Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam

2008-06-09 Thread Peter Farrell
I agree with previous poster RE: Postini, we have clients that use the
service and it's fantastic.

I use Postfix / Amavisd - Clam-AV / SpamAssassin + SARE rulesets (with
DCC, Pyzor, Razor) locally and ater the initial setup it's excellent.

I've also done just Postfix / Amavisd - Clam-AV / SpamAssassin + SARE
and used Greylisting for other clients as well and that's been
unbelievable. Greylisting as a method to reduce spam is the heat!

In both of the above setups are spread across 3 machines in a
multi-tiered architecture. Use your DMZ to pre-filter, with Postgrey,
header checks, body checks, then allow to next hop where you can
spam-check, virus check, then allow to local intranet mail server for
local delivery / IMAP.

But if you want to farm it out - use Postini.

-Peter



2008/6/8 Jason Pyeron [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Frank Cox
 Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 4:04 PM
 To: CentOS mailing list
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam

 On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:39:31 -0400
 Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I.e. if a business in Pennsylvania only does business in the lower 48
  there isn't any need to accept port 25 traffic from Asia, Europe, Latin
  America, etc...

 We have foreign language emails from foreign countries, so this and other
 assumptions about content are a big no-no.


 Until something comes up and your users and/or customers are sunk.


 Ditto.

 We are using Postini. It is a spam filtering service from Google at 3$ per
 email address (aliases are free) per year. We have no load they are
 promising the API will be re-enabled in the upcoming weeks.

 We have only had 2 messages with a false positive and one with a false
 negative. Mail volume is around 10,000 messages per day. Latency is next to
 zero.

 Sorry for the advert, but its what we are using.

 Jason


 --
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 -   -
 - Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
 - Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street #100-
 - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
 -   -
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

 This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
 privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you
 have received it in error, purge the message from your system and
 notify the sender immediately.  Any other use of the email by you
 is prohibited.

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam

2008-06-08 Thread Mark Weaver
Alain Terriault wrote:
 Hi,
 
 What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
 
 On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
 good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.

have you considered using geo-blocking in concert with SpamAssassin and
the Sendmail MTA? Works wonders and as such doesn't require as much
attention to the SpamAssassin rules because you're not getting as much
shit to deal with, therefore you're not spending as much time adjusting
and adding rules to SA.

I.e. if a business in Pennsylvania only does business in the lower 48
there isn't any need to accept port 25 traffic from Asia, Europe, Latin
America, etc...

-- 
Mark

Ignorance, like Reality, is a matter of perspective.

- If more people used Linux, Gas would be cheaper!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam

2008-06-08 Thread Frank Cox
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:39:31 -0400
Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I.e. if a business in Pennsylvania only does business in the lower 48
 there isn't any need to accept port 25 traffic from Asia, Europe, Latin
 America, etc...

Until something comes up and your users and/or customers are sunk.

I'm the IT department for a small company that does local classified ads.  No
news, just classified ads -- cars, boats, quilts, that kind of thing.  Local
interest only?  There are paying customers who subscribe to the online edition
of this paper from many countries around the world, from Ireland to Malaysia.

I would really hesitate to block email by geographic location alone; you never
know where your customers are going to come from.  Even if it's a locally
performed service like plumbing or siding installation -- perhaps someone is
moving to your area and doing some advance planning and you could miss the
opportunity to provide a quote or information and gain a customer.


-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] sendmail and spam

2008-06-08 Thread Jason Pyeron


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Frank Cox
 Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 4:04 PM
 To: CentOS mailing list
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam
 
 On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:39:31 -0400
 Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I.e. if a business in Pennsylvania only does business in the lower 48
  there isn't any need to accept port 25 traffic from Asia, Europe, Latin
  America, etc...

We have foreign language emails from foreign countries, so this and other
assumptions about content are a big no-no.

 
 Until something comes up and your users and/or customers are sunk.
 

Ditto.

We are using Postini. It is a spam filtering service from Google at 3$ per
email address (aliases are free) per year. We have no load they are
promising the API will be re-enabled in the upcoming weeks.

We have only had 2 messages with a false positive and one with a false
negative. Mail volume is around 10,000 messages per day. Latency is next to
zero.

Sorry for the advert, but its what we are using.

Jason


--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-   -
- Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street #100-
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
-   -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you
have received it in error, purge the message from your system and
notify the sender immediately.  Any other use of the email by you
is prohibited.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam

2008-06-05 Thread Manish Kathuria


On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 16:53 -0400, Alain Terriault wrote:
 Hi,
 
 What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
 
 On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
 good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
 
 Looking around I found new players, well some I did not know then and
 they are very interesting..
 
 MailScanner .. http://www.mailscanner.info/
 Sagator .. http://www.salstar.sk/sagator/
 Smf .. http://smfs.sourceforge.net/index.html
 dspam .. http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com/index.shtml
 
 I am tempted to go with smfs because it is familiar .. but, mailscanner
 seems popular
 
 thanks,
 alain

I would recommend using Postfix along with Amavisd-new which in turn
would invoke Spamassassin for spam filtering. You can also use an anti
virus program like Clam AV with it to filter for viruses also. I have
experienced excellent performance using this combination with lesser
utilization of system resources as compared to sendmail.

As suggested by many others, you must also configure a couple of RBLs
which will actually reject a major part of the incoming spam / junk mail
and leave very little for subsequent filtering.

--
Manish

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam

2008-06-05 Thread Michel van Deventer
Hi,

On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 00:23 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
 Alain Terriault wrote:
 
  What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
  
  On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
  good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
  
  Looking around I found new players, well some I did not know then and
  they are very interesting..
  
  MailScanner .. http://www.mailscanner.info/
  Sagator .. http://www.salstar.sk/sagator/
  Smf .. http://smfs.sourceforge.net/index.html
  dspam .. http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com/index.shtml
  
  I am tempted to go with smfs because it is familiar .. but, mailscanner
  seems popular
 
 Another good choice is MimeDefang (http://www.mimedefang.org/).
 There are rpms of it and clamav in the rpmforge repo.
 
I use a combination of Postfix with rbl, spamassassin, clamav and
amavisd. It filters about 95-98% of my spam. I also have a spamcop
account to report the spam that gets through.

Regards,

Michel


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] sendmail and spam .. thanks

2008-06-05 Thread Alain Terriault, Mr.
Thanks, This is a very useful mailing list and CentOS works like charm
on PowerEdge hardware.
Merci, alain

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] sendmail and spam

2008-06-04 Thread Alain Terriault
Hi,

What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?

On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.

Looking around I found new players, well some I did not know then and
they are very interesting..

MailScanner .. http://www.mailscanner.info/
Sagator .. http://www.salstar.sk/sagator/
Smf .. http://smfs.sourceforge.net/index.html
dspam .. http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com/index.shtml

I am tempted to go with smfs because it is familiar .. but, mailscanner
seems popular

thanks,
alain

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam

2008-06-04 Thread Kirk Bocek
Alain Terriault wrote:
 Hi,
 
 What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
 
 On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
 good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
 
 Looking around I found new players, well some I did not know then and
 they are very interesting..
 
 MailScanner .. http://www.mailscanner.info/
 Sagator .. http://www.salstar.sk/sagator/
 Smf .. http://smfs.sourceforge.net/index.html
 dspam .. http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com/index.shtml
 
 I am tempted to go with smfs because it is familiar .. but, mailscanner
 seems popular

I've been very happy using the RBLs with Sendmail. In sendmail.mc add:

dnl #
dnl # dnsbl - DNS based Blackhole List/Black List/Rejection list
dnl # See http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html#dnsbl
dnl #
FEATURE(`dnsbl', `bl.spamcop.net', `Spam blocked see:
http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?${client_addr}')dnl
FEATURE(`dnsbl', `cbl.abuseat.org', `Spam blocked see:
http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=${client_addr}')dnl
FEATURE(`dnsbl', `sbl.spamhaus.org', `Spam blocked see:
http://spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=${client_addr}')dnl
FEATURE(`dnsbl', `list.dsbl.org', `Spam blocked see:
http://dsbl.org/listing?${client_addr}')dnl
FEATURE(`dnsbl',`dnsbl.sorbs.net',`554 Spam blocked  ${client_addr}  found
in dnsbl.sorbs.net')dnl
dnl #
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam

2008-06-04 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 16:53 -0400, Alain Terriault wrote:
 Hi,
 
 What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
 
 On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
 good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
 
 Looking around I found new players, well some I did not know then and
 they are very interesting..
 
 MailScanner .. http://www.mailscanner.info/
 Sagator .. http://www.salstar.sk/sagator/
 Smf .. http://smfs.sourceforge.net/index.html
 dspam .. http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com/index.shtml
 
 I am tempted to go with smfs because it is familiar .. but, mailscanner
 seems popular

I use MailScanner but it still uses spamassassin.

I use postfix and greylisting and block e-mails that coming from hosts
that don't resolve by reverse dns or for that matter don't have valid
hostnames. I also use some rbl's.

Those things alone and greylisting knock down most of it so spamassassin
has a much lighter load and MailScanner is awesome.

Craig

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam

2008-06-04 Thread Paul Heinlein

On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Alain Terriault wrote:


What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?


We use a three-way combination (on a CentOS 5 base), in this order:

  1. sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
  2. clamav-milter
  3. spamass-milter (milter-ized spamassassin)

Our server only handles about 50 user accounts, so it's not an 
industrial-strength setup by any means -- though our uptime is well 
above our internal SLA, and most of our employees have a fairly active 
e-mail life. :-)


All bounces happen during the SMTP transaction, so there's no 
backscatter problem.


In a typical week, spamhaus will block ca. 60% of inbound traffic, 
spamassassin 10%, and ClamAV 2-3%. We end up delivering only about 25% 
of the messages we receive from the Internet.


We use rpmforge packages for everything.

--
Paul Heinlein  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.madboa.com/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam

2008-06-04 Thread Michael Nelson

Craig White wrote:

Those things alone and greylisting knock down most of it so spamassassin
has a much lighter load and MailScanner is awesome.


Since I set up milter-greylist we went from 90% spam daily to  10%, and 
that part is easily handled by spamassassin.  Load on the mail server is 
way lower too.


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam

2008-06-04 Thread Les Mikesell
Alain Terriault wrote:

 What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
 
 On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
 good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
 
 Looking around I found new players, well some I did not know then and
 they are very interesting..
 
 MailScanner .. http://www.mailscanner.info/
 Sagator .. http://www.salstar.sk/sagator/
 Smf .. http://smfs.sourceforge.net/index.html
 dspam .. http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com/index.shtml
 
 I am tempted to go with smfs because it is familiar .. but, mailscanner
 seems popular

Another good choice is MimeDefang (http://www.mimedefang.org/).
There are rpms of it and clamav in the rpmforge repo.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos