Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
Picky picky... The point was that IIS doesn't process the file - CF does. - Original Message - From: "Mike Sheldon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 5:53 PM Subject: RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? > Actually, IIS does NOT "shove the .cfm file to the CF parser sight unseen" > > IIS never touches .cfm files unless it's mis-configured, or has been told to > check for the file's existence before handing the request off. (Even then it > does not actually open the file, it just looks for it.). Why do you think CF > has its own 404 error pages? > > When IIS gets a request for a file ending in .cfm, it passes the *request* > to CF. CF opens the file all by it's lonesome. You can prove this by running > CF under a user account and giving CF permission tot he files, but not IIS. > (or the other way around if you like errors) > > Michael J. Sheldon > Internet Applications Developer > Phone: 480.699.1084 > http://www.desertraven.com/ > PGP Key Available on Request > > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Beer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 14:22 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? > > > It's not CF that doesn't support on the-fly-decrypting, it's the web server. > IIS just shoves the .cfm file to the CF parser sight unseen. Of course CF > chokes on the encrypted file - it look like garbage to the CF server. Same > with ASP, Perl, Tango, what have you. > > MS would need to build support for on-the-fly decryption into IIS. I hope > they don't, as it would incur far too much overhead. What seems to be > transparent to you when using MSWord or something becomes a huge issue when > multiplied by thousands of page hits. > > The real issue here is why would you want to use that form of encryption > anyway? With the proper permissions set on NT, your code is safe. > > - Original Message - > From: "Mike Amburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Cf-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:46 PM > Subject: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? > > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > > > --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="iso-8859-1" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to > > support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: > > > > The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, > > or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted > > > > as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. > > > > anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a > service > > patch? > > > > Mike Amburn > > Application Development > > > > --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 > > Content-Type: image/gif; > > name="atworklogo_very_small.gif" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > > Content-ID: <994194320@29032000-1c68> > > > > > R0lGODlhhwAsAPcAAMDAwHNzc4SEhKWlpa2trdbW1ufn5+/v77Wtpf/nvffWnP/vzv/nte/WpXtr > > > Sv/WhPfv3vfWjO/OhPfGWvfGUvfOa++9OffWc+fGY+/GUue9Svfv1v/nnP/nlN7Gc97Ga+/GKffG > > > GOe1CPfGCP/GAJSMa+fWjFpSMf/WMee9GOe9APfGAN7Wrf/nc97GUv/eQufGKf/3xv/nUu/WSt7G > > > Of/ve9bGSu/npefWQt7OOf/3nP/3jP/3e//3Y6WlnM7Ovf//zv//xu/vra2te///td7elPf/vd7n > > > pdbn1qW9tWN7c87W1rW9vUpSUnuMjDFCQuf3/6W1vYyltb3Gzpylrd7v/4SMlGNrc0pSWtbe55Sc > > > pVJaY9bn/zFCWhAhOb3O56W1zmNzjL3G1pyltXuElFpjczlCUsbO3qWtvYSMnJytzjlKaxAhQhgx > > > YwgYOdbe787W57W9zq21xoyUpXN7jGtzhHOErWNznBApawgYQgghY73G3nuEnFpje5Sl1jlKezFC > > > cxgpWhAhUsbO56WtxpSctYyUrWNrhFJac0pSa2t7rWNzpSkxSkpajFJjnCk5axAhWggYSgAQQpyl > > > xoyc1oSUzjlCYzFChBghQhgpawAQStbe/7W93q211r3G73N7nGNrjFJae1pjjHOEzjE5WikxUiEp > > > Sik5exAYORAhawgYWoyUvWtznEpSe0JKcyExexAYQhgpewgQOcbO/62156Wt3pSczoSMvXuEtWNr > > > nDlCezE5ayEpWhghUrW994yUzoSMxkpSjCkxayEpYxAYUkJKjCkxcykxhCEpcyEpexAYWhAYYwgQ > > > Wufn787O1rW1vaWlrZycpdbW597e78bG1r29zpycrdbW72tre97e/4yMpb293lJSY7W13sbG94SE > > > pb2973t7nGtrjISEtSEhMTExSmNjpSEhQjExYzExawgIIca9xmtja/fn7wAA > > > ACH5BAEALACHACwA > > > QAj/AAEIHEiwoMGDCBMqXMiwocOHECNKLHigWho02yYqvDaslxaNIEO+OWXMi6kkY9oYCwSoChSC > > > tgJlWjamILheMxFVEWin1zA8vCC1eZRFYCGhmA4BsMPMmKBHhgYRLBBtDaY2gsIIFCCo
RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
> Actually, IIS does NOT "shove the .cfm file to the CF parser > sight unseen" > > IIS never touches .cfm files unless it's mis-configured, or > has been told to check for the file's existence before handing > the request off. (Even then it does not actually open the file, > it just looks for it.). Why do you think CF has its own 404 error > pages? > > When IIS gets a request for a file ending in .cfm, it passes > the *request* to CF. CF opens the file all by it's lonesome. You > can prove this by running CF under a user account and giving CF > permission tot he files, but not IIS. (or the other way around > if you like errors) This doesn't seem to be exactly correct. IIS does check file ACLs - it has to. It performs an impersonation using either the anonymous user account, or using the authenticated user account when Basic Authentication or NTLM Authentication are required. If the CF service has read/execute rights to a file, but the IIS impersonation user account doesn't, IIS will return a 401 error message - access denied. I tested this by creating a user account, running CF with that user account, removing permissions from a specific file except for that user account, then attempting to access the file using anonymous access first, then Basic Authentication. Of course, you could make the argument that reading a file's ACL isn't quite the same thing as reading the file itself. I'm not sure how this plays out when you request a nonexistent CF script; CF obviously returns the fake 404 error message. I don't know what the order of events is for this. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer
> So here is a question: > CF is running under a service account - that has permissions > across the network. > > If the file in Question is encrypted under the Admin account > - won't the system have access to it then??? No, it won't. The Local System security context isn't a user account, per se. You'd have to run the service as the specific user who encrypted the file in the first place. Also, the Local System security context has no network rights. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
> It's not CF that doesn't support on the-fly-decrypting, it's > the web server. IIS just shoves the .cfm file to the CF parser > sight unseen. Of course CF chokes on the encrypted file - it > look like garbage to the CF server. Same with ASP, Perl, > Tango, what have you. > > MS would need to build support for on-the-fly decryption into > IIS. I hope they don't, as it would incur far too much overhead. > What seems to be transparent to you when using MSWord or something > becomes a huge issue when multiplied by thousands of page hits. That's not exactly how Win2K's EFS works. It's built into NTFS, essentially, so that if you're the user who encrypted the file in the first place, when you request the file, it will automatically be decrypted for you. This applies whether you're an interactive user, or a user account used by a service. To use EFS with a service, you simply have to run the service as a specific user, instead of the local system context. For services that provide impersonation, like IIS, the user of the service will have to be the one who encrypted the file in the first place. > The real issue here is why would you want to use that form of > encryption anyway? With the proper permissions set on NT, your > code is safe. That's right. EFS is not intended for use in this context. It's designed mostly for mobile users, who might have critical files on their laptop. Without EFS, once your laptop is stolen, the bad guy could install another copy of NT or Win2K on it, then use administrative rights to take control of the files. With EFS, the bad guy would either need to know the original user's account and password, or the specific admin account reserved for data retrieval, which in a Win2K domain environment would be a domain account. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
Actually, IIS does NOT "shove the .cfm file to the CF parser sight unseen" IIS never touches .cfm files unless it's mis-configured, or has been told to check for the file's existence before handing the request off. (Even then it does not actually open the file, it just looks for it.). Why do you think CF has its own 404 error pages? When IIS gets a request for a file ending in .cfm, it passes the *request* to CF. CF opens the file all by it's lonesome. You can prove this by running CF under a user account and giving CF permission tot he files, but not IIS. (or the other way around if you like errors) Michael J. Sheldon Internet Applications Developer Phone: 480.699.1084 http://www.desertraven.com/ PGP Key Available on Request -Original Message- From: Jeff Beer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 14:22 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? It's not CF that doesn't support on the-fly-decrypting, it's the web server. IIS just shoves the .cfm file to the CF parser sight unseen. Of course CF chokes on the encrypted file - it look like garbage to the CF server. Same with ASP, Perl, Tango, what have you. MS would need to build support for on-the-fly decryption into IIS. I hope they don't, as it would incur far too much overhead. What seems to be transparent to you when using MSWord or something becomes a huge issue when multiplied by thousands of page hits. The real issue here is why would you want to use that form of encryption anyway? With the proper permissions set on NT, your code is safe. - Original Message - From: "Mike Amburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Cf-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:46 PM Subject: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to > support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: > > The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, > or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted > > as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. > > anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a service > patch? > > Mike Amburn > Application Development > > --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 > Content-Type: image/gif; > name="atworklogo_very_small.gif" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > Content-ID: <994194320@29032000-1c68> > > R0lGODlhhwAsAPcAAMDAwHNzc4SEhKWlpa2trdbW1ufn5+/v77Wtpf/nvffWnP/vzv/nte/WpXtr > Sv/WhPfv3vfWjO/OhPfGWvfGUvfOa++9OffWc+fGY+/GUue9Svfv1v/nnP/nlN7Gc97Ga+/GKffG > GOe1CPfGCP/GAJSMa+fWjFpSMf/WMee9GOe9APfGAN7Wrf/nc97GUv/eQufGKf/3xv/nUu/WSt7G > Of/ve9bGSu/npefWQt7OOf/3nP/3jP/3e//3Y6WlnM7Ovf//zv//xu/vra2te///td7elPf/vd7n > pdbn1qW9tWN7c87W1rW9vUpSUnuMjDFCQuf3/6W1vYyltb3Gzpylrd7v/4SMlGNrc0pSWtbe55Sc > pVJaY9bn/zFCWhAhOb3O56W1zmNzjL3G1pyltXuElFpjczlCUsbO3qWtvYSMnJytzjlKaxAhQhgx > YwgYOdbe787W57W9zq21xoyUpXN7jGtzhHOErWNznBApawgYQgghY73G3nuEnFpje5Sl1jlKezFC > cxgpWhAhUsbO56WtxpSctYyUrWNrhFJac0pSa2t7rWNzpSkxSkpajFJjnCk5axAhWggYSgAQQpyl > xoyc1oSUzjlCYzFChBghQhgpawAQStbe/7W93q211r3G73N7nGNrjFJae1pjjHOEzjE5WikxUiEp > Sik5exAYORAhawgYWoyUvWtznEpSe0JKcyExexAYQhgpewgQOcbO/62156Wt3pSczoSMvXuEtWNr > nDlCezE5ayEpWhghUrW994yUzoSMxkpSjCkxayEpYxAYUkJKjCkxcykxhCEpcyEpexAYWhAYYwgQ > Wufn787O1rW1vaWlrZycpdbW597e78bG1r29zpycrdbW72tre97e/4yMpb293lJSY7W13sbG94SE > pb2973t7nGtrjISEtSEhMTExSmNjpSEhQjExYzExawgIIca9xmtja/fn7wAA > ACH5BAEALACHACwA > QAj/AAEIHEiwoMGDCBMqXMiwocOHECNKLHigWho02yYqvDaslxaNIEO+OWXMi6kkY9oYCwSoChSC > tgJlWjamILheMxFVEWin1zA8vCC1eZRFYCGhmA4BsMPMmKBHhgYRLBBtDaY2gsIIFCCoVxdpBBcJ > aiPMG4BBXjJl+ghACjNkqAq1C6nQTiRjy0qFqtMnVJ8+ZUKRSnXMFCiBtQQtw0MF4RxNxpAdcxOK > oBQ3bTLFitUl20Bs6kixa0KIS0FPgIY9yhPmJRlVeLpsAhBOVi9BtQiCK5UJjyGBZCQN4+WHLsgD > KlbAsMDBiEQgQHRwaFEhQwYDCw1MmXaGyZmEU5ox/0TyA3vCAg7FxDHOvr17hQecERiw7oBCJAbm > vt/fEMqeOdgkws0VZFAhxxnTAGAfANPAEccY34SCSiTDGAMMfxgWxIkuyhijVhtRDATFGLZMMskq > haA4iRSTVHEIMcMo00hB2xgjDB6CLFKQL714aEYnBNGyiiKiNJKLId14BgAddAg0hSGrmGgiIZ1I > VRCUwCxRUCeTkCEFEhk2EskpmdgBABRo5oJMMpAUI9AGEBRiSiCBWGPQNFYJ84gvjQTSCyOmkQEJ > HplQMsoy6ESCBgCtmJLJMGYpROYwbqYB2zC5gGLOH2xEEskTjQEADjqQBNLIbYEokqFAaDSBSCiJ > fP93kAw4lHBCGYlsoZ5ffYSIkBh9JIIIWwRdww43JzjQwA0sCAGBiGKE04clpZRiSR/hUGPQAK0g > UkeCAlFzSCgDOgPAGX2IEsozBYkjTiJ1oLeqQjeYYAMNKeSrb74wwIDBBxKYkMACxp3BjkB0aHGG > AHMkAsAS0kBjJzdvpGHIG30MEs41AByyxzdgfMMHA
Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
It's not CF that doesn't support on the-fly-decrypting, it's the web server. IIS just shoves the .cfm file to the CF parser sight unseen. Of course CF chokes on the encrypted file - it look like garbage to the CF server. Same with ASP, Perl, Tango, what have you. MS would need to build support for on-the-fly decryption into IIS. I hope they don't, as it would incur far too much overhead. What seems to be transparent to you when using MSWord or something becomes a huge issue when multiplied by thousands of page hits. The real issue here is why would you want to use that form of encryption anyway? With the proper permissions set on NT, your code is safe. - Original Message - From: "Mike Amburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Cf-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:46 PM Subject: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to > support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: > > The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, > or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted > > as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. > > anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a service > patch? > > Mike Amburn > Application Development > > --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 > Content-Type: image/gif; > name="atworklogo_very_small.gif" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > Content-ID: <994194320@29032000-1c68> > > R0lGODlhhwAsAPcAAMDAwHNzc4SEhKWlpa2trdbW1ufn5+/v77Wtpf/nvffWnP/vzv/nte/WpXtr > Sv/WhPfv3vfWjO/OhPfGWvfGUvfOa++9OffWc+fGY+/GUue9Svfv1v/nnP/nlN7Gc97Ga+/GKffG > GOe1CPfGCP/GAJSMa+fWjFpSMf/WMee9GOe9APfGAN7Wrf/nc97GUv/eQufGKf/3xv/nUu/WSt7G > Of/ve9bGSu/npefWQt7OOf/3nP/3jP/3e//3Y6WlnM7Ovf//zv//xu/vra2te///td7elPf/vd7n > pdbn1qW9tWN7c87W1rW9vUpSUnuMjDFCQuf3/6W1vYyltb3Gzpylrd7v/4SMlGNrc0pSWtbe55Sc > pVJaY9bn/zFCWhAhOb3O56W1zmNzjL3G1pyltXuElFpjczlCUsbO3qWtvYSMnJytzjlKaxAhQhgx > YwgYOdbe787W57W9zq21xoyUpXN7jGtzhHOErWNznBApawgYQgghY73G3nuEnFpje5Sl1jlKezFC > cxgpWhAhUsbO56WtxpSctYyUrWNrhFJac0pSa2t7rWNzpSkxSkpajFJjnCk5axAhWggYSgAQQpyl > xoyc1oSUzjlCYzFChBghQhgpawAQStbe/7W93q211r3G73N7nGNrjFJae1pjjHOEzjE5WikxUiEp > Sik5exAYORAhawgYWoyUvWtznEpSe0JKcyExexAYQhgpewgQOcbO/62156Wt3pSczoSMvXuEtWNr > nDlCezE5ayEpWhghUrW994yUzoSMxkpSjCkxayEpYxAYUkJKjCkxcykxhCEpcyEpexAYWhAYYwgQ > Wufn787O1rW1vaWlrZycpdbW597e78bG1r29zpycrdbW72tre97e/4yMpb293lJSY7W13sbG94SE > pb2973t7nGtrjISEtSEhMTExSmNjpSEhQjExYzExawgIIca9xmtja/fn7wAA > ACH5BAEALACHACwA > QAj/AAEIHEiwoMGDCBMqXMiwocOHECNKLHigWho02yYqvDaslxaNIEO+OWXMi6kkY9oYCwSoChSC > tgJlWjamILheMxFVEWin1zA8vCC1eZRFYCGhmA4BsMPMmKBHhgYRLBBtDaY2gsIIFCCoVxdpBBcJ > aiPMG4BBXjJl+ghACjNkqAq1C6nQTiRjy0qFqtMnVJ8+ZUKRSnXMFCiBtQQtw0MF4RxNxpAdcxOK > oBQ3bTLFitUl20Bs6kixa0KIS0FPgIY9yhPmJRlVeLpsAhBOVi9BtQiCK5UJjyGBZCQN4+WHLsgD > KlbAsMDBiEQgQHRwaFEhQwYDCw1MmXaGyZmEU5ox/0TyA3vCAg7FxDHOvr17hQecERiw7oBCJAbm > vt/fEMqeOdgkws0VZFAhxxnTAGAfANPAEccY34SCSiTDGAMMfxgWxIkuyhijVhtRDATFGLZMMskq > haA4iRSTVHEIMcMo00hB2xgjDB6CLFKQL714aEYnBNGyiiKiNJKLId14BgAddAg0hSGrmGgiIZ1I > VRCUwCxRUCeTkCEFEhk2EskpmdgBABRo5oJMMpAUI9AGEBRiSiCBWGPQNFYJ84gvjQTSCyOmkQEJ > HplQMsoy6ESCBgCtmJLJMGYpROYwbqYB2zC5gGLOH2xEEskTjQEADjqQBNLIbYEokqFAaDSBSCiJ > fP93kAw4lHBCGYlsoZ5ffYSIkBh9JIIIWwRdww43JzjQwA0sCAGBiGKE04clpZRiSR/hUGPQAK0g > UkeCAlFzSCgDOgPAGX2IEsozBYkjTiJ1oLeqQjeYYAMNKeSrb74wwIDBBxKYkMACxp3BjkB0aHGG > AHMkAsAS0kBjJzdvpGHIG30MEs41AByyxzdgfMMHAIawAkYhnXxzDSgrg7FNOIWA8gkYVzbZhxiD > pEHNFlnENy+GVVwDhjZ1FFOMLrukk84aruQyTiez/Sz1qllQQ4c4VshBkH4ONbMKOrwQ48TU+3VS > LSm8dKOgQ4ScA/Yu4EhTzRTyAjMMG4Ac9E0v6Jz/c4h5DE1jRhlku/eFJcS0gcxMeDBipSfo9NJL > OjDyogwvkaDzxhvFQKJWqABcww2MeuBhii0DNROKKcMQ881ZhxgjSRuQQKKKIIG00QYzyezyy0Bp > KNPGMMLY2EsebuRhiRoCcYIJMszUJFAnfUSShyucrFpFIjGasgpPdymzhmkDrWIK7dIT9A2dptwC > gDe89GKKHbWUEoseSmVjSS+88DJLJcoYRiCU8BKE8AESwpDEHQBghWW0oRSzIAguehGJUuzhLOcj > BiGqIIo8EAMQb5gXF/qwjEw8QhilYEOnMMELZOAhFqmogzTgZIte0M5OBunE+TLxCmTcZg4CMcAf > /2TSQ2RgojVLyUNmmpSQOQwvEouAwmsy8QdbhAIWqpkE+QQyi1K0AQ+d8AYgTCGJRoQwQ2noHy+C > gRAgDIEUpohck2rBCwGCziCLgIUwlGGJLxCEC4K6hIcQAAAjCIEIQmBCAEqhDqEEYhiQzEQbiBGI > UBBiIE5QBSTQwTEATAITiQpFJ3cjyUUJpBvoyIQyENHJwgEAAiRQgQeI8B4dSCcCDWCAK3cJEQpo > QAQiGEEIZNADDuggCMhMpg52UIMayGAGOaCBDVxgggY8yyEFcAY1yDCNZzTjDUsAFzW0lAQ6hPNc > 0hjEGc8gKzrYaRrUANcZqGGIM0jvDHB4yTSuIf+rgVihDgDYAz8LmIV1TKUovNTIMxKRoCloAyxn > sMIYziCNOdhJolZQGB2ogYY4TMEaBbACGphAhTOkwUF1sKjVqiGHek4DDWg4gzWYAI2BEE0adYip > Fpwxh2fQbQwGTahQh0rU9kwjC0jAD+CKylSQVGMM4rCEKchxjnNAUhjCABsmYDEhUoRCa00N60GW > YIhgHcIQ1ChgQzbxCWNgLh1iEGtTpfGMOQhgG0qiCyvCNja5OoQa1agGuyKChj10Iq4CWQcB5CCN > bHhiDxc0SAGqcYbAQiRyU/BrQ8KBClNEAhOigMg1ygGLXmBiHAYJBSbyMAywDiQb6IAkKl7HEPv/ > oCERQNLsQr6RuZUYQxkBGMggGIGKCWGCFKXABCpkwYg3EGJ4KjmjQKz
RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer
The system account does NOT have permissions accross the network. In fact, the system account is pretty restricted in what it can do for security reasons. The system account cannot access ANY user's accounts. Michael J. Sheldon Internet Applications Developer Phone: 480.699.1084 http://www.desertraven.com/ PGP Key Available on Request -Original Message- From: Pecora, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 12:48 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer So here is a question: CF is running under a service account - that has permissions across teh network. If the file in Question is encrypted under the Admin account - won't the system have access to it then??? -Original Message- From: Eddie Shipman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 8:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer But you can cause your service to run under a spceific security context. Basically, all services run using a service account unless you specify that you want them to run under a different one. Check with your NT Administrator on that one...You should be able to have the CF service "impersonate" another user to read those files. > >> Just a guess here as I haven't tried EFS on a server yet, but I >> would think >> that since files are encrypted by and can only be read by >the file owner >> (as I understand it) that the CF Server service would need to run >> under the >> context of the file owner - ie have the CF service login as >that user. > >thank you, someone that actually has constructive input to offer... > >you are correct. after i RTF-Win2000-M, i found the following: > ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body. -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body. -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer
It should but are you logged in as administrator? The services use the System account. I don't know how to impersonate that account using a login... >So here is a question: >CF is running under a service account - that has permissions across teh >network. > >If the file in Question is encrypted under the Admin account - >won't the >system have access to it then??? > >From: Eddie Shipman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >But you can cause your service to run under a spceific security >context. Basically, all services run using a service account unless >you specify that you want them to run under a different one. > >Check with your NT Administrator on that one...You should be able to >have the CF service "impersonate" another user to read those files. >> >>> Just a guess here as I haven't tried EFS on a server yet, but I >>> would think >>> that since files are encrypted by and can only be read by >>the file owner >>> (as I understand it) that the CF Server service would need to run >>> under the >>> context of the file owner - ie have the CF service login as >>that user. >> >>thank you, someone that actually has constructive input to offer... >> >>you are correct. after i RTF-Win2000-M, i found the following: >> > ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer
So here is a question: CF is running under a service account - that has permissions across teh network. If the file in Question is encrypted under the Admin account - won't the system have access to it then??? -Original Message- From: Eddie Shipman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 8:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer But you can cause your service to run under a spceific security context. Basically, all services run using a service account unless you specify that you want them to run under a different one. Check with your NT Administrator on that one...You should be able to have the CF service "impersonate" another user to read those files. > >> Just a guess here as I haven't tried EFS on a server yet, but I >> would think >> that since files are encrypted by and can only be read by >the file owner >> (as I understand it) that the CF Server service would need to run >> under the >> context of the file owner - ie have the CF service login as >that user. > >thank you, someone that actually has constructive input to offer... > >you are correct. after i RTF-Win2000-M, i found the following: > ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body. -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer
But you can cause your service to run under a spceific security context. Basically, all services run using a service account unless you specify that you want them to run under a different one. Check with your NT Administrator on that one...You should be able to have the CF service "impersonate" another user to read those files. > >> Just a guess here as I haven't tried EFS on a server yet, but I >> would think >> that since files are encrypted by and can only be read by >the file owner >> (as I understand it) that the CF Server service would need to run >> under the >> context of the file owner - ie have the CF service login as >that user. > >thank you, someone that actually has constructive input to offer... > >you are correct. after i RTF-Win2000-M, i found the following: > ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? WTF!?!?
> first off, i have cf-talk set to send "plain text only", so if any > attachments are being sent, that's news to me. granted i'll figure out why > outlook is still sending them, but no need to give a speech like i haven't > been reading this list forever and a day. Wow. That's a pretty rude response. I give you a simple heads-up about the fact that your email programming is embedding two graphic images and you need to slam me for it. Take a pill or something, man. > i posted to get answers, to see if anyone else has run into this. isn't that > the point of a discussion group, to help each other out? i'm quite > disappointed that the first replies i get are "that's microsoft's problem, > not ours" and "well, don't do that again". Mike, you're definitely overreacting. I made an attempt to answer your question. I may be wrong but I tried to lend some insight as to why you may be having the problem. In addition, in your first post, you didn't put anywhere near the amount of detail that you just did on your response to me. My apologies for trying to help. Rey... -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
Any scripting language has to read a file containing the code to run. It doesn't matter if its CF, Perl, Rebol or even Asp. If the file is encrypted, then the script engine can not read the file nor can it run the script. I'm assuming that MS has something built into asp to automatically decode the file for use, but no other script engine has that ability. They can not unless MS gives out the encryption code and they integrate it into the engine. As Rey said, this would render the whole thing useless. Using this logic, I can say that every scripting language will be effected by this. - Original Message - From: "William James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On the other hand, who says that they all have problems with it? Maybe only > Cold Fusion does. Unless someone's tried them all, I don't think you can say > one way or the other who's problem it is, but I do think that Allaire is the > ones who would need to fix it. As well as each of the others. You don't have > to use the MS Encryption (I don't see why you would need to), but if you do, > you have to use products that work with it. It is not up to MS to make sure > their technology works with other programming languages unless they said the > encryption process is for use with them. That's like saying MS has to make > drivers for Windows 2000 for all of your hardware. They don't. The hardware > manufacturer should make the drivers for windows 2000 if they want their > hardware to work in Windows2000. MS has done an awesome job of making sure > most stuff works, but I've read too many hardware sites that say, "MS has a > pretty good driver for our hardware and although it could be better, we > aren't going to bother making a new one". > - Original Message - > From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 1:33 PM > Subject: Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? > > > > Forgive me for asking, but if MS gives a new 'feature' that will effect > CF, > > Perl, Rebol and almost every non-MS scripting language, why would you > think > > it needs a fix from Allaire? > > > > > > Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to > > > support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: > > > > > > The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for > reading, > > > or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted > > > > > > as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. > > > > > > anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a > > service > > > patch? > > > > > > -- > > > Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk > > To Unsubscribe visit > http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or > send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in > the body. > > > > -- > Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk > To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body. > -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer
> Just a guess here as I haven't tried EFS on a server yet, but I > would think > that since files are encrypted by and can only be read by the file owner > (as I understand it) that the CF Server service would need to run > under the > context of the file owner - ie have the CF service login as that user. thank you, someone that actually has constructive input to offer... you are correct. after i RTF-Win2000-M, i found the following: -- Accessing encrypted data Users access encrypted files just as they do unencrypted files. Thus, when a user accesses an encrypted file that is stored on disk, the user is able to read the contents of the file in the normal way. When the user stores the file on disk again, EFS transparently encrypts the file again. Only the user that encrypted a file can access it later. This is assured because users have private keys that allow them access to their own encrypted files. If another user tries to access an encrypted file, that user receives an Access Denied message. -- so i am assuming that anything that runs as a service or using a system account (IIS, CF, SQL Server, backup server) will not be able to read a file that is encrypted by me using the Win2000 file encryption. that's an important feature, i'd say. mike -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? WTF!?!?
