
> still playing with the latter to get guest networking going, and with
> older NICs on old SCO distributions, you may have some challenges having
> support.  But the 3M controllers seemed to be a hardware universal
> device pre virtualization, and I'd hope any i386 virtualization would
> still have support.
>
> I still have boxes with hopefully SCO install goods, but haven't looked
> into getting them running in a long time.
> thanks
> Jim
>
>


[cctalk] Re: BEWARE: Phishing

2023-07-07 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
To be completely honest, Electrotechnology students with 415v DC bench
supplies and HV caps all learnt very quickly not to catch something when
somebody threw it to you.

Ahhh - The folly of youth :-)

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net



On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 at 09:18, Grant Taylor via cctalk 
wrote:

> On 7/7/23 2:24 PM, Sellam Abraham wrote:
> > How else are we to know that the capacitor is charged, or that the
> > link is dangerous?
> You touch your neighbor with it.  }:-)
>
>
>
> Grant. . . .
>


[cctalk] Re: BEWARE: Phishing

2023-07-06 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Hi Everybody.

It is important to keep everyone aware of phishing attempts, but it's also
important to make sure when you send warning emails to simply delete the
actual URL that the criminals provide so that nobody accidently clicks on
something...

Kind of like making sure that 400V capacitor was discharged before handing
it to your lab mate in class :-)

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net



On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 10:19, KenUnix via cctalk 
wrote:

> Okey Dokey Thanks.
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 7:30 PM Paul Koning via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> wrote:
>
> > You should ignore it, just like all other criminal messages of that kind.
> >
> > paul
> >
> > > On Jul 6, 2023, at 7:16 PM, KenUnix via cctalk 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Chuck,
> > >
> > > So what actions are we supposed to take??
> > >
> > > I was going to go to the cloudflair link but got a message that this
> was
> > a
> > > dangerous site!
> > >
> > > This link looks dangerous
> > > This link opens a site that is likely to be harmful
> > >
> > > Ken
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 6:39 PM Chuck Guzis via cctalk <
> > cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Just got the following message in the account that I use to receive
> > >> cctalk email:
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Hello cclist,
> > >>
> > >> The passwогd to your mailbox (ccl...@sydex.com) expires in 24 hrs
> time.
> > >>
> > >> Following this prompt, your webmail will log you out and generate a
> new
> > >> passwогd.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Alternatively, you can retain and continue using your cuггent
> passwогd,
> > >> by using the user secured button below;
> > >>
> > >> Keep Cuггent Passwогd (link goes to cloudflare-ipfs.com)
> > >>
> > >> This email is generated by sydex.com's mail server for
> ccl...@sydex.com
> > .
> > >>
> 
> > >>
> > >> FYI
> > >> Chuck
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > End of line
> > > JOB TERMINATED -->> Okey Dokey, OK Boss
> >
> >
>
> --
> End of line
> JOB TERMINATED -->> Okey Dokey, OK Boss
>


[cctalk] Re: IMSAI BASIC PROM set?

2023-06-28 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Wait !! - there was BASIC in ROM for the IMSAI?

How was the memory laid out?  What I/O devices did it expect?

Does it run with a Z80 CPU, or only the 8080?

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878



On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 12:51, steve shumaker via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> That would be the Imsai 8K BASIC?  If so, I have the assembler listing
> as part of the Imsai manual set.
>
> Steve
>
> On 6/28/23 7:43 PM, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
> > Anyone have the 2716 ePROM listing for IMSAI Basic.  Version 1.4 or
> > whatever.  I once had it, can't find my copy.  If not 2716, I'll take any
> > listing that I can convert somehow.
> > Thanks
> > Bill
>
>


[cctalk] Re: Magazine no longer in print

2023-04-21 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
That's the crux of it.

Without advertisers magazines are too expensive.   As advertisers needs
change they move to diferent media.

It's frustrating.  But part of the world in which we live.

On Sat, 22 Apr 2023, 12:34 pm Wayne S via cctalk, 
wrote:

> Not progress just consolidation of the pc manufacturing industry. They
> lost most of their advertising last year so most of their revenue. Most
> print publications have done the same.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Apr 21, 2023, at 19:30, Bill Degnan via cctalk 
> wrote:
> >
> > I saved a few years of that one, my favorite for a while
> > B
> >
> >> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023, 10:09 PM Tarek Hoteit via cctalk <
> >> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Such progress should never stop. I keep buying old magazines (creative
> >> computing, compute!, Byte, Omni, and more) via eBay and randomly pick
> one
> >> to read each day. It is  always a great feeling to read the actual
> >> magazines as if it were the eighties (or late seventies)
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Tarek Hoteit
> >>
> >>> On Apr 21, 2023, at 6:59 PM, Murray McCullough via cctalk <
> >> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I read today that “Maximum PC” is no longer in print just in digital.
> >> Past
> >>> issues are available in digitized format but it’s not the same as
> >> reading a
> >>> magazine while in bed! Our hobby is changing. Well, progress must not
> be
> >>> stopped…
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Happy computing.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Murray  🙂
> >>
>


[cctalk] Re: Store with "vintage" computers and parts

2023-02-09 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
At this point I will chime in.

I brought what looked like an Imsai keyboard from this crowd, or a previous
version of them - The web site is *amazingly* similar.

The keyboards were cheap as chips,  $149, so I went for it, knowing that I
was protected by PayPal.

I get tracking details pretty quickly, set as awaiting shipment, I also got
a weird - non professional email saying that they had sent the item.

After a week, still no movement on the tracking item - I queried them and
got yet another number.  Still awaiting shipment.

Another couple of weeks - no movement, no keyboard delivered, and no
response from their customer service, so I contacted Paypal and raised a
case.  At this point, I am screenshotting everything for evidence.

Paypal was great - they contacted the seller, who said that the item was
shipped.   Another new tracking number.

After another couple of weeks,  I contacted Paypal again - they contacted
the shop - the shop provided 'evidence' that the item had been delivered to
Sydney (350km away) - Paypal asked me if I had it - I live in Canberra, and
of course I hadn't got it.

They clearly went to the trouble of trawling through USPS tracking details
to find something that was shipped from near their suburb to Sydney
Australia by somebody else and submitted it as their evidence they had
shipped.

I went ballistic with paypal, and got a refund.

100% would not recommend.

The only shops that pop up in a town selling impossible vintage bargains
are in the Twilight Zone, and have the word Emporium in their name.




Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net





On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 09:13, Adrian Godwin via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 7:14 PM Eric Moore via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I am very sorry to anyone I insulted. My tone was condescending. My only
> > intention was sincere concern for any fellow travellers who may be
> reading.
> >
> >
> Without your comment, I wouldn't have got the chuckle from Fred's :).
>


[cctalk] Re: 1975 Homebrew Computer Club Newsletter

2023-02-02 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I love the small note about Steve Wozniak in the second magazine...  lots
of hardware experience - Time poor :-)

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net



On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 at 08:34, Tarek Hoteit via cctalk 
wrote:

> One website has an archive of the first Homebrew Computer Club
> newsletters. The newsletter is associated with the Homebrew club that
> kicked off the personal computer revolution
>
>  https://arkive.net/gallery/homebrew-computer-club
>
> Regards,
> Tarek Hoteit
>


[cctalk] Re: HP 41-CX

2023-02-02 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I would be interested in it - Happy to pay postage to Australia, and a bit
for the machine ;-)

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878



On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 20:42, David Brownlee via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> I had some idea of trying to get money for an HP 41-CX a while back,
> but on balance I think it's best to just go to someone who might be
> interested in fixing it up and valuing it for what it is.
>
> So - FTGH, just the cost of shipping (photo link below still valid)
>
> David
>
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 17:55, David Brownlee  wrote:
> >
> > I've come into possession of an HP 41-CX calculator - unfortunately it
> > appears to have had batteries left in it which have left corrosion on
> > the internal contacts.
> >
> > (some pics: https://photos.app.goo.gl/48bE7WJZP8R4PF9a9 )
> >
> > My classic hardware tendencies tend to run more towards the "can run
> > *nix" end, and while I could just clean it up and throw it on eBay I
> > wondered if anyone here has a 41C shaped soft spot and would be
> > interested? (happy to trade/part trade for something they already have
> > for which they are less fond if that works :)
> >
> > David
>


[cctalk] Re: cctalk archives not updating

2023-01-28 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
This may be a pertinent message from 11 July 2022.

I use Gmail, so I never delete email - It's all stored for me.  Forever.


--
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 01:38:36 -0400
From: Dennis Boone 
Subject: List migration
To: cctalk@classiccmp.org, cct...@classiccmp.org
Message-ID: <20220711053836.b91b93fb...@yagi.h-net.msu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Friends,

The process of migrating the cctalk and cctech mailing lists to a new host in
Chicago is underway.  This evening, I've moved the list mail handling to
the new server, and this message will be the first live test.  Assuming
this works, you shouldn't have to change anything to post to the list.

The green web pages, the old "pipermail" list archives, and web access to
archives of new postings from this point still require a little work, which
I hope to complete in the next day or two.  I will eventually import the
old pipermail archives into the new posting archive, but that may take a
little longer.

The new hosting is provided by the Chicago Classic Computing group.

Many thanks to Jay West for hosting the lists for 20 years!

/Dennis Boone



Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 at 15:06, Fred Cisin via cctalk 
wrote:

> On Sat, 28 Jan 2023, Patrick Finnegan via cctalk wrote:
> > It's being run by someone else, since Jay has retired from the hosting
> > business, and didn't want to keep running it. I'm not sure what else
> there
> > is to say.
>
> 1) Is Jay OK?
> Was the retirement by choice?  not health or circumstances?
> Does he have big plans for his retirement?   Such as hobbies, travelling,
> or sitting on the porch chasing the kids off of the lawn?
>
>
> 2) There should be acknowledgement of those behind the curtain, who keep
> it all running for us!
>
>
> --
> Grumpy Ol' Fred ci...@xenosoft.com
>
>


[cctalk] Re: what is on topic?

2022-12-20 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Off topic - but interesting.

I had a very frustrating experience with an 80188 made by Innovasic.

The SBC188 BIOS would halt if the chip was used because its power on
behaviour was different to the Intel 80188.

http://www.vk1zdj.net/?p=551

That's *many* hours of my life I won't get back.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net



On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 14:53, Chris via cctalk 
wrote:

>  Vadem made 186 clones? They made dense glue for V40 based Ampro sbc's.
> Never knew they made cpus. Not saying they didn't, but if so that's a
> shocker to me.
>
>
>  On Tuesday, December 20, 2022, 10:22:18 PM EST, Cameron Kaiser via
> cctalk  wrote:
>
>  > I agree that we should probably use the intent of a specific era.
> >
> > I believe that the world certainly dropped out of my personal definition
> of
> > 'Classic' when the 386 came in.
> >
> > I have an interest in things up to and including 80186, and they
> certainly
> > are not run of the mill.
>
> Something like the HP LX series or even the portable ZEOS DOS palmtops
> would
> probably be on-topic. The OmniGo 100LX behind me has a Vadem equivalent of
> an
> 80186.
>
> --
>  personal:
> http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
>   Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com *
> ckai...@floodgap.com
> -- Beware the Lollipop of Mediocrity: lick it once, and you suck forever!
> -
>
>


[cctalk] Re: what is on topic?

2022-12-20 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I agree that we should probably use the intent of a specific era.

I believe that the world certainly dropped out of my personal definition of
'Classic' when the 386 came in.

I have an interest in things up to and including 80186, and they certainly
are not run of the mill.

Just my thoughts.

Doug Jackson






On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 13:13, Mike Loewen via cctalk 
wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Dec 2022, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
>
> > On Dec 20, 2022, at 2:27 PM, Chris via cctalk 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Specifically as pertaining to old/vintage/classic/retro compuing
> discussion, what exactly is on topic? On top of my head as a for imstance I
> have some questions pertaining to Windows 2003 and socket 603/604.
> Something tells me that doesn't qualify, so it behooves me to ask.
> >
> > The original rule, back around ?96/97 was anything older than 10 years
> was on-topic.  I think the idea behind that is still valid, but these days
> a 10 year old system isn?t that much different from a current one.  I think
> at one point someone suggested it should be shifted to 20+ years.
>
> I'm going to play the old fogey card and suggest that we should use a
> specific year as a cutoff, rather than a floating limit. Something like
> 1986,
> or possibly a little later. As has been mentioned, there are many other
> outlets for discussions about Windoze machines and i386+ systems.
>
>
> Mike Loewen mloe...@cpumagic.scol.pa.us
> Old Technology  http://q7.neurotica.com/Oldtech/
>


[cctalk] Re: Bubble Memory

2022-10-21 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
It is disappointing that you have encountered people like that.

My most recent purchase was a couple of potentiometers for a Kenwood TS440
radio - made from true Unobtanium.

from memory, I paid $100 USD for the auction and $70 USD for the shipping.
They shipped through the Ebay global shipping system which is a rip off,
but the people who filled in the forms were the global shipping people.
The sellers experience was that they simply sent the package to an address
in the states.

My experience was that I got the item I was happy to pay for.  I didn't
complain about the shipping, because some people understand that sending
stuff costs money..

The alternative that I use is a US on-shipping firm MyUSA.com, but I try
not to use them anymore, as they had a meltdown because they thought I was
trying to get them to onship an ITAR controlled item (A satellite
antenna).  They couldn't read the government's own doco, where part number
xxx-xxx-xxx-xxx-01 was ITAR, while xxx-xxx-xxx-xxx-02 was not ITAR
controlled.  In that case, I got them to ship it back to the seller, who
onshipped it (again at my expense) to a friend, who shipped it for me.

My comment was simply based on my experience, as a purchaser who is quite
happy to pay through the nose, because I understand that a plane flight to
the States costs much more than anybodies shipping.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net




On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 06:51, Doc Shipley via cctalk 
wrote:

> On 10/20/22 20:15, Doug Jackson via cctalk wrote:
> > Sigh...
> >
> > Yet another American seler who doesn't understand how simple overseas
> > shipping is.
>
>
> Oh, we understand, we really do.  We also get really tired of strangers
> asking us to lie, on paper, to foreign government agencies.
>
> We understand why that's "necessary".  We understand that customs duties
> in most other countries are insane.  We understand that the chances of
> getting caught twiddling our declaration is minimal, and the odds of
> prosecution are even less.
>
> NONE of that makes taking that risk tenable for a person who hasn't
> earned my trust.
>
> My main, issue, though, is the response from prospective recipients when
> I say I won't falsify customs forms. It's usually something like "Don't
> be such a wimp."
>
> That's the behavior that makes me REALLY want not to ship overseas.
>
>
> Doc
>


[cctalk] Re: Bubble Memory

2022-10-20 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Sigh...

Yet another American seler who doesn't understand how simple overseas
shipping is.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net




On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 03:12, Douglas Taylor via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On 10/19/2022 5:49 PM, Anders Nelson via cctalk wrote:
> > On eBay, 10pcs for $75: https://www.ebay.com/itm/394216367144
> >
> > =]
> > --
> > Anders Nelson
>
> This reminded me that I have a qbus Bubble Tek (or something) board in
> my collection.  It emulates an RX01 device, however it uses the Intel
> 7110 bubble memory and contains 1M bit of data. That is 128 KB!
>
> Formatted you get a 128KB RX01, and you thought the 256KB RX01 was a
> small space to work in.
>
> Doug
>
>
>


Re: Retire cctech

2022-07-13 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Hi Dennis,

That makes complete sense - All of my cc* related emails get forwarded into
a single folder here anyway.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 08:01, Dennis Boone via cctalk 
wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I've belatedly realized that it's going to be a bit of a headache to
> implement the old cctalk/cctech crossposting duality under the new
> version of mailman.
>
> I seem to recall a discussion about retiring the cctech list and just
> continuing with cctalk, and that the consensus was in favor of that.
>
> I'll call this message a consent agenda indicating that I plan to do
> that, unless there's loud outcry.
>
> De
>


Re: DEC VT52 CRT anode connection

2022-02-23 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Hmm - Depends on where that pesky ground connection is put :-)  (Duck)


Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878




On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 at 12:55, Chris Zach via cctalk 
wrote:

> > Nice job, but isn't the 7915 the negative regulator?
>
> Whoops :-)
>
> >
> > --Chuck
> >
>


Re: tamayatech let down

2021-12-26 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
"worked the last time used but no guarantees and are sold as is"

Reminds me of the test and tag rip-off that has been embedded in
legislation.

It was OK when we tested it at 3pm on Tuesday afternoon Your Honor.

Gone are the days of personal accountability.

On Mon, 27 Dec 2021, 2:50 pm Ali via cctalk,  wrote:

> > Epay has messed the definitions up into a useless mess.
> >
> > I'd expect  a vendor not selling on such to actually test the items.
> > Whether they are warranted is a separate issue.
> >
> > On ebay they've screwed over sellers to the point that it's all but
> > wasting time to list there unless you sell either really new stock, or
> > list as parts, junk only.
> >
> > Any attempt to describe the item as refurbished will mean most buyer
> > will claim a problem, Ebay will refund them and screw you.
>
> Not sure what you mean here. Refurbished means that a seller has brought
> an item to the original operating specs and that the item will operate as
> it should. This is also eBay's meaning of refurbished. So I am not sure why
> you think they "screwed" it up.
>
> The problem on eBay is that a seller will pull something out of a box that
> has been sitting on a shelf in the warehouse, at most hit it with some
> compressed air to get rid of dust, describe it as "refurbished" and list it
> for an exorbitant price. Whether it works or functions as intended is of no
> concern to them. With some electronics you can get away with this - simple
> add-on boards from the IBM PC era for example. Most of the time they will
> work and if it doesn't well prices or so jacked up that one
> non-refunded/completed sale will turn enough profit to cover the original
> S&H (which is usually the sellers actual real loss) on ten returns and
> still return a profit. With PSUs, whole systems, stuff with batteries this
> practice is more likely not to work.
>
> Of course my personal favorites are the seller refurbished items that
> "worked the last time used but no guarantees and are sold as is". LOL.
> Makeup your mind is it refurbished or is it junk?
>
> -Ali
>
>


Re: Found my favorite DOS editor

2021-09-28 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I spent years working in field service, and this was a conversation I had
multiple times per day...

Me: Silently types 'vi ' or 'edlin ' depending on the platform
Client:  Wow you still use  - You should use Qedit12005b
its the best!
me:  But the next client I visit won't have  Qedit12005b, so I would have
to install it.
Client:  .

Got monotonous after a bit.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson




On Wed, 29 Sept 2021 at 13:58, Chuck Guzis via cctalk 
wrote:

> On 9/28/21 8:37 PM, John Herron via cctalk wrote:
> > For those of you who wrote your own editors. How did you display special
> > ASCII characters? Years ago, In highschool I tried writing a hex editor
> (in
> > qbasic so this may have been the problem) but when display anything that
> > had a function like chr 07 it would activate instead of display. I gave
> up
> > since I couldn't figure it out other than writing directly to video
> memory.
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021, 8:13 PM Van Snyder via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 2021-09-28 at 15:49 -0700, Guy Sotomayor via cctalk wrote:
> >>> Since EMACS has a full programming language (elisp), you can write
> >>> anything you want in it (mail readers, browsers, calendar apps, other
> >>> editors, etc)
> >>
> >> Years ago, one of my colleagues showed me a pocket reference card
> >> jesting about "hello world."
> >>
> >> At the end of the description of "GNU hello" was a remark "and like any
> >> self-respecting program, it has a built-in mail reader."
>
> Mine was in assembly and Ctrol-V signified a literal character, no
> matter what it was.  Wordstar has a similar feature, IIRC.
>
> Of course, all of the I/O string handling was count+data, not "delimeted
> by null", so that made it easier.
>
> --Chuck
>
>


Re: Anyone remember Kel-Am connectors?

