Re: Hardware load balancers (lower-end)

2007-04-05 Thread Eric Haskins
Are the newer LD's 1U???  I know when I worked form my previous employer We
were switching to radware because of some issues with the LD. Not to mention
they were like 4U each :)

Eric


On 4/5/07, John Paul Ashenfelter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have to say it makes me happy to see so many people suggest Apache
> (even on Windows!) and VMWare as solutions -- both tools I've long
> been involved with.
>
> But I'm really looking for a 1u or smaller (eg VIA form-factor or
> Cisco PIX501-size) turnkey solution. I think that the used route on
> ebay for Cisco LD is where we're headed but was hoping someone's had
> experience with things like this
>
> http://www.kemptechnologies.com/load-balancer-1500.shtml
>
> or maybe some low-end serverironxl products.
>
> This gig isn't a roll-your-own ;) But thanks for the suggestions so far!
> --
> John Paul Ashenfelter
> CTO/Transitionpoint
> (blog) http://www.ashenfelter.com
> (email) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 

~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & 
Flex 2
Free Trial 
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:274584
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: Hardware load balancers (lower-end)

2007-04-05 Thread John Paul Ashenfelter
I have to say it makes me happy to see so many people suggest Apache
(even on Windows!) and VMWare as solutions -- both tools I've long
been involved with.

But I'm really looking for a 1u or smaller (eg VIA form-factor or
Cisco PIX501-size) turnkey solution. I think that the used route on
ebay for Cisco LD is where we're headed but was hoping someone's had
experience with things like this

http://www.kemptechnologies.com/load-balancer-1500.shtml

or maybe some low-end serverironxl products.

This gig isn't a roll-your-own ;) But thanks for the suggestions so far!
-- 
John Paul Ashenfelter
CTO/Transitionpoint
(blog) http://www.ashenfelter.com
(email) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

~|
Macromedia ColdFusion MX7
Upgrade to MX7 & experience time-saving features, more productivity.
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJW

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:274575
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4


RE: Hardware load balancers (lower-end)

2007-04-04 Thread Russ
Isn't that what all these boxes are?  Just some of them are not standard
PC's are using customized versions of Linux... 

It looks like it's really easy to set things up with Apache 2.2...  From
docs: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html


ProxyPass /special-area http://special.example.com/ smax=5 max=10
ProxyPass / balancer://mycluster stickysession=jsessionid nofailover=On

BalancerMember http://1.2.3.4:8009
BalancerMember http://1.2.3.5:8009 smax=10
# Less powerful server, don't send as many requests there
BalancerMember http://1.2.3.6:8009 smax=1 loadfactor=20


So looks like it support sticky sessions, and different load methods... And
the bonus is if you don't feel like setting up a linux server, you can just
install Apache on windows (you can even do it in VMWare, and my guess is
you're not even going to notice it, as it won't produce any load).  

I haven't tried it myself yet, we use a shared LB at HostMySite, but I'd be
interested to know if anyone's set this up. 

Russ

> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Haskins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 7:58 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Hardware load balancers (lower-end)
> 
> Radware!!! :)  but $$$
> 
> Russ is onto something there with LVS. All a radware is, is a PC running
> their version of linux
> 
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> On 4/4/07, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I have used both Radware WSD and Cisco Content Services Switch.
> >
> > Both worked fine for me.  Not *cheap* though.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 6:58 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Hardware load balancers (lower-end)
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I'd like to know what you're using for lower-end *hardware* load
> > balancing for your ColdFusion apps.  I've got an application to deal
> > with that doesn't have a lot of network bandwidth but does have a lot
> > of processor load, so I don't need a paired set of BIGIPs to manage it
> > :)
> >
> > I'd prefer a packaged hardware solution that supports sticky sessions
> > -- the app was not really designed for clustering. Something like an
> > old Cisco LocalDirector off ebay is probably about the right speed!
> >
> > Details: CFMX7 *Standard*, servers are Windows 2003, Web edition.
> > Using java sessions. Currently using Sonicwall and Cisco in the
> > network infrastructure.
> >
> > Thoughts/recommendations?
> >
> > --
> > John Paul Ashenfelter
> > CTO/Transitionpoint
> > (blog) http://www.ashenfelter.com
> > (email) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 

~|
Macromedia ColdFusion MX7
Upgrade to MX7 & experience time-saving features, more productivity.
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJW

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:274549
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: Hardware load balancers (lower-end)

2007-04-04 Thread Eric Haskins
Radware!!! :)  but $$$

Russ is onto something there with LVS. All a radware is, is a PC running
their version of linux


Eric


On 4/4/07, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have used both Radware WSD and Cisco Content Services Switch.
>
> Both worked fine for me.  Not *cheap* though.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 6:58 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Hardware load balancers (lower-end)
>
> Folks,
>
> I'd like to know what you're using for lower-end *hardware* load
> balancing for your ColdFusion apps.  I've got an application to deal
> with that doesn't have a lot of network bandwidth but does have a lot
> of processor load, so I don't need a paired set of BIGIPs to manage it
> :)
>
> I'd prefer a packaged hardware solution that supports sticky sessions
> -- the app was not really designed for clustering. Something like an
> old Cisco LocalDirector off ebay is probably about the right speed!
>
> Details: CFMX7 *Standard*, servers are Windows 2003, Web edition.
> Using java sessions. Currently using Sonicwall and Cisco in the
> network infrastructure.
>
> Thoughts/recommendations?
>
> --
> John Paul Ashenfelter
> CTO/Transitionpoint
> (blog) http://www.ashenfelter.com
> (email) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> 

~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features.
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJR

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:274545
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


RE: Hardware load balancers (lower-end)

2007-04-04 Thread Jacob
I have used both Radware WSD and Cisco Content Services Switch.

Both worked fine for me.  Not *cheap* though.

-Original Message-
From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 6:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Hardware load balancers (lower-end)

Folks,

I'd like to know what you're using for lower-end *hardware* load
balancing for your ColdFusion apps.  I've got an application to deal
with that doesn't have a lot of network bandwidth but does have a lot
of processor load, so I don't need a paired set of BIGIPs to manage it
:)

I'd prefer a packaged hardware solution that supports sticky sessions
-- the app was not really designed for clustering. Something like an
old Cisco LocalDirector off ebay is probably about the right speed!

Details: CFMX7 *Standard*, servers are Windows 2003, Web edition.
Using java sessions. Currently using Sonicwall and Cisco in the
network infrastructure.

Thoughts/recommendations?

-- 
John Paul Ashenfelter
CTO/Transitionpoint
(blog) http://www.ashenfelter.com
(email) [EMAIL PROTECTED]



~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & 
Flex 2
Free Trial 
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:274542
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


RE: Hardware load balancers (lower-end)

2007-04-04 Thread Dave Watts
> I'd prefer a packaged hardware solution that supports sticky sessions
> -- the app was not really designed for clustering. Something 
> like an old Cisco LocalDirector off ebay is probably about 
> the right speed!

eBay and uBid are your friends here. I've had better success with uBid for
computer hardware, myself. Some of the used Radware hardware solutions can
be picked up pretty cheap.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/

Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta,
Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location.
Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information!

This email has been processed by SmoothZap - www.smoothwall.net


~|
Macromedia ColdFusion MX7
Upgrade to MX7 & experience time-saving features, more productivity.
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJW

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:274536
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4


RE: Hardware load balancers (lower-end)

2007-04-04 Thread Russ
I know you said hardware, but if you're not going to implement redundancy 
anyway, you might just want to use a software solution like Apache's 
mod_proxy_balancer or LVS.  Can install it on top of Free VMWare Server, using 
CentOS and have a total cost of $0 (plus time required to implement.  

With LVS I believe you can even set up clusters, so should the primary machine 
hosting LVS go down, another one can pick up.  

Russ

> -Original Message-
> From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 9:58 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Hardware load balancers (lower-end)
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I'd like to know what you're using for lower-end *hardware* load
> balancing for your ColdFusion apps.  I've got an application to deal
> with that doesn't have a lot of network bandwidth but does have a lot
> of processor load, so I don't need a paired set of BIGIPs to manage it
> :)
> 
> I'd prefer a packaged hardware solution that supports sticky sessions
> -- the app was not really designed for clustering. Something like an
> old Cisco LocalDirector off ebay is probably about the right speed!
> 
> Details: CFMX7 *Standard*, servers are Windows 2003, Web edition.
> Using java sessions. Currently using Sonicwall and Cisco in the
> network infrastructure.
> 
> Thoughts/recommendations?
> 
> --
> John Paul Ashenfelter
> CTO/Transitionpoint
> (blog) http://www.ashenfelter.com
> (email) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJP

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:274533
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: Hardware load balancers (lower-end)

2007-04-04 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
Seems like you answered your own post :-) 





"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note
that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call
our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." 
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com

-Original Message-
From: John Paul Ashenfelter
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wed Apr 04 14:57:34 2007
Subject: Hardware load balancers (lower-end)

Folks,

I'd like to know what you're using for lower-end *hardware* load
balancing for your ColdFusion apps.  I've got an application to deal
with that doesn't have a lot of network bandwidth but does have a lot
of processor load, so I don't need a paired set of BIGIPs to manage it
:)

I'd prefer a packaged hardware solution that supports sticky sessions
-- the app was not really designed for clustering. Something like an
old Cisco LocalDirector off ebay is probably about the right speed!

Details: CFMX7 *Standard*, servers are Windows 2003, Web edition.
Using java sessions. Currently using Sonicwall and Cisco in the
network infrastructure.

Thoughts/recommendations?

-- 
John Paul Ashenfelter
CTO/Transitionpoint
(blog) http://www.ashenfelter.com
(email) [EMAIL PROTECTED]



~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & 
Flex 2
Free Trial 
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:274522
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4


Hardware load balancers (lower-end)

2007-04-04 Thread John Paul Ashenfelter
Folks,

I'd like to know what you're using for lower-end *hardware* load
balancing for your ColdFusion apps.  I've got an application to deal
with that doesn't have a lot of network bandwidth but does have a lot
of processor load, so I don't need a paired set of BIGIPs to manage it
:)

I'd prefer a packaged hardware solution that supports sticky sessions
-- the app was not really designed for clustering. Something like an
old Cisco LocalDirector off ebay is probably about the right speed!

Details: CFMX7 *Standard*, servers are Windows 2003, Web edition.
Using java sessions. Currently using Sonicwall and Cisco in the
network infrastructure.

Thoughts/recommendations?

-- 
John Paul Ashenfelter
CTO/Transitionpoint
(blog) http://www.ashenfelter.com
(email) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

~|
ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2 
Build sales & marketing dashboard RIA’s for your business. Upgrade now
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2?sdid=RVJT

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:274506
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4