first off, i have cf-talk set to send "plain text only", so if any attachments are being sent, that's news to me. granted i'll figure out why outlook is still sending them, but no need to give a speech like i haven't been reading this list forever and a day. second... i can encrypt a file and have no problem opening it in - Microsoft Word - Netscape Navigator - ColdFusion Studio that's because the encryption is being handled by the OS/file system. i assume it's decrypted before streaming to the application and then re-encrypted with each save. So no encrypting algorithm is needed by third party vendors if the OS is handling it, as it is. now, the only problem i have is when i attempt to access it through a web server. this applies to *.cfm (and as i've learned in the last hour) *.html and *.asp. apparently the functions that decrypt the file for desktop applications is not being run by the web server (IIS5 in my case). whether this is a securiy feature of IIS5, a security feature for any web server running on Win2000, or a bug i have no idea. i posted to get answers, to see if anyone else has run into this. isn't that the point of a discussion group, to help each other out? i'm quite disappointed that the first replies i get are "that's microsoft's problem, not ours" and "well, don't do that again". geez, guys... what's up with that? i've seen too many great discussions and ideas come out of this list than to get replies like that... mike > -Original Message- > From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 4:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? > > > Mike, > > I wouldn't expect it to be dealt with. That's a feature of Win2K to help > protect your files in an internal, corporate environment. MS would have to > allow 3rd party vendors access to their unecryption algorithms in order to > do this. This would essentially negate any security that encryption might > offer you. > > As a side note, the admins of CF-Talk list have disabled file attachment > capabilities because of a virus scare so any messages w/ attached > files are > coming out screwy. Would you mind removing your > atworklogo_very_small.gif & > Glacier Bkgrd.jpg files from your messages. > > Thanks, > > Rey... > Certified Allaire Instructor > Member of Team Allaire > > "A browser's beauty, at its heart, is its usefulness as a *TOOL*." > > > - Original Message - > From: "Mike Amburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Cf-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:46 PM > Subject: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? > > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > > > --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="iso-8859-1" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to > > support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: > > > > The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened > for reading, > > or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted > > > > as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. > > > > anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a > service > > patch? > > > > Mike Amburn > > Application Development -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
Mike - Just a guess here as I haven't tried EFS on a server yet, but I would think that since files are encrypted by and can only be read by the file owner (as I understand it) that the CF Server service would need to run under the context of the file owner - ie have the CF service login as that user. Jay At 04:27 PM 3/29/2000 -0500, you wrote: >Mike, > >I wouldn't expect it to be dealt with. That's a feature of Win2K to help >protect your files in an internal, corporate environment. MS would have to >allow 3rd party vendors access to their unecryption algorithms in order to >do this. This would essentially negate any security that encryption might >offer you. > >As a side note, the admins of CF-Talk list have disabled file attachment >capabilities because of a virus scare so any messages w/ attached files are >coming out screwy. Would you mind removing your atworklogo_very_small.gif & >Glacier Bkgrd.jpg files from your messages. > >Thanks, > >Rey... >Certified Allaire Instructor >Member of Team Allaire > >"A browser's beauty, at its heart, is its usefulness as a *TOOL*." > > >- Original Message - >From: "Mike Amburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Cf-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:46 PM >Subject: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? > > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > > > --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="iso-8859-1" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to > > support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: > > > > The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, > > or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted > > > > as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. > > > > anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a >service > > patch? > > > > Mike Amburn > > Application Development > > > > --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 > > Content-Type: image/gif; [Ugly GIF garbage removed...] -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