2021-08-26 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
We can synthesise those with a Female edge connector and a nice Gold Plated
set of long fingers.

I agree - those connectors were beautiful and very useful in the days of
barely adequately buffered signals slapped onto a tin plated PCB edge
connector.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878




On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 05:40, Fred Cisin via cctalk 
wrote:

> > On 8/25/21 2:29 AM, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
> >> When I worked at Apparat around 1981, we used a lot of *male* IDC edge
> card
> >> connectors. I've almost never seen any since, and I couldn't remember
> the
> >> name of the vendor. I just found out that it was Kel-Am, but the
> internet
> >> knows almost nothing about them.
> >>
> >> Here's an example:
> >>
> https://www.elliottelectronicsupply.com/connectors/card-edge/male-card-edge-idc-connector-34-position-kel-am-idc34m.html
> >>
> >> T
> >
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2021, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote:
> > We still use a lot of KEL connectors, originally sold in the US under
> the
> > Robinson-Nugent brand, then acquired by 3M.  Here's the right-angle
> > board-mount connector :
> >
> > https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/3m/P50E-068P1-SR1-EA/1802260
> >
> > Here's the IDC crimp cable end.
> >
> > https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/3m/P25E-068S-EA/1802218
> >
> > I assume this is the same company.
>
> It may be a lead on where Kel-Am went to, . . .
> But what Eric was asking about was a MALE card edge connector, and those
> are FEMALE.
>
> In his time at Apparat, floppy drives (5.25") had a 34 pin card edge
> connector.  If the drive was in a case, it meant opening the case every
> time for connecting.  So, Kel-Am made a MALE IDC 34 pin card edge
> connector that could go on a short ribbon cable to a FEMALE IDC 34 pin
> card edge connector to act as a short extension, to bring the connection
> out of the case.
>
> IDC MALE card edge is a R@RE connector type.
>
> --
> Grumpy Ol' Fred ci...@xenosoft.com
>


Re: Melted computer feet

2021-05-19 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I use any of the 'Orange' based goo gone type cleaners for labels.

Be careful to have an absorbent tissue.  Once the black goo has been
dissolved, mop it up quickly - otherwise in the next few weeks you will
find black smears everywhere wnd wonder where they came from.


Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 10:52, David Collins via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> Goo Gone is one option but may harm the plastic case.
>
> Orange based cleaners are also good - the ones that remove stickers etc
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On 20 May 2021, at 10:50 am, Zane Healy via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >
> > Is there any recommended method for cleaning up melted “rubber” feet on
> a plastic case?
> >
> > I’m trying to determine if I can revive the VAXstation 4000/90 I
> received from a list member, back around 1998 (it’s never worked).  When I
> pulled it out, I discovered that its feet have melted, and I’m assuming
> probably made a mess on the disk enclosure for my VAXstation 3100 that it
> was on top of.
> >
> > Zane
> >
> >
> >
>


Re: Apple II PSU

2021-05-11 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Dwight.

That smells like one of the Rifa caps.  Thick brown smoke.

Or was it one of the big electros?

On Wed, 12 May 2021, 12:59 am dwight via cctalk, 
wrote:

> The rivets are likely more of a safety thing than an issue warrantee
> repair thing. The inside of a Apple II is intended to have user access. The
> switching supply has 300 to 400V DC inside. Definitely a potential lethal
> hazard.
> I hate those filter caps. I had one go at the last Maker Faire ( no more
> 🙁 ). I was trying out the Oregon trail when the nasty smoke started
> pouring out. Luckily we had a drill handy to remove the rivets.
> Dwight
>
>
> 
> From: cctalk  on behalf of David Williams
> via cctalk 
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 5:34 PM
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Apple II PSU
>
> On 2021-05-10 18:18, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
> > This area is so backward, that metric drill bits are considered
> > esoteric!
> >
> > 1/8" works OK, and will chuck in a Dremel.
> >
> > If it were a damaged screw, rather than a rivet, I would use a
> > left-handed drill bit.
>
> Which is pretty much what I ended up with. Surprised that this unit
> looks in such good shape inside, I expected to see it already exploded.
>
> Well time to get to work on it now and see if I can't get a working unit
> out of it.
>
> David Williams
> www.trailingedge.com
>


Re: That VAXStation4000vlc 3W3 video connector

2021-05-03 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Hi Paul,

I also found an example of the HD BNC connector - It is interesting.

https://au.element14.com/amphenol-rf/095-850-188m050/rf-coax-hd-bnc-plug-hd-bnc-plug/dp/2766835?CMP=KNC-GAU-GEN-DSA-PDP-PAGE&mckv=s_dc|pcrid|435342446135|pkw||pmt|b|slid||product||pgrid|98446732062|ptaid|dsa-922446159331|&gclid=Cj0KCQjwvr6EBhDOARIsAPpqUPGZY4Ngl7SU6FHq9pxKQ8X19QmsxNvM0S6tFazGERm0QBSNbwd46fUaAjkZEALw_wcB


Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 15:50, Doug Jackson  wrote:

> HI Paul,
>
> "I don't know what "HD BNC" means.  There's only one BNC"
>
> Years ago when working in a university with Photomultiplier tubes, we used
> HV BNC connectors - these looked like standard BNC, but were rated at 10kv.
>
>
> https://www.radiall.com/products/rf-coaxial-connectors/high-voltage-connectors/bnc-ht-mhv.html
>
> We also used to use 75 Ohm BNC connectors for video systems.
>
>
> https://www.hubersuhner.com/en/products/radio-frequency/connectors-adapters/bayonet-connectors-bnc/bnc-75-real
>
> It is worth noting that there are multiple BNC connectors.
>
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Doug Jackson
>
> em: d...@doughq.com
> ph: 0414 986878
>
> Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
> Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net
>
> ---
>
> Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
> with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
> your own use.
>
> Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
> been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.
>
> Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
> imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
> moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
> result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
> case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
> liability. :-)
>
> Be nice to your parents.
>
> Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
> radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
> happy.
>
> ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
> sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 15:30, Paul Koning via cctalk 
> wrote:
>
>> I don't know what "HD BNC" means.  There's only one BNC.  By 3W3 do you
>> mean the D-sub shell with 3 coax inserts?  Those are standard items, you
>> could just buy one.  The only problem you might encounter is that the cable
>> connector kind is probably crimped, and the crimp tooling is likely
>> expensive.  But a solder or PC mount connector could be used, with an
>> impedance bump that can be ignored for video applications.
>>
>> Sync on green is the usual from DEC.
>>
>> paul
>>
>> > On May 3, 2021, at 7:22 PM, Adam Thornton via cctech <
>> cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > I assume it would be way too much to hope that HD BNC would fit it?
>> Does
>> > anyone have a pointer to the actual physical dimensions of the
>> itty-bitty
>> > BNC-ish connector in the video port of the VAXStation4000vlc?  If I can
>> get
>> > red, green, and blue out (assuming since there are only 3 connectors
>> it's
>> > sync-on-green) I can put together a sync splitter and turn it into
>> VGA.  I
>> > have at least one decent multisync VGA monitor still, although none with
>> > the RGB BNC inputs.
>> >
>> > Adam
>>
>>


Re: That VAXStation4000vlc 3W3 video connector

2021-05-03 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
HI Paul,

"I don't know what "HD BNC" means.  There's only one BNC"

Years ago when working in a university with Photomultiplier tubes, we used
HV BNC connectors - these looked like standard BNC, but were rated at 10kv.

https://www.radiall.com/products/rf-coaxial-connectors/high-voltage-connectors/bnc-ht-mhv.html

We also used to use 75 Ohm BNC connectors for video systems.

https://www.hubersuhner.com/en/products/radio-frequency/connectors-adapters/bayonet-connectors-bnc/bnc-75-real

It is worth noting that there are multiple BNC connectors.


Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 15:30, Paul Koning via cctalk 
wrote:

> I don't know what "HD BNC" means.  There's only one BNC.  By 3W3 do you
> mean the D-sub shell with 3 coax inserts?  Those are standard items, you
> could just buy one.  The only problem you might encounter is that the cable
> connector kind is probably crimped, and the crimp tooling is likely
> expensive.  But a solder or PC mount connector could be used, with an
> impedance bump that can be ignored for video applications.
>
> Sync on green is the usual from DEC.
>
> paul
>
> > On May 3, 2021, at 7:22 PM, Adam Thornton via cctech <
> cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >
> > I assume it would be way too much to hope that HD BNC would fit it?  Does
> > anyone have a pointer to the actual physical dimensions of the itty-bitty
> > BNC-ish connector in the video port of the VAXStation4000vlc?  If I can
> get
> > red, green, and blue out (assuming since there are only 3 connectors it's
> > sync-on-green) I can put together a sync splitter and turn it into VGA.
> I
> > have at least one decent multisync VGA monitor still, although none with
> > the RGB BNC inputs.
> >
> > Adam
>
>


Re: head alignment tape

2021-03-30 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I will never know - They use some sort of filter that prevents access from
Australia.

Perhaps somebody would like to post the photo and description

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 22:02, Jos Dreesen via cctalk 
wrote:

>
>
> Does this head alignment tape need saving ?
>
>
>
> https://www.tutti.ch/de/vi/zuerich/computer-zubehoer/komponenten-zubehoer/5-stk-vintage-computer-tapes-memorex-pericomp-etc/43582741
>
>
> I'd be inclined to think that the alignment tape would suffer to same
> issues as all old tapes, but then this is rare enough to be mentioned here.
>
>
> Jos
>
>


Re: KL11 asynchronous serial line interface on eBay

2021-01-05 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Well,

That went quickly.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 02:45, Lars Brinkhoff via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> Always jarring to see KL... and then not 10 after!
>


Re: michael Holley?

2020-12-25 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Oh no.

I wonder what it was this time.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 04:29, Mike Douglas via cctalk 
wrote:

> ...and SWTPC.ORG is gone again.
>
> Mike
>


Re: WTB: CompuPro / Godbout RAM 17

2020-12-15 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I could never get my head around Golf...   except when the drinks cart
came..  then it was fun.  :-p

On Wed, 16 Dec. 2020, 12:05 pm Bill Gunshannon via cctalk, <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On 12/15/20 7:40 PM, jim stephens via cctalk wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/15/2020 3:40 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk wrote:
> >> When I was down at Ft. Gordon for a summer we bought a brand
> >> new set of golf clubs for my wife for $400 so she could play
> >> when when came down to visit me.
> >
> > Seems like the golf clubs would be the hard to sell outside the pro golf
> > channel for full price.
>
> Didn't ask full price,  Asked for $150 and then lowered it to $100.
> 25% of the retail price.
>
> >  They usually are matched to the buyer by
> > someone at a pro shop, and then customized.  If you didn't do that, the
> > buyers' would think you did, and expect to have to do something.
>
> Dick's sells these things every day.  Very few recreational golfers
> have custom clubs.  And they make up probably 98% of the golfers.
> That summer I played golf 6 to seven days a week.  I have never had
> even one custom club.
>
>
> bill
>
>


Re: misc stuff - free

2020-12-15 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
That's the beauty of the Internet, infinite overlapping groups.

My view is post it everywhere - I understand how to use the  key :-)

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 20:41, Liam Proven via cctalk 
wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 10:35, Johan Helsingius via cctalk
>  wrote:
> >
> > Seems to be the usual FB problem - too many similar groups. :)
>
> How do you mean? Has it already appeared in some I'm not in?
>
> It's nothing new. 15y ago or something, there were umpteen Communities
> on Livejournal for any conceivable subject or interest -- most created
> by kids without the wits to check for others' before creating their
> own.
>
> --
> Liam Proven – Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
> Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk – gMail/gTalk/gHangouts: lpro...@gmail.com
> Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn/Flickr: lproven – Skype: liamproven
> UK: +44 7939-087884 – ČR (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053
>


Re: evil thing to ask but I need keystroke logger

2020-11-20 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Have you considered asking them what they are doing?

You would be surprised how much logging various software packages do.
There are always chat logs (unless deleted) - always usage logs - unless
deleted.

Work with them as a first instance, failing that have them do the work
physically beside you.

Most traffic coming out of PCs these days is SSL encrypted, and you are not
likely to extract meaningful data from a session.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 19:26, Boris Gimbarzevsky via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> If it's a windoze system, modified a bare-bones keylogger about 10
> years ago which records all keystrokes (can get time of key_press,
> key_release) and also monitors all mouse clicks as well as  title of
> window clicked on.  Can also record every mouse event which takes up
> a LOT of disk space.  Just hooks keyboard and mouse events and works
> even on hospital systems which are fairly locked down.  Written in
> VB6 and also wrote a program to either look at keyboard/mouse events
> over time or to dump text typed in.  Has saved lots of work for me as
> windoze has a bad habit of crashing when I'm 20 minutes into writing
> a note and can get all keystrokes that were saved to disk during this
> time.  Initially written to find out how much time I spent
> IFOK.  Also has a stealth mode where keylogger window hidden and can
> be brought up with a key sequence and then need a password to stop
> it.  Not very stealthy as can be easily terminated through ProcessExplorer.
>
> Could always use Wireshark to capture all packets exchanged while
> they're on computer.
>
>
> >I have kids that after corona are in lockdown, so they are on
> >computers all the time.
> >Supposed to be doing schoolwork, but no, feedback from the school is
> negative.
> >
> >Can I trap some traffic from these PC's and what software would you
> recommend?
> >
> >Randy
>
>
>


Re: R65F11

2020-10-27 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Dwight,

I would be very interested in your NC4016 experience.  I did collect a
NC4016 STD bus board a while ago from ePay, and have successfully spoken to
it via a terminal - It would be fun to add storage, but I have no idea
where to start :-)

And no doco..:-/

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 03:00, dwight via cctalk 
wrote:

> I have one of the NC4016 boards ( I forget which one ). I added a XT
> floppy controller and a XT MFM disk controller. I made some other hardware
> for doing byte stuff faster. Using address -1, I could access it faster as
> a short literal. I had a 8 bit barrel shifter there. It came in handy for
> the XT controllers. The processor was fast enough that I had to add delays
> to the code to the floppy controller. It would run faster than the floppy
> controller could provide status. Still, I was using it with direct
> processor access and the controller was really expected to be used with a
> DMA transfers in a XT computer. The MFM hard drive controller was much
> easier to deal with.
>  National also had a bunch of stackable computer modules. One of these
> modules had the NSC800 processor with a Forth ROM built in.
>  Rockwell liked Forth and used it quite a bit in their development system
> as well as having it on their AIM 65 machines.
> Dwight
>
> 
> From: cctalk  on behalf of TangentDelta
> via cctalk 
> Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 5:29 PM
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: R65F11
>
> Rockwell also had an RSC-FORTH Kernel and development environment ROM set
> for the R6501Q, which is a similar 6502-based processor meant for embedded
> applications.
>
> http://www.smallestplcoftheworld.org/RSC-FORTH_User%27s_Manual.pdf
>
> Here's the RSC-FORTH manual, which covers the different types of RSC-FORTH.
>


Re: R65F11

2020-10-25 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
WOW!!

I Have one of those ETI boards, and I based my final Electronics
Engineering project on its big brother, the 65F12.

>From memory, I spent days trying to understand why you had to issue a HEX
1800 MEMTOP command before using the disk.  ETI Suggested that it was
because the system had to know where the top of memory was, but it was
because of a bug in that version of the kernel.

The 65F11 had all of the headless primitive in kernel rom, and used a
development ROM that contained the higher level words.   I Loved the
concept, but the silicon was expensive and as it turned out, rara.  Nobody
knows anything about these chips.

At Uni, we hav Novix NC4016 dev boards with FDD support - they were FAST...
One cycle could see the CPU read the next instruction, write a byte to the
stack, and write a byte to I/O - all because it used three (or 4) separate
busses.

I'm here in Australia, and would merrily give it a home. :-)

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 05:41, Will Cooke via cctalk 
wrote:

>
> > On 10/25/2020 11:58 AM Guy N. via cctalk  wrote:
> >
> >
> > Anyone remember the R65F11? It's a Forth microcontroller: 6502
> > processor with a Forth kernel in ROM, from the mid '80s.
> >
>
> Your hometown magazine, ETI, ran several articles about it at irregular
> intervals.  The first was a development board in May 85:
> https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Electronics-Today/Australia/80s/ETI%201985-05%20May.pdf
>
> In Dec 85 they added a disk drive:
>
> https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Electronics-Today/Australia/80s/ETI%201985-12%20December.pdf
>
> Will
>


Re: The weird stuff I keep finding: 19 bit core memory?

2020-10-21 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Those of us late to the party may like to know:

1.  What was AL
2. Why was it famous?
3. Tell us more about Doug, and his apartment :-)

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 18:05, Lars Brinkhoff via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> Chris Zach wrote:
> > Did AI use MA10 memory boxes?
>
> No.  It had the original 256K "moby" from Fabri-Tek, and another 256K
> from Ampex.  The associated PDP-6 had an older DEC Type 16x-something
> 16K memory.
>
> > Did any of that stuff survive?
>
> Maybe bits and pieces here and there.  The AI KA10 went to Concourse,
> and then it was lost.
>


Re: Firing up the pdt11. Dec put 5 volts on an LED?????

2020-10-11 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Could it have been a 5V LED with integral current limit?

That would explain the odd behaviour.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 14:33, Chris Zach via cctalk 
wrote:

> Ok, this is weirder: I put the "bad" floppy drive on the bench and
> started to take a look at it. First I checked the LED (yes, it's an
> LED). With a bench voltage of 1.5 volts and a 100ma draw it lit up
> nicely in the IR (detected by phone camera, so nice they can see the
> light) and the photo transistor also seemed to work fine (at the sector
> hole resistance went from infinite down to about 500 ohms). That's good,
> so what is wrong?
>
> I noticed I could crank the LED higher current-wise to 150 ma and the
> voltage was still <2 volts. Interesting. Then I hooked a break-out
> harness to the pdt11 to see what kind of voltage it was putting out to
> the LED.
>
> It's putting out +5v whenever the unit is on. Maybe it's current
> limited? To check I hooked up the drive's plug to the breakout to see
> what the LED was seeing.
>
> +5v. And even weirder, the LED was not lit.
>
> What the heck is going on here?
>
> So I put the LED on the bench for a bit of a destructive test.
> Disconnected the PDT11 from the breakout cable, hooked up the power
> supply, turned up the voltage and the LED came on, then went *off* at
> around 3v. At 5v it was dead off, no IR light as measured by the camera.
> Turn the voltage down, and it comes on again. Up and it goes off.
>
> And unfortunately at 9v it died (CRAP!) as I turned up the current limit
> Yes, I forgot to set the voltage limit on the power supply, my bad, I am
> boo boo the fool...
>
> But this is weird: It looks like DEC put an LED in there with no current
> limiting, and a straight +5 volts. And the LED is always on at this high
> voltage? With no current limiting resistor? This does not make sense,
> but the volt meter don't lie. I'm going to check the working drive to
> see if it is limiting the voltage somehow. I'd say there was a resistor
> in the LED assembly limiting the current, but if that's true my cranking
> the voltage to 9v should not have blown it up, and it should not turn on
> at low voltages then off at 5v.
>
> Maybe the solution is to insert a resistor in series with the second
> drive at around r=e/i or r=5/.1 (100ma) or 50 ohms.
>
> Does this make any sense?
>
> C
>


Re: AW: CGA card (Mitsubishi Electric) with 192K RAM?

