Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-21 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Adrocknaphobia wrote:
 Jochem: I think the website is to blame for both parts. All sites
 should be cross-browser compliant.

What is your definition of 'cross-browser compliant'?


 All I was saying is from a 508
 standpoint it is a poor example, the fundamental objective of 508 is
 to provide the same access to information, regardless of disability...
 and regardless of thier browser choice.

And that is exactly what that website is doing. Everybody gets 
the same access regardless of their browser choice: there is no 
browser sniffing and sending broken, incomplete or less 
functional pages to some browsers.


 I know you don't want to hear
 it, but the vast majority of users use IE, so common sense says code
 to IE first, whether its standard compliant or not, then worry about
 the other 5%.

Common sense is to code for your requirements. And with any 
website that needs to comply with section 508 or 2000/78/EC that 
includes standard compliance. We wouldn't want to break the law, 
would we?

Jochem

~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210072
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


RE: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-21 Thread Sandy Clark
Just an FYI, 

Section 508 is the government's requirements for the departments of the
executive branch and those receiving grant monies (or other monies) from the
executive branch and using that money to put something up on the web.

Current cases in the courts (including the agreement between both Ramada.com
and priceline.com with the New York Attorney General's office (under the
ADA) always are referencing the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG
1.0) put out by the W3C.

http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/

AA (Priority 1 and 2) items make for a very good accessible site.
Paragraphs a-k of Section 508 Paragraph 1194.22 directly maps itself to many
Priority 1 items.  If you add in paragraphs l-o of Section 508 you are good
to go.

Sandy Clark
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 2:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Section 508 Compliance

Interesting. Unfortunately Mozilla is lacking in other areas for 508 that
I've tested. Like the inability to enlarge radio buttons and checkboxes. It
will enlarge the text on a form, but leave checkboxes and radio buttons
tiny, only enlarging the box around them.

-Adam

On 6/20/05, Dave Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ctrl-mousewheel works in FF   :P
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 2:03 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: Section 508 Compliance
 
 
 Kinda ironic, but it should be noted that section508.gov isn't a very 
 good example of 508 compliancy itself. The biggest glaring mistake is 
 using an external mechanism outside the browser to adjust the text 
 size. If someone has poor vision, they aren't going to try and located 
 the mechanism on the page to enlarge the text. (If they can even find
 it)
 
 -Adam
 
 On 6/20/05, Deanna Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  http://www.section508.gov/
 
  On 6/20/05, Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   A client is asking us about having their website coded for the
disabled.
   I'm assuming he's talking about Section 508 compliance.  Can 
   anyone
 point me
   in the right direction for this?
  
  
  
   Russ
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 



~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210075
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-21 Thread Bryan Stevenson
A client is asking us about having their website coded for the disabled.
 I'm assuming he's talking about Section 508 compliance.  Can anyone point 
 me
 in the right direction for this?

Yes Section 508 is accessibility in the USin Canada it's a different set 
of rules that cover a lot of the same or similar issues

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.comcfm/54 


~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210090
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-20 Thread Deanna Schneider
http://www.section508.gov/

On 6/20/05, Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 A client is asking us about having their website coded for the disabled.
 I'm assuming he's talking about Section 508 compliance.  Can anyone point me
 in the right direction for this?
 
 
 
 Russ
 
 
 
 

~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:20
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-20 Thread Michael Wolfe
http://www.section508.gov/

On 6/20/05, Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Also, since the Bobby compliance checker is no longer free, take a look at the 
CSE HTML Validator (http://www.htmlvalidator.com). It does a nice job of 
checking your generated HTML for 508 compliance.

--
Michael Wolfe

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210002
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-20 Thread Adrocknaphobia
Kinda ironic, but it should be noted that section508.gov isn't a very
good example of 508 compliancy itself. The biggest glaring mistake is
using an external mechanism outside the browser to adjust the text
size. If someone has poor vision, they aren't going to try and located
the mechanism on the page to enlarge the text. (If they can even find
it)

-Adam

On 6/20/05, Deanna Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://www.section508.gov/
 
 On 6/20/05, Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  A client is asking us about having their website coded for the disabled.
  I'm assuming he's talking about Section 508 compliance.  Can anyone point me
  in the right direction for this?
 
 
 
  Russ
 
 
 
 
 
 

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210006
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-20 Thread John Dowdell
Russ wrote:
 A client is asking us about having their website coded for the disabled.
 I'm assuming he's talking about Section 508 compliance.  Can anyone point me
 in the right direction for this?

 and for information on using Macromedia tools to better support 
those regulations, as well as links to varied resources, try:
http://www.macromedia.com/resources/accessibility/

jd




-- 
John Dowdell . Macromedia Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA
Weblog: http://www.macromedia.com/go/blog_jd
Aggregator: http://www.macromedia.com/go/weblogs
Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/
Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks.

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210007
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-20 Thread Adrocknaphobia
The 508 check within Dreamweaver is quite good, and will cover most
corporate needs.

-Adam

On 6/20/05, John Dowdell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Russ wrote:
  A client is asking us about having their website coded for the disabled.
  I'm assuming he's talking about Section 508 compliance.  Can anyone point me
  in the right direction for this?
 
  and for information on using Macromedia tools to better support
 those regulations, as well as links to varied resources, try:
 http://www.macromedia.com/resources/accessibility/
 
 jd
 
 
 
 
 --
 John Dowdell . Macromedia Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA
 Weblog: http://www.macromedia.com/go/blog_jd
 Aggregator: http://www.macromedia.com/go/weblogs
 Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/
 Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks.
 
 

~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210008
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


RE: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-20 Thread Dave Francis
Ctrl-mousewheel works in FF   :P

-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 2:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Section 508 Compliance


Kinda ironic, but it should be noted that section508.gov isn't a very
good example of 508 compliancy itself. The biggest glaring mistake is
using an external mechanism outside the browser to adjust the text
size. If someone has poor vision, they aren't going to try and located
the mechanism on the page to enlarge the text. (If they can even find
it)

-Adam

On 6/20/05, Deanna Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://www.section508.gov/

 On 6/20/05, Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  A client is asking us about having their website coded for the disabled.
  I'm assuming he's talking about Section 508 compliance.  Can anyone
point me
  in the right direction for this?
 
 
 
  Russ
 
 
 
 





~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210009
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-20 Thread Adrocknaphobia
Interesting. Unfortunately Mozilla is lacking in other areas for 508
that I've tested. Like the inability to enlarge radio buttons and
checkboxes. It will enlarge the text on a form, but leave checkboxes
and radio buttons tiny, only enlarging the box around them.

-Adam

On 6/20/05, Dave Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ctrl-mousewheel works in FF   :P
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 2:03 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: Section 508 Compliance
 
 
 Kinda ironic, but it should be noted that section508.gov isn't a very
 good example of 508 compliancy itself. The biggest glaring mistake is
 using an external mechanism outside the browser to adjust the text
 size. If someone has poor vision, they aren't going to try and located
 the mechanism on the page to enlarge the text. (If they can even find
 it)
 
 -Adam
 
 On 6/20/05, Deanna Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  http://www.section508.gov/
 
  On 6/20/05, Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   A client is asking us about having their website coded for the disabled.
   I'm assuming he's talking about Section 508 compliance.  Can anyone
 point me
   in the right direction for this?
  
  
  
   Russ
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210012
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-20 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Adrocknaphobia wrote:
 From: Adrocknaphobia

 Kinda ironic, but it should be noted that section508.gov isn't a very
 good example of 508 compliancy itself. The biggest glaring mistake is
 using an external mechanism outside the browser to adjust the text
 size.

 Interesting. Unfortunately Mozilla is lacking in other areas for 508
 that I've tested.

So when Mozilla can't resize a tiny part of the page, it is 
lacking, but when IE can't resize anything on the page, the 
website is to blame?

The User Agent Accesibility Guidelines specifically say that a 
user agent should give final control over the rendering 
(including font size) to the user. So when we have 
section508.gov, Mozilla and IE, which one has the big glaring 
mistake?

Jochem

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210015
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-20 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
 Interesting. Unfortunately Mozilla is lacking in other
 areas for 508
 that I've tested. Like the inability to enlarge radio
 buttons and
 checkboxes. It will enlarge the text on a form, but leave
 checkboxes
 and radio buttons tiny, only enlarging the box around
 them.

Afaik MSIE doesn't change the size of checkboxes and radio buttons
either... input type=checkbox style=width: 1500; / ... the
checkbox will be wider than your browser, but the graphical portion
of it will still be 15 px wide. I expect most browsers behave
similarly, although I haven't tested that specifically.


s. isaac dealey   954.522.6080
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?

add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework

http://www.fusiontap.com
http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm




~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210016
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-20 Thread Adrocknaphobia
Jochem: I think the website is to blame for both parts. All sites
should be cross-browser compliant. All I was saying is from a 508
standpoint it is a poor example, the fundamental objective of 508 is
to provide the same access to information, regardless of disability...
and regardless of thier browser choice. I know you don't want to hear
it, but the vast majority of users use IE, so common sense says code
to IE first, whether its standard compliant or not, then worry about
the other 5%.

Isaac. width: 1500 is a fixed size. trying using ems and changing the
text size in the browser. Rachel (my css purist fiance) gave me a
lecture on it, growing a checkbox to the entire size of the browser.
The same code in mozilla just enlarged the box model around the
checkbox but the checkbox remained small.

-Adam



On 6/20/05, S. Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Interesting. Unfortunately Mozilla is lacking in other
  areas for 508
  that I've tested. Like the inability to enlarge radio
  buttons and
  checkboxes. It will enlarge the text on a form, but leave
  checkboxes
  and radio buttons tiny, only enlarging the box around
  them.
 
 Afaik MSIE doesn't change the size of checkboxes and radio buttons
 either... input type=checkbox style=width: 1500; / ... the
 checkbox will be wider than your browser, but the graphical portion
 of it will still be 15 px wide. I expect most browsers behave
 similarly, although I haven't tested that specifically.
 
 
 s. isaac dealey   954.522.6080
 new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
 
 add features without fixtures with
 the onTap open source framework
 
 http://www.fusiontap.com
 http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm
 
 
 
 
 

~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210018
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-20 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
 Isaac. width: 1500 is a fixed size. trying using ems and
 changing the text size in the browser. Rachel (my css
 purist fiance) gave me a lecture on it, growing a checkbox
 to the entire size of the browser. The same code in mozilla
 just enlarged the box model around the checkbox but the
 checkbox remained small.

Yeah, using em is on the long list of things I've not gotten around
to. :P

s. isaac dealey   954.522.6080
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?

add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework

http://www.fusiontap.com
http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm




~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210033
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-20 Thread Duncan
The Web Developer Toolbar in FF has a vaalidate 508 tool on it, not
sure how accurate it is, but it comes up with some sensible
suggestions.



On 6/21/05, S. Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Isaac. width: 1500 is a fixed size. trying using ems and
  changing the text size in the browser. Rachel (my css
  purist fiance) gave me a lecture on it, growing a checkbox
  to the entire size of the browser. The same code in mozilla
  just enlarged the box model around the checkbox but the
  checkbox remained small.
 
 Yeah, using em is on the long list of things I've not gotten around
 to. :P
 
 s. isaac dealey   954.522.6080
 new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
 
 add features without fixtures with
 the onTap open source framework
 
 http://www.fusiontap.com
 http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm
 
 
 
 
 

~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210041
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-20 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey
The Web Developer Toolbar in FF has a vaalidate 508 tool on it, not
sure how accurate it is, but it comes up with some sensible
suggestions.

Yes, that's the CynthiaSays Tool, similar to the old Bobby validator. If you 
don't use FF and the WD toolbar (why not?!) it can be found directly at:

http://www.contentquality.com/

Bobby was replaced with WebXACT which has a real comprehensive set of tests 
too. 

http://webxact.watchfire.com/submit.aspx?scanurl=http://www.cfwebstore.com


Mary Jo Sminkey
http://www.cfwebstore.com
CFWebstore, ColdFusion E-commerce



~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210049
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: Section 508 Compliance

2005-06-20 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey
 Bobby was replaced with WebXACT which has a real comprehensive set of 
 tests too. 

Oops, sorry about that, actual URL for WebXACT is:
 
http://webxact.watchfire.com

 

Mary Jo Sminkey
http://www.cfwebstore.com
CFWebstore, ColdFusion E-commerce
 

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210051
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54