[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0486-01: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 mod_perl security update
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the centos mirror: RHSA-2007:0486-01 Moderate: mod_perl security update Files available: mod_perl-1.26-8.el2.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin Computer Systems Officer Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-es] vsftpd
revisa las restriciones del firewall y deberias de ser mas especifico, supongo q la estacion con windows 2000 tiene uan ip diferente a las que tien xp verifica las reglas del firewall del centos, seguro tu xp esta en un rango restringido Julio Escobar escribió: Buenas , estoy utilizando Centos-4.4, y habilite mi servidor vsftpd, pero tengo un inconveniente, es que puedo acceder desde Windows 2000 con IE, pero no lo puedo hacer desde XP con IE ni con Firefox, tambien tengo problemas con algunos Ftp clientes como el Cute, quisiera saber a que se debe esto, y como puedo solucionarlo?. Desde ya muhcas gracias, Saludos *Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí.* Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, está en *Yahoo! Respuestas* (Beta). *¡Probalo ya! http://ar.answers.yahoo.com* ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] Correct xen domains path
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 11:50 +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: 1. According to http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Xen/InstallingCentOSDomU?highlight=%28xen%29 it would be /srv/xen or even /var/lib/xen/images. ¿What is the correct absolute path to put into the xen domains files? Whatever you prefer, as long as the images have the correct security context. Otherwise, SELinux will deny access to the images. 2. Moreover, if you want the domU(s) boot together dom0, you should put the domains files (images) into /etc/xen/auto. ¿A simple symlink will be enough in this case? No, you shouldn't put the images there, but the (Xen) domain configuration files of the domains you would like to start during the boot process. -- Daniel ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - IP Tables - forwarding to localhost
Hi, Try this: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d old_mailserver_ip --destination-port 25 -j DNAT --to-destination 127.0.0.1:25 first last wrote: Hi, I am trying to set up a firewall rule so calls to old_mailserver:25 get redirected to localhost:25. I have seen quite a few rules and none seem to work. I have tried with the firewall enabled (configured to allow smtp) and disabled, but it doesn't seem to make a difference. One of the commands I have been using is: /sbin/iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -p tcp -d old_mailserver_ip/32 --dport 25 -j REDIRECT --to 127.0.0.1:25 Am I missing anything? Thanks Gabriel ___ Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for your free account today http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - IP Tables - forwarding to localhost
Igor Demjanenko napsal(a): Hi, Try this: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d old_mailserver_ip --destination-port 25 -j DNAT --to-destination 127.0.0.1:25 Try: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d old_mailserver_ip --destination-port 25 -j DNAT --to-destination 127.0.0.1 Please do note :25 missing. David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] mounting an lvm partition via a USB adapter
I am trying to mount this (my old hard drive) from my Centos 5 install as a USB drive so I can copy files over. I have made the change to max_luns so that I can have more than one drive on a USB drive. The first partition, /dev/sda1 mounts automatically as /boot_ The second partition, /dev/sda2 is the one I really want and it is an lvm partition. When I am booted from this drive (as the installed IDE drive, not as a usb drive) has for its /etc/fstab: # This file is edited by fstab-sync - see 'man fstab-sync' for details /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 / ext3defaults1 1 LABEL=/boot /boot ext3defaults1 2 none/dev/ptsdevpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0 none/dev/shmtmpfs defaults0 0 /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol02 /home ext3defaults1 2 none/proc procdefaults0 0 none/syssysfs defaults0 0 /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 swapswapdefaults0 0 But I do not see any /dev/Vol... when I boot from my Centos 5 drive (oh, I have labeled the lvm partitions on that drive to start with Centos5 so that its labels are different from my Centos 4 drive lablels). What mount command do I use? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] how to change distro live?