2020-09-08 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I recall some of the high end cards in the CGA / EGA era had adon boards
that were connected with a 20 or 36 pin jumper cable across the top of the
boards - They also ran more than 64K or ram, such as the ATI Wonder
boards.  Maybe it's like that - the ATI boards had 256K so they could page.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 9:04 AM Fred Cisin via cctalk 
wrote:

> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020, Jules Richardson via cctalk wrote:
> > OK, it boots off a DOS 3.3 floppy if that floppy is inserted before it
> > attempts to boot from the hard disk. If I wait for it to do its "system
> file
> > not found" bit, followed by a subsequent prompt to insert boot media and
> > press a key, it attempts to access the floppy drive but then goes off
> into
> > la-la land. Odd.
>
> How large is the drive?
> If it is over 32MB, then try to find DOS 3.31 or newer.
> MY preference is MS-DOS 6.22
>
>
> > But anyway, taking the successful floppy boot route, I can certainly
> access
> > the hard disk in terms of bringing up directory listings and TYPEing
> files to
> > the display. So far, attempts to run anything from the drive just result
> in a
> > lock-up (keyboard immediately unresponsive, hard reset required). There
> > appear to be DOS utils on the drive, and command.com, but I've not
> checked
> > for hidden system files yet. fdisk shows the partition as active.
>
> Date and time of Command.com and any other DOS files will identify the
> version number.
>
> DIR /A  or
> DIR /A:H
> will let you see the hidden files (presumably IO.SYS and MSDOS.SYS; PC-DOS
> had IBMBIO.COM and IBMDOS.COM instead)
>
> Can you COPY files from the HDD to floppy?
>
> Being able to access contents of files, but not RUN them seems odd.
> IF the DOS on the floppy misunderstands the partition table, then root
> directory might look OK, but sub-directories might not be where it thinks
> they are, . . .
>
>
> >> Got an IBM "Advanced Diagnostics" floppy to try?
> > No, but I see that the minuszerodegrees site has an image, so I'll write
> that
> > out and see what happens.
>
> NOT a big deal.  It's merely the only method directly from IBM for doing
> low level format.
> In most cases, Speedstor is more useful for LLF.
>
> > Looking at the drive contents, incidentally, I didn't see anything that
> > explains (or interacts with) that unusual video hardware - it basically
> just
> > holds DOS and a bunch of documents written by the original owner. Maybe
> they
> > got suckered into buying this fancy graphics hardware without having any
> > actual need for it, and then of course EGA and VGA came along and
> rendered it
> > obsolete anyway.
>
> It is probably completely CGA compatible, unless you invoke of of its
> other modes.
>
> The ROM on the video card may be a BIOS extension, in which case access to
> extended modes may be handled internally in various programs.  For
> instance Windows 3.x, PC PAint, Pagemaker, and Xerox Ventura let you
> configure for a variety of video hardware.
> Otherwise, check to see if CONFIG.SYS has DEVICE commands to load any
> device drivers, usually .SYS, although sometimes .COM
>
> >> XT controllers tended to NOT be interchangeable, even between various
> OEMs
> >> of Xebec!
> > Yes - something that people often seem to forget, too. I've run into
> that
> > quite often, where someone will hang onto an old drive because of the
> > contents, but they'll dump the controller that it was formatted against.
>
> It always seemed counter-intuitive that makers of HDD hardware for XT
> didn't slavishly mimic IBM's XT HDD.  And especially counter-intuitive
> that different vendor Xebec controllers didn't always interchange.
>
>
> --
> Grumpy Ol' Fred ci...@xenosoft.com
>


Re: Factory Rodent Urine, was Re: Sun SPARCstation LX boot from CDROM?

2020-08-31 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Not fun at all - :-(

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:25 PM Tom Hunter via cctalk 
wrote:

> Not funny if your prized treasures fall victim to it.
>
> :-(
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:11 AM Chuck Guzis via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> > On 8/31/20 6:21 PM, Steven M Jones via cctalk wrote:
> > > On 8/30/20 6:32 AM, Tom Hunter via cctalk wrote:
> > >> I now wonder if 25+ years ago during production of the CDROM at the
> Sony
> > >> factory some rodent relieved itself over one or more PCBs and next
> > >> morning
> > >> the PCB got assembled into a CDROM drive.
> > >
> > > I've heard of "factory rust" and "factory oil leaks," but never before
> > > have I run across the concept of "factory rodent urine..."
> >
> > Wait'll you get one where several generations of mice have raised their
> > young.   It ain't just pee...
> >
> > --Chuck
> >
>


Re: Spam

2020-08-31 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Not me either,

But I pass all of my email through gmail, and it filters out all of the
spam for me anyway.

A couple of years ago, some helpful person selected my email for sending
millions of messages and it broke my email environment, the only way I
could get it working again was to either abandon my email, or use gmail for
everything.

instant, clean email feed.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 9:33 AM mazzinia--- via cctalk 
wrote:

> Not me
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk  On Behalf Of Peter Coghlan
> via
> cctalk
> Sent: 01 September 2020 00:55
> To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
> Subject: Spam
>
> Anybody else on cctech/cctalk receive a blatant spam today from an outfit
> called "SparkPost" with "OptIn Live" in the subject?
>
> Regards,
> Peter Coghlan.
>
>


Re: michael Holley?

2020-08-29 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I can't get to the original domain.

It certainly looks unregistered.

On Sun, 30 Aug. 2020, 6:41 am jwest--- via cctalk, 
wrote:

> Mike wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk  On Behalf Of Mike Douglas
> via cctalk
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 6:02 PM
> To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: michael Holley?
>
> I archived the entire website in the summer of 2019, shortly before it
> went offline in the Fall of 2019. When it became clear that SWTPC.COM was
> not coming back on line, I chose to host the content at
> https://deramp.com/swtpc.com/ so hobbyists could still have access to the
> excellent material Michael pulled together. Mike Evenson also hosts a copy
> of the website at http://www.swtpcemu.com/mholley/.
>
> Anything you can do to preserve and host the material at swtpc.* is much
> appreciated!
>
> Mike=
> ---
> I had written:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of jwest---
> via cctalk
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 1:03 PM
> To: 'Peter Corlett'; 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
> Subject: RE: swtpc.com expired???
>
> That's one of my IP's. I'm quite doubtful that the content is gone, only
> that the domain registrant perhaps let it expire?
>
> It's safe, please don't rape my bandwidth 😝
>
> J
> --
>
> I did say the content was safe so it sure was not clear that it wasn't
> coming back, and if there was concern it wasn't coming back I could have
> been contacted as my site was the official owners site. Of course I'm glad
> it's been "archived and preserved" by others, but not great to see copies
> unauthorized by the owner and put up by the grace of my bandwidth.
>
> J
>
>
>


Re: Comp.lang.forth: banned on google groups?

2020-07-29 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
That is absolutely in keeping with the flame nature of the group.

Sigh...

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:33 AM Tony Aiuto via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> People are working on restoring comp.lang.forth and comp.lang.lisp
>
> From what I can gather, this was because of numerous defamation complaints.
>
> https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&term=%22comp.lang.lisp%22
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 6:55 PM Dave Wade via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Al,
> > I would say "mostly". There are still corners that have not totally
> > succumbed.
> >
> > comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
> >
> > has the odd interesting posts, as does the open VMS group
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: cctalk  On Behalf Of Al Kossow
> via
> > > cctalk
> > > Sent: 29 July 2020 21:21
> > > To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
> > > Subject: Re: Comp.lang.forth: banned on google groups?
> > >
> > >
> > > > I wonder if it's time to set up some NNTP mirrors
> > > Usenet is a rotting corpse now.
> > > The right time to do this was decades ago now.
> >
> >
> >
>


Re: Comp.lang.forth: banned on google groups?

2020-07-29 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Comp.lang.forth taught me that flame wars were fun and all I needed to
enjoy them was popcorn.

It also showed me how every person writing their own version of a language
and the associated flame wars actually damaged the the community.  I
suspect much of Forths lack of traction can be attributed to that.

Are you sure it's really useful historical material?

On Thu, 30 Jul. 2020, 6:48 am Joseph S. Barrera III via cctalk, <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> P.S. I just downloaded (from the internet archive) and looked at the
> comp.lang.forth archives and they seem to cover 2003 through 2014.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 1:42 PM Joseph S. Barrera III 
> wrote:
>
> > Right now it's (temporarily?) hidden, not deleted. Hopefully it will be
> > restored. (I used to be a member of the Google Groups project.) Banned
> > groups aren't deleted for some number of weeks in case the ban was a
> > mistake.
> >
> > There are also some backups at
> > https://archive.org/download/usenet-comp.lang
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 1:11 PM Dave via cctalk 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I was looking for an old post on comp.lang.forth, and was surprised to
> >> discover that the group doesn't appear to be hosted on google groups any
> >> more.  Searching the group pulls up a "banned group" message, and
> selecting
> >> the "continue to the group" button shows 0 messages in the group.  This
> >> appears to be due to spam showing up in the unmoderated group.
> >>
> >> Google bought Dejanews years ago, and, as I understand, was the defacto
> >> main usenet repository.  Is is all really gone, or just temporarily
> >> hidden?  How long ago did this happen?  Is the full comp.lang.forth
> archive
> >> available anywhere?
> >>
> >> I wonder if it's time to set up some NNTP mirrors and gather as much
> >> historical usenet content as possible.  Much of the overall content is
> >> garbage, but there's some priceless stuff in there, and even more that
> will
> >> become interesting in light of future developments.
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >
>


Re: Adventures online

2020-07-23 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Ahhh,

Just m,aybe it is simply an I/O processor with different firmware - That
would run zork just fine :-P

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:22 AM Toby Thain via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On 2020-07-23 8:59 p.m., dwight via cctalk wrote:
> > I would think to be a mainframe, it has to have a I/O processor. That is
> about all I can think of.
> > Dwight
> >
>
>
> So, a BeagleBone then
>
>
> > 
> > From: cctalk  on behalf of Grant Taylor
> via cctalk 
> > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 4:06 PM
> > To: cctalk@classiccmp.org 
> > Subject: Re: Adventures online
> >
> > On 7/23/20 4:34 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
> >> How about the XT/370?  or XT/360?
> >> (I couldn't afford one)
> >
> > As the predecessor to the P/390-E, I definitely think that the XT/370 or
> > XT/360 is a (baby) mainframe.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Grant. . . .
> > unix || die
> >
>
>


Re: Adventures online

2020-07-22 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Sadly, the original tweet doesn't mention what mainframe - Somebody did
ask, and there was no response I could see.

