Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On 12/01/2010 11:11 PM, John Hodrien wrote: > > I've had Broadcom NICs just go off into their own little world requiring the > machine to be physically powered down and back up again before they'd start > working again. Replaced with an Intel quad port board (igb driver) and all > was decidedly well. I've seen that happen, too. I wouldn't recommend Broadcom gear, either. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote: > Well, Realcrap is known to be crap everywhere. Ask the OpenBSD guys. ;) > > Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there > are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an > internal design glitch. I've had Broadcom NICs just go off into their own little world requiring the machine to be physically powered down and back up again before they'd start working again. Replaced with an Intel quad port board (igb driver) and all was decidedly well. jh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On 12/1/2010 2:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste > wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote: >>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an internal design glitch. >>> Seconded. I have a load of Intel 82576 and 82571EB's, and there have been >>> no issues at all, including with Jumbo frames. >> Thirded. :-) Same thing here, even with generic Intel 1 GB Ethernet cards. >> >> *** >> Gilbert Sebenste >> (My opinions only!) ** >> *** >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > Thanks. Looks good. > > I just looked around - looks like manufacturers tend not to list the > chipset in their NIC specifications (like here, for instance: > http://www.trendnet.com/products/proddetail.asp?prod=140_TEG-PCITXR&cat=14 > ) > > Is there a list somewhere out there listing what card features what chipset? > > It definitely looks like it is best to just stick to the better > chipsets - might be a little more expensive but definitely worth the > money. > > Thanks. > > Boris. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos if you look at the pic on that page see the crab? that's realtek. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On 12/1/2010 2:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste > wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote: >>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an internal design glitch. >>> Seconded. I have a load of Intel 82576 and 82571EB's, and there have been >>> no issues at all, including with Jumbo frames. >> Thirded. :-) Same thing here, even with generic Intel 1 GB Ethernet cards. >> >> *** >> Gilbert Sebenste >> (My opinions only!) ** >> *** >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > Thanks. Looks good. > > I just looked around - looks like manufacturers tend not to list the > chipset in their NIC specifications (like here, for instance: > http://www.trendnet.com/products/proddetail.asp?prod=140_TEG-PCITXR&cat=14 > ) > > Is there a list somewhere out there listing what card features what chipset? > > It definitely looks like it is best to just stick to the better > chipsets - might be a little more expensive but definitely worth the > money. > > Thanks. > > Boris. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos trendnet is realtek. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On 12/1/2010 2:12 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello listmates, > > As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with > Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details: > > http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224 > > So now my question is, what PCI 1 Gbit/s Ethernet adapters should I > use under CentOS? If you have had a consistent positive experience > with any particular chipset/brand please speak up. > > Thanks. > > Boris. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Intel. No need to mess with any Winnic(which is what most are). Broadcom is another good one. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] awk help
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 08:19:51AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > It does not. I don't know why the OP is even trying to do it this way. My guess: school work. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On 12/01/2010 06:07 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 12/01/2010 11:17 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote: >>> >>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there >>> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an >>> internal design glitch. >> >> Specifically the 82573 chipsets, which are still fairly common on >> motherboards. > > That's good, but I am looking for expansion card NICs. I may not have been clear. The Intel 82573 chipsets are faulty, and should be avoided. I've mostly seen them on motherboards, but I have no reason to believe you won't find them on expansion cards. Avoid them. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 12/01/2010 11:17 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote: >> >> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there >> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an >> internal design glitch. > > Specifically the 82573 chipsets, which are still fairly common on > motherboards. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > That's good, but I am looking for expansion card NICs. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On 12/01/2010 11:17 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote: > > Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there > are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an > internal design glitch. Specifically the 82573 chipsets, which are still fairly common on motherboards. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] awk help
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 07:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/1/2010 5:44 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Christopher
>> Chan wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, December 02, 2010 05:09 AM, ann kok wrote:
Hi all
Anyone can help to let me know how to
ls -1 | lsattr
>>>
>>> lsattr `ls -1`
>>>
ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $2}' | lsattr
>>>
>>>
>>> for i in `ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $8}'`; do lsattr /folder/$i; done
>>
>> You can probably do that last one as a pipe to xargs instead of a shell loop.
>
> I'm missing something here. Why does lsattr need help from ls?
>
It does not. I don't know why the OP is even trying to do it this way.
Just thought I'd demonstrate some bash stuff. :-p
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Thanks. Looks good. > > I just looked around - looks like manufacturers tend not to list the > chipset in their NIC specifications (like here, for instance: > http://www.trendnet.com/products/proddetail.asp?prod=140_TEG-PCITXR&cat=14 > ) In fact, they lie. All sorts of add-on cards from various vendors, with the same card "type" and model number, have different chipsets. This has caused me endless grief in environments where my employer refused to do normal kernel updates, and the new chipsets were only compatible with the newer kernel. > Is there a list somewhere out there listing what card features what chipset? > > It definitely looks like it is best to just stick to the better > chipsets - might be a little more expensive but definitely worth the > money. See above, and yes. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 07:50 AM, Ross Walker wrote: > On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Christopher > Chan wrote: > >> On Thursday, December 02, 2010 03:28 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: >>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote: >>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an internal design glitch. >>> >>> Seconded. I have a load of Intel 82576 and 82571EB's, and there have been >>> no issues at all, including with Jumbo frames. >>> >> >> Please take note that some Intel 1G nics do not have jumbo frame support >> at all. So you won't have issues with jumbo frames either way. The >> question is whether there is jumbo frame support. > >> From my memory those that don't do jumbo were "desktop" versions of the >> chipset. > > I believe all current manufactured models support jumbo frames. > The Desktop GT series certainly does not have jumbo frames. Not sure about others. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ipsec vpn client; openswan?
Hi all, Any one have success with Openswan and IPSEC VPN? Having some issues. Wondering if any would mind posting there configs; ipsec.conf. Also open to any IPSEC client. - aurf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] x86_64 and Thunderbird Trash folder.
> > Um, do you ever log out, or close firefox? For that matter, do you have it > set to empty trash when done? Or do you ever manually compress > folders/empty trash? > > mark "or just leave it running for a year at a time?" > > NO - your correct I dont log out it's got messages in there from way back. I'd like to keep them for history. I thought on a 64bit machine there were no 4G limits. Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] awk help
On 12/1/2010 5:44 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Christopher
> Chan wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, December 02, 2010 05:09 AM, ann kok wrote:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> Anyone can help to let me know how to
>>>
>>> ls -1 | lsattr
>>
>> lsattr `ls -1`
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $2}' | lsattr
>>>
>>
>>
>> for i in `ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $8}'`; do lsattr /folder/$i; done
>
> You can probably do that last one as a pipe to xargs instead of a shell loop.
I'm missing something here. Why does lsattr need help from ls?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: > On Thursday, December 02, 2010 03:28 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote: >> >>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there >>> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an >>> internal design glitch. >> >> Seconded. I have a load of Intel 82576 and 82571EB's, and there have been >> no issues at all, including with Jumbo frames. >> > > Please take note that some Intel 1G nics do not have jumbo frame support > at all. So you won't have issues with jumbo frames either way. The > question is whether there is jumbo frame support. >From my memory those that don't do jumbo were "desktop" versions of the >chipset. I believe all current manufactured models support jumbo frames. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] awk help
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Christopher Chan
wrote:
> On Thursday, December 02, 2010 05:09 AM, ann kok wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> Anyone can help to let me know how to
>>
>> ls -1 | lsattr
>
> lsattr `ls -1`
>
>>
>>
>> ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $2}' | lsattr
>>
>
>
> for i in `ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $8}'`; do lsattr /folder/$i; done
You can probably do that last one as a pipe to xargs instead of a shell loop.
-Ross
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
On Dec 1, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Scot P. Floess wrote: >> Well - really isn't it all in what tool makes the most sense for the job >> at hand? If one doesn't need the latest and greatest - CentOS as a >> desktop is super stable... >> >> Don't get me wrong, I like Fedora...but still :) >> >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Alan Hodgson wrote: >> >> >>> On December 1, 2010, "Scot P. Floess" wrote: >>> I think when CentOS 6 is released, that may not be even close to true :) I'm running RHEL 6 @ work as my desktop - it has a fairly decent version of KDE (4.3 specifically) - and this is on a laptop -> its great ;) >>> Until a year from now. When it is again well behind faster moving desktop >>> distros. >>> >>> >>> > ok > I have tried.. > suse 11.3 very nice > ubuntu 10.10 ok > fedora 14 very nice > debian squeeze very very nice > centos 5.5 i386 love it > Want to try x86_64.. laptop is capable will see Run x86_64 as my workstation at work and everything works as advertised, though I use 32-bit firefox for max plugin compatibility. Don't need 64-bit address space for web browsing, if a page doesn't fit in under 3GB of memory (ahem... Cisco, 1000 page web page? Really? Ever heard of a TOC?), then it ain't worth browsing to. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Christopher Chan wrote: > On Thursday, December 02, 2010 03:28 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote: >> >>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there >>> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an >>> internal design glitch. >> >> Seconded. I have a load of Intel 82576 and 82571EB's, and there have been >> no issues at all, including with Jumbo frames. > > Please take note that some Intel 1G nics do not have jumbo frame support > at all. So you won't have issues with jumbo frames either way. The > question is whether there is jumbo frame support. The Intel NICs that I mentioned, 82576 and 82571EB, are both in use in DRBD replication links with an MTU of 9000. We usually configure each such link as a point-to-point bonding pair (balance-rr), and get 1.95 Gb/s throughput with iperf, and about 165 MB/sec with drbd (but of course the latter is disk dependent). CentOS 5.5, x86_64, Dell PE2900 servers. Solid. Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] x86_64 and Thunderbird Trash folder.
Jerry Geis wrote: > I just ran into something odd, > I have x86_64 5.5 running with Thunderbird. > > I am getting a message about can delete the email as Trash is FULL. > > The file size is 4G. Whats up with that Um, do you ever log out, or close firefox? For that matter, do you have it set to empty trash when done? Or do you ever manually compress folders/empty trash? mark "or just leave it running for a year at a time?" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 03:28 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote: > >> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there >> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an >> internal design glitch. > > Seconded. I have a load of Intel 82576 and 82571EB's, and there have been > no issues at all, including with Jumbo frames. > Please take note that some Intel 1G nics do not have jumbo frame support at all. So you won't have issues with jumbo frames either way. The question is whether there is jumbo frame support. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] awk help
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 05:09 AM, ann kok wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Anyone can help to let me know how to
>
> ls -1 | lsattr
lsattr `ls -1`
>
>
> ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $2}' | lsattr
>
for i in `ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $8}'`; do lsattr /folder/$i; done
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
Scot P. Floess wrote: > Well - really isn't it all in what tool makes the most sense for the job > at hand? If one doesn't need the latest and greatest - CentOS as a > desktop is super stable... > > Don't get me wrong, I like Fedora...but still :) > > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Alan Hodgson wrote: > > >> On December 1, 2010, "Scot P. Floess" wrote: >> >>> I think when CentOS 6 is released, that may not be even close to true :) >>> I'm running RHEL 6 @ work as my desktop - it has a fairly decent version >>> of KDE (4.3 specifically) - and this is on a laptop -> its great ;) >>> >>> >> Until a year from now. When it is again well behind faster moving desktop >> distros. >> >> >> ok I have tried.. suse 11.3 very nice ubuntu 10.10 ok fedora 14 very nice debian squeeze very very nice centos 5.5 i386 love it Want to try x86_64.. laptop is capable will see Enjoy Johan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] x86_64 and Thunderbird Trash folder.
I just ran into something odd, I have x86_64 5.5 running with Thunderbird. I am getting a message about can delete the email as Trash is FULL. The file size is 4G. Whats up with that I have the 64 bit executable running. file /usr/lib64/thunderbird-2.0.0.24/thunderbird-bin /usr/lib64/thunderbird-2.0.0.24/thunderbird-bin: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, stripped jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
Well - really isn't it all in what tool makes the most sense for the job at hand? If one doesn't need the latest and greatest - CentOS as a desktop is super stable... Don't get me wrong, I like Fedora...but still :) On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Alan Hodgson wrote: > On December 1, 2010, "Scot P. Floess" wrote: >> I think when CentOS 6 is released, that may not be even close to true :) >> I'm running RHEL 6 @ work as my desktop - it has a fairly decent version >> of KDE (4.3 specifically) - and this is on a laptop -> its great ;) >> > > Until a year from now. When it is again well behind faster moving desktop > distros. > > -- Scot P. Floess RHCT (Certificate Number 605010084735240) Chief Architect FlossWare http://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware http://flossware.sourceforge.net https://github.com/organizations/FlossWare Chief Architect JPlate http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate Chief Architect JavaPIMhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim Chief Architect Keros http://sourceforge.net/projects/keros ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] awk help
Hi all
Anyone can help to let me know how to
ls -1 | lsattr
ls -al /folder | awk '{ print $2}' | lsattr
Thank you
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
On December 1, 2010, "Scot P. Floess" wrote: > I think when CentOS 6 is released, that may not be even close to true :) > I'm running RHEL 6 @ work as my desktop - it has a fairly decent version > of KDE (4.3 specifically) - and this is on a laptop -> its great ;) > Until a year from now. When it is again well behind faster moving desktop distros. -- A hybrid Escalade is missing the point much in the same way that having a diet soda with your extra large pepperoni pizza is missing the point. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
>> Is there a list somewhere out there listing what card features what >> chipset? >> >> It definitely looks like it is best to just stick to the better >> chipsets - might be a little more expensive but definitely worth the >> money. > > You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the > whole life. Amen ! As for the nics, Intel, Intel, nothing but intel. Since a couple of year, I put nothing but intel nics in our servers. Most of them are on-board 8257*, like 82575EB in our mos recent batch of server. Other add-on card are pro1000 with chipset 82541PI. Regards, ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
Johan Scheepers wrote: > Good day, > > Been googling about this matter. > Afraid I am now confused. > Too many options..: for/against/whatever. > Some is years ago. > > Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to enable mp3 > please. > Thanks > Johan > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > To all the people out there that responded..Thank you. I know you want to help. All those links .. Error 404 and some not found etc. It is true as someone said "its a jungle out there." Me..if it is not an rpm .. then I am out in the bush. Thanks again Regards Johan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:32:40PM -0500, Scot P. Floess wrote: > > For my VMs I definitely use CentOS for anything graphical - like a > desktop... Of course, my bare metal box @ home is running F14... Which just shows how flexible, in many ways, it is. I'm the exact opposite, though my workstation at work has Fedora. > > I think when CentOS 6 is released, that may not be even close to true :) > I'm running RHEL 6 @ work as my desktop - it has a fairly decent version Yeahy, we're all waiting for that. Although, practically speaking, there's only about two programs I haven't been able to get working to my satisfaction on my home desktop-cum-server. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] fsck - and there was much rejoicing
Lamar Owen wrote: > On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 02:01:35 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this >> morning, >> and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* >> of >> files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and is running at >> reasonable speed. > > Hey, let us know how long that 1.4T fsck takes if you don't mind. Sure - I think it was an hour, or an hour and a quarter, but I may be misremembering - it could have been before lunch, which would make it about 2.25 hrs. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On 12/01/2010 08:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste > wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote: >>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an internal design glitch. >>> >>> Seconded. I have a load of Intel 82576 and 82571EB's, and there have been >>> no issues at all, including with Jumbo frames. >> >> Thirded. :-) Same thing here, even with generic Intel 1 GB Ethernet cards. >> >> *** >> Gilbert Sebenste >> (My opinions only!) ** >> *** >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > > Thanks. Looks good. > > I just looked around - looks like manufacturers tend not to list the > chipset in their NIC specifications (like here, for instance: > http://www.trendnet.com/products/proddetail.asp?prod=140_TEG-PCITXR&cat=14 > ) > > Is there a list somewhere out there listing what card features what chipset? > > It definitely looks like it is best to just stick to the better > chipsets - might be a little more expensive but definitely worth the > money. You get what you pay for -- this is a valid rule of thumb throughout the whole life. > Thanks. > > Boris. Timo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello listmates, > > As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with > Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details: > > http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224 > > So now my question is, what PCI 1 Gbit/s Ethernet adapters should I > use under CentOS? If you have had a consistent positive experience > with any particular chipset/brand please speak up. > I *think* most of our servers have Broadcoms. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote: > >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote: >> >>> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there >>> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an >>> internal design glitch. >> >> Seconded. I have a load of Intel 82576 and 82571EB's, and there have been >> no issues at all, including with Jumbo frames. > > Thirded. :-) Same thing here, even with generic Intel 1 GB Ethernet cards. > > *** > Gilbert Sebenste > (My opinions only!) ** > *** > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Thanks. Looks good. I just looked around - looks like manufacturers tend not to list the chipset in their NIC specifications (like here, for instance: http://www.trendnet.com/products/proddetail.asp?prod=140_TEG-PCITXR&cat=14 ) Is there a list somewhere out there listing what card features what chipset? It definitely looks like it is best to just stick to the better chipsets - might be a little more expensive but definitely worth the money. Thanks. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote: > >> Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there >> are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an >> internal design glitch. > > Seconded. I have a load of Intel 82576 and 82571EB's, and there have been > no issues at all, including with Jumbo frames. Thirded. :-) Same thing here, even with generic Intel 1 GB Ethernet cards. *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote: > Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there > are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an > internal design glitch. Seconded. I have a load of Intel 82576 and 82571EB's, and there have been no issues at all, including with Jumbo frames. Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] fsck - and there was much rejoicing
On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 02:01:35 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this morning, > and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* of > files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and is running at > reasonable speed. Hey, let us know how long that 1.4T fsck takes if you don't mind. Longwinded e2fsck's are a bane on reboot times on critical VM's, and I have a number of VM's with 2TB ext3 filesystems, some of which haven't had an fsck in. well, too long. And I'll echo the kudos to the intrepid bug-fixers. Long and interminable e2fsck's have been with us a long time. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
On 12/01/2010 08:12 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello listmates, > > As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with > Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details: > > http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224 > > So now my question is, what PCI 1 Gbit/s Ethernet adapters should I > use under CentOS? If you have had a consistent positive experience > with any particular chipset/brand please speak up. Well, Realcrap is known to be crap everywhere. Ask the OpenBSD guys. ;) Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there are some Intel NICs that are *not* able to handle Jumbo Frames due to an internal design glitch. HTH, Timo > Thanks. > > Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:04:58 am Johan Scheepers wrote: > Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to enable mp3 > please. The Fluendo MP3 decode plugin for gstreamer is no-cost, and is fully licensed for MP3 playback. It should work for any gstreamer-enabled player. It's license is non-free, so if that's a problem. Since most of my CentOS boxes are servers, and those CentOS workstations I do have don't have or use sound, I haven't tested the Fluendo MP3 plugin on CentOS, but the RPM installs fine on a box here. I purchased and use the Fluendo codec pack here, since even though I'm the one responsible for the licensing and patent compliance audits, fudging the rules just seems wrong for me, and comes across as hypocritical when I catch someone else fudging on licensing of software. Same with DVD playback; the Fluendo player, while spartan, is fully legal to use watching encrypted DVD content on Linux. While the MP3 playback plugin is no cost, the full codec pack and the DVD player do have a price, much like the same things on Windows, although I sure wish I could convert all those PowerDVD licenses I got with DVD drives from Windows to Linux for no cost, but, oh well. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] 1 Gbit/s Ethernet NIC under CentOS
Hello listmates, As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224 So now my question is, what PCI 1 Gbit/s Ethernet adapters should I use under CentOS? If you have had a consistent positive experience with any particular chipset/brand please speak up. Thanks. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] fsck - and there was much rejoicing
Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this morning, and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* of files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and is running at reasonable speed. Thanks to the folks who got this one. I *really* needed to do this, esp. to our backup drives. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
If you use the rpmforge repo you can also get VLC too and between Mplayer and VLC I have not found an audio format they wont play. On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:15:30 -0500 "Brunner, Brian T." wrote: > > http://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/news.html > > Step-by-step mp3 play > > http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/dag/packages/xmms/ > > Also works > > You may try > rpm -Uhv > http://apt.sw.be/packages/rpmforge-release/rpmforge-release-0.3.6-1.el5. > rf.i386.rpm > Then > yum install xmms xmms-skins xmms-mp3 > yum install gstreamer-plugins-bad > yum install gstreamer-plugins-ugly > > Another path to the answer > ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/rpm.livna.org/fedora/6/i386/audacious-plugins > -nonfree-mp3-1.3.2-1.lvn6.i386.rpm > ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/www-ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/mirror/fed > ora/linux/extras/6/i386/audacious-plugins-1.3.3-1.fc6.i386.rpm > ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/www-ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/mirror/fed > ora/linux/extras/6/i386/audacious-1.3.2-1.fc6.i386.rpm > ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/e > xtras/6/i386/audacious-libs-1.3.2-1.fc6.i386.rpm > > I'm sorry you asked a question to which there are MANY correct > answers. Here at work I'm stuck with a windows box and a sounless > centos box; at home my centos box just plays what I tell it to so I > have no recollection of exactly what I did (besides install and > upgrade all) to get as happy as I am. > > > -Original Message- > > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Johan Scheepers > > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:05 AM > > To: centos > > Subject: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3 > > > > Good day, > > > > Been googling about this matter. > > Afraid I am now confused. > > Too many options..: for/against/whatever. > > Some is years ago. > > > > Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to > > enable mp3 please. > > Thanks > > Johan > > > > ___ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > *** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom > they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please > notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this > email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. > www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated** > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
cybernet wrote: > centOS 5.5 is for servers not for desktops, please get use to that > use another distribution like ... a very popular one for desktops > Why? We use it a lot, here where I work, and I use it at home - a) I like real stability, and b) I don't want to have to think about the differences between the machine I use all day at work, and what I need to do on my system at home. And mplayer works just fine at both. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
For my VMs I definitely use CentOS for anything graphical - like a desktop... Of course, my bare metal box @ home is running F14... I think when CentOS 6 is released, that may not be even close to true :) I'm running RHEL 6 @ work as my desktop - it has a fairly decent version of KDE (4.3 specifically) - and this is on a laptop -> its great ;) On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >>> centOS 5.5 is for servers not for desktops, > > Says who? Says where? > > I think the majority of the posters here use Centos as their desktop for > reading and posting in this list. > -- Scot P. Floess RHCT (Certificate Number 605010084735240) Chief Architect FlossWare http://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware http://flossware.sourceforge.net https://github.com/organizations/FlossWare Chief Architect JPlate http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate Chief Architect JavaPIMhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim Chief Architect Keros http://sourceforge.net/projects/keros ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of cybernet >> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:20 PM >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3 >> centOS 5.5 is for servers not for desktops, Says who? Says where? I think the majority of the posters here use Centos as their desktop for reading and posting in this list. *** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
On 12/01/2010 07:19 PM, cybernet wrote: > centOS 5.5 is for servers not for desktops, please get use to that > use another distribution like ... a very popular one for desktops Sorry, but this is nonsense. I myself run CentOS on my workstation at the office (heaviest duty network admin, I wouldn't want any other Linux distro running there) as well as at home. Ah, yes, and I even watch videos there. And use Flash(tm)! ;) Cheers... > > *From:* Johan Scheepers > *To:* centos > *Sent:* Wed, December 1, 2010 5:04:58 PM > *Subject:* [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3 > > Good day, > > Been googling about this matter. > Afraid I am now confused. > Too many options..: for/against/whatever. > Some is years ago. > > Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to enable mp3 > please. > Thanks > Johan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
centOS 5.5 is for servers not for desktops, please get use to that use another distribution like ... a very popular one for desktops From: Johan Scheepers To: centos Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 5:04:58 PM Subject: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3 Good day, Been googling about this matter. Afraid I am now confused. Too many options..: for/against/whatever. Some is years ago. Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to enable mp3 please. Thanks Johan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/01/2010 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > On this thread, I'm speaking with my manager, and the other admin comes > in, ranting about selinux, and that he's going to file a bug against it > with RH Seems he installed RHEL6, and had the misfortune of having an > older Sun keyboard, and may have hit the key when entering the > root password... and he couldn't log in. So he rebooted to single user > mode, and ran passwd... which sat there for a while, then quit, with no > messages. Then he turned off selinux, and passwd worked... so the whole > selinux thing was a pointless and irritating exercise. > > Of course, if selinux had stopped him from turning enforcing off, he'd > have had to reboot from the rescue disk, at the least, and reinstall at > the worst. > > The bigger question is why selinux when the system is in single user mode, > and offline. If someone has console access, and shouldn't have, you have > management problems, not o/s security problems. > > mark > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos This was a bug that has been fixed or will be fixed in the next release. Preview available in http://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL6/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkz2kDgACgkQrlYvE4MpobM4UwCg4tP5dDTysKAMSa5q+eXyWTbq W3UAoOlBoR0Bhlvbz2ZowrXEKlqSK3vX =TyCv -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to separate individual logs?
On 12/1/2010 11:14 AM, John Doe wrote: > From: hadi motamedi > >> On 12/1/10, John Doe wrote: >>> Ok, last try... >>> Did you copy/pasted my code? >>> Did you type it? >>> Saying just that there's a syntax error without showing the code you used >>> does >>> not help... >> Please find below the code that I tried : >> cat Edit3 | tr -d "\r" | while read LINE; do >> echo "$LINE" | grep -q '>\.\.' >> if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then >> LOGFILE=`echo $LINE | cut -d' ' -f1`.log >> else >> echo "$LINE">> $LOGFILE >> fi >> done >> Please do me favor and correct me on my mistakes. > > I copy/pasted the code above and it works fine... > If I indent it like mine, they are identical. > Check that ftp does not add control chars. > You run it with bash, right? > Ask your sysadmin/colegue to help you. If the first line of the input file used doesn't match the pattern you'd probably get an error in the redirect since $LOGFILE would not be set. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any news on an updated php 5.2 version in extras/testing?
Thanks. I'll do it later tonight. On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 12/01/2010 11:54 AM, robert mena wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've being using the 5.2.10 that is in testing in a production > > environment for more than six months without any problem. I am > > wondering if/when we are going to see a 5.2.14 version there and if the > > recently disclosure of a 5.1.6 security update affects the 5.2.10 that > > is in testing. > > If you file an issue request at bugs.centos.org; i'll investigate > > - KB > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to separate individual logs?
From: hadi motamedi > On 12/1/10, John Doe wrote: > > Ok, last try... > > Did you copy/pasted my code? > > Did you type it? > > Saying just that there's a syntax error without showing the code you used > > does > > not help... > Please find below the code that I tried : > cat Edit3 | tr -d "\r" | while read LINE; do > echo "$LINE" | grep -q '>\.\.' > if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then > LOGFILE=`echo $LINE | cut -d' ' -f1`.log > else > echo "$LINE" >> $LOGFILE > fi > done > Please do me favor and correct me on my mistakes. I copy/pasted the code above and it works fine... If I indent it like mine, they are identical. Check that ftp does not add control chars. You run it with bash, right? Ask your sysadmin/colegue to help you. JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 70, Issue 1
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2010:0919 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 php Update
(Karanbir Singh)
2. CESA-2010:0919 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 php Update (Karanbir Singh)
3. CEBA-2010:0916 CentOS 5 i386 sox Update (Karanbir Singh)
4. CEBA-2010:0916 CentOS 5 x86_64 sox Update (Karanbir Singh)
5. CEBA-2010:0914 CentOS 5 i386 openldap Update (Karanbir Singh)
6. CEBA-2010:0914 CentOS 5 x86_64 openldap Update (Karanbir Singh)
7. CESA-2010:0926 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 krb5 Update (Karanbir Singh)
8. CESA-2010:0926 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 krb5 Update
(Karanbir Singh)
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:21:15 +
From: Karanbir Singh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0919 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 php
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20101130122115.ga32...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0919 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0919.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
bd94919f4e7d719ea6d6ffc09ad08363 php-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
815e3b4b1bb1b9c91b18fbd3b3976031 php-bcmath-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
801854cece78bacac8c2e357a492b959 php-cli-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
80ef6bf2662be7aa3640b5ec9a11d93f php-common-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
58ae385a4c27d6f3fdb94b4c264efbb7 php-dba-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
a4046211569cb81b667c7faec16f0020 php-devel-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
8f2eaaa46cbcddcfbddb5cc9cb0245c2 php-gd-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
abd65b47bb6433701ce2d7c26c988b2c php-imap-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
f6247642ed89fa1d84048e383f321733 php-ldap-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
955b93968969cd39a4c337e29993b94e php-mbstring-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
7f5a39ea586631b9ae7236a11a688d3a php-mysql-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
bfb0f5a77bfd40c698fe994c084df24e php-ncurses-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
bdb718d4f8f09e1b8a53bf042608b608 php-odbc-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
198301d2bdef3bf8644a5349062f46ec php-pdo-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
fc9f16c941ca256bf6a116419c3cadc7 php-pgsql-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
2e1c23d9679bb0bf5333673af74af0aa php-snmp-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
8b2be33b42905f194dbbd6137c60d64b php-soap-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
3f56d9ab23a6e03f6b6fd8e893ffe421 php-xml-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
8ed1549778bf55f623f1670ab4682b0d php-xmlrpc-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
3c2b12751a0c7058e50f24a100016f3b php-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:21:14 +
From: Karanbir Singh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0919 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 php
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20101130122114.ga32...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0919 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0919.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
e90a553ce2b477655ade6857cb92ff8b php-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
998fe7e8cadf6962db48d542ef85bec6 php-bcmath-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
f78405ab3e7c893fd45f82550943a580 php-cli-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
d523c55175f320b7c9c98dd40b848ea3 php-common-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
1b558ba03bbc1ba228dbedd03bb79c51 php-dba-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
cc702d8a16eb6387272bdfe24ea5e1b3 php-devel-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
dcc71667e0e1b4d51f3a51efba8f6233 php-gd-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
eae1d7cb874a6d5ecc3933eeb2eed23a php-imap-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
ec9738bb31fc11f68b4ab405664c3ac8 php-ldap-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
b5af750e59edb907fa7474d3b741bef9 php-mbstring-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
f88f5f2b4d80a6c5be4490133536b695 php-mysql-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
e8ee618a6cccd9be0c26fd9bf1acbf5f php-ncurses-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
f4578e41664391dd89c2317656fb7416 php-odbc-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
02694764673bd9a0da4fc48e50f071f8 php-pdo-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
b6b1cbc6eea7bb8284b896053464d98e php-pgsql-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
81732ae086514f3eb9235a7135b05de4 php-snmp-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
003765ac355726cca0685760ef2a0127 php-soap-5.1.6-27.el5_5.3.i386.rpm
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
Johan Scheepers wrote: > Good day, > > Been googling about this matter. > Afraid I am now confused. > Too many options..: for/against/whatever. > Some is years ago. > > Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to enable mp3 > please. Install mplayer. There are a number of front-ends to it, as well. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
On this thread, I'm speaking with my manager, and the other admin comes in, ranting about selinux, and that he's going to file a bug against it with RH Seems he installed RHEL6, and had the misfortune of having an older Sun keyboard, and may have hit the key when entering the root password... and he couldn't log in. So he rebooted to single user mode, and ran passwd... which sat there for a while, then quit, with no messages. Then he turned off selinux, and passwd worked... so the whole selinux thing was a pointless and irritating exercise. Of course, if selinux had stopped him from turning enforcing off, he'd have had to reboot from the rescue disk, at the least, and reinstall at the worst. The bigger question is why selinux when the system is in single user mode, and offline. If someone has console access, and shouldn't have, you have management problems, not o/s security problems. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/news.html Step-by-step mp3 play http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/dag/packages/xmms/ Also works You may try rpm -Uhv http://apt.sw.be/packages/rpmforge-release/rpmforge-release-0.3.6-1.el5. rf.i386.rpm Then yum install xmms xmms-skins xmms-mp3 yum install gstreamer-plugins-bad yum install gstreamer-plugins-ugly Another path to the answer ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/rpm.livna.org/fedora/6/i386/audacious-plugins -nonfree-mp3-1.3.2-1.lvn6.i386.rpm ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/www-ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/mirror/fed ora/linux/extras/6/i386/audacious-plugins-1.3.3-1.fc6.i386.rpm ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/www-ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/mirror/fed ora/linux/extras/6/i386/audacious-1.3.2-1.fc6.i386.rpm ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/e xtras/6/i386/audacious-libs-1.3.2-1.fc6.i386.rpm I'm sorry you asked a question to which there are MANY correct answers. Here at work I'm stuck with a windows box and a sounless centos box; at home my centos box just plays what I tell it to so I have no recollection of exactly what I did (besides install and upgrade all) to get as happy as I am. > -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Johan Scheepers > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:05 AM > To: centos > Subject: [CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3 > > Good day, > > Been googling about this matter. > Afraid I am now confused. > Too many options..: for/against/whatever. > Some is years ago. > > Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to > enable mp3 please. > Thanks > Johan > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > *** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] centos 5.5 - using mp3
Good day, Been googling about this matter. Afraid I am now confused. Too many options..: for/against/whatever. Some is years ago. Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to enable mp3 please. Thanks Johan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rsyslog as default syslog daemon?
James Pearson wrote: > > I think your problem is that you did 'chkconfig --del syslog' - as the > man page states: > > --del name > The service is removed from chkconfig management, and any sym- > bolic links in /etc/rc[0-6].d which pertain to it are removed. > > Note that future package installs for this service may run chk- > config --add, which will re-add such links. To disable a ser- > vice, run chkconfig name off. > > I believe you should have done 'chkconfig syslog off' instead. > > We use rsyslog instead of sysklogd and don't get this problem. Thank you James, you are right, 'chkconfig syslog off; chkconfig rsyslog on' solved this problem. Andrej ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any news on an updated php 5.2 version in extras/testing?
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:50 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > All these vulnerabilities except for the last one > (https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2010-3870.html / > http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=49687) are fixed in PHP-5.2.14. For this > one issue you might need to use the patch from the latest upstream SRPM. http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_2/ext/xml/xml.c?r1=293146&r2=305055 is the fix for the 5.2 branch which is not yet in the released 5.2.14. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tmpfs says "No space left on device"
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Adam Tauno Williams > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:14 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] tmpfs says "No space left on device" > > I have a server where we use tmpfs as a cache for temporary > files used by a web application. But occasionally this tmpfs > thinks it is full when it isn't. > > [r...@flask-yellow tmpfs]# touch file > touch: cannot touch `file': No space left on device > [r...@flask-yellow tmpfs]# df -k > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > none393216 19296373920 5% /srv/tmpfs What does lsof show regarding file open on this device? I'm thinking files opened, then unlinked, but file descriptors not yet closed. *** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tmpfs says "No space left on device"
On 1 December 2010 14:13, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > I have a server where we use tmpfs as a cache for temporary files used > by a web application. But occasionally this tmpfs thinks it is full > when it isn't. > > [r...@flask-yellow tmpfs]# touch file > touch: cannot touch `file': No space left on device > [r...@flask-yellow tmpfs]# df -k > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > none 393216 19296 373920 5% /srv/tmpfs > > Simply unmounting and remounting /srv/tmpfs resolves the issue. > > 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 > > Any suggestions as to the cause of this or workarounds are appreciated. > Webserver process holding the file handles open so that the space doesn't get released maybe? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] tmpfs says "No space left on device"
I have a server where we use tmpfs as a cache for temporary files used by a web application. But occasionally this tmpfs thinks it is full when it isn't. [r...@flask-yellow tmpfs]# touch file touch: cannot touch `file': No space left on device [r...@flask-yellow tmpfs]# df -k Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on none393216 19296373920 5% /srv/tmpfs Simply unmounting and remounting /srv/tmpfs resolves the issue. 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 Any suggestions as to the cause of this or workarounds are appreciated. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Guide to SELinux
This is wonderful! Thank you very much! Rob On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2010/12/1 Rob Del Vecchio : > > Since the "SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!" thread is > deep > > in heated discussion, I decided not to derail to ask a simple question. > > I found this guide for > > SELinux: http://www.linux-books.us/centos_0005.php and it looks like > it's > > straight out of RedHat. > > However, it's dated 2005. Will this be sufficient to help understand a > > CentOS 5 - or 6 - installation of SELinux? > > Is there a more recent guide (freely) available out there? > > See docs.redhat.com @ > > http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Security-Enhanced_Linux/index.html > > -- > Eero > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
2010/12/1 Nico Kadel-Garcia : >> Anyone willing to contribute funds (or time) to such a study? It would be >> educational experience and good PR, at the least. > > Oh, I know the holes and which would be straightforward to get to. > There's generally enough lower hanging fruit with NFS stored > passwords, email with passwords, and poorly managed elevation via SSH > keys as policies before I even got there that this protection is like > putting a bike lock on a jello mold. How about production like server: - firewall installed - selinux disabled - all services except ssh and httpd disabled -> sshd login enabled only with ssh keys and httpd protected via mod_security ? - cis hardened fixes applied to os - latest kernel patched applied -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any news on an updated php 5.2 version in extras/testing?
Dne 1.12.2010 13:17, Karanbir Singh napsal(a): > If you file an issue request at bugs.centos.org; i'll investigate > > - KB I'd say the bigger issue is 5.1.6 C4Plus php, which is not maintained together with C4Plus pecl/pear modules. C4Plus php is installed on many boxes over the world. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any news on an updated php 5.2 version in extras/testing?
Hi, On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 07:54 -0400, robert mena wrote: > I am wondering if/when we are going to see a 5.2.14 version there and > if the recently disclosure of a 5.1.6 security update affects the > 5.2.10 that is in testing. Red Hat just put out this security alert concerning multiple PHP vulnerabilities, which is probably what you are speaking off: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0919.html All these vulnerabilities except for the last one (https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2010-3870.html / http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=49687) are fixed in PHP-5.2.14. For this one issue you might need to use the patch from the latest upstream SRPM. Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote: I would guess no one knows. But all of my CentOS installs are OOB as concerning SELinux, except the two scalix installs, which have some custom 'stuff' thanks to the scalix instance naming. >>> >>> All I know is at the last two companies I worked at - AT&T, a small team >>> building software for the NOC, a smaller root CA, and here at the federal >>> agency I'm at, we either turned it off, or have it set to permissive. >> >> I disabled it on the last 1000 hosts *I* installed > > > Hmmm... it would be interesting take some Centos systems with production > like deployments (say 3 with SELinux and 3 without) and ask a professional > pen-tester to try to get into them. > > Anyone willing to contribute funds (or time) to such a study? It would be > educational experience and good PR, at the least. Oh, I know the holes and which would be straightforward to get to. There's generally enough lower hanging fruit with NFS stored passwords, email with passwords, and poorly managed elevation via SSH keys as policies before I even got there that this protection is like putting a bike lock on a jello mold. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any news on an updated php 5.2 version in extras/testing?
On 12/01/2010 11:54 AM, robert mena wrote: > Hi, > > I've being using the 5.2.10 that is in testing in a production > environment for more than six months without any problem. I am > wondering if/when we are going to see a 5.2.14 version there and if the > recently disclosure of a 5.1.6 security update affects the 5.2.10 that > is in testing. If you file an issue request at bugs.centos.org; i'll investigate - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Any news on an updated php 5.2 version in extras/testing?
Hi, I've being using the 5.2.10 that is in testing in a production environment for more than six months without any problem. I am wondering if/when we are going to see a 5.2.14 version there and if the recently disclosure of a 5.1.6 security update affects the 5.2.10 that is in testing. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to separate individual logs?
On 12/1/10, John Doe wrote: > > Ok, last try... > Did you copy/pasted my code? > Did you type it? > Saying just that there's a syntax error without showing the code you used > does > not help... > > JD > > Sorry to forget to mention that I have copied your code from your message into a text file and then ftp it to my centos 5.2 server and make it executable by 'chmod +x' ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to separate individual logs?
On 12/1/10, John Doe wrote: > > Ok, last try... > Did you copy/pasted my code? > Did you type it? > Saying just that there's a syntax error without showing the code you used > does > not help... > > JD > Please find below the code that I tried : cat Edit3 | tr -d "\r" | while read LINE; do echo "$LINE" | grep -q '>\.\.' if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then LOGFILE=`echo $LINE | cut -d' ' -f1`.log else echo "$LINE" >> $LOGFILE fi done Please do me favor and correct me on my mistakes. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to separate individual logs?
From: hadi motamedi >I even tried to make it as an script file and made it executable > but still getting the following error: > 'syntax error near unexpected token 'done' Ok, last try... Did you copy/pasted my code? Did you type it? Saying just that there's a syntax error without showing the code you used does not help... JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Converting to Raid1
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, John Kennedy wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:59, Matt wrote: >> Have a CentOS 4.x 32 bit server running on a single 500M SATA drive. >> What is easiest way to convert too RAID 1 on it? Anyone have a link? >> Would be open to hardware or software just do not want to reinstall >> the entire mess. > Why would you mirror a single disk? You need to get another 500Gb hard drive > to mirror with. +1 > Once you get the second drive, you need to make sure LVM is installed. Not really. You can choose not to use LVM. > I think you then need to add your partitions as physical drives and partition > the new drive to match your existing one. I don't understand the above. Basically both disks have to be partitioned in the same way and, assuming that sda is the current disk and sdb is the new disk, you can do so with "sfdisk -d /dev/sda | sfdisk /dev/sdb". ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Minimising disk I/O
Hi Keith, Looks like the Swapping will happen once the PC memory is exhausted 1) So your point of placing SWAP place in another spare disk is a good decision but we still have the Paging happening which cant be avoided :) 2) Again moving the /var/log is another good part but there are some locations under /var/ for eg /var/run which creates PID , so why not moving /var/ to your spare instead of just moving /var/log Just thoughts Thanks Philix On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Keith Roberts wrote: > I've added a second IDE card to my system on the PCI bus, > and added a small HDD on the Primary Master port for that > IDE card. > > This drive shows up using the Gparted live CD as /dev/hde > Which sounds about right. > > The other drives show up as /dev/hda (Primary Master) and > /dev/hdc (Secondary Master). /dev/hdb is an empty removable > drive caddy (Primary Slave) and /dev/hdd (Seconday Slave) is > the DVD-RW drive. > > So I now have a maximum of 8 IDE ports - 4 on the IDE > controller built into the motherboard (which BTW are all > A-OK), and 4 on the IDE-PCI addon card. > > Vivard on the Ultimate Boot CD recognises the /dev/hde > drive, as being on the PCI controller. > > I was also able to format the 2GB Samsung drive on /dev/hde > as linux-swap using Gparted. > > The largest spare drive I have is ~7 GB, which might be > enough for a linux-swap partition, and a /var/log partition. > > The idea is to have any logging and other intensive disk I/O > on a spare disk drive, so as not wake up the main hard drive > with the Linux root partition on it. > > I just want to write any 'disposable data' to a spare > hard disk drive, and keep this seperated from stuff on my > main root partition/linux installation. > > Kind Regards, > > Keith Roberts > > -- > In theory, theory and practice are the same; > in practice they are not. > > This email was sent from my laptop with Centos 5.5 > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
