Re: [CentOS] Re: Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0, Centos 5, and rpms
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 08:23 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:37:50PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am making some progress on my Centos 5 notebook build.
So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0.
Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing
improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not even had a chance to
look at Thunderbird 2.0, that is new)?
I have the install steps we covered here back on 2/2/07; but are there
rpms? I did not find anything over at ATrpms.
There are no FF/TB rpms at ATrpms, maybe you mean
rpmforge/Dag/plus/extras/karan?
Yeah, I noticed no FF/TB at ATrpms, but nowhere else either.
wrt a firefox 2 (or thunderbird) install ... they are fairly trivial to
do with the binaries produced by Mozilla.org.
just download and extract the tarballs from mozilla.org and move the
firefox directory (or the thunderbird directory)
to /usr/lib/firefox-2.0.x or /usr/lib/thunderbird-2.0.4.
install compat-libstdc++-33 with yum (or compat-libstdc++-296 ... I
can't remember which)
if you have firefox 1.5 installed:
mv /usr/bin/firefox /usr/bin/firefox.old
Create a symlink similar to this:
ln -s /usr/lib/firefox-2.0.4/firefox /usr/bin/firefox
(you need to to the same for thunderbird ...)
Then you need to take care of any plugins you have installed ... by
moving them from /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
and /usr/lib/firefox-1.5.{version}/plugins
to /usr/lib/firefox-2.0.4/plugins/
You need to manage upgrades yourself ... I just download the latest
firefox from mozilla and do this again when there are updates.
Note: In CentOS-5, firefox is a required install for other things ...
so if firefox-1.5 is installed and updated by yum, you will need to
recreate your /usr/bin/firefox symlink to use firefox 2.
I personally use evolution for e-mail and Gran Paradiso (firefox-3
alpha5) as my web browser ...
Trying to replace firefox on CentOS-5 with another RPM is going to be
versy problematic as several other packages are built against it in the
distribution ... but running 2 versions in parallel is not very hard.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0, Centos 5, and rpms
On 6/19/07, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wrt a firefox 2 (or thunderbird) install ... they are fairly trivial to do with the binaries produced by Mozilla.org. Just as a point of interest -- we have one person here who installed FF2 from the those tarballs on her CentOS 4 machine, and she's been having problems with it crashing every few days. I on the other hand have been running the FF1.5 from the CentOS repos for weeks at a time without any problem -- the only time I restart it is when I upgrade it or have to reboot. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0, Centos 5, and rpms
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:37:50PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am making some progress on my Centos 5 notebook build. So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0. Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not even had a chance to look at Thunderbird 2.0, that is new)? I have the install steps we covered here back on 2/2/07; but are there rpms? I did not find anything over at ATrpms. There are no FF/TB rpms at ATrpms, maybe you mean rpmforge/Dag/plus/extras/karan? Some advice would be greatly appreciated. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpnQa4FNcb0t.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0, Centos 5, and rpms
Axel Thimm wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:37:50PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am making some progress on my Centos 5 notebook build. So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0. Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not even had a chance to look at Thunderbird 2.0, that is new)? I have the install steps we covered here back on 2/2/07; but are there rpms? I did not find anything over at ATrpms. There are no FF/TB rpms at ATrpms, maybe you mean rpmforge/Dag/plus/extras/karan? Yeah, I noticed no FF/TB at ATrpms, but nowhere else either. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
