[CentOS-docs] [artwork] Image for external links
Hi, Can we use the same image for external links on the wiki as we are using for Trac ? It is much less obtrusive in pieces of text. A gray box with arrow instead of a colorful globe. -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...
Ned Slider wrote: Having given this much thought (mostly around my available free time), if it's not too late I'd also like to also raise my hand and in so doing give this thread a little bump. Good, let us get this on the way then (I'm sorry, I'm not really available on weekends at the moment so things on a slightly larger scale take a while). Also, whilst undergoing this process, would it also be a good time to request and/or formalize a documentation SIG as there doesn't appear to be one at present. Presumably those who have raised their hands would be obvious candidates for such a SIG. Ummm. I thought this was it? Or please rephrase what you mean by documentation SIG ... Cheers, Ralph pgpUD5drJcNdM.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ned Slider wrote: Also, whilst undergoing this process, would it also be a good time to request and/or formalize a documentation SIG as there doesn't appear to be one at present. Presumably those who have raised their hands would be obvious candidates for such a SIG. Ummm. I thought this was it? Or please rephrase what you mean by documentation SIG ... Well, it is listed under Future SIGs: http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup Akemi ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...
Akemi Yagi wrote: On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ned Slider wrote: Also, whilst undergoing this process, would it also be a good time to request and/or formalize a documentation SIG as there doesn't appear to be one at present. Presumably those who have raised their hands would be obvious candidates for such a SIG. Ummm. I thought this was it? Or please rephrase what you mean by documentation SIG ... Well, it is listed under Future SIGs: http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup Akemi Yes, that's all I meant :-) ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-virt] Can't get USB printer visible in guest
What GUI tool are you trying to use here? Virtual Machine Manager as shipped with CentOS ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda en tema de tesis
Linux es un mundo, y temas hay muchos, es mejor que definas un area de INTERES y sobre eso puedas ir moldeando tu tema de tesis; por otra parte, generalmente las tesis (hablo por mi universidad http://www.unam.mx) son de caracter teórico, mi recomendación es que te enfoques en algo práctico o que tenga un beneficio tanto para ti como para la sociedad, por lo pronto puedo sugerite áreas de desarrollo como: - Desarrollo de Sistemas. - Investigación - Enfoque de consultoría de servicios (Seguridad) En fin, temas hay muchos y creo que son los mismos que te han recomendado, solamente es que descubras tu área de interes. Saludos. 2008/11/1 Arturo Limón [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Te diría que pienses a qué puedes aplicar Linux que pueda tener impacto, resultar llamativo. No sé si te servirá, pero así que se me ocurra: - Linux en Educación: reducción de costos, formación de estudiantes en tecnologías abiertas, etc. - Linux en sistemas embebidos: dispositivos hardware varios, automóviles, electrodomésticos, domótica, etc. - Linux para PC's dedicados: sistemas de seguridad y control, monitorización de procesos industriales, etc. - Linux como paradigma del modelo de desarrollo de software libre, frente al modelo de desarrollo de software propietario; diferencias, ventajas de un modelo y otro, cuando si se puede / no se puede aplicar el modelo de software libre, etc. Saludos, 2008/11/1 Juan Carlos Chavarrea [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hola, a todos, estoy terminando un Post-Grado en Informatica Aplicada y nos piden temas de Tesis, pido ayuda a todos los Linuxceros, me ayuden con temas de tesis basados en Centos. Les agradeceria Mucho. Explore the seven wonders of the world Learn more! ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- :: L.I. Ricardo D. Carrillo Sánchez :: Security Specialist :: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico:: :: Ciudad Universitaria , D.F. Mex :: e-mail prim.: davxoc at gmai dot com :: e-mail secu.: davxoc at hotmail dot com : ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] instalar
No se entiende la pregunta, puedes aclaralo de mejor forma, si es una máquina virtual, no sería mejor crear otra nueva y volver a intentar, que se de virtualización tienes.? ? 2008/11/1 ROXANA AGUILAR [EMAIL PROTECTED]: HOLA: me podrian ayudar nesecito instalar el centos 5.2 en una maquina virtual en modo texto. Pero cuando la vuelva a iniciar quede guardado el SISTEMA OPERATIVO. por favor si alguien sabe. ROXI FOR EVER From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 22, Envío 38 To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:00:25 + Envie los mensajes para la lista CentOS-es a centos-es@centos.org Para subscribirse o anular su subscripción a través de WEB http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es O por correo electrónico, enviando un mensaje con el texto help en el asunto (subject) o en el cuerpo a: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Puede contactar con el responsable de la lista escribiendo a: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Si responde a algún contenido de este mensaje, por favor, edite la linea del asunto (subject) para que el texto sea mas especifico que: Re: Contents of CentOS-es digest Ademas, por favor, incluya en la respuesta solo aquellas partes del mensaje a las que esta respondiendo. Asuntos del día: 1. Re: centos 5 (Alejandro) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:45:48 -0200 From: Alejandro [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] centos 5 To: centos-es@centos.