The error messages suggest it's some sort of Linux system using Docker
containers, so it's not OS/360 :-)

I suspect given that it's running out of memory, that it's yet another
linux box.



Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.

^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G- In more laid back days this line would literally
sing ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G ^G




On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 7:50 AM Kevin Lee via cctalk 
wrote:

> Ask the tweet included in the initial posting..
> I have nothing to do with it .. cheers
>
>
> > On 22 Jul 2020, at 23:15, Kevin Monceaux via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 09:52:14PM +0200, 821--- via cctalk wrote:
> >
> >> Almost all InfoCom adventure games now online running on a mainframe!
> >> Telnet to 35.209.67.107 (guest/guest1) and play text mode adventure
> games
> >> on a mainframe
> >>
> >> https://twitter.com/bmoshix/status/1285905078373814273/photo/1
> >
> > What make/model mainframe are they running on, and what OS is it running?
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Kevin
> > http://www.RawFedDogs.net
> > http://www.Lassie.xyz
> > http://www.WacoAgilityGroup.org
> > Bruceville, TX
> >
> > What's the definition of a legacy system? One that works!
> > Errare humanum est, ignoscere caninum.
>
>


Re: Ancient transistor ?computer board (Peter Van Peborgh)

2020-06-18 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Hi Peter,

That is a stunning board, and in beautiful condition.

The square cubes are transformers, most likely some sort of pulse
transformer on the base of the transistor.

A multimeter will tell you in quick form.

Doug

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard - for this I apologise in
advance - It's ok bec we don* nee* accu tex* to unde** actu**
mean***.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, Setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.





On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 6:14 AM Peter Van Peborgh via cctech <
cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> OK, now here are some pics that should be available to everybody. I hope.
>
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/h64tye8ecmPHQfJD7
>
> Smells of (early) 1960s transistorized.
> No helpful marking apart from
> *   "GATE JJ01" on SIDE A. (components).
> *   "C NT OL DATA" on side B (solder traces).
>
> Big transistors are Motorola "180376008". Also, any ideas what the "246 636
> B" boxes are, they have four legs?
>
> A curse on TinyURL and praise to Camiel Vanderhoven.
>
> peter
>
>


Re: Future of cctalk/cctech

2020-06-17 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I gave up on hosting my own email years ago when I was the recipient of
tens of thousands of spam messages per day, both to this and my business
email address.  I now simply use gmail to handle email - seems like the G
beast has seen every bit of spam before, so the spam transfer rate is
approximating zero.

All of the old mailing lists I use are on groups.io -   I actually don't
log into their platform, instead they send me updates as messages.  These
often contain attachments, which don't bother me, as its using google mail
storage to store, and unless its interesting, I don't bother copying it
into my world.  That way, complete disk images can be sent and I don't mind.

Using a glass screen VDU with a mouse, means that the sparse, and expensive
to obtain paper for the TTY is not adversely used when somebody top or
bottom or sideways posts.   And I can even catch up on email while I am
using my phone in the bus.

If we do implement attachments that are limited to one SSDD 8" disk, can
there please be some technological way of chaining disk 'parts' to allow
larger attachments to be transmitted?

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard - for this I apologise in
advance - It's ok bec we don* nee* accu tex* to unde** actu**
mean***.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, Setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.





On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:49 AM ED SHARPE via cctalk 
wrote:

>
> We use groups,io for the tom swift discussion group real handy to post
> photos, files and etc..
> On Wednesday, June 17, 2020 Chris Hanson via cctalk <
> cmhan...@eschatologist.net; cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2020, at 1:50 AM, Tor Arntsen via cctalk 
> wrote:
> >
>  There is also groups.io, and it has some very nice features compared
> to
> >
> > Please please, no groups of any kinds. They're all horrible to use.
>
> Do you mean "web forum" where you say "groups?"
>
> > A
> > genuine mailing list like this is infinitively easier to keep track of
> > and read at leisure. Can't stand groups.io.
>
> I've found the groups.io  mailing list mode to be
> perfectly reasonable for a number of groups I'm a part of. And it has a
> forum-like front end for people who insist on doing everything through a
> web page.
>
>   -- Chris
>


Re: Ancient transistor ?computer board

2020-06-16 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Ah... I suspect it's an example of modern web apps being excessive.

That URL was likely only active during the session that the user was active
within.  When the session went away so did the URL.

It's longer than the information content of the universe to stop it from
being accessed by somebody else intentionally during a session by brute
force.

I love the modern internet.  It's apollo obfuscated.

On Wed, 17 Jun. 2020, 6:15 am Chuck Guzis via cctalk, 
wrote:

> On 6/16/20 12:29 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
> >
> > Q: Is that link adequate to unambiguously identify any specific location
> > within any sub-atomic particle in the universe?  (such as far more
> > detail than is required for the PHYSICAL LOCATION of the start of the
> > file??)
>
> Well, let's do some spitballing here.
>
> There are estimated to be around 10^80 atoms in the known, observable
> universe, which is about 34 8-bit bytes worth.   So we could have a
> unique number for each atom in the universe in only 34 bytes.
>
> In that light, the URL *does* seem to be a bit excessive.
>
> --Chuck
>
>


Re: Future of cctalk/cctech

2020-06-16 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
We could consider moving to Google groups hosting.

In the wake of the removal of Yahoo many of my groups moved there and it
works really well.

Doug

On Wed, 17 Jun. 2020, 7:22 am Rob Jarratt via cctalk, 
wrote:

> > -Original Message-
> > From: cctalk  On Behalf Of Bill Degnan
> via
> > cctalk
> > Sent: 16 June 2020 21:16
> > To: Al Kossow ; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-
> > Topic Posts 
> > Subject: Re: Future of cctalk/cctech
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:46 PM Al Kossow via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > With Jay retiring, what are the hosting plans for these mailing lists?
> > >
> > >
> > Sorry, I missed the news...vcfed.org has a mailing list, maybe someone
> there
> > can suggest whether the services they receive are any good.  Eric Klein
> or Cory
> > Cohen or Mike Brutman are involved with the list, I think.
> > Maybe Jeff Brace.  I am not involved there anymore so I lost touch.
> > Bill
>
> I missed this too, and I don't seem to be able to find anything in the
> archive. Where was this posted?
>
> Regards
>
> Rob
>
>
>


Re: Malfunctioning VT240 - help please

2020-06-15 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I remember testing memory chips with a thumb.  The one that took yoir
fingerprint ofd was always faulty.

Hopefully it's not whisker regrowth.  That would be really frustrating.

On Fri, 12 Jun. 2020, 12:15 am Charles via cctalk, 
wrote:

>
> On 6/11/20 2:29 AM, Mattis Lind wrote:
> >
> >
> > torsdag 11 juni 2020 skrev Charles via cctalk  > >:
> >
> >
> > On 6/10/20 4:31 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> >
> > On 06/10/2020 12:48 PM, Charles via cctalk wrote:
> >
> >
> > That leaves the unlikely possibility that one of the octal
> > TTL devices, or ROMs. has developed a weird internal
> > pathway that only interferes with DAL3 & 1 on some bit
> > patterns, but not all the time. Seems like a zebra rather
> > than a horse. The only part that drives multiple low-order
> > DAL lines at once besides the E19-22 ROMs is the E55 LS245.
> >
> > Quite possible that this could happen when a specific device
> > is driving the bus -- or that NOBODY is driving the bus in
> > that state. When it is stuck at the ~1V level, try a resistor
> > of about 1 K to ground on one of those lines.  If it moves
> > several hundred mV lower, it is a TTL open circuit.  If it
> > doesn't change at all, it is a bus contention (TWO drivers
> > driving at once).
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >
> > After much Googling, I discovered/remembered that the RQDX3 M7555
> > floppy controller card in my PDP-11/23+ system has a T11 CPU on
> board!
> >
> > So I pulled the card and popped the T11 into the VT240. Guess what
> > - the terminal still doesn't work!! Craptastic. At least it's not
> > the most expensive and rarest part on the board... but now I'm
> > really stumped. This isn't my first rodeo - in fact back in the
> > 80's I used to design microprocessor systems for a living, and
> > have continued to keep my hand in repairing my video arcade games
> > and a PDP-8 system, among other projects.
> >
> > Meanwhile... the T11 DAL lines are only connected to a few parts
> > that can drive onto that local bus. Time to have a look at the
> > glue logic for the DRAM selects. Although the ROM chip selects
> > seem to work, maybe the DRAM or something else actually IS
> > conflicting despite the mixed signals (pun intended) ;)
> >
> > Time to break out the logic analyzer, and start burning pairs of
> > 27256 EPROMs with test programs. Maybe initially just fill them
> > with NOP's (000240 octal) with a jump to zero at the end!
> >
> >
> >
> > Now that you know the T11 is good I think it a good idea to attach a
> > logic analyzer on the bus.
> >
> > I would then disassemble the ROM code and match that with the logic
> > analyzer execution trace. Then it should be possible to find out what
> > is going on. If one can rely on the fault code on the keyboard it is
> > able to pass tests 0 to 4 successfully. Of course I have no idea what
> > these test really do but assuming they do some more than advanced
> > things I doubt that they would work if there are severe bus contention.
> >
> > If that would be the case I think the system would fail quite soon
> > rather than on test 5. A guess is that this is a memory problem.
> >
> > Good luck!
> >
> > /Mattis
>
> =
>
> Thanks for the tip. I didn't see in the manuals that the keyboard light
> pattern was actually a binary code, but that makes sense! I would have
> expected an error message on the screen, but as I previously noted, the
> video system itself does not seem to be working properly.
>
> Unfortunately my logic analyzer is an ancient Tek 7D01, the equivalent
> of stone tools rather than metal ;) It's not really suited for doing
> this kind of work, but it's what I have... I wonder if anyone has
> already disassembled the code?
>
> The 4116's are soldered to the board, too. Since the memory map is shown
> in the tech manual I could write a simple memory test and burn an EPROM.
>
> My fear is that one of the PALs has altered itself from tin-whisker
> migration (fuse regrowth) :(
>
>


Re: Looking for a document regarding PDP8

2020-04-21 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Is it possible to share the link.

On Wed, 22 Apr. 2020, 3:38 pm Bob Smith via cctalk, 
wrote:

> I found the referenced paper, wrong authors - it was Bell and
> Casasent, in a cache paper, a bit earlier than 78
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:17 PM Bob Smith  wrote:
> >
> > Nice!
> > BUT  no my BigMac is a Mac Pro 1,1 tweaked with TB of disk with my old
> > files on it.
> > I call it BigMac cause it is about the same weight as the full chassis
> > PDP8/e I had at DEC that I lugged from one spot to another.
> > I did power it up and ran a number of searches, two more machines and
> > 8 more drives to search.
> > Thanks Al! Good Laugh!
> > bb
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 3:30 PM Al Kossow via cctalk
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > On 4/16/20 10:12 AM, Bob Smith via cctalk wrote:
> > > > I am bout to pull out my BigMac that might
> > > > have the data in it.
> > >
> > > As in the Apple 68020 Rich Page computer?
> > > If so, I'd REALLY like to get a copy of the disk image
> > > to use on the BigMac that the museum has.
> > >
> > > https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102747603
> > >
> > >
>


Pdp11/05 boot media

2020-04-21 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Hi everybody

I'm the proud owner of a PDP11/05 system with a couple of 8" floppy
drives.  I believe they are likely to be RX01s.

Does anybody on the list have some boot media that they could provide.  I
understand that the controller can't format the disks so I'm in a
frustrating state where I don't know where to start.

Doug Jackson

Canberra  Australia.


Re: HP 41-CX

2020-04-21 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Hi David,

That certainly is a shame.  For the gold plated contact to corrode so badly
means large amounts of potential damage to the flexible PCB.

You may be able to repair it using some brass shim - but I cant see how
else to repair it.

The CX was a wonderful machine - and seeing this has reminded me of many a
night at uni.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard - for this I apologise in
advance - It's ok bec we don* nee* accu tex* to unde** actu**
mean***.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, Setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.





On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:56 AM David Brownlee via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> I've come into possession of an HP 41-CX calculator - unfortunately it
> appears to have had batteries left in it which have left corrosion on
> the internal contacts.
>
> (some pics: https://photos.app.goo.gl/48bE7WJZP8R4PF9a9 )
>
> My classic hardware tendencies tend to run more towards the "can run
> *nix" end, and while I could just clean it up and throw it on eBay I
> wondered if anyone here has a 41C shaped soft spot and would be
> interested? (happy to trade/part trade for something they already have
> for which they are less fond if that works :)
>
> David
>


Re: OT: Weller soldering irons

2020-04-05 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
for me, the item that usually fails in the WTCP series is the switch at the
end of the sensor.

I have replaced the sensors each time, because dammit - My 40 year old iron
sometimes just needs a new cord, or a new heater, or a new tip, or a new
sensor.  Best iron I have ever had :-)


Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: d...@doughq.com
ph: 0414 986878

Check out my awesome clocks at www.dougswordclocks.com
Follow my amateur radio adventures at vk1zdj.net

---

Just like an old fashioned letter, this email and any files transmitted
with it should probably be treated as confidential and intended solely for
your own use.

Please note that any interesting spelling is usually my own and may have
been caused by fat thumbs on a tiny tiny keyboard - for this I apologise in
advance - It's ok bec we don* nee* accu tex* to unde** actu**
mean***.

Should any part of this message prove to be useful in the event of the
imminent Zombie Apocalypse then the sender bears no personal, legal, or
moral responsibility for any outcome resulting from its usage unless the
result of said usage is the unlikely defeat of the Zombie Hordes in which
case the sender takes full credit without any theoretical or actual legal
liability. :-)

Be nice to your parents.

Go outside and do something awesome - Draw, paint, walk, Setup a
radio station, go fishing or sailing - just do something that makes you
happy.





On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 11:14 AM Pete Turnbull via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On 06/04/2020 00:22, Jon Elson wrote:
> > On 04/05/2020 03:32 PM, Pete Turnbull via cctalk wrote:
> >> A few hours ago I started looking at three "smart" light switches that
> >> need LEDs replaced, and switched on the soldering iron, and ... nope.
> >> It's a Weller WP80 and it seems the sensor in the heating element has
> >> died.
>
> > Is the sensor a separate component?
>
> Sadly, no.  That's the first thing I thought of.  The heater and sensor
> are integral with the stainless steel shaft and I can't see any way to
> get them out without destroying the shaft.
>
> --
> Pete
> Pete Turnbull
>


Re: pdp11/05 key?

2020-04-05 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I'm literally in the process of starting this.

I have a pdp11/05 and the key was snapped off.  I brazed it back together.

The barrel is a three wafer unit.  It is easily removable by undoing the 4
screws to remove the front panel.  Removing the screws holding the micro
switches in place and removing the lock retaining plate.

I was going to take the key and barrel to a local locksmith for him to make
some spares.

Doug

On Sun, 5 Apr. 2020, 6:18 pm Tom Uban via cctalk, 
wrote:

> Does anyone have information on having a replacement PDP-11/05 key made?
>
> --tnx
> --tom
>


Re: HPE OpenVMS Hobbyist license program is closing

2020-03-24 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
'telnet ? that is very much indeed useful if someone wants to run a pure
old school desktop while managing !'

He he...

Of course it should be said that that old gear using Telnet shouldn't be
connected to the wider internet.

It's kind of funny when a kid in Sydney discovers he can turn off a city
block in Melbourne

Its frightening what I've learnt as a security guy working in control and
data acquisition gear (SCADA) for various utility companies

In a very Not Funny way...

Doug

On Tue, 24 Mar. 2020, 8:08 pm Stefan Skoglund via cctalk, <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> lör 2020-03-21 klockan 14:44 + skrev Maciej W. Rozycki via cctalk:
> > On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> >
> > > >  Not a question for me, but for the record I have used a WTI
> > > > remote site
> > > > manager, essentially a combined power distribution and terminal
> > > > server
> > > > unit, for 5 years now.
> > >
> > > That's this product line, itn's it?
> > >
> > >
> https://www.wti.com/c-93-cpm-800-2-series-console-server-power-control-combos.aspx
> >
> >  It is, however 5 years ago the choice was different and much smaller
> > (in
> > this category).  They have since switched from Freescale Power to ARM
> > as
> > the hardware platform, and presumably still use Linux with a custom
> > app to
> > drive it.
> >
> >  Control CLI access is over SSHv2 over IPv4/IPv6; likewise serial
> > port
> > access (both ways).  Per-port and per-plug user accounts can be
> > created.
> > There's also control HTTPS and I believe telnet access available, but
> > who
> > needs that?  Of course both can be disabled.
>
> telnet ? that is very much indeed useful if someone wants to run a pure
> old school desktop while managing !
>
>


Re: SWTPC SuperClock II board

2020-03-21 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
That's a beautiful board.

While I have no docs, a careful look confirms for me that it would
superimpose something (likely clock data) on a video signal.  The
horizontal and vertical counters, mux and Rom give that away.

I love the layout.   Absoloutly done in the days of tape ar 2 or 4 times.
  Beautiful.

On Sat, 21 Mar. 2020, 8:26 am William Sudbrink via cctalk, <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> I would bet that that board increases the resolution of one of the early
> SWTPc terminals.  I'm not sure which one.
>
> Bill S.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Kyle
> Owen via cctalk
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 3:52 PM
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: SWTPC SuperClock II board
>
> In the midst of cleaning up, I came across this board. Can't seem to find
> any info online about it. There's another board from another company, not
> SWTPC, with the same name—apparently a timekeeping board for an Apple II.
>
> https://imgur.com/a/j8pyqMZ
>
> I assume this is a way to generate a composite video signal with the
> current time displayed? Anyone have schematics or a parts list?
>
> Thanks, and stay healthy!
>
> Kyle
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>


Re: HPE OpenVMS Hobbyist license program is closing

2020-03-10 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Having worked for them in also not surprised.

When they absorbed Compaq their culture changed.  Significantly for the
worse.

I'd be stunned if they existed in a form other that selling printers and
ink cartridges in 5 years time.

On Wed, 11 Mar. 2020, 10:42 am Patrick Finnegan via cctalk, <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020, 18:36 Fred Cisin via cctalk 
> wrote:
>
> >
> > > On 3/9/20 10:19 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
> > >> but don't value the hobbyist market enough to try to help.
> > >
> > > Which costs them money with very likely  no ROI.
> >
> > Some such companies spend money on advertising.  A well run hobbyist
> > program is good advertising.  It promotes brand loyalty and good PR.
> >
>
> Based on my day to day interactions with HPE as a company, this action
> doesn't surprise me at all.  They don't seem to want to do anything that
> isn't directly "extracting value."
>
> Pat
>
> >
>


Re: HPE OpenVMS Hobbyist license program is closing

2020-03-09 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
So.

At the end of the day there are three paths.

1.  Accept that HP doesn't give two hoots about hobbyists and patch the
abandoned operating system to fix the problem.

2. Declare that we need to develop an open replacement.

Or

3.  Accept that HP actually owns the rights to our VAX 11/785 machines and
arrange for them to be dropped off at their corporate headquarters because
they can't do anything without software.

Sigh...


On Tue, 10 Mar. 2020, 8:23 am Chris Hanson via cctalk, <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On Mar 9, 2020, at 1:01 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/9/20 1:33 PM, John H. Reinhardt via cctalk wrote:
> >> On 3/9/2020 12:20 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM John H. Reinhardt via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I would think that those that already have legal VAX PAKs/licenses
> could still run them. It's just no *NEW* PAKs could be legally generated.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The hobby PAKs _and_ the licenses have a one-year expiration.
> >> As a Hobbyist license holder since 2004 I am well aware.  The language
> Bill used implied that no one would be able to legally run OpenVMS on a
> VAX.  I was saying that those who had bought licenses previously (implying
> commercial and other entities) should still be legal in running VAX OpenVMS
> even after HPE shuts down their OpenVMS activities.  Bill may have been
> intending just the Hobbyist (and educational licenses, too) but the
> language was ambiguous.
> >
> > Actually, as long as they can live with incorrect time Hobbyists
> > could use that last set of PAKs forever.
>
> That’s from a technical perspective, from a legal perspective their
> license expired.
>
>   -- Chris
>
>


Re: swtpc.com expired???

2019-11-06 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
It looks like it's the hosting bill as well.  That's not a simple expired
domain page.

On Thu, 7 Nov. 2019, 9:20 am Bill Degnan via cctalk, 
wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019, 5:15 PM William Sudbrink via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> > Domain has been down for 7 days now.  No reply to emails.  Does anyone
> know
> > anything?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: William Sudbrink [mailto:wh.sudbr...@verizon.net]
> > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 12:29 PM
> > To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
> > Subject: swtpc.com expired???
> >
> > Anybody know if Mike Holley is OK?
> >
> > Bill S.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
>
> Anyone can pay a domain reg bill I think, 20 bucks or so, if someone wants
> to.
> B
>
> >
> >
>


Re: Nuke Redmond!

2019-10-07 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
It is.

He ended up serving 15 months in prison for making rescue disks that were
based on downloadable software that required licence keys that the PCs that
he refurbished already had.

It's a complex.case and the judge didn't understand the actual value of the
media which was zero.

Sadly technically he did breach copyright.

So lesson to learn.

Stay away from software giants who have bigger bankrolls than you do.



On Mon, 7 Oct. 2019, 8:33 pm Dave Wade via cctalk, 
wrote:

> Note:- This storey is a year old...
>
> Dave
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cctalk  On Behalf Of Jeffrey S.
> Worley
> > via cctalk
> > Sent: 07 October 2019 04:24
> > To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
> > Subject: Nuke Redmond!
> >
> > A fellow who was putting the air in "Microsoft Tire" (c) is going to
> prison.
> > Microsoft claims that the air they give free with the tire is not free.
> You can
> > download the air and install the air and use the air, but noone can help
> you do
> > it or they will spend 15months in federal prison and pay 3/4 of a
> million beans
> > in damages for helping you and charging nothing for it but a quarter for
> the
> > electricity it cost to put the air in.
> >
> >
> https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-microsoft-copyright-
> > 20180426-
> > story.html?fbclid=IwAR3v6MDIUWtqyUxcupT7YQOaX5a7bzrKZKAZWKQFYkdzbg
> > 9xvWhvRVkSuq4
> >
> > Jeff
>
>
>


Re: FixMeStick

2018-11-27 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I am working on a USB interface for my Sinclair ZX 80.

The biggest problem im facing is how to buffer the 16GB through my 1kb of
program RAM.   It's proving to be very slow.

Just as soon as I can get that working I'm hoping to be able to read these
devices.


On Tue, 27 Nov. 2018, 4:57 pm ED MAJDEN via cctalk 
> Hello group:
> Has anyone used a FixMeStick to fix computer issues like virus
> problems and key tracking hacking?  Does it really fix such problems or
> create new ones?
> Thanx for any comments that are posted.
> Ed
>
>
>


Re: What is vintage

2018-02-25 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
I know it has been discussed a billion times before...

My personal measure has nothing to do with the 20 year rule - I use the
introduction of the PC as the end of the Vintage era.  IBM made the
computing industry standard and boring.

Anything pre - 1982 is interesting, anything post 1982 is a boat anchor...
(Duck)

Doug


Doug Jackson
VK1ZDJ


On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:59 PM, allison via cctalk 
wrote:

> On 02/25/2018 09:06 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
> >> What is vintage computing?
> >> I think it's the IBM PC.  Anything else is not vintage computing.
> >
> > Frankly, I'm shocked.
> >
> > I could have understood, if you were to have chosen Atari, Superbrain,
> > Commodore 64, or Coleco Adam.  Anything other than those, . . .
> Fred,
>
>  Just wow!
>
> Set reaction$mode=sarcasm/troll
>
> Does he mean my 1973 PDP-8f, or maybe the Altair, TRS80, or my LSI-11/03
> is not?
>  Heck I don't even keep PCs as collectible, oops I do have a random
> Ratshack HX1000.
>
> Seriously?
>
>
> Allison
>
>
>


Re: Password reset for ~1998 AIX on RS/6000?

2018-02-03 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Hi...

>From memory there were a number of remote exploits against AIX 4.x.x

The most simple were against ftpd.

A quick search found this..

https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/14409/.   This extracts the root user
hash.


Of course if you have local access there is the rlogin vulnerability
against some versions that allowed a normal user to have root privileges
with a trivial command line such as rlogin -l.  But my memory is foggy
there.

Should be a fun task.  One of the nice things about old operating systems
is that there security is pretty well non existent as.things that were zero
days in the 90s are well known now.

Doug




On 3 Feb. 2018 7:49 am, "Ian Finder via cctalk" 
wrote:

> I had this experience with a Tadpole N40, running AIX 3.
>
> I simply DD'ed the drive, took the image...
> $ strings aix-machine.img | grep root:
> ...to get the password line.
>
> Dump that into a passwd file and run john (the password cracker utility) on
> it for a couple days.
>
> I don't think Linux can mount the early AIX filesystems directly.
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:24 PM, r.stricklin via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Feb 1, 2018, at 7:28 PM, Tapley, Mark via cctech wrote:
> >
> > >> Image the hard drive off to a raw file using a linux host with a SCSI
> > HBA?
> > >>
> > >> Once that is done, it might be possible to run a hex editor against
> the
> > hard drive (one that doesn't copy the contents into RAM) and then search
> > for the password file. From there you can copy the des hash and use
> rainbow
> > tables / wordfiles to crack it or replace it with a known DES hash?
> >
> > You don't need to do any of these things.
> >
> > > Update, I did locate a CD saying “AIX V4.2.1 for 5765-C34” and this
> URL:
> >
> > All you need is this disk. You can boot it, and use it to start a
> > maintenance shell, from which you can mount the root filesystem and edit
> > the password file(s) directly. The procedure you found will get you
> there,
> > easily.
> >
> > ok
> > bear.
> >
> >
> > --
> > until further notice
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>Ian Finder
>(206) 395-MIPS
>ian.fin...@gmail.com
>


Re: Preventing VAX running VMS / Multinet from being used as SMTP relay

2017-12-06 Thread Doug Jackson via cctalk
Camiel,

Without sounding super negative (my day job as a security consultant let's
me do that  enough...)  I would be especially wary of connecting anything
with a 10 year old stack to the modern internet.  The range of automatic
attacks based on what the state of the OS was when it was last patched is
staggering.

Can you NAT it behind something to not expose it directly?   Can you run
proxies in front of it?

Doug

On 2 Dec. 2017 8:34 pm, "Camiel Vanderhoeven via cctech" <
cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On 11/30/17, 9:26 PM, "cctech on behalf of william degnan via cctech"
>  wrote:
>
>
> >I have a microvax set up with VMS 5, running MULTINET (and decnet
> >locally).   The server has a FQDN and after a while being exposed to the
> >WWW someone out there started using the server as an SMTP relay.  I can
> >disable and clear the queue, but I'd like to block entirely this from
> >happening in the first place.  I'd like to learn more about how this
> >happens in VMS.
> >
> >Anyone have had this same problem before?  I realize back when VMS 5 was
> >current it was not so much of an issue, but today it is.  I am working on
> >a
> >solution.  I can envision a few ways including blocking the smtp relay
> >port
> >from the firewall, but if possible I'd like to set up a VMS Multinet
> >solution as a learning exercise.
> >
> >I am open to suggestions, and once I find the solution I'll post it.
> >
> >I understand that this kind of thing is not cookie cutter, there are
> >different levels one could address something like this.  I have a comcast
> >business router, and one of the 5 IPs I have is NAT assigned to the
> >internal 10.1.10 port of the microvax.
> >
> >This is the same machine I wrote about previously as with then, thanks for
> >your help.  I find the best way to learn is on the actual hardware warts
> >and all.
> >
> >Bill
>
> Look at the SMTP_SERVER_REJECT file example here:
> http://www.process.com/docs/multinet5_4/admin_guide/Ch15.htm.
> It¹s a set of rules that decide whether a message gets rejected (rule
> ending in ³y²) or let through (rule ending in ³n²). You¹d normally set
> this up to first let through those emails you want, then reject everything
> else at the end of the rules file.
> >
>
>
>