hi, we've got many mandrake 8,9 and 10 system remotely. we'd like to remotely replace these systems to centos 5. we've 4 disk in them. one is the system drive (no need for raid) and there is free space on the remaining 3 disk. so what we think about: - download the new system to the data disks - install grub (mandrake has lilo) to boot the old system and reboot - create the old system in the data disk - update grub to boot the old system from the data disk and reboot - repartition the system disk - transfer the new system to the system disk - update grub to boot form new system disk and reboot. this seems to easy but has many very dangerous steps and we has only remote ssh access to the system. if we loose the connections we can't access the system anymore and we've to travel a lot! another constrain that we should have to do this very fast ie. it'd be nice if the system wouldn't be down for a long time. - what would be the best method for this? - what are the dangerous step here? - what would be the best way and format to transfer the new system to the disk (we think about an iso file)? - does anybody do such thing and what is his experience? thank you for your help in advance. -- Levente Si vis pacem para bellum! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mounting an lvm partition via a USB adapter
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:10:28AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am trying to mount this (my old hard drive) from my Centos 5 install as a USB drive so I can copy files over. The second partition, /dev/sda2 is the one I really want and it is an lvm partition. When I am booted from this drive (as the installed IDE drive, not as a usb drive) has for its /etc/fstab: # This file is edited by fstab-sync - see 'man fstab-sync' for details /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 / ext3defaults1 1 LABEL=/boot /boot ext3defaults1 2 none/dev/ptsdevpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0 none/dev/shmtmpfs defaults0 0 /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol02 /home ext3defaults1 2 none/proc procdefaults0 0 none/syssysfs defaults0 0 /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 swapswapdefaults0 0 But I do not see any /dev/Vol... when I boot from my Centos 5 drive (oh, I have labeled the lvm partitions on that drive to start with Centos5 so that its labels are different from my Centos 4 drive lablels). vgscan ; vgchange -ay VolGroup00 If the volume group happens to be the same as the one you're using on your new system, then that will probably fail, and I suggest renaming your current volume group using a rescue cd (don't forget to recreate the initrd, as it has the vg hardcoded). -- lfr 0/0 pgpz8L8jTzZgV.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOSplus Postfix with mysql/pgsql
The lasted version of Postfix in the OS for 4.5 add a .1 to the rpm version which makes it newer than the CentOSPlus version and hence replaces it, any intent to update the 4.5 CentOSPlus package or should I roll my own with mysql included? 4.5 OS Version: postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.i386.rpm 4.4/5 CentOSPlus Version: postfix-2.2.10-1.RHEL4.2.mysql_pgsql.c4.i386.rpm Thanks Brent -- Brent DiNicola/Whitewolf The Whitewolf of Imrryr centos .AT. elric.net http://www.elric.net Disclaimer: Any opinions expressed here are from my dog. Any liabilities fall to the dog. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ClamAV (was: antivirus)
--On Saturday, June 16, 2007 4:57 PM -0600 Leonel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Centos 5 with clamav ??? Where is that ? Did you mean using dag's repo I installed it from RPMForge, but I'm getting SELinux issues with it. http://lists.rpmforge.net/pipermail/users/2007-June/000798.html I'm very new to SELinux so I'm going to have to do some research to figure out how to apply that solution. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Madwifi just seems to work in Centos 5
Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:03:39AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have not installed the madwifi specific kernel stuff (kdml and hal-kdml) from atrpms. I have installed with wpa rpms. And my Atheros card is working with almost no work on my part (other than runing wpa_supplicant as a deamon). Nice! But how is that supposed to work? Perhaps you don't have an atheros chipset at all? If you have an atheros chipset then you will need madwifi/dadwifi and hal/openhal to use it. Oh, it is definitely the Atheros chipset. Given to me by my friends at Atheros at one of the 802.11 meetings over a year ago I was supprised/shocked. I was watching the boot and saw an attempt to aquire an IP address for wifi0. Gee, I had not configured my wireless card at all. Why did Kudzu discover the card, I had never installed the madwifi kernel drivers. Yeah, I DID install the WPA and wireless tools (wpa_supplicant, wpa_cli, wpa_dui, iwconfig, wlanconfig, etc) but not the madwifi-kmdl or madwifi-hal-kdml. So what is going on? All I had to do was to get the wpasupplicant running as a deamon, reading my wpasupplicant.conf file (with the PSK for my network), and I was Associated. Then grab a dhcp lease and off I went wirelessly. Is there any tool to analyse the kernel to see if the madwifi drivers are in the sauce? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Madwifi just seems to work in Centos 5
Robert Moskowitz wrote: Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:03:39AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have not installed the madwifi specific kernel stuff (kdml and hal-kdml) from atrpms. I have installed with wpa rpms. And my Atheros card is working with almost no work on my part (other than runing wpa_supplicant as a deamon). Nice! But how is that supposed to work? Perhaps you don't have an atheros chipset at all? If you have an atheros chipset then you will need madwifi/dadwifi and hal/openhal to use it. Oh, it is definitely the Atheros chipset. Given to me by my friends at Atheros at one of the 802.11 meetings over a year ago Well, we'll see... type lspci to hear about the card and lsmod to see what modules you have loaded, post the results. -Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Madwifi just seems to work in Centos 5
Andy Green wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:03:39AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have not installed the madwifi specific kernel stuff (kdml and hal-kdml) from atrpms. I have installed with wpa rpms. And my Atheros card is working with almost no work on my part (other than runing wpa_supplicant as a deamon). Nice! But how is that supposed to work? Perhaps you don't have an atheros chipset at all? If you have an atheros chipset then you will need madwifi/dadwifi and hal/openhal to use it. Oh, it is definitely the Atheros chipset. Given to me by my friends at Atheros at one of the 802.11 meetings over a year ago Well, we'll see... type lspci to hear about the card and lsmod to see what modules you have loaded, post the results. Will be rebooting to Centos 5 shortly. And with the lvm mounting (vgscan and vgchange) instructions, I might just get my email switched over and just respond from there! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Correct xen domains path
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 11:07 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:05:24AM -0400, Rick Barnes wrote: My preference was to use /srv/xen and then symlink /srv/xen/etc to /etc/xen and /srv/xen/images to /var/lib/xen/images My preference is to disable SELinux totally and use /xen as a seperate mount point :-) I keep repeating in a sheepish fashion: bad :p. -- Daniel ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GUI Login Screen for CentOS 5
On 6/18/07, Mark Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I installed CentOS using the option for a GUI Server with GRUB and GNOME. When it boots it stops at a text login screen, which is not desirable in our setup. I want it to start at the GUI login screen and not have to press 'Ctrl Alt F7' to bring this screen up. I thought this was controlled by /etc/inittab but it is setup correctly for runlevel 5. How can I correct this setup? Are you using the Xen kernel, or an ATI graphics card? This seems to be a recurring issue where those two bits are related. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Madwifi just seems to work in Centos 5
Migration in progress. But fonts are wrong in Thunderbird Andy Green wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:03:39AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have not installed the madwifi specific kernel stuff (kdml and hal-kdml) from atrpms. I have installed with wpa rpms. And my Atheros card is working with almost no work on my part (other than runing wpa_supplicant as a deamon). Nice! But how is that supposed to work? Perhaps you don't have an atheros chipset at all? If you have an atheros chipset then you will need madwifi/dadwifi and hal/openhal to use it. Oh, it is definitely the Atheros chipset. Given to me by my friends at Atheros at one of the 802.11 meetings over a year ago Well, we'll see... type lspci to hear about the card and lsmod to see what modules you have loaded, post the results. Here is the results from lspci and lsmod. There is ONE madwifi rpm installed: madwifi-0.9.2.1-2.el5.rf.i386.rpm and for wpa: wpa_supplicant-0.4.8-10.1.fc6.i386.rpm cat lspci.lst 00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS200/RS200M AGP Bridge [IGP 340M] (rev 02) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc PCI Bridge [IGP 340M] 00:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: ALi Corporation M5451 PCI AC-Link Controller Audio Device (rev 02) 00:07.0 ISA bridge: ALi Corporation M1533/M1535 PCI to ISA Bridge [Aladdin IV/V/V+] 00:08.0 Modem: ALi Corporation M5457 AC'97 Modem Controller 00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications, Inc. AR5212 802.11abg NIC (rev 01) 00:0b.0 CardBus bridge: O2 Micro, Inc. OZ711M1/MC1 4-in-1 MemoryCardBus Controller (rev 20) 00:0b.1 CardBus bridge: O2 Micro, Inc. OZ711M1/MC1 4-in-1 MemoryCardBus Controller (rev 20) 00:0b.2 System peripheral: O2 Micro, Inc. OZ711Mx 4-in-1 MemoryCardBus Accelerator 00:10.0 IDE interface: ALi Corporation M5229 IDE (rev c4) 00:11.0 Bridge: ALi Corporation M7101 Power Management Controller [PMU] 00:12.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43) 00:12.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43) 00:12.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 04) 00:13.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5705M Gigabit Ethernet (rev 03) 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon IGP 330M/340M/350M cat lsmod.lst Module Size Used by autofs423749 2 hidp 23105 2 rfcomm 42457 0 l2cap 29633 10 hidp,rfcomm bluetooth 53925 5 hidp,rfcomm,l2cap sunrpc142973 1 ip_conntrack_netbios_ns 6977 0 ipt_REJECT 9537 1 xt_state6209 3 ip_conntrack 53153 2 ip_conntrack_netbios_ns,xt_state nfnetlink 10713 1 ip_conntrack iptable_filter 7105 1 ip_tables 17029 1 iptable_filter ip6t_REJECT 9409 1 xt_tcpudp 7105 12 ip6table_filter 6849 1 ip6_tables 18181 1 ip6table_filter x_tables 17349 6 ipt_REJECT,xt_state,ip_tables,ip6t_REJECT,xt_tcpudp,ip6_tables cpufreq_ondemand 10573 1 video 19269 0 sbs18533 0 i2c_ec 9025 1 sbs button 10705 0 battery13637 0 asus_acpi 19289 0 ac 9157 0 radeon103905 2 drm65493 3 radeon ipv6 250369 19 ip6t_REJECT lp 15849 0 joydev 13185 0 snd_ali545125165 1 snd_ac97_codec 87009 1 snd_ali5451 snd_ac97_bus6337 1 snd_ac97_codec snd_seq_dummy 7877 0 snd_seq_oss32705 0 snd_seq_midi_event 11073 1 snd_seq_oss snd_seq49841 5 snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq_device 11853 3 snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq snd_pcm_oss42849 0 snd_mixer_oss 19137 1 snd_pcm_oss snd_pcm71621 3 snd_ali5451,snd_ac97_codec,snd_pcm_oss wlan_scan_sta 16128 0 snd_timer 24901 2 snd_seq,snd_pcm snd51909 11 snd_ali5451,snd_ac97_codec,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq,snd_seq_device,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_timer soundcore 13217 1 snd pcspkr 7105 0 snd_page_alloc 13641 1 snd_pcm parport_pc 29157 1 parport37513 2 lp,parport_pc ath_pci86180 0 ath_rate_sample16896 1 ath_pci wlan 172764 4 wlan_scan_sta,ath_pci,ath_rate_sample i2c_ali153510565 0 tg399781 0 i2c_ali15x311333 0 ath_hal 195280 3 ath_pci,ath_rate_sample serio_raw 10693 0 i2c_core 23745 3 i2c_ec,i2c_ali1535,i2c_ali15x3 dm_snapshot20581 0 dm_zero 6209 0
Re: [CentOS] Re: Madwifi just seems to work in Centos 5
The madwifi package from RPMForge contains all the needed bits for the Atheros chipsets. Into the bargain it uses the DKMS stuff to rebuild the modules when you install a new kernel, too, so no scrambling to install a new package to get your WiFi back. I'm using a similar setup, but trying NetworkManager to handle the heavy lifting, with excellent results. The laptop I'm using pretty much worked with no issues with a 3Com 3CRPAG175 and a Zyxel card, both Atheros-based. I've used it with no problems on AEP and WPA/WPA2 wireless LANs successfully. It was a pleasant surprise! -- Jay Leafey - Memphis, TN [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Madwifi just seems to work in Centos 5
Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:55:25AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:03:39AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have not installed the madwifi specific kernel stuff (kdml and hal-kdml) from atrpms. I have installed with wpa rpms. And my Atheros card is working with almost no work on my part (other than runing wpa_supplicant as a deamon). Here is the results from lspci and lsmod. There is ONE madwifi rpm installed: madwifi-0.9.2.1-2.el5.rf.i386.rpm ath_pci86180 0 ath_rate_sample16896 1 ath_pci wlan 172764 4 wlan_scan_sta,ath_pci,ath_rate_sample ath_hal 195280 3 ath_pci,ath_rate_sample So you are obviously using madwifi after all to drive the card. :) But where did it come from? I did not install the kernel driver rpms. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: Do you by any chance have atrpms enabled as a repo? As it happens, yes. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? A good thing definitely. :) What version of dovecot is now on your system? E.g. what's rpm -q dovecot saying? $ rpm -q dovecot dovecot-1.0.1-1_57.el4 I was thinking of dropping back to an earlier version to see if that makes a difference. -- Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Correct xen domains path
On 6/18/07, Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 05:46:27PM +0200, Daniel de Kok wrote: On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 11:07 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:05:24AM -0400, Rick Barnes wrote: My preference was to use /srv/xen and then symlink /srv/xen/etc to /etc/xen and /srv/xen/images to /var/lib/xen/images My preference is to disable SELinux totally and use /xen as a seperate mount point :-) I keep repeating in a sheepish fashion: bad :p. I've not heard a good reason to keep SELinux enabled, to be honest. For high sensitivity stuff, sure (much like using SEOS on Solaris for high sensitivity machines - eg those where third parties might have access). But as a general rule for all machines? Why? Being sheep like doesn't educate; a sheeplike post is... pointless. Ok.. I have had good and bad experience with Selinux. Good experience... I have had multiple webservers not have successful exploits because someone forgot to update phpBB or some such. Another good experience was dealing with a mail server compromise that didnt happen (it looked like it had but selinux had stomped the bad program when it tried to execute.) Bad experience... spending 8 hours because of a broken shipped policy that I needed to find a posting on to fix. Or trying to figure out why xen on my test system wasnt working because selinux policy doesnt do what it says it is supposed to do. However, overall I have found that spending 8-12 hours to read/learn Selinux was worth it. I believe that it and the SuSE tool are pretty much going to be needed in the future as Linux become more popular and hacking/breaking into it is more monetarily worthwhile to the mobs etc. Yes they add complexity.. but I am old enough to remember having to deal with people who thought that the Unix DAC rwx system was too complicated. Heck it was only 2 years ago I had to figure out what/why a system was compromised.. the reason was that the person was an NT person and had set everything on the system as that he could.. so that he didnt have to remember root passwds and all his applications just worked. [Effectively turning off Unix DAC as it were.] What I normally do is build system first with a default policy in place.. and if I cant figure out or have other issues.. I put selinux in permissive mode to work from there. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Madwifi just seems to work in Centos 5
Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 12:22:04PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:55:25AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:03:39AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have not installed the madwifi specific kernel stuff (kdml and hal-kdml) from atrpms. I have installed with wpa rpms. And my Atheros card is working with almost no work on my part (other than runing wpa_supplicant as a deamon). Here is the results from lspci and lsmod. There is ONE madwifi rpm installed: madwifi-0.9.2.1-2.el5.rf.i386.rpm ath_pci86180 0 ath_rate_sample16896 1 ath_pci wlan 172764 4 wlan_scan_sta,ath_pci,ath_rate_sample ath_hal 195280 3 ath_pci,ath_rate_sample So you are obviously using madwifi after all to drive the card. :) But where did it come from? I did not install the kernel driver rpms. madwifi-0.9.2.1-2.el5.rf.i386.rpm follows a different method that creates them on your system. There are pros and cons to using prebuilt binaries vs your own custom kernel modules. How do tell where these things came from and what method they use??? One of my 'issues' or feature requests is to know which repo an rpm came from provided it was installed via yum or yumex. Obviously if i downloaded the rpm and 'manually installed' directly with rpm, it is my job to track where I got the rpm from ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote: Because this stuff takes time to design and build and I need to do the job I get paid for SINCE noone will donate money to the CentOS Project and I have to eat? I would love to donate anything I could to CentOS. However, I am not in a situation to do so. I am (technically/legally) homeless, on disability retirement with no potential income in the foreseeable future. This is why you will never seem me complaining about the project, though. :-) -- Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Correct xen domains path