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Gente en www.linuxiso.com.ar/centos/ voy continuamente actualizando los links y ademas hay mas info acerca de la distro Saludos On 10/25/08, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alejandro Garrido wrote: Hola como estan, estoy tratando de bajar centos 5 y no puedo, alquien me podría decir de cual servidor es mas fiable o en que pagina voy a para 32 bits: http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/centos/5.2/isos/i386/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-DVD.torrent para 64 bits: http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/centos/5.2/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.2-x86_64-bin-DVD.torrent Aqui explico cómo bajar un iso: http://www.ecualug.org/?q=2008/09/26/comos/como_bajar_la_imagen_de_centos saludos epe encontrarlo, una vez vi que venia en un solo dvd pero ahora no lo encuentro, sabrían si esta disponible todavía, mi error fue prestar mis cd´s de centos 4 a un compa de la facu y ahí se fueron y nunca me los trae. Bueno un saludo y éxitos Alejandro Garrido ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Sent from my mobile device -- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Fin de Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 22, Envío 38 * Entra en contacto con el atleta que hay en ti. Haz la prueba. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- :: L.I. Ricardo D. Carrillo Sánchez :: Security Specialist :: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico:: :: Ciudad Universitaria , D.F. Mex :: e-mail prim.: davxoc at gmai dot com :: e-mail secu.: davxoc at hotmail dot com : ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Clonacion de disco
Hola , gparted es buena opción, otra forma de particionarlo es desde la línea de comandos utilzando fdisk, este cuando lo ejecutas (fdisk /dev/hba o en su caso para ver las particiones fdisk -l) puedes determinar de que capacidad es tu disco, pero con este comando si hay que tener claros los conceptos que forman a un disco duro (cabezas, sectores y cilindros). Saludos. 2008/10/29 gabriel lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Para particionar manualmente yo uso gparted. Casi todas las distribuciones lo tienen. Solo que ten cuidado con lo que haces no sea que borres lo que tienes. Suerte Gabriel Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:32:56 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: centos-es@centos.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Clonacion de disco CC: Prueba http://clonezilla.org/ Suerte Nightduke 2008/10/29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Hola a todos, Tengo un servidor CentOS 5.2 con un disco de 40 GB y lo he clonado con el programa G4L a uno de 250GB, todo va bien, excepto que me marca que el disco de 250GB es de 40GB y si voy a administracion de volumenes logicos me sale el resto del espacio de disco pero como uncategorized y me pone particinonar manualmente. Mi pregunta es ¿como particiono lo que me falta de disco? Gracias. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es _ Explore the seven wonders of the world http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+worldmkt=en-USform=QBRE___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- :: L.I. Ricardo D. Carrillo Sánchez :: Security Specialist :: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico:: :: Ciudad Universitaria , D.F. Mex :: e-mail prim.: davxoc at gmai dot com :: e-mail secu.: davxoc at hotmail dot com : ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] ayuda con esto q no entiendo pls
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: jueves, 30 de octubre de 2008 11:17 a.m. Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: ezmlm warning Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. I'm working for my owner, who can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Messages to you from the gammacargo mailing list seem to have been bouncing. I've attached a copy of the first bounce message I received. If this message bounces too, I will send you a probe. If the probe bounces, I will remove your address from the gammacargo mailing list, without further notice. I've kept a list of which messages from the gammacargo mailing list have bounced from your address. Copies of these messages may be in the archive. To retrieve a set of messages 123-145 (a maximum of 100 per request), send an empty message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To receive a subject and author list for the last 100 or so messages, send an empty message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here are the message numbers: 95 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] Problem with widescreen display
