Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-07 Thread Test
I personnaly like the combination: Postfix, Mailscanner, Group-Office.

Group-office has the functionality i need (email, calendar, calendar
sharing, tasks, filemanager, addressbooks, projectmanager etc... 
Yet is quite simple to setup and use...
In the professional version there is also a synchronisation option to sync
with outlook...

Authentication can be performed on database, email or ldap...

eGroupware is another one, similir to group-office but with much more
functionality.


 - Original Message -
 Subject: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement
 From: Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
 Date: 07-04-2008 7:15
 
 
 What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with
that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?
 
 Thanks!
 jlc
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-07 Thread Shawn Everett
On Sunday 06 April 2008, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
 What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with
 that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?

 Thanks!
 jlc

Kollab is pretty decent although it's a bit particular to install.

Shawn
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-07 Thread js

Shawn Everett wrote:

On Sunday 06 April 2008, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
  

What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with
that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?

Thanks!
jlc



Kollab is pretty decent although it's a bit particular to install.

Shawn
  


And don't forget horde-groupware webmail edition, you can use your own
imap server (cyrus-imap in my case) to authenticate users:
a good groupware.

Regars

js.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-07 Thread Kevin Thorpe

js wrote:

Shawn Everett wrote:

On Sunday 06 April 2008, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
 

What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with
that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?
We're running the Community edition of Scalix. Easy to setup, easy to 
administrate. Fully integrates with Outlook and has an AJAX webmail app 
as an alternative. On the down side it's a bit server heavy (as Java 
tends to be) and the IMAP server is a bit buggy, but if you use Outlook 
then you'll avoid that.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-07 Thread Tronn Wærdahl
On 4/7/08, Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with
 that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?

 Thanks!
 jlc


What about Open-Xchange they have two open source versions. It could be a
challange to compile OX, then you could use the install CD (iso-image) from
NnorTuX http://www.nnortux.no

Tronn



 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




-- 
The box said: Requires MS Windows or better, so I installed Linux
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-07 Thread Simon Jolle
2008/4/7, Rudi Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Joseph L. Casale wrote:
  What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with
  that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?

  What about Zimbra or Scallix?

Both not Open Source
Scalix uses Scalix Public License (SPL) and Zimbra uses Yahoo Public
License (YPL) - both crap licenses and not OSI approved.

cheers
Simon

-- 
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-07 Thread Steven Haigh

On 07/04/2008, at 10:10 PM, Simon Jolle wrote:

2008/4/7, Rudi Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange  
with

that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?



What about Zimbra or Scallix?


Both not Open Source
Scalix uses Scalix Public License (SPL) and Zimbra uses Yahoo Public
License (YPL) - both crap licenses and not OSI approved.

cheers
Simon



Open Source does not depend on the license. You've been drinking the  
GPL koolaid too long if you think this is the case.


Without turning this into a religious debate that I can see on the  
horizon, you should really read this:

http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php

Comparing the Zimbra licensing (http://www.zimbra.com/license/) to the  
definitions in the link above, Zimbra seems to fit the definition of  
Open Source...


The Scalix license (http://www.scalix.com/community/opensource/licensing.php 
) may also fit the bill...


--
Steven Haigh

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897





___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-07 Thread Johnny Hughes

Simon Jolle wrote:

2008/4/7, Rudi Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Joseph L. Casale wrote:

What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with
that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?



 What about Zimbra or Scallix?


Both not Open Source
Scalix uses Scalix Public License (SPL) and Zimbra uses Yahoo Public
License (YPL) - both crap licenses and not OSI approved.


Well, the first part of your statement is debatable (that they are not 
Open Source), but the second part is fact .. they do not use OSI 
approved licenses.  So, if your definition of Open Source is an OSI 
approved license, then they are not open source.


What's more, in all of these cases full outlook capability is not 
provided in the Free version anyway.


Outlook calender/meeting functionality requires (in almost all the 
solutions) a really non open source (proprietary and not compilable) 
program to make use of the proprietary outlook/exchange interface called 
MAPI.  Most of the free versions of these mail systems use IMAP, with 
will not properly be used by outlook to do calander functions ... and 
they charge for the  outlook MAPI client, which will allow for outlook 
calender/meeting functions.





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-07 Thread Matt Shields
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Rudi Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Joseph L. Casale wrote:

 
 
 
  What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with
 that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?
 
  Thanks!
  jlc
  
 
  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
 
  What about Zimbra or Scallix?

  --

A friend of mine is running Scalix for one of the town's where I live.
 It's used for all town government employees, plus all high school
staff, teachers and students.  I think he said there are about 5000
mailboxes and it runs smoothly.  I don't know if he has it setup as a
cluster or with a SAN or what.  But I know he likes it.

-- 
-matt
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-07 Thread Jason Pyeron
 
 Outlook calender/meeting functionality requires (in almost all the
 solutions) a really non open source (proprietary and not compilable)
 program to make use of the proprietary outlook/exchange interface called
 MAPI.  Most of the free versions of these mail systems use IMAP, with
 will not properly be used by outlook to do calander functions ... and
 they charge for the  outlook MAPI client, which will allow for outlook
 calender/meeting functions.
 

We use exchange 5.5, in a virtual instance, with samba. Best solution for
our enterprise so far. 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-   -
- Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street #100-
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
-   -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you
have received it in error, purge the message from your system and
notify the sender immediately.  Any other use of the email by you
is prohibited. 



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-07 Thread James Pearson

Joseph L. Casale wrote:

What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange
with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?


Not open source, but I recently came across 'PostPath'
http://www.postpath.com - it claims to be the only 'True Drop-in
Exchange Alternative' - I believe parts of it are based on Postfix and 
Zimbra.


I've never used it, but would be interested in anyone that has ... as 
I'm looking for something that can work with Exchange, but without the 
'2nd class citizen' approach that Exchange gives non-Windows users.


James Pearson
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-07 Thread Johnny Hughes

Steven Haigh wrote:

On 07/04/2008, at 10:10 PM, Simon Jolle wrote:

2008/4/7, Rudi Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Joseph L. Casale wrote:

What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with
that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?



What about Zimbra or Scallix?


Both not Open Source
Scalix uses Scalix Public License (SPL) and Zimbra uses Yahoo Public
License (YPL) - both crap licenses and not OSI approved.

cheers
Simon



Open Source does not depend on the license. You've been drinking the GPL 
koolaid too long if you think this is the case.


Without turning this into a religious debate that I can see on the 
horizon, you should really read this:

http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php

Comparing the Zimbra licensing (http://www.zimbra.com/license/) to the 
definitions in the link above, Zimbra seems to fit the definition of 
Open Source...




It does NOT fit the definition ... mainly because of the Attribution 
requirements ... if it DID fit the defination, it would be approved by 
the OSI.  It was rejected as an OSI license.  Here is one discussion:


http://linuxgazette.net/148/moen.html

Really though, whether or not it fits with YOUR definition of Open 
Source or Simon's or mine is not relevant ... the only FACT is that the 
OSI has not approved either license (and both asked for approval). What 
that means to each user is not really relevant to this list.  The OSI 
only matters to people who think it matters, and to others it does not.


The Scalix license 
(http://www.scalix.com/community/opensource/licensing.php) may also fit 
the bill...





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-07 Thread Rudi Ahlers

Simon Jolle wrote:

2008/4/7, Rudi Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  

Joseph L. Casale wrote:


What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with
that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?
  


  

 What about Zimbra or Scallix?



Both not Open Source
Scalix uses Scalix Public License (SPL) and Zimbra uses Yahoo Public
License (YPL) - both crap licenses and not OSI approved.

cheers
Simon

  
Well, that's the closest you gonna get. Open Exchange, eGroupware, etc 
doesn't even come close to MS Exhange.


--

Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
CEO, SoftDux

Web:   http://www.SoftDux.com
Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other 
technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stuff

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-07 Thread Bill Campbell
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What about Zimbra or Scallix?


Zimbra looks impressive! Anyone here running it?

We have Zimbra running with several hundred mail users on a
CentOS 4.5 system (it wouldn't run on CentOS 5 when we started
the project).

It works well, but does not play nicely with others, basically
taking over major parts of the system, postfix, openldap, IMAP,
etc., and does so in a manner that makes it difficult to
integrate in some systems (e.g. put it behind a postfix, amavisd,
clamav, spamassassin system that I can keep current with the
Latest  Greatest updates, and configure DNSRBLs to my liking).

I like to think I have better solutions for e-mail handling than
Zimbra, and much prefer to use them unless there's an absolute
demand for Exchange functionallity.

I won't get into the licensing religious wars, nor do I mind
paying for proprietary solutions if they do a better job for my
paying customers than I can do with open source.

The horde/imp/kronolith/... family of programs, provide good
functionallity, but, like any webmail solution, have some basic
limitations due to the web interface.

Bill
-- 
INTERNET:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
URL: http://www.celestial.com/  PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
Voice:  (206) 236-1676  Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820
Fax:(206) 232-9186

If taxation without consent is not robbery, then any band of robbers
have only to declare themselves a government, and all their robberies
are legalized. -- Lysander Spooner, Letter to Grover Cleveland 1886
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with that 
provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?

Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-06 Thread Rudi Ahlers

Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange 
with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?


Thanks!
jlc


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  

What about Zimbra or Scallix?

--

Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
CEO, SoftDux

Web:   http://www.SoftDux.com
Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other 
technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stuff

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] MS Exchange Replacement

2008-04-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
What about Zimbra or Scallix?


Zimbra looks impressive! Anyone here running it?

jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos