[CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0568 Important CentOS 5 dbus-glib Update

2013-02-28 Thread Johnny Hughes

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0568 Important

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0568.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
0223ca642952e05ebc211d0a4c70d384c940ac27b099bc3d75b54ca68f9c0f90  
dbus-glib-0.73-11.el5_9.i386.rpm
62777a9ce986e177104fe0e1a0f0426f301da6507598d498e9ce33fe2393455a  
dbus-glib-devel-0.73-11.el5_9.i386.rpm

x86_64:
0223ca642952e05ebc211d0a4c70d384c940ac27b099bc3d75b54ca68f9c0f90  
dbus-glib-0.73-11.el5_9.i386.rpm
04b24df1ce6e666a9270a596a472f35feeaf6b838b8c243d4a84b9ca24de2520  
dbus-glib-0.73-11.el5_9.x86_64.rpm
62777a9ce986e177104fe0e1a0f0426f301da6507598d498e9ce33fe2393455a  
dbus-glib-devel-0.73-11.el5_9.i386.rpm
884d110f0c5379c6ca1fffdfbba09f54d92945dd81e6d212139189c113a20f57  
dbus-glib-devel-0.73-11.el5_9.x86_64.rpm

Source:
35b7f75cbbb1386b4e632c7492778b07f0701066f92bc336f5e52f6c6fc9  
dbus-glib-0.73-11.el5_9.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0575 CentOS 5 libvirt Update

2013-02-28 Thread Johnny Hughes

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0575 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0575.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
5d226b37e3a94f164d50aef45b3f6b7b0a64788404270fe021f5c6efc9e37dba  
libvirt-0.8.2-29.el5_9.1.i386.rpm
0a581b651ae75683f2448834b6bf2121d8ce2387c496bbced6999680a2202f83  
libvirt-devel-0.8.2-29.el5_9.1.i386.rpm
a8ff6a0b9fef2f20c5901bedaa2cb23d7d2350f607e9d04c8fe40949990f8540  
libvirt-python-0.8.2-29.el5_9.1.i386.rpm

x86_64:
5d226b37e3a94f164d50aef45b3f6b7b0a64788404270fe021f5c6efc9e37dba  
libvirt-0.8.2-29.el5_9.1.i386.rpm
f0d871e9abda492ba0bfb48ae25a0c0594d73c361a95464a5511c4779c844f0d  
libvirt-0.8.2-29.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm
0a581b651ae75683f2448834b6bf2121d8ce2387c496bbced6999680a2202f83  
libvirt-devel-0.8.2-29.el5_9.1.i386.rpm
5fea1922e24b927f92abe455120d70bbee8251374af868c7af90c7ccee4e8bf5  
libvirt-devel-0.8.2-29.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm
7456a0536afef03552b2b92293017e8bae17fc60536dcd3bf4a6053e62628ba6  
libvirt-python-0.8.2-29.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm

Source:
5ca698b978950796c6098fb3c1d3ce8dd7f4f963663daa068cd744b3a4331a41  
libvirt-0.8.2-29.el5_9.1.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0581 Moderate CentOS 5 libxml2 Update

2013-02-28 Thread Johnny Hughes

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0581 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0581.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
37744da0abe7d75464da9498d9ad2575c550e875cf068f0d00e30d8c9221b0b5  
libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.1.i386.rpm
4a444273456b1fdba7330b37e6033715b7d471530e14c2d6f0e516fc6897f205  
libxml2-devel-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.1.i386.rpm
144b9741b82d70cb82de090609482987d34d6cdac657a9fbb9954f569cbdbaa0  
libxml2-python-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.1.i386.rpm

x86_64:
37744da0abe7d75464da9498d9ad2575c550e875cf068f0d00e30d8c9221b0b5  
libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.1.i386.rpm
a68601aad7a108fc5dce83d8d107a8e4850afcd58e378360a34123b6b639435b  
libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm
4a444273456b1fdba7330b37e6033715b7d471530e14c2d6f0e516fc6897f205  
libxml2-devel-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.1.i386.rpm
f528e385046af9543854df65f50ab7214e2d62812752e52f3a2e98712ad4c268  
libxml2-devel-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm
cbe3c0ecbe4dd9f6696e440617862ee876999b7f4c3d7eab36214aee74008d01  
libxml2-python-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm

Source:
30a7bb607148784ac9bf6e76a4ab1914df94d4a2cbf2f5d23c7a4665aeef99c7  
libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.1.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-es] Analizador de Tráfico P2P

2013-02-28 Thread Cristhian Tinoco

Buen día,

Por favor si me pueden ayudar a determinar cuáles son la herramientas para 
monitorear el tráfico en mi LAN, sobre todo para identificar los equipos que 
emplean puertos para aplicaciones P2P. 


  
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS] hp1213nf mfp printer driver in centos6.2

2013-02-28 Thread Rob Kampen

On 02/28/2013 08:37 PM, Asok Mallick wrote:

Dear Sir,
 Please know me how to function hp 1213nf mfp printer (printer + scanner 
+ fax + copy) in centOS 6.2. The computer shows the printer but cannot oprate. the 
message displayed Missing printer driver  etc.
You give very little information. Is this a desktop system, rather than 
a headless server? Are you running gnome desktop or KDE?

Have you tried anything to get this going?
i.e. have you used SystemAdministrationPrinting to add the printer? 
(assuming the CentOS default gnome is your desktop system).
Two minutes with google and it seems that this device is supported under 
Linux with their HPLIP open source printer system for some 2000+ HP 
printers.



 This will be very helpful to me if anyone can inform me the 
technique to operate this printer in centOS 6.2.
   Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
 Asok mallick.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] hp1213nf mfp printer driver in centos6.2

2013-02-28 Thread Rob Kampen


On 02/28/2013 08:37 PM, Asok Mallick wrote:

Dear Sir,
 Please know me how to function hp 1213nf mfp printer (printer + scanner 
+ fax + copy) in centOS 6.2. The computer shows the printer but cannot oprate. the 
message displayed Missing printer driver  etc.
It seems that CentOS currently has HPLIP v 3.10.9 and you will need to 
install a later version as it needs v 3.11.1 or later.
see 
hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/models/laserjet/hp_laserjet_professional_m1213nf_mfp.html

 This will be very helpful to me if anyone can inform me the 
technique to operate this printer in centOS 6.2.
   Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
 Asok mallick.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] hp1213nf mfp printer driver in centos6.2

2013-02-28 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/27/2013 11:37 PM, Asok Mallick wrote:
  Please know me how to function hp 1213nf mfp printer 
 (printer + scanner + fax + copy) in centOS 6.2. The computer shows the 
 printer but cannot oprate. the message displayed Missing printer driver  
 etc.
  This will be very helpful to me if anyone can inform me the 
 technique to operate this printer in centOS 6.2.

http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/index.html?



-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS 6.4 in the making perhaps?

2013-02-28 Thread Sorin Srbu
I see Johnny Hughes has released CR-updates for CentOS 6.

Is CentOS 6.4 brewing yet then? 8-)

-- 
BW,
Sorin
---
# Sorin Srbu[Sysadmin, Systems Engineer]
# Dept of Medicinal Chemistry,  Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 3 signals GSM
# Div of Org Pharm Chem,Mobile: +46 (0)70-4250229
# Box 574, Uppsala University,  Fax: +46 (0)18-4714482
# SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden Visit: BMC, Husargatan 3, D5:512b
#   Web: http://www.orgfarm.uu.se
---
# ()  ASCII ribbon campaign - Against html E-mail 
# /\
#
# This message was not sent from an iProduct!
#
# MotD follows:
# CentOS: In Service.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Centos6.4 via CR-repo; boot problems

2013-02-28 Thread jvermeulen
Dear All,

after updating to Centos6.4 via cr-repo, my laptop hangs on:

starting crond :ok

I booted in single user mode but I'm not sure what to change 

The laptop is an older MSI, hardware details attached.

what could be the issue here?

greetings, J.




localhost.localdomain
description: Notebook
product: MSI Notebook M670 (To Be Filled By O.E.M.)
vendor: Micro-Star International
version: Ver 1.000
serial: System Serial Number
width: 32 bits
capabilities: smbios-2.5 dmi-2.5 smp-1.4 smp
configuration: boot=normal chassis=notebook cpus=1 family=To Be Filled By 
O.E.M. sku=To Be Filled By O.E.M. uuid=00020003-0004-0005-0006-000700080009
  *-core
   description: Motherboard
   product: MS-1632
   vendor: MSI
   physical id: 0
   version: Ver 1.000
   serial: BSS-0123456789
   slot: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
 *-firmware
  description: BIOS
  vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  physical id: 0
  version: A1632NMS Ver7.0A
  date: 07/23/2007
  size: 64KiB
  capacity: 448KiB
  capabilities: isa pci pnp apm upgrade shadowing escd cdboot 
bootselect socketedrom edd int13floppy1200 int13floppy720 int13floppy2880 
int5printscreen int9keyboard int14serial int17printer int10video acpi usb 
ls120boot zipboot biosbootspecification
 *-cpu:0
  description: CPU
  product: Mobile AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3500+
  vendor: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD]
  physical id: 4
  bus info: cpu@0
  version: 15.12.2
  serial: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  slot: CPU 1
  size: 800MHz
  capacity: 1800MHz
  width: 64 bits
  clock: 200MHz
  capabilities: x86-64 boot fpu fpu_exception wp vme de pse tsc msr pae 
mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall 
nx mmxext fxsr_opt rdtscp 3dnowext 3dnow up extd_apicid pni cx16 lahf_lm 
extapic cr8_legacy cpufreq
  configuration: cores=1 enabledcores=1
*-cache:0
 description: L1 cache
 physical id: 5
 slot: L1-Cache
 size: 128KiB
 capacity: 128KiB
 capabilities: pipeline-burst internal varies data
*-cache:1
 description: L2 cache
 physical id: 6
 slot: L2-Cache
 size: 512KiB
 capacity: 512KiB
 capabilities: pipeline-burst internal varies unified
 *-cpu:1 DISABLED
  description: CPU [empty]
  product: (To Be Filled By O.E.M.)
  physical id: 8
  serial: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  slot: CPU 2
 *-memory:0
  description: System Memory
  physical id: 29
  slot: System board or motherboard
  size: 1GiB
*-bank:0
 description: DIMM DDR2 Synchronous 333 MHz (3,0 ns)
 product: PartNum0
 vendor: Manufacturer0
 physical id: 0
 serial: SerNum0
 slot: DIMM0
 size: 512MiB
 width: 64 bits
 clock: 333MHz (3.0ns)
*-bank:1
 description: DIMM DDR2 Synchronous 333 MHz (3,0 ns)
 product: PartNum1
 vendor: Manufacturer1
 physical id: 1
 serial: SerNum1
 slot: DIMM1
 size: 512MiB
 width: 64 bits
 clock: 333MHz (3.0ns)
 *-memory:1 UNCLAIMED
  description: RAM memory
  product: C51 Host Bridge
  vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
  physical id: 1
  bus info: pci@:00:00.0
  version: a2
  width: 32 bits
  clock: 66MHz (15.2ns)
  capabilities: ht bus_master cap_list
  configuration: latency=0
 *-memory:2 UNCLAIMED
  description: RAM memory
  product: C51 Memory Controller 1
  vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
  physical id: 0.2
  bus info: pci@:00:00.2
  version: a2
  width: 32 bits
  clock: 66MHz (15.2ns)
  configuration: latency=0
 *-memory:3 UNCLAIMED
  description: RAM memory
  product: C51 Memory Controller 5
  vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
  physical id: 0.3
  bus info: pci@:00:00.3
  version: a2
  width: 32 bits
  clock: 66MHz (15.2ns)
  configuration: latency=0
 *-memory:4 UNCLAIMED
  description: RAM memory
  product: C51 Memory Controller 4
  vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
  physical id: 0.4
  bus info: pci@:00:00.4
  version: a2
  width: 32 bits
  clock: 66MHz (15.2ns)
  capabilities: bus_master
  configuration: latency=0
 *-memory:5 UNCLAIMED
  description: RAM memory
  product: C51 Host Bridge
  vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
  physical 

Re: [CentOS] Centos6.4 via CR-repo; boot problems -solved by removing kmod-nvidia

2013-02-28 Thread Johan Vermeulen
Op 28-02-13 10:04, jvermeulen schreef:
 Dear All,

 after updating to Centos6.4 via cr-repo, my laptop hangs on:

 starting crond :ok

 I booted in single user mode but I'm not sure what to change 

 The laptop is an older MSI, hardware details attached.

 what could be the issue here?

 greetings, J.

Solved after removing Elrepo-package kmod-nvidia.
I had that installed for being able to use an external monitor.

greetings, J.






 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 in the making perhaps?

2013-02-28 Thread Nux!
On 28.02.2013 08:31, Sorin Srbu wrote:
 I see Johnny Hughes has released CR-updates for CentOS 6.
 
 Is CentOS 6.4 brewing yet then? 8-)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9lbCrjqMKw

-- 
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 in the making perhaps?

2013-02-28 Thread Sorin Srbu
 -Original Message-
 From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
 Behalf Of Nux!
 Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 10:23 AM
 To: CentOS mailing list
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 in the making perhaps?
 
 On 28.02.2013 08:31, Sorin Srbu wrote:
  I see Johnny Hughes has released CR-updates for CentOS 6.
 
  Is CentOS 6.4 brewing yet then? 8-)
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9lbCrjqMKw

LOL!! The dark man is coming. I'm sure Johnny appreciates that. ;-)

Nice track though!

-- 
/Sorin
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 in the making perhaps?

2013-02-28 Thread Johan Vermeulen

Op 28-02-13 10:23, Nux! schreef:
 On 28.02.2013 08:31, Sorin Srbu wrote:
 I see Johnny Hughes has released CR-updates for CentOS 6.

 Is CentOS 6.4 brewing yet then? 8-)
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9lbCrjqMKw

I enjoyed watching that video. Thanks for sharing

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos6.4 via CR-repo; boot problems -solved by removing kmod-nvidia

2013-02-28 Thread Ned Slider
On 28/02/13 10:52, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
 Op 28-02-13 10:04, jvermeulen schreef:
 Dear All,

 after updating to Centos6.4 via cr-repo, my laptop hangs on:

 starting crond :ok

 I booted in single user mode but I'm not sure what to change 

 The laptop is an older MSI, hardware details attached.

 what could be the issue here?

 greetings, J.

 Solved after removing Elrepo-package kmod-nvidia.
 I had that installed for being able to use an external monitor.


Without posting any details like what version of the driver you are 
using, or a copy of your xorg.log file showing the errors it's 
impossible to say or do much other than guess at the problem.

However, I have done my best to test your scenario. The latest NVIDIA 
driver to support your hardware (from elrepo) is kmod-nvidia-304xx, the 
304 series legacy driver (if you are unsure, trying installing and 
running nvidia-detect from elrepo which will advise you of the correct 
driver for your hardware).