On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 22:08 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote: I have a dual boot CentOS 5.2 / FC4 machine, and recently I have bought a new widescreen tft monitor. I used to use a plain 4:3 crt, and after plugging the 16:9 tft naturally X needed reconfiguring. This was easy in FC4, and seemed as easy in CentOS, but with a wrong result. Basically, what I did was to run system-config-display to reconfigure for the new monitor and resolution. All goes well, but after X restarts, I see a strange picture: the resolution indeed goes to 1680x1050 as is supposed to, but is squeezed/shrinked/scaled horizontally to match a 4:3 aspect ratio, leaving two (unequal) black bands on the left and right side of the monitor. This sounds like the Modes line in the Subsection Display may not have the right settings. The manual/CD for the monitor should have the right settings. I would compare those against what the configuration process generated and manually edit if needed. Why the difference between FC4 and CentOS, I can't guess. I don't have the URL, but some time ago I googled and found a very detailed description of the modes, their effects, blanking (the black bands) and the relationship of all those. Go googling if you think if might help. snip Btw, this is on an nVidia GeForce 4 using the default nv driver. The vesa driver doesn't support widescreen resolutions, while nvidia binary driver crashes X completely on start (but this is a known motherboard problem common to FC4 as well). Have you tried the nvidia drivers from rpmforge? It has drivers for both the older and newer nVidia cards, all ready for CentOS. I'm using the older driver now (standard CRT though, not a newer LCD/TFT wide-aspect screen) and it works flawlessly. I've also used the stuff from the nvidia site, but abandoned it as soon as I found the older driver on rpmforge. So I can't say if that's a better way to go. Several on the list have espoused that route and had good results. Is there some kernel setting or whatever that might force the graphics card to 4:3 aspect irrespective of X configuration? Some filter between what X tries to display and the actual signal to the monitor? What else can I try? All I can think of is that Modes line I mentioned above. Any advice appreciated! Best, :-) Marko snip Sig stuff HTH -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Question re RHEL 5.3
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:03 AM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nov 2 01:56:11 mhrichter smartd[3121]: Device: /dev/sda, 4294967295 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Nov 2 01:56:11 mhrichter smartd[3121]: Device: /dev/sda, 4294967295 Offline uncorrectable sectors In each case, it also sends a warning email to root, which is kind of annoying since these do not appear to be legitimate error conditions. Someone mentioned that this is a recurring problem with Seagate drives - more info, please? You might want to check out the following CentOS forum thread. I, too, had the same problem (see comment #3). http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flattopic_id=15880forum=39 Akemi / toracat ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem with widescreen display
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Marko Vojinovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a dual boot CentOS 5.2 / FC4 machine, and recently I have bought a new widescreen tft monitor. I used to use a plain 4:3 crt, and after plugging the 16:9 tft naturally X needed reconfiguring. This was easy in FC4, and seemed as easy in CentOS, but with a wrong result. As some wise person suggested to me when I had this problem about three months ago, did you also set the screen resolution in System-Preferences? IIRC, that solved the problem on my machine. HTH mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Question re RHEL 5.3
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mhr wrote on Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:59:40 -0700: The one problem I've seen and posted here was w.r.t. smartd error reports showing 2^32 - 1 errors on one of the disks (probably my system disk) every few minutes. How has this anything to do with SATA problems/drive handling? Possibly because my system drive is a SATA disk? (FTR, the drive does not appear to be the slightest bit unstable and it runs just fine. In fact, I recently modified the system so that it now runs on three SATA-2 drives exclusively. For whatever reason, the WD drives do not report any errors - see also below.) And could you please use a decent subject next time? When I select the subject, I usually do. This was a reply to a thread, so I didn't pick the subject. There's no need to be testy Regarding your problem: Have you done a smartctl selftest since then, did you go to smartmontools.sf.net since then and read up on smartmon? Yes and not until now, in that order. The smartctl selftest has the same problem, IIRC, but the seatools test showed nothing wrong. This may just be a problem with smartd not being able to handle the error codes/number of errors from that disk. If you look at smartmontools.sf.net and read the man you'll see that vendors are quite inconsistent in what and how they report and a reversal of byte ordering every now and then seems to be common. Not to mention that ther smartmon shipping with CentOS naturally doesn't include the latest code. All good information, thank you. I did not see anything specific to the issue I am seeing, which is that every half hour, smartd reports the following: Nov 2 01:56:11 mhrichter smartd[3121]: Device: /dev/sda, 4294967295 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Nov 2 01:56:11 mhrichter smartd[3121]: Device: /dev/sda, 4294967295 Offline uncorrectable sectors In each case, it also sends a warning email to root, which is kind of annoying since these do not appear to be legitimate error conditions. Someone mentioned that this is a recurring problem with Seagate drives - more info, please? Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Repository for Red Hat Enterprise IPA?
Hello list, Last week i read a interesting artice about Red Hat Enterprise IPA / Free IPA. Is there a Repository for this packages yet? Greetings Sebastian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Upgrade then sudden death..
John R Pierce wrote: I recently put Cent 5.2 (64 bit) on a new server using a Supermicro pdsbm-ln2+ sys board. I did the original installation at home using the 5.2 dvd I got via torrent. Try a software-RAID. (I just assume you used the built-in RAID, which is more likely than not a cheap pseudo-RAID - there's a reason why even Microsoft doesn't use it in their home-server product) indeed, a quick lookup of that board says its ICH7R 'intel matrix' raid, which is indeed pseudo-raid, implemented in the BIOS and drivers. http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon3000/946/PDSBM-LN2+.cfm ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos agreed..turn off the mobo raid(since that's a desktop chipset anyways) and use the linux md raid. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] List of all email users
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
This is not CentOS-specific, hence OT.
I need a list of all email users on my system (there are hundreds of them).
The list could be extracted from /etc/aliases and the virtusertable.
Does anyone know of a script that would do this automatically? It would have
to
- exclude commented-out lines (of course)
and exclude continuation lines (lines starting with spaces).
- exclude duplicates
- produce a list of usernames (or maybe unresolved email addresses for some
users) separated by a comma
why comma? isn't LF better (one user per line)?
I imagine perl would be the way to go. I haven't used perl at all myself.
you could start with something like
getkey()
{
files=$*
for file in $files; do
sed -e '/^[\# ]/d' -e '/^$/d' $file | \
awk -F'[: ]' '{print $1}'
done
}
getkey /etc/aliases /etc/passwd | sort|uniq users.local
getkey yourvirtualmap users.virtual
If you want a list of all valid email addresses, you need to append the
domains in mydestination to users.local.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote: I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk processing, tagging images, etc. Its part image database and part image manipulator. Link? Please? Digicam gives too many hits on search engine even with refining the search. (Lurking and inquisitive) Sorry, I did mean Digikam. As you might imply from the k substituting for the c, its a KDE application (although it works fine in a gnome environment.) www.digikam.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Michael Semcheski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote: I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk processing, tagging images, etc. Its part image database and part image manipulator. Link? Please? Digicam gives too many hits on search engine even with refining the search. (Lurking and inquisitive) Sorry, I did mean Digikam. As you might imply from the k substituting for the c, its a KDE application (although it works fine in a gnome environment.) www.digikam.org Michael: Thank you. I will look into Digikam. At first, I thought (assumed) the camcorder we were going to get was MiniDV, but, it uses mini DVDs. So, I just removed kino and Cinelerra looks like it has a learning curve and no online help. I will look into Digikam. Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
Am 02.11.2008 um 20:57 schrieb Lanny Marcus: On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Michael Semcheski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote: I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk processing, tagging images, etc. Its part image database and part image manipulator. Link? Please? Digicam gives too many hits on search engine even with refining the search. (Lurking and inquisitive) Sorry, I did mean Digikam. As you might imply from the k substituting for the c, its a KDE application (although it works fine in a gnome environment.) www.digikam.org Michael: Thank you. I will look into Digikam. At first, I thought (assumed) the camcorder we were going to get was MiniDV, but, it uses mini DVDs. I have a co-worker who also has such a camcorder. He hates it;-) Because to edit these films, you've basically got to re-rip these DVDs Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Repository for Red Hat Enterprise IPA?
Sebastian Marten wrote: Hello list, Last week i read a interesting artice about Red Hat Enterprise IPA / Free IPA. Is there a Repository for this packages yet? you can always call your redhat sales guy and talk to them about it. on the CentOS front, Tim is leading up the effort on IPA / Directory Server. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Rainer Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Sorry, I did mean Digikam. As you might imply from the k substituting for the c, its a KDE application (although it works fine in a gnome environment.) www.digikam.org Michael: Thank you. I will look into Digikam. At first, I thought (assumed) the camcorder we were going to get was MiniDV, but, it uses mini DVDs. I have a co-worker who also has such a camcorder. He hates it;-) Because to edit these films, you've basically got to re-rip these DVDs I hope our luck with the mini DVD camcorder will be better! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] [rsync -avz] total size/disk usage difference between source and destination
Hi folks We migrated storage from local disk to SAN with: # rsync -avz /mnt/lvol00045/* /lvol00045 Why there is a difference in size? How to explain this? Do we have inconsistency? What we did wrong? [...] /dev/mapper/vg01-lvol00045_old 10321208 3930336 6286016 39% /mnt/lvol00045 [...] /dev/mapper/vg01-lvol00045 10321208 3163852 6633068 33% /lvol00045 [...] kind regards Sven ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [rsync -avz] total size/disk usage difference between source and destination
Sven wrote: Hi folks We migrated storage from local disk to SAN with: # rsync -avz /mnt/lvol00045/* /lvol00045 Why there is a difference in size? How to explain this? Do we have inconsistency? What we did wrong? [...] /dev/mapper/vg01-lvol00045_old 10321208 3930336 6286016 39% /mnt/lvol00045 [...] /dev/mapper/vg01-lvol00045 10321208 3163852 6633068 33% /lvol00045 did rsync copy .* hidden files ? do the two file systems have the same block size? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [rsync -avz] total size/disk usage difference between source and destination
John R Pierce wrote: Sven wrote: Hi folks We migrated storage from local disk to SAN with: # rsync -avz /mnt/lvol00045/* /lvol00045 Why there is a difference in size? How to explain this? Do we have inconsistency? What we did wrong? [...] /dev/mapper/vg01-lvol00045_old 10321208 3930336 6286016 39% /mnt/lvol00045 [...] /dev/mapper/vg01-lvol00045 10321208 3163852 6633068 33% /lvol00045 did rsync copy .* hidden files ? do the two file systems have the same block size? Rsync would copy hidden files when recursing as a side effect of the -a option. However, the shell is going to expand that '*' before rsync sees the command line and miss any hidden files in the top level directory. I'd probably have done: cd /mnt/lvo100045 rsync -avH . /lvo00045 instead. That gives rsync a directory as a starting point without having to remember the quirks of whether it will or won't create a subdirectory of that name on the target. It also doesn't make sense to use -z for a local file copy and you might need -H if you have hardlinked files on the filesystem. -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dazuko module Panda Antivirus
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:26 AM, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Gopinath Achari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I installed Panda antivirus for linux but it uses Dazuko module for updating virus definition downloaded from internet to virus definitions database. So i downloaded dazuko ( tar package) software and tryed to install. But it generates the below defined errors, Which module in the kernel has to be enabled. Please help me i am using Centos 5.2 with kernel version of 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5xen (snip) error: capabilities are built-in to the kernel: you will need to recompile a kernel with capabilities as a kernel module This is a known issue with Dazuko. You can find some hint/solution in this forum thread: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=12894forum=28post_id=43082#forumpost43082 I have built the latest kernel (2.6.18-92.1.13) with capabilities as a kernel module. If you wish to test the dazuko installation, you can get it from here: http://centos.toracat.org/kernel/c5plus_capabilities/ This is based on the centosplus kernel but should work just fine for the testing. Besides, if (and this is a big if) this change is adopted in the CentOS kernel, it would be in the cplus kernel. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
