[cfaussie] Re: anyone using cfeclipse 1.3 beta?
I have been using 1.3 since it was released... I love it and with the aptana eclipse plugin (http://www.aptana.com/blog/) and sub eclipse im a very happy web developer. I am finding that since upgrading to eclipse 3.3 I have had less crash issues also (my mac used to crash quite often). One of the coolest features of 1.3 is line wrapping - great for the train :) Rob. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: anyone using cfeclipse 1.3 beta?
Good tips Shane. Mark Drew is coming into my work next week, so if anyone has any questions that ya would like to know how he answered when asked in person (put on the spot) let us know and I'll askM@who's currently listening to a "teach yourself Icelandic" cd on his ipod :S. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: anyone using cfeclipse 1.3 beta?
Eclipse is getting a little faster with the improved Swing speeds in newer (Java 5+) JVM's. I use it at work for Java as it is free and it's something my company (as well as most) loves to do (keep costs low). Since I use Linux for my main box now (for server reasons) there is nothing out there for Java that would compare to Eclipse, Netbeans or IntelliJ that isn't written in Java so I have to deal with a slow IDE. I must say, one of the things that made me stop using Eclipse the first time was the speed but 3.2 is solid (mostly) and faster than previous versions. Barry, one thing I would suggest is running 3.2 on the latest Java 5 JVM or if you are adventurous, Java 6 Beta 2. They offer a pretty good performance boost for Swing apps. Also remember to up the memory settings to 256 or 512 (-Xmx512m -Xms64m) in your eclipse.ini file. There are still issues with memory usage at time but hey, you get that with Java. I haven't used CFEclipse 1.3 as of yet so I can't tell you anything about that, just Eclipse itself. My 2c, Shane P.S. The Web Standards Toolkit (WST plugin) has just had an update so that could be useful to some of you out there. On 10/6/06, M@ Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: While on eclipse etc, I'll say thisthere is no such thing as being elite solely because of the editor you use, eclipse is great and so is dreamweaver, I run across some devs who think if you use eclipse that means your super uber duber great and if you use dw your backwards and have no idea how to code, and some who think using home site is super leet, an IDE is simply that, its all about personal preference.personally I and the other 30 cf devs at work use cfeclipse, I solely use it to keep consistency within the dept, but on my personal lappy I use DW in coder layout, as dw is way way faster, I find it funny when the (minority of eclipse users) say "eclipse is way faster then dw, thats why eclipse is great" as its so wrong from my experience, to many people from cfeclipse day one thought it was great cos it had the leet status where l337 users used it so it must be the best etc. but there is nothing wrong with any editor, providing you think its best for you, if you use notepad so be it. I find dw way way faster as its a basic c++ app that runs like it should, where as eclipse relies on the jvm and is a lot slower, in dw when I open a file it opens instantly when I type 200 words a minute the letters appear instantly where as in eclipse its like a whole separate debate is going on in the background. I like dw for its speed and out of the box package, but I also like eclipse for its powerful plugins/extensions etc, to be more on topic I've had no issues with eclipse .3 , the homesite/cfstudio/dw8+ style tabbed menu (that has been around in other editors for over 8 years) is great, but still only trying to be half what dw is, eclipse has powerful extensions that's its only advantage over dw, the method viewer etc has been in dw as long as cfc's have existed.so to sum up as I'm rambling and am about to hit the sack. 1. latest beta cfeclipse is good,2. a IDE choice don't make you a better coder.3. dw is faster then eclipse :PM@who just got back from a meeting of "long messages anonymous" --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: anyone using cfeclipse 1.3 beta?
Barry, I tried the same about a month ago and Flex Builder plugin definitely does not play well with Eclipse 3.2. It's unusable... You will run into a whole stack of Flex debugger issues including an insane number of pop ups warning about compile marker errors. The hooks into the flash debugger will die more often, eclipse with lock up etc etc. If you spend alot of time in Flex Builder it's not worth upgrading just yet. Angus On 06/10/06, M@ Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: While on eclipse etc, I'll say thisthere is no such thing as being elite solely because of the editor you use, eclipse is great and so is dreamweaver, I run across some devs who think if you use eclipse that means your super uber duber great and if you use dw your backwards and have no idea how to code, and some who think using home site is super leet, an IDE is simply that, its all about personal preference.personally I and the other 30 cf devs at work use cfeclipse, I solely use it to keep consistency within the dept, but on my personal lappy I use DW in coder layout, as dw is way way faster, I find it funny when the (minority of eclipse users) say "eclipse is way faster then dw, thats why eclipse is great" as its so wrong from my experience, to many people from cfeclipse day one thought it was great cos it had the leet status where l337 users used it so it must be the best etc. but there is nothing wrong with any editor, providing you think its best for you, if you use notepad so be it. I find dw way way faster as its a basic c++ app that runs like it should, where as eclipse relies on the jvm and is a lot slower, in dw when I open a file it opens instantly when I type 200 words a minute the letters appear instantly where as in eclipse its like a whole separate debate is going on in the background. I like dw for its speed and out of the box package, but I also like eclipse for its powerful plugins/extensions etc, to be more on topic I've had no issues with eclipse .3 , the homesite/cfstudio/dw8+ style tabbed menu (that has been around in other editors for over 8 years) is great, but still only trying to be half what dw is, eclipse has powerful extensions that's its only advantage over dw, the method viewer etc has been in dw as long as cfc's have existed.so to sum up as I'm rambling and am about to hit the sack. 1. latest beta cfeclipse is good,2. a IDE choice don't make you a better coder.3. dw is faster then eclipse :PM@who just got back from a meeting of "long messages anonymous" --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: anyone using cfeclipse 1.3 beta?