At 02:10 PM 3/29/00 -0800, you wrote: >On the other hand, who says that they all have problems with it? Maybe only >Cold Fusion does. Unless someone's tried them all, I don't think you can say >one way or the other who's problem it is, but I do think that Allaire is the >ones who would need to fix it. As well as each of the others. You don't have >to use the MS Encryption (I don't see why you would need to), but if you do, >you have to use products that work with it. It is not up to MS to make sure >their technology works with other programming languages unless they said the >encryption process is for use with them. That's like saying MS has to make >drivers for Windows 2000 for all of your hardware. They don't. The hardware >manufacturer should make the drivers for windows 2000 if they want their >hardware to work in Windows2000. MS has done an awesome job of making sure >most stuff works, but I've read too many hardware sites that say, "MS has a >pretty good driver for our hardware and although it could be better, we >aren't going to bother making a new one". Actually, sounds like CF 4.5 does work with W2K encryption. CF reports that it cant' read the file. That's because it's encrypted. File encryption is supposed to make the files unreadable except by the encrypting/unencrypting program. Wordpad can normally read .cfm files, but if you use CF's code encryption, Wordpad can no longer open the files. No one seems to be complaining about that, it works as it's supposed to. Why is anyone complaining about W2K file encryption not being able to be undone by other programs? Judah (who is in a contrary mood today...no offense intended to anyone) -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
maybe you shouldn't let MS encrypt the pages and just let CF do the work like its supposed to if something is going to go through two encryption/decryption processes from two different servers what is going to define which goes first common sense - Original Message - From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:33 PM Subject: Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? > Forgive me for asking, but if MS gives a new 'feature' that will effect CF, > Perl, Rebol and almost every non-MS scripting language, why would you think > it needs a fix from Allaire? > > > > Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to > > support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: > > > > The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, > > or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted > > > > as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. > > > > anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a > service > > patch? > > > -- > Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk > To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body. -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
On the other hand, who says that they all have problems with it? Maybe only Cold Fusion does. Unless someone's tried them all, I don't think you can say one way or the other who's problem it is, but I do think that Allaire is the ones who would need to fix it. As well as each of the others. You don't have to use the MS Encryption (I don't see why you would need to), but if you do, you have to use products that work with it. It is not up to MS to make sure their technology works with other programming languages unless they said the encryption process is for use with them. That's like saying MS has to make drivers for Windows 2000 for all of your hardware. They don't. The hardware manufacturer should make the drivers for windows 2000 if they want their hardware to work in Windows2000. MS has done an awesome job of making sure most stuff works, but I've read too many hardware sites that say, "MS has a pretty good driver for our hardware and although it could be better, we aren't going to bother making a new one". - Original Message - From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 1:33 PM Subject: Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? > Forgive me for asking, but if MS gives a new 'feature' that will effect CF, > Perl, Rebol and almost every non-MS scripting language, why would you think > it needs a fix from Allaire? > > > > Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to > > support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: > > > > The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, > > or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted > > > > as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. > > > > anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a > service > > patch? > > > -- > Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk > To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body. > -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
Mike, I wouldn't expect it to be dealt with. That's a feature of Win2K to help protect your files in an internal, corporate environment. MS would have to allow 3rd party vendors access to their unecryption algorithms in order to do this. This would essentially negate any security that encryption might offer you. As a side note, the admins of CF-Talk list have disabled file attachment capabilities because of a virus scare so any messages w/ attached files are coming out screwy. Would you mind removing your atworklogo_very_small.gif & Glacier Bkgrd.jpg files from your messages. Thanks, Rey... Certified Allaire Instructor Member of Team Allaire "A browser's beauty, at its heart, is its usefulness as a *TOOL*." - Original Message - From: "Mike Amburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Cf-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:46 PM Subject: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to > support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: > > The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, > or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted > > as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. > > anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a service > patch? > > Mike Amburn > Application Development > > --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 > Content-Type: image/gif; > name="atworklogo_very_small.gif" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > Content-ID: <994194320@29032000-1c68> > > R0lGODlhhwAsAPcAAMDAwHNzc4SEhKWlpa2trdbW1ufn5+/v77Wtpf/nvffWnP/vzv/nte/WpXtr > Sv/WhPfv3vfWjO/OhPfGWvfGUvfOa++9OffWc+fGY+/GUue9Svfv1v/nnP/nlN7Gc97Ga+/GKffG > GOe1CPfGCP/GAJSMa+fWjFpSMf/WMee9GOe9APfGAN7Wrf/nc97GUv/eQufGKf/3xv/nUu/WSt7G > Of/ve9bGSu/npefWQt7OOf/3nP/3jP/3e//3Y6WlnM7Ovf//zv//xu/vra2te///td7elPf/vd7n > pdbn1qW9tWN7c87W1rW9vUpSUnuMjDFCQuf3/6W1vYyltb3Gzpylrd7v/4SMlGNrc0pSWtbe55Sc > pVJaY9bn/zFCWhAhOb3O56W1zmNzjL3G1pyltXuElFpjczlCUsbO3qWtvYSMnJytzjlKaxAhQhgx > YwgYOdbe787W57W9zq21xoyUpXN7jGtzhHOErWNznBApawgYQgghY73G3nuEnFpje5Sl1jlKezFC > cxgpWhAhUsbO56WtxpSctYyUrWNrhFJac0pSa2t7rWNzpSkxSkpajFJjnCk5axAhWggYSgAQQpyl > xoyc1oSUzjlCYzFChBghQhgpawAQStbe/7W93q211r3G73N7nGNrjFJae1pjjHOEzjE5WikxUiEp > Sik5exAYORAhawgYWoyUvWtznEpSe0JKcyExexAYQhgpewgQOcbO/62156Wt3pSczoSMvXuEtWNr > nDlCezE5ayEpWhghUrW994yUzoSMxkpSjCkxayEpYxAYUkJKjCkxcykxhCEpcyEpexAYWhAYYwgQ > Wufn787O1rW1vaWlrZycpdbW597e78bG1r29zpycrdbW72tre97e/4yMpb293lJSY7W13sbG94SE > pb2973t7nGtrjISEtSEhMTExSmNjpSEhQjExYzExawgIIca9xmtja/fn7wAA > ACH5BAEALACHACwA > QAj/AAEIHEiwoMGDCBMqXMiwocOHECNKLHigWho02yYqvDaslxaNIEO+OWXMi6kkY9oYCwSoChSC > tgJlWjamILheMxFVEWin1zA8vCC1eZRFYCGhmA4BsMPMmKBHhgYRLBBtDaY2gsIIFCCoVxdpBBcJ > aiPMG4BBXjJl+ghACjNkqAq1C6nQTiRjy0qFqtMnVJ8+ZUKRSnXMFCiBtQQtw0MF4RxNxpAdcxOK > oBQ3bTLFitUl20Bs6kixa0KIS0FPgIY9yhPmJRlVeLpsAhBOVi9BtQiCK5UJjyGBZCQN4+WHLsgD > KlbAsMDBiEQgQHRwaFEhQwYDCw1MmXaGyZmEU5ox/0TyA3vCAg7FxDHOvr17hQecERiw7oBCJAbm > vt/fEMqeOdgkws0VZFAhxxnTAGAfANPAEccY34SCSiTDGAMMfxgWxIkuyhijVhtRDATFGLZMMskq > haA4iRSTVHEIMcMo00hB2xgjDB6CLFKQL714aEYnBNGyiiKiNJKLId14BgAddAg0hSGrmGgiIZ1I > VRCUwCxRUCeTkCEFEhk2EskpmdgBABRo5oJMMpAUI9AGEBRiSiCBWGPQNFYJ84gvjQTSCyOmkQEJ > HplQMsoy6ESCBgCtmJLJMGYpROYwbqYB2zC5gGLOH2xEEskTjQEADjqQBNLIbYEokqFAaDSBSCiJ > fP93kAw4lHBCGYlsoZ5ffYSIkBh9JIIIWwRdww43JzjQwA0sCAGBiGKE04clpZRiSR/hUGPQAK0g > UkeCAlFzSCgDOgPAGX2IEsozBYkjTiJ1oLeqQjeYYAMNKeSrb74wwIDBBxKYkMACxp3BjkB0aHGG > AHMkAsAS0kBjJzdvpGHIG30MEs41AByyxzdgfMMHAIawAkYhnXxzDSgrg7FNOIWA8gkYVzbZhxiD > pEHNFlnENy+GVVwDhjZ1FFOMLrukk84aruQyTiez/Sz1qllQQ4c4VshBkH4ONbMKOrwQ48TU+3VS > LSm8dKOgQ4ScA/Yu4EhTzRTyAjMMG4Ac9E0v6Jz/c4h5DE1jRhlku/eFJcS0gcxMeDBipSfo9NJL > OjDyogwvkaDzxhvFQKJWqABcww2MeuBhii0DNROKKcMQ881ZhxgjSRuQQKKKIIG00QYzyezyy0Bp > KNPGMMLY2EsebuRhiRoCcYIJMszUJFAnfUSShyucrFpFIjGasgpPdymzhmkDrWIK7dIT9A2dptwC > gDe89GKKHbWUEoseSmVjSS+88DJLJcoYRiCU8BKE8AESwpDEHQBghWW0oRSzIAguehGJUuzhLOcj > BiGqIIo8EAMQb5gXF/qwjEw8QhilYEOnMMELZOAhFqmogzTgZIte0M5OBunE+TLxCmTcZg4CMcAf > /2TSQ2RgojVLyUNmmpSQOQwvEouAwmsy8QdbhAIWqpkE+QQyi1K0AQ+d8AYgTCGJRoQwQ2noHy+C > gRAgDIEUpohck2rBCwGCziCLgIUwlGGJLxCEC4K6hIcQAAAjCIEIQmBCAEqhDqEEYhiQzEQbiBGI > UBBiIE5QBSTQwTEATAITiQpFJ3cjyUUJpBvoyIQyENHJwgEAAiRQgQeI8B4dSCcCDWCAK3cJEQpo > QAQiGEEIZNADDuggCMhMpg52UIMayGAGOaCBDVxgggY8yyEFcAY1yDCNZzTjDUsAFzW0lAQ6hPNc > 0hjEGc8gKzrYaRrUANcZqGGIM0jvDHB4yTSuIf+rgVihDgDYAz8LmIV1TKUovNTIMxKRoCloAyxn > sMIYziCNOdhJolZQGB2ogYY4TMEaBbACGphAhTOkwUF1sKjVqiGHek4DDWg4gzWYAI2BEE0adYip > Fpwxh2fQbQwGTahQh0rU9kwjC0jAD+CKylSQVGMM4rCEKchxjnNAUhjCABsmYDEhUoRCa00N60GW > YIhgHcIQ1ChgQzbxCWNgLh1iEGtTpfGMOQhgG0qiCyvCNja5OoQa1agGuyKChj10Iq4CWQcB5CCN > bHhiDxc0SAGqcYbAQiRyU/BrQ8KBClNEAhOigMg1ygGLXmBiHAYJBSbyMAywDiQb6IAkKl7HEPv/ >
Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
Forgive me for asking, but if MS gives a new 'feature' that will effect CF, Perl, Rebol and almost every non-MS scripting language, why would you think it needs a fix from Allaire? > > Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to > support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: > > The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, > or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted > > as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. > > anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a service > patch? -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
