Re: Consultant's Revenge

2008-01-31 Thread Justin Edwards
This site sounds like it will take all of your time doing moderation.
One of my friends started a similar site but with mechanics.

Also you might run into problems with profitableness, because the best  
advertising/sponsoring could come from someone who might have people  
on your site who hate them.


On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Joseph Smuzynski wrote:

 After dealing with a few too many disreputable companies, I'm just  
 about
 ready to build a new site that is sort of a cross between
 f*ckedcompany.comand ChexSystems.

 The idea is to have a site where consultants of all types can come and
 anonymously post their negative experiences with various companies,  
 large or
 small.  The hope is that with proper marketing, it will become the  
 first
 place a consultant comes to check out a company before doing work  
 for them.

 If a company ends up with a negative listing, the way they get the  
 listing
 removed is to make good with the consultant, then the consultant can  
 mark
 the case closed.  Naturally, if they have multiple bad entries, they  
 would
 have to make good with everybody.

 The site would not allow inflammatory types of comments about a  
 company;
 only facts.  Each entry would be reviewed and approved before being  
 posted.
 There would have to be supporting data too... for example, let's say a
 company refused to pay your last invoice.  You would need to provide  
 a copy
 of your last invoice and a work log to document it.

 All listings would have to include proof that you actually worked  
 for the
 company... e.g. copies of pay stubs, a copy of the contract, etc.   
 Otherwise
 the site could be used for extortion and would lose it's advantage  
 because
 it wouldn't be taken seriously.

 So, the point is to help show companies that they have to treat  
 consultants
 well... pay their people what they're owed, treat them kindly, etc.
 Otherwise these companies may find themselves unable to get people  
 to work
 for them anymore.

 I don't see this being a lawsuit magnet either.  Each posting would  
 have to
 be factual, not emotional.  No slanderous or libelous remarks.  Just  
 facts.
 It would boil down to the consultant's word against the company.   
 No names
 of people would be mentioned, so you couldn't call people out by  
 name.  You
 could go as far as to say your supervisor was a micro-manager but  
 you
 couldn't say, my supervisor, Bill Smith, was a micro-manager and  
 was always
 giving me a hard time.

 Sure, the easier way is to just post about 'em here on cf-jobs-talk,  
 but
 then you're likely to end up with a bad rap since a lot of job  
 posters read
 this list too, no doubt looking for anybody who might be willing to  
 speak
 out.

 I haven't really decided what to call the site either.  I'm not even  
 sure
 yet if I'll do it; I'm curious to hear what others think of the idea.

 Joe


 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:3588
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.11


Re: Consultant's Revenge

2008-01-31 Thread Jeffry Houser
  It sounds like a lawsuit trap to me.
  The only way to keep it factual is if you moderate posts and control 
what people say.  Once you do that, then you are no longer protected 
under safe harbor provisions.

  All that said, even if you're in the right in terms of free speech, 
that won't protect you from getting sued.


  All that said, I'm surprised something like this doesn't already exist.

Joseph Smuzynski wrote:
 After dealing with a few too many disreputable companies, I'm just about
 ready to build a new site that is sort of a cross between
 f*ckedcompany.comand ChexSystems.
 
 The idea is to have a site where consultants of all types can come and
 anonymously post their negative experiences with various companies, large or
 small.  The hope is that with proper marketing, it will become the first
 place a consultant comes to check out a company before doing work for them.
 
 If a company ends up with a negative listing, the way they get the listing
 removed is to make good with the consultant, then the consultant can mark
 the case closed.  Naturally, if they have multiple bad entries, they would
 have to make good with everybody.
 
 The site would not allow inflammatory types of comments about a company;
 only facts.  Each entry would be reviewed and approved before being posted.
 There would have to be supporting data too... for example, let's say a
 company refused to pay your last invoice.  You would need to provide a copy
 of your last invoice and a work log to document it.
 
 All listings would have to include proof that you actually worked for the
 company... e.g. copies of pay stubs, a copy of the contract, etc.  Otherwise
 the site could be used for extortion and would lose it's advantage because
 it wouldn't be taken seriously.
 
 So, the point is to help show companies that they have to treat consultants
 well... pay their people what they're owed, treat them kindly, etc.
 Otherwise these companies may find themselves unable to get people to work
 for them anymore.
 
 I don't see this being a lawsuit magnet either.  Each posting would have to
 be factual, not emotional.  No slanderous or libelous remarks.  Just facts.
 It would boil down to the consultant's word against the company.  No names
 of people would be mentioned, so you couldn't call people out by name.  You
 could go as far as to say your supervisor was a micro-manager but you
 couldn't say, my supervisor, Bill Smith, was a micro-manager and was always
 giving me a hard time.
 
 Sure, the easier way is to just post about 'em here on cf-jobs-talk, but
 then you're likely to end up with a bad rap since a lot of job posters read
 this list too, no doubt looking for anybody who might be willing to speak
 out.
 
 I haven't really decided what to call the site either.  I'm not even sure
 yet if I'll do it; I'm curious to hear what others think of the idea.
 
 Joe
 

-- 
Jeffry Houser, Technical Entrepreneur, Software Developer, Author, 
Recording Engineer
AIM: Reboog711  | Phone: 1-203-379-0773
--
My Company: http://www.dot-com-it.com
My Podcast: http://www.theflexshow.com
My Blog: http://www.jeffryhouser.com


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:3590
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.11


Re: Consultant's Revenge

2008-01-31 Thread Trevor Cole
What about the flip-side of that coin ... A site for employers to
review their contracted hire. Why not build both into the site with
the ability to tag them together and to facilitate conflict
resolution? This could be quite the lucritive venture if done
properly.




On 1/31/08, Joseph Smuzynski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 After dealing with a few too many disreputable companies, I'm just about
 ready to build a new site that is sort of a cross between
 f*ckedcompany.comand ChexSystems.

 The idea is to have a site where consultants of all types can come and
 anonymously post their negative experiences with various companies, large or
 small.  The hope is that with proper marketing, it will become the first
 place a consultant comes to check out a company before doing work for them.

 If a company ends up with a negative listing, the way they get the listing
 removed is to make good with the consultant, then the consultant can mark
 the case closed.  Naturally, if they have multiple bad entries, they would
 have to make good with everybody.

 The site would not allow inflammatory types of comments about a company;
 only facts.  Each entry would be reviewed and approved before being posted.
 There would have to be supporting data too... for example, let's say a
 company refused to pay your last invoice.  You would need to provide a copy
 of your last invoice and a work log to document it.

 All listings would have to include proof that you actually worked for the
 company... e.g. copies of pay stubs, a copy of the contract, etc.  Otherwise
 the site could be used for extortion and would lose it's advantage because
 it wouldn't be taken seriously.

 So, the point is to help show companies that they have to treat consultants
 well... pay their people what they're owed, treat them kindly, etc.
 Otherwise these companies may find themselves unable to get people to work
 for them anymore.

 I don't see this being a lawsuit magnet either.  Each posting would have to
 be factual, not emotional.  No slanderous or libelous remarks.  Just facts.
 It would boil down to the consultant's word against the company.  No names
 of people would be mentioned, so you couldn't call people out by name.  You
 could go as far as to say your supervisor was a micro-manager but you
 couldn't say, my supervisor, Bill Smith, was a micro-manager and was always
 giving me a hard time.

 Sure, the easier way is to just post about 'em here on cf-jobs-talk, but
 then you're likely to end up with a bad rap since a lot of job posters read
 this list too, no doubt looking for anybody who might be willing to speak
 out.

 I haven't really decided what to call the site either.  I'm not even sure
 yet if I'll do it; I'm curious to hear what others think of the idea.

 Joe


 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:3591
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.11


Re: Consultant's Revenge

2008-01-31 Thread Matt Williams
*cough* liability *cough*
Seeing as how it is anonymous, companies would come after the site
owner for anything they feel is untruthful (you know, the beyond the
shadow of a doubt type thing). Be careful trying to recreate a
judicial court.

On Jan 31, 2008 5:05 PM, Joseph Smuzynski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 After dealing with a few too many disreputable companies, I'm just about
 ready to build a new site that is sort of a cross between
 f*ckedcompany.comand ChexSystems.

 The idea is to have a site where consultants of all types can come and
 anonymously post their negative experiences with various companies, large or
 small.  The hope is that with proper marketing, it will become the first
 place a consultant comes to check out a company before doing work for them.

 If a company ends up with a negative listing, the way they get the listing
 removed is to make good with the consultant, then the consultant can mark
 the case closed.  Naturally, if they have multiple bad entries, they would
 have to make good with everybody.

 The site would not allow inflammatory types of comments about a company;
 only facts.  Each entry would be reviewed and approved before being posted.
 There would have to be supporting data too... for example, let's say a
 company refused to pay your last invoice.  You would need to provide a copy
 of your last invoice and a work log to document it.

 All listings would have to include proof that you actually worked for the
 company... e.g. copies of pay stubs, a copy of the contract, etc.  Otherwise
 the site could be used for extortion and would lose it's advantage because
 it wouldn't be taken seriously.

 So, the point is to help show companies that they have to treat consultants
 well... pay their people what they're owed, treat them kindly, etc.
 Otherwise these companies may find themselves unable to get people to work
 for them anymore.

 I don't see this being a lawsuit magnet either.  Each posting would have to
 be factual, not emotional.  No slanderous or libelous remarks.  Just facts.
 It would boil down to the consultant's word against the company.  No names
 of people would be mentioned, so you couldn't call people out by name.  You
 could go as far as to say your supervisor was a micro-manager but you
 couldn't say, my supervisor, Bill Smith, was a micro-manager and was always
 giving me a hard time.

 Sure, the easier way is to just post about 'em here on cf-jobs-talk, but
 then you're likely to end up with a bad rap since a lot of job posters read
 this list too, no doubt looking for anybody who might be willing to speak
 out.

 I haven't really decided what to call the site either.  I'm not even sure
 yet if I'll do it; I'm curious to hear what others think of the idea.

 Joe


 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:3589
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.11


Re: Consultant's Revenge

2008-01-31 Thread Joseph Smuzynski
Trevor:

That's an interesting idea.  I'll admit the idea crossed my mind, but I
quickly dismissed it, because of the name-mentioning necessity.  Since many
consultants are individuals, or their business name is their name, it would
end up being finger-pointing.  If we could come up with a way to make it
workable, it's a really good idea.

With regard to liability... after more thought, I wonder
if freestyle comments (even if edited) should even be allowed.  If the
poster simply chooses from one or more checkboxes to describe the situation,
it should help keep things more manageable.

Like another said, I'm surprised nobody has done this yet either.  Heck, if
there's anybody out there who likes the idea as much as I do and wants to
help, email me off-list and let's talk.

Joe


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:3593
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.11


Re: Consultant's Revenge

2008-01-31 Thread Justin Edwards
Checkbox criteria would definitely make it much better.



On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:42 PM, Joseph Smuzynski wrote:

 Trevor:

 That's an interesting idea.  I'll admit the idea crossed my mind,  
 but I
 quickly dismissed it, because of the name-mentioning necessity.   
 Since many
 consultants are individuals, or their business name is their name,  
 it would
 end up being finger-pointing.  If we could come up with a way to  
 make it
 workable, it's a really good idea.

 With regard to liability... after more thought, I wonder
 if freestyle comments (even if edited) should even be allowed.  If the
 poster simply chooses from one or more checkboxes to describe the  
 situation,
 it should help keep things more manageable.

 Like another said, I'm surprised nobody has done this yet either.   
 Heck, if
 there's anybody out there who likes the idea as much as I do and  
 wants to
 help, email me off-list and let's talk.

 Joe


 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:3594
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.11


Re: Consultant's Revenge

2008-01-31 Thread Cameron Childress
Sometimes it's best just to learn from your bad experiences and just 
move on.  Spending too much time stewing (in public) can be very 
counter-productive.

-Cameron

Joseph Smuzynski wrote:
 After dealing with a few too many disreputable companies, I'm just about
 ready to build a new site that is sort of a cross between
 f*ckedcompany.comand ChexSystems.
   

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:3592
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.11


Re: Consultant's Revenge

2008-01-31 Thread Justin Edwards
Some of the issues I have encountered in the past is temp tech jobs  
recruiting for other contractors an the other subcontractor being the  
worst link in the chain.

I started working on a project once with about 50 people and most  
contractors rapidly dropped off because of harsh treatment with the  
other company in the middle.


On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:42 PM, Joseph Smuzynski wrote:

 Trevor:

 That's an interesting idea.  I'll admit the idea crossed my mind,  
 but I
 quickly dismissed it, because of the name-mentioning necessity.   
 Since many
 consultants are individuals, or their business name is their name,  
 it would
 end up being finger-pointing.  If we could come up with a way to  
 make it
 workable, it's a really good idea.

 With regard to liability... after more thought, I wonder
 if freestyle comments (even if edited) should even be allowed.  If the
 poster simply chooses from one or more checkboxes to describe the  
 situation,
 it should help keep things more manageable.

 Like another said, I'm surprised nobody has done this yet either.   
 Heck, if
 there's anybody out there who likes the idea as much as I do and  
 wants to
 help, email me off-list and let's talk.

 Joe


 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:3595
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.11


Re: Consultant's Revenge

2008-01-31 Thread s. isaac dealey
 What about the flip-side of that coin ... A site for employers to
 review their contracted hire. Why not build both into the site with
 the ability to tag them together and to facilitate conflict
 resolution? This could be quite the lucritive venture if done
 properly.

The way I understand it, some variation of theme is already built into
rentacoder.com for example... There are a couple of problems with that,
one being that it's just for projects contracted through rentacoder and
the other being that rentacoder is like a lot of sites / software a
great example of now not to design ergonomic software that people can
actually use. 

ymmv 

-- 
s. isaac dealey  ^  new epoch
 isn't it time for a change? 
 ph: 503.236.3691

http://onTap.riaforge.org/blog



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:3596
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Jobs-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.11