While on eclipse etc, I'll say thisthere is no such thing as being elite solely because of the editor you use,eclipse is great and so is dreamweaver, I run across some devs who think if you use eclipse that means your super uber duber great and if you use dw your backwards and have no idea how to code, and some who think using home site is super leet, an IDE is simply that, its all about personal preference.personally I and the other 30 cf devs at work use cfeclipse, I solely use it to keep consistency within the dept, but on my personal lappy I use DW in coder layout, as dw is way way faster, I find it funny when the (minority of eclipse users) say "eclipse is way faster then dw, thats why eclipse is great" as its so wrong from my experience, to many people from cfeclipse day one thought it was great cos it had the leet status where l337 users used it so it must be the best etc. but there is nothing wrong with any editor, providing you think its best for you, if you use notepad so be it. I find dw way way faster as its a basic c++ app that runs like it should, where as eclipse relies on the jvm and is a lot slower, in dw when I open a file it opens instantly when I type 200 words a minute the letters appear instantly where as in eclipse its like a whole separate debate is going on in the background. I like dw for its speed and out of the box package, but I also like eclipse for its powerful plugins/extensions etc, to be more on topic I've had no issues with eclipse .3 , the homesite/cfstudio/dw8+ style tabbed menu (that has been around in other editors for over 8 years) is great, but still only trying to be half what dw is, eclipse has powerful extensions that's its only advantage over dw, the method viewer etc has been in dw as long as cfc's have existed.so to sum up as I'm rambling and am about to hit the sack. 1. latest beta cfeclipse is good,2. a IDE choice don't make you a better coder.3. dw is faster then eclipse :PM@who just got back from a meeting of "long messages anonymous" --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: anyone using cfeclipse 1.3 beta?
> i was using dream weaver before. > > I havent noticed any bugs yet, for all it's limitations and clunky-ness, I found the core features of Homesite 5.5 - the code editor and code parsing - rock solid... (as it should be being the main function of the thing) I've also found Flexbuilder's code parsing rock solid as well (although it occasionally crashes and drops out of memory... but that could be my bad luck) On 10/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have just started to use the 1.3 version though i havent used > cfeclipse before. > > This is a great tool though, i was using dream weaver before. > > I havent noticed any bugs yet, and it seems to give me all of the > functionality i had with dream weaver, but it is early days yet > > Jamie > > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: anyone using cfeclipse 1.3 beta?
I have just started to use the 1.3 version though i havent used cfeclipse before. This is a great tool though, i was using dream weaver before. I havent noticed any bugs yet, and it seems to give me all of the functionality i had with dream weaver, but it is early days yet Jamie --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: anyone using cfeclipse 1.3 beta?
On 10/4/06, Gareth Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of the problems I had was it only runs with Eclipse 3.2, so I'm > unable to run it with Flex Builder. (With all Flex builder bits running > properly at least). Why can't you run Flex Builder on 3.2? What part of Flex Builder doesn't work with 3.2? Chris -- Chris Velevitch Manager - Sydney Flash Platform Developers Group m: 0415 469 095 www.flashdev.org.au --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: anyone using cfeclipse 1.3 beta?
oh my god!! I'm so friggin blind... I'm going back to bed. thanks. jeremy --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: anyone using cfeclipse 1.3 beta?
Right hand side of home page. http://cfeclipse.org/ Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au -Original Message- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sent: Wednesday, 4 October 2006 10:37 AM To: cfaussie Subject: [cfaussie] Re: anyone using cfeclipse 1.3 beta? Where do you download it. I went there but couldn't find it. Is it the 1.2 download nightly build? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: anyone using cfeclipse 1.3 beta?
Where do you download it. I went there but couldn't find it. Is it the 1.2 download nightly build? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: anyone using cfeclipse 1.3 beta?
I've been using the Beta since it came out, and so far, no huge dramas. Yes it has its quirks, but overall, I've got no issue. Mark On 10/4/06, Gareth Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One of the problems I had was it only runs with Eclipse 3.2, so I'm > unable to run it with Flex Builder. (With all Flex builder bits running > properly at least). > > The other thing is that syntax parsing errors seem to still occur, but > in different areas. > > Cheers > Gareth. > > Barry Beattie wrote: > > I'm just about blow away my eclipse 3.1/cfeclipse 1.2 setup. > > > > but at mentioning this at the CFUG last night an "air of trepidation" > > arose... > > > > http://cfeclipse.org/beta/features.html > > > > I'm not particularly looking to use the new features, I'm more > > interested in improvements to core functionality - eg the code editor. > > > > those that have given cfeclipse 1.3 beta a "good shake"... is it a > > waste of time or worthwhile? > > > > thanx > > barry.b > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: anyone using cfeclipse 1.3 beta?
One of the problems I had was it only runs with Eclipse 3.2, so I'm unable to run it with Flex Builder. (With all Flex builder bits running properly at least). The other thing is that syntax parsing errors seem to still occur, but in different areas. Cheers Gareth. Barry Beattie wrote: > I'm just about blow away my eclipse 3.1/cfeclipse 1.2 setup. > > but at mentioning this at the CFUG last night an "air of trepidation" arose... > > http://cfeclipse.org/beta/features.html > > I'm not particularly looking to use the new features, I'm more > interested in improvements to core functionality - eg the code editor. > > those that have given cfeclipse 1.3 beta a "good shake"... is it a > waste of time or worthwhile? > > thanx > barry.b > > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