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:45:26PM +0200, Daniel de Kok wrote: On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 12:03 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote: I've not heard a good reason to keep SELinux enabled, to be honest. For high sensitivity stuff, sure (much like using SEOS on Solaris for high sensitivity machines - eg those where third parties might have access). But as a general rule for all machines? Why? One of the major goals of SELinux is to restrict the impact of 0-day vulnerabilities. If there is an ugly exploit for some network-facing daemon, it is a good idea to restrict the potential damage as possible. External facing machines (ie those that can be reached off the internal network) _are_ one of those classes of machines flagged as high sensitivity. These are candidates for SELinux, SEOS or equivalents. They may be either directly on the internet or in a DMZ area behind firewalls that allow certain incoming traffic (or in large corporations, accessed via VPNs or leased lines from customer sites; a different type of DMZ). The security rule of thumb here is that such machine _will_ be attacked, and so security in depth is the process to apply. But these are special cases with special elevated security rules. Now... why should such rules apply to machines not thus exposed? -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:02:07PM -0400, Joe Klemmer wrote: No config changes were made, just 'yum update'. No *.rpmnew files that I can find. Running rpm -V gives - $ rpm -V dovecot . c /etc/dovecot.conf This output means that /etc/dovecot.conf was modified. If it had been modified before the upgrade then the new config file lands under /etc/dovecot.conf.rpmnew. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpY7rud8jzwI.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ClamAV (was: antivirus)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:14:54AM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Saturday, June 16, 2007 4:57 PM -0600 Leonel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Centos 5 with clamav ??? Where is that ? Did you mean using dag's repo I installed it from RPMForge, but I'm getting SELinux issues with it. http://lists.rpmforge.net/pipermail/users/2007-June/000798.html I'm very new to SELinux so I'm going to have to do some research to figure out how to apply that solution. Ok, please disregard my last e-mail ehehehe You are actually pointing to my rules :) Save those rules to clamd.te, then: # checkmodule -M -m clamd.te -o clamd.mod # semodule_package -o clamd.pp -m clamd.mod # semodule -i clamd.pp Best Regards, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur Be excellent to each other ... - Bill Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGdrxwpdyWzQ5b5ckRAuFFAJ4taLl5Ua8M+9967ci6CskL8kSA1ACgwADT rizsiAdbx9aw29LkVc/cYGo= =RZC4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: $ rpm -V dovecot . c /etc/dovecot.conf This output means that /etc/dovecot.conf was modified. If it had been modified before the upgrade then the new config file lands under /etc/dovecot.conf.rpmnew. That's right, I did change the example email address from example.com to webtrek.com in the protocol lda section but that shouldn't hurt anything, should it? -- Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Correct xen domains path
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 12:56 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote: The security rule of thumb here is that such machine _will_ be attacked, and so security in depth is the process to apply. There are far more attack vectors than just through network facing daemons. To name just one example, web browsers. Unfortunately, Firefox is not yet protected by the targeted policy. Hopefully that will happen one day. -- Daniel ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:09:06PM -0400, Joe Klemmer wrote: On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: Personally I would recommend fixing the above, as the dovecot version as shipped by the upstream vendor (0.99.11 from 2004) is not maintained by the author anymore. See http://wiki.dovecot.org/UpgradingDovecot Maybe dropping back to 1.0.0-8_56.el4.at might be worth a test. I may try that later today. Was that the previous version? If so then the breakage is serious, as 1.0.1 is considered a stable bugfix release over 1.0.0. Please feed me (or directly the dovecot list) with any information you can gather. (Until now I though you were running 0.99.x previously) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpgL0A5mILhq.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:12:32PM -0400, Joe Klemmer wrote: On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: $ rpm -V dovecot . c /etc/dovecot.conf This output means that /etc/dovecot.conf was modified. If it had been modified before the upgrade then the new config file lands under /etc/dovecot.conf.rpmnew. That's right, I did change the example email address from example.com to webtrek.com in the protocol lda section but that shouldn't hurt anything, should it? No, certainly not :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpNNyepimRaX.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Correct xen domains path
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 07:17:54PM +0200, Daniel de Kok wrote: On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 12:56 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote: The security rule of thumb here is that such machine _will_ be attacked, and so security in depth is the process to apply. There are far more attack vectors than just through network facing daemons. To name just one example, web browsers. Unfortunately, Firefox is not yet protected by the targeted policy. Hopefully that will happen one day. Web browsers typically don't run as root and don't run on servers, but work stations. They also require users to access infected sites. Daemons on internet facing systems generally provide access to application data (eg a web application) or system resources (eg ssh) with higher priveleges and are candidates for automated zombie attacks and, therefore, have a much bigger risk profile. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On 6/18/07, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 21:00 -0400, Joe Klemmer wrote: Anyone run into this? I was planning to upgrade the box to CentOS 5 next month but I may do it sooner if it will fix this. I just did an upgrade on a CentOS 4 server, and dovecot won't even install for me. I keep getting this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo rpm -Uvh dovecot-0.99.11-8.EL4.i386.rpm Preparing...### [100%] error: %pre(dovecot-0.99.11-8.EL4.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 error: install: %pre scriptlet failed (2), skipping dovecot-0.99.11-8.EL4 This means that the pre-install script failed on the rpm. you can see what this is by running rpm -q --scripts dovecot I also can't shutdown anymore. When I do a reboot or shutdown -r now, I get this: This is unrelated (to the original poster's issue) and is possible thread hi-jacking. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# shutdown -h now Broadcast message from root (pts/0) (Mon Jun 18 00:58:20 2007): The system is going down for system halt NOW! init: timeout opening/writing control channel /dev/initctl What the hell is going on? Look in your logs for details. Do you have selinux enabled? If so, it's possible that some of your files have invalid selinux contexts. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Justin Morgan is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 18/06/2007 and will not return until 02/07/2007. I will respond to your message when I return. For urgent matters please contact Panbio Reception for assistance : +617 3363 7100. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Justin Morgan is out of the office.
Justin, Thanks for letting us all know. We'll keep an eye on your house while you're gone and just to make sure that your house looks lived in we'll throw parties each night. Don't worry we won't forget about you, we'll let you clean up when you get back. Have a great trip -matt On 6/18/07, Justin Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will be out of the office starting 18/06/2007 and will not return until 02/07/2007. I will respond to your message when I return. For urgent matters please contact Panbio Reception for assistance : +617 3363 7100. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Correct xen domains path
On 6/18/07, Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:31:30AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 6/18/07, Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've not heard a good reason to keep SELinux enabled, to be honest. For high sensitivity stuff, sure (much like using SEOS on Solaris for high sensitivity machines - eg those where third parties might have access). But as a general rule for all machines? Why? Good experience... I have had multiple webservers not have successful Yup. Webservers are machines where third parties might have access, and so are candidates for enhanced security processes such as SELinux or SEOS. I've never said there are _no_ cases for SELinux. I was questioning it as a general rule for all machines. Several of the problems were machines that were not connected to the internet or were deep behind firewalls. The problems were that all it takes is one user who doesnt think well to make all those firewalls/issues useless. E.G the person who coming in from work finds a nice shiney USB fob and plugs it into a work computer to see who it belonged to so they could return it. The guy who downloads an attachment supposedly from the partner in France and wonders why the system runs so slowly. The fellow who has an addiction to porn and decides that he just has to meet that 'blonde' who just wrote him about sharing pictures. Etc etc. While a lot of these things sound Windows specific.. there is a boutique industry in doing it for Linux especially when you know that the company you are wanting to infiltrate is using Linux for 'security means'. Or to be direct.. there is no such thing as a secure computer.. it is up to you as the site administrator to determine what is safe enough for Your Site using appropriate risk management. If you believe your site has enough methods of protection or are that the cost of extra security (selinux) is not appropriate for your risk model.. you can turn it off. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Centos 5 - Setting up yum for ATrpms
On Monday 18 June 2007, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 12:43:00PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: ... What do I use in my atrmps.repo to get it to access the RL5 directories? There is a package called atrpms-package-config, but you can just as well simply cut and paste the following. ... Thanks a bunch for this. I have to boot back to Centos 4 for a bit (figure out what is wrong with my Thunderbird setup), then come back and try this. I use yumex, and first do everything stable. Then if I am looking for things, then I enable bleeding and testing. I should note that at least until recently, the wpasupplicant was over at either testing or bleeding, don't remember which right now... And while you are fiddeling with your yum config, do yourself (and possibly this list) a favor and read up on and configure either protectbase or priorites (those are yum plugins). /Peter pgp0w4Hd9aICn.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
I've had a similar problem that I haven't been able to resolve yet. I downgraded to dovecot 1.0.0 (from atrpms) and all is well. I think that the authentication methods are changing and I was planning some research tomorrow. Hope this helps. daveh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Correct xen domains path
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 12:18:40PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 6/18/07, Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've never said there are _no_ cases for SELinux. I was questioning it as a general rule for all machines. Several of the problems were machines that were not connected to the internet or were deep behind firewalls. The problems were that all it takes is one user who doesnt think well to make all those firewalls/issues useless. E.G the person who coming in from work finds a nice shiney USB fob and plugs it into a work computer to see who it belonged to so they could return it. The guy who downloads an [ etc ] This is why I mentioned risk profile in another message. You evaluate the perceived risk, the likely-hood of the event happening, the cost of the event, the cost of a potential solution and perform an analysis. So one might rank the items this: external facing servers: high risk! Automated attacks possible Desktop work stations: moderate. User stupidity highest attack vector General compute server: low risk. Only trained staff have access. Each of those profiles have different uses and require different solutions. On a DMZ machine you probably wouldn't use unauthenticated naming services (eg LDAP with SSL certs is OK, NIS is bad!). SELinux or SEOS is a very good idea. chroot'd daemons, maybe read-only filesystems, disable unecessary setuid programs, minimal install. Disable hotplug ports. On a desktop you need GUIs. Centralised naming services. Roaming profiles. Maybe a netboot'd image (no local storage). Disable hotplug ports, or at least minimise scope so that only authorised devices (Blackberry's, whatever) can sync. In particular mass storage isn't allowed. End users don't have root access. General compute server... well, now we have further ranking; prod/dev/uat boxes have different risk profiles. SOX scoped boxes even more. And so on. (Umm, sorry for going on... I work in an area where these things are every day considerations so...) up to you as the site administrator to determine what is safe enough Actually, in large companies you have a whole risk organisational structure whose job it is to evaluate these things and determine policy. They straddle the line between technology (my side) and business (my customer) needs and try to balance the two. for Your Site using appropriate risk management. If you believe your site has enough methods of protection or are that the cost of extra security (selinux) is not appropriate for your risk model.. you can turn it off. I'd argue the opposite; if you feel you the risk exposure is such that you need the protection then enable it. I've listed cases where this is the case. That cases exist for SELinux does not mean it should be on by default, and is definitely not deserving of a sheeplike response whenever anyone proposes otherwise. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Do I really have the right ATrpms repo?
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 05:18:41PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I copied exactly where Axel provided into atrmps.repo. I have the line: atrpms.repo:baseurl=http://dl.atrpms.net/el5-x86_64/atrpms/stable but the rpms that are being flagged as updates pretty much all have fc5 in their names. e.g.: --- Package mplayer-fonts.noarch 4:1.0-7.at set to be updated --- Package mplayer.i386 4:1.0-60_r23482.fc5 set to be updated --- Package zonecheck.noarch 0:2.0.4-3.fc5.at set to be updated ??? Prhaps you still have another *.repo file somewhere, or yum stull remembers the old settings you had? Also check /etc/yum.conf, then try yum clean all yum update -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpW91LnLQSR2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Dave Hatton wrote: I've had a similar problem that I haven't been able to resolve yet. I downgraded to dovecot 1.0.0 (from atrpms) and all is well. I think that the authentication methods are changing and I was planning some research tomorrow. Hope this helps. It does. I was just thinking of trying that so I'll give it a shot and see what happens. I do wish yum had a facility for downgrading versions. I just did a search on atrpms stable for dovecot and it's no longer there. There is a dovecot-sieve rpm. I had to downgrade all the way back to 0.99.11-8.EL4 from the base repo to get things working again. -- Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 5 and Xen Windows domU
Has anyone been able to get a Xen Windows domU to install or work properly
on CentOS 5? I'm trying to do that now. It's able to boot and start he
installation (from ISO), but after partitioning the disk and copying a few
files to the hard drive, it cannot boot into the graphical installer. This
is the config file I'm using:
import os, re
arch = os.uname()[4]
if re.search('64', arch):
arch_libdir = 'lib64'
else:
arch_libdir = 'lib'
kernel = /usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader
builder='hvm'
memory = 1024
shadow_memory = 520
name = acw2
vcpus=4
vif = [ 'type=ioemu, mac=00:18:32:6c:00:ba, bridge=xenbr0' ]
disk = [ 'phy:/dev/acw1/acw2,ioemu:hda,w',
'file:/isos/en_ws_2003_std_sp1_vl.iso,ioemu:hdc:cdrom,r' ]
cdrom='/dev/hdc'
boot='dca'
#boot='a'
device_model = '/usr/' + arch_libdir + '/xen/bin/qemu-dm'
sdl=0
vnclisten=10.1.34.108
vnc=1
vncdisplay=2
vncconsole=0
vncpasswd=''
stdvga=1
serial='pty'
on_reboot = 'preserve'
on_crash = 'preserve'
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Wireless mouse problem
Hello all, Just for kicks I plugged in a Microsoft wireless optical desktop 1000 keyboard/mouse combo into my Centos 4.5 machine. It recognized it on boot and configured it and it mostly works good. The issue is with the mouse, when I hold it over a folder on my desktop for a second or so it grabs the folder and opens a small menu as if I was using my middle button on my Logitech. All this happens without me touching a button. It also opens links in firefox (seemingly at random) and brings background windows to the front as soon as the cursor touches them. I know it's probably my punishment for using something with that name on it, but I really didn't expect it to work as well as it does. Does anyone have any ideas of config files or any other things I could try to get this working better. It is a USB keyboard/mouse with a single receiver, and the machine is fully updated. Thanks, Marvin E. -- P Marvin Eberly [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 5 USB Kickstart?
Is anybody else having problems with CentOS 5 not loading the usb drivers for kickstart installations? I'm passing linux ks=hd:sdb1:/ks.cfg, but I get a message saying it can't find the ks.cfg file and I should enter another path. I use the exact same boot options with CentOS 4 without any problems. What am I missing with CentOS 5? Thanks for any tips. -- Jiann-Ming Su I have to decide between two equally frightening options. If I wanted to do that, I'd vote. --Duckman The system's broke, Hank. The election baby has peed in the bath water. You got to throw 'em both out. --Dale Gribble Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything. --Joseph Stalin -- Jiann-Ming Su I have to decide between two equally frightening options. If I wanted to do that, I'd vote. --Duckman The system's broke, Hank. The election baby has peed in the bath water. You got to throw 'em both out. --Dale Gribble Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything. --Joseph Stalin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] yumex 'crashed' - anyway to resume?
I spent quite a bit of time setting up what I wanted to update and install via yumex. I left my system for a few minutes to attend to another computer. A helpful family member logged me off without checking. So can I recapture what I had queued? I cannot find anything that looks like a yumex queue file. yum.log does not have any updates from today :( ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] PXE problems with syslinux 3.51
Anyone else seeing problems doing pxe boots off the latest dag/rpmforge syslinux packages? Versions 3.35 works, doing the tftp request like this: Jun 18 06:01:19 boothost in.tftpd[25947]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename /centos5-i386/pxelinux.0 Jun 18 06:01:19 boothost in.tftpd[25947]: tftp: client does not accept options Jun 18 06:01:19 boothost in.tftpd[25948]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename /centos5-i386/pxelinux.0 Jun 18 06:01:19 boothost in.tftpd[25950]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename /centos5-i386/pxelinux.cfg/03-03-13-83-83-d3-a3 Jun 18 06:01:19 boothost in.tftpd[25951]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename /centos5-i386/pxelinux.cfg/AC10001A Jun 18 06:01:19 boothost in.tftpd[25957]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename /centos5-i386/vmlinuz Jun 18 06:01:19 boothost in.tftpd[25958]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename /centos5-i386/initrd.img Versions 3.50 and 3.51 request the filenames without the leading /centos5-i386, and fail: Jun 18 06:05:13 boothost in.tftpd[25947]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename /centos5-i386/pxelinux.0 Jun 18 06:05:13 boothost in.tftpd[25947]: tftp: client does not accept options Jun 18 06:05:13 boothost in.tftpd[25948]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename /centos5-i386/pxelinux.0 Jun 18 06:05:13 boothost in.tftpd[25949]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename pxelinux.cfg/44454c4c-3300-1033-8050-abcdef4e3153 Jun 18 06:05:13 boothost in.tftpd[25950]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename pxelinux.cfg/03-03-13-83-83-d3-a3 Jun 18 06:05:13 boothost in.tftpd[25951]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename pxelinux.cfg/AC10001A Jun 18 06:05:13 boothost in.tftpd[25952]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename pxelinux.cfg/AC10001 Jun 18 06:05:13 boothost in.tftpd[25953]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename pxelinux.cfg/AC1000 Jun 18 06:05:13 boothost in.tftpd[25954]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename pxelinux.cfg/AC100 Jun 18 06:05:13 boothost in.tftpd[25955]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename pxelinux.cfg/AC10 Jun 18 06:05:13 boothost in.tftpd[25956]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename pxelinux.cfg/AC1 Jun 18 06:05:13 boothost in.tftpd[25957]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename pxelinux.cfg/AC Jun 18 06:05:13 boothost in.tftpd[25958]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename pxelinux.cfg/A Jun 18 06:05:13 boothost in.tftpd[25959]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename pxelinux.cfg/default Any cluesticks on solving this? For now I've just reverted to 3.35, but it would be nice to get it working with the current release. Cheers, Gavin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Gnome Taskbar(s)
Question: All the newer Gnome distributions seem to configure themselves with two small taskbars (panels, I guess) one at the top and one at the bottom. I prefer the older scheme with one larger one (usually) at the bottom. When I install Centos5 in the near future I'm going to want to be able to restore the old-style panels. Anybody know what I need to change to make it work in the old way? Thanks! -- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. -- Philippians 4:13 --- pgp5UGye5OMvF.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
