[CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:1449 Moderate CentOS 5 kernel Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1449 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1449.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
a4d3216439de530d2468961c4a61ce5cbd220ebad5dac650e5bc8944ec11d0dc
kernel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
58af2179222547220a1d40b1590fd0db4e68a02700035c4ca3bcf9e2142c86e2
kernel-debug-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
b92031e1a4a0f30ccc45704e9a2446a5ab1fb32c2f0ae69bc727beb1630b38c0
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
1ce6934b4070ee9520b04758109c92ffe172b54d46a4428225872fdf92796641
kernel-devel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
b37c616c9fa11bd497f1b5ddbf044a334920a50c9196c9cc7b65c6becc29a02d
kernel-doc-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.noarch.rpm
b63b5db3d7ad97682afc0ed8d2f84c2d17259bd5b99a4381ea3ac36aa32629e4
kernel-headers-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i386.rpm
eb76cfbe693caf4ec576b5a8a454c7ab5f696c5f1cb8c58751dc206d0890ff3c
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
fd8545968ea1dd6709019efdbcd420c35d8a9e3c4dbb97d68b71c7c8f53b2fcb
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
bf8dde7ca686728b2baa43fe60977cec426afb53d292aae63fab301b54cb7e58
kernel-xen-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
c8aed1fe661a60ceca8a4f7ab424f0e04a0b3d4e045607a9fede066d845c2eca
kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
x86_64:
fab32fb436d0476f3653c7383514016fc2c216a4553a4b3e0c5ccd1d4c7b4318
kernel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.x86_64.rpm
a5edb60b2c187cd68e226a75287f59f3a58a3c7c060031f1ed37f1c197340bea
kernel-debug-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.x86_64.rpm
8be7b0c728784683340b06c6b6143a97f8b30563fa01f7f665f569c88627301c
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.x86_64.rpm
72693349bc251745f015964df7be327d1ade06cb5b8a1574f67559b64706e5d6
kernel-devel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.x86_64.rpm
b37c616c9fa11bd497f1b5ddbf044a334920a50c9196c9cc7b65c6becc29a02d
kernel-doc-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.noarch.rpm
cd6ac0b3b3dcd547e5277094fa5b1d33df38fca0be6790ed270c2cb58e00144c
kernel-headers-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.x86_64.rpm
97a73c420767c33c3d0aefbf5af46ca0a88fa41b071bbb153bbad44b03e49d93
kernel-xen-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.x86_64.rpm
4a51b3b08a85cab68bed2ee0e60ccd45ed367c31ef58419dc3864c0548baf9ed
kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
fc5d4b1ef85ad875a112bffd8c4581ed5a2dce0beb0b3adcde5f0de652bef1c7
kernel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:1452 Moderate CentOS 5 vino Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1452 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1452.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
6f9e41d0b9e7dc36736a76d4e13e637faade333740eb51478580177461b631f7
vino-2.13.5-10.el5_10.i386.rpm
x86_64:
8e7bfa8d07c76eaa42d77c6e7b8433c500c9057e4b4b734c8e0bea9627c9eb98
vino-2.13.5-10.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
Source:
0b551da8a6bc208b7a764a224fd279ef10bdd74822b0a6694c6700c4c6f25096
vino-2.13.5-10.el5_10.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:1446 CentOS 6 mdadm Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1446
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1446.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
f4661f0efa2d95e39b4dfde5ceef7513f8bcdfebe063a28d5e087f1fbf9a8ac1
mdadm-3.2.5-4.el6_4.3.i686.rpm
x86_64:
a4d26721eeeae7cc403a91dbac6f12ce0488a8f2858bfb18167b6907763b4c12
mdadm-3.2.5-4.el6_4.3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
39ac296e7a8d96e476bce2296e04084d606ef7fdc8ebe6c14eefff629188aca1
mdadm-3.2.5-4.el6_4.3.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:1451 Critical CentOS 6 java-1.7.0-openjdk Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1451 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1451.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
0523ba78e4cb655ee6ef84ae0917fbe8519c30b8532c7996643741668f33c81f
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.2.el6_4.i686.rpm
7d465b4b2a4ef62fdad058fbd00cb9408b3d2157419791e81a52086dedc7cddd
java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.2.el6_4.i686.rpm
a7c8e25597c033da02556c2e22b730868131e6fd06d1351c4ea530e7bf60ebf3
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.2.el6_4.i686.rpm
ba19e6bbceb0deaaf83905c277063a0461d9c49c8a54a41e6b05419cdb93c0aa
java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.2.el6_4.noarch.rpm
6be4013c68bc6d46d40b50e4d4fcc045e40942a3e3e2edc7ce08aa2b31819f32
java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.2.el6_4.i686.rpm
x86_64:
d6e36e9d2be2d87cce5e89abb5d6bd092a8fb8c7a76f4259759502e434f50f46
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.2.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
9f29e741889cb9d9a343c5164d99e5cdf53b1213ac278b91dd736979433991c3
java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.2.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
b58786643115a9805f2c4a4446423491bab782b96ea663c032fc2a261ab11362
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.2.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
ba19e6bbceb0deaaf83905c277063a0461d9c49c8a54a41e6b05419cdb93c0aa
java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.2.el6_4.noarch.rpm
41793ba357142d47aa012374949d97a3c265a7009c1f10fb217dedd3ad370367
java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.2.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
Source:
5e43e18e1ef6b40bb49db615ca98c0b453ec1418a0175ce102a2f13af693ef82
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.2.el6_4.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:1445 CentOS 6 luci Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1445
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1445.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
c67604083fcc891846d95ea01f9460d3d3cf047ba9704d59b14a9e9b2d9db889
luci-0.26.0-37.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm
x86_64:
816504bfd75b9cded16ab180d0d23c7c98cc315ea643ab7cb068a61751ea6cf3
luci-0.26.0-37.el6.centos.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
4467c59799221052bddd487deb033021feb60c0965a3b8e44ef3557d0dec94d1
luci-0.26.0-37.el6.centos.1.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-es] [DNS] Problemas para resolucion directa :S !
Existe una herramienta en casi todos los posibles servicios de GNU/Linux
para chequear la configuración:
named-checkconf
named-checkzone
Con eso siempre podrán comprobar las configuraciones de bind9 y sus
archvios de zonas.
Saludos,
David
2013/10/22 angel jauregui darkdiabl...@gmail.com
Un maldito ; (punto y coma) que no habia puesto en el named.conf era lo
que fastidiaba todo :S...
Ya funciona la solucion interna, la externa no la he probado del todo
porque aun estoy haciendo mivimientos con los servers y me falta migrar el
apache a otro sitio, asi que... hasta entonces esto queda pendiente :D
Les dejo lo que puse en mis scripts, igual *repito NO* he probado la
resolucion externa (desde internet). Acepto criticas :D
*shell# cat /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf*
ddns-update-style interim;
ddns-updates on;
ddns-domainname midominio.com;
ddns-rev-domainname in-addr.arpa.;
ignore client-updates;
authoritative;
default-lease-time 600;
max-lease-time 7200;
option ip-forwarding off;
option domain-name midominio.com;
option ntp-servers 0.pool.ntp.org, 1.poo.ntp.org, 2.pool.ntp.org,
3.pool.ntp.org;
log-facility local7;
include /etc/rndc.key;
zone 1.0.10.in-addr.arpa. {
primary 127.0.0.1;
key rndc-key;
}
zone crver.net. {
primary 127.0.0.1;
key rndc-key;
}
shared-network midominiocom {
subnet 10.0.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
option routers 10.0.1.1;
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
option broadcast-address 10.0.1.255;
option domain-name-servers 10.0.1.1;
option netbios-name-servers 10.0.1.1;
range 10.0.1.100 10.0.1.150;
}
}
*shell# cat /etc/named.conf*
options { listen-on port 53 { any; }; listen-on-v6 port 53 { any; };
directory /var/named; dump-file /var/named/data/cache_dump.db;
statistics-file /var/named/data/named_stats.txt; memstatistics-file
/var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt; allow-query { any; }; forwarders {
8.8.8.8; 8.8.4.4; }; forward first; recursion yes;
bindkeys-file /etc/named.iscdlv.key; managed-keys-directory
/var/named/dynamic; }; include /etc/rndc.key; logging { channel
default_debug { file data/named.run; severity dynamic; }; category
lame-servers { null; }; }; controls { inet 127.0.0.1 allow { 127.0.0.1; }
keys { rndc-key; }; };
acl internals { 127.0.0.1; 10.0.1.0/24; }; acl externals { mi.ip.fi.ja; };
view internal { match-clients { internals; }; recursion yes; include
/etc/named.rfc1912.zones; include /etc/named.root.key; zone . IN {
type hint; file named.ca; }; zone midominio.com { type master; file
data/redlocal.zone; allow-update{ none; }; }; zone 1.0.10.in-addr.arpa
{ type master; file data/1.0.10.in-addr.arpa.zone; allow-update{ none; };
};
};
view external { match-clients { externals; }; recursion yes; zone . IN
{ type hint; file named.ca; }; zone midominio.com { type master; file
data/ext_redlocal.zone; allow-update{ none; }; };
zone miipfija.inver.tida.in-addr.arpa { type master; file data/
miipfija.inver.tida.in-addr.arpa.zone; allow-update{ none; }; };
};
Saludos !
2013/10/21 Yanis Guenane yguen...@gmail.com
Hola Angel,
Puedes ensenaros tres cosas :
1. El contenido de /etc/resolv.conf
2. La salida de dig db.midominio.com
3. La salida de dig db.midominio.com @10.0.0.1
Si 2 no funciona, pero 3 si, entonces tendrias que ver a la configuration
de tu /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf y asegurarte que tienes la linea
option domain-name-servers 10.0.0.1;
Saludos,
--
Yanis Guenane
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:42 AM, angel jauregui darkdiabl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Buenas.
Instale un equipo nuevo en el cual quiero colocar DNS, DHCP y Otros...
El DHCP ya asigna IPs y tambien asigna las estaticas a las MACs que
especifique.
El problema es el DNS, que no consigo una resolucion directa:
# resolucio inversa
*shell# host 10.0.1.2*
2.1.0.10.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer db.midominio.com.
2.1.0.10.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer smtp.midominio.com.
2.1.0.10.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer pop.midominio.com.
2.1.0.10.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer imap.midominio.com.
2.1.0.10.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer ftp.midominio.com.
2.1.0.10.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mail.midominio.com.
# resolucion directa
*shell# host db.midominio.com*
Host db.midominio.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Esta es mi configuracion de *named.conf*:
*shell# cat /etc/named.conf*
options {
listen-on port 53 { any; };
listen-on-v6 port 53 { any; };
directory /var/named;
dump-file /var/named/data/cache_dump.db;
statistics-file /var/named/data/named_stats.txt;
memstatistics-file /var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt;
allow-query { any; };
forwarders {
8.8.8.8;
[CentOS-es] servidor DNS
hola tengo configurado las zonas directas e inversas en mi servidor centos 6.4 con ip privada y publica de igual manera el dominio esta resgistrado pero no lo veo en internet,la ip que veo en internet es 165.98.197.116 de igual manera con esta misma lo tengo registrado para el dominio en namcheapdomains, la ip privada esta en 192.168.156.128, no tengo router instalado, los puertos 53 estan en open de igual manera esto lo ejecuto en maquina virtual vmware version 9.0.2 . en la maquina virtual la tarjeta que me da acceso internet esta configurada en NAT y la conectada a la red esta en vmnet3 ha espera de sus comentarios saludos cordiales ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] [Cisco] Ayuda con Etherchannel (VLAN)
He reseteado el cisco 2950 y repeti las configuraciones, verifique bien los pasos del manual ya mencionado y me resulto esto: Escenario: *DLink Switch* -- Todos los equipos de red y ServidorPrincial (Firewall/DNS/DHCP/Samba/NFS). *CISCO 2950 *-- tiene conectado solamente el Servidor Secundario (HTTP+MySQL+Postfix) [10.0.1.2]. *CISCO 2950* -- Puerto 23 y 24 van al Servidor Secundario, el puerto 1 esta conectado a un puerto del DLINK. *Servidor Secundario* -- tiene configuradas la eth0 y eth1 como esclavas de interfaz virtual bond0. Si conecto este servidor al DLINK todo marcha bien, pero al poner en el CISCO para usar Etherchannel, ya no responde :(. # estoy en mi laptop: 10.0.1.10, directo a DLink Switch # mi servidor 10.0.1.2 (http+ftp+mysql), directo a CISCO 2950 # *shell# telnet 10.0.1.254* Password: *Switch enable* Password: # entre a administracion Switch# *Switch# sh run* interface Port-channel1 switchport access vlan 2 switchport mode access flowcontrol send off ! interface FastEthernet0/23 switchport access vlan 2 switchport mode access channel-group 1 mode on ! interface FastEthernet0/24 switchport access vlan 2 switchport mode access channel-group 1 mode on ! interface Vlan2 ip address 10.0.1.2 255.255.255.0 no ip route-cache shutdown ! ip default-gateway 10.0.1.1 ip http server Switch# sh vlan ... 2VLAN0002 activePo1 ... Switch# sh etherchannel 1 port-channel Port-channels in the group: --- Port-channel: Po1 Age of the Port-channel = 0d:00h:28m:52s Logical slot/port = 1/0 Number of ports = 2 GC = 0x HotStandBy port = null Port state = Port-channel Ag-Inuse Protocol=- Ports in the Port-channel: Index Load Port EC stateNo of bits --+--+--+--+--- 0 00 Fa0/23 On/FEC 0 0 00 Fa0/24 On/FEC 0 Time since last port bundled:0d:00h:08m:28sFa0/24 Time since last port Un-bundled: 0d:00h:09m:30sFa0/24 # AQUI no veo la vlan2 ?? Switch# sh ip int brief | e down Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol Vlan1 10.0.1.254 YES manual up up FastEthernet0/1unassigned YES unset up up FastEthernet0/23 unassigned YES unset up up FastEthernet0/24 unassigned YES unset up up Port-channel1 unassigned YES unset up up Switch# write memory shell# ping 10.0.1.2 PING 10.0.1.2 (10.0.1.2) 56(84) bytes of data. From 10.0.1.10 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable Saludos ! El 22 de octubre de 2013 17:41, angel jauregui darkdiabl...@gmail.comescribió: Buenas. Conseguí un CISCO 2950 de 24 puertos y 2 Fibras. Quiero implementar etherchannel aprovechando que mi servidor cuenta con 2 tarjetas de red 10/100/1000. Como no se mucho al respecto sobre CISCO y su consola administracion, lo primero que realice fue resetear el router usando el manual oficinal de CISCO, despues accedi al portal del CISCO 2950, estableci mi password, abri el telnel, asigne IP al Switch CISCO (10.0.1.254) y conecte el puerto 1 con mi otro switch de la red lan (un DLINK). Conecte mi servidor (2 tarjetas) al switch CISCO, y pude realizar ping con exito. En el CentOS del servidor implemente bond0 como interfaz virtual que maneja a eth0 y eth1 (ambas esclavas de bond0). Verifique que mi servidor estuviera accesible y todo bien. Despues pase a configurar el CISCO 2950 pero aqui es donde no entiendo muy bien los comandos :S, vayas son muchos comandos que trae la consola como para bajarme un super manual. Me gustaria saber si alguien puede apoyarme con esto, ya que realice una configuracion basandome en este manual: http://journey4ccie.com/2013/05/01/etherchannel-between-linux-centos-and-cisco-switches-virtualbox-how-to/ Mi idea es tener el puerto 23 y 24 como etherchanel (vlan), pero al final de todo, no logro que funcione :(, cuando conecto mis interfaces a los puertos 23 y 24, mi servidor se vuelve inaccesible :( Ademas realice estos comandos y noto que se asigno la IP deseada :'( (10.0.1.2). *Switch# show vlan* VLAN Name StatusPorts - --- 1default activeFa0/1, Fa0/2, Fa0/3, Fa0/4, Fa0/5, Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8, Fa0/9, Fa0/10 Fa0/11, Fa0/12, Fa0/13, Fa0/14, Fa0/15, Fa0/16, Fa0/17, Fa0/18, Fa0/19 Fa0/20, Fa0/21, Fa0/22, Fa0/25, Fa0/26 10 VLAN0010 activePo1 1002 fddi-default act/unsup 1003 token-ring-default act/unsup 1004 fddinet-default act/unsup 1005 trnet-defaultact/unsup VLAN Type
Re: [CentOS-es] servidor DNS
A ver Ignacio quiza este tips nadie lo ha publicado hasta ahora en algun foro. Pero intentaré dar algunas ideas. El DNS o Domain Name Service se puede configurar optando por la compra de un dominio local (me refiero a dominio de pais en cuestion ej: .ar, .cu, .eu, .py) o un dominio de internet (.com, .net, .info). La adquisisción del 1er tipo se hace por medio de las oficinas NIC de cada país y el 2do tipo se puede hacer ya sea por medio de un Reseller o vendedores de dominios como Godaddy, etc... En todo caso la creación del dominio EXIGE que se apunten a DNS especificos: ej: ns1.dominio.com; ns2.dominio.com Donde ns1.dominio.com o ns2.dominio.com tienen que ser servidores DNS ya establecidos. Si yo compro: misuperdns.net y lo apunto a ns1.misuperdns.net y a ns2.misuperdns.net muy probablemente NO FUNCIONE, porque el dominio misuperdns.net NO ESTA REGISTRADO ANTES; en ese caso el que me vende el dominio debe darme la opcion de tranferencia de zona o apuntar los DNS a otros ya existentes donde yo pueda configurar mi zona. Eso indica que cuando yo haga: dig -t NS misuperdns.net La respuesta que me dará son: ns1.dominio.com ns2.dominio.com En tu caso ignacio creo que estás perdido en este paso. Yo te recomiendo que veas bien a que DNS estas apuntando tu nuevo dominio y salvo que el reseller o vendedor de dominio te lo permita no vale con le pongas el nombre del DNS que estás asignando en tu zona. Creo que deberás hacer una redirección de la zona a los ip de tu servidor o en todo caso usar otro DNS que si puedas apuntar a tu servidor. Saludos, David El 23 de octubre de 2013 14:08, Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.comescribió: hola tengo configurado las zonas directas e inversas en mi servidor centos 6.4 con ip privada y publica de igual manera el dominio esta resgistrado pero no lo veo en internet,la ip que veo en internet es 165.98.197.116 de igual manera con esta misma lo tengo registrado para el dominio en namcheapdomains, la ip privada esta en 192.168.156.128, no tengo router instalado, los puertos 53 estan en open de igual manera esto lo ejecuto en maquina virtual vmware version 9.0.2 . en la maquina virtual la tarjeta que me da acceso internet esta configurada en NAT y la conectada a la red esta en vmnet3 ha espera de sus comentarios saludos cordiales ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] servidor DNS
el 165.98.197.116 es el que esta apuntando en mi servidor local de DNS ns1.virtualempresa.com pero de igual manera me voy a la pagina network-tools no se muestra registro del mismo saludos El 23 de octubre de 2013 13:32, angel jauregui darkdiabl...@gmail.comescribió: *shell# host 165.98.197.116* 116.197.98.165.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer icable-CCOM-116.197.98.165.ibw.com.ni. Creo que tu IP Fijo lo estas pagando a tu compa~ia de cable (ISP) ??... En este caso debes pedir a tu compa~ia que te transfiera la zona o bien anexe tus configuraciones (poco probable y posible). *@David* Si mi dominio es miempresa.com , y tengo control completo sin intermediario de mi direccion IP Fija, no se supone que bastaria con que apunte el dominio a mi IP fija y por consiguiente los NameServers a: ns1.miempresa.com y ns2.miempresa.com ?? Saludos ! El 23 de octubre de 2013 13:35, David González Romero dgrved...@gmail.comescribió: A ver Ignacio quiza este tips nadie lo ha publicado hasta ahora en algun foro. Pero intentaré dar algunas ideas. El DNS o Domain Name Service se puede configurar optando por la compra de un dominio local (me refiero a dominio de pais en cuestion ej: .ar, .cu, .eu, .py) o un dominio de internet (.com, .net, .info). La adquisisción del 1er tipo se hace por medio de las oficinas NIC de cada país y el 2do tipo se puede hacer ya sea por medio de un Reseller o vendedores de dominios como Godaddy, etc... En todo caso la creación del dominio EXIGE que se apunten a DNS especificos: ej: ns1.dominio.com; ns2.dominio.com Donde ns1.dominio.com o ns2.dominio.com tienen que ser servidores DNS ya establecidos. Si yo compro: misuperdns.net y lo apunto a ns1.misuperdns.net y a ns2.misuperdns.net muy probablemente NO FUNCIONE, porque el dominio misuperdns.net NO ESTA REGISTRADO ANTES; en ese caso el que me vende el dominio debe darme la opcion de tranferencia de zona o apuntar los DNS a otros ya existentes donde yo pueda configurar mi zona. Eso indica que cuando yo haga: dig -t NS misuperdns.net La respuesta que me dará son: ns1.dominio.com ns2.dominio.com En tu caso ignacio creo que estás perdido en este paso. Yo te recomiendo que veas bien a que DNS estas apuntando tu nuevo dominio y salvo que el reseller o vendedor de dominio te lo permita no vale con le pongas el nombre del DNS que estás asignando en tu zona. Creo que deberás hacer una redirección de la zona a los ip de tu servidor o en todo caso usar otro DNS que si puedas apuntar a tu servidor. Saludos, David El 23 de octubre de 2013 14:08, Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.com escribió: hola tengo configurado las zonas directas e inversas en mi servidor centos 6.4 con ip privada y publica de igual manera el dominio esta resgistrado pero no lo veo en internet,la ip que veo en internet es 165.98.197.116 de igual manera con esta misma lo tengo registrado para el dominio en namcheapdomains, la ip privada esta en 192.168.156.128, no tengo router instalado, los puertos 53 estan en open de igual manera esto lo ejecuto en maquina virtual vmware version 9.0.2 . en la maquina virtual la tarjeta que me da acceso internet esta configurada en NAT y la conectada a la red esta en vmnet3 ha espera de sus comentarios saludos cordiales ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- M.S.I. Angel Haniel Cantu Jauregui. Celular: (011-52-1)-899-871-17-22 E-Mail: angel.ca...@sie-group.net Web: http://www.sie-group.net/ Cd. Reynosa Tamaulipas. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] servidor DNS
@David Aqui en mexico es un problema este proceso, ya que la delegacion de zona practicamente no es posible, aunque te COBRAN por la IP Fija, ellos simplemente se limita a ponerte un dominio acorde a ellos lo desean, no son ni para colocar tu dominio para que exista un reciprocidad entre la IP y el dominio a la hora de implementar SPF y que el rDNS de mas autenticidad a los mails. Saludos ! El 23 de octubre de 2013 20:25, David González Romero dgrved...@gmail.comescribió: Depende Angel... En Cuba por ejemplo, de donde soy, cuando se solicitaba un dominio .cu ellos te pedian cual seria el IP de tus DNS y los nombres, asi de esa forma ellos te hacian una delegación de zona para que tu te encargaras de todo. Aca en Paraguay, donde vivo ahora, cuando contratas un nombre en el NIC solo puedes ubicar nombre de servidores o en su defecto IP con nombres, pero previamente registrados esos nombres. La verdad algo que no logro entender porque la delegación de zonas es lo más sencillo que hay. Sin embargo para ellos poderlo hacer te exigen la contratación de un servicio de hosting :(... En fiun cada region tiene sus pro y contras... Saludos, David El 23 de octubre de 2013 16:32, angel jauregui darkdiabl...@gmail.com escribió: *shell# host 165.98.197.116* 116.197.98.165.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer icable-CCOM-116.197.98.165.ibw.com.ni. Creo que tu IP Fijo lo estas pagando a tu compa~ia de cable (ISP) ??... En este caso debes pedir a tu compa~ia que te transfiera la zona o bien anexe tus configuraciones (poco probable y posible). *@David* Si mi dominio es miempresa.com , y tengo control completo sin intermediario de mi direccion IP Fija, no se supone que bastaria con que apunte el dominio a mi IP fija y por consiguiente los NameServers a: ns1.miempresa.com y ns2.miempresa.com ?? Saludos ! El 23 de octubre de 2013 13:35, David González Romero dgrved...@gmail.comescribió: A ver Ignacio quiza este tips nadie lo ha publicado hasta ahora en algun foro. Pero intentaré dar algunas ideas. El DNS o Domain Name Service se puede configurar optando por la compra de un dominio local (me refiero a dominio de pais en cuestion ej: .ar, .cu, .eu, .py) o un dominio de internet (.com, .net, .info). La adquisisción del 1er tipo se hace por medio de las oficinas NIC de cada país y el 2do tipo se puede hacer ya sea por medio de un Reseller o vendedores de dominios como Godaddy, etc... En todo caso la creación del dominio EXIGE que se apunten a DNS especificos: ej: ns1.dominio.com; ns2.dominio.com Donde ns1.dominio.com o ns2.dominio.com tienen que ser servidores DNS ya establecidos. Si yo compro: misuperdns.net y lo apunto a ns1.misuperdns.net y a ns2.misuperdns.net muy probablemente NO FUNCIONE, porque el dominio misuperdns.net NO ESTA REGISTRADO ANTES; en ese caso el que me vende el dominio debe darme la opcion de tranferencia de zona o apuntar los DNS a otros ya existentes donde yo pueda configurar mi zona. Eso indica que cuando yo haga: dig -t NS misuperdns.net La respuesta que me dará son: ns1.dominio.com ns2.dominio.com En tu caso ignacio creo que estás perdido en este paso. Yo te recomiendo que veas bien a que DNS estas apuntando tu nuevo dominio y salvo que el reseller o vendedor de dominio te lo permita no vale con le pongas el nombre del DNS que estás asignando en tu zona. Creo que deberás hacer una redirección de la zona a los ip de tu servidor o en todo caso usar otro DNS que si puedas apuntar a tu servidor. Saludos, David El 23 de octubre de 2013 14:08, Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.com escribió: hola tengo configurado las zonas directas e inversas en mi servidor centos 6.4 con ip privada y publica de igual manera el dominio esta resgistrado pero no lo veo en internet,la ip que veo en internet es 165.98.197.116 de igual manera con esta misma lo tengo registrado para el dominio en namcheapdomains, la ip privada esta en 192.168.156.128, no tengo router instalado, los puertos 53 estan en open de igual manera esto lo ejecuto en maquina virtual vmware version 9.0.2 . en la maquina virtual la tarjeta que me da acceso internet esta configurada en NAT y la conectada a la red esta en vmnet3 ha espera de sus comentarios saludos cordiales ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- M.S.I. Angel Haniel Cantu Jauregui. Celular: (011-52-1)-899-871-17-22 E-Mail: angel.ca...@sie-group.net Web: http://www.sie-group.net/ Cd. Reynosa Tamaulipas.
Re: [CentOS-es] Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 82, Envío 29
Algo que no entiendo los switch cisco tiene una consola de administracion en la ip 192.168.1.254 que hay haces los vlans o dicha configuracion que creo que no tienes que entrar a telnet Enviado desde mi iPhone El 23/10/2013, a las 05:17 p.m., centos-es-requ...@centos.org escribió: Envíe los mensajes para la lista CentOS-es a centos-es@centos.org Para subscribirse o anular su subscripción a través de la WEB http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es O por correo electrónico, enviando un mensaje con el texto help en el asunto (subject) o en el cuerpo a: centos-es-requ...@centos.org Puede contactar con el responsable de la lista escribiendo a: centos-es-ow...@centos.org Si responde a algún contenido de este mensaje, por favor, edite la linea del asunto (subject) para que el texto sea mas especifico que: Re: Contents of CentOS-es digest Además, por favor, incluya en la respuesta sólo aquellas partes del mensaje a las que está respondiendo. Asuntos del día: 1. Re: [Cisco] Ayuda con Etherchannel (VLAN) (Pablo Alberto Flores) 2. servidor DNS (Ignacio Ordeñana) 3. Re: [Cisco] Ayuda con Etherchannel (VLAN) (angel jauregui) 4. Re: servidor DNS (David González Romero) 5. Re: servidor DNS (angel jauregui) 6. Re: servidor DNS (Ignacio Ordeñana) -- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:42:20 -0300 From: Pablo Alberto Flores pabfl...@uchile.cl Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] [Cisco] Ayuda con Etherchannel (VLAN) To: centos-es@centos.org Message-ID: CAM8zgGyb9OdyqE1v_N9_rvWso0gSExKxf5OBkVDBzoR1w=g...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Esta interesante tu propuesta. justamente tengo un linux para jugar y un 2950 en observacion. voy a ver como me va y te comento. te cuento que primero le actualizare el IOS al switch. estamos al habla El 22 de octubre de 2013 19:41, angel jaureguidarkdiabl...@gmail.comescribió: Buenas. Conseguí un CISCO 2950 de 24 puertos y 2 Fibras. Quiero implementar etherchannel aprovechando que mi servidor cuenta con 2 tarjetas de red 10/100/1000. Como no se mucho al respecto sobre CISCO y su consola administracion, lo primero que realice fue resetear el router usando el manual oficinal de CISCO, despues accedi al portal del CISCO 2950, estableci mi password, abri el telnel, asigne IP al Switch CISCO (10.0.1.254) y conecte el puerto 1 con mi otro switch de la red lan (un DLINK). Conecte mi servidor (2 tarjetas) al switch CISCO, y pude realizar ping con exito. En el CentOS del servidor implemente bond0 como interfaz virtual que maneja a eth0 y eth1 (ambas esclavas de bond0). Verifique que mi servidor estuviera accesible y todo bien. Despues pase a configurar el CISCO 2950 pero aqui es donde no entiendo muy bien los comandos :S, vayas son muchos comandos que trae la consola como para bajarme un super manual. Me gustaria saber si alguien puede apoyarme con esto, ya que realice una configuracion basandome en este manual: http://journey4ccie.com/2013/05/01/etherchannel-between-linux-centos-and-cisco-switches-virtualbox-how-to/ Mi idea es tener el puerto 23 y 24 como etherchanel (vlan), pero al final de todo, no logro que funcione :(, cuando conecto mis interfaces a los puertos 23 y 24, mi servidor se vuelve inaccesible :( Ademas realice estos comandos y noto que se asigno la IP deseada :'( (10.0.1.2). *Switch# show vlan* VLAN Name StatusPorts - --- 1default activeFa0/1, Fa0/2, Fa0/3, Fa0/4, Fa0/5, Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8, Fa0/9, Fa0/10 Fa0/11, Fa0/12, Fa0/13, Fa0/14, Fa0/15, Fa0/16, Fa0/17, Fa0/18, Fa0/19 Fa0/20, Fa0/21, Fa0/22, Fa0/25, Fa0/26 10 VLAN0010 activePo1 1002 fddi-default act/unsup 1003 token-ring-default act/unsup 1004 fddinet-default act/unsup 1005 trnet-defaultact/unsup VLAN Type SAID MTU Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2 - -- - -- -- -- -- 1enet 11 1500 - - ---0 0 10 enet 100010 1500 - - ---0 0 1002 fddi 101002 1500 - - ---0 0 1003 tr101003 1500 - - ---0 0 1004 fdnet 101004 1500 - - -ieee -0 0 1005 trnet 101005 1500 - - -ibm -0 0 Remote SPAN VLANs -- Primary Secondary Type Ports
Re: [CentOS-es] servidor DNS
Que extraño lo que ambos cuentan... Mi experienza se limita a 3 casos, pero en los 3 tenia el recurso de delegar el dominio a otros dns servers Estoy seguro de que si lo buscas bien vas a poder delegar el dns a tus propios servers Recuerden, cuando se delega una zona no solo es importante poner el record NS para el dominio, lo cual se hace con nombres, si el nombre de los dns es en el mismo dominio entonces necesitas registrar lad ip de los servidores dns (glue records) de otra forma es el cuento del huevo y la gallina Cu Roger Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] which kernel do people use?
On 10/22/2013 09:44 PM, Keith Keller wrote: I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you use on your CentOS machines? Not which version of the CentOS kernel, but which repository. Here are some examples I can think of off the top of my head: ==CentOS stock ==build own from CentOS SRPMs ==kernel-ml (from ELRepo) ==kernel-lt (from ELRepo) ==OpenVZ kernel ==build own from kernel.org ==other? I have a two CentOS systems. * A fanless VIA C6 system which provides network and telephony services on my home network. I use the stock kernel on this system. * A Thecus N5550 NAS. I use kernel-ml from ELRepo (along with a couple of hardware-specific modules for GPIO LED setup). I use the one- shot LED triggers for drive activity LEDs, and they weren't added until sometime after kernel 3.0. -- Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com Sometimes there's nothing left to do but crash and burn...or die trying. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] htdocs on NFS share / any pitfalls?
Am 23.10.2013 um 07:52 schrieb James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca: | i have a new setup where the htdocs directory for the webserver | is located on a nfs share. Client has cachefilesd configured. | Compared to the old setup (htdocs directory is on the local disk) | the performance is not so gratifying. The disk is faster compared | to the ethernet link but the cache should at least compensate this | a bit. Do they exist more pitfalls for such configurations? | The best thing to do with respect to NFS shares is to make extensive use of caching in front of the web servers. This will hide the latencies that the NFS protocol will bring. You can try to scale NFS through use of channel bonding or pNFS/Gluster but setting up a reverse proxy or memcached instance is going to be your best bet to making the system perform well. All web-frontends (multiple) have the filesystem caching already in place (bottom layer). The application uses a key-value-store in memory (top layer) to accelerate the webapp (php). Nevertheless the performance is not satisfying. I was looking at some caching by the httpd daemon (middle layer). Any experiences with such apache cache out there? Thanks -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] which kernel do people use?
Op 23-10-13 08:00, Ian Pilcher schreef: On 10/22/2013 09:44 PM, Keith Keller wrote: I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you use on your CentOS machines? Not which version of the CentOS kernel, but which repository. Here are some examples I can think of off the top of my head: ==CentOS stock ==build own from CentOS SRPMs ==kernel-ml (from ELRepo) ==kernel-lt (from ELRepo) ==OpenVZ kernel ==build own from kernel.org ==other? I have a two CentOS systems. * A fanless VIA C6 system which provides network and telephony services on my home network. I use the stock kernel on this system. * A Thecus N5550 NAS. I use kernel-ml from ELRepo (along with a couple of hardware-specific modules for GPIO LED setup). I use the one- shot LED triggers for drive activity LEDs, and they weren't added until sometime after kernel 3.0. stock. on some laptops fn-keys do not work -- that's no reason to deflect from default I think on 3 laptops I have to use nomodeset sometimes I have to replace the wireless cards, don't know if other kernels would remedy that. Greetings, J. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] which kernel do people use?
Kernel-lt on my personal server. There was some incompatibility between FreeBSD 9 and KVM with the stock kernel. Everything else is EL stock. On 23 October 2013 10:15, Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be wrote: Op 23-10-13 08:00, Ian Pilcher schreef: On 10/22/2013 09:44 PM, Keith Keller wrote: I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you use on your CentOS machines? Not which version of the CentOS kernel, but which repository. Here are some examples I can think of off the top of my head: ==CentOS stock ==build own from CentOS SRPMs ==kernel-ml (from ELRepo) ==kernel-lt (from ELRepo) ==OpenVZ kernel ==build own from kernel.org ==other? I have a two CentOS systems. * A fanless VIA C6 system which provides network and telephony services on my home network. I use the stock kernel on this system. * A Thecus N5550 NAS. I use kernel-ml from ELRepo (along with a couple of hardware-specific modules for GPIO LED setup). I use the one- shot LED triggers for drive activity LEDs, and they weren't added until sometime after kernel 3.0. stock. on some laptops fn-keys do not work -- that's no reason to deflect from default I think on 3 laptops I have to use nomodeset sometimes I have to replace the wireless cards, don't know if other kernels would remedy that. Greetings, J. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] which kernel do people use?
If you want SSD + MDRAID you need to use a 3.8+ kernel to have TRIM. The speed difference between the stock 2.6.32 - 3.10 kernel with SSD + MDRAID is insane. On 23 October 2013 10:23, Andrew Holway andrew.hol...@gmail.com wrote: Kernel-lt on my personal server. There was some incompatibility between FreeBSD 9 and KVM with the stock kernel. Everything else is EL stock. On 23 October 2013 10:15, Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be wrote: Op 23-10-13 08:00, Ian Pilcher schreef: On 10/22/2013 09:44 PM, Keith Keller wrote: I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you use on your CentOS machines? Not which version of the CentOS kernel, but which repository. Here are some examples I can think of off the top of my head: ==CentOS stock ==build own from CentOS SRPMs ==kernel-ml (from ELRepo) ==kernel-lt (from ELRepo) ==OpenVZ kernel ==build own from kernel.org ==other? I have a two CentOS systems. * A fanless VIA C6 system which provides network and telephony services on my home network. I use the stock kernel on this system. * A Thecus N5550 NAS. I use kernel-ml from ELRepo (along with a couple of hardware-specific modules for GPIO LED setup). I use the one- shot LED triggers for drive activity LEDs, and they weren't added until sometime after kernel 3.0. stock. on some laptops fn-keys do not work -- that's no reason to deflect from default I think on 3 laptops I have to use nomodeset sometimes I have to replace the wireless cards, don't know if other kernels would remedy that. Greetings, J. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] which kernel do people use?
wwp wrote: On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:44:44 -0700 Keith Keller kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote: I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you use on your CentOS machines? Not which version of the CentOS kernel, but which repository. Here are some examples I can think of off the top of my head: ==CentOS stock ==build own from CentOS SRPMs ==kernel-ml (from ELRepo) ==kernel-lt (from ELRepo) ==OpenVZ kernel ==build own from kernel.org ==other? stock, latest available. But it doesn't fully support my Dell Latitude E6530 hardware (webcam and some Dell Fn keys), so I'm interested in your poll! I almost always use the latest stock kernel, with one memorable exception. I had a laptop which would not boot until I unplugged it and removed the battery. The reason was a faulty mouse driver, and the fix was to remove the mouse driver module prior to shutdown. The problem was that the mouse driver was compiled into the kernel. So I used the SRPM, changed the option to install the mouse driver as a module and recompiled. Following the directions on the Centos wiki was pretty easy. c ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] which kernel do people use?
On 10/23/2013 03:44 PM, Keith Keller wrote: Hi all, I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you use on your CentOS machines? Not which version of the CentOS kernel, but which repository. Here are some examples I can think of off the top of my head: ==CentOS stock I use stock for most installs, always latest patch level. Exception is an ASUS laptop that I occasionally use an ELRepo kernel on to test out the various function key support, I have a number of backported drivers from these later kernels to enable the backlit keyboard etc on the stock kernels - with the kabi (?) kernel tracking, once these drivers are created they then work with the stock kernel + patched updates i.e. 6.3 to 6.4. ==build own from CentOS SRPMs ==kernel-ml (from ELRepo) ==kernel-lt (from ELRepo) ==OpenVZ kernel ==build own from kernel.org ==other? One reason I'm curious is that on occasion there are features that I would like to have from a newer kernel (e.g., --want-replacement from md) that (AFAICT) are not in the stock CentOS kernel. I've been using kernel-ml for these but am curious what other folks do in these situations, or whether people default to a different kernel for whatever reason. (And as an aside, who remembers when moving even from, say, a 1.2 to a 1.4 kernel, was an enormous amount of effort? I'm so old. Now anybody can go from a 2.6 to a 3.11 kernel in less than ten minutes!) --keith ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] which kernel do people use?
Am 23.10.2013 um 04:44 schrieb Keith Keller kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us: Hi all, I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you use on your CentOS machines? stock on servers centos-plus on workstations -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] which kernel do people use?
On 23/10/13 03:44, Keith Keller wrote: Hi all, I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you use on your CentOS machines? Not which version of the CentOS kernel, but which repository. Here are some examples I can think of off the top of my head: ==CentOS stock I use the latest stock kernel and then use kmod packages from elrepo to update individual drivers as needed to provide improved hardware support or functionality. It's the best of both worlds - I get the stability of the distro kernel with the additional hardware support/functionality I need. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 104, Issue 10
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2013:1447 Important CentOS 5 java-1.7.0-openjdk Update
(Johnny Hughes)
2. CESA-2013:1449 Moderate CentOS 5 kernel Update (Johnny Hughes)
3. CESA-2013:1452 Moderate CentOS 5 vino Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 07:41:01 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:1447 Important CentOS 5
java-1.7.0-openjdk Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20131022074101.ga25...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1447 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1447.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
fb118d428dac9add2e94bde4f61e13c4a795079a1579c3e875ab0b50a9482a06
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10.i386.rpm
22fa5e6cc950f326aa97ab39b5afa29a5ff381ab628b54c11722c9a955feab2d
java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10.i386.rpm
671774e11385e6d2a48b4404396f4aa10ed1fb1e2ba2169bbc5285b13fb6083f
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10.i386.rpm
d52f06e0db180855025068c5bd82d6cf0de711405b15bf3e7d370725355fd7b3
java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10.i386.rpm
beb4cb7825621519fbb31246a68b02b7a3ce97756a111463fcc4c316bc3d3f8c
java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10.i386.rpm
x86_64:
591b8dcdc1295536cbd692b7b420787774645600409926050915d9b04e594f8e
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
5ea0df10f435a54548ba4537c246407f065a1d7af6e550b6657cd3450e671405
java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
ee3ce55ada00a909bd512bfc63b8b8e217da9007b5707ff2f8a70054f736ed32
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
f224698988353e0b11eb174e0a850f577a8542c27026fb255621bb93026f84ea
java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
dc36c44b883491715f46af01054727a2becd755ad9402de76402a32c74ee1280
java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
Source:
2f33521ebb7211a1d0afba63747604697e0d6061c8962aee72cff1bfc0ff71de
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:10:49 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:1449 Moderate CentOS 5 kernel
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20131023001049.ga9...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1449 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1449.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
a4d3216439de530d2468961c4a61ce5cbd220ebad5dac650e5bc8944ec11d0dc
kernel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
58af2179222547220a1d40b1590fd0db4e68a02700035c4ca3bcf9e2142c86e2
kernel-debug-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
b92031e1a4a0f30ccc45704e9a2446a5ab1fb32c2f0ae69bc727beb1630b38c0
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
1ce6934b4070ee9520b04758109c92ffe172b54d46a4428225872fdf92796641
kernel-devel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
b37c616c9fa11bd497f1b5ddbf044a334920a50c9196c9cc7b65c6becc29a02d
kernel-doc-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.noarch.rpm
b63b5db3d7ad97682afc0ed8d2f84c2d17259bd5b99a4381ea3ac36aa32629e4
kernel-headers-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i386.rpm
eb76cfbe693caf4ec576b5a8a454c7ab5f696c5f1cb8c58751dc206d0890ff3c
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
fd8545968ea1dd6709019efdbcd420c35d8a9e3c4dbb97d68b71c7c8f53b2fcb
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
bf8dde7ca686728b2baa43fe60977cec426afb53d292aae63fab301b54cb7e58
kernel-xen-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
c8aed1fe661a60ceca8a4f7ab424f0e04a0b3d4e045607a9fede066d845c2eca
kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.i686.rpm
x86_64:
fab32fb436d0476f3653c7383514016fc2c216a4553a4b3e0c5ccd1d4c7b4318
kernel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.x86_64.rpm
a5edb60b2c187cd68e226a75287f59f3a58a3c7c060031f1ed37f1c197340bea
kernel-debug-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.x86_64.rpm
8be7b0c728784683340b06c6b6143a97f8b30563fa01f7f665f569c88627301c
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.x86_64.rpm
72693349bc251745f015964df7be327d1ade06cb5b8a1574f67559b64706e5d6
kernel-devel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5.x86_64.rpm
Re: [CentOS] which kernel do people use?
On 10/23/2013 04:44 AM, Keith Keller wrote: Hi all, I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you use on your CentOS machines? Not which version of the CentOS kernel, but which repository. I use centos-plus on all machines ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] which kernel do people use?
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 03:55:45PM +0200, Jitse Klomp wrote: On 10/23/2013 04:44 AM, Keith Keller wrote: Hi all, I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you use on your CentOS machines? Not which version of the CentOS kernel, but which repository. Stock on servers and elrepo on laptops (mostly for HW support). Mihai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] htdocs on NFS share / any pitfalls?
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 23.10.2013 um 07:52 schrieb James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca: | i have a new setup where the htdocs directory for the webserver | is located on a nfs share. Client has cachefilesd configured. | Compared to the old setup (htdocs directory is on the local disk) | the performance is not so gratifying. The disk is faster compared | to the ethernet link but the cache should at least compensate this | a bit. Do they exist more pitfalls for such configurations? | The best thing to do with respect to NFS shares is to make extensive use of caching in front of the web servers. This will hide the latencies that the NFS protocol will bring. You can try to scale NFS through use of channel bonding or pNFS/Gluster but setting up a reverse proxy or memcached instance is going to be your best bet to making the system perform well. All web-frontends (multiple) have the filesystem caching already in place (bottom layer). The application uses a key-value-store in memory (top layer) to accelerate the webapp (php). Nevertheless the performance is not satisfying. I was looking at some caching by the httpd daemon (middle layer). Any experiences with such apache cache out there? What kind of throughput and latency are you talking about here? NFS shouldn't add that much overhead to reads compared to disk head latency and if you enable client caching might be considerably faster. If you are writing over NFS you don't get the same options, though and sync mounts are going to be slow. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] which kernel do people use?
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Keith Keller kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote: Hi all, I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you use on your CentOS machines? Not which version of the CentOS kernel, but which repository. Here are some examples I can think of off the top of my head: I'm running CentOS-plus on my main workstation but multiple VMs run a custom kernel built from the CentOS SRPMS. I have two systems running CentOS with the upstream vanilla kernel, but these don't get much use. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] which kernel do people use?
Am 23.10.2013 04:44, schrieb Keith Keller: Hi all, I'm doing a very informal and unscientific poll: which kernel do you use on your CentOS machines? Not which version of the CentOS kernel, but which repository. CentOS Plus and Oracle UEK2. Regards Peter -- Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge, enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world, not so the world can see you.-- David McCullough Jr. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] baby blue screen of permanent death
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, John R Pierce wrote: On 10/22/2013 2:24 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: How do I change passwords on an install, e.g. my F14, into which I cannot login? I can edit the files from either Knoppix or from a CentoS terminal. edit /mnt/.../etc/shadow and delete the password hash between the first two :'s, so it looks like username::. That worked after I also deleted the x from passwd. I still do not know how to fix anything. From my point of view it just stops for no apparent reason. I forgot to edit the kernal line the last time I boot centos, but if the output oof dmesg is an indication, it got a bit further this time: ip6_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 (16384 buckets, 65536 max) ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team e100 :02:08.0: eth0: NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready p4-clockmod: P4/Xeon(TM) CPU On-Demand Clock Modulation available RPC: Registered named UNIX socket transport module. RPC: Registered udp transport module. RPC: Registered tcp transport module. RPC: Registered tcp NFSv4.1 backchannel transport module. SELinux: initialized (dev rpc_pipefs, type rpc_pipefs), uses genfs_contexts eth0: no IPv6 routers present 802.1Q VLAN Support v1.8 Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com All bugs added by David S. Miller da...@redhat.com SELinux: initialized (dev autofs, type autofs), uses genfs_contexts SELinux: initialized (dev autofs, type autofs), uses genfs_contexts SELinux: initialized (dev autofs, type autofs), uses genfs_contexts eth0: no IPv6 routers present Bridge firewalling registered tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6 tun: (C) 1999-2004 Max Krasnyansky m...@qualcomm.com device virbr0-nic entered promiscuous mode virbr0: starting userspace STP failed, starting kernel STP Ebtables v2.0 registered SELinux: initialized (dev mqueue, type mqueue), uses transition SIDs SELinux: initialized (dev proc, type proc), uses genfs_contexts SELinux: initialized (dev mqueue, type mqueue), uses transition SIDs lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions SELinux: initialized (dev proc, type proc), uses genfs_contexts The SELinux line is new. Is there somewhere I can put print statements to try to figure out what is going on? -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu On Monday, I'm gonna have to tell my kindergarten class, whom I teach not to run with scissors, that my fiance ran me through with a broadsword. -- Lily ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Should I upgrade Samba 3.6 to Samba 4.1
Hi, I just installed Samba on my Centos 6.4 computer. Smbstatus says my version is 3.6.9-151.el6-4.1. My smb.conf file only has a [global] and [homes] section. My configuration works, as expected, from a Win7 Virtual Box computer and a Win8 Virtual Box computer. I can see the share from the Windows file explorer and can map the share to a network drive. The Samba server is not virtual. The problem is my wife's Win7 laptop which is running some sort of home edition of Win7. I did everything I could in control panel to enable file sharing but I still can't see the Samba share. I can ping the computer running Samba? I tried to launch gpedit.msc but this program was not there. Do you think it would work if I upgraded Samba to the latest version 4.1? Should I consider upgrading to Win7 professional? Thank you, Joe Hesse ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Should I upgrade Samba 3.6 to Samba 4.1
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 04:19:21PM -0500, Joseph Hesse wrote: Do you think it would work if I upgraded Samba to the latest version 4.1? Should I consider upgrading to Win7 professional? I believe win7 home only supports simple file sharing, which precludes its ability for mounting real shares. If this is indeed true you will likely need to upgrade to win7 pro or premium. John -- Never, never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well-being of a person or animal is at stake. Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way. -- Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968), civil-rights leader pgpSXHd6c1dnZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Should I upgrade Samba 3.6 to Samba 4.1
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Joseph Hesse joehe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I just installed Samba on my Centos 6.4 computer. Smbstatus says my version is 3.6.9-151.el6-4.1. My smb.conf file only has a [global] and [homes] section. My configuration works, as expected, from a Win7 Virtual Box computer and a Win8 Virtual Box computer. I can see the share from the Windows file explorer and can map the share to a network drive. The Samba server is not virtual. The problem is my wife's Win7 laptop which is running some sort of home edition of Win7. I did everything I could in control panel to enable file sharing but I still can't see the Samba share. I can ping the computer running Samba? I tried to launch gpedit.msc but this program was not there. Do you think it would work if I upgraded Samba to the latest version 4.1? Should I consider upgrading to Win7 professional? I have a Windows machine that says Windows7 Home Premium. There is no problem seeing / accessing Samba shares from there. Samba is 3.x. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Should I upgrade Samba 3.6 to Samba 4.1
Chances are there is firewall software on the laptop blocking it. Mike On 10/23/2013 05:19 PM, Joseph Hesse wrote: Hi, I just installed Samba on my Centos 6.4 computer. Smbstatus says my version is 3.6.9-151.el6-4.1. My smb.conf file only has a [global] and [homes] section. My configuration works, as expected, from a Win7 Virtual Box computer and a Win8 Virtual Box computer. I can see the share from the Windows file explorer and can map the share to a network drive. The Samba server is not virtual. The problem is my wife's Win7 laptop which is running some sort of home edition of Win7. I did everything I could in control panel to enable file sharing but I still can't see the Samba share. I can ping the computer running Samba? I tried to launch gpedit.msc but this program was not there. Do you think it would work if I upgraded Samba to the latest version 4.1? Should I consider upgrading to Win7 professional? Thank you, Joe Hesse ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