I can tell you that this driver works fine with the 6.4 update. There 
was some doubt about whether older drivers would support 6.4 as Xorg 
received an ABI update to 13.1 in the 6.4 release which older display 
drivers might not support. However, I have confirmed that the 304.xx 
legacy drivers and the latest 310.xx series NVIDIA drivers both fully 
support the version of Xorg shipped with 6.4

So, my best guess is that you were maybe running an old version of the 
NVIDIA drivers and needed to update? But as I said above, without any 
further clues to work with I'm really guessing in the dark.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos6.4 via CR-repo; boot problems -solved by removing kmod-nvidia

2013-02-28 Thread Johan Vermeulen

Op 28-02-13 12:21, Ned Slider schreef:
 On 28/02/13 10:52, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
 Op 28-02-13 10:04, jvermeulen schreef:
 Dear All,

 after updating to Centos6.4 via cr-repo, my laptop hangs on:

 starting crond :ok

 I booted in single user mode but I'm not sure what to change 

 The laptop is an older MSI, hardware details attached.

 what could be the issue here?

 greetings, J.
 Solved after removing Elrepo-package kmod-nvidia.
 I had that installed for being able to use an external monitor.

 Without posting any details like what version of the driver you are
 using, or a copy of your xorg.log file showing the errors it's
 impossible to say or do much other than guess at the problem.

 However, I have done my best to test your scenario. The latest NVIDIA
 driver to support your hardware (from elrepo) is kmod-nvidia-304xx, the
 304 series legacy driver (if you are unsure, trying installing and
 running nvidia-detect from elrepo which will advise you of the correct
 driver for your hardware).

 I can tell you that this driver works fine with the 6.4 update. There
 was some doubt about whether older drivers would support 6.4 as Xorg
 received an ABI update to 13.1 in the 6.4 release which older display
 drivers might not support. However, I have confirmed that the 304.xx
 legacy drivers and the latest 310.xx series NVIDIA drivers both fully
 support the version of Xorg shipped with 6.4

 So, my best guess is that you were maybe running an old version of the
 NVIDIA drivers and needed to update? But as I said above, without any
 further clues to work with I'm really guessing in the dark.


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Hello,

thanks for looking in to this.

Indeed, I should have included xorg.log. It took me longer than it 
should have to realize it was a graphical issue.

Not updating could be the issue, I installed kmod-nvidia but never ran 
an update with Elrepo repo enabled.
I will test that and report back.

Greetings, J.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos6.4 via CR-repo; boot problems -solved by removing kmod-nvidia

2013-02-28 Thread Ned Slider
On 28/02/13 11:42, Johan Vermeulen wrote:

 Op 28-02-13 12:21, Ned Slider schreef:
 On 28/02/13 10:52, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
 Op 28-02-13 10:04, jvermeulen schreef:
 Dear All,

 after updating to Centos6.4 via cr-repo, my laptop hangs on:

 starting crond :ok

 I booted in single user mode but I'm not sure what to change 

 The laptop is an older MSI, hardware details attached.

 what could be the issue here?

 greetings, J.
 Solved after removing Elrepo-package kmod-nvidia.
 I had that installed for being able to use an external monitor.

 Without posting any details like what version of the driver you are
 using, or a copy of your xorg.log file showing the errors it's
 impossible to say or do much other than guess at the problem.

 However, I have done my best to test your scenario. The latest NVIDIA
 driver to support your hardware (from elrepo) is kmod-nvidia-304xx, the
 304 series legacy driver (if you are unsure, trying installing and
 running nvidia-detect from elrepo which will advise you of the correct
 driver for your hardware).

 I can tell you that this driver works fine with the 6.4 update. There
 was some doubt about whether older drivers would support 6.4 as Xorg
 received an ABI update to 13.1 in the 6.4 release which older display
 drivers might not support. However, I have confirmed that the 304.xx
 legacy drivers and the latest 310.xx series NVIDIA drivers both fully
 support the version of Xorg shipped with 6.4

 So, my best guess is that you were maybe running an old version of the
 NVIDIA drivers and needed to update? But as I said above, without any
 further clues to work with I'm really guessing in the dark.


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

 Hello,

 thanks for looking in to this.

 Indeed, I should have included xorg.log. It took me longer than it
 should have to realize it was a graphical issue.

 Not updating could be the issue, I installed kmod-nvidia but never ran
 an update with Elrepo repo enabled.
 I will test that and report back.

 Greetings, J.


That indeed sounds like the issue. Try (re)installing the latest version 
that supports your hardware, kmod-nvidia-304xx:

yum install kmod-nvidia-304xx

and reboot.

Hope that helps.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos6.4 via CR-repo; boot problems - realy solved by reinstalling kmod-nvidia

2013-02-28 Thread Johan Vermeulen

Op 28-02-13 12:34, Ned Slider schreef:
 On 28/02/13 11:42, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
 Op 28-02-13 12:21, Ned Slider schreef:
 On 28/02/13 10:52, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
 Op 28-02-13 10:04, jvermeulen schreef:
 Dear All,

 after updating to Centos6.4 via cr-repo, my laptop hangs on:

 starting crond :ok

 I booted in single user mode but I'm not sure what to change 

 The laptop is an older MSI, hardware details attached.

 what could be the issue here?

 greetings, J.
 Solved after removing Elrepo-package kmod-nvidia.
 I had that installed for being able to use an external monitor.

 Without posting any details like what version of the driver you are
 using, or a copy of your xorg.log file showing the errors it's
 impossible to say or do much other than guess at the problem.

 However, I have done my best to test your scenario. The latest NVIDIA
 driver to support your hardware (from elrepo) is kmod-nvidia-304xx, the
 304 series legacy driver (if you are unsure, trying installing and
 running nvidia-detect from elrepo which will advise you of the correct
 driver for your hardware).

 I can tell you that this driver works fine with the 6.4 update. There
 was some doubt about whether older drivers would support 6.4 as Xorg
 received an ABI update to 13.1 in the 6.4 release which older display
 drivers might not support. However, I have confirmed that the 304.xx
 legacy drivers and the latest 310.xx series NVIDIA drivers both fully
 support the version of Xorg shipped with 6.4

 So, my best guess is that you were maybe running an old version of the
 NVIDIA drivers and needed to update? But as I said above, without any
 further clues to work with I'm really guessing in the dark.


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 Hello,

 thanks for looking in to this.

 Indeed, I should have included xorg.log. It took me longer than it
 should have to realize it was a graphical issue.

 Not updating could be the issue, I installed kmod-nvidia but never ran
 an update with Elrepo repo enabled.
 I will test that and report back.

 Greetings, J.

 That indeed sounds like the issue. Try (re)installing the latest version
 that supports your hardware, kmod-nvidia-304xx:

 yum install kmod-nvidia-304xx

 and reboot.

 Hope that helps.


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Hello,

that solved the issue. I'm now running Centos6.4 with package 
kmod-nvidia-304xx.

and I tried nvidia--detect as well:

-bash-4.1# nvidia-detect
Probing for supported NVIDIA devices...
Found: [10de:0247] NVIDIA Corporation C51 [GeForce Go 6100]
This device requires the NVIDIA legacy 304.xx driver (kmod-nvidia-304xx).

Thanks for helping me out.

Greetings, J.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] suggestions for simple audio editor

2013-02-28 Thread Carl T. Miller
I want to grab some sound bites out of several mp4 files, so I
extracted the audio portion into wav files to make editing easier.

After trying several Google searches, it looks like audacity is
the audio editor of choice, but I'm finding it very difficult to
work with.  Notably I am not able to make a selection with finer
granularity than a full second.

Are there any simple audio file editors that you can recommend?
I'd like to find something more intuitive than audacity, but am
not having much luck with my searches using yum and google.

c
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] suggestions for simple audio editor

2013-02-28 Thread Nux!
On 28.02.2013 12:32, Carl T. Miller wrote:
 I want to grab some sound bites out of several mp4 files, so I
 extracted the audio portion into wav files to make editing easier.
 
 After trying several Google searches, it looks like audacity is
 the audio editor of choice, but I'm finding it very difficult to
 work with.  Notably I am not able to make a selection with finer
 granularity than a full second.
 
 Are there any simple audio file editors that you can recommend?
 I'd like to find something more intuitive than audacity, but am
 not having much luck with my searches using yum and google.

If you're only interested into cutting out part of the audio, ffmpeg 
can extract certain intervals and I think it has a finer granularity.

HTH

-- 
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos6.4 via CR-repo; boot problems - realy solved by reinstalling kmod-nvidia

2013-02-28 Thread Ned Slider
On 28/02/13 12:32, Johan Vermeulen wrote:

 Op 28-02-13 12:34, Ned Slider schreef:
 On 28/02/13 11:42, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
 Op 28-02-13 12:21, Ned Slider schreef:
 On 28/02/13 10:52, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
 Op 28-02-13 10:04, jvermeulen schreef:
 Dear All,

 after updating to Centos6.4 via cr-repo, my laptop hangs on:

 starting crond :ok

 I booted in single user mode but I'm not sure what to change 

 The laptop is an older MSI, hardware details attached.

 what could be the issue here?

 greetings, J.
 Solved after removing Elrepo-package kmod-nvidia.
 I had that installed for being able to use an external monitor.

 Without posting any details like what version of the driver you are
 using, or a copy of your xorg.log file showing the errors it's
 impossible to say or do much other than guess at the problem.

 However, I have done my best to test your scenario. The latest NVIDIA
 driver to support your hardware (from elrepo) is kmod-nvidia-304xx, the
 304 series legacy driver (if you are unsure, trying installing and
 running nvidia-detect from elrepo which will advise you of the correct
 driver for your hardware).

 I can tell you that this driver works fine with the 6.4 update. There
 was some doubt about whether older drivers would support 6.4 as Xorg
 received an ABI update to 13.1 in the 6.4 release which older display
 drivers might not support. However, I have confirmed that the 304.xx
 legacy drivers and the latest 310.xx series NVIDIA drivers both fully
 support the version of Xorg shipped with 6.4

 So, my best guess is that you were maybe running an old version of the
 NVIDIA drivers and needed to update? But as I said above, without any
 further clues to work with I'm really guessing in the dark.


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 Hello,

 thanks for looking in to this.

 Indeed, I should have included xorg.log. It took me longer than it
 should have to realize it was a graphical issue.

 Not updating could be the issue, I installed kmod-nvidia but never ran
 an update with Elrepo repo enabled.
 I will test that and report back.

 Greetings, J.

 That indeed sounds like the issue. Try (re)installing the latest version
 that supports your hardware, kmod-nvidia-304xx:

 yum install kmod-nvidia-304xx

 and reboot.

 Hope that helps.


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

 Hello,

 that solved the issue. I'm now running Centos6.4 with package
 kmod-nvidia-304xx.

 and I tried nvidia--detect as well:

 -bash-4.1# nvidia-detect
 Probing for supported NVIDIA devices...
 Found: [10de:0247] NVIDIA Corporation C51 [GeForce Go 6100]
 This device requires the NVIDIA legacy 304.xx driver (kmod-nvidia-304xx).

 Thanks for helping me out.

 Greetings, J.


You're welcome - glad you got it sorted.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] suggestions for simple audio editor

2013-02-28 Thread Fred Smith
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:21:50PM +, Nux! wrote:
 On 28.02.2013 12:32, Carl T. Miller wrote:
  I want to grab some sound bites out of several mp4 files, so I
  extracted the audio portion into wav files to make editing easier.
  
  After trying several Google searches, it looks like audacity is
  the audio editor of choice, but I'm finding it very difficult to
  work with.  Notably I am not able to make a selection with finer
  granularity than a full second.

I don't understand,... I can select very fine-grained selections in 
Audacity. You probably need to zoom in on the track so you can position
the cursor properly, but once you've done so, you can select very
precisely.

  Are there any simple audio file editors that you can recommend?
  I'd like to find something more intuitive than audacity, but am
  not having much luck with my searches using yum and google.
 
 If you're only interested into cutting out part of the audio, ffmpeg 
 can extract certain intervals and I think it has a finer granularity.
 
 HTH

-- 
---
 .Fred Smith   /  
( /__  ,__.   __   __ /  __   : / 
 //  /   /__) /  /  /__) .+'   Home: fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us 
//  (__ (___ (__(_ (___ / :__ 781-438-5471 
 Jude 1:24,25 -
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Newbie - yum update and repos problems

2013-02-28 Thread Bruce Whealton
Oh, ok. But I didn't specify to use c6-media?  I was just using the command
yum update or yum install php*
How do I tell it not to use c6-media?
Thanks,
Bruce
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 8:30 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Newbie - yum update and repos problems

On 2/27/2013 5:21 PM, Bruce Whealton wrote:
 file:///media/CentOS/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] Could not 
 open/read file:///media/CentOS/repodata/repomd.xml
 Trying other mirror.
 file:///media/cdrecorder/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] Could not 
 open/read file:///media/cdrecorder/repodata/repomd.xml
 Trying other mirror.
 file:///media/cdrom/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] Could not 
 open/read file:///media/cdrom/repodata/repomd.xml
 Trying other mirror.
 Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository:
 c6-media. Please verify its path and try again


did you specify to enable the c6-media repository on your yum command 
line?c6-media is a reference to the centos6 DVD, and its looking to 
see if its mounted in /media/CentOS or /media/cdrom or /media/cdrecorder

I've /never/ messed with c6-media, as I don't use disks hardly ever, and I'd
rather get the latest rpms from the update respositories.

-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] suggestions for simple audio editor

2013-02-28 Thread Carl T. Miller
On 02/28/2013 09:38 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
 On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:21:50PM +, Nux! wrote:
 On 28.02.2013 12:32, Carl T. Miller wrote:
 After trying several Google searches, it looks like audacity is
 the audio editor of choice, but I'm finding it very difficult to
 work with.  Notably I am not able to make a selection with finer
 granularity than a full second.
 I don't understand,... I can select very fine-grained selections in
 Audacity. You probably need to zoom in on the track so you can position
 the cursor properly, but once you've done so, you can select very
 precisely.

Yes, that's what I expected.  But even after zooming in with
the zoom tool to where I see hundreths of a second, I still
cannot select less than a full second at a time.

 Are there any simple audio file editors that you can recommend?
 I'd like to find something more intuitive than audacity, but am
 not having much luck with my searches using yum and google.
 If you're only interested into cutting out part of the audio, ffmpeg
 can extract certain intervals and I think it has a finer granularity.
Nux, I was hoping to find a gui to do it all.  For now I'll try
using audacity to find the start/finish times and then ffmpeg
to extract.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 in the making perhaps?

2013-02-28 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/28/2013 02:31 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
 I see Johnny Hughes has released CR-updates for CentOS 6.

 Is CentOS 6.4 brewing yet then? 8-)

Eventually, yes ... thats how it goes, right?

We are working on the consolidated tree, spinning isos, QA'ing those, etc.

CR is for access now, for those what want it ... the tree should be
along soon.  Not exactly sure when soon will be yet :)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] suggestions for simple audio editor

2013-02-28 Thread Fred Smith
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:24:12AM -0500, Carl T. Miller wrote:
 On 02/28/2013 09:38 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
  On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:21:50PM +, Nux! wrote:
  On 28.02.2013 12:32, Carl T. Miller wrote:
  After trying several Google searches, it looks like audacity is
  the audio editor of choice, but I'm finding it very difficult to
  work with.  Notably I am not able to make a selection with finer
  granularity than a full second.
  I don't understand,... I can select very fine-grained selections in
  Audacity. You probably need to zoom in on the track so you can position
  the cursor properly, but once you've done so, you can select very
  precisely.
 
 Yes, that's what I expected.  But even after zooming in with
 the zoom tool to where I see hundreths of a second, I still
 cannot select less than a full second at a time.

What I think you're saying is: if you place the cursor at a location
that is, e.g., 1.43 seconds into the clip, right-click then drag (in
either direction) until you've selected the part you want to cut, that
Audacity moves the endpoints of you selection from where you put them
to a whole-second point?

because that's exactly what I've done manay times and it highlights
the part over which I've dragged the cursor, and I can cut it by
simply hitting the DEL key.

Or are you trying to do it in some different way?

I've placed a screenshot in my web space at:

http://users.rcn.com/fredricksmith/Screenshot-korngold_01.png

of an Audacity session with a selected region that neither begins nor
ends on a 1-second bounary. With that selected, I could hit the DEL key
and poof! it goes away.

Note that at the bottom of the window it displays the begin and end
points of the selection, so you can see what has been selected.

This is Audacity 1.3.12 Beta from the epel repository. Is that the
one you're using?

Fred

-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
  The eyes of the Lord are everywhere, 
keeping watch on the wicked and the good.
- Proverbs 15:3 (niv) -
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] What can I do to UNDERSTAND why I can't reach centos.org (but everyone else can)?

2013-02-28 Thread Rock
What can I do to UNDERSTAND why, periodically, I can't reach 
www.centos.org (but everyone else can)?

Every few months, http://www.centos.org just drops off for me
and for me only. It's not the web site, because I can reach it
via a proxy (e.g., TOR browser bundle) and other tests show it
to be alive (e.g., http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/centos.org
or http://traceroute.monitis.com).

But, for me, I just can't reach it by any means. 

Mike Easter kindly determined centos.org does not echo ICMP or UDP
pings, only TCP, and its associated netblock level3 doesn't echo UDP, 
but does echo ICMP and TCP.

But, for me, this is what a traceroute returned just now on Centos:

$ traceroute www.centos.org 
... early hops removed ... 
16  ae-6-6.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.148.201)  211.850 ms 
ae-3-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.132.78)  205.221 ms 
ae-6-6.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.148.201)  207.392 ms
17  ae-3-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.132.78)  128.453 ms 
ae-73-73.csw2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.145)  160.451 ms 
ae-93-93.csw4.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.169)  160.437 ms
18  ae-83-83.csw3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.157)  165.923 ms 
ae-1-60.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.145.8)  165.920 ms  178.414 ms
19  LAYERED-TEC.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.6)  241.537 ms  244.324 ms 
ae-3-80.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.145.136)  244.318 ms
20  * LAYERED-TEC.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.6)  244.291 ms  244.250 ms
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *

Here is a screenshot (modified to remove early hops) using mtr:
 $ mtr www.centos.org
   http://www2.picturepush.com/photo/a/12303130/img/12303130.png

My related questions are:
1. What can I do (on Centos) to UNDERSTAND this problem?
2. Why does this problem happen every few months to me (and to just me)?
3. How can the net be this arbitrary and still work?


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What can I do to UNDERSTAND why I can't reach centos.org (but everyone else can)?

2013-02-28 Thread m . roth
Rock wrote:
 What can I do to UNDERSTAND why, periodically, I can't reach
 www.centos.org (but everyone else can)?

 Every few months, http://www.centos.org just drops off for me
 and for me only. It's not the web site, because I can reach it
 via a proxy (e.g., TOR browser bundle) and other tests show it
 to be alive (e.g., http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/centos.org
 or http://traceroute.monitis.com).

 But, for me, I just can't reach it by any means.

Could you define me? Are you using this at home, or at work? What kind
of connection? If this is work, are you paying for a fix IP?

 Mike Easter kindly determined centos.org does not echo ICMP or UDP
 pings, only TCP, and its associated netblock level3 doesn't echo UDP,
 but does echo ICMP and TCP.

 But, for me, this is what a traceroute returned just now on Centos:

 $ traceroute www.centos.org
 ... early hops removed ...
 16  ae-6-6.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.148.201)  211.850 ms
 ae-3-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.132.78)  205.221 ms
 ae-6-6.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.148.201)  207.392 ms
 17  ae-3-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.132.78)  128.453 ms
 ae-73-73.csw2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.145)  160.451 ms
 ae-93-93.csw4.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.169)  160.437 ms
 18  ae-83-83.csw3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.157)  165.923 ms
 ae-1-60.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.145.8)  165.920 ms  178.414 ms
 19  LAYERED-TEC.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.6)  241.537 ms  244.324
 ms ae-3-80.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.145.136)  244.318 ms
 20  * LAYERED-TEC.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.6)  244.291 ms
 244.250 ms

Interesting. I get to 20 (except for me it's 15), and www.centos.org is
the next hop (16). Now, I *do* have fat pipes and good connections (this
is a US fed gov't site), but still
snip
 My related questions are:
 1. What can I do (on Centos) to UNDERSTAND this problem?
 2. Why does this problem happen every few months to me (and to just me)?
 3. How can the net be this arbitrary and still work?

Have you spoken to your ISP? When you try the traceroute, and it fails,
have you tried other well-known locations, like google.com, or
slashdot.org?

Also, have you compared the contents of /etc/resolv.conf now, and again
when centos.org isn't visible?

Sounds like either a firewall, spam, or nameserver issue.

 mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] remote logging with rsyslog [SOLVED]

2013-02-28 Thread Nelson Green



 From: denverpi...@me.com
 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:57:27 -0700
 To: centos@centos.org
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] remote logging with rsyslog [SOLVED]
 
 
 On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Nelson Green nelsongree...@hotmail.com wrote:
  
  Yep, that was it. Thanks for setting me straight.
  
  And apologies for the top-posting reply previously. I pasted the reply and 
  just
  wasn't paying attention.  My mother raised me better than that.
 
 No problem, was just a hunch... happens all the time with selinux.  
 
 As far as top/bottom-posting goes, I'm sure the list has some policy but I've 
 never gotten overly-concerned about it personally for years... life's too 
 short to worry about it. :-)
 
 Nate

Thanks! My thoughts too, but some people don't see it that way.

All the best,
Nelson
  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What can I do to UNDERSTAND why I can't reach centos.org (but everyone else can)?

2013-02-28 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/28/2013 9:12 AM, Rock wrote:
 $ traceroutewww.centos.org  
 ... early hops removed ...
 16  ae-6-6.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.148.201)  211.850 ms 
 ae-3-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.132.78)  205.221 ms
 ...

thats a rather high hop count to get that far.  I see...

$ traceroute www.centos.org
traceroute to www.centos.org (72.232.194.162), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
  1  ge-0-0-1-414.er2.sjc1.got.net (207.111.214.242)  0.511 ms  0.440 
ms  0.462 ms
  2  ge-0-0-1-10.cr1.scz1.got.net (207.111.198.49)  3.961 ms  3.956 ms  
4.193 ms
  3  ge-1-3-0-745.cr1.sfo1.got.net (207.111.219.131)  7.796 ms  7.784 
ms  7.765 ms
  4  vlan114.car2.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net (4.53.130.89)  28.162 ms 
28.165 ms  29.320 ms
  5  ae-2-4.bar2.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net (4.69.133.158)  8.636 ms 8.621 
ms  8.594 ms
  6  ae-6-6.ebr2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.140.154)  50.823 ms 50.664 
ms  50.917 ms
  7  ae-2-2.ebr2.SanJose5.Level3.net (4.69.148.141)  50.709 ms 50.545 
ms  50.533 ms
  8  ae-6-6.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.148.201)  50.560 ms 50.566 
ms  50.543 ms
  9  ae-3-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.132.78)  50.524 ms  50.418 ms  
50.407 ms
10  ae-93-93.csw4.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.169)  50.373 ms 50.310 ms 
ae-63-63.csw1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.133)  56.827 ms
11  ae-4-90.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.145.200)  50.268 ms 
ae-1-60.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.145.8)  50.282 ms 
ae-2-70.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.145.72)  50.335 ms
12  LAYERED-TEC.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.6)  50.386 ms 52.124 
ms  51.458 ms
13  www.centos.org (72.232.194.162)  51.202 ms !X  51.118 ms !X 51.113 ms !X


which is only 8 hops to that same LosAngeles1 gateway.

anyways, I never have any problems seeing it, so my guess is, your 
problem is in the first 15 hops you didn't show.

btw, the traceroute worked from my host using both -I and -T (icmp and 
tcp respectively) traces.




-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What can I do to UNDERSTAND why I can't reach centos.org (but everyone else can)?

2013-02-28 Thread Rock
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:40:55 -0500, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:

 Could you define me? Are you using this at home, or at work? What kind
 of connection? If this is work, are you paying for a fixed IP?

I have a fixed IP address at home.

 I get to 20 (except for me it's 15), and www.centos.org is
 the next hop (16).

After hashing this out on alt.comp.freeware all morning, 
someone surmised that my static public IP address might
have been added to a blocklist in the past few days, 
either by the penultimate hop or by centos.org itself. 

So, the question morphs to whether or not we have tools at
our disposal which can pinpoint which entity is blocking my 
IP address? 

Note: I left a phone message at the DNS registrant for 
the penultimate hop and I left an email for the centos.org
webmaster.

 have you compared the contents of /etc/resolv.conf now, 
 and again when centos.org isn't visible?

Well, I must admit I never even knew that file existed.
Here is what it has in it:

$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
  # Generated by NetworkManager
  nameserver 192.168.1.1



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Newbie - yum update and repos problems

2013-02-28 Thread SilverTip257
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Bruce Whealton br...@futurewaveonline.com
 wrote:

 Oh, ok. But I didn't specify to use c6-media?  I was just using the command
 yum update or yum install php*
 How do I tell it not to use c6-media?


Check for the media to be defined in your yum repo files.

/etc/yum.repos.d/
/etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo


Just like John Pierce, I rarely if ever use the CentOS ISOs ... my installs
are all PXE booted kickstart installs.

Images ready for pxe booting...
http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/6.3/os/x86_64/images/pxeboot/


Thanks,
 Bruce
 -Original Message-
 From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
 Behalf
 Of John R Pierce
 Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 8:30 PM
 To: centos@centos.org
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Newbie - yum update and repos problems

 On 2/27/2013 5:21 PM, Bruce Whealton wrote:
  file:///media/CentOS/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] Could not
  open/read file:///media/CentOS/repodata/repomd.xml
  Trying other mirror.
  file:///media/cdrecorder/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] Could not
  open/read file:///media/cdrecorder/repodata/repomd.xml
  Trying other mirror.
  file:///media/cdrom/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] Could not
  open/read file:///media/cdrom/repodata/repomd.xml
  Trying other mirror.
  Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository:
  c6-media. Please verify its path and try again


 did you specify to enable the c6-media repository on your yum command
 line?c6-media is a reference to the centos6 DVD, and its looking to
 see if its mounted in /media/CentOS or /media/cdrom or /media/cdrecorder

 I've /never/ messed with c6-media, as I don't use disks hardly ever, and
 I'd
 rather get the latest rpms from the update respositories.

 --
 john r pierce  37N 122W
 somewhere on the middle of the left coast

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


-- 
---~~.~~---
Mike
//  SilverTip257  //
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What can I do to UNDERSTAND why I can't reach centos.org (but everyone else can)?

2013-02-28 Thread Rock
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:06:35 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:

 thats a rather high hop count to get that far.  

Assuming you're in Santa Cruz, I'm not more than 20 miles from you, 
but, I'm using a mountain WISP (with radio relays on all the hilltops), 
so that's likely why I have many more hops than you do.

Here is my traceroute with a bit more detail (my local stuff
is redacted, for privacy).

$ date
Thu Feb 28 12:54:47 PST 2013

$ traceroute www.centos.org
traceroute to www.centos.org (72.232.194.162), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  router (192.168.1.1)  27.845 ms  27.807 ms  27.787 ms
 2  REDACTED STATIC IP ADDRESS 27.766 ms  27.745 ms  27.725 ms
 3  10.10.0.1 (10.10.0.1)  45.639 ms  51.532 ms  51.523 ms
 4  10.52.0.1 (10.52.0.1)  51.505 ms  53.765 ms  53.759 ms
 5  10.30.0.1 (10.30.0.1)  59.289 ms  62.681 ms  62.672 ms
 6  10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1)  65.632 ms  114.790 ms  124.655 ms
 7  REDACTED WISP   127.280 ms  127.282 ms  127.266 ms
 8  REDACTED WISP backbone 127.247 ms  121.642 ms  48.416 ms
 9  REDACTED WISP backbone 51.977 ms  55.483 ms  55.473 ms
10  REDACTED WISP backbone 64.521 ms  67.369 ms  67.352 ms
11  xe-9-0-0.edge1.SanJose3.Level3.net (4.68.110.49)  64.463 ms  67.261 ms 
xe-11-1-0.edge1.SanJose3.Level3.net (4.68.111.189)  69.552 ms
12  vlan60.csw1.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.152.62)  88.431 ms 
vlan70.csw2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.152.126)  91.063 ms 
vlan90.csw4.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.152.254)  90.976 ms
13  ae-62-62.ebr2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.153.17)  96.160 ms 
ae-61-61.ebr1.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.153.1)  90.955 ms 
ae-82-82.ebr2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.153.25)  90.896 ms
14  ae-5-5.ebr1.SanJose5.Level3.net (4.69.148.137)  76.111 ms 
ae-2-2.ebr2.SanJose5.Level3.net (4.69.148.141)  89.501 ms 
ae-5-5.ebr1.SanJose5.Level3.net (4.69.148.137)  76.081 ms
15  ae-6-6.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.148.201)  76.597 ms  76.026 ms  
82.326 ms
16  ae-3-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.132.78)  82.317 ms 
ae-6-6.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.148.201)  95.557 ms 
ae-3-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.132.78)  95.517 ms
17  ae-3-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.132.78)  95.466 ms  97.991 ms  95.449 
ms
18  ae-83-83.csw3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.157)  97.945 ms 
ae-1-60.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.145.8)  97.927 ms 
ae-93-93.csw4.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.169)  95.342 ms
19  ae-4-90.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.145.200)  97.833 ms 
LAYERED-TEC.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.6)  97.845 ms 
ae-3-80.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.145.136)  62.875 ms
20  LAYERED-TEC.edge3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.6)  77.207 ms  77.174 ms *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *

What I now know (that I had not known prior), is that the hop you see at 20 is 
the 
penultimate hop. 

So either hop 20 is not forwarding the packets, or the final destination is
not acknowledging them.

Someone suggested I might be on a blacklist, somehow, and that, at least, 
would make technical sense.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What can I do to UNDERSTAND why I can't reach centos.org (but everyone else can)?

2013-02-28 Thread m . roth
Rock wrote:
 On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:40:55 -0500, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:

 Could you define me? Are you using this at home, or at work? What kind
 of connection? If this is work, are you paying for a fixed IP?

 I have a fixed IP address at home.

 I get to 20 (except for me it's 15), and www.centos.org is
 the next hop (16).

 After hashing this out on alt.comp.freeware all morning,
 someone surmised that my static public IP address might
 have been added to a blocklist in the past few days,
 either by the penultimate hop or by centos.org itself.

Oh. great. Have any bouncing mail when centos.org disappears? I have this
happen a number of times a year, and yell about it every time. They use
dnsorbs, who I say use a blacklisting methodology that worked 15 years
ago, but is a complete disaster now, when one hosting co (as I have now),
or ISP (say, roadrunner in Chicago, which provides one third or one half
of *all* of Chicago's net access), and both have mail go through one
mailserver address... and when a few idiots get their systems or sites
compromised, dnsorbs instead of blocking each domain, blocs ALL the
hundreds of thousands of folks innocently emailing through their service
provider or hosting site. They don't seem to parse headers, and go *past*
the mailserver to the culprit. Thank you, I prefer fail2ban's methodology.

 So, the question morphs to whether or not we have tools at
 our disposal which can pinpoint which entity is blocking my
 IP address?

 Note: I left a phone message at the DNS registrant for
 the penultimate hop and I left an email for the centos.org
 webmaster.

 have you compared the contents of /etc/resolv.conf now,
 and again when centos.org isn't visible?

 Well, I must admit I never even knew that file existed.
 Here is what it has in it:

 $ cat /etc/resolv.conf
   # Generated by NetworkManager
   nameserver 192.168.1.1

Right, that's given you by your cable modem or router. Can you see what
that is on that ISP-provided box? Alternatively, add well-known
nameservers to that file, which will be overwritten when it's working
again. For example, you could add
nameserver 8.8.8.8
nameserver 8.8.4.4
(see https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/using)

   mark


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What can I do to UNDERSTAND why I can't reach centos.org (but everyone else can)?

2013-02-28 Thread Kahlil Hodgson
On 01/03/13 08:01, Rock wrote:
 So either hop 20 is not forwarding the packets, or the final destination is
 not acknowledging them.

Do you always have the same number of hops?  Wondering if the WISPs you 
bounce through might change.  Perhaps one of those is problematic.

 Someone suggested I might be on a blacklist, somehow, and that, at least,
 would make technical sense.

You could try checking something like

http://multirbl.valli.org/

to rule out blacklisting as the issue.

K
-- 
Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson   GPG: C9A02289
Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382
DealMax Pty Ltd(w) +61 (0) 3 9008 5281

Suite 1415
401 Docklands Drive
Docklands VIC 3008 Australia

All parts should go together without forcing.  You must remember that
the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you.  Therefore,
if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason.  By all
means, do not use a hammer.  -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What can I do to UNDERSTAND why I can't reach centos.org (but everyone else can)?

2013-02-28 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/28/2013 1:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 They don't seem to parse headers, and go*past*
 the mailserver to the culprit.

you can't parse the headers until you read them, and you can't read the 
headers until you accept the incoming message.   once you've accepted 
it, you can't bounce it back to the sending server via refusing the 
connection, and if you try and bounce it to the 'from' address you'll be 
spamming a lot of innocent parties who's email addresses have been 
forged on said headers.

so, if you use header parsing, all you can do is quietly drop the message.



-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What can I do to UNDERSTAND why I can't reach centos.org (but everyone else can)?

2013-02-28 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Kahlil Hodgson
kahlil.hodg...@dealmax.com.au wrote:

 Do you always have the same number of hops?  Wondering if the WISPs you
 bounce through might change.  Perhaps one of those is problematic.

 Someone suggested I might be on a blacklist, somehow, and that, at least,
 would make technical sense.

 You could try checking something like

 http://multirbl.valli.org/

 to rule out blacklisting as the issue.

The only blacklists I know about involve mail and require the
receiving machines to actively choose to do lookups and reject based
on the result.  Nothing should be dropping/blocking other types of
traffic.There are an assortment of 'looking glass' sites on the
internet where you can originate traceroutes and check that BGP routes
for source and targets are being propagated.
This seems to be a directory of those sites: http://www.lookinglass.org/

-- 
  Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What can I do to UNDERSTAND why I can't reach centos.org (but everyone else can)?

2013-02-28 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:52 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:

 They don't seem to parse headers, and go*past*
 the mailserver to the culprit.

 you can't parse the headers until you read them, and you can't read the
 headers until you accept the incoming message.   once you've accepted
 it, you can't bounce it back to the sending server via refusing the
 connection, and if you try and bounce it to the 'from' address you'll be
 spamming a lot of innocent parties who's email addresses have been
 forged on said headers.

 so, if you use header parsing, all you can do is quietly drop the message.

That's not true - there are several phases to smtp delivery and you
can reject at most of them.   You just have to have a mailer where you
can control the operations at the  right place.   Using sendmail with
MimeDefang as a milter gives you about as much control as possible if
you want to parse/scan headers and content and react accordingly.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Newbie - yum update and repos problems

2013-02-28 Thread Yves Bellefeuille
On Wednesday 27 February 2013, Bruce Whealton 
br...@futurewaveonline.com wrote:

So here is my problem.  I did some searches online about this
  and was a bit confused with regard to something.
 There error I get when I run yum begins with
  file:///media/CentOS/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] Could not
  open/read file:///media/CentOS/repodata/repomd.xml

The file /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Media.repo has a line that says 
enabled=0 by default. Did you change it to enabled=1?

-- 
Yves Bellefeuille y...@storm.ca
Simply put, E=mc^2 is liberal claptrap. -- Conservapedia.com

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What can I do to UNDERSTAND why I can't reach centos.org (but everyone else can)?

2013-02-28 Thread Rock
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:01:03 +1100, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:

 Do you always have the same number of hops?  Wondering if the WISPs you
 bounce through might change.  Perhaps one of those is problematic.

Dunno the exact number of hops but it's always long
but I only have 1 WISP so I don't have a choice.

It goes from my laptop to my home broadband router to my 
radio  antenna on the roof to the WISP antenna and at that point 
it bounces a while within the WISP's network before exiting on 
some backbone on it's merry way to centos.

The ONE STOP prior to centos.org is the last stop; but all other
web sites work. So, my assumption is that Centos.org is blocking 
me. I didn't think about this when I first posted this thread, 
but then someone told me that they ran a traceroute and there was 
only ONE STOP after where it stopped for me, so, that's when the 
light bulb lit.

Now, as to WHY they're blocking me - that I asked their webmaster 
by mail, earlier today.

 You could try checking something like 
   http://multirbl.valli.org/

Nice site. I see blacklists, whitelists, Yellowlists, neutralized, 
and even not listed as reports, and ALL (even the not listed) came 
up with zero. 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What can I do to UNDERSTAND why I can't reach centos.org (but everyone else can)?

2013-02-28 Thread Rock
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:56:44 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:

 This seems to be a directory of those sites: http://www.lookinglass.org/

Thanks. I had never heard of this. 
Going there, it wasn't obvious what to do, so, I'll hunt and peck a bit.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Newer SANE packages for 5.9 ??

2013-02-28 Thread Fred Smith
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 04:24:33PM -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com 
 wrote:
  On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:06:08 -0500
  fred smith wrote:
 
  I've been messing around with building sane from source, but have not
  been fully successful, yet, so thought before butchering my system any
  further I should ask if anyone has (or can point me to) newer Sane
  packages for EL5??
 
  This may be of interest to you.
 
  http://www.melvilletheatre.com/articles/canon-lide-110-scanner/
 
 That would work fine with CentOS-6. But the OP is running EL5.

Thanks to both Akemi and to Frank!

Yakemi's advice worked on Centos 5, and now that I've FINALLY upgraded
to 6.x, Frank's RPMS work fine for me too.

Ain't community support just grand? :)

Fred

 
 I got my LiDE 110/210 working that was connected to a Scientific Linux
 5.7 box. The following procedure was from about 14 months ago, so some
 part might not be current (but hopefully get you started).
 
 - Rebuild xsane 0.998
 - Rebuild sane-backends 1.0.19 (later version did not rebuild) - not good
 - Compile sane-backends 1.0.23 from git (tarball) [1] and
 manually copied genesys-related files from /usr/local/
 - At this point scanner was found by root but not by non-root
 - Edit /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules and change Mode from 0644 to 0666
 
 ACTION==add, SUBSYSTEM==usb_device, \
 PROGRAM=/bin/sh -c 'K=%k; K=$${K#usbdev}; printf
 bus/usb/%%03i/%%03i $${K.*} $${K#*.}', \
 NAME=%c, MODE=0666
 
 [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2011-July/028852.html
 
 Hope this helps,
 
 Akemi
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
   I can do all things through Christ 
  who strengthens me.
-- Philippians 4:13 ---
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Reorg of a RAID/LVM system

2013-02-28 Thread Harold Pritchett
I have a system with 4 disk drives, two 512 Gb and two 1 Tb.
It look like this:

CentOS release 5.9 (Final)

Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
Disk /dev/sdb: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
Disk /dev/sdc: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
Disk /dev/sdd: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
=

Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 969021 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes

Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *   11985 1000408+  fd  Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda219869923 4000752   82  Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda39924  969021   483385392   fd  Linux raid autodetect

Disk /dev/sdb: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdb1   *   1 125 1004031   fd  Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdb2 126 624 4008217+  82  Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sdb3 625  121601   971747752+  fd  Linux raid autodetect

Disk /dev/sdc: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdc1   *   1 125 1004031   fd  Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdc2 126409631897057+  82  Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sdc34097   60801   455482912+  fd  Linux raid autodetect

Disk /dev/sdd: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdd1   *   1 125 1004031   fd  Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdd2 126 624 4008217+  82  Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sdd3 625  121601   971747752+  fd  Linux raid autodetect

The four 1 GB partitions (sd[abcd]1) are configured as a RAID 1 array with a 
single ext4
filesystem mounted as /boot.

Swap is Swap...

the two smaller drives (sd[ac]3) partitions are configured as a RAID 1 array 
containing an LVM
physical volume (md1).  the two larger drives (sd[bd]3) are configured as a 
RAID 1 array
containing an LVM physical volume (md2).


# pvdisplay
   --- Physical volume ---
   PV Name   /dev/md1
   VG Name   vg0
   PV Size   434.38 GB / not usable 7.44 MB
   Allocatable   yes
   PE Size (KByte)   32768
   Total PE  13900
   Free PE   7810
   Allocated PE  6090
   PV UUID   z5QGpO-6bKP-k8xm-vUha-CWYj-dkjG-UaHAE5

   --- Physical volume ---
   PV Name   /dev/md2
   VG Name   vg0
   PV Size   926.73 GB / not usable 12.31 MB
   Allocatable   yes (but full)
   PE Size (KByte)   32768
   Total PE  29655
   Free PE   0
   Allocated PE  29655
   PV UUID   RIliNF-SENU-O2S9-Qo4H-rtOC-2Yzr-7jzuB0

The two physical volumes are defined as a single volume group.

# vgdisplay
   --- Volume group ---
   VG Name   vg0
   System ID
   Formatlvm2
   Metadata Areas2
   Metadata Sequence No  17
   VG Access read/write
   VG Status resizable
   MAX LV0
   Cur LV10
   Open LV   10
   Max PV0
   Cur PV2
   Act PV2
   VG Size   1.33 TB
   PE Size   32.00 MB
   Total PE  43555
   Alloc PE / Size   35745 / 1.09 TB
   Free  PE / Size   7810 / 244.06 GB
   VG UUID dKKD3L-pcHy-F8KQ-6qNX-vFye-tXdv-6Qs98W

One of the 512 Gb drives is failing.  What I want to do is to replace the
two 512 Gb drives with 3 Tb drives, expand the RAID array on them and then
expand the LVM PV contained therein.  This much I can do.

I then want to move all of the date from the other PV into this one, and remove
the second PV, RAID array, and the two 1 Tb drives, leaving me with two 3 Tb
drves, a large RAID array and a single PV containing everything (except the 
/boot
and SWAP partitions.)

What I'm not sure about is how to move the date from the second PV to the
first so I can then delete the contents of the drive and physically remove them
from the system leaving me with only the two 3 Tb drives.

Help!

Thanks

Harold



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Reorg of a RAID/LVM system

2013-02-28 Thread SilverTip257
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Harold Pritchett har...@uga.edu wrote:

 I have a system with 4 disk drives, two 512 Gb and two 1 Tb.
 It look like this:

 CentOS release 5.9 (Final)

 Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
 Disk /dev/sdb: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
 Disk /dev/sdc: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
 Disk /dev/sdd: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
 =

 ... snipped...


 One of the 512 Gb drives is failing.  What I want to do is to replace the
 two 512 Gb drives with 3 Tb drives, expand the RAID array on them and then
 expand the LVM PV contained therein.  This much I can do.


Make a backup.  You haven't said you did, but I won't go without saying it.
You're going to need a backup even _if_ you moving extents between PVs.


 I then want to move all of the date from the other PV into this one, and
 remove
 the second PV, RAID array, and the two 1 Tb drives, leaving me with two 3
 Tb
 drves, a large RAID array and a single PV containing everything (except
 the /boot
 and SWAP partitions.)

 What I'm not sure about is how to move the date from the second PV to the
 first so I can then delete the contents of the drive and physically remove
 them
 from the system leaving me with only the two 3 Tb drives.


You add your new PVs to the VG that your existing PVs are in.  Then run
pvmove [0] to migrate extents from the old PV to the new one.  There are a
couple of examples at the link I referenced.

[0]
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Cluster_Logical_Volume_Manager/online_relocation.html


 Help!

 Thanks

 Harold



 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



-- 
---~~.~~---
Mike
//  SilverTip257  //
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What can I do to UNDERSTAND why I can't reach centos.org (but everyone else can)?

2013-02-28 Thread Kahlil Hodgson
On 01/03/13 09:56, Les Mikesell wrote:
 Someone suggested I might be on a blacklist, somehow, and that, at least,
 would make technical sense.

 You could try checking something like

  http://multirbl.valli.org/

 to rule out blacklisting as the issue.

 The only blacklists I know about involve mail and require the
 receiving machines to actively choose to do lookups and reject based
 on the result.  Nothing should be dropping/blocking other types of
 traffic.

Very true. I thinking that if he _was_ on an email blacklist, then his 
network might _also_ have been flagged as bad (by something else). 
Because I didn't know about ...

 There are an assortment of 'looking glass' sites on the
 internet where you can originate traceroutes and check that BGP routes
 for source and targets are being propagated.
 This seems to be a directory of those sites: http://www.lookinglass.org/

Hey, that is very cool.  Did not know such a thing existed.

Thanks for pointing that out ;-)

K

-- 
Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson   GPG: C9A02289
Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382
DealMax Pty Ltd(w) +61 (0) 3 9008 5281

Suite 1415
401 Docklands Drive
Docklands VIC 3008 Australia

All parts should go together without forcing.  You must remember that
the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you.  Therefore,
if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason.  By all
means, do not use a hammer.  -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 in the making perhaps?

2013-02-28 Thread Sorin Srbu
 -Original Message-
 From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
 Behalf Of Johnny Hughes
 Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 6:46 PM
 To: CentOS mailing list
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 in the making perhaps?
 
  Is CentOS 6.4 brewing yet then? 8-)
 
 Eventually, yes ... thats how it goes, right?
 
 We are working on the consolidated tree, spinning isos, QA'ing those,
 etc.
 
 CR is for access now, for those what want it ... the tree should be
 along soon.  Not exactly sure when soon will be yet :)

Hey! We need an exact date!! ;-)

Nah, just kidding. It will be released when ready, right. I can wait. 

Keep up the good work dev-team!

-- 
/Sorin
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos