Re: [CentOS] Build one VM with two 5.7 DVD iso

2012-04-10 Thread Michel Daggelinckx
Op 10-04-12 18:36, Vinay Nagrik schreef:
 Hello Group,

 I am trying to build one VMware VM for 5.7 centos.  However, there are two
 DVDs.  And all vms I have build so far are confined in one iso.

 How could I build complete 5.7 centos VM with two different Centos DVDs.

 I am sure somebody out there must have built one such OS.

 Please guild.

 thanks.

 nagrik
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

I do it this way in virtualbox.

When the installer asks for the next disk i eject the first from the 
VM and load the second.

Michel

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Linux on touch screen device

2012-03-30 Thread Michel Daggelinckx
check out http://www.redsleeve.org/

RHEL 6 for ARM



Op 30-03-12 07:51, 夜神 岩男 schreef:

 --- On Fri, 2012/3/30, Nataraj incoming-cen...@rjl.com wrote:

 I have poked around in google and have seen a number of youtube videos,
 but my question is whether anyone really has linux running on any kind
 of tablet or tablet PC device in such a way that the touch screen can be
 used productively and it won't take a month to get it running? 
 Initially the two applications that are of most interest to me would be
 a good web browser (maybe chromium) and thunderbird.  I would also like
 to have a decent on screen keyboard which could be used to ssh to
 servers in an emergency.

 I've seen instructions for booting linux on various devices, but many
 people doing this are using keyboards and not touchscreens.

 Do applications like thunderbird have to be modified in order to work
 well with a touch screen or is just getting a working driver for the
 touchpad sufficient?

 If anyone has any experience with this I would appreciate knowing what
 hardware your running on and what linux distro/desktop environment you
 use.  I've been interested in devices like the ASUS EP121 which is a
 dual core I5, so it wouldn't be necessary to have an ARM distribution. 
 Also the newest Asus transformer prime (arm) which I think is about 2
 months away sounds interesting.
 Lots of people do this and lots of (most?) commercial tablet/smartphone 
 systems are based on Linux or a close cousin (Android and iOS come to 
 mind...).

 As far as non-commercial DIY tablet distros, there are distros and special 
 interest groups within larger distros that focus on this type of deployment.

 But none of them are CentOS, so I'm not sure why you pinged this mailinglist 
 -- though I think you'd probably find that CentOS installs just fine in most 
 cases, just remember to build whatever graphcs driver you need or your 
 experience might not be good.

 Go ask over at Fedora, Ubuntu and maybe Mint. Also check out MeeGo and 
 whatnot.

 As a side note, there is nothing magical about a touchscreen. Touchscreens 
 are just pointing devices like mice and touchpads as far as Linux is 
 concerned, but in this case it is a touchpad that you can see through to a 
 screen on the other side (there is a special case of location logic, of 
 course, so the pointer doesn't continue from last location, but this is a 
 normal case handled by X). So nothing special happens in an application to 
 make it work with a touchscreen because a touchscreen is just creating 
 mouse events the same way your normal mouse would do. The only problem with 
 touchscreens is that small icons are smaller than your finger (well, mine 
 anyway) and so you have to make the desktop a little cartoony to make things 
 work right. Gnome Shell in Fedora is actually not too bad to use with a 
 touchscreen, though it sucks horribly with a mouse IMO, and KDE with large 
 widgets is pretty easy as well.

 -IY
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] URL of website doesn't point anymore to CentOS/Drupal installation

2009-05-16 Thread Michel Daggelinckx
mic...@michel:~/test$ wget http://digifreedom.net
--2009-05-17 00:45:37--  http://digifreedom.net/
Resolving digifreedom.net... failed: Name or service not known.
wget: unable to resolve host address `digifreedom.net'
mic...@michel:~/test$ wget http://www.digifreedom.net/
--2009-05-17 00:46:24--  http://www.digifreedom.net/
Resolving www.digifreedom.net... failed: Name or service not known.
wget: unable to resolve host address `www.digifreedom.net'
mic...@michel:~/test$ 





Op zondag 17-05-2009 om 00:36 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef M. Fioretti:
 sorry for the vague subject, but I couldn't find a better one.
 
 I have the website http://digifreedom.net running on a Centos 4 VPS
 with Apache and Drupal 6.10 . This is a multisite Drupal setup: only
 one installation, with subdirectories in sites/, and a separate mysql
 database for each website. For several reasons, I had setup DNS,
 drupal and everything to work without the www prefix on domain
 names. In other words, http://digifreedom.net is OK,
 www.digifreedom.net was never used.
 
 Everything worked perfectly for months, if not years. Five minutes
 ago, somebody wrote to me that a digifreedom.net URL I suggested him
 to read doesn't work.
 
 I checked, and what happens now is that, if I type
 http://digifreedom.net/node/82 the browser is immediately redirected
 to www.digifreedom.net/node/82, which (of course) returns an error
 message:
 
 Firefox can't find the server at www.digifreedom.net
 
 That error message is OK, because I had NOT set up DNS and apache to
 answer to that address. What I don't get is why http://digifreedom.net
 now becomes www.digifreedom.net. I haven't changed anything myself in
 DNS, drupal or apache config for many weeks, so why all of a sudden
 something started to behave differently?
 
 The weirdest thing is that this forced redirection from example.com
 to www.example.com happens with some, but not all of the other domains
 configured in the same way and running on the same server off the same
 Apache/Drupal installation!
 
 How can I find, at least, which piece of the puzzle is responsible for
 this problem? I am aware that probably this isn't even a centos issue,
 I just need a pointer in the right direction.
 
 TIA,
   Marco
 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...

2009-04-02 Thread Michel Daggelinckx
John R Pierce wrote:
 Jason Pyeron wrote:
   
 Can I get some recommendations:

 We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with  
   
 

 godaddy is a registrar, not a hosting service.they pretend to be the 
 latter, but seriously...


 i'd be looking for someone providing either VPS or dedicated servers.  
 you get root, you get to configure.  lots and lots of choices.


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

   
http://easyspeedy.com/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] live audio feed via telephone link

2009-03-30 Thread Michel Daggelinckx
John R Pierce wrote:
 Les Mikesell wrote:
   
 It sounds like this location is just begging for wimax or some other 
 suitable internet service.  What kind of place can support a radio 
 station but not an internet presence these days?
   
 

 the original poster indicated the FM station was on an American Indian 
 reservation in a very remote canyon, and the ONLY phone lines available 
 were 2 pairs of LONG haul copper POTS lines, one currently used by the 
 stations telephone service, the other available for modem use.   They 
 are using a microwave link to get from the station to the hilltop 
 transmitter, but that the nearest 'real' town with a telephone CO that 
 would support any sort of real internet service is way too far away for 
 FM reception, even with a directional yagi.


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

   
http://www.wirelessantwerpen.be/28052003.htm
http://www.wirelessantwerpen.be/102km-link.htm

these pages are in dutch but maybe you can contact these guy's to see if
they can help with your problem.
they sucessfully made a 42KM wifi link and are going to try a 102KM link
with standard wifi gear and grid antenna's

i...@wirelessantwerpen.be

In the unlikely case they don't speak english i can translate for you

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS promotion

2009-02-09 Thread Michel Daggelinckx
I've been to FOSDEM this weekend and noticed the small number of CentOS
people at the booth.

The Ubuntu people work with Local Community Teams to support and promote
the distro.

I think it would be beneficial for CentOS to setup a similar structure.
At the moment it's mostly sysadmins who introduce/sneak CentOS into
businesses.
Local Community Teams can setup a booth at computer fairs and other
events. This way the general public (small businesses, non-profit
organisations, schools, ) are exposed to CentOS.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Internet threat management package

2007-10-04 Thread Michel Daggelinckx
take a look at OSSEC
http://www.ossec.net/


J schreef:
 ... Looking for a recommendation for a commercial threat management
 package.  ( Think antivirus / antispy / anti-rootkit -- all rolled
 into one engine ), similar to this product:
 http://usa.kaspersky.com/products_services/work-space-security.php,
 which currently only supports one kernel for FC6, and RHEL4, officially.

 Here's the background.  Need to make a decision and investment for a
 hybrid linux/windows network, with a Samba file server running
 Centos5.  Would like to invest a single product, rather than multiple
 products, especially since that implies that I'm not giving money to
 companies that only provide software for Windows.  (or, supporting
 companies that provide software solutions for Linux, depending on how
 you look at it.)

 Not even sure if I have the right idea.  I would assume that Linux
 clients are not completely invulnerable to virii, spyware, and
 rootkits, and that it would make sense, in a small corporate
 environment to guard against them, the same as Windows machines... but
 the lack of options seems to suggest otherwise?


 Anyone have any tips, advice, or recommendations?

 Thanks!!

 -- J.
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


-- 
Personally its not God I dislike, its his fan club I cant stand

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos