Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
Hello Karanbir, On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:43 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 08/18/2012 05:21 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > Anyway, I'm afraid most of the missing updates and packages I reported > > just now are actual issues. > > > > what missing updates are you talking about ? your last few emails about > missing packages was down to your script not working and you not > considering binary / source relationships. Yes, my mail above predates Johnny's final conclusion. Indeed all packages are accounted for. Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > >>> We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on > >>> servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have > >>> occurred > >>> on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers. > >>> > >>> On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the > >>> expected graphical login until the mouse pointer is moved within the > >>> boundaries of the vncviewer window. At this point the window closes > >>> and > >>> an error message appears in both a pop-up window and in the terminal > >>> window in which the session was initiated stating "read: Connection > >>> reset by peer (104)". > >>> > >>> On the server end, a core dump is generated and a abrt bug report is > >>> created. > >>> > >>> /var/log/messages > >>> -- > >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: File '/usr/bin/Xorg' seems to be > >>> deleted > >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: Saved core dump of pid 7892 > >>> (/usr/bin/Xorg) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892 > >>> (42041344 bytes) > >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892' > >>> creation detected > >>> -- > >>> > >>> This bug has been reported in the CentOS bug tracker here: > >>> > >>> 0005824: tigervnc-server-module keep crashing > >>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5824 > >>> > >>> However, this appears to be a bug upstream. The source RPM provided > >>> with > >>> CentOS is identical to that of upstream with no modifications. Also, > >>> there is an upstream bug reported that appears to have the same > >>> symptoms. I have added a comment to the upstream bug report (listed > >>> below) if anyone wishes to see the details. > >>> > >>> tigervnc-server-module crashes with dual screen setup > >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820443 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> We have verified that rebuilding the unmodified source RPM for > >>> tigervnc > >>> produces a tigervnc-server-module RPM that does not suffer from this > >>> bug. > >>> > >>> Removing the original tigervnc-server-module package and replacing it > >>> with the rebuilt one fixes the problem. > >>> > >>> I've duplicated the problem on 2 EL 6.3 x86_64 single-head display > >>> machines and have verified the fix. > >>> > >>> Tomorrow, I'll duplicate the problem on a dual-head x86_64 machine > >>> that > >>> currently still works after updating to EL 6.2 then confirm the the > >>> fix. > >>> > >> Did you rebuild the SRPM using mock or directly on a physical machine > >> with rpmbuild? > > No mock, just a simple "rpmbuild -ba SPEC/tigervnc.spec" > OK, if you find that this solves your problems for sure, I will build > the SRPM outside of mock and see if it is different. > >>> I've confirmed the same faulty behavior for the update to 6.3 on our > >>> dual-head systems. > >>> > >>> Also confirmed is that replacing the 6.3 base tigervnc-server-module rpm > >>> with the rebuilt one does fix the problem on the dual-head systems. > >>> > >>> One disturbing difference between single and dual headed systems is that > >>> on the dual-head systems Xorg generates a core dump and completely > >>> freezes up when the mouse movement is detected. Single-head systems just > >>> fail to connect. This complication could be somehow caused by our > >>> proprietary "ATI FirePro 2270" drivers, though. Once the rebuilt module > >>> is installed the systems run fine. > >>> > >>> I've also updated the upstream bug report. > >> can you see if either or both of these work for you: > >> > >> http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/tigervnc/ > >> > >> One set was built inside of mock, the other outside of mock in a virtual > >> machine with only the build requirements of the SRPM installed. > > Both builds work without problems on single and dual-head systems here. > > As with all the other tests, I only replaced the tigervnc-server-module > > package on each host. > > > > I've also confirmed that i686 platforms suffer from the same bug. These > > too, however, are easily remedied by replacing the base > > tigervnc-server-module RPM with a locally re-build one. > > Would you also test that these work: > > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/tigervnc/ > > (same link, newer files :D) > > NOTE: It is C
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
On 08/18/2012 05:21 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Anyway, I'm afraid most of the missing updates and packages I reported > just now are actual issues. > what missing updates are you talking about ? your last few emails about missing packages was down to your script not working and you not considering binary / source relationships. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > >>> We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on > >>> servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have > >>> occurred > >>> on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers. > >>> > >>> On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the > >>> expected graphical login until the mouse pointer is moved within the > >>> boundaries of the vncviewer window. At this point the window closes > >>> and > >>> an error message appears in both a pop-up window and in the terminal > >>> window in which the session was initiated stating "read: Connection > >>> reset by peer (104)". > >>> > >>> On the server end, a core dump is generated and a abrt bug report is > >>> created. > >>> > >>> /var/log/messages > >>> -- > >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: File '/usr/bin/Xorg' seems to be > >>> deleted > >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: Saved core dump of pid 7892 > >>> (/usr/bin/Xorg) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892 > >>> (42041344 bytes) > >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892' > >>> creation detected > >>> -- > >>> > >>> This bug has been reported in the CentOS bug tracker here: > >>> > >>> 0005824: tigervnc-server-module keep crashing > >>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5824 > >>> > >>> However, this appears to be a bug upstream. The source RPM provided > >>> with > >>> CentOS is identical to that of upstream with no modifications. Also, > >>> there is an upstream bug reported that appears to have the same > >>> symptoms. I have added a comment to the upstream bug report (listed > >>> below) if anyone wishes to see the details. > >>> > >>> tigervnc-server-module crashes with dual screen setup > >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820443 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> We have verified that rebuilding the unmodified source RPM for > >>> tigervnc > >>> produces a tigervnc-server-module RPM that does not suffer from this > >>> bug. > >>> > >>> Removing the original tigervnc-server-module package and replacing it > >>> with the rebuilt one fixes the problem. > >>> > >>> I've duplicated the problem on 2 EL 6.3 x86_64 single-head display > >>> machines and have verified the fix. > >>> > >>> Tomorrow, I'll duplicate the problem on a dual-head x86_64 machine > >>> that > >>> currently still works after updating to EL 6.2 then confirm the the > >>> fix. > >>> > >> Did you rebuild the SRPM using mock or directly on a physical machine > >> with rpmbuild? > > No mock, just a simple "rpmbuild -ba SPEC/tigervnc.spec" > OK, if you find that this solves your problems for sure, I will build > the SRPM outside of mock and see if it is different. > >>> I've confirmed the same faulty behavior for the update to 6.3 on our > >>> dual-head systems. > >>> > >>> Also confirmed is that replacing the 6.3 base tigervnc-server-module rpm > >>> with the rebuilt one does fix the problem on the dual-head systems. > >>> > >>> One disturbing difference between single and dual headed systems is that > >>> on the dual-head systems Xorg generates a core dump and completely > >>> freezes up when the mouse movement is detected. Single-head systems just > >>> fail to connect. This complication could be somehow caused by our > >>> proprietary "ATI FirePro 2270" drivers, though. Once the rebuilt module > >>> is installed the systems run fine. > >>> > >>> I've also updated the upstream bug report. > >> can you see if either or both of these work for you: > >> > >> http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/tigervnc/ > >> > >> One set was built inside of mock, the other outside of mock in a virtual > >> machine with only the build requirements of the SRPM installed. > > Both builds work without problems on single and dual-head systems here. > > As with all the other tests, I only replaced the tigervnc-server-module > > package on each host. > > > > I've also confirmed that i686 platforms suffer from the same bug. These > > too, however, are easily remedied by replacing the base > > tigervnc-server-module RPM with a locally re-build one. > > Would you also test that these work: > > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/tigervnc/ > > (same link, newer files :D) > > NOTE: It is C
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > >>> We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on > >>> servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have > >>> occurred > >>> on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers. > >>> > >>> On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the > >>> expected graphical login until the mouse pointer is moved within the > >>> boundaries of the vncviewer window. At this point the window closes > >>> and > >>> an error message appears in both a pop-up window and in the terminal > >>> window in which the session was initiated stating "read: Connection > >>> reset by peer (104)". > >>> > >>> On the server end, a core dump is generated and a abrt bug report is > >>> created. > >>> > >>> /var/log/messages > >>> -- > >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: File '/usr/bin/Xorg' seems to be > >>> deleted > >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: Saved core dump of pid 7892 > >>> (/usr/bin/Xorg) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892 > >>> (42041344 bytes) > >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892' > >>> creation detected > >>> -- > >>> > >>> This bug has been reported in the CentOS bug tracker here: > >>> > >>> 0005824: tigervnc-server-module keep crashing > >>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5824 > >>> > >>> However, this appears to be a bug upstream. The source RPM provided > >>> with > >>> CentOS is identical to that of upstream with no modifications. Also, > >>> there is an upstream bug reported that appears to have the same > >>> symptoms. I have added a comment to the upstream bug report (listed > >>> below) if anyone wishes to see the details. > >>> > >>> tigervnc-server-module crashes with dual screen setup > >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820443 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> We have verified that rebuilding the unmodified source RPM for > >>> tigervnc > >>> produces a tigervnc-server-module RPM that does not suffer from this > >>> bug. > >>> > >>> Removing the original tigervnc-server-module package and replacing it > >>> with the rebuilt one fixes the problem. > >>> > >>> I've duplicated the problem on 2 EL 6.3 x86_64 single-head display > >>> machines and have verified the fix. > >>> > >>> Tomorrow, I'll duplicate the problem on a dual-head x86_64 machine > >>> that > >>> currently still works after updating to EL 6.2 then confirm the the > >>> fix. > >>> > >> Did you rebuild the SRPM using mock or directly on a physical machine > >> with rpmbuild? > > No mock, just a simple "rpmbuild -ba SPEC/tigervnc.spec" > OK, if you find that this solves your problems for sure, I will build > the SRPM outside of mock and see if it is different. > >>> I've confirmed the same faulty behavior for the update to 6.3 on our > >>> dual-head systems. > >>> > >>> Also confirmed is that replacing the 6.3 base tigervnc-server-module rpm > >>> with the rebuilt one does fix the problem on the dual-head systems. > >>> > >>> One disturbing difference between single and dual headed systems is that > >>> on the dual-head systems Xorg generates a core dump and completely > >>> freezes up when the mouse movement is detected. Single-head systems just > >>> fail to connect. This complication could be somehow caused by our > >>> proprietary "ATI FirePro 2270" drivers, though. Once the rebuilt module > >>> is installed the systems run fine. > >>> > >>> I've also updated the upstream bug report. > >> can you see if either or both of these work for you: > >> > >> http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/tigervnc/ > >> > >> One set was built inside of mock, the other outside of mock in a virtual > >> machine with only the build requirements of the SRPM installed. > > Both builds work without problems on single and dual-head systems here. > > As with all the other tests, I only replaced the tigervnc-server-module > > package on each host. > > > > I've also confirmed that i686 platforms suffer from the same bug. These > > too, however, are easily remedied by replacing the base > > tigervnc-server-module RPM with a locally re-build one. > > Would you also test that these work: > > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/tigervnc/ > > (same link, newer files :D) > > NOTE: It is C
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
Hello Akemi, On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 08:59 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > That srpm is dated 06/13/2011 (from year 2011). The latest/current > (tigervnc-1.0.90-0.17.20110314svn4359.el6.src.rpm) is dated 11/09/2011 > (also from year 2011). Note also the difference between -0.15 and > -0.17. :-) Right, my bad. Too many numbers got me confused ;) . Does explain why my script didn't pick it up :) . Anyway, I'm afraid most of the missing updates and packages I reported just now are actual issues. Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/tigervnc-1.0.90-0.15.20110314svn4359.el6_1.1.src.rpm > > Seems like this update wasn't picked up even though it's two months old, > and the previous (current) one was rebuilt three months after it was > released by upstream. That srpm is dated 06/13/2011 (from year 2011). The latest/current (tigervnc-1.0.90-0.17.20110314svn4359.el6.src.rpm) is dated 11/09/2011 (also from year 2011). Note also the difference between -0.15 and -0.17. :-) Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
Hi guys, Could you be so kind to trim those quotes a little? On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:40 -0400, Cal Webster wrote: > Both builds work without problems on single and dual-head systems > here. > As with all the other tests, I only replaced the > tigervnc-server-module > package on each host. Something in the bug report struck me as odd: The original report is from May 9th. Checking Red Hat's FTP I see there is a more recent SRPM than the one you are discussing. ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/tigervnc-1.0.90-0.15.20110314svn4359.el6_1.1.src.rpm Seems like this update wasn't picked up even though it's two months old, and the previous (current) one was rebuilt three months after it was released by upstream. Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote: >>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote: >>> We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on >>> servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred >>> on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers. >>> >>> On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the >>> expected graphical login until the mouse pointer is moved within the >>> boundaries of the vncviewer window. At this point the window closes and >>> an error message appears in both a pop-up window and in the terminal >>> window in which the session was initiated stating "read: Connection >>> reset by peer (104)". >>> >>> On the server end, a core dump is generated and a abrt bug report is >>> created. >>> >>> /var/log/messages >>> -- >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: File '/usr/bin/Xorg' seems to be >>> deleted >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: Saved core dump of pid 7892 >>> (/usr/bin/Xorg) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892 >>> (42041344 bytes) >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892' >>> creation detected >>> -- >>> >>> This bug has been reported in the CentOS bug tracker here: >>> >>> 0005824: tigervnc-server-module keep crashing >>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5824 >>> >>> However, this appears to be a bug upstream. The source RPM provided with >>> CentOS is identical to that of upstream with no modifications. Also, >>> there is an upstream bug reported that appears to have the same >>> symptoms. I have added a comment to the upstream bug report (listed >>> below) if anyone wishes to see the details. >>> >>> tigervnc-server-module crashes with dual screen setup >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820443 >>> >>> >>> >>> We have verified that rebuilding the unmodified source RPM for tigervnc >>> produces a tigervnc-server-module RPM that does not suffer from this >>> bug. >>> >>> Removing the original tigervnc-server-module package and replacing it >>> with the rebuilt one fixes the problem. >>> >>> I've duplicated the problem on 2 EL 6.3 x86_64 single-head display >>> machines and have verified the fix. >>> >>> Tomorrow, I'll duplicate the problem on a dual-head x86_64 machine that >>> currently still works after updating to EL 6.2 then confirm the the fix. >>> >> Did you rebuild the SRPM using mock or directly on a physical machine >> with rpmbuild? > No mock, just a simple "rpmbuild -ba SPEC/tigervnc.spec" OK, if you find that this solves your problems for sure, I will build the SRPM outside of mock and see if it is different. >>> I've confirmed the same faulty behavior for the update to 6.3 on our >>> dual-head systems. >>> >>> Also confirmed is that replacing the 6.3 base tigervnc-server-module rpm >>> with the rebuilt one does fix the problem on the dual-head systems. >>> >>> One disturbing difference between single and dual headed systems is that >>> on the dual-head systems Xorg generates a core dump and completely >>> freezes up when the mouse movement is detected. Single-head systems just >>> fail to connect. This complication could be somehow caused by our >>> proprietary "ATI FirePro 2270" drivers, though. Once the rebuilt module >>> is installed the systems run fine. >>> >>> I've also updated the upstream bug report. >> can you see if either or both of these work for you: >> >> http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/tigervnc/ >> >> One set was built inside of mock, the other outside of mock in a virtual >> machine with only the build requirements of the SRPM installed. > Both builds work without problems on single and dual-head systems here. > As with all the other tests, I only replaced the tigervnc-server-module > package on each host. > > I've also confirmed that i686 platforms suffer from the same bug. These > too, however, are easily remedied by replacing the base > tigervnc-server-module RPM with a locally re-build one. Would you also test that these work: http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/tigervnc/ (same link, newer files :D) NOTE: It is CentOS policy that we do not correct upstream bugs in our distributions directly ... therefore these will not be released into the main distro until upstream releases an update. I know that is a PITA for people, however, it is our policy and we can't break it. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote: >>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote: >>> We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on >>> servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred >>> on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers. >>> >>> On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the >>> expected graphical login until the mouse pointer is moved within the >>> boundaries of the vncviewer window. At this point the window closes and >>> an error message appears in both a pop-up window and in the terminal >>> window in which the session was initiated stating "read: Connection >>> reset by peer (104)". >>> >>> On the server end, a core dump is generated and a abrt bug report is >>> created. >>> >>> /var/log/messages >>> -- >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: File '/usr/bin/Xorg' seems to be >>> deleted >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: Saved core dump of pid 7892 >>> (/usr/bin/Xorg) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892 >>> (42041344 bytes) >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892' >>> creation detected >>> -- >>> >>> This bug has been reported in the CentOS bug tracker here: >>> >>> 0005824: tigervnc-server-module keep crashing >>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5824 >>> >>> However, this appears to be a bug upstream. The source RPM provided with >>> CentOS is identical to that of upstream with no modifications. Also, >>> there is an upstream bug reported that appears to have the same >>> symptoms. I have added a comment to the upstream bug report (listed >>> below) if anyone wishes to see the details. >>> >>> tigervnc-server-module crashes with dual screen setup >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820443 >>> >>> >>> >>> We have verified that rebuilding the unmodified source RPM for tigervnc >>> produces a tigervnc-server-module RPM that does not suffer from this >>> bug. >>> >>> Removing the original tigervnc-server-module package and replacing it >>> with the rebuilt one fixes the problem. >>> >>> I've duplicated the problem on 2 EL 6.3 x86_64 single-head display >>> machines and have verified the fix. >>> >>> Tomorrow, I'll duplicate the problem on a dual-head x86_64 machine that >>> currently still works after updating to EL 6.2 then confirm the the fix. >>> >> Did you rebuild the SRPM using mock or directly on a physical machine >> with rpmbuild? > No mock, just a simple "rpmbuild -ba SPEC/tigervnc.spec" OK, if you find that this solves your problems for sure, I will build the SRPM outside of mock and see if it is different. >>> I've confirmed the same faulty behavior for the update to 6.3 on our >>> dual-head systems. >>> >>> Also confirmed is that replacing the 6.3 base tigervnc-server-module rpm >>> with the rebuilt one does fix the problem on the dual-head systems. >>> >>> One disturbing difference between single and dual headed systems is that >>> on the dual-head systems Xorg generates a core dump and completely >>> freezes up when the mouse movement is detected. Single-head systems just >>> fail to connect. This complication could be somehow caused by our >>> proprietary "ATI FirePro 2270" drivers, though. Once the rebuilt module >>> is installed the systems run fine. >>> >>> I've also updated the upstream bug report. >> can you see if either or both of these work for you: >> >> http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/tigervnc/ >> >> One set was built inside of mock, the other outside of mock in a virtual >> machine with only the build requirements of the SRPM installed. > Both builds work without problems on single and dual-head systems here. > As with all the other tests, I only replaced the tigervnc-server-module > package on each host. > > I've also confirmed that i686 platforms suffer from the same bug. These > too, however, are easily remedied by replacing the base > tigervnc-server-module RPM with a locally re-build one. > > ./Cal Thanks for testing. I will build a new version for release with an incremented version and get you to test those before for release if you would do so for me. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > > We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on > > servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred > > on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers. > > > > On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the > > expected graphical login until the mouse pointer is moved within the > > boundaries of the vncviewer window. At this point the window closes and > > an error message appears in both a pop-up window and in the terminal > > window in which the session was initiated stating "read: Connection > > reset by peer (104)". > > > > On the server end, a core dump is generated and a abrt bug report is > > created. > > > > /var/log/messages > > -- > > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: File '/usr/bin/Xorg' seems to be > > deleted > > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: Saved core dump of pid 7892 > > (/usr/bin/Xorg) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892 > > (42041344 bytes) > > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892' > > creation detected > > -- > > > > This bug has been reported in the CentOS bug tracker here: > > > > 0005824: tigervnc-server-module keep crashing > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5824 > > > > However, this appears to be a bug upstream. The source RPM provided with > > CentOS is identical to that of upstream with no modifications. Also, > > there is an upstream bug reported that appears to have the same > > symptoms. I have added a comment to the upstream bug report (listed > > below) if anyone wishes to see the details. > > > > tigervnc-server-module crashes with dual screen setup > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820443 > > > > > > > > We have verified that rebuilding the unmodified source RPM for tigervnc > > produces a tigervnc-server-module RPM that does not suffer from this > > bug. > > > > Removing the original tigervnc-server-module package and replacing it > > with the rebuilt one fixes the problem. > > > > I've duplicated the problem on 2 EL 6.3 x86_64 single-head display > > machines and have verified the fix. > > > > Tomorrow, I'll duplicate the problem on a dual-head x86_64 machine that > > currently still works after updating to EL 6.2 then confirm the the fix. > > > Did you rebuild the SRPM using mock or directly on a physical machine > with rpmbuild? > >>> No mock, just a simple "rpmbuild -ba SPEC/tigervnc.spec" > >> OK, if you find that this solves your problems for sure, I will build > >> the SRPM outside of mock and see if it is different. > > I've confirmed the same faulty behavior for the update to 6.3 on our > > dual-head systems. > > > > Also confirmed is that replacing the 6.3 base tigervnc-server-module rpm > > with the rebuilt one does fix the problem on the dual-head systems. > > > > One disturbing difference between single and dual headed systems is that > > on the dual-head systems Xorg generates a core dump and completely > > freezes up when the mouse movement is detected. Single-head systems just > > fail to connect. This complication could be somehow caused by our > > proprietary "ATI FirePro 2270" drivers, though. Once the rebuilt module > > is installed the systems run fine. > > > > I've also updated the upstream bug report. > > can you see if either or both of these work for you: > > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/tigervnc/ > > One set was built inside of mock, the other outside of mock in a virtual > machine with only the build requirements of the SRPM installed. Both builds work without problems on single and dual-head systems here. As with all the other tests, I only replaced the tigervnc-server-module package on each host. I've also confirmed that i686 platforms suffer from the same bug. These too, however, are easily remedied by replacing the base tigervnc-server-module RPM with a locally re-build one. ./Cal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > > We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on > > servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred > > on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers. > > > > On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the > > expected graphical login until the mouse pointer is moved within the > > boundaries of the vncviewer window. At this point the window closes and > > an error message appears in both a pop-up window and in the terminal > > window in which the session was initiated stating "read: Connection > > reset by peer (104)". > > > > On the server end, a core dump is generated and a abrt bug report is > > created. > > > > /var/log/messages > > -- > > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: File '/usr/bin/Xorg' seems to be > > deleted > > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: Saved core dump of pid 7892 > > (/usr/bin/Xorg) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892 > > (42041344 bytes) > > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892' > > creation detected > > -- > > > > This bug has been reported in the CentOS bug tracker here: > > > > 0005824: tigervnc-server-module keep crashing > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5824 > > > > However, this appears to be a bug upstream. The source RPM provided with > > CentOS is identical to that of upstream with no modifications. Also, > > there is an upstream bug reported that appears to have the same > > symptoms. I have added a comment to the upstream bug report (listed > > below) if anyone wishes to see the details. > > > > tigervnc-server-module crashes with dual screen setup > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820443 > > > > > > > > We have verified that rebuilding the unmodified source RPM for tigervnc > > produces a tigervnc-server-module RPM that does not suffer from this > > bug. > > > > Removing the original tigervnc-server-module package and replacing it > > with the rebuilt one fixes the problem. > > > > I've duplicated the problem on 2 EL 6.3 x86_64 single-head display > > machines and have verified the fix. > > > > Tomorrow, I'll duplicate the problem on a dual-head x86_64 machine that > > currently still works after updating to EL 6.2 then confirm the the fix. > > > Did you rebuild the SRPM using mock or directly on a physical machine > with rpmbuild? > >>> No mock, just a simple "rpmbuild -ba SPEC/tigervnc.spec" > >> OK, if you find that this solves your problems for sure, I will build > >> the SRPM outside of mock and see if it is different. > > I've confirmed the same faulty behavior for the update to 6.3 on our > > dual-head systems. > > > > Also confirmed is that replacing the 6.3 base tigervnc-server-module rpm > > with the rebuilt one does fix the problem on the dual-head systems. > > > > One disturbing difference between single and dual headed systems is that > > on the dual-head systems Xorg generates a core dump and completely > > freezes up when the mouse movement is detected. Single-head systems just > > fail to connect. This complication could be somehow caused by our > > proprietary "ATI FirePro 2270" drivers, though. Once the rebuilt module > > is installed the systems run fine. > > > > I've also updated the upstream bug report. > > can you see if either or both of these work for you: > > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/tigervnc/ > > One set was built inside of mock, the other outside of mock in a virtual > machine with only the build requirements of the SRPM installed. I'll try first thing in the morning Johnny. Wife's waitin' on me. :-) ./Cal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote: >>> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on > servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred > on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers. > > On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the > expected graphical login until the mouse pointer is moved within the > boundaries of the vncviewer window. At this point the window closes and > an error message appears in both a pop-up window and in the terminal > window in which the session was initiated stating "read: Connection > reset by peer (104)". > > On the server end, a core dump is generated and a abrt bug report is > created. > > /var/log/messages > -- > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: File '/usr/bin/Xorg' seems to be > deleted > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: Saved core dump of pid 7892 > (/usr/bin/Xorg) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892 > (42041344 bytes) > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892' > creation detected > -- > > This bug has been reported in the CentOS bug tracker here: > > 0005824: tigervnc-server-module keep crashing > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5824 > > However, this appears to be a bug upstream. The source RPM provided with > CentOS is identical to that of upstream with no modifications. Also, > there is an upstream bug reported that appears to have the same > symptoms. I have added a comment to the upstream bug report (listed > below) if anyone wishes to see the details. > > tigervnc-server-module crashes with dual screen setup > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820443 > > > > We have verified that rebuilding the unmodified source RPM for tigervnc > produces a tigervnc-server-module RPM that does not suffer from this > bug. > > Removing the original tigervnc-server-module package and replacing it > with the rebuilt one fixes the problem. > > I've duplicated the problem on 2 EL 6.3 x86_64 single-head display > machines and have verified the fix. > > Tomorrow, I'll duplicate the problem on a dual-head x86_64 machine that > currently still works after updating to EL 6.2 then confirm the the fix. > Did you rebuild the SRPM using mock or directly on a physical machine with rpmbuild? >>> No mock, just a simple "rpmbuild -ba SPEC/tigervnc.spec" >> OK, if you find that this solves your problems for sure, I will build >> the SRPM outside of mock and see if it is different. > I've confirmed the same faulty behavior for the update to 6.3 on our > dual-head systems. > > Also confirmed is that replacing the 6.3 base tigervnc-server-module rpm > with the rebuilt one does fix the problem on the dual-head systems. > > One disturbing difference between single and dual headed systems is that > on the dual-head systems Xorg generates a core dump and completely > freezes up when the mouse movement is detected. Single-head systems just > fail to connect. This complication could be somehow caused by our > proprietary "ATI FirePro 2270" drivers, though. Once the rebuilt module > is installed the systems run fine. > > I've also updated the upstream bug report. can you see if either or both of these work for you: http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/tigervnc/ One set was built inside of mock, the other outside of mock in a virtual machine with only the build requirements of the SRPM installed. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > >>> We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on > >>> servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred > >>> on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers. > >>> > >>> On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the > >>> expected graphical login until the mouse pointer is moved within the > >>> boundaries of the vncviewer window. At this point the window closes and > >>> an error message appears in both a pop-up window and in the terminal > >>> window in which the session was initiated stating "read: Connection > >>> reset by peer (104)". > >>> > >>> On the server end, a core dump is generated and a abrt bug report is > >>> created. > >>> > >>> /var/log/messages > >>> -- > >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: File '/usr/bin/Xorg' seems to be > >>> deleted > >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: Saved core dump of pid 7892 > >>> (/usr/bin/Xorg) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892 > >>> (42041344 bytes) > >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892' > >>> creation detected > >>> -- > >>> > >>> This bug has been reported in the CentOS bug tracker here: > >>> > >>> 0005824: tigervnc-server-module keep crashing > >>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5824 > >>> > >>> However, this appears to be a bug upstream. The source RPM provided with > >>> CentOS is identical to that of upstream with no modifications. Also, > >>> there is an upstream bug reported that appears to have the same > >>> symptoms. I have added a comment to the upstream bug report (listed > >>> below) if anyone wishes to see the details. > >>> > >>> tigervnc-server-module crashes with dual screen setup > >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820443 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> We have verified that rebuilding the unmodified source RPM for tigervnc > >>> produces a tigervnc-server-module RPM that does not suffer from this > >>> bug. > >>> > >>> Removing the original tigervnc-server-module package and replacing it > >>> with the rebuilt one fixes the problem. > >>> > >>> I've duplicated the problem on 2 EL 6.3 x86_64 single-head display > >>> machines and have verified the fix. > >>> > >>> Tomorrow, I'll duplicate the problem on a dual-head x86_64 machine that > >>> currently still works after updating to EL 6.2 then confirm the the fix. > >>> > >> Did you rebuild the SRPM using mock or directly on a physical machine > >> with rpmbuild? > > No mock, just a simple "rpmbuild -ba SPEC/tigervnc.spec" > > OK, if you find that this solves your problems for sure, I will build > the SRPM outside of mock and see if it is different. I've confirmed the same faulty behavior for the update to 6.3 on our dual-head systems. Also confirmed is that replacing the 6.3 base tigervnc-server-module rpm with the rebuilt one does fix the problem on the dual-head systems. One disturbing difference between single and dual headed systems is that on the dual-head systems Xorg generates a core dump and completely freezes up when the mouse movement is detected. Single-head systems just fail to connect. This complication could be somehow caused by our proprietary "ATI FirePro 2270" drivers, though. Once the rebuilt module is installed the systems run fine. I've also updated the upstream bug report. ./Cal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote: > On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote: >>> We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on >>> servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred >>> on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers. >>> >>> On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the >>> expected graphical login until the mouse pointer is moved within the >>> boundaries of the vncviewer window. At this point the window closes and >>> an error message appears in both a pop-up window and in the terminal >>> window in which the session was initiated stating "read: Connection >>> reset by peer (104)". >>> >>> On the server end, a core dump is generated and a abrt bug report is >>> created. >>> >>> /var/log/messages >>> -- >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: File '/usr/bin/Xorg' seems to be >>> deleted >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: Saved core dump of pid 7892 >>> (/usr/bin/Xorg) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892 >>> (42041344 bytes) >>> Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892' >>> creation detected >>> -- >>> >>> This bug has been reported in the CentOS bug tracker here: >>> >>> 0005824: tigervnc-server-module keep crashing >>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5824 >>> >>> However, this appears to be a bug upstream. The source RPM provided with >>> CentOS is identical to that of upstream with no modifications. Also, >>> there is an upstream bug reported that appears to have the same >>> symptoms. I have added a comment to the upstream bug report (listed >>> below) if anyone wishes to see the details. >>> >>> tigervnc-server-module crashes with dual screen setup >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820443 >>> >>> >>> >>> We have verified that rebuilding the unmodified source RPM for tigervnc >>> produces a tigervnc-server-module RPM that does not suffer from this >>> bug. >>> >>> Removing the original tigervnc-server-module package and replacing it >>> with the rebuilt one fixes the problem. >>> >>> I've duplicated the problem on 2 EL 6.3 x86_64 single-head display >>> machines and have verified the fix. >>> >>> Tomorrow, I'll duplicate the problem on a dual-head x86_64 machine that >>> currently still works after updating to EL 6.2 then confirm the the fix. >>> >> Did you rebuild the SRPM using mock or directly on a physical machine >> with rpmbuild? > No mock, just a simple "rpmbuild -ba SPEC/tigervnc.spec" OK, if you find that this solves your problems for sure, I will build the SRPM outside of mock and see if it is different. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > > We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on > > servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred > > on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers. > > > > On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the > > expected graphical login until the mouse pointer is moved within the > > boundaries of the vncviewer window. At this point the window closes and > > an error message appears in both a pop-up window and in the terminal > > window in which the session was initiated stating "read: Connection > > reset by peer (104)". > > > > On the server end, a core dump is generated and a abrt bug report is > > created. > > > > /var/log/messages > > -- > > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: File '/usr/bin/Xorg' seems to be > > deleted > > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: Saved core dump of pid 7892 > > (/usr/bin/Xorg) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892 > > (42041344 bytes) > > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892' > > creation detected > > -- > > > > This bug has been reported in the CentOS bug tracker here: > > > > 0005824: tigervnc-server-module keep crashing > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5824 > > > > However, this appears to be a bug upstream. The source RPM provided with > > CentOS is identical to that of upstream with no modifications. Also, > > there is an upstream bug reported that appears to have the same > > symptoms. I have added a comment to the upstream bug report (listed > > below) if anyone wishes to see the details. > > > > tigervnc-server-module crashes with dual screen setup > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820443 > > > > > > > > We have verified that rebuilding the unmodified source RPM for tigervnc > > produces a tigervnc-server-module RPM that does not suffer from this > > bug. > > > > Removing the original tigervnc-server-module package and replacing it > > with the rebuilt one fixes the problem. > > > > I've duplicated the problem on 2 EL 6.3 x86_64 single-head display > > machines and have verified the fix. > > > > Tomorrow, I'll duplicate the problem on a dual-head x86_64 machine that > > currently still works after updating to EL 6.2 then confirm the the fix. > > > > Did you rebuild the SRPM using mock or directly on a physical machine > with rpmbuild? No mock, just a simple "rpmbuild -ba SPEC/tigervnc.spec" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tigervnc-server-module crashes after EL 6.3 update
On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on > servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred > on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers. > > On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the > expected graphical login until the mouse pointer is moved within the > boundaries of the vncviewer window. At this point the window closes and > an error message appears in both a pop-up window and in the terminal > window in which the session was initiated stating "read: Connection > reset by peer (104)". > > On the server end, a core dump is generated and a abrt bug report is > created. > > /var/log/messages > -- > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: File '/usr/bin/Xorg' seems to be > deleted > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrt[11411]: Saved core dump of pid 7892 > (/usr/bin/Xorg) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892 > (42041344 bytes) > Aug 14 11:00:30 jato2 abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2012-08-14-11:00:30-7892' > creation detected > -- > > This bug has been reported in the CentOS bug tracker here: > > 0005824: tigervnc-server-module keep crashing > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5824 > > However, this appears to be a bug upstream. The source RPM provided with > CentOS is identical to that of upstream with no modifications. Also, > there is an upstream bug reported that appears to have the same > symptoms. I have added a comment to the upstream bug report (listed > below) if anyone wishes to see the details. > > tigervnc-server-module crashes with dual screen setup > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820443 > > > > We have verified that rebuilding the unmodified source RPM for tigervnc > produces a tigervnc-server-module RPM that does not suffer from this > bug. > > Removing the original tigervnc-server-module package and replacing it > with the rebuilt one fixes the problem. > > I've duplicated the problem on 2 EL 6.3 x86_64 single-head display > machines and have verified the fix. > > Tomorrow, I'll duplicate the problem on a dual-head x86_64 machine that > currently still works after updating to EL 6.2 then confirm the the fix. > Did you rebuild the SRPM using mock or directly on a physical machine with rpmbuild? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
