[CentOS] C7 minimal (1511) firewalld is not installed: logical?
I just installed a host with CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1511.iso It seems that firewalld is not included in the minimal set. I wonder why? If I recall correctly CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1503-01.iso did include it. And, this could be a very stupid question, am I running without a firewall or just without a way to control my firewall? Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network configuration issue with second public ip on CentOS 6
> Op 23 dec. 2015 om 18:31 heeft Valeri Galtsev het > volgende geschreven: > > >> > > If I understand IP networking correctly, you only can have "aliases" of > the interface appear on the _same_ network segment (I'm tempted to say > same class C network) as the main IP of interface, say you have: > > DEVICE=eth0 > IPADDR=x.y.z.w > NETMASK=255.255.255.0 > GATEWAY=x.y.z.254 > > Then with the restriction I mentioned you can have alias: > > DEVICE=eth0:0 > IPADDR=x.y.z.a > NETMASK=255.255.255.255 > > Note that "x.y.z." part is the same in both IPs. > > Somebody may correct me if I'm wrong. > > Valeri > >> >> I have used an 10. Alias on a 192. Interface so it is possible Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] libreoffice 4.4 or 5 in CentOS 6
Op 15-12-15 om 08:51 schreef wwp: Hello Patrick, On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 08:10:07 +0100 Patrick Bervoets wrote: [...] I don't think this list accepts screenshots, so I'll try to describe. The menu is a black rectangle, if you click somewhere you see the dropdown which is black with 1 or 2 menu-items in white. Toolbar is black with some buttons visible (some of them disappearing when moused-over). Dialog boxes have black buttons etc. All in all rather difficult to use. Do you run gnome? Maybe then this is a KDE thing. Maybe it's a desktop theme issue, did you try another one? IIRC there's a settings in LO to follow the desktop theme or not (or something approaching), that's something to check too. Changing the theme didn't help; neither was deselecting hardware acceleration and other option (btw I couldn't see the checkboxes, they looked like random graphic bits from another screen) The last time the background of the menubar and the toolbars was (a copy of) the ruler... Definitely random graphic hicups. I'll go for C7 if one day I'll have some time left :-s Thanks for helping. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] libreoffice 4.4 or 5 in CentOS 6
Op 14-12-15 om 22:09 schreef Johan Vermeulen: Op 14-dec.-2015 22:02 schreef Frank Cox: On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:43:54 +0100 Patrick Bervoets wrote: I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO 4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black). Anyone been able to use a higher version of LO? This won't help you much on Centos 6, but I use Libreoffice 5.0.3.2 on Centos 7 and it works fine. I just checked and the "Digital Signatures" tab exists and appears to be active on the PDF Export menu option, though I've not actually tried to use it myself. Does Libreoffice 5 not work on Centos 6? I've never tried that, either. Signing pdf's works on Centos7, LO4.2, tested with Belgian eid card. Never tried on Centos6. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~www.melvilletheatre.com ___ Do you guys work in gnome or KDE? (because I was wondering if this thing might be a KDE problem on C6) Johan, does LO 4.2 on C7 has a "digital signatures" tab in "export to pdf"? I don't see it in 4.2.8.2-11.el6 Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] libreoffice 4.4 or 5 in CentOS 6
Op 14-12-15 om 23:54 schreef Scott Robbins: On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:43:54PM +0100, Patrick Bervoets wrote: I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO 4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black). Anyone been able to use a higher version of LO? Yes, I easily installed libreoffice-5.x on my CentOS-6x box. I think all I did was download the tarball, go in the rpm directory and run rpm -ivh *rpm. This seems useful. http://www.tecmint.com/install-libreoffice-on-rhel-centos-fedora-debian-ubuntu-linux-mint/ That's what I did :-) Only I used yum, but that wouldn't make a difference, would it? I don't think this list accepts screenshots, so I'll try to describe. The menu is a black rectangle, if you click somewhere you see the dropdown which is black with 1 or 2 menu-items in white. Toolbar is black with some buttons visible (some of them disappearing when moused-over). Dialog boxes have black buttons etc. All in all rather difficult to use. Do you run gnome? Maybe then this is a KDE thing. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] libreoffice 4.4 or 5 in CentOS 6
I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO 4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black). Anyone been able to use a higher version of LO? Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Thunderbird 38.4.0 not offered, see it in packages, repomd outdated?
Hi, first: I did several yum clean all's :-) Thunderbird 38.4.0 is not offered. I see: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/updates/x86_64/Packages/thunderbird-38.4.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm - 27-Nov-2015 06:58 - 56M But: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/updates/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml - 18-Nov-2015 20:00 - 3.4K Shouldn't repomd also be updated or am I mistaken? Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Reboot updates.
Op 03-09-15 om 15:12 schreef Richard: If you're using centos-6 or -7 you can use the command "needs-restarting" (as root) to see what processes were effected by the updates and make your decision based on that. I've had mixed results in the past with needs-restarting; some hosts didn't report anything even if there were updates that needed a service to restart. As Reindl Harald suggested me off-list a while ago: lsof | grep DEL | grep /usr This gave me a more reliable view. Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] C6 HP lt4112 Gobi 4G Module
Anyone got an HP lt4112 Gobi 4G Module working in C6? Care to give me some pointers about how/where to begin? Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ntptrace ***Request timed out with stock C6 ntpd
Following the recent ntp posts I decided to check my setup with ntptrace. localhost: stratum 3, offset -0.20, synch distance 0.016330 81.95.117.62: timed out, nothing received ***Request timed out service ntpd status ntpd (pid 3018) is gestart... grep server /etc/ntp.conf | grep -v "#" server 0.centos.pool.ntp.org iburst server 1.centos.pool.ntp.org iburst server 2.centos.pool.ntp.org iburst server 3.centos.pool.ntp.org iburst ntpq> peer remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter == +85.234.199.227 193.190.230.65 2 u 135 1024 377 29.759 -0.218 48.373 *79.132.231.103 193.190.230.66 2 u 328 1024 377 41.639 1.487 12.891 +195.200.224.66 193.67.79.2022 u 958 1024 377 13.179 1.036 87.857 +81.95.117.62193.67.79.2022 u 343 1024 377 23.321 -1.759 24.933 I've tested on 3 C6 hosts and everyone gives a ***Request timed out. (everytime with an other host) Is there something wrong with my setup or with my testing? Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 server responding extremely slow on ssh interactive
Op 30-01-15 om 21:51 schreef Gordon Messmer: On 01/30/2015 12:32 PM, Patrick Bervoets wrote: Before - in december - I never experienced it. But it's a server I tend do leave alone, so I'm never very busy on a shell. Do you know what kernel you were running at the time? It might be useful to see if reverting to that revision changes the symptoms. IIRC before the problem: kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-504.el6 problem occured during kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-504.1.3.el6 actual kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-504.3.3.el6 But since there is already a new kernel waiting; I'm not sure what to do. I think I'll first upgrade & test. If my maintenance window permits I'll test downgrading (but 3 updates...) BTW I've got 3 other kvm-servers without this behavior (but they are completely different machines so not much to compare) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 server responding extremely slow on ssh interactive
Op 30-01-15 om 19:40 schreef Gordon Messmer: On 01/30/2015 01:21 AM, Patrick Bervoets wrote: iostat random sample "Random" is difficult to evaluate. Is that representative? Are sda, sdb, and sdc typically less than 1% utilized? Or are there large utilization values right after a hang? All the output was in the same scale and during a hang in an other shell. Does the time displayed by "atop" eventually catch up? Not that I know. But I gave up :-) Does the problem persist across reboots? Alas, one of the vm's is our production database. My next update/reboot window is next saturday. But I had the problem just before the last reboot (halfway january). But hadn't closely monitored it afterwards. Before - in december - I never experienced it. But it's a server I tend do leave alone, so I'm never very busy on a shell. Is this system running ntpd? yes Does the problem persist if you turn ntpd off and reboot? _ I'll check that next week. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 server responding extremely slow on ssh interactive
Op 30-01-15 om 10:29 schreef John R Pierce: On 1/30/2015 1:21 AM, Patrick Bervoets wrote: free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 48218 31895 16323 0 108 519 -/+ buffers/cache: 31267 16951 Swap: 7951476 7475 thats an unusually small amount of 'cached'... I usually see the disk cache as 30-50% of the total memory. does this system not use much disk IO it's a kvm-host with lvm, the vm's all have there own lv's (some on a different pv). Would that explain the small cache? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 server responding extremely slow on ssh interactive
Op 29-01-15 om 21:21 schreef Gordon Messmer: I haven't seen delays anywhere near that long before, even with heavy swapping. But I guess I'd look at that sort of thing first. Run "iostat -x 2" and see if your disks are being fully utilized during the pauses. Run "top" and see if there's anything useful there. Check swap use with "free". Try decreasing swappiness with "echo 10 >/proc/sys/vm/swappiness" ___ iostat random sample avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 3,770,001,450,000,00 94,78 Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sda 0,00 0,500,00 11,00 0,00 136,0012,36 0,000,00 0,00 0,00 sdb 0,00 0,000,00 11,50 0,00 148,0012,87 0,000,09 0,09 0,10 sdc 0,00 0,000,000,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 dm-0 0,00 0,000,004,00 0,00 32,00 8,00 0,000,00 0,00 0,00 dm-1 0,00 0,000,000,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 dm-2 0,00 0,000,000,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 dm-3 0,00 0,000,00 11,50 0,00 148,0012,87 0,000,13 0,13 0,15 dm-4 0,00 0,000,000,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 dm-5 0,00 0,000,007,50 0,00 104,0013,87 0,000,07 0,07 0,05 atop ATOP - 2015/01/30 10:18:14 - 10s elapsed PRC | sys3.87s | user 14.93s | #proc197 | #zombie0 | #exit 0 | CPU | sys 30% | user119% | irq 1% | idle533% | wait 0% | cpu | sys 2% | user 21% | irq 0% | idle 56% | cpu000 w 0% | cpu | sys 3% | user 19% | irq 0% | idle 59% | cpu001 w 0% | cpu | sys 8% | user 15% | irq 0% | idle 62% | cpu003 w 0% | cpu | sys 3% | user 13% | irq 0% | idle 73% | cpu002 w 0% | cpu | sys 3% | user 14% | irq 0% | idle 70% | cpu006 w 0% | cpu | sys 4% | user 15% | irq 0% | idle 66% | cpu005 w 0% | cpu | sys 2% | user 11% | irq 0% | idle 77% | cpu007 w 0% | cpu | sys 5% | user 11% | irq 0% | idle 73% | cpu004 w 0% | CPL | avg11.92 | avg51.97 | avg15 1.61 | csw 229508 | intr 191786 | MEM | tot47.1G | free 15.9G | cache 519.3M | buff 109.3M | slab 353.3M | SWP | tot 7.8G | free7.3G | | vmcom 31.8G | vmlim 31.3G | LVM | g_15k-lv_15k | busy 0% | read 1 | write 98 | avio 0.15 ms | LVM | to-lv_oracle | busy 0% | read 0 | write 66 | avio 0.06 ms | LVM | v_oracletest | busy 0% | read 0 | write 79 | avio 0.05 ms | LVM | uito-lv_root | busy 0% | read 0 | write 1 | avio 3.00 ms | DSK | sdb | busy 0% | read 1 | write 98 | avio 0.16 ms | DSK | sda | busy 0% | read 0 | write146 | avio 0.08 ms | NET | transport| tcpi 12 | tcpo 12 | udpi 0 | udpo 0 | NET | network | ipi 13 | ipo 12 | ipfrw 0 | deliv 12 | NET | vnet0 8% | pcki2273 | pcko2581 | si 850 Kbps | so 458 Kbps | NET | vnet1 4% | pcki2186 | pcko2075 | si 391 Kbps | so 422 Kbps | NET | eth0 0% | pcki1330 | pcko1432 | si 159 Kbps | so 537 Kbps | NET | br0 | pcki 43 | pcko 22 | si1 Kbps | so4 Kbps | PID SYSCPU USRCPU VGROW RGROW RDDSK WRDSK ST EXC S CPU CMD 1960 2.37s 9.23s 0K 0K 8K 2520K -- - S 101% qemu-kvm 1990 0.69s 5.65s 0K 0K 0K 1196K -- - S 55% qemu-kvm 1975 0.50s 0.00s 0K 0K 0K 0K -- - S 4% kvm-pit-wq 2009 0.20s 0.00s 0K 0K 0K 0K -- - S 2% kvm-pit-wq 23321 0.05s 0.02s 0K 0K 0K 0K -- - R 1% atop 18384 0.05s 0.01s 0K 0K 0K 0K -- - S 1% atop 1719 0.00s 0.01s 0K 0K 0K 0K -- - S 0% hpasmlited 1746 0.00s 0.01s 0K 0K 0K 0K -- - S 0% hp-asrd 35 0.01s 0.00s 0K 0K 0K 0K -- - D 0% events/0 10707 0.00s 0.00s 0K 0K 0K 0K -- - S 0% arping 10740 0.00s 0.00s 0K 0K 0K 0K -- - S 0% arping 58 0.00s 0.00s 0K 0K 0K 0K -- - S 0% kblockd/0 18425 0.00s 0.00s 0K 0K 0K 0K -- - S 0% flush-253:0 free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 48218 31895 16323 0 108519 -/+ buffers/cache: 31267 16951 Swap: 7951476 7475 But I had
Re: [CentOS] C6 server responding extremely slow on ssh interactive
Op 28-01-15 om 17:51 schreef anax: Hi Patrick have you ever tried to find out on which side the hanger is: on the client's or on the server's, using tcpumg or the like? That migth help a bit further on, that might. suomi I'm not sure what you mean with tcpumg. But after testing with a physical console I'm experiencing the same problem. So I guess its the server. Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 server responding extremely slow on ssh interactive
Op 29-01-15 om 00:00 schreef Gordon Messmer: On 01/28/2015 12:12 PM, Patrick Bervoets wrote: ARPING 192.168.1.15 from 0.0.0.0 br0 Unicast reply from 192.168.1.15 [AC:16:2D:72:67:D4] 0.723ms Sent 1 probes (1 broadcast(s)) Received 1 response(s) Thanks anyway I'm not sure what you mean by "thanks anyway". You got a response. There's an IPv4 conflict on your network. That's why you're seeing those delays. If there's no conflict, you should see 0 responses. Gordon, I'm sorry, I misunderstood you (and arping -D) This was the result of arping on another host; I thought I should see 2 responses in case of an ip conflict. Arping on the troublesome server gives 0 responses. I just tried with a physical console on that server and there I got the same unresponsive behaviour. Does this rule out network related problems? Mark (m.roth) suggested the vms eating up the video bus. (2 vms with an Oracle database) But I'm not sure how I could test that. Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 server responding extremely slow on ssh interactive
Op 28-01-15 om 20:17 schreef Gordon Messmer: On 01/28/2015 05:15 AM, Patrick Bervoets wrote: When connecting with ssh the console is extremely slow and hangs for minutes at a time Check for IP address conflicts in the server's network. For IPv4: # arping -D -I ARPING 192.168.1.15 from 0.0.0.0 br0 Unicast reply from 192.168.1.15 [AC:16:2D:72:67:D4] 0.723ms Sent 1 probes (1 broadcast(s)) Received 1 response(s) Thanks anyway Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 server responding extremely slow on ssh interactive
Op 28-01-15 om 17:51 schreef anax: Hi Patrick have you ever tried to find out on which side the hanger is: on the client's or on the server's, using tcpumg or the like? That migth help a bit further on, that might. suomi Not yet, I'll try that out tomorrow Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 server responding extremely slow on ssh interactive
Op 28-01-15 om 17:20 schreef Marcelo Ricardo Leitner: On 28-01-2015 11:15, Patrick Bervoets wrote: I have a C6 server acting as a kvm-host. When connecting with ssh the console is extremely slow and hangs for minutes at a time. Connecting to this server is not the problem. If I use: ssh root@host "whatever" I got immediate response even when interactive consoles opened with ssh are hanging. Sorry, is it hanging during the session or while attempting to establish a new one? If this last, it may be dns and ssh -v may help. The former is weird, I don't think I ever saw it. Marcelo Marcelo, It hangs during the session. Once I'm logged in and beginning to type it displays 3-5 chars and then hangs for up to 15 minutes, a few more chars, wait, and so on. Checked my resolv.conf; added 'options single-request-reopen' though I don't know if that is helping. Yes it is weird; even more that individual commands sent with ssh gives immediate respons. Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] C6 server responding extremely slow on ssh interactive
I have a C6 server acting as a kvm-host. When connecting with ssh the console is extremely slow and hangs for minutes at a time. Connecting to this server is not the problem. If I use: ssh root@host "whatever" I got immediate response even when interactive consoles opened with ssh are hanging. Linux [...] 2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 01:55:02 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux total used free shared buffers cached Mem:47 35 11 0 0 0 -/+ buffers/cache: 35 11 Swap:7 0 7 FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg-lv_root 50G 6,4G 41G 14% / tmpfs 24G 0 24G 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda1 477M 123M 329M 28% /boot 13:33:34 up 1 day, 18:30, 2 users, load average: 3.39, 2.53, 2.36 (it's an 8-core) Nothing particular in log/messages. The vm's are running normally and they are not showing the same behaviour. Can anybody give me a pointer? Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Boost: updates but no announcement; nothing on rhel errata neither?
Hello, I've been offered updates for boost* on C6. There has been no announcement at the moment. But neither do I find anything on rhn.redhat.com/errata/ Anyone knows how I should treat this update? Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] No announce for RHSA-2015:0074 Important: jasper security update
There was no announce for RHSA-2015:0074 Important: jasper security update Coincidence or has it something to do with the recent errata-discussion? Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] SELinux-alert: aide wants to write to /var/run/winbindd/pipe
Hi, does anyone know if aide should have access to this socket? SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/aide from write access on the sock_file /var/run/winbindd/pipe. Thanks Patrick (on CentOS6 if that matters) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Secret incantations for virt-viewer?
I use --connect=qemu+ssh://r...@host.company.tl/system virtualname greetings Patrick Op 30-12-14 om 15:46 schreef Bill Gee: Hello everyone - I am trying to use virt-viewer to connect to KVM virtual machines running on a CentOS7 host. It works great when running directly on the host, but I have not been able to figure out the magic connection string to make it work from another computer. On the host, I set selinux to "permissive" and stopped the firewalld service. No change, so it is not related to them. Almost every command I try gives an immediate dialog box that says "Unable to connect to libvirt with URI ...". The only command line that gets me anything different is this: virt-viewer --connect xen+ssh://root@practice7.billgee.local/ dd2a2ba7-707d-42b5-8c83-94b11ce6e269 This will ask me for the root password on the host machine and then gives me the same "Unable to connect" message. I tried it with a regular user account instead of root and got the same result. I have tried it with and without the "root@" string. I tried using both the UUID and the domain name of the guest. I tried all of the following protocols: ssh:// qemu:// qemu:/// xen:// xen+ssh:// qemu_ssh:// qemu+ssh:// If I open a regular ssh shell using the +X parameter and then launch virt- viewer, it works. The connection string in that case is --connect=qemu:///system Any suggestions? Thanks - Bill Gee ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] connect an iphone 5 to centos
Does anyone know if you can connect an iphone 5 with ios 8.1.2 to either Centos 6 or 7? I've installed libimobiledevice but there's nothing happening. Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] selinux-policy update resets /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts?
Op 17-12-14 om 15:12 schreef Daniel J Walsh: On 12/17/2014 05:07 AM, Patrick Bervoets wrote: Hi, On an internal webserver (latest C6) I want smb-access to /var/www/html/ In april I did chcon -R -t public_content_rw_t /var/www/html/ setsebool -P allow_smbd_anon_write 1 setsebool -P allow_httpd_anon_write 1 echo "/var/www/html/ -- unconfined_u:object_r:public_content_rw_t:s0" >> /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts This is incorrect. # semanage fcontext -a -t public_content_rw_t '/var/www/html(/.*?)' # restorecon -R -v /var/www/html Should change the label and it should survive relabel. After the latest round of updates (including selinux-policy.noarch 0:3.7.19-260.el6_6.1 and selinux-policy-targeted.noarch 0:3.7.19-260.el6_6.1) samba-access to /var/www/html was denied. Thanks, I know I shouldn't just follow serverfault instructions without complete understanding. One day I'll have to learn to master selinux. (and rtfm) Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] selinux-policy update resets /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts?
Op 17-12-14 om 14:56 schreef Jonathan Billings: On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:07:06AM +0100, Patrick Bervoets wrote: echo "/var/www/html/ -- unconfined_u:object_r:public_content_rw_t:s0" >> /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts Next time try putting the local policy into: /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.local ... which isn't overwritten by package updates. This is what would have happened if you had used the 'semanage fcontext' command. Thank you, it even makes sense :-) Troubleshooting selinux is still on my skills-wishlist. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] selinux-policy update resets /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts?
Hi, On an internal webserver (latest C6) I want smb-access to /var/www/html/ In april I did chcon -R -t public_content_rw_t /var/www/html/ setsebool -P allow_smbd_anon_write 1 setsebool -P allow_httpd_anon_write 1 echo "/var/www/html/ -- unconfined_u:object_r:public_content_rw_t:s0" >> /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts After the latest round of updates (including selinux-policy.noarch 0:3.7.19-260.el6_6.1 and selinux-policy-targeted.noarch 0:3.7.19-260.el6_6.1) samba-access to /var/www/html was denied. Applying the commands above re-enabled samba-access. Anyone knows how I can configure selinux to remeber this after an update to the policies? Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And now for something completely different. Win7 on KVM
Op 23-10-14 om 18:00 schreef James B. Byrne: At the moment none I guess. The message is that the client cannot find a driver. I have virtio-win-0.1-74.iso and virtio-win-0.1-81.iso on the hypervisor host. How do I get the driver from there into the guest? Does the client have access to the hypervisor's file-systems? Do I mount the ISO as a cd-rom in the guest? How is that done? In virt-manager? Is there a document somewhere that I can get an idea on how this is supposed to work? James, I don't know if help is still needed. You can mount the iso via virt-manager if you have (or create) a virt-storage-pool. If you can reboot the client you could edit /etc/libvirt/qemu/virtclientname.xml and add to (if your client already has more than 2 drives attached, change target dev hdc to hdd or ...) You can switch your storages to virtio too, I did it in the past but fail to find my notes. I think that the steps on this page are correct: http://setdosa.blogspot.be/2013/09/moving-your-windows-guest-from-ide-to.html And, of course, work on a snapshot or at least have a copy of your client. If you need help to change the driver in Windows I suggest we take this off-list since some are very allergic to Microsoft. Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And now for something completely different. Win7 on KVM
Op 22-10-14 om 23:15 schreef James B. Byrne: As you can probably guess by now I am working my way down through my outstanding issue list trying to get as many deferred items closed out as I can before the next security storm hits. We have a Win7pro KVM guest that has been giving us networking issues since it was created. The last problem was that it was picking up its network address from the virtio DHCP service, with predicable results. This turned out to be an issue with how the virtual nic was configured (it was using NAT instead of the br0 bridge. We have adjusted the settings on the guest so the the nic is configured as a shared device / br0 / Device Model=virtio. Now after it boots the thing says that it does not have a driver for Ethernet adaptor at all. Is there a different setting for the model that I should be using? I have to point out that this thing was originally installed from cd-rom and then updated from the internet. So at some point it must have had a working network connection. Any ideas as to how to get it to find the network interface again? James, on the client, which driver do you use? Mine is 'Red Hat VirtIO Ethernet Adapter' 61.65.104.7400 20/11/2013. I got it from virtio-win-0.1-74.iso Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] KDE C6.5+cr : heads-up screens renamed after update
Just for your information: after applying the cr-updates to a C6.5 my screens on my laptop renamed from VGA1 and eDP1 to VGA-0 and eDP-0. And since X insists that my VGA is left to my eDP (and my scripted xrandr was confused by the renaming) I had to go to the left to reach my right screen. I needed some more coffee this morning. Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] What happens to in-use files when I restart samba?
One of the services that has to be restarted after the openssl update is samba. And now I wonder if I can safely restart samba when there are possible files in-use (ie writes could be happening). I can't find an answer on Google (could be me asking the wrong questions) Thanks for any pointers Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] needs-restarting: one server reports nothing te restart (after updating openssl) C6.5
Hi, After updating openssl on most of my C6.5-servers needs-restarting reports at least sshd, ntpd and sendmail. But on 1 server needs-restarting reports nothing. And yes, sshd, ntpd and sendmail are running. All yum-utils are latest yum-utils-1.1.30-17.el6_5.noarch. openssh-clients-5.3p1-94.el6.x86_64 ntp-4.2.6p5-1.el6.centos.x86_64 sendmail-8.14.4-8.el6.x86_64 At least ssh and ntp are straight out of distro and all my sendmails have the same configuration. How reliable is needs-restarting? Or how can this be explained? Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6.5 KDE - no more audio (yesterday it was ok)
op 04-06-14 20:58, schreef Patrick Bervoets: Hi, I've got an HP ZBook with C6.5 and KDE. Yesterday I was able to play music, today I can't get any sound out of my pc. lspci -v 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset High Definition Audio Controller (rev 04) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 1909 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 34 Memory at cca3 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [60] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+ Capabilities: [70] Express Root Complex Integrated Endpoint, MSI 00 Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel grep snd /var/log/messages (latest boot): Jun 4 19:45:20 Antisana kernel: snd_hda_intel :00:1b.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0 Jun 4 19:45:20 Antisana kernel: snd_hda_intel :00:1b.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0 Jun 4 19:45:20 Antisana kernel: snd_hda_intel :00:1b.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 22 (level, low) -> IRQ 22 Elsewhere in messages I find a occurences of Jun 3 17:50:56 Antisana pulseaudio[3454]: alsa-sink.c: Waarschijnlijk is dit een fout in het ALSA-stuurprogramma ‘snd_hda_intel’. Meld dit probleem alstublieft aan de ALSA-ontwikkelaars. Jun 3 17:50:56 Antisana pulseaudio[3454]: alsa-sink.c: We werden gewekt met POLLOUT ingesteld -- echter een opvolgende snd_pcm_avail() gaf 0 terug of een andere waarde < min_avail. (but the sound worked at that moment) I tried with alsmixer, alsunmute and PCM and Master are unmuted and maxed. Any ideas? Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Now wait a minute, after a reboot sounds works again... feels like I'm back to standard Windows troubleshooting :-) Anyway solved for now, sorry for the noise Greetings Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] C6.5 KDE - no more audio (yesterday it was ok)
Hi, I've got an HP ZBook with C6.5 and KDE. Yesterday I was able to play music, today I can't get any sound out of my pc. lspci -v 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset High Definition Audio Controller (rev 04) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 1909 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 34 Memory at cca3 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [60] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+ Capabilities: [70] Express Root Complex Integrated Endpoint, MSI 00 Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel grep snd /var/log/messages (latest boot): Jun 4 19:45:20 Antisana kernel: snd_hda_intel :00:1b.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0 Jun 4 19:45:20 Antisana kernel: snd_hda_intel :00:1b.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0 Jun 4 19:45:20 Antisana kernel: snd_hda_intel :00:1b.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 22 (level, low) -> IRQ 22 Elsewhere in messages I find a occurences of Jun 3 17:50:56 Antisana pulseaudio[3454]: alsa-sink.c: Waarschijnlijk is dit een fout in het ALSA-stuurprogramma ‘snd_hda_intel’. Meld dit probleem alstublieft aan de ALSA-ontwikkelaars. Jun 3 17:50:56 Antisana pulseaudio[3454]: alsa-sink.c: We werden gewekt met POLLOUT ingesteld -- echter een opvolgende snd_pcm_avail() gaf 0 terug of een andere waarde < min_avail. (but the sound worked at that moment) I tried with alsmixer, alsunmute and PCM and Master are unmuted and maxed. Any ideas? Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] parsing out adjacent text
op 03-06-14 16:32, schreef Tim Dunphy: What I need to figure out at this point is how to get the time and date info on the same line as it's category. ie get Time and date: 06/03/14 10:24:09 instead of Time and date: 06/03/14 10:24:09 printf "Time and date: $(/bin/date +"%D %H:%M:%S")\n" solves both problems here As it is now. Also I'm trying to print out newlines with echo -e "\n" but somehow that isn't working. Tho I think I've gotten that to work in the past. If someone could please help me fix these minor formatting issues that would be great and appreciated. Thanks Tim ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] parsing out adjacent text
op 03-06-14 15:18, schreef Tim Dunphy:
[root@uszmpwslp014lc ~]# GET http://$(hostname -i)/server-status | grep
-i requests/sec
4.08 requests/sec - 80.9 kB/second - 19.8 kB/request
That works ok. And next I'm grepping it back down and awking it to just the
part I'm interested in:
[root@uszmpwslp014lc ~]# GET http://$(hostname -i)/server-status | grep -i
-e request -e requests/sec | grep -i -v -e currently -e code -e ss | awk
'{print $1}'
4.08
But now I need to get rid of just the in front of the 4.08?
cut --delimiter=">" --field=2
you could even get rid of the awk and pipe your grep to cut --delimiter=">" --field=2 |
cut --delimiter=" " --field=1
But there are many different ways to solve this.
greetings
Patrick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Realtek device 5249 kernel module for C6 - a request to epel
Hi, I try to make my SD-reader work on a HP ZBook. lspci 5d:00.0 Unassigned class [ff00]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device 5249 (rev 01) uname -a Linux Antisana.psc-elsene.be 2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed May 7 23:32:49 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Googling gave me http://linuxterminal.org/issue-with-rts5229-pci-express-card-reader/; last reply by François suggests to download the Realtek 5229 driver, edit the Makefile and rtsx.c and compile. And it works as stated. It would be handy if this module could be incorporated with epel. But I can't find the right way to make such a request. (shame on me) Thanks for any pointer Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] KDE on C6.5: start a program from command line on a specific screen
op 30-04-14 15:09, schreef Alexandru Chiscan: In KDE you can force the position, size, fullscreen etc based on the window properties: class title, etc. you can access the options by clicking right mouse button on the window title and selecting "Advanced->Special Window Settings..." you can memorize the positioning for your windows one in screen 0 and the other in screen 1 and after that start the virt-viewer with the -f option to force full screen - each window will go fullscreen in it's screen Lec On 04/30/2014 01:00 PM, Patrick Bervoets wrote: I'd like to start from konsole a virt-viewer to vm1 on screen vga1 and another virt-viewer to vm2 on screen lvds1. Anyone knows if this is possible with KDE on a CentOS 6.5? Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Great, I thought it would take the same position for every virt-viewer but it remembers the vm too. Thanks a lot Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] rkhunter 1.4.2 (epel) unary operator expected -ne found
Anyone seeing this?
/etc/cron.daily/rkhunter:
/usr/bin/rkhunter: regel 13967: [: eenzijdige operator werd verwacht, -ne
gevonden
Translating: line 13967 unary operator expected -ne found
Line 13967 is: if [ `${IPCS_CMD} -u 2>/dev/null | awk -F' ' '/segments
allocated/ {print $3}'` -ne 0 ]; then
rkhunter 1.4.2 release 1.el6 from epel on a CentOS 6.5
Thanks
Patrick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] KDE on C6.5: start a program from command line on a specific screen
I'd like to start from konsole a virt-viewer to vm1 on screen vga1 and another virt-viewer to vm2 on screen lvds1. Anyone knows if this is possible with KDE on a CentOS 6.5? Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Anyone has experience with OpenVAS and the Atomicorp repository
I was looking for a vulnerability scanner and found OpenVAS. Does anyone has experiences with that scanner? And with the Atomicorp repository? (the OpenVAS website refers to that repo) Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] fasttrack mirror server out of sync?
I don't know if it's useful to report this: (& who should I report it to?) # yum update [...] * base: mirrors.ircam.fr * extras: mirrors.ircam.fr * fasttrack: mirror.ovh.net * remi-ff: rpms.famillecollet.com * updates: centosq3.centos.org base | 3.7 kB 00:00 cr | 2.9 kB 00:00 extras | 3.4 kB 00:00 fasttrack | 3.4 kB 00:00 Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have: Current : Thu Jun 20 14:40:52 2013 Downloaded: Wed Jun 12 13:45:25 2013 To me it looks like mirror.ovh.net isn't sync'ing. for example: http://mirror.ovh.net/ftp.centos.org/6.4/updates/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml is from June the 13th http://centosq3.centos.org/centos-6/6.4/updates/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml is from June the 20th (idem for mirrors.ircam.fr) bye Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Is there a problem with C6 CR and glibc?
Op 11-10-11 13:43, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg schreef: > Patrick Bervoets wrote: >> Well, I've found the file when browsing to mirrors.centos.org: >> >> in 6.0/cr/rpms I find glibc-2.12-1.25.el6.i686.rpm >> in 6.0/cr/drpms I find glibc-2.12-1.7.el6_2.12-1.25.el6_1.3.i686.drpm > > you should find the el6_1.3.i686 rpm in cr/rpms, it does show up for me: > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.0/cr/x86_64/RPMS/glibc-2.12-1.25.el6_1.3.i686.rpm > > if not I guess your nearest mirror has a problem, maybe try another mirror. > > yes DL'ing the file and doing yum localinstall should be fine. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Okay, look at me being a fool! While I was shure I added priority=1 to the CR.repo I didn't doublecheck that file (I did check my other .repo's). Until now. Thanks Nicolas and Ljubomir for your time and help! What a shame For the record: I local-installed glibc without problems Installing : glibc-2.12-1.25.el6_1.3.i686 Installing : nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.8-1.el6_0.i686 but then... yum install samba [...] Error: Protected multilib versions: zlib-1.2.3-25.el6.i686 != zlib-1.2.3-26.el6.x86_64 Error: Protected multilib versions: audit-libs-2.0.4-1.el6.i686 != audit-libs-2.1-5.el6.x86_64 Error: Protected multilib versions: samba-common-3.5.4-68.el6_0.2.i686 != samba-common-3.5.6-86.el6_1.4.x86_64 Error: Protected multilib versions: libtdb-1.2.1-2.el6.i686 != libtdb-1.2.1-3.el6.x86_64 Error: Protected multilib versions: pam-1.1.1-4.el6_0.1.i686 != pam-1.1.1-8.el6.x86_64 Error: Protected multilib versions: libcom_err-1.41.12-3.el6.i686 != libcom_err-1.41.12-7.el6.x86_64 Error: Protected multilib versions: openldap-2.4.19-15.el6_0.2.i686 != openldap-2.4.23-15.el6_1.1.x86_64 Error: Protected multilib versions: samba-winbind-clients-3.5.4-68.el6_0.2.i686 != samba-winbind-clients-3.5.6-86.el6_1.4.x86_64 Error: Protected multilib versions: libuuid-2.17.2-6.el6_0.1.i686 != libuuid-2.17.2-12.el6.x86_64 Error: Protected multilib versions: openssl-1.0.0-4.el6_0.2.i686 != openssl-1.0.0-10.el6_1.4.x86_64 Error: Protected multilib versions: krb5-libs-1.8.2-3.el6_0.7.i686 != krb5-libs-1.9-9.el6.x86_64 Error: Protected multilib versions: libselinux-2.0.94-2.el6.i686 != libselinux-2.0.94-5.el6.x86_64 Error: Protected multilib versions: libattr-2.4.44-4.el6.i686 != libattr-2.4.44-7.el6.x86_64 And then I went back to my cr.repo Strange thing is, now it installs only the samba.x86_64 without complaining. No more i686's. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Is there a problem with C6 CR and glibc?
Op 11-10-11 12:36, Ljubomir Ljubojevic schreef: > Vreme: 10/11/2011 11:52 AM, Patrick Bervoets piše: >> Is there a glibc 2.12-1.25 in CR? I get a "No package >> glibc-2.12-1.25.el6_1.3.i686 available." message. For i686 only the 1.7 >> release shows. > Yes there is, I have it on x86_64 system. Try deleting > /var/cache/yum/ manually, maybe that helps. > No luck with that either. Well, I've found the file when browsing to mirrors.centos.org: in 6.0/cr/rpms I find glibc-2.12-1.25.el6.i686.rpm <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.0/cr/x86_64/RPMS/glibc-2.12-1.25.el6.i686.rpm> in 6.0/cr/drpms I find glibc-2.12-1.7.el6_2.12-1.25.el6_1.3.i686.drpm <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.0/cr/x86_64/drpms/glibc-2.12-1.7.el6_2.12-1.25.el6_1.3.i686.drpm> Should I download that file and localinstall it? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Is there a problem with C6 CR and glibc?
Op 11-10-11 11:30, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg schreef: > Patrick Bervoets wrote: >> C6 with CR x86_64 >> >> Third time when trying to install a packet I get: >> >> yum install samba >> [...] >> --> Finished Dependency Resolution >> Error: Package: glibc-2.12-1.7.el6_0.5.i686 (updates) >> Requires: glibc-common = 2.12-1.7.el6_0.5 >> Installed: glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6_1.3.x86_64 (@cr) >> glibc-common = 2.12-1.25.el6_1.3 >> Available: glibc-common-2.12-1.7.el6.x86_64 (base) >> glibc-common = 2.12-1.7.el6 >> Available: glibc-common-2.12-1.7.el6_0.3.x86_64 (updates) >> glibc-common = 2.12-1.7.el6_0.3 >> Available: glibc-common-2.12-1.7.el6_0.4.x86_64 (updates) >> glibc-common = 2.12-1.7.el6_0.4 >> Available: glibc-common-2.12-1.7.el6_0.5.x86_64 (updates) >> glibc-common = 2.12-1.7.el6_0.5 >> >> Had the same problem yesterday with a Canondriver-rpm and earlier with >> either Hugin or Scribus. >> Searched on Google and found many old pages (afaik nothing C6). >> >> I don't think there is a glibc-common i686 package (neither do I know if >> that would be a good idea). >> Should I downgrade glibc-common to 2.12-1.7? Or install a second >> glibc-common? Or just wait? >> >> BTW I tried to install Samba with only Base, Updates and CR repo enabled. > > works here, you should be getting glibc-2.12-1.25.el6_1.3.i686 from CR. > > are you using yum priorities? base, updates and CR need the same priority. > > otherwise do "yum clean all" then try again, as usual when yum breaks. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > I am using priorities and base = updates = cr = 1. Normally epel and rpmforge = 50; but for testing I disabled them. While I forgot to "clean all" (and started to feel silly); it doesn't help. Is there a glibc 2.12-1.25 in CR? I get a "No package glibc-2.12-1.25.el6_1.3.i686 available." message. For i686 only the 1.7 release shows. Thanks for helping ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Is there a problem with C6 CR and glibc?
C6 with CR x86_64 Third time when trying to install a packet I get: yum install samba [...] --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: glibc-2.12-1.7.el6_0.5.i686 (updates) Requires: glibc-common = 2.12-1.7.el6_0.5 Installed: glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6_1.3.x86_64 (@cr) glibc-common = 2.12-1.25.el6_1.3 Available: glibc-common-2.12-1.7.el6.x86_64 (base) glibc-common = 2.12-1.7.el6 Available: glibc-common-2.12-1.7.el6_0.3.x86_64 (updates) glibc-common = 2.12-1.7.el6_0.3 Available: glibc-common-2.12-1.7.el6_0.4.x86_64 (updates) glibc-common = 2.12-1.7.el6_0.4 Available: glibc-common-2.12-1.7.el6_0.5.x86_64 (updates) glibc-common = 2.12-1.7.el6_0.5 Had the same problem yesterday with a Canondriver-rpm and earlier with either Hugin or Scribus. Searched on Google and found many old pages (afaik nothing C6). I don't think there is a glibc-common i686 package (neither do I know if that would be a good idea). Should I downgrade glibc-common to 2.12-1.7? Or install a second glibc-common? Or just wait? BTW I tried to install Samba with only Base, Updates and CR repo enabled. Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.6 and intel MHD4500 graphics card
Hüvely Balázs schreef: I've a toshiba satellite notebook, and I tried to install centos 5.6. The installer starts, but when it turns to graphical mode, the backlight goes off. I see the windows, buttons, but it's very dark, maybe the backlight switching off.. Ok, I rm the xorg.conf file. After I start immediately the X server, the screen was visible but only in 800x600 resolution. I tried to change it, but there is no other modes available. So I get back to console and try s-c-d, then start again X. The backlight went off again, so I returned to the original problem. looks like http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4363 to me I don't know if this is relevant but I do have (had?) the same problem with a HP with nvidia (+ proprietary driver); but only with the brightness set to manual. With brightness set to automatic (to environmental lighting) I don't experience the same problem. It happened after 5.4 but since I had a workaround I didn't investigate at the moment